Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare最新文献

Introduction: Videoconferencing psychotherapy (VCP) delivers treatment to individuals with limited access to face-to-face mental healthcare. VCP's effectiveness has been demonstrated for various disorders and therapeutic interventions. However, there is contradictory evidence regarding the therapeutic alliance in VCP as compared to psychotherapy in person (PIP). This meta-analysis examines whether therapeutic alliance differs by psychotherapy's delivery format, namely VCP versus PIP.

Methods: We searched five databases for trials comparing the therapeutic alliance in VCP and PIP, wherein the therapeutic alliance was rated by either patients or therapists or both. Eighteen publications were included, and the difference between VCP and PIP was assessed. Furthermore, we tested possible moderators of the difference in therapeutic alliance between VCP and PIP by meta-regression, and we assessed the risk of bias of this meta-analysis.

Results: The meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the therapeutic alliance between VCP and PIP for alliance ratings by patients (SMD = -0.09; 95% CI = -0.26; 0.07) as well as by therapists (SMD = 0.04; 95% CI = -0.17; 0.25). No significant moderators were found.

Discussion: In this meta-analysis, VCP and PIP did not differ with respect to the therapeutic alliance as rated by either patients or therapists. Further research is required into mechanisms driving the therapeutic alliance in VCP and PIP.

Introduction: Using a human factors engineering approach, the Johns Hopkins Personalized Pain Program adopted telemedicine for perioperative pain management in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines the impact of telemedicine adoption on the quality and outcomes of perioperative pain management.

Methods: A mixed-methods study with a convergent parallel design was conducted. From June 2017 to December 2021, 902 patients participated in the Personalized Pain Program. Quantitative data on daily opioid consumption, pain severity and interference, physical and mental health status, and patient satisfaction and engagement were continuously collected with all patients using chart review and patient surveys. Beginning 23 March 2020, the Personalized Pain Program transitioned to telemedicine. A pre-post quasi-experimental design was used to examine the impact of telemedicine. In addition, qualitative interviews were conducted with 3 clinicians and 17 patients to explore their experience with telemedicine visits.

Results: The monthly number of new patients seen in the Personalized Pain Program did not significantly change before and after telemedicine adoption. Compared to patients having in-person visits before the pandemic, patients having telemedicine visits during the pandemic achieved comparable improvements in daily opioid consumption, pain severity and interference, and physical health status. While telemedicine helped overcome many challenges faced by the patients, the limitations of telemedicine were also discussed.

Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic stimulated the use of telemedicine. To facilitate telemedicine adoption beyond the pandemic, future research is needed to examine best practices for telemedicine adoption and provide additional evidence on the effectiveness of telemedicine.

Introduction: Teleneurocritical care (TNCC) provides virtual care for hospitals who do not have continuous neurointensivist coverage. It is not known if TNCC is cost effective nor which variables impact the total billed charges per patient encounter. We characterize cost, defined by charge characteristics of TNCC compared to in-person neurocritical care (NCC), for patients with acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke requiring ICU care.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review from 2018 to 2021 of prospectively collected multinstitutional databases from a large, integrated, not-for-profit health system with an in-person NCC and spoke TNCC sites. The primary outcome was the total billable charge per TNCC patient with acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke compared to in-person NCC. Secondary outcomes were functional outcome, transfer rate, and length of stay (LOS).

Results: A total of 1779 patients met inclusion criteria, 1062 at the hub in-person NCC hospital and 717 at spoke TNCC hospitals. Total billed patient charges of TNCC were similar to in-person NCC (median 104% of the cost per in-person NCC patient, 95% CI: 99%-108%). From 2018 to 2021, the charge difference between TNCC and NCC was not different (r²  =  0.71, p  =  0.16). Both age and length stay were independently predictive of charges: for every year older the charge increased by US $6.3, and every day greater LOS the charge increased by $2084.3 (p < 0.001, both). TNCC transfer rates were low, and TNCC had shorter LOS and greater favorable functional outcome.

Discussion: TNCC was associated with similar patient financial charges as compared to in-person NCC. Standardization of care and the integrated hub-spoke value-focused operational procedures of TNCC may be applicable to other healthcare systems, however, further prospective study is needed.

Introduction: Many patients used telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, we evaluate how different factors have affected telehealth utilization in recent years. Decision makers at the federal and state levels can use the results of this study to inform their healthcare-related policy decisions.

Methods: We implemented data analytics techniques to determine the factors that explain the use of telehealth by developing a case study using data from Arkansas. Specifically, we built a random forest regression model which helps us identify the important factors in telehealth utilization. We evaluated how each factor impacts the number of telehealth patients in Arkansas counties.

Results: Of the 11 factors evaluated, five are demographic, and six are socioeconomic factors. Socioeconomic factors are relatively easier to influence in the short term. Based on our results, broadband subscription is the most important socioeconomic factor and population density is the most important demographic factor. These two factors were followed by education level, computer use, and disability in terms of their importance as it relates to telehealth use.

Discussion: Based on studies in the literature, telehealth has the potential to improve healthcare services by improving doctor utilization, reducing direct and indirect waiting times, and reducing costs. Thus, federal and state decision makers can influence the utilization of telehealth in specific locations by focusing on important factors. For example, investments can be made to increase broadband subscriptions, education levels, and computer use in targeted locations.

Introduction: Telehealth has been effectively used for managing chronic disease conditions; however, utilization patterns vary across populations. This study aims to examine the prevalence of telehealth utilization, the associated factors of telehealth modality (e.g., audio, video) among patients with chronic diseases, and the role of health literacy.

Methods: Participants with at least one diagnosed chronic disease from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 6) data (n=3686) were analyzed. Differences in participant characteristics between telehealth users and non-users were compared using χ² statistics. Multinomial logistic regression models were employed to investigate factors associated with telehealth modality.

Results: About 52% of participants reported using telehealth in the past 12 months, with 34.7% using audio-only modality. Telehealth use was highest among participants with depression (61.6%) and lowest among those with high blood pressure (47.6%). Participants over 75 years old (OR, 3.11 [95% CI, 1.99-4.85]; P < 0.001) were more likely to use audio-only modality compared to the youngest group (18-34 years). Respondents with a higher educational level (bachelor's degree: OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.59-1.00], P = 0.049; post-baccalaureate degree: OR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.43-0.82]; P < 0.001) and higher health literacy (OR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.66-0.99]; P =0.04) were more likely to use audio-video modality compared to their counterparts.

Discussion: Telehealth use varied across demographics and chronic diseases, revealing significant disparities. Elderly individuals, those with lower socioeconomic status, and those with lower health literacy tended to use the audio-only modality. Providing support for digital platforms and health literacy can empower patients with chronic diseases to effectively use telehealth for self-management.

Introduction: Telehealth is a growing part of the healthcare field, and healthcare professionals and trainees require training not only on the clinical skills relevant to telehealth but also on professionalism skills or telehealth etiquette. As healthcare outcomes are influenced by the patient-provider relationship, training healthcare professionals on telehealth etiquette skills is imperative.

Methods: Forty-eight healthcare professionals across different disciplines, work settings, and experience levels participated in a telehealth etiquette skills educational intervention workshop wherein their knowledge and readiness to use the skills (specific to technology, environment, confidentiality, and communication) were assessed before and after the workshop.

Results: Paired sample t-tests revealed that participating in the educational intervention resulted in statistically significant improvements in knowledge and perceived readiness to use telehealth etiquette skills pertinent to technology, environment, and communication. There were no associations between participants' personal factors and post-educational intervention changes.

Discussion: Study findings are significant and suggest that training healthcare professionals in telehealth etiquette have a positive impact. Since there is a known positive association between provider communication and patient satisfaction and a known association between patient satisfaction and healthcare outcomes, gaining telehealth etiquette skills is critical for promoting a positive patient-provider relationship via telehealth.

Endometriosis affects a significant portion of women during their reproductive years, causing substantial pain and impacting their quality of life. Telehealth services have emerged as a promising avenue for enhancing endometriosis care, especially in the post-COVID-19 era. For endometriosis patients, who often require frequent appointments and specialized care, telehealth offers a convenient and accessible solution, particularly for addressing pain management and interdisciplinary concerns. Despite the challenges posed by the lack of physical examinations in telehealth, studies show that it can be a viable option for endometriosis care. Integrating telehealth with in-person visits for initial assessments can build trust and ensure comprehensive care delivery. Moreover, telehealth facilitates collaboration among multidisciplinary teams, including gynecologists, psychologists, and physiotherapists, to provide holistic treatment plans addressing physical, psychological, and interpersonal aspects of endometriosis. Here, we explore the potential benefits of telehealth in managing endometriosis, highlighting its role in providing comprehensive, multidisciplinary care while overcoming barriers like diagnostic delays and limited access to specialists. Further research and integration of telehealth into routine practice are warranted to maximize its benefits and address the complex challenges associated with endometriosis management.

Introduction: Meta-analysis shows that home tele-monitoring (HTM) improves glycaemic control in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) up to 12 months, but their health outcomes after HTM cessation remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the health outcomes of these patients 18 months after completing 6 months of HTM, compared to standard care.

Methods: Patients with T2DM were enrolled in an open-labelled randomised controlled trial, aged 26 to 65 years, and suboptimal glycaemic control (HbA1c = 7.5%-10%). Patients in the intervention group (n = 165) undertook HTM using the OPTIMUM (Optimising care of Patients via Telemedicine In Monitoring and aUgmenting their control of diabetes Mellitus) HTM system for 6 months followed by usual care for another 18 months, while control group (n = 165) had usual care for 24 months. The OPTIMUM HTM system includes in-app video-based tele-education, tele-monitoring of the blood pressure (BP), capillary glucose and weight via Bluetooth devices and mobile applications, followed by algorithm-based telecare by the investigators. They were assessed using the Self-Care Inventory Scale (SCIR) and medication adherence (Medication Adherence Report Scale 5) at baseline, 6-month and 24-month time-points.

Results: The data from 146 (intervention) and 152 (control) patients, with comparable baseline demographic profiles were eventually analysed. The decrease in HbA1c over 24 months was comparable between intervention and control group. Those in the intervention group were more likely to maintain their glycemic control (HbA1c ≤ 8%) (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.9, 95%confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-3.2; p = 0.028), had higher SCIR score (p = 0.004), and less likely to "never forget" (p = 0.022), or "stop medications" (p = 0.048), at 24-month time-point as compared to subjects in the control group.

Conclusion: The glycaemic control of patients with T2DM continued to be maintained for another 18 months after 6 months of HTM, which were attributed to sustained self-care behaviour and medication adherence.

Background: There is an increasing demand for the provision of speech language pathology (SLP) services via telehealth. Therefore, we systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials comparing telehealth to face-to-face provision of SLP services.

Methods: We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane, clinical trial registries, and conducted a citation analysis to identify trials. We included randomized trials comparing similar care delivered live via telehealth (phone or video), to face-to-face. Primary outcomes included: % syllables stuttered (%SS) (for individuals who stutter); change in sound pressure levels monologue (for individuals with Parkinson's disease); and key function scores (for other areas). Where data were sufficient, mean differences were calculated.

Results: Nine randomized controlled trials were included; eight evaluated video and one evaluated phone telehealth. Risk of bias was generally low or unclear, excepting blinding. There were no significant differences at any time-point up to 18 months for %SS (mean difference, MD 0.1, 95% CI -0.4 to 0.6, p = 0.70). For people with Parkinson's disease, there was no difference between groups in change in sound pressure levels (monologue) (MD 0.6, 95% CI -1.2 to 2.5, p = 0.49). Four trials investigated interventions for speech sound disorder, voice disorder and post-stroke dysphagia and aphasia; they found no differences between telehealth service delivery and face-to-face delivery.

Conclusions: Evidence suggests that the telehealth provision of SLP services may be a viable alternative to their provision face-to-face, particularly to people who stutter and people with Parkinson's disease. The key limitation is the small number of randomized controlled trials, as well as evidence on the quality of life, well-being and satisfaction and economic outcomes.

Introduction: Ukraine's health and trauma system has been detrimentally impacted since the start of the Russian invasion in February 2022. Use of telemedicine became critical to providing timely medical care. As such, the aim of this study was to describe telemedicine's use in the health and trauma system of Ukraine following the full-scale invasion.

Methods: We conducted qualitative key informant interviews with military and civilian health care workers using an expanded version of the Global Trauma System Evaluation Tool which had components focusing on telemedicine use. Thematic content analysis was used to derive key telemedicine themes from interviews.

Results: We conducted 36 key informant interviews. Most respondents described using telemedicine through informal means of communication such as messaging apps to meet patient care needs. Concerns and challenges with use of telemedicine included weapons targeting, internet connections and safety of communications from Russian hackers. A unified system for telemedicine would greatly improve use in country both during and post conflict.

Discussion: Telemedicine use has rapidly increased in Ukraine during the current conflict particularly in the scope of providing trauma care when numerous specialties are needed. Development of a unified, secure telemedicine system with mechanisms for integrating multinational medical support would aid in providing swift medical care to persons injured in the conflict or unable to access a specialty provider in their proximity.