Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare最新文献

IntroductionLittle is known about which conditions seen in primary care are appropriate for video visits. This study evaluated video visits compared to office visits for six conditions: abdominal pain, joint pain, back pain, headache, chest pain, and dizziness.MethodsSix hundred charts of adult patients from our institution's same-day outpatient clinic were reviewed in this study. Charts for video visits evaluating the aforementioned chief complaints that occurred between August and October 2020 were reviewed and compared with charts for office visits that occurred from August to September 2019. Frequencies of 3-week follow-up visits, Emergency Room visits, imaging, and referrals for office and video visits were measured. Reasons for in-person evaluation for patients seen by video were determined by review of clinician notes.ResultsThree-week in-person follow-up was more frequent for patients presenting with chest pain (52% vs 18%, p = 0.0007) and joint pain (24% vs 8%, p = 0.05) after video evaluation, relative to an office evaluation. Three-week in-person follow-up was also more frequent for patients presenting with dizziness (38% vs 28%) and low back pain (24% vs 14%); however, this difference was not statistically significant. Patients presenting with headache and abdominal pain did not have a higher rate of follow-up.DiscussionBased on the frequency of in-person follow-up, this study suggests that video visits are generally adequate for evaluating headache and abdominal pain. Patients with dizziness and chest pain have the highest frequency of in-person and Emergency Room follow-up within 3 weeks when first seen by video compared to other conditions evaluated and may be less suitable for an initial video visit. Institutions can consider these findings when scheduling and providing guidance to patients on what type of visit is most appropriate for their symptoms.

Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is the most common demyelinating disease in children. Patients suffer from physical disability, cognitive impairment, and psychosocial challenges. Management requires a multidisciplinary care team. Here we present a case of an 11-year-old boy with POMS who relocated to Guam prior to initiation of a disease-modifying treatment and who experienced a flare without immediate access to an MRI or a child neurologist. Care required the combined efforts of ophthalmology, pediatrics, and emergency medicine in Guam, real-time remote guidance by child neurology, and asynchronous collaboration with cardiology and child neurology. As a result, the immediate flare was accurately diagnosed and treated with steroids, the patient was started on Fingolimod, and an emergency management plan for future flares was constructed. This case illustrates the nuances of both the acute and chronic management of multiple sclerosis in a resource-limited setting and how a combination of synchronous and asynchronous telemedicine was able to achieve a satisfactory treatment plan.

IntroductionAt a rate of more than 30% annually, neck pain is a very prevalent musculoskeletal ailment that is second only to low back pain as the most common cause of disability. Most occurrences of neck pain are nonspecific. Telerehabilitation is regarded as a potentially effective healthcare approach in this setting. This review aims to evaluate how a telerehabilitation-based intervention affected individuals with nonspecific neck pain (NNP) in terms of pain and disability.MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, and WanFang were consulted from inception to September 2023, with the inclusion of randomized controlled trials only. The experimental data were meta-analyzed using RevMan 5.3.ResultsThe meta-analysis contained eight studies; there was no significant difference in pain improvement in patients with NNP by telerehabilitation compared to conventional care (SMD = -0.10, 95% CI: -0.48 to 0.28), but there was a significant effect on disability improvement (SMD = -0.41, 95% CI: -0.78 to -0.03). Telerehabilitation demonstrated more significant improvements in pain (SMD = -1.16, 95% CI: -1.99 to -0.32) and disability (MD = -3.78, 95% CI: -5.29 to -2.27) compared to minimal or no intervention.DiscussionThis study emphasizes the potential benefits of employing telerehabilitation in patients with NNP, especially in reducing pain intensity and improving disability. But additional study is required to fully grasp the potential of telerehabilitation in this field.

BackgroundTelemedicine-specific clinical pathways (CPWs), coupled with electronic health record (EHR) order panels, provide an opportunity to ensure evidence and guideline concordant care for conditions at risk for inconsistent diagnoses and management strategies. Standardized provider and patient-facing illness scripts may fill gaps in clinicians' communication skills secondary to a training deficit in virtual care delivery. We aimed to implement and assess the impact of a novel care bundle for sinusitis on antimicrobial use, patient satisfaction, clinician satisfaction, and usability in patients with sinusitis.MethodsA sinusitis care bundle (SCB) for virtual urgent care patients included a sinusitis CPW with communication scripts, sinusitis order panels (SOP), and a patient education smart-phrase (SPESP) within visit instructions. Antimicrobial use was assessed during a 15-month period prior to the start of SCB element implementations and 14-months following, using statistical process control charts. Patient satisfaction was measured using Likert-style surveys. Clinician satisfaction was assessed using a novel survey addressing the SCB-targeted domains (decision support, communication, efficiency, usability, and overall satisfaction).ResultsThere were 69,785 and 64,019 evaluable patients in the pre-care and post-care bundle periods, respectively. Despite a significant increase in patients receiving a sinusitis diagnosis in the post-care bundle period (3.2% pre- vs. 6.2% post-, p < 0.001), antimicrobial prescribing decreased by 3.9% (p < 0.001), with statistical process control evidence of special cause change. There was a 5.1% decrease (p < 0.001) in negative patient survey responses after implementation. Clinician survey revealed substantial agreement in the domains relating to improving communication with patients and/or families, with the highest satisfaction for the SPESP over the SOP.ConclusionsImplementation of a telemedicine care bundle for patients diagnosed with sinusitis can balance multiple elements of quality care. The combination of a clinical care pathway, standardized language, and order panels within the EHR has the potential to improve patient satisfaction and decrease antimicrobial prescribing.

IntroductionTelehealth services have the potential to increase healthcare access among underserved populations, such as rural residents and racial/ethnic minority groups. The COVID-19 public health emergency led to unprecedented growth in telehealth utilization, but evidence suggests the growth has not been equitable across all patient populations. This study aimed to explore whether telehealth utilization and expansion changed equitably from 2019 to 2020 among sub-groups of Medicare beneficiaries.MethodsWe conducted an analysis of telehealth utilization among a 20% random sample of 2019-2020 Medicare beneficiaries on a national level. We fit multivariable logistic regression models and calculated average marginal effects (AME) to assess the association between demographic and clinical characteristics on telehealth utilization.ResultsWe found telehealth utilization was less likely among non-Hispanic Black/African-American (2019: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.77, AME = -0.15; 2020: aOR = 0.85, AME = -3.50) and Hispanic (2019: aOR = 0.79, AME = -0.13; 2020: aOR = 0.87, AME = -2.89) beneficiaries, relative to non-Hispanic White beneficiaries in both 2019 and 2020, with larger disparities in 2020. Rural beneficiaries were more likely to utilize telehealth than urban beneficiaries in 2019 (aOR = 2.62, AME = 0.84), but less likely in 2020 (aOR = 0.57, AME = -14.47). In both years, dually eligible Medicare/Medicaid beneficiaries were more likely than non-dually eligible beneficiaries to utilize telehealth (2019: aOR = 4.75, AME = 0.84; 2020: aOR = 1.34, AME = 2.25). However, the effects of dual eligibility and rurality changed in both models as the number of chronic conditions increased.DiscussionWe found evidence of increasing disparities in telehealth utilization among several Medicare beneficiary sub-groups in 2020 relative to 2019, including individuals of minority race/ethnicity, rural residents, and dually eligible beneficiaries, with disparities increasing among individuals with more chronic conditions. Although telehealth has the potential to address health inequities, our findings suggest that many of the patients in greatest need of healthcare are least likely to utilize telehealth services.

IntroductionThe rising number of outpatient spine surgeries creates challenges in postoperative management and care. Telemedicine offers a unique opportunity to reduce in-person clinic visits and improve resource allocation. We aimed to investigate the impact of a validated smartphone application on clinic utilization following full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS).MethodsWe evaluated patients undergoing FESS from 2020 to 2022 and a pre-COVID control group (CG) from 2018 to 2019. Subsequently, we divided the patients into three groups: one using the application (intervention group, IG), and two CGs (2020-2022, CG and 2018-2019, historical control group (HG)). We analyzed the post-surgical hospitalization rate, all follow-ups, and virtually transmitted patient-reported outcomes.ResultsA total of 115 patients were included in the IG. The CG consisted of 137 and the HG of 202 patients (CG and HG in the following). Group homogeneity was satisfactory regarding patient age (p = 0.9), sex (p = 0.88), and body mass index (p = 0.99). IG patients were treated as outpatients significantly more often [14.78% vs. 29.2% vs. 37.62% (p < 0.001)]. Additionally, IG patients showed significantly higher follow-up compliance [74.78% vs. 40.14% vs. 37.13% (p < 0.001)] 3-month post-surgery and fewer in-patient follow-up visits [(0.5 ± 0.85 vs. 1.32 ± 0.8 vs. 1.33 ± 0.7 (p < 0.001)].ConclusionOur results underline the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of remote patient monitoring following FESS. Furthermore, they highlight the opportunity to implement a virtual wound checkup, and to substantially improve postoperative follow-up compliance via telemedicine.

Palliative care management in rural and remote areas generally relies on local resources including a primary healthcare professional and a local health facility. Either in the absence of a primary healthcare professional, or in more complex cases, a patient is frequently transferred to a larger rural- or metropolitan-based health facility, away from community and local supports. With increasing challenges in locum availability, healthcare professionals are challenged in looking out for their own wellness needs, often having to choose between taking time-off or staying on duty and available to provide ongoing care for their patients. In this case report, we describe an alternative hybrid model of care which integrates place-based and virtual management, utilising digital health technologies. This approach supported a rural healthcare professional to take leave, by transferring the care and management of a palliative care patient to the WA Country Health Inpatient Telehealth Service, allowing the patient to remain in their local community and die in their place of choice. Access to palliative care is of great importance to quality care and its impacts cannot be overstated for the person with a terminal illness and their family, it is also important to take into consideration the role of the health professional and their well-being.

IntroductionAssisted teleconsultation (ATC) is the act of telemedicine involving on one side a patient in the presence of a healthcare professional, and an expert on the other side. ATC in outpatient pharmacies may be an alternative to the emergency room for patients with a semi-urgent medical problem. This project aimed at pilot testing the ATC in an outpatient pharmacy to assess its feasibility and to collect initial real-world data.MethodsAfter initial evaluation and triage by the pharmacist, ATC was proposed to patients consulting at one outpatient pharmacy for semi-urgent medical problems. Prospective data on patients, consultation reasons, teleconsultation duration, patient's orientation and pharmacist' satisfaction were prospectively collected.ResultsBetween December 2020 and June 2021, 39 consultations took place, 12 with video and 27 with telephone. Patients' median age was 37 years (IQR 26-50), 59% were women. Near half of the consultations (19) happened during the weekend. Mean ATC duration was 22 min (IC95% 18.6-26.1). Twenty-nine (74%) consultations ended with a prescription, 8 (21%) with medical recommendations and 2 (5%) with an emergency care referral. Without teleconsultation, 34 (87%) patients would have consulted a physician for their problem, and 24 (62%) would have been to the emergency room (self-reported). Fourteen (36%) consultations involved ENT, ophthalmologic and dermatologic complaints.ConclusionA young population with semi-urgent medical problems can be managed in the pharmacy using ATC with a primary care physician. Financial, technical and training aspects should be developed and optimized in the future.

BackgroundTelecare is increasingly important in managing patients with chronic diseases, including patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study evaluates the impact of telecare on patient retention and access to tertiary care for patients with IBD.MethodsWe analyzed patient data from a tertiary care IBD center, comparing patterns pre-COVID (January 2018 to March 2020) and post-COVID (August 2020 to January 2023) as only post-COVID patients had availability of telecare for return visits. Patients were classified based on their visit types and drive times to the clinic. Statistical analyses were conducted using Pearson Chi Square analysis for categorical variables as well as Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis statistical tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple tests.ResultsA total of 7040 patients were included. In the post-COVID period, 62% of return visit patients chose telecare, leading to increased retention rates (nonreturning patients decreased from 14% to 8%). Returning patient retention increased for 2 to 3 hours and more than 3 hours of drive time (+10% and +14%). Telecare return patients had significantly longer drive times (median 56.1 minutes) than nonreturn (median 45.7 minutes, p = 0.007) and in-person return prior to telecare availability (median 38.8, p < 0.001) patients. Patient satisfaction scores were high for both telecare and in-person visits. Telecare patients had lower rates of emergency department visits and hospital admissions.ConclusionTelecare significantly enhances patient retention and access to tertiary IBD care, particularly for patients living at greater distances. The study demonstrates that telecare is an effective strategy for maintaining multidisciplinary IBD care without compromising patient satisfaction or outcomes.

BackgroundPatients with supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma need to receive swallowing rehabilitation training. During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients do not have the conditions to visit the hospital for follow up frequently, so it is imperative to explore a new remote rehabilitation training model based on network conditions.ObjectiveTo explore the effect of remote rehabilitation training mode on improving postoperative swallowing function in patients with supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma.MethodsPatients undergoing remote rehabilitation and video rehabilitation after surgical treatment for supraglottic laryngeal cancer, 16 each, were collected, and swallowing function at the start of transoral feeding was assessed as a baseline to compare swallowing function and the occurrence of complications at different stages of training.ResultsPatients in the remote group began to show significant improvement in subjective swallowing function from the second week (P < .001). In terms of objective swallowing function, although the remote group did not show a significant (P = .66) advantage initially, it was also significantly better than the control group in the fourth week (P＜.001). These effects are even more impressive in patients undergoing open surgery (P＜.001). When completed the rehabilitation phase, patients in the remote group had a better nutritional status (P = .03), especially postlaser surgery patients (P = .02).ConclusionsThe remote rehabilitation training model has an improving effect on patients with supraglottic laryngeal cancer postoperative swallowing disorder, which provides a theoretical basis for the design and improvement of the future remote rehabilitation training model. This study suggests that this training model should be incorporated into the daily postoperative management of patients with laryngeal cancer to improve the efficiency of patients' recovery, provide patients with real-time medical information, and relieve patients' anxiety, thus reducing the need for repeated visits and improving patients' postoperative quality of life.