Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare最新文献

IntroductionThis study evaluates the short-term impact of two educational strategies on the appropriateness of electronic consultations (e-consults) submitted by primary care physicians (PCPs) to hepatologists for chronic liver disease (CLD) management. We compared a synchronous education program delivered in-person and online by hepatologists with an asynchronous approach based on e-consult feedback.MethodsWe conducted a 24-month prospective observational cohort study, analyzing e-consults related to the most prevalent CLD submitted by 326 PCPs to 10 hospital-based specialists in the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. E-consults were categorized into three consecutive 8-month periods based on PCPs' training exposure: Group I (no training), Group II (synchronous continuing medical education) and Group III (asynchronous education via e-consult feedback).ResultsA total of 9934 consecutive e-consults were analyzed, which 663 pertained to CLD cases, submitted by 205 (63%) of 326 eligible PCPs, involving 629 patients (median age: 55 years; 61.8% male). Overall, 68% of e-consults were deemed appropriate, with 58.2% resulting in a specialist care appointment. Appropriateness significantly improved following both synchronous and asynchronous training compared to the pre-training period (75.2% vs. 69.1% vs. 60.1%; p < 0.05). E-consults submitted by trained PCPs were significantly more likely to be appropriate (OR = 2.001; 95% CI: 1.360-2.946; p < 0.001).ConclusionBoth synchronous and asynchronous training significantly improved e-consult appropriateness and reduced unnecessary referrals. Asynchronous education via e-consult feedback emerged as a practical and effective alternative. These findings underscore the importance of educational programs in optimizing e-consult utilization, warranting further research on long-term impacts.

Endometriosis affects a significant portion of women during their reproductive years, causing substantial pain and impacting their quality of life. Telehealth services have emerged as a promising avenue for enhancing endometriosis care, especially in the post-COVID-19 era. For endometriosis patients, who often require frequent appointments and specialized care, telehealth offers a convenient and accessible solution, particularly for addressing pain management and interdisciplinary concerns. Despite the challenges posed by the lack of physical examinations in telehealth, studies show that it can be a viable option for endometriosis care. Integrating telehealth with in-person visits for initial assessments can build trust and ensure comprehensive care delivery. Moreover, telehealth facilitates collaboration among multidisciplinary teams, including gynecologists, psychologists, and physiotherapists, to provide holistic treatment plans addressing physical, psychological, and interpersonal aspects of endometriosis. Here, we explore the potential benefits of telehealth in managing endometriosis, highlighting its role in providing comprehensive, multidisciplinary care while overcoming barriers like diagnostic delays and limited access to specialists. Further research and integration of telehealth into routine practice are warranted to maximize its benefits and address the complex challenges associated with endometriosis management.

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic led to widespread adoption of telemedicine, which has persisted in healthcare delivery.ObjectiveWe aimed to characterize telemedicine use in ambulatory cardiology clinics over two years following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsRetrospective cross-sectional study from 16 March 2020 to 27 June 2022 in a single-center ambulatory cardiology clinic and telemedicine visits. Mixed effects logistic regression was used to model the association of diagnosis class (based on International Classification of Disease 10th Revision codes) with whether an encounter was scheduled as telemedicine, adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, date, and zip code. This was performed for telemedicine and in-office encounters across 15 University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Health System ambulatory cardiology clinics.ResultsThe analysis included 76,127 patients (49.60% women, age 61.5 ± 17.30 years, 57.27% white, 12.25% Hispanic, 81.79% with zip code in a UCLA Health service area) over 255,674 encounters. Each patient had a median of two encounters (range 1-81). Of all encounters, 29,154 (11.40%) were scheduled as telemedicine. Telemedicine was more likely used in the management of chronic conditions, especially metabolic disorders (adjusted OR [aOR] 2.36, 95% CI 2.19-2.54) and cardiomyopathies (aOR 2.16, 95% CI 1.99-2.34), than for evaluation of undifferentiated signs/symptoms. Telemedicine was less likely used for general exam/screening (aOR 0.49, 95% CI 0.44-0.56) and heart transplant (aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.40-0.64).ConclusionAmong the outpatient encounters in this study, the most established use case for telemedicine in cardiology was for care of chronic cardiovascular conditions among nontransplant patients, suggesting that future telemedicine expansion should be targeted toward the most appropriate clinical scenarios.

IntroductionIn obstetrics, telehealth is widely used in the provision of prenatal and postpartum care. The objective was to compare the utilization of commonly recommended services after delivery among individuals receiving telehealth versus in-person postpartum care.Study DesignWe performed a retrospective cohort study of individuals receiving postpartum care at a single institution between 1 July 2020 and 30 June 2023. The primary exposure was the exclusive use of telehealth versus an in-person visit for postpartum care. Two primary outcomes were assessed between 0 and 365 days after the delivery: 1) long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method use and 2) pap smear screening. Secondary outcomes occurring between 0 and 365 days after delivery included: clinic-based weight assessment, clinic-based blood pressure assessment, any prescription contraception use, primary care visit, and pregnancy within 1 year.ResultsAmong the 9953 individuals, 9058 (91.0%) had a postpartum visit. 1811 (19.9%) utilized telehealth exclusively, which peaked during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exclusive telehealth users were less likely to have a pap smear (21.6 vs. 40.1%, p < 0.001) or use LARCs (8.6 vs. 19.4%, p < 0.001) than those receiving in-person care. In the adjusted analysis, the odds ratio for receiving a pap smear was 0.38 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.47) and for using a LARC was 0.38 (95% CI 0.31-0.47) when comparing telehealth to in-person care. Reduced odds of all secondary outcomes were seen in the exclusive telehealth use compared to the in-person cohort, with the exception of subsequent pregnancy within 1 year, which was not significantly different.DiscussionAcknowledging that telehealth now has become an important means for patients to access medical care, these findings should prompt clinicians to consider when an in-person postpartum visit should be offered or recommended over telehealth, especially when a patient may not have a preference or reported barriers to accessing an in-person visit.

IntroductionThe rapid evolution and implementation of virtual care technologies for clinical use often exceeds the development of standardized implementation protocols, leading to gaps in the equitable and sustainable adoption of virtual care services, particularly in rural and remote areas. This paper introduces a comprehensive evaluation tool designed to assess community capacity and readiness for virtual care.MethodsThe development of the tool was informed by experiences from the Virtual Care and Robotics Program at the University of Saskatchewan. It involved a collaborative, multi-stakeholder approach that engaged healthcare leaders, IT experts and community healthcare workers. This iterative process included defining evaluation categories, mapping evaluative domains and refining the tool into a user-friendly checklist manual.ResultsThe tool identifies three key domains for assessing readiness: clinical needs, technology infrastructure and human resources/workflows. It was piloted in the remote community of Fond du Lac, Saskatchewan, where it successfully qualified the community for implementing telerobotic ultrasound services. The tool facilitated local engagement and highlighted the community's specific needs and readiness, enhancing the implementation process.ConclusionThis evaluation tool contributes to bridging the gap between the rapid deployment of virtual care technologies and the need for comprehensive, standardized implementation protocols. It offers a structured, practical approach to assessing and enhancing community readiness for virtual care while promoting successful clinical implementation and equitable access to healthcare.

IntroductionTelemedicine, propelled by recent technological advancements, has transformed healthcare delivery, notably benefiting patients with chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as systemic arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus. This meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials aimed to assess the efficacy of telehealth-based interventions on disease control rates and clinical parameters among NCD patients, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), fasting blood glucose (FBG), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels.MethodsWe conducted searches in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database for interventional studies that compared tele-monitoring with usual care in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed.ResultsOur meta-analysis included 75 studies, encompassing a total of 106,261 patients, with 50,074 (47.12%) receiving usual care and 56,187 (52.88%) receiving tele-monitoring care. The telemedicine group was associated with a statistically significant reduction in SBP (mean difference (MD) -4.927 mmHg; 95% CI -6.193 to -3.660; p < 0.001; I² = 90%), DBP (MD -2.019 mmHg; 95% CI -2.679 to -1.359; p < 0.001; I² = 54%), FBG (MD -0.405 mmol/L; 95% CI -0.597 to -0.213; p < 0.001; I² = 32%), and HbA1c (MD -0.418%; 95% CI -0.525 to -0.312; p < 0.001; I² = 76%).ConclusionsOur meta-analysis shows that telehealth technologies notably enhance blood pressure and blood glucose control. This supports integrating telemedicine into clinical protocols as a valuable complementary tool for managing hypertension and diabetes mellitus comprehensively.

IntroductionMeta-analysis shows that home tele-monitoring (HTM) improves glycaemic control in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) up to 12 months, but their health outcomes after HTM cessation remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the health outcomes of these patients 18 months after completing 6 months of HTM, compared to standard care.MethodsPatients with T2DM were enrolled in an open-labelled randomised controlled trial, aged 26 to 65 years, and suboptimal glycaemic control (HbA1c = 7.5%-10%). Patients in the intervention group (n = 165) undertook HTM using the OPTIMUM (Optimising care of Patients via Telemedicine In Monitoring and aUgmenting their control of diabetes Mellitus) HTM system for 6 months followed by usual care for another 18 months, while control group (n = 165) had usual care for 24 months. The OPTIMUM HTM system includes in-app video-based tele-education, tele-monitoring of the blood pressure (BP), capillary glucose and weight via Bluetooth devices and mobile applications, followed by algorithm-based telecare by the investigators. They were assessed using the Self-Care Inventory Scale (SCIR) and medication adherence (Medication Adherence Report Scale 5) at baseline, 6-month and 24-month time-points.ResultsThe data from 146 (intervention) and 152 (control) patients, with comparable baseline demographic profiles were eventually analysed. The decrease in HbA1c over 24 months was comparable between intervention and control group. Those in the intervention group were more likely to maintain their glycemic control (HbA1c ≤ 8%) (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.9, 95%confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-3.2; p = 0.028), had higher SCIR score (p = 0.004), and less likely to "never forget" (p = 0.022), or "stop medications" (p = 0.048), at 24-month time-point as compared to subjects in the control group.ConclusionThe glycaemic control of patients with T2DM continued to be maintained for another 18 months after 6 months of HTM, which were attributed to sustained self-care behaviour and medication adherence.

Telemedicine is comparable in quality to in-person care, adequate for many primary care concerns, acceptable to patients, and can overcome barriers to care. However, patients are reluctant to pay the same for telemedicine as in-person care and uncertainty about future payor reimbursement makes it risky to base a clinical practice primarily on telemedicine. Physical exam-supported information collection and relationship-building are limited in telemedicine, but can be mitigated through remote patient monitoring and ample access to a provider and clinical team. Subscription-based direct primary care models disconnect payment from episodes of care, which can support enhanced communication between the patient and care team and support time for asynchronous tasks such as remote patient monitoring data review. A "telemedicine first, direct primary care" model in which most care is provided through telemedicine and financed via subscription would retain the convenience of telemedicine, mitigate relationship-limiting deficiencies due to the lack of physical contact, and provide a stable revenue stream to support a telemedicine-based approach to care. Paired with specialist access via eConsults and options to refer to in-person care when necessary, this model would support telemedicine as the foundation for practice and connect underserved populations to primary and specialty care.

IntroductionTelehealth has been effectively used for managing chronic disease conditions; however, utilization patterns vary across populations. This study aims to examine the prevalence of telehealth utilization, the associated factors of telehealth modality (e.g., audio, video) among patients with chronic diseases, and the role of health literacy.MethodsParticipants with at least one diagnosed chronic disease from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 6) data (n=3686) were analyzed. Differences in participant characteristics between telehealth users and non-users were compared using χ² statistics. Multinomial logistic regression models were employed to investigate factors associated with telehealth modality.ResultsAbout 52% of participants reported using telehealth in the past 12 months, with 34.7% using audio-only modality. Telehealth use was highest among participants with depression (61.6%) and lowest among those with high blood pressure (47.6%). Participants over 75 years old (OR, 3.11 [95% CI, 1.99-4.85]; P < 0.001) were more likely to use audio-only modality compared to the youngest group (18-34 years). Respondents with a higher educational level (bachelor's degree: OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.59-1.00], P = 0.049; post-baccalaureate degree: OR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.43-0.82]; P < 0.001) and higher health literacy (OR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.66-0.99]; P =0.04) were more likely to use audio-video modality compared to their counterparts.DiscussionTelehealth use varied across demographics and chronic diseases, revealing significant disparities. Elderly individuals, those with lower socioeconomic status, and those with lower health literacy tended to use the audio-only modality. Providing support for digital platforms and health literacy can empower patients with chronic diseases to effectively use telehealth for self-management.

BackgroundInadequate counseling at patient discharge from the emergency department can lead to adverse patient outcomes. Virtual discharge counseling can address gaps in discharge counseling and improve patients' understanding of instructions.MethodsA previously established virtual discharge counseling program was scaled across three emergency departments and expanded to 13 diagnoses. Utilizing a standardized protocol and script, counselors performed virtual discharge counseling via a remote, secure teleconference platform in the patients' preferred language.ResultsVirtual discharge counseling was performed with 166 patients. COVID-19, back pain, and headache were the most frequent diagnoses. The median counseling time was 14 min. Median counseling time for English was 11 min, versus 20 min for other languages (p < 0.001). Counseling times were the longest for COVID-19 and diabetes (18 min for each).ConclusionWe demonstrate the scalability of a virtual discharge counseling program. Our findings can assist in targeting virtual discharge counseling resources for limited English-proficiency patients and specific diagnoses that require longer counseling times.