Journal of Thoracic Imaging最新文献

A multitude of lung disorders ranging from congenital and genetic anomalies to iatrogenic complications can affect the neonate or the infant within the first year of life. Neonatal and infant chest imaging, predominantly by plain radiography and computed tomography, is frequently employed to aid in diagnosis and management; however, these disorders can be challenging to differentiate due to their broad-ranging, and frequently overlapping radiographic features. A systematic and practical approach to imaging interpretation which includes recognition of radiologic patterns, utilization of commonly accepted nomenclature and classification, as well as interpretation of imaging findings in conjunction with clinical history can not only assist radiologists to suggest the diagnosis, but also aid clinicians in management planning. The contents of this article were endorsed by the leadership of both the World Federation of Pediatric Imaging (WFPI), and the International Society of Pediatric Thoracic Imaging (ISPTI).

Disorders of the lungs and airways are among the most common indications for diagnostic imaging in infants and children. Traditionally, chest radiograph has been the first-line imaging test for detecting these disorders and when cross-sectional imaging is necessary, computed tomography (CT) has typically been the next step. However, due to concerns about the potentially harmful effects of ionizing radiation, pediatric imaging in general has begun to shift away from CT toward magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a preferred modality. Several unique technical challenges of chest MRI, including motion artifact from respiratory and cardiac motion as well as low signal-to-noise ratios secondary to relatively low proton density in the lung have slowed this shift in thoracic imaging. However, technical advances in MRI in recent years, including developments in non-Cartesian MRI data sampling methods such as radial, spiral, and PROPELLER imaging and the development of ultrashort TE and zero TE sequences that render CT-like high-quality imaging with minimal motion artifact have allowed for a shift to MRI for evaluation of lung and large airways in centers with specialized expertise. This article presents a practical approach for radiologists in current practice to begin to consider MRI for evaluation of the pediatric lung and large airways and begin to implement it in their practices. The current role for MRI in the evaluation of disorders of the pediatric lung and large airways is reviewed, and example cases are presented. Challenges for MRI of the lung and large airways in children are discussed, practical tips for patient preparation including sedation are described, and imaging techniques suitable for current clinical practice are presented.

Purpose: The primary imaging modality for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is echocardiography supplemented by electrocardiography (ECG)-gated cardiac computed tomography (CT) angiography. However, we have recently encountered patients with MVP who were initially identified on non-ECG-gated enhanced chest CT. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of non-ECG-gated enhanced chest CT to predict the presence of MVP.

Patients and methods: Of 92 patients (surgically confirmed MVP who underwent non-ECG-gated chest CT), 27 patients were excluded for motion artifact or insufficient surgical correlation, and 65 patients were ultimately included. As a control, 65 patients with dyspnea and without MVP (non-ECG-gated chest CT and echocardiography were performed within 1 month) were randomly selected. We retrospectively analyzed an asymmetric double line sign on axial CT images for the presence of MVP. The asymmetric double line sign was defined as the presence of a linear structure, not located in the plane traversing the mitral annulus.

Results: Use of the asymmetric double line sign to predict MVP on non-ECG-gated CT showed modest sensitivity, high specificity, modest negative predictive value, and high positive predictive value of 59% (38/65), 99% (64/65), 70% (64/91), and 97% (38/39), respectively.

Conclusion: The asymmetric double line sign on non-ECG-gated enhanced chest CT may be a valuable finding to predict the presence of MVP. Familiarity with this CT finding may lead to prompt diagnosis and proper management of MVP.

Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) are a group of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases of unclear etiology and are distinguished from diffuse parenchymal lung diseases of known cause, such as connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung diseases or hypersensitivity pneumonitis by history, physical exam, imaging, serologic testing, and, when necessary, histopathology. The 2013 American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines are the most widely accepted classification of IIPs and include the following diagnoses: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, acute interstitial pneumonia, idiopathic lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia, idiopathic pleuro-parenchymal fibroelastosis, respiratory bronchiolitis-interstitial lung disease, and desquamative interstitial pneumonia. The gold standard for diagnosis of IIP involves multidisciplinary discussion among pulmonologists, radiologists, and pathologists. The focus of this review will be to discuss the imaging features of the most common IIPs and the role of multidisciplinary discussion as the gold standard for diagnosis.

Radiologists fulfill a vital role in the multidisciplinary care provided to patients with interstitial lung diseases and other diffuse parenchymal lung disorders. The diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases hinges on the consensus of clinical, radiology, and pathology medical subspecialists, but additional expertise from rheumatology, immunology, or hematology can be invaluable. The thin-section computed tomography (CT) features of lung involvement informs the diagnostic approach. Radiologists should be familiar with radiologic methods (including inspiratory/expiratory and prone imaging) and be well versed in the recognition of the CT features of fibrosis, assessment of the overall pattern of lung involvement, and classification according to the latest guidelines. We present a case-based review that highlights examples wherein CT features and subspecialist radiologist interpretation informed the multidisciplinary team consensus diagnosis and care pathways.