Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery最新文献

英文中文

Toward a chemotherapy-free future: Adjuvant alectinib in early-stage non–small cell lung cancer 迈向无化疗的未来：早期非小细胞肺癌的辅助治疗阿勒替尼。

IF 4.4 1区医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.07.023

Linda W. Martin MD, MPH, FACS

引用次数: 0

Commentary: Octogenarians and mitral valve surgery: Don't shed a TEER 评论：八十岁老人和MV手术：不要脱落TEER。

IF 4.4 1区医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.09.004

Adishesh K. Narahari MD, PhD, Irving L. Kron MD

引用次数: 0

Dual organs, singular challenge: Optimizing outcomes in Fontan transplantation 双器官，单一挑战：优化Fontan移植的结果。

IF 4.4 1区医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.08.018

Ashish H. Shah MD, MD-Research, FRCP

引用次数: 0

Single-surgeon versus 2-surgeon esophagectomy 单外科医生vs双外科医生食管切除术。

IF 4.4 1区医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.09.033

Aroub Alkaaki MD, Daniela Molena MD

引用次数: 0

The good, the bad, and the ugly: Which part for transapical mitral valve repair with neochord implantation? 好的，坏的，丑的：新脐带植入术的经尖顶二尖瓣修复的哪一部分？

IF 4.4 1区医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.06.016

Nicola Pradegan MD, Gino Gerosa MD

引用次数: 0

Commentary: More arteries, better outcomes: A Latin American perspective on multiarterial grafting in coronary artery bypass grafting 评论：更多的动脉，更好的结果：拉丁美洲在冠状动脉搭桥术中多动脉移植的观点。

IF 4.4 1区医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.07.021

Subodh Verma MD, PhD, FRCSC , Shubh K. Patel , Mario Gaudino MD, MS, PhD , John D. Puskas MD

引用次数: 0

Prediction of graft patency during the year following coronary artery bypass grafting: Preoperative computed tomography–derived fractional flow reserve versus intraoperative transit-time flow measurement 预测冠状动脉旁路移植术后一年的移植物通畅：术前计算机断层扫描衍生的血流储备分数与术中瞬时血流测量。

IF 4.4 1区医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.08.030

Min-Seok Kim MD, PhD, MSc , Ah-Jin Ryu PhD , Jung Won Kim MD , Cheol Ho Lee MD , Seong Wook Hwang MD , Ki-Bong Kim MD, PhD

Background

Preoperative cardiac computed tomography–derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and intraoperative transit-time flow measurement (TTFM) values were compared with graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods

One hundred and eight patients who underwent isolated CABG using an in situ internal thoracic artery (ITA)-based composite graft and whose CT-FFR values were obtained were included. TTFM values (mean graft flow [MGF; mL/min], pulsatility index [PI], and diastolic filling percentage [DF%]) were obtained for each anastomosis in all study patients. Early angiographies examined 342 anatomoses performed in all 108 patients, and 1-year angiographies examined 310 anastomoses performed in 97 patients (89.8%). Angiographic findings of graft flow were categorized as perfectly patent, bidirectionally competitive, unidirectionally competitive, and occluded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of CT-FFR and TTFM values for predicting angiographic findings was performed, and cutoff values and area under the ROC curve of CT-FFR and TTFM values were identified.

Results

The early angiograms identified 281 (82.2%) perfectly patent grafts, 33 (9.6%) bidirectionally competitive grafts, 27 (7.9%) unidirectionally competitive grafts, and 1 (0.3%) occluded graft. These numbers were 278 (89.7%), 13 (4.2%), 8 (2.6%), and 11 (3.5%), respectively, on the 1-year angiograms. CT-FFR values in coronary arteries with perfectly patent, bidirectionally competitive, and unidirectionally competitive grafts were significantly different during the year (0.640, 0.807, and 0.816, respectively, in early angiograms [P < .001] vs 0.658, 0.841, and 0.857, respectively, in 1-year angiograms [P < .001]). Cutoff values of CT-FFR, MGF, PI, and DF% predicting competitive graft flow were 0.774, 11 mL/minute, 2.8, and 72%, respectively, in early angiograms and 0.767, 12 mL/minute, 2.8, and 58.0%, respectively, in 1-year angiograms. CT-FFR values better predicted the early and 1-year competitive graft flow compared to TTFM values (MGF, P < .001; PI, P < .001; DF%, P < .001).

Conclusions

The diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR values for predicting competitive graft flow during the year following CABG using an in situ ITA-based composite graft was high and superior to TTFM values.

背景：将术前心脏计算机断层扫描得出的血流储备分数（CT-FFR）和术中瞬时血流测量值（TTFM）与冠状动脉旁路移植术（CABG）后的移植物通畅度进行比较。方法：采用原位胸内动脉（ITA）复合移植术行孤立性冠状动脉搭桥术的患者108例，均获得CT-FFR值。获得所有患者每个吻合口的TTFM值（平均移植物流量[MGF； mL/min]、脉搏指数[PI]和舒张充血率[DF%]）。在所有108例患者中，早期血管造影检查了342例解剖，1年血管造影检查了97例患者（89.8%）的310例吻合口。血管造影结果分为完全通畅、双向竞争、单向竞争和闭塞。对CT-FFR和TTFM值预测血管造影结果的受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线进行分析，确定CT-FFR和TTFM值的截止值和曲线下面积（AUC）。结果：早期完全通畅、双向竞争、单向竞争和闭塞分别为281例（82.2%）、33例（9.6%）、27例（7.9%）和1例（0.3%），1年血管造影分别为278例（89.7%）、13例（4.2%）、8例（2.6%）和11例（3.5%）。完全通畅、双向竞争和单向竞争冠状动脉的CT-FFR值在一年内有显著差异（早期分别为0.640、0.807和0.816）。结论：原位ita基复合冠状动脉冠脉置换术后一年内预测竞争移植物流量的CT-FFR值诊断准确性高且优于TTFM值。

{"title":"Prediction of graft patency during the year following coronary artery bypass grafting: Preoperative computed tomography–derived fractional flow reserve versus intraoperative transit-time flow measurement","authors":"Min-Seok Kim MD, PhD, MSc , Ah-Jin Ryu PhD , Jung Won Kim MD , Cheol Ho Lee MD , Seong Wook Hwang MD , Ki-Bong Kim MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.08.030","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.08.030","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Preoperative cardiac computed tomography–derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and intraoperative transit-time flow measurement (TTFM) values were compared with graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>One hundred and eight patients who underwent isolated CABG using an in situ internal thoracic artery (ITA)-based composite graft and whose CT-FFR values were obtained were included. TTFM values (mean graft flow [MGF; mL/min], pulsatility index [PI], and diastolic filling percentage [DF%]) were obtained for each anastomosis in all study patients. Early angiographies examined 342 anatomoses performed in all 108 patients, and 1-year angiographies examined 310 anastomoses performed in 97 patients (89.8%). Angiographic findings of graft flow were categorized as perfectly patent, bidirectionally competitive, unidirectionally competitive, and occluded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of CT-FFR and TTFM values for predicting angiographic findings was performed, and cutoff values and area under the ROC curve of CT-FFR and TTFM values were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The early angiograms identified 281 (82.2%) perfectly patent grafts, 33 (9.6%) bidirectionally competitive grafts, 27 (7.9%) unidirectionally competitive grafts, and 1 (0.3%) occluded graft. These numbers were 278 (89.7%), 13 (4.2%), 8 (2.6%), and 11 (3.5%), respectively, on the 1-year angiograms. CT-FFR values in coronary arteries with perfectly patent, bidirectionally competitive, and unidirectionally competitive grafts were significantly different during the year (0.640, 0.807, and 0.816, respectively, in early angiograms [<em>P</em> < .001] vs 0.658, 0.841, and 0.857, respectively, in 1-year angiograms [<em>P</em> < .001]). Cutoff values of CT-FFR, MGF, PI, and DF% predicting competitive graft flow were 0.774, 11 mL/minute, 2.8, and 72%, respectively, in early angiograms and 0.767, 12 mL/minute, 2.8, and 58.0%, respectively, in 1-year angiograms. CT-FFR values better predicted the early and 1-year competitive graft flow compared to TTFM values (MGF, <em>P</em> < .001; PI, <em>P</em> < .001; DF%, <em>P</em> < .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR values for predicting competitive graft flow during the year following CABG using an in situ ITA-based composite graft was high and superior to TTFM values.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"171 1","pages":"Pages 185-195.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144976798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Influence of the Composite allocation Score on racial/ethnic disparities in lung transplantation waitlist outcomes 肺移植等待名单结果的综合分配评分对种族差异的影响。

IF 4.4 1区医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.08.032

Shi Nan Feng BSPH , Alexandra A. Rizaldi BA , Danica Dong BS , Alice Zhou MS , Andrew Kalra BS , Jessica Ruck MD, PhD , Sean Agbor-Enoh MD, PhD , Errol Bush MD

Objectives

We examined the influence of the March 2023 Composite Allocation Score (CAS) policy change on lung transplantation (LT) versus waitlist death/deterioration by candidate race/ethnicity.

Methods

We identified LT candidates listed from 2020 to 2024 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Candidates were categorized by race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, or Asian). LT versus waitlist death/deterioration was compared across racial/ethnic groups for candidates listed pre-versus post-CAS. Multivariable competing risk regression, including an interaction term for CAS evaluated whether CAS modified the association between race/ethnicity and waitlist outcomes. Separate competing risk models assessed whether disparities persisted post-CAS.

Results

Of 12,478 candidates listed for LT (median age = 63 years; 59.3% men; 71.5% White, 10.3% Black, 14.3% Hispanic, and 3.9% Asian), 9058 candidates were listed pre-CAS and 3420 post-CAS. Post-CAS, the proportion of LT within 6 months increased significantly for Hispanic candidates (80.9% vs 66.8%; P < .001), whereas waitlist death/deterioration decreased for White (3.7% vs 5.8%; P < .001), Black (4.1% vs 7.5%; P = .042), and Hispanic (4.8% vs 8.8%; P < .001) candidates. Competing risk analyses revealed that pre-CAS, Black (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.95; P = .001), Hispanic (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.95; P = .001), and Asian (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95; P = .006) candidates had significantly lower likelihoods of LT compared with White candidates. Interaction term analysis revealed a greater post-CAS increase in LT likelihood for Hispanic compared with White candidates (interaction subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08-1.39; P = .002). Post-CAS, no significant disparities in waitlist outcomes remained between racial/ethnic groups.

Conclusions

CAS implementation was associated with improved LT access for Hispanic candidates. Race/ethnicity does not predict risk of LT or waitlist death/deterioration in the post-CAS era.

目的：我们研究了2023年3月综合分配评分（CAS）政策变化对肺移植（LT）与候选种族/民族等待名单死亡/恶化的影响。方法：我们从联合器官共享网络数据库中确定2020-2024年列出的LT候选人。候选人按种族/民族（白人、黑人、西班牙裔或亚洲人）分类。在不同种族/族裔的候选者中，对cas前和cas后的候选者进行了LT与等候名单死亡/恶化的比较。多变量竞争风险回归包括CAS的相互作用项，评估CAS是否修改了种族/民族与候补名单结果之间的关联。独立的竞争风险模型评估了cas后差异是否持续存在。结果：在12478名LT患者中（中位年龄为63岁，男性59.3%，白人71.5%，黑人10.3%，西班牙裔14.3%，亚裔3.9%），9058名患者为cas前患者，3420名患者为cas后患者。在CAS后，西班牙裔候选人6个月内的LT比例显著增加（80.9% vs. 66.8%）。结论：CAS的实施与西班牙裔候选人LT获取的改善有关。种族/民族不能预测后cas时代LT或候补死亡/恶化的风险。

{"title":"Influence of the Composite allocation Score on racial/ethnic disparities in lung transplantation waitlist outcomes","authors":"Shi Nan Feng BSPH , Alexandra A. Rizaldi BA , Danica Dong BS , Alice Zhou MS , Andrew Kalra BS , Jessica Ruck MD, PhD , Sean Agbor-Enoh MD, PhD , Errol Bush MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.08.032","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.08.032","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We examined the influence of the March 2023 Composite Allocation Score (CAS) policy change on lung transplantation (LT) versus waitlist death/deterioration by candidate race/ethnicity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We identified LT candidates listed from 2020 to 2024 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Candidates were categorized by race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, or Asian). LT versus waitlist death/deterioration was compared across racial/ethnic groups for candidates listed pre-versus post-CAS. Multivariable competing risk regression, including an interaction term for CAS evaluated whether CAS modified the association between race/ethnicity and waitlist outcomes. Separate competing risk models assessed whether disparities persisted post-CAS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 12,478 candidates listed for LT (median age = 63 years; 59.3% men; 71.5% White, 10.3% Black, 14.3% Hispanic, and 3.9% Asian), 9058 candidates were listed pre-CAS and 3420 post-CAS. Post-CAS, the proportion of LT within 6 months increased significantly for Hispanic candidates (80.9% vs 66.8%; <em>P</em> < .001), whereas waitlist death/deterioration decreased for White (3.7% vs 5.8%; <em>P</em> < .001), Black (4.1% vs 7.5%; <em>P</em> = .042), and Hispanic (4.8% vs 8.8%; <em>P</em> < .001) candidates. Competing risk analyses revealed that pre-CAS, Black (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.95; <em>P</em> = .001), Hispanic (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.95; <em>P</em> = .001), and Asian (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95; <em>P</em> = .006) candidates had significantly lower likelihoods of LT compared with White candidates. Interaction term analysis revealed a greater post-CAS increase in LT likelihood for Hispanic compared with White candidates (interaction subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08-1.39; <em>P</em> = .002). Post-CAS, no significant disparities in waitlist outcomes remained between racial/ethnic groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CAS implementation was associated with improved LT access for Hispanic candidates. Race/ethnicity does not predict risk of LT or waitlist death/deterioration in the post-CAS era.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"171 1","pages":"Pages 53-60.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144976832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Refining surgical decision-making for high-risk stage IA Non–Small cell lung cancer 改进高风险IA期非小细胞肺癌的手术决策。

IF 4.4 1区医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.09.009

Qiang Wu MD, Zhe Fan MD, Hao Su MD, Ting Lei MD

引用次数: 0

Adult Articles in AATS Journals 成人文章在AATS期刊

IF 4.4 1区医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(25)00997-3

引用次数: 0

首页上一页

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀