Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare最新文献

Objectives: Tele-orthodontics is an important medium to use for diagnosis and treatment planning and to refer patients for specific treatment when deemed necessary. The effectiveness of the Tele-orthodontics Education Model serves to improve resident's knowledge, confidence, and skills in delivering tele-orthodontic patient care. The purpose of this educational single-arm pre-test-post-test interventional study was to assess and educate orthodontic residents (6 year-one, and 6 year-two) to appropriately use tele-orthodontics.

Methods: The Tele-orthodontics Education Model utilizes three learning modules, a questionnaire before and after the training to assess participant knowledge, confidence and skills levels, three online multiple-choice questionnaires, three explanatory videos and an in-person simulation session. The Blackboard Learning Management System (virtual learning platform) facilitates access to the various modules of the program. Within each learning module, a participant's knowledge level was determined by utilizing five multiple-choice questions before and after each module. The various modules were introduced to the participants and then evaluated by reviewing the participant's responses to the multiple-choice questions.

Results: Twelve orthodontic residents completed the model in one session. Everyone fully completed the questionnaire. Post-test results showed higher mean scores for all questions addresses knowledge, the mean confidence, and skills score for post-test showed no change when compared to pre-test.

Conclusions: This education model was effective in improving basic knowledge in tele-orthodontics among first, and second-year orthodontic residents. We hypothesize that the residents are more informed and prepared for future tele-orthodontic practices.

Background: Measures used to prevent adverse events during the implementation of exercise sessions delivered via telerehabilitation can be varied, ranging from simple telephone monitoring to synchronous therapist-led sessions. However, this information is scattered in the literature, as evidence synthesis studies have only addressed the safety, satisfaction, and effectiveness aspects of exercise delivered via telerehabilitation.

Aims: This scoping review aims to describe that measures are used to ensure safety during exercise sessions delivered to people with stroke through telerehabilitation, as reported by authors of primary studies. Secondarily, it describes the designs most frequently used to notify the effects of telerehabilitation and evidence level, the characteristics of the participants and type of stroke, and the characteristics of telerehabilitation.

Summary of review: A scoping review was conducted according to the Joana Briggs Institute (JBI) recommendations. A systematic search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CENTRAL, and CINHAL was conducted from inception to August 2022, and a review of systematic review references on the topic. We included primary studies that enrolled adults with stroke who underwent exercise delivered via telerehabilitation. Two independent reviewers performed study selection and data extraction, and disagreements were resolved by consensus or a third reviewer. A qualitative analysis of the information was performed. One hundred seven primary studies (3991 participants) published between 2002 and 2022 were included. Most studies were case series (43%) and rated with an Oxford level of evidence of "4" (55.3%). Regarding randomized clinical trials, half included 53 or more participants (IQR 26.75 to 81). Most studies applied the exercises via asynchronous telerehabilitation (55.1%), of which only ten reported measures to avoid adverse events. Some of the measures included assessing the location where exercises are to be performed, only using a seated position, and using live warning systems that prevent or stop exercises when they are risky.

Conclusions: Reporting of measures implemented to prevent adverse events during exercise delivery via asynchronous telerehabilitation is scarce. Future primary studies should always consider reporting adverse events related to exercise delivery via telerehabilitation and strategies implemented to decrease the incidence of these unwanted safety events.

Registration number: INPLASY202290104.

Introduction: Given that chronic, long-term conditions are increasingly common in older patients, the impact of telesurveillance program on clinical outcomes is uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a 12-month remote monitoring program in preventing rehospitalizations in older patients with two or more chronic diseases returning home after hospitalization.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial in two parallel groups to evaluate the remote monitoring system. Elderly patients with chronic diseases (at least two comorbidities) aged 65 years or older and discharged home after acute hospital care for a chronic disease were randomized to receive a home telemonitoring program (intervention group, n = 267) or conventional care (control group, n = 267). The remote home monitoring program was an online biometric home life analysis technology (e-COBAHLT) with tele-homecare/automation and biometric sensors. The eCOBALTH intervention group received the automation sensors containing chronic disease clinical factor trackers to monitor their biometric parameters and detect any abnormal prodromal disease decompensation by remote monitoring and providing geriatric expertise to general practitioners. The usual care group received no eCOBALTH program. In both groups, baseline visits were conducted at baseline and the final visit at 12 months. The primary outcome was the incidence of unplanned hospitalizations for decompensation during the 12-month period.

Results: Among 534 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 80.3 [8.1] years; 280 [52.4%] women), 492 (92.1%) completed the 12-month follow-up; 182 (34.1) had chronic heart failure, 115 (21.5%) had stroke, and 77 (14.4%) had diabetes. During the 12-month follow-up period, 238 patients had at least one unplanned hospitalization for decompensation of a chronic disease: 108 (40.4%) in the intervention group versus 130 (48.7%) in the control group (P = 0.04). The risk of rehospitalization was significantly reduced in the intervention group (age- and sex-adjusted relative risk: 0.72, 95% 95% confidence intervals 0.51-0.94).

Conclusion: A 12-month home telemonitoring program with online biometric analysis using Home life technology combining telecare and biometric sensors is feasible and effective in preventing unplanned hospitalizations for chronic disease decompensation in elderly patients with chronic diseases at high risk for hospitalizations.

Introduction: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of telerehabilitation for patients after hip fracture surgery through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: Eight electronic databases were searched in August 2022. The primary outcomes were mobility outcomes, activities of daily living (ADL) outcomes, and all adverse events, whereas the secondary outcomes were pain, health-related quality of life, and fall efficacy scale score.

Results: Seven randomized controlled trials were eligible for this study. The evidence regarding the effect of telerehabilitation on mobility outcomes (standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.39 to 0.48) and all adverse events (risk ratio: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.62 to 2.21) was very uncertain. A clinically irrelevant but significant mean difference (MD) in ADL outcomes was found (MD: 4.82, 95% CI: 2.63 to 7.01). Telerehabilitation may result in a slight increase in fall efficacy scale score (SMD: 0.26, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.54) and little to no difference in pain (MD: -1.0, 95% CI: -18.31 to 16.31).

Conclusions: The efficacy of telerehabilitation for patients after hip fracture surgery was uncertain with respect to the mobility outcomes, all adverse events, and pain, with no clinically meaningful differences in ADL outcomes. Telerehabilitation may be necessary to be considered for patients after hip fracture surgery to improve their confidence in their ability to perform daily activities without falling. Therefore, medical staff may consider telerehabilitation for hip fractures.

Despite evidence to the contrary, U.S. policy makers, payers, and the public continue to express apprehension that the use of telehealth is associated with increased risk of fraud and abuse. The fraudulent use of telehealth is multifaceted and complex, ranging from potentially false claims to miscoding, inaccurate billing, and kickbacks. For the past 6 years, the U.S. Federal Government has undertaken research studies to examine potential fraud issues related to the use of telehealth, including up-coding time spent with the patient, misrepresentation of the service provided, and billing for services that were not rendered. This article reviews previous efforts to assess the risk of fraud associated with the delivery of virtual care in America, concluding that there is little evidence for higher levels of fraud and abuse related to the use of telehealth.

Introduction: Patients with systemic lupus erythematous were vulnerable to severe coronavirus disease 2019 infection and the negative impact of disrupted healthcare delivery. Telemedicine has been a popular alternative to standard in-person care during the pandemic despite the lack of evidence.

Methods: This was a 1-year pragmatic randomized-controlled trial. Patients followed at the lupus nephritis clinic were randomized to either telemedicine or standard follow-up in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the telemedicine group were followed up via videoconferencing. Standard follow-up group patients continued conventional in-person outpatient care. The primary outcome of the study was the proportion of patients in low disease activity after 1 year. Secondary outcomes included cost-of-illness, safety, and various patient-reported outcomes.

Results: From 6/2020 to 12/2021, 144 patients were randomized and 141 patients (telemedicine: 70, standard follow-up: 71) completed the study. At 1 year, 80.0% and 80.2% of the patients in the telemedicine group and standard follow-up group were in lupus low disease activity state or complete remission, respectively (p = 0.967). Systemic lupus erythematous disease activity indices, number of flares and frequency of follow-ups were also similar. There were no differences in the cost-of-illness, quality of life or mental health scores. However, significantly more patients in the telemedicine group (41.4% vs 5.6%; p < 0.001) required switch of mode of follow-up and higher proportion of them had hospitalization during the study period (32.9% vs 15.5%; p = 0.016). Being in the telemedicine group or not in low disease activity at baseline were the independent predictors of hospitalization (odds ratio: 2.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.1-6.1, odds ratio: 2.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-6.7, respectively) in the post hoc analysis.

Conclusions: In patients with systemic lupus erythematous, telemedicine predominant follow-up resulted in similar 1-year disease control compared to standard care. However, it needed to be complemented by in-person visits, especially in patients with unstable disease.

Introduction: Teledentistry is an innovative health care delivery platform that can potentially improve oral health access and outcomes. The purpose of this study was to predict teledentistry utilization intentions of U.S. adults using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) as a framework.

Methods: This mixed-method, cross-sectional study surveyed 899 participants from two independent samples in August and September 2021. Convenience samples of Minnesota State Fair attendees and ResearchMatch volunteers completed electronic surveys to identify the behavioral intention (BI) for teledentistry use within the next 6 months. Independent variables were the UTAUT constructs of performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), social influence (SI), and facilitating conditions (FC). Data were analyzed using univariate analysis and multiple linear regression adjusting for age, gender and educational level. Qualitative analysis used thematic analysis using UTAUT as a coding framework.

Results: Univariate analysis showed statistical significance between each construct with BI (P < 0.0001). Adjusted multiple linear regression revealed statistical significance between PE and SI with BI (P < 0.0001). Qualitative responses corroborated quantitative results and revealed a lack of teledentistry knowledge.

Conclusion: The majority of participants indicated an intention not to use teledentistry within the next 6 months. The lack of prior experience of telehealth or teledentistry use in addition to lack of knowledge regarding teledentistry may contribute to these results. Future interventions to improve the BI to use teledentistry may benefit from focusing on PE and SI constructs for educational and marketing strategies.

In this case report, we describe the performance of procedural sedation and emergent joint reduction via remote telehealth leadership for a patient with an acutely limb-threatening injury. The patient was a 33-year-old man who presented to a small rural hospital with a fracture dislocation of his ankle complicated by severe pain refractory to opiate analgesia and neurovascular compromise, including absent peripheral pulses and sensory changes. Due to aviation and resource limitation factors, immediate retrieval was not possible. While it was clear he needed urgent treatment, local staff expressed that they did not possess the training or requisite experience to undertake a procedural sedation and joint reduction. Following extensive discussions between the telehealth specialist and the local team, the telehealth doctor assumed clinical governance for the case, serving as team leader and coaching the local team through a ketamine procedural sedation and emergent joint reduction. Ultimately, these procedures were successful, with immediate improvement in limb neurovascular status. This case, along with prior work, demonstrates that High-Acuity Low-Occurrence (HALO) procedures can be facilitated by telehealth. Key learning points from the case include the choice of anaesthetic agent given limited local experience, delegating a separate telehealth clinician to monitor patient vital signs to cognitively offload local staff, and the importance of detailed pre-procedure discussions prior to completing HALO tasks.

Introduction: Mental health issues disproportionately affect rural and low-income populations, where access to prevention and treatment is limited. Implementing telemental health services (TMHS) in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) could improve accessibility to mental healthcare. This study assessed the effect of TMHS on mental health services utilization in FQHCs, comparing centers with and without TMHS and examined differences in TMHS effect between FQHCs that adopted TMHS before and during the pandemic.

Methods: The study utilized FQHC-level data from Uniform Data Systems annual performance reports (N = 9540 FQHC-year) and county-level demographic, health status, and provider characteristic data from 2016 to 2022. A two-way fixed effects model was applied to examine the effect of TMHS on mental health visit rates, supplemented by the Sun and Abraham difference-in-differences estimator. The analysis included both pre-COVID and during-COVID TMHS adopters.

Results: FQHCs offering TMHS showed 1.04 times increase in overall mental health visit rates compared to those without TMHS. Centers serving higher proportions of Medicaid-insured (1.07 times) and low-income (below 200% FPL; 1.05 times) populations showed even higher visit rates. During-COVID TMHS adopters showed a significant increase (1.05 times), particularly in urban areas, whereas rural adopters did not see significant changes.

Conclusion: FQHCs offering TMHS showed increased mental health visit rates, especially among low-income and Medicaid-insured populations. FQHCs that adopted TMHS during the pandemic experienced a marked rise in mental health visits, but rural-urban disparities persist, highlighting the ongoing challenges in expanding access to mental healthcare in rural settings.

Introduction: Optimal hospital bed utilization requires innovative patient care models. We studied a novel hospitalist model utilizing telemedicine to facilitate collaboration with affiliated emergency departments (EDs) and support medical triage and care of ED patients with high likelihood of hospital admission.

Methods: Telehospitalists based at a tertiary care facility collaborated with four community EDs in the same healthcare network between January 1, 2022, and April 30, 2023. Telehospitalists supported ED clinicians in medical care decisions and facilitated patient disposition. Emergency department length of stay (LOS) and disposition were evaluated, as were hospital LOS, 30-day readmission, and in-hospital mortality. For patients discharged from the ED, 7-day ED readmission and subsequent hospitalization were evaluated.

Results: Telehospitalists discussed 550 "admit-likely" patients with ED clinicians: 105 patients (19.1%) discharged from the ED and avoided admission; 322 patients (58.5%) were admitted to local or nearby community hospitals; 123 patients (22.4%) transferred to the tertiary care facility. Emergency department LOS differed significantly among disposition groups, including patients discharged home (10.2 h), admitted to local hospitals (12.6 h), and transferred to tertiary care hospitalist services (14.9 h; p < 0.001). Hospital LOS and in-hospital mortality were not significantly different among disposition groups. Patients admitted locally had lower 30-day readmission compared to those transferred to tertiary care facility (odds ratio = 0.59 [0.36, 0.99], p = 0.048).

Discussion: Telehospitalists as triage clinicians is an innovative approach to support local ED clinicians and patients. Telehospitalists optimized hospital bed utilization and healthcare system resources by facilitating safe discharges to home and expediting tertiary care transfers when necessary.