首页 > 最新文献

Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery最新文献

英文 中文
Clinical outcomes and quality of life 1 year after open microsurgical decompression or implantation of an interspinous stand-alone spacer. 开放性显微手术减压或棘间独立间隔器植入后1年的临床结果和生活质量。
Pub Date : 2010-08-01 Epub Date: 2010-12-03 DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1263108
R Sobottke, M Röllinghoff, J Siewe, U Schlegel, A Yagdiran, M Spangenberg, R Lesch, P Eysel, T Koy

Background: Interspinous stand-alone implants are inserted without open decompression to treat symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The insertion procedure is technically simple, low-risk, and quick. However, the question remains whether the resulting clinical outcomes compare with those of microsurgical decompression, the gold standard.

Material and methods: This prospective, comparative study included all patients (n=36) with neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC) secondary to LSS with symptoms improving in forward flexion treated operatively with either interspinous stand-alone spacer insertion (Aperius (®); Medtronic, Tolochenaz, Switzerland) (group 1) or microsurgical bilateral operative decompression (group 2) between February 2007 and November 2008. Data (patient data, operative data, COMI, SF-36 PCS and MCS, ODI, and walking tolerance) were collected preoperatively as well as at 6 weeks, at 3, 6, and 9 months, and at one year follow-up (FU). All patients had complete FU over 1 year.

Results: Compared to preoperative measurements, surgery led to improvements of all parameters in the entire collective as well as both individual groups. There were no statistically relevant differences between the 2 groups over the entire course of FU. However, improvements in the ODI and SF-36 MCS were not significant in group 1, in contrast to those of group 2. Also, although in group 1 the improvements in leg pain (VAS leg) were still significant (p<0.05) at 6 months, this was no longer the case at 1 year FU. In group 1 at 1 year FU an increase in leg pain was observed, while in group 2,  minimal improvements continued. Walking tolerance was significantly improved at all FU times compared to preoperatively, regardless of group (p<0.01). At no time there was a significant difference between the groups. In group 1, admission and operative times were shorter and blood loss decreased. The complication rate was 0% in group 1 and 20% in group 2, however reoperation was required by 27.3% of group 1 patients and 0% of group 2.

Conclusion: Implantation of an interspinous stand-alone spacer yields clinical success comparable to open decompression, at least within the first year of FU. The 1-year conversion rate of 27.3% is, however, decidedly too high.

背景:棘间独立植入物无需开放减压即可插入治疗症状性腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)。插入过程在技术上简单、低风险、快速。然而,问题仍然是,所产生的临床结果是否与金标准显微外科减压相比较。材料和方法:这项前瞻性的比较研究纳入了所有LSS继发的神经源性间歇性跛行(NIC)患者(n=36),通过脊柱间独立间隔器插入(Aperius(®);Medtronic, Tolochenaz, Switzerland)(第一组)或显微外科双侧手术减压(第二组),时间为2007年2月至2008年11月。收集术前、6周、3、6、9个月和1年随访(FU)时的数据(患者数据、手术数据、COMI、SF-36 PCS和MCS、ODI和步行耐量)。所有患者均在1年内完成FU。结果:与术前测量相比,手术使整个集体以及两个个体组的所有参数得到改善。两组在FU治疗的整个过程中无统计学差异。然而,与第2组相比,第1组ODI和SF-36 MCS的改善并不显著。此外,尽管在第1组中,腿部疼痛(VAS腿)的改善仍然显著(p结论:至少在FU的第一年,棘间独立间隔器的植入可获得与开放减压相当的临床成功。然而,27.3%的1年转换率显然太高了。
{"title":"Clinical outcomes and quality of life 1 year after open microsurgical decompression or implantation of an interspinous stand-alone spacer.","authors":"R Sobottke,&nbsp;M Röllinghoff,&nbsp;J Siewe,&nbsp;U Schlegel,&nbsp;A Yagdiran,&nbsp;M Spangenberg,&nbsp;R Lesch,&nbsp;P Eysel,&nbsp;T Koy","doi":"10.1055/s-0030-1263108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1263108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interspinous stand-alone implants are inserted without open decompression to treat symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The insertion procedure is technically simple, low-risk, and quick. However, the question remains whether the resulting clinical outcomes compare with those of microsurgical decompression, the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective, comparative study included all patients (n=36) with neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC) secondary to LSS with symptoms improving in forward flexion treated operatively with either interspinous stand-alone spacer insertion (Aperius (®); Medtronic, Tolochenaz, Switzerland) (group 1) or microsurgical bilateral operative decompression (group 2) between February 2007 and November 2008. Data (patient data, operative data, COMI, SF-36 PCS and MCS, ODI, and walking tolerance) were collected preoperatively as well as at 6 weeks, at 3, 6, and 9 months, and at one year follow-up (FU). All patients had complete FU over 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to preoperative measurements, surgery led to improvements of all parameters in the entire collective as well as both individual groups. There were no statistically relevant differences between the 2 groups over the entire course of FU. However, improvements in the ODI and SF-36 MCS were not significant in group 1, in contrast to those of group 2. Also, although in group 1 the improvements in leg pain (VAS leg) were still significant (p<0.05) at 6 months, this was no longer the case at 1 year FU. In group 1 at 1 year FU an increase in leg pain was observed, while in group 2,  minimal improvements continued. Walking tolerance was significantly improved at all FU times compared to preoperatively, regardless of group (p<0.01). At no time there was a significant difference between the groups. In group 1, admission and operative times were shorter and blood loss decreased. The complication rate was 0% in group 1 and 20% in group 2, however reoperation was required by 27.3% of group 1 patients and 0% of group 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implantation of an interspinous stand-alone spacer yields clinical success comparable to open decompression, at least within the first year of FU. The 1-year conversion rate of 27.3% is, however, decidedly too high.</p>","PeriodicalId":49808,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0030-1263108","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29514891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31
Endoscopic management of a rare case of nasal glioma in Meckel's cave in an adult: case report. 内镜下治疗一例罕见的成人梅克尔洞鼻胶质瘤:1例报告。
Pub Date : 2010-08-01 Epub Date: 2010-12-03 DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262812
M K Kasliwal, V K Anand, E Lavi, T H Schwartz

Background: Nasal glioma or glial heterotopia is a rare embryologic anomaly that heralds its presence shortly after birth or in childhood. Nasal glioma in an adult is very rare, often asymptomatic and the occurrence of nasal glioma in Meckel's cave in an adult has not been previously reported.

Case report: The authors encountered a case of an incidentally diagnosed Meckel's cave nasal glioma in a 40-year-old male which was successfully excised by an endonasal endoscopic transmaxillary transpterygoid approach.

Conclusion: The occurrence of a nasal glioma in Meckel's cave an adult is very rare. Considering the deep skull base location, endonasal endoscopic surgery provides a minimal access technique to reach this location with excellent results.

背景:鼻胶质瘤或胶质异位是一种罕见的胚胎学异常,预示着它在出生后不久或儿童时期就存在。鼻胶质瘤在成人中是非常罕见的,通常是无症状的,在成人梅克尔氏洞中发生鼻胶质瘤以前没有报道过。病例报告:作者遇到了一个偶然诊断的梅克尔的洞穴鼻胶质瘤在一个40岁的男性成功切除鼻内窥镜经上颌窦入路。结论:成人梅克尔氏洞鼻胶质瘤的发生极为罕见。考虑到深颅底位置,鼻内窥镜手术提供了一个最小的进入技术,达到这个位置,效果很好。
{"title":"Endoscopic management of a rare case of nasal glioma in Meckel's cave in an adult: case report.","authors":"M K Kasliwal,&nbsp;V K Anand,&nbsp;E Lavi,&nbsp;T H Schwartz","doi":"10.1055/s-0030-1262812","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1262812","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nasal glioma or glial heterotopia is a rare embryologic anomaly that heralds its presence shortly after birth or in childhood. Nasal glioma in an adult is very rare, often asymptomatic and the occurrence of nasal glioma in Meckel's cave in an adult has not been previously reported.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>The authors encountered a case of an incidentally diagnosed Meckel's cave nasal glioma in a 40-year-old male which was successfully excised by an endonasal endoscopic transmaxillary transpterygoid approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The occurrence of a nasal glioma in Meckel's cave an adult is very rare. Considering the deep skull base location, endonasal endoscopic surgery provides a minimal access technique to reach this location with excellent results.</p>","PeriodicalId":49808,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0030-1262812","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29514892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Value of endoscopic third ventriculostomy instead of shunt revision. 内镜下第三脑室造瘘代替分流翻修的价值。
Pub Date : 2010-08-01 Epub Date: 2010-12-03 DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1268415
J Baldauf, M J Fritsch, J Oertel, M R Gaab, H Schröder

Background: The purpose of this study was to analyze the value of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) in patients with shunt malfunction or infection.

Methods: ETV was performed in 263 patients in Greifswald between 1993 and 2008. We reviewed the data of all patients with previous shunts who underwent ETV instead of shunt revision. The procedure was successful when subsequent shunt implantation was avoided.

Results: Neuroendoscopy was performed in 30/31 previously shunted patients. The average age of the patients was 26.4 years ranging from 6 months to 69 years (male/female ratio: 18/12). The primary cause of hydrocephalus was aqueductal stenosis in 11, myelomeningocele in 5, posthemorrhagic in 5, postmeningitic in 3, tumor-related obstruction in 2, supracerebellar arachnoid cyst in 2, posttraumatic in 1 and a complex congenital hydrocephalus in 1. ETV was successful in 18 patients (60%) with a mean follow-up period of 51 months. 12 patients (40%) did not benefit from ETV and required a permanent shunt. 11 of them received the shunt within 3 months after failed ETV. ETV failed in all children <2 years of age. A benefit of ETV without subsequent shunt procedures was recognized in 18/27 (66.7%) with an obstructive and 0/3 (0%) patients with a communicating cause of the hydrocephalus. Complications occurred in 2 patients (6.7%).

Conclusions: ETV is a potential treatment option when shunts fail in patients with obstructive hydrocephalus. If MR imaging shows no obstruction, a shunt revision is recommended. Patients with a posthemorrhagic and postmeningitic hydrocephalus are poor candidates for ETV.

背景:本研究的目的是分析内镜下第三脑室造口术(ETV)在分流管功能障碍或感染患者中的价值。方法:1993 ~ 2008年在Greifswald对263例患者行ETV手术。我们回顾了所有既往分流术患者的资料,这些患者接受了ETV而不是分流术翻修。手术成功,避免了后续的分流植入。结果:30/31例既往分流患者行神经内窥镜检查。患者平均年龄26.4岁,年龄范围6个月~ 69岁(男女比:18/12)。脑积水的主要病因为输水管狭窄11例,脊膜膨出5例,出血后5例,脑膜后3例,肿瘤相关梗阻2例,小脑上蛛网膜囊肿2例,创伤后1例,复杂先天性脑积水1例。ETV在18例(60%)患者中获得成功,平均随访51个月。12例患者(40%)没有从ETV中获益,需要永久性分流术。其中11例在ETV失败后3个月内接受了分流术。结论:当梗阻性脑积水患者分流失败时,ETV是一种潜在的治疗选择。如果磁共振成像显示没有梗阻,建议行分流手术。出血后和脑膜后脑积水患者不适合接受ETV治疗。
{"title":"Value of endoscopic third ventriculostomy instead of shunt revision.","authors":"J Baldauf,&nbsp;M J Fritsch,&nbsp;J Oertel,&nbsp;M R Gaab,&nbsp;H Schröder","doi":"10.1055/s-0030-1268415","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1268415","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to analyze the value of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) in patients with shunt malfunction or infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ETV was performed in 263 patients in Greifswald between 1993 and 2008. We reviewed the data of all patients with previous shunts who underwent ETV instead of shunt revision. The procedure was successful when subsequent shunt implantation was avoided.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neuroendoscopy was performed in 30/31 previously shunted patients. The average age of the patients was 26.4 years ranging from 6 months to 69 years (male/female ratio: 18/12). The primary cause of hydrocephalus was aqueductal stenosis in 11, myelomeningocele in 5, posthemorrhagic in 5, postmeningitic in 3, tumor-related obstruction in 2, supracerebellar arachnoid cyst in 2, posttraumatic in 1 and a complex congenital hydrocephalus in 1. ETV was successful in 18 patients (60%) with a mean follow-up period of 51 months. 12 patients (40%) did not benefit from ETV and required a permanent shunt. 11 of them received the shunt within 3 months after failed ETV. ETV failed in all children <2 years of age. A benefit of ETV without subsequent shunt procedures was recognized in 18/27 (66.7%) with an obstructive and 0/3 (0%) patients with a communicating cause of the hydrocephalus. Complications occurred in 2 patients (6.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ETV is a potential treatment option when shunts fail in patients with obstructive hydrocephalus. If MR imaging shows no obstruction, a shunt revision is recommended. Patients with a posthemorrhagic and postmeningitic hydrocephalus are poor candidates for ETV.</p>","PeriodicalId":49808,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0030-1268415","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29514887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31
Minimally invasive approach for far lateral disc herniations: results from 20 patients. 微创入路治疗远外侧椎间盘突出:附20例分析。
Pub Date : 2010-06-01 Epub Date: 2010-08-31 DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1249102
J-M Voyadzis, V C Gala, F A Sandhu, R G Fessler
Background: Method: Results and Discussion:
背景:远外侧腰椎间盘突出症虽然不常见,但却是引起疼痛性神经根综合征的重要原因,通常伴有运动或感觉缺陷。由于不熟悉外侧解剖结构和相邻骨结构的重要性,特别是关节间部和小关节,手术治疗在技术上具有挑战性。方法:治疗远外侧腰椎间盘突出症的传统入路包括中线切口、宽外侧骨膜下暴露和部分切除这些可能导致医源性不稳定的结构。椎间盘外侧腔室的旁位入路是有利的,因为它直接针对病理。使用最近开发的微创牵开系统减少组织剥离和失血,提高术后恢复。结果和讨论:我们报道了20例采用微创肌裂入路行远外侧椎间盘切除术的患者。
{"title":"Minimally invasive approach for far lateral disc herniations: results from 20 patients.","authors":"J-M Voyadzis,&nbsp;V C Gala,&nbsp;F A Sandhu,&nbsp;R G Fessler","doi":"10.1055/s-0030-1249102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1249102","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Method: Results and Discussion:","PeriodicalId":49808,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0030-1249102","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29281005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23
Video-assisted thoracoscopic removal of ossified posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in the thoracic spine: a case report. 电视胸腔镜下切除胸椎骨化后纵韧带1例。
Pub Date : 2010-06-01 Epub Date: 2010-08-31 DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1249703
J S Kim, S H Lee, J Y Seong, K H Kim, B Jung

Background: When the transthoracic approach is used for the treatment of a thoracic ossified posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), there could be a lot of operative risks, morbidity, and mortality for the patient.

Case report: A 65-year-old female manifested back pain and tingling sensations in both legs due to OPLL at the T6-7 level. A thoracoscopic procedure was performed to remove the OPLL, achieving complete decompression of thoracic cord. The symptoms were relieved and the patient was discharged on the sixth day after the operation.

Conclusions: A minimally invasive procedure using the thoracoscopic technique could be a good alternative option in selected cases when a conventional transthoracic approach is impossible due to the patient's general condition.

背景:经胸入路治疗胸后纵韧带骨化(OPLL)时,可能存在很多手术风险、发病率和死亡率。病例报告:一名65岁女性,由于T6-7节段OPLL,表现为背部疼痛和双腿刺痛感。在胸腔镜下切除上锁韧带,完成胸索的完全减压。术后第6天症状缓解出院。结论:由于患者的一般情况,当传统的经胸入路不可行时,采用胸腔镜技术进行微创手术可能是一个很好的选择。
{"title":"Video-assisted thoracoscopic removal of ossified posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in the thoracic spine: a case report.","authors":"J S Kim,&nbsp;S H Lee,&nbsp;J Y Seong,&nbsp;K H Kim,&nbsp;B Jung","doi":"10.1055/s-0030-1249703","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1249703","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When the transthoracic approach is used for the treatment of a thoracic ossified posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), there could be a lot of operative risks, morbidity, and mortality for the patient.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 65-year-old female manifested back pain and tingling sensations in both legs due to OPLL at the T6-7 level. A thoracoscopic procedure was performed to remove the OPLL, achieving complete decompression of thoracic cord. The symptoms were relieved and the patient was discharged on the sixth day after the operation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A minimally invasive procedure using the thoracoscopic technique could be a good alternative option in selected cases when a conventional transthoracic approach is impossible due to the patient's general condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":49808,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0030-1249703","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29281008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Minimally invasive spine surgery. 微创脊柱外科。
Pub Date : 2010-06-01 Epub Date: 2010-08-31 DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1263202
P Tanner
A new volume in the Minimally Invasive Orthopaedic Surgery series, Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery weighs the pros and cons of today’s open versus minimally invasive techniques, allowing you to choose the approaches that will best meet your patients’ needs. In each chapter, accomplished experts describe the advantages, indications, setup, technical aspects, and problem areas associated with a given minimally invasive procedure, including critiques from surgeons who favor a standard open approach – to give you a balanced, objective foundation for surgical decision making.
{"title":"Minimally invasive spine surgery.","authors":"P Tanner","doi":"10.1055/s-0030-1263202","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1263202","url":null,"abstract":"A new volume in the Minimally Invasive Orthopaedic Surgery series, Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery weighs the pros and cons of today’s open versus minimally invasive techniques, allowing you to choose the approaches that will best meet your patients’ needs. In each chapter, accomplished experts describe the advantages, indications, setup, technical aspects, and problem areas associated with a given minimally invasive procedure, including critiques from surgeons who favor a standard open approach – to give you a balanced, objective foundation for surgical decision making.","PeriodicalId":49808,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0030-1263202","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29277806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 182
Posterior dynamic stabilization in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease: 2-year follow-up. 后路动态稳定治疗腰椎间盘退行性疾病:2年随访。
Pub Date : 2010-06-01 Epub Date: 2010-08-31 DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262810
T Oktenoglu, A F Ozer, M Sasani, T Kaner, N Canbulat, O Ercelen, A C Sarioglu

Background: A prospective pilot study was designed to evaluate the role of a posterior dynamic stabilization technique in the surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease. Posterior dynamic stabilization with a hinged screw is a new concept in the surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine. The traditional surgical treatment is to apply a fusion procedure. However, numerous reports showed unsatisfactory clinical outcomes even when patients have satisfactory radiological outcomes following fusion procedures.

Material and methods: The study included patients who were surgically treated with a dynamic stabilization technique due to painful degenerative disc disease. Clinical and radiological findings for the 20 participating patients were analyzed in a 2-year follow-up study. Preoperative and postoperative data at the 3 (rd), 12 (th) and 24 (th) month were collected for both clinical and radiological outcomes. Statistical analyses between preoperative and postoperative data were performed using the Wilcoxon test.

Results: The clinical outcome measurements (VAS, ODI) showed significant improvement in all postoperative measurements compared to preoperative values. The mean preoperative visual analogue score (VAS, 7.9) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI 59.2) significantly decreased to 0.8 for VAS and 9.2 for ODI, at 2 years post-operation (p<0.05). The radiological studies showed no significant changes between pre- and postoperative values, in all parameters. There was no mortality or morbidity.

Conclusions: The results of this pilot study are encouraging. Dynamic stabilization may be an effective technique in the surgical treatment of painful degenerative disc disease. A larger series study, with longer follow-up periods and with control groups is needed to determine the success and safety of posterior dynamic stabilization in the surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease.

背景:一项前瞻性先导研究旨在评估后路动态稳定技术在退行性椎间盘疾病手术治疗中的作用。后路动力稳定与铰链螺钉是手术治疗腰椎退变性椎间盘疾病的新概念。传统的外科治疗是采用融合手术。然而,许多报告显示,即使患者在融合手术后放射学结果令人满意,临床结果也不令人满意。材料和方法:该研究纳入了因疼痛的退行性椎间盘疾病而采用动态稳定技术进行手术治疗的患者。在为期2年的随访研究中,对20名参与研究的患者的临床和放射学结果进行了分析。收集术前和术后3(3)、12(12)和24(24)个月的临床和影像学数据。术前和术后数据采用Wilcoxon检验进行统计学分析。结果:临床结果测量(VAS, ODI)显示,与术前相比,术后所有测量值均有显著改善。术后2年,术前平均视觉模拟评分(VAS)为7.9,Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)为59.2,VAS为0.8,ODI为9.2(结论:本初步研究结果令人鼓舞。动态稳定可能是手术治疗疼痛性退行性椎间盘疾病的有效技术。需要更大的系列研究、更长的随访期和对照组来确定后路动态稳定在退行性椎间盘疾病手术治疗中的成功和安全性。
{"title":"Posterior dynamic stabilization in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease: 2-year follow-up.","authors":"T Oktenoglu,&nbsp;A F Ozer,&nbsp;M Sasani,&nbsp;T Kaner,&nbsp;N Canbulat,&nbsp;O Ercelen,&nbsp;A C Sarioglu","doi":"10.1055/s-0030-1262810","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1262810","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A prospective pilot study was designed to evaluate the role of a posterior dynamic stabilization technique in the surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease. Posterior dynamic stabilization with a hinged screw is a new concept in the surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine. The traditional surgical treatment is to apply a fusion procedure. However, numerous reports showed unsatisfactory clinical outcomes even when patients have satisfactory radiological outcomes following fusion procedures.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included patients who were surgically treated with a dynamic stabilization technique due to painful degenerative disc disease. Clinical and radiological findings for the 20 participating patients were analyzed in a 2-year follow-up study. Preoperative and postoperative data at the 3 (rd), 12 (th) and 24 (th) month were collected for both clinical and radiological outcomes. Statistical analyses between preoperative and postoperative data were performed using the Wilcoxon test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical outcome measurements (VAS, ODI) showed significant improvement in all postoperative measurements compared to preoperative values. The mean preoperative visual analogue score (VAS, 7.9) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI 59.2) significantly decreased to 0.8 for VAS and 9.2 for ODI, at 2 years post-operation (p<0.05). The radiological studies showed no significant changes between pre- and postoperative values, in all parameters. There was no mortality or morbidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this pilot study are encouraging. Dynamic stabilization may be an effective technique in the surgical treatment of painful degenerative disc disease. A larger series study, with longer follow-up periods and with control groups is needed to determine the success and safety of posterior dynamic stabilization in the surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":49808,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0030-1262810","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29281003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23
Comment to the article: "Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial". 对文章“管状椎间盘切除术与传统微椎间盘切除术治疗坐骨神经痛:一项随机对照试验”的评论。
Pub Date : 2010-06-01 Epub Date: 2010-09-07 DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1263198
Roger Härtl
Arts MP et al. Tubular Discectomy vs. Conventional Microdiscectomy ... Minim Invas Neurosurg 2010; 53: 95–96 the underlying hypothesis for this study was fl awed. A meaningful trial would have compared surgical procedures where diff erences in surgical technique are likely to actually make a clinically relevant diff erence – for tubular surgery this would be a comparison between tubular lumbar fusion vs. open surgery, as has been shown by several case series and comparative studies [3 – 11] . For example, a recent study from Asia demonstrated signifi cantly reduced muscle injury in a group of patients undergoing MISS fusion vs. those undergoing open surgery [12] . The lack of benefi t from tubular discectomy over conventional surgery does not mean that tubular surgery would not have a signifi cant advantage when comparing potentially much more invasive procedures. The concerning fi nding in the present study was that patients undergoing tubular discectomy actually did worse than conventional surgery in regards to selfreported leg and back pain and recovery. The authors are not able to explain this surprising result. They state that the length of the incision was the same in both groups; also other parameters such as the amount of disc removed and blood loss were very similar between groups. The main stated diff erence was the fact that the tubular procedures were done using the operating microscope while surgical loops (providing less magnifi cation) were used primarily for the conventional discectomy. It appears unlikely to us that the use of the microscope with tubular discectomy should be associated with a worse outcome, as their study suggests. Assuming that patients are adequately randomized between groups some of the reasons for worse surgical outcome could be problems with surgeon experience / level of training and limited or inadequate surgical exposure / visualization of the pathology at the time of surgery. Both these concerns cannot be excluded in this manuscript and actually seem likely. The authors state that the “ participating neurosurgeons had broad experience in both techniques ” . In our experience this is unlikely since most surgeons decide at some point in their career to go with either one or the other surgical technique. As demonstrated in our publications a signifi cant learning curve is associated with tubular discectomy and it seems unlikely that surgeons would go back and forth between surgical techniques (1,2). The fact that tubular discectomies took Comment to the article:
{"title":"Comment to the article: \"Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial\".","authors":"Roger Härtl","doi":"10.1055/s-0030-1263198","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1263198","url":null,"abstract":"Arts MP et al. Tubular Discectomy vs. Conventional Microdiscectomy ... Minim Invas Neurosurg 2010; 53: 95–96 the underlying hypothesis for this study was fl awed. A meaningful trial would have compared surgical procedures where diff erences in surgical technique are likely to actually make a clinically relevant diff erence – for tubular surgery this would be a comparison between tubular lumbar fusion vs. open surgery, as has been shown by several case series and comparative studies [3 – 11] . For example, a recent study from Asia demonstrated signifi cantly reduced muscle injury in a group of patients undergoing MISS fusion vs. those undergoing open surgery [12] . The lack of benefi t from tubular discectomy over conventional surgery does not mean that tubular surgery would not have a signifi cant advantage when comparing potentially much more invasive procedures. The concerning fi nding in the present study was that patients undergoing tubular discectomy actually did worse than conventional surgery in regards to selfreported leg and back pain and recovery. The authors are not able to explain this surprising result. They state that the length of the incision was the same in both groups; also other parameters such as the amount of disc removed and blood loss were very similar between groups. The main stated diff erence was the fact that the tubular procedures were done using the operating microscope while surgical loops (providing less magnifi cation) were used primarily for the conventional discectomy. It appears unlikely to us that the use of the microscope with tubular discectomy should be associated with a worse outcome, as their study suggests. Assuming that patients are adequately randomized between groups some of the reasons for worse surgical outcome could be problems with surgeon experience / level of training and limited or inadequate surgical exposure / visualization of the pathology at the time of surgery. Both these concerns cannot be excluded in this manuscript and actually seem likely. The authors state that the “ participating neurosurgeons had broad experience in both techniques ” . In our experience this is unlikely since most surgeons decide at some point in their career to go with either one or the other surgical technique. As demonstrated in our publications a signifi cant learning curve is associated with tubular discectomy and it seems unlikely that surgeons would go back and forth between surgical techniques (1,2). The fact that tubular discectomies took Comment to the article:","PeriodicalId":49808,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0030-1263198","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29292563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Reply to the comment of R. Härtl: 回复R. Härtl的评论:
Pub Date : 2010-06-01 DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1266154
M. Arts, W. Peul
Arts MP et al. Tubular Discectomy vs. Conventional Microdiscectomy ... Minim Invas Neurosurg 2010; 53: 96 The fact that tubular discectomy was not superior to conventional surgery was not due to inexperience of surgeons, as H ä rtl and colleagues suggest. Surgeons needed to perform at least 15 procedures before they could participate in our trial [1] . Moreover, we found a tendency of worse results in more experienced surgeons. We strongly disagree with the suggestion to exclude the patients with recurrent disk herniation from primary analysis. First, in an intention-to-treat analysis, by defi nition, the primary endpoint should include all patients with all possible reasons for an unfavourable outcome. Moreover, recurrent disk herniation might very well be an important reason for diff erence in pain scores between the groups. To decide on new guidelines, the fi nal clinical result of both groups, including all its determinants, is crucial. In our opinion, excluding these patients would certainly bias the primary outcome. We agree with the statement that ‘ the lack of benefi t from tubular discectomy over conventional surgery does not mean that tubular surgery would not have a signifi cant advantage when comparing potentially much more invasive proceReply to the comment of R. H ä rtl:
艺术MP等。管状椎间盘切除术与传统显微椎间盘切除术…微创神经外科2010;53:96管状椎间盘切除术并不优于常规手术,这并不是因为外科医生缺乏经验,H ä rtl及其同事认为。外科医生在参与我们的试验之前至少需要进行15次手术。此外,我们发现经验丰富的外科医生的结果往往更差。我们强烈反对将复发性椎间盘突出患者排除在初步分析之外的建议。首先,在意向治疗分析中,根据定义,主要终点应包括所有可能导致不良结果的患者。此外,复发性椎间盘突出很可能是组间疼痛评分差异的重要原因。决定新的指导方针,两组的最终临床结果,包括其所有决定因素,是至关重要的。在我们看来,排除这些患者肯定会使主要结果产生偏差。我们同意“管状椎间盘切除术与传统手术相比缺乏益处并不意味着管状椎间盘切除术在与r.h ä rtl的评论相比可能更具侵入性时没有显著优势”的说法。
{"title":"Reply to the comment of R. Härtl:","authors":"M. Arts, W. Peul","doi":"10.1055/s-0030-1266154","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1266154","url":null,"abstract":"Arts MP et al. Tubular Discectomy vs. Conventional Microdiscectomy ... Minim Invas Neurosurg 2010; 53: 96 The fact that tubular discectomy was not superior to conventional surgery was not due to inexperience of surgeons, as H ä rtl and colleagues suggest. Surgeons needed to perform at least 15 procedures before they could participate in our trial [1] . Moreover, we found a tendency of worse results in more experienced surgeons. We strongly disagree with the suggestion to exclude the patients with recurrent disk herniation from primary analysis. First, in an intention-to-treat analysis, by defi nition, the primary endpoint should include all patients with all possible reasons for an unfavourable outcome. Moreover, recurrent disk herniation might very well be an important reason for diff erence in pain scores between the groups. To decide on new guidelines, the fi nal clinical result of both groups, including all its determinants, is crucial. In our opinion, excluding these patients would certainly bias the primary outcome. We agree with the statement that ‘ the lack of benefi t from tubular discectomy over conventional surgery does not mean that tubular surgery would not have a signifi cant advantage when comparing potentially much more invasive proceReply to the comment of R. H ä rtl:","PeriodicalId":49808,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82419867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
High-definition imaging in spinal neuroendoscopy. 脊髓神经内窥镜的高清成像。
Pub Date : 2010-06-01 Epub Date: 2010-08-31 DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262811
M Philipps, J Oertel

Background: Spinal endoscopy is still under controversial discussion. An often acclaimed critic is the poor endoscopic image quality in comparison with the microscope. Since high-definition digital cameras have recently been introduced into spinal neuroendoscopy, the aim of the current study is to examine whether superior image quality has a relevant impact on intraoperativen orientation.

Material and methods: A lumbar endoscopic discectomy was recorded simultaneously in High-Definition resolution (HD) and Standard-Definition resolution (SD). 10 experienced spinal surgeons were asked to identify predefined as well as not predefined anatomic structures in HD and SD resolution. Additionally, the video quality was rated with grades from 1 ("very good") to 6 ("poor").

Results: Out of 14 predefined structures an average of 7.8+/-3.3 structures (55.71%) were identified in HD, 4.4+/-3.2 structures (31.43%) in SD (p=0.03). Out of 14 not predefined anatomical structures, 5.9+/-3.6 were correctly identified in HD, 2.6+/-2.5 in SD (p=0.05). Misinterpretation of structures occurred in 1.4+/-1 cases in HD, compared to 3+/-2.2 in SD (p=0.05). Subjective impression of video quality was rated 2.2 ("good") for HD, 3.0 ("satisfactory") for SD (p=0.03).

Conclusion: HD in endoscopic discectomy accounts for a significantly more reliable identification of anatomic structures in freeze-images in comparison with standard definition images. Additionally, the subjective impression of video quality is significantly better in HD. This superior identification of structures might contribute to improve intraoperative orientation in endoscopic neurosurgery using high definition quality technology.

背景:脊柱内窥镜检查仍处于有争议的讨论中。一个经常受到好评的批评是与显微镜相比,内窥镜图像质量差。由于高清数码相机最近被引入脊髓神经内窥镜检查,本研究的目的是研究优越的图像质量是否对术中定位有相关影响。材料和方法:采用高清分辨率(HD)和标清分辨率(SD)同时记录腰椎内窥镜椎间盘切除术。10名经验丰富的脊柱外科医生被要求在高清和标清分辨率下识别预定义和非预定义的解剖结构。此外,视频质量被评为从1(“非常好”)到6(“差”)。结果:在14个预定义结构中,HD平均鉴定出7.8个+/-3.3个结构(55.71%),SD平均鉴定出4.4个+/-3.2个结构(31.43%)(p=0.03)。在14个非预定义解剖结构中,HD正确识别5.9+/-3.6,SD正确识别2.6+/-2.5 (p=0.05)。HD患者的结构误解发生率为1.4+/-1例,SD患者为3+/-2.2例(p=0.05)。对高清视频质量的主观印象为2.2(“好”),标清为3.0(“满意”)(p=0.03)。结论:与标准清晰度图像相比,高清在内镜下椎间盘切除术中对冷冻图像的解剖结构识别更加可靠。此外,高清视频质量的主观印象也明显更好。这种优越的结构识别可能有助于提高内镜神经外科手术中使用高清晰度技术的术中定位。
{"title":"High-definition imaging in spinal neuroendoscopy.","authors":"M Philipps,&nbsp;J Oertel","doi":"10.1055/s-0030-1262811","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1262811","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal endoscopy is still under controversial discussion. An often acclaimed critic is the poor endoscopic image quality in comparison with the microscope. Since high-definition digital cameras have recently been introduced into spinal neuroendoscopy, the aim of the current study is to examine whether superior image quality has a relevant impact on intraoperativen orientation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A lumbar endoscopic discectomy was recorded simultaneously in High-Definition resolution (HD) and Standard-Definition resolution (SD). 10 experienced spinal surgeons were asked to identify predefined as well as not predefined anatomic structures in HD and SD resolution. Additionally, the video quality was rated with grades from 1 (\"very good\") to 6 (\"poor\").</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 14 predefined structures an average of 7.8+/-3.3 structures (55.71%) were identified in HD, 4.4+/-3.2 structures (31.43%) in SD (p=0.03). Out of 14 not predefined anatomical structures, 5.9+/-3.6 were correctly identified in HD, 2.6+/-2.5 in SD (p=0.05). Misinterpretation of structures occurred in 1.4+/-1 cases in HD, compared to 3+/-2.2 in SD (p=0.05). Subjective impression of video quality was rated 2.2 (\"good\") for HD, 3.0 (\"satisfactory\") for SD (p=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HD in endoscopic discectomy accounts for a significantly more reliable identification of anatomic structures in freeze-images in comparison with standard definition images. Additionally, the subjective impression of video quality is significantly better in HD. This superior identification of structures might contribute to improve intraoperative orientation in endoscopic neurosurgery using high definition quality technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":49808,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0030-1262811","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29282063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
期刊
Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1