首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Discussion to: Early real-world experience monitoring circulating tumor DNA in resected early-stage non–small cell lung cancer 讨论到:监测切除早期非小细胞肺癌患者循环肿瘤 DNA 的早期实际经验。
IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.07.055
{"title":"Discussion to: Early real-world experience monitoring circulating tumor DNA in resected early-stage non–small cell lung cancer","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.07.055","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.07.055","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"168 5","pages":"Pages 1360-1361"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Discussion to: Should sampling of 3 N2 stations be a quality metric for curative resection of stage I lung cancer? 讨论到:取样 3 个 N2 站是否应作为 I 期肺癌根治性切除术的质量指标?
IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.05.020
{"title":"Discussion to: Should sampling of 3 N2 stations be a quality metric for curative resection of stage I lung cancer?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.05.020","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.05.020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"168 5","pages":"Pages 1346-1348"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lung Transplantation After Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion in High-Risk Recipients: A Propensity Matched Analysis of a National Database. 高风险受者体内肺灌注后的肺移植:全国数据库倾向匹配分析》。
IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.10.041
Ernest G Chan, Rachel L Deitz, Jack K Donohue, John P Ryan, Yota Suzuki, Masashi Furukawa, Kentaro Noda, Pablo G Sanchez

Purpose: We report outcomes associated with EVLP lungs in high-risk lung transplant recipients utilizing a national database.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the UNOS Database (1/1/2018-3/31/2024). High-risk status was defined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure > 35 mmHg, lung retransplantation, or bridge to transplant. In addition to univariable analysis, propensity score matched analysis was performed on predictors of donor and recipient characteristics.

Results: Risk of dying on the waitlist was significantly higher for high-risk candidates (HR: 1.69 [1.51 - 1.89], p < 0.001). Following matching, 203 EVLP cases were matched to 609 standard procurement recipients. The EVLP group was associated with higher rates of postoperative acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (27% vs 16%, p < 0.001), higher mortality on index admission (13% vs. 8%, p = 0.04), and longer length of stay (29 vs 25 days, p = 0.006). EVLP modality was associated with survival time (p < 0.001) with portable EVLP having significantly shorter survival (2.7 years) relative to standard cases (4.7 years, p < 0.02). A subgroup analysis found that this survival effect was limited to bridge and retransplant recipients.

Conclusions: EVLP lungs were associated with higher rates of postoperative AKI and portable EVLP was associated with shorter survival in high-risk lung transplant recipients. However, given the high waitlist mortality in this candidate population, EVLP lungs should still be considered an alternative.

目的:我们利用国家数据库报告了高风险肺移植受者EVLP肺的相关结果:我们对 UNOS 数据库(1/1/2018-3/31/2024)进行了回顾性分析。高风险状态定义为平均肺动脉压> 35 mmHg、肺再移植或移植桥。除了单变量分析外,还对供体和受体特征的预测因素进行了倾向得分匹配分析:结果:高风险候选者在等待名单上死亡的风险明显更高(HR:1.69 [1.51 - 1.89],P < 0.001)。经过配对,203 个 EVLP 病例与 609 个标准接受者进行了配对。EVLP组需要肾脏替代治疗的术后急性肾损伤发生率较高(27% vs. 16%,p < 0.001),入院时死亡率较高(13% vs. 8%,p = 0.04),住院时间较长(29天 vs. 25天,p = 0.006)。EVLP模式与存活时间相关(p < 0.001),便携式EVLP的存活时间(2.7年)明显短于标准病例(4.7年,p < 0.02)。亚组分析发现,这种存活率影响仅限于桥接和再移植受者:结论:EVLP肺与较高的术后AKI发生率有关,便携式EVLP与高风险肺移植受者较短的生存期有关。然而,考虑到这一候选人群的高等待死亡率,EVLP肺仍应被视为一种替代方案。
{"title":"Lung Transplantation After Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion in High-Risk Recipients: A Propensity Matched Analysis of a National Database.","authors":"Ernest G Chan, Rachel L Deitz, Jack K Donohue, John P Ryan, Yota Suzuki, Masashi Furukawa, Kentaro Noda, Pablo G Sanchez","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.10.041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.10.041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We report outcomes associated with EVLP lungs in high-risk lung transplant recipients utilizing a national database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of the UNOS Database (1/1/2018-3/31/2024). High-risk status was defined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure > 35 mmHg, lung retransplantation, or bridge to transplant. In addition to univariable analysis, propensity score matched analysis was performed on predictors of donor and recipient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Risk of dying on the waitlist was significantly higher for high-risk candidates (HR: 1.69 [1.51 - 1.89], p < 0.001). Following matching, 203 EVLP cases were matched to 609 standard procurement recipients. The EVLP group was associated with higher rates of postoperative acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (27% vs 16%, p < 0.001), higher mortality on index admission (13% vs. 8%, p = 0.04), and longer length of stay (29 vs 25 days, p = 0.006). EVLP modality was associated with survival time (p < 0.001) with portable EVLP having significantly shorter survival (2.7 years) relative to standard cases (4.7 years, p < 0.02). A subgroup analysis found that this survival effect was limited to bridge and retransplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EVLP lungs were associated with higher rates of postoperative AKI and portable EVLP was associated with shorter survival in high-risk lung transplant recipients. However, given the high waitlist mortality in this candidate population, EVLP lungs should still be considered an alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142569551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
New perspectives on tracheal resection for COVID-19–related stenosis: A propensity score matching analysis 气管切除治疗 COVID-19 相关狭窄的新视角:倾向得分匹配分析。
IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.03.028
Cecilia Menna MD , Silvia Fiorelli MD , Beatrice Trabalza Marinucci MD , Domenico Massullo MD , Antonio D'Andrilli MD , Anna Maria Ciccone MD, PhD , Claudio Andreetti MD, PhD , Giulio Maurizi MD, PhD , Camilla Vanni MD, PhD , Alessandra Siciliani MD, PhD , Matteo Tiracorrendo MD , Massimiliano Mancini MD, PhD , Federico Venuta MD , Erino Angelo Rendina MD , Mohsen Ibrahim MD, PhD

Objective

The large number of patients with COVID-19 subjected to prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation has been expected to result in a significant increase in tracheal stenosis in the next years. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare postoperative outcomes of patients who survived COVID-19 critical illness and underwent tracheal resection for postintubation/posttracheostomy tracheal stenosis with those of non–COVID-19 patients.

Methods

It was single-center, retrospective study. All consecutive patients with post-intubation/posttracheostomy tracheal stenosis who underwent tracheal resection from February 2020 to March 2022 were enrolled. A total of 147 tracheal resections were performed: 24 were in post–COVID-19 patients and 123 were in non–COVID-19 patients. A 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was performed, considering age, gender, body mass index, and length of stenosis. After matching, 2 groups of 24 patients each were identified: a post–COVID-19 group and a non–COVID group.

Results

No mortality after surgery was registered. Posttracheostomy etiology of stenosis resulted more frequently in post–COVID-19 patients (n = 20 in the post–COVID-19 group vs n = 11 in the non–COVID-19 group; P = .03), as well as intensive care unit admissions during the postoperative period (16 vs 9 patients; P = .04). Need for postoperative reintubation for glottic edema and respiratory failure was higher in the post–COVID-19 group (7 vs 2 postoperative reintubation procedures; P = .04). Postoperative dysphonia was observed in 11 (46%) patients in the post–COVID-19 group versus 4 (16%) patients in the non–COVID-19 group (P = .03).

Conclusions

Tracheal resection continues to be safe and effective in COVID-19–related tracheal stenosis scenarios. Intensive care unit admission rates and postoperative complications seem to be higher in post–COVID-19 patients who underwent tracheal resection compared with non–COVID-19 patients.
目的:大量 COVID-19 危重症患者长期接受有创机械通气,预计未来几年气管狭窄患者将大幅增加。本研究旨在评估和比较因插管后/气管造口术后气管狭窄而接受气管切除术的 COVID-19 危重症存活患者与非 COVID 患者的术后效果:这是一项单中心回顾性研究。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性研究,纳入了所有在 2020 年 2 月至 2022 年 3 月期间接受气管切除术的插管后/气管造口术后气管狭窄患者。共进行了 N=147 例气管切除术:N=24 例为后 COVID 患者,N=123 例为非 COVID 患者。考虑到年龄、性别、BMI(体重指数)和狭窄长度,进行了 1:1 倾向评分匹配分析。匹配后,确定了两组患者,每组 24 人:结果:结果:手术后无死亡病例。气管切开术后导致狭窄的病因在后 COVID 组患者中更常见(后 COVID 组 20 人 vs 非 COVID 组 11 人,P=0.03),术后入住 ICU 的患者也更常见(16 人 vs 9 人,P=0.04)。术后因声门水肿和呼吸衰竭需要再次插管的患者在术后 COVID 组更多(7 对 2,P=0.04)。COVID术后组中有11例(46%)患者术后出现发音障碍,而非COVID组中有4例(16%)患者术后出现发音障碍(P=0.03):结论:在COVID-19相关气管狭窄患者中,气管切除术仍然安全有效。与非 COVID-19 患者相比,接受气管切除术的 COVID-19 后患者的 ICU 入院率和术后并发症似乎更高。
{"title":"New perspectives on tracheal resection for COVID-19–related stenosis: A propensity score matching analysis","authors":"Cecilia Menna MD ,&nbsp;Silvia Fiorelli MD ,&nbsp;Beatrice Trabalza Marinucci MD ,&nbsp;Domenico Massullo MD ,&nbsp;Antonio D'Andrilli MD ,&nbsp;Anna Maria Ciccone MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Claudio Andreetti MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Giulio Maurizi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Camilla Vanni MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alessandra Siciliani MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Matteo Tiracorrendo MD ,&nbsp;Massimiliano Mancini MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Federico Venuta MD ,&nbsp;Erino Angelo Rendina MD ,&nbsp;Mohsen Ibrahim MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.03.028","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.03.028","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The large number of patients with COVID-19 subjected to prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation has been expected to result in a significant increase in tracheal stenosis in the next years. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare postoperative outcomes of patients who survived COVID-19 critical illness and underwent tracheal resection for postintubation/posttracheostomy tracheal stenosis with those of non–COVID-19 patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>It was single-center, retrospective study. All consecutive patients with post-intubation/posttracheostomy tracheal stenosis who underwent tracheal resection from February 2020 to March 2022 were enrolled. A total of 147 tracheal resections were performed: 24 were in post–COVID-19 patients and 123 were in non–COVID-19 patients. A 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was performed, considering age, gender, body mass index, and length of stenosis. After matching, 2 groups of 24 patients each were identified: a post–COVID-19 group and a non–COVID group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No mortality after surgery was registered. Posttracheostomy etiology of stenosis resulted more frequently in post–COVID-19 patients (n = 20 in the post–COVID-19 group vs n = 11 in the non–COVID-19 group; <em>P</em> = .03), as well as intensive care unit admissions during the postoperative period (16 vs 9 patients; <em>P</em> = .04). Need for postoperative reintubation for glottic edema and respiratory failure was higher in the post–COVID-19 group (7 vs 2 postoperative reintubation procedures; <em>P</em> = .04). Postoperative dysphonia was observed in 11 (46%) patients in the post–COVID-19 group versus 4 (16%) patients in the non–COVID-19 group (<em>P =</em> .03).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Tracheal resection continues to be safe and effective in COVID-19–related tracheal stenosis scenarios. Intensive care unit admission rates and postoperative complications seem to be higher in post–COVID-19 patients who underwent tracheal resection compared with non–COVID-19 patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"168 5","pages":"Pages 1385-1393"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140332268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Discussion to: Implantation of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device using a thoracotomy-based implant technique: Multicenter HeartMate 3 SWIFT study 讨论到:使用基于胸廓切开术的植入技术植入 HeartMate 3 左心室辅助装置:多中心HeartMate 3 SWIFT研究。
IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.03.030
{"title":"Discussion to: Implantation of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device using a thoracotomy-based implant technique: Multicenter HeartMate 3 SWIFT study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.03.030","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.03.030","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"168 5","pages":"Pages 1485-1487"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140762696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thoracic Articles in AATS Journals AATS 期刊上的胸外科文章
IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(24)00849-3
{"title":"Thoracic Articles in AATS Journals","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S0022-5223(24)00849-3","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S0022-5223(24)00849-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"168 5","pages":"Page e137"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142662000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Follow-up of bioprosthesis recipients: How long should a long-term be? 生物假体接受者的随访:长期随访应持续多久?
IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.04.032
Igor Vendramin MD, Uberto Bortolotti MD, Ugolino Livi MD
{"title":"Follow-up of bioprosthesis recipients: How long should a long-term be?","authors":"Igor Vendramin MD,&nbsp;Uberto Bortolotti MD,&nbsp;Ugolino Livi MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.04.032","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.04.032","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"168 5","pages":"Page e181"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141181137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does a high Haller index influence outcomes in pectus excavatum repair? 高哈勒指数会影响胸大肌修复术的效果吗?
IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.04.005
Rawan M. Zeineddine MD, Michael Botros MD, Kenan A. Shawwaf MD, Ryan Moosavi MD, Mohamed R. Aly MD, Juan M. Farina MD, Jesse J. Lackey CSFA, Beth A. Sandstrom RN, Dawn E. Jaroszewski MD

Objective

Severity for pectus excavatum includes Haller index (HI) > 3.25. An extremely high HI (≥8) may influence surgical approach and complications. This study reviews outcomes of patients with high HI after repair.

Methods

A single institution retrospective analysis was performed on adult patients with HI ≥ 8 undergoing pectus excavatum repairs. For outcomes, a propensity score-matched control group with a HI ≤ 4 was utilized.

Results

In total, 64 cases (mean age, 33.5 ± 10.9 years; HI, 13.1 ± 5.0; 56% women) were included. A minimally invasive repair was successful in 84%. A hybrid procedure was performed in the remaining either to repair fractures of the ribs (8 patients) and sternum (5 patients) or when osteotomy and/or cartilage resection was required (10 patients). In comparison with the matched cohort (HI ≤ 4), patients with high HI had longer operative times (171 vs 133 minutes; P < .001), more frequently required hybrid procedures (16% vs 2%; P = .005), experienced higher incidences of rib (22% vs 3%; P = .001) and sternal fractures (12% vs 0%; P = .003), and had increased repair with 3 bars (50% vs 19%; P < .001). There were no significant differences between the groups for length of hospital stay or postoperative 30-day complications.

Conclusions

Patients with an extremely high HI can be challenging cases with greater risks of fracture and need for osteotomy/cartilage resection. Despite this, minimally invasive repair techniques can be utilized in most cases without increased complications when performed by an experienced surgeon.
目的乳房下垂的严重程度包括哈勒指数(HI)> 3.25。极高的 HI(≥8)可能会影响手术方法和并发症。本研究回顾了高HI患者修复后的结果。方法对HI≥8的成年患者进行了单机构回顾性分析。结果共纳入 64 例患者(平均年龄为 33.5 ± 10.9 岁;HI 为 13.1 ± 5.0;56% 为女性)。84%的患者成功进行了微创修复。其余的患者要么是为了修复肋骨(8 例)和胸骨(5 例)骨折,要么是需要截骨和/或软骨切除(10 例),因此采用了混合手术。与匹配队列(HI ≤ 4)相比,HI 高的患者手术时间更长(171 分钟 vs 133 分钟;P < .001),更频繁地需要混合手术(16% vs 2%;P = .005),肋骨骨折(22% vs 3%;P = .001)和胸骨骨折(12% vs 0%;P = .003)的发生率更高,使用 3 根钢筋进行修复的比例更高(50% vs 19%;P < .001)。结论HI极高的患者可能是具有挑战性的病例,骨折和需要截骨/软骨切除的风险更大。尽管如此,如果由经验丰富的外科医生操作,微创修复技术仍可用于大多数病例,且不会增加并发症。
{"title":"Does a high Haller index influence outcomes in pectus excavatum repair?","authors":"Rawan M. Zeineddine MD,&nbsp;Michael Botros MD,&nbsp;Kenan A. Shawwaf MD,&nbsp;Ryan Moosavi MD,&nbsp;Mohamed R. Aly MD,&nbsp;Juan M. Farina MD,&nbsp;Jesse J. Lackey CSFA,&nbsp;Beth A. Sandstrom RN,&nbsp;Dawn E. Jaroszewski MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.04.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Severity for pectus excavatum includes Haller index (HI) &gt; 3.25. An extremely high HI (≥8) may influence surgical approach and complications. This study reviews outcomes of patients with high HI after repair.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single institution retrospective analysis was performed on adult patients with HI ≥ 8 undergoing pectus excavatum repairs. For outcomes, a propensity score-matched control group with a HI ≤ 4 was utilized.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span><span>In total, 64 cases (mean age, 33.5 ± 10.9 years; HI, 13.1 ± 5.0; 56% women) were included. A minimally invasive repair was successful in 84%. A hybrid procedure was performed in the remaining either to repair fractures of the ribs (8 patients) and sternum (5 patients) or when </span>osteotomy and/or cartilage resection was required (10 patients). In comparison with the matched cohort (HI ≤ 4), patients with high HI had longer operative times (171 vs 133 minutes; </span><em>P</em> &lt; .001), more frequently required hybrid procedures (16% vs 2%; <em>P</em> = .005), experienced higher incidences of rib (22% vs 3%; <em>P</em> = .001) and sternal fractures (12% vs 0%; <em>P</em> = .003), and had increased repair with 3 bars (50% vs 19%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). There were no significant differences between the groups for length of hospital stay or postoperative 30-day complications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with an extremely high HI can be challenging cases with greater risks of fracture and need for osteotomy/cartilage resection. Despite this, minimally invasive repair techniques can be utilized in most cases without increased complications when performed by an experienced surgeon.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"168 5","pages":"Pages 1395-1402"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140759005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Should mitral valve replacement age guidelines be lowered due to better bioprosthetic mitral valve durability? 由于生物瓣膜的耐用性更好,是否应该降低二尖瓣置换年龄指南?
IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.10.012
Matthew Romano MD , Patrick M. McCarthy MD , Abigail S. Baldridge MS , Jane Kruse BSN , Anna Huskin BSN , China Green MS , Jessica Woodford MPH , Heather Byrd MS , Steven F. Bolling MD

Objective

Guideline recommendations for mechanical or bioprosthetic valve for mitral valve replacement by age remains controversial. We sought to determine bovine pericardial valve durability by age and risk of reintervention.

Methods

This retrospective study between 2 large university-based cardiac surgery programs examined patients who underwent bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement from 2004 to 2020. Follow-up was obtained through June 2022. Durability outcomes involving structural valve deterioration were compared by age decile.

Results

Of 1544 available patients, mean age was 66 ± 13 years and 652 (42%) were aged less than 65 years. Indications for mitral valve replacement were as follows: mitral regurgitation greater than 2+ in 53% (n = 813), mitral stenosis in 44% (n = 650), endocarditis in 18% (n = 277), and reoperation in 39% (n = 602). Concomitant procedures were aortic valve replacement in 28% (n = 426), tricuspid valve in 36% (n = 550), and coronary artery bypass in 19% (n = 290). Thirty-day mortality was 5.4%. In follow-up (clinical: median [interquartile range] 75 [25-129] months), reoperation for endocarditis and new stroke were low (0.30 and 1.06 per 100 patient/years, respectively). The cumulative incidence of mitral valve reintervention for structural valve deterioration among all patients was 6.2% at 10 years and 9.0% at 12 years with no statistical difference in structural valve deterioration in patients aged 40 to 70 years (P = .1). In 90 patients with mitral valve reintervention, 30-day mortality after reintervention was 4.7% (n = 2) for 43 with mitral valve-in-valve and 6.4% (n = 3) for 47 with reoperation.

Conclusions

Bovine pericardial mitral valve replacement is a durable option for younger patients. The opportunity to avoid anticoagulation and the associated risks with mechanical mitral valve replacement may be of benefit to patients. These insights may provide data needed to revise the current guidelines.
目的:按年龄划分的MVR机械或生物瓣膜(BP)指南建议仍存在争议。我们试图通过年龄和再干预风险来确定牛心包膜瓣膜的耐久性。方法:这项针对两个大型大学心脏外科项目的回顾性研究对2004年至2020年接受BP MVR的患者进行了检查。随访至2022年6月。按年龄十分位数比较涉及结构瓣膜退化(SVD)的耐久性结果。结果:1544例患者平均年龄66±13岁,652例(42%)<65岁。MVR的适应症为:MR>2+53%[n=813];二尖瓣狭窄44%[n=650];心内膜炎18%[n=277],再次手术39%[n=602]。伴随手术为AVR 28%[n=426];三尖瓣36%[n=550];CAB 19%[n=290]。30天死亡率为5.4%。在随访(临床:中位数[IQR]75[25-129]个月)中,心内膜炎和新发卒中的再次手术率较低(分别为0.30和1.06/100患者/年)。在所有患者中,MV再干预SVD的累积发生率在10年时为6.2%,在12年时为9.0%,在40岁和70岁之间的患者中SVD没有统计学差异(p=0.1)。在90名MV再干预患者中,43名MViV患者再干预后30天的死亡率为4.7%(n=2),47名再次手术患者的死亡率为6.4%(n=3)。结论:牛心包MVR是年轻患者的一种持久选择。避免抗凝的机会和机械MVR的相关风险可能对患者有益。这些见解可能会提供修订现行指南所需的数据。
{"title":"Should mitral valve replacement age guidelines be lowered due to better bioprosthetic mitral valve durability?","authors":"Matthew Romano MD ,&nbsp;Patrick M. McCarthy MD ,&nbsp;Abigail S. Baldridge MS ,&nbsp;Jane Kruse BSN ,&nbsp;Anna Huskin BSN ,&nbsp;China Green MS ,&nbsp;Jessica Woodford MPH ,&nbsp;Heather Byrd MS ,&nbsp;Steven F. Bolling MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.10.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.10.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div><span>Guideline recommendations for mechanical or bioprosthetic valve for </span>mitral valve replacement by age remains controversial. We sought to determine bovine pericardial valve durability by age and risk of reintervention.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study between 2 large university-based cardiac surgery programs examined patients who underwent bioprosthetic mitral valve<span> replacement from 2004 to 2020. Follow-up was obtained through June 2022. Durability outcomes involving structural valve deterioration were compared by age decile.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span><span>Of 1544 available patients, mean age was 66 ± 13 years and 652 (42%) were aged less than 65 years. Indications for mitral valve replacement were as follows: mitral regurgitation<span> greater than 2+ in 53% (n = 813), mitral stenosis<span> in 44% (n = 650), endocarditis in 18% (n = 277), and </span></span></span>reoperation<span><span> in 39% (n = 602). Concomitant procedures were aortic valve replacement<span> in 28% (n = 426), tricuspid valve in 36% (n = 550), and </span></span>coronary artery bypass<span><span> in 19% (n = 290). Thirty-day mortality was 5.4%. In follow-up (clinical: median [interquartile range] 75 [25-129] months), reoperation for endocarditis and new stroke were low (0.30 and 1.06 per 100 patient/years, respectively). The cumulative incidence of mitral valve reintervention for </span>structural valve deterioration among all patients was 6.2% at 10 years and 9.0% at 12 years with no statistical difference in structural valve deterioration in patients aged 40 to 70 years (</span></span></span><em>P</em> = .1). In 90 patients with mitral valve reintervention, 30-day mortality after reintervention was 4.7% (n = 2) for 43 with mitral valve-in-valve and 6.4% (n = 3) for 47 with reoperation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Bovine pericardial mitral valve replacement is a durable option for younger patients. The opportunity to avoid anticoagulation and the associated risks with mechanical mitral valve replacement may be of benefit to patients. These insights may provide data needed to revise the current guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"168 5","pages":"Pages 1448-1458.e4"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41240373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Volume-failure-to-rescue relationship in acute type A aortic dissections: An analysis of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database 急性A型主动脉夹层体积衰竭与抢救的关系:胸外科医师学会数据库分析。
IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.08.037
Carlos E. Diaz-Castrillon MD , Derek Serna-Gallegos MD , George Arnaoutakis MD , Joshua Grimm MD , Wilson Y. Szeto MD , Danny Chu MD , Ahmet Sezer PhD , Ibrahim Sultan MD

Objective

To determine the relationship between volume of cases and failure-to-rescue (FTR) rate after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) across the United States.

Methods

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database was used to review outcomes of surgery after ATAAD between June 2017 and December 2021. Mixed-effect models and restricted cubic splines were used to determine the risk-adjusted relationships between ATAAD average volume and FTR rate. FTR calculation was based on deaths associated with the following complications: venous thromboembolism/deep venous thrombosis, stroke, renal failure, mechanical ventilation >48 hours, sepsis, gastrointestinal complications, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and unplanned reoperation.

Results

In total, 18,192 patients underwent surgery for ATAAD in 832 centers. The included hospitals' median volume was 2.2 cases/year (interquartile range [IQR], 0.9-5.8). Quartiles’ distribution was 615 centers in the first (1.3 cases/year, IQR, 0.4-2.9); 123 centers in the second (8 cases/year, IQR, 6.7-10.2); 66 centers in the third (15.6 cases/year, IQR, 14.2-18); and 28 centers in the fourth quartile (29.3 cases/year, IQR, 28.8-46.0). Fourth-quartile hospitals performed more extensive procedures. Overall complication, mortality, and FTR rates were 52.6%, 14.2%, and 21.7%, respectively. Risk-adjusted analysis demonstrated increased odds of FTR when the average volume was fewer than 10 cases per year.

Conclusions

Although high-volume centers performed more complex procedures than low-volume centers, their operative mortality was lower, perhaps reflecting their ability to rescue patients and mitigate complications. An average of fewer than 10 cases per year at an institution is associated with increased odds of failure to rescue patients after ATAAD repair.
目的:确定美国急性A型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)术后病例数与抢救失败率(FTR)之间的关系。混合效应模型和限制三次样条用于确定ATAAD平均体积和FTR率之间的风险调整关系。FTR的计算基于与以下并发症相关的死亡:静脉血栓栓塞/深静脉血栓形成、中风、肾衰竭、机械通气>48小时、败血症、胃肠道并发症、心肺复苏和计划外再次手术。结果:832个中心共有18192名患者接受了ATAAD手术。纳入医院的中位容量为2.2例/年(四分位间距[IQR],0.9-5.8)。第一个四分位的分布为615个中心(1.3例/年,IQR,0.4-2.9);第二组123个中心(8例/年,IQR,6.7-10.2);第三组66个中心(15.6例/年,IQR,14.2-18);第四分位数有28个中心(29.3例/年,IQR,28.8-46.0)。第四分位医院进行了更广泛的手术。总并发症、死亡率和FTR率分别为52.6%、14.2%和21.7%。风险调整分析表明,当平均每年病例数少于10例时,FTR的几率增加。结论:尽管高容量中心比低容量中心进行更复杂的手术,但它们的手术死亡率较低,这可能反映了它们抢救患者和减轻并发症的能力。一家机构平均每年少于10例病例与ATAAD修复后患者抢救失败的几率增加有关。
{"title":"Volume-failure-to-rescue relationship in acute type A aortic dissections: An analysis of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database","authors":"Carlos E. Diaz-Castrillon MD ,&nbsp;Derek Serna-Gallegos MD ,&nbsp;George Arnaoutakis MD ,&nbsp;Joshua Grimm MD ,&nbsp;Wilson Y. Szeto MD ,&nbsp;Danny Chu MD ,&nbsp;Ahmet Sezer PhD ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Sultan MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.08.037","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.08.037","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the relationship between volume of cases and failure-to-rescue (FTR) rate after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) across the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>The Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database was used to review outcomes of surgery after ATAAD between June 2017 and December 2021. Mixed-effect models and restricted cubic splines were used to determine the risk-adjusted relationships between ATAAD average volume and FTR rate. FTR calculation was based on deaths associated with the following complications: venous thromboembolism/deep venous thrombosis, stroke, renal failure, mechanical ventilation<span><span> &gt;48 hours, sepsis, </span>gastrointestinal complications, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and unplanned </span></span>reoperation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 18,192 patients underwent surgery for ATAAD in 832 centers. The included hospitals' median volume was 2.2 cases/year (interquartile range [IQR], 0.9-5.8). Quartiles’ distribution was 615 centers in the first (1.3 cases/year, IQR, 0.4-2.9); 123 centers in the second (8 cases/year, IQR, 6.7-10.2); 66 centers in the third (15.6 cases/year, IQR, 14.2-18); and 28 centers in the fourth quartile (29.3 cases/year, IQR, 28.8-46.0). Fourth-quartile hospitals performed more extensive procedures. Overall complication, mortality, and FTR rates were 52.6%, 14.2%, and 21.7%, respectively. Risk-adjusted analysis demonstrated increased odds of FTR when the average volume was fewer than 10 cases per year.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div><span>Although high-volume centers performed more complex procedures than low-volume centers, their operative mortality was lower, perhaps reflecting their ability to </span>rescue patients and mitigate complications. An average of fewer than 10 cases per year at an institution is associated with increased odds of failure to rescue patients after ATAAD repair.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"168 5","pages":"Pages 1416-1425.e7"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10140762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1