Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare最新文献

BackgroundThere is an increasing demand for the provision of speech language pathology (SLP) services via telehealth. Therefore, we systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials comparing telehealth to face-to-face provision of SLP services.MethodsWe searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane, clinical trial registries, and conducted a citation analysis to identify trials. We included randomized trials comparing similar care delivered live via telehealth (phone or video), to face-to-face. Primary outcomes included: % syllables stuttered (%SS) (for individuals who stutter); change in sound pressure levels monologue (for individuals with Parkinson's disease); and key function scores (for other areas). Where data were sufficient, mean differences were calculated.ResultsNine randomized controlled trials were included; eight evaluated video and one evaluated phone telehealth. Risk of bias was generally low or unclear, excepting blinding. There were no significant differences at any time-point up to 18 months for %SS (mean difference, MD 0.1, 95% CI -0.4 to 0.6, p = 0.70). For people with Parkinson's disease, there was no difference between groups in change in sound pressure levels (monologue) (MD 0.6, 95% CI -1.2 to 2.5, p = 0.49). Four trials investigated interventions for speech sound disorder, voice disorder and post-stroke dysphagia and aphasia; they found no differences between telehealth service delivery and face-to-face delivery.ConclusionsEvidence suggests that the telehealth provision of SLP services may be a viable alternative to their provision face-to-face, particularly to people who stutter and people with Parkinson's disease. The key limitation is the small number of randomized controlled trials, as well as evidence on the quality of life, well-being and satisfaction, and economic outcomes.

IntroductionLanguage sampling is a widely used means of language assessment; it is based on the collection and transcription of a child's language production in various communicative contexts. The need for social distancing due to the COVID-19 pandemic impacted language sampling and speech and language therapy services in general. The in-person assessment became extremely challenging leading to the immediate increased use of telepractice in speech and language therapy. This scoping review aimed to identify the use of telepractice for language sampling in speech and language therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsA scoping review of existing literature was performed to collect evidence on using language sample collection via telepractice. A database search was conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Mendeley, Electronic, and grey bibliography in 2022. Articles were included if they met the inclusion criteria. The quality of each selected study was assessed using the modified critical appraisal skills program (CASP) checklist.ResultsSystematic searches identified 51 studies with six studies in total meeting the inclusion criteria. The results showed that telepractice was a necessary tool during the pandemic of COVID-19 to conduct language sampling in speech and language assessment.ConclusionSpeech and language therapists (SLTs) effectively collected language samples through telepractice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although, to date, the literature on language sampling via telepractice is limited. The need for SLTs to rely on telepractice for language sampling warrants further investigation.

BackgroundProviding telehealth care requires unique professionalism skills (i.e. telehealth etiquette) to ensure patients have a positive experience. Given the effect of patient-provider relationships on healthcare outcomes and the limited evidence for healthcare professionals to learn and practice these skills, developing a telehealth etiquette competency tool is necessary.MethodsThis multiround Delphi study utilized subject matter experts' opinions to validate a telehealth etiquette competency checklist, using Lawshe's content validity measurements. Panelists were diverse in professional backgrounds, years of experience, telehealth teaching, clinical experience, and involvement in telehealth professional society and governmental policy making.ResultsConsensus and validation were achieved on the checklist by the 17 panelists in Round 1 for 19 of 20 competencies. Following revisions based on their expert opinions, consensus was achieved by all 16 panelists in Round 2 for 20 competencies.DiscussionThe Telehealth Etiquette Competency Checklist (TECC) provides a validated telehealth etiquette tool that can be used by health professionals to improve their telehealth videoconsultations, thus enhancing patient satisfaction.

IntroductionSeveral barriers can preclude people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) from in-person exercise session participation. Telehealth may be an alternative mode of service delivery to increase uptake. We evaluated the feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of delivering group exercise via telehealth for people with T2D.MethodsSixteen people with T2D (age 59.9 ± 12.7 years, 63% male, duration of T2D 11.5 ± 11.1 years) underwent an 8-week telehealth-delivered group exercise intervention. Weekly supervised sessions incorporated whole-body aerobic and resistance exercises, followed by education. Feasibility was evaluated by recruitment, enrolment, attendance and attrition rates, the practicality of telehealth delivery, and participant feedback. Adverse events were monitored throughout (safety). Preliminary efficacy was determined from changes in glycaemic control, body composition, blood pressure, exercise capacity, neuromuscular strength/fitness, quality of life and physical activity levels. The agreement/reliability of in-person clinician-measured versus telehealth-supervised participant-self-measured assessments was also evaluated.ResultsFeasibility was supported by high attendance (97.1%) and low attrition (81%). All (100%) participants reported they would participate in telehealth-delivered exercise interventions in the future and would recommend them to other people with T2D. No serious adverse events were reported. There were improvements in hip circumference (Cohen's d -0.50), diastolic blood pressure (-0.75), exercise capacity (1.72), upper body strength (1.14), grip strength (0.58), health-related quality of life (0.76-0.81) and self-reported physical activity (1.14). Participant-self-measured assessment of body weight, 2-min step test and 30-sec sit-to-stand test were deemed acceptable.DiscussionTelehealth-delivered group exercise appears feasible, safe and efficacious for people with T2D. These findings warrant further exploration in a powered trial.Trial RegistrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000379718).

IntroductionTelehealth increases care accessibility to patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus but the duration of its implementation to sustain optimal glycaemic control remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the health outcomes of these patients using the Optimizing care of Patients via Telemedicine In Monitoring and aUgmenting their control of diabetes Mellitus (OPTIMUM) home tele-monitoring (HTM) system 6 months post-intervention, compared to standard care.MethodsAn open-labelled randomized controlled trial involving 330 participants with type-2 diabetes mellitus, aged 26-65 years, and suboptimal glycaemic control (HbA1c = 7.5%-10%) was conducted. Intervention group received OPTIMUM HTM for 6 months followed by usual care for another 6 months, while control group received usual care for 12 months. OPTIMUM HTM includes in-app video-based tele-education, tele-monitoring of the blood pressure, capillary glucose and weight via Bluetooth devices and mobile applications, followed by algorithm-based tele-management by the OPTIMUM HTM team. Assessments using self-care inventory scale and medication adherence were administered for both groups at baseline, 6-month, and 12-month timepoints.ResultsComplete data from 156 (intervention) and 159 (control) participants, with comparable demographic profiles, were analysed. Both groups showed a significant reduction in HbA1c from baseline (p < 0.001). From 6-month to 12-month time-points, the intervention group was twice as likely to maintain their HbA1c ≤ 8% (adjusted odds ratio = 2.02, 95%CI = 1.18-3.49; p < 0.011). The intervention group demonstrated higher scores for self-care behaviours (adjusted odds ratio = 3.83 [95%CI = 1.68-5.97], p = 0.001) and not skipping medications (adjusted odds ratio = 2.32 [95%CI = 1.09-4.97], p = 0.030) at 12 months.DiscussionThe OPTIMUM HTM system enabled patients to maintain their glycaemic control beyond the intervention period. The favourable outcomes could be the effect of telehealth in sustaining self-care behaviour and medication adherence.

IntroductionTelehealth is a growing part of the healthcare field, and healthcare professionals and trainees require training not only on the clinical skills relevant to telehealth but also on professionalism skills or telehealth etiquette. As healthcare outcomes are influenced by the patient-provider relationship, training healthcare professionals on telehealth etiquette skills is imperative.MethodsForty-eight healthcare professionals across different disciplines, work settings, and experience levels participated in a telehealth etiquette skills educational intervention workshop wherein their knowledge and readiness to use the skills (specific to technology, environment, confidentiality, and communication) were assessed before and after the workshop.ResultsPaired sample t-tests revealed that participating in the educational intervention resulted in statistically significant improvements in knowledge and perceived readiness to use telehealth etiquette skills pertinent to technology, environment, and communication. There were no associations between participants' personal factors and post-educational intervention changes.DiscussionStudy findings are significant and suggest that training healthcare professionals in telehealth etiquette have a positive impact. Since there is a known positive association between provider communication and patient satisfaction and a known association between patient satisfaction and healthcare outcomes, gaining telehealth etiquette skills is critical for promoting a positive patient-provider relationship via telehealth.

BackgroundWhile telemedicine has been beneficial in oncology by reducing infectious exposure and improving access for patients with poor functional status, it also has intrinsic limitations, including the inability to perform a physical exam, which could lead to increased downstream utilization in this population at high risk of medical decompensation. We conducted a retrospective cohort study investigating the relationship between telemedicine use in oncology and subsequent outpatient oncology encounters, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations.MethodsWe included outpatient oncology encounters, including telemedicine and in-person visits, occurring between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022 at a large academic health system. Unadjusted descriptive statistics and multiple linear regressions were used to estimate subsequent outpatient oncology visits, ED visits, and hospitalizations within 30 days of an index visit based on modality (telemedicine versus in-person). The multiple regressions were adjusted for various demographic and clinical characteristics, including palliative care visits, baseline utilization, recent chemotherapy, and comorbidities.ResultsOur cohort included 63,722 patients with 689,356 outpatient encounters, of which 639,217 (92.7%) were in-person and 50,139 (7.3%) were telemedicine visits. Patients on average had 0.91 outpatient oncology visits, 0.04 ED visits, and 0.05 hospitalizations within 30 days following an index encounter. In our adjusted analyses, telemedicine was associated with 13.7 fewer downstream outpatient oncology visits (95% CI 12.5-14.9; p < 0.001) per 100 index encounters, 0.7 fewer ED visits (95% CI 0.4-1.0; p < 0.001) per 100 index encounters and 0.9 fewer hospitalizations (95% CI 0.6-1.3; p < 0.001) per 100 index encounters compared to in-person visits.ConclusionsContrary to our hypothesis, oncology patients who had a telemedicine visit had fewer follow-up outpatient oncology encounters, ED visits and hospitalizations after 30 days than those with in-person visits. Future studies should further investigate the efficacy of telemedicine in oncology and outline specific scenarios for appropriate use in this and other populations.

IntroductionVirtual care and remote monitoring were widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, early evaluations of effectiveness were often inconclusive due to low rates of enrolment and limited data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual care in managing individuals in community-based self-isolation and quarantine in Australia during this pandemic.MethodsA retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted of individuals admitted to a virtual hospital in Sydney who either tested positive for COVID-19 and required self-isolation, or tested negative but still needed to self-isolate, amidst the Delta wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Outcome measures included health service utilisation, in-hospital mortality, patient-reported experience measures (PREM), and cost savings resulting from avoided emergency department (ED) presentations.ResultsOut of 9571 individuals admitted, 8544 (89.3%) had COVID-19. Clinical deterioration or acute illness occurred in 2477 (25.9%) individuals, of whom 890 (9.3%) were referred to ED for further assessment or investigation, and 614 (6.4%) were admitted for inpatient treatment. Overall mortality was 0.2%. Out of 1020 individuals who completed the PREM survey, 846 (82.9%) rated the overall virtual care experience as 'good' or 'very good'. Avoided ED presentations possibly resulted in cost savings estimated between AU$691,214 and AU$2,994,540.ConclusionVirtual care was successfully used to manage a large number of individuals in community-based self-isolation and quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scalable pathways for triage, monitoring and clinical escalation via telehealth ensured patient safety and acceptability, and alleviated strain on the broader health system.

IntroductionUkraine's health and trauma system has been detrimentally impacted since the start of the Russian invasion in February 2022. Use of telemedicine became critical to providing timely medical care. As such, the aim of this study was to describe telemedicine's use in the health and trauma system of Ukraine following the full-scale invasion.MethodsWe conducted qualitative key informant interviews with military and civilian health care workers using an expanded version of the Global Trauma System Evaluation Tool which had components focusing on telemedicine use. Thematic content analysis was used to derive key telemedicine themes from interviews.ResultsWe conducted 36 key informant interviews. Most respondents described using telemedicine through informal means of communication such as messaging apps to meet patient care needs. Concerns and challenges with use of telemedicine included weapons targeting, internet connections and safety of communications from Russian hackers. A unified system for telemedicine would greatly improve use in country both during and post conflict.DiscussionTelemedicine use has rapidly increased in Ukraine during the current conflict particularly in the scope of providing trauma care when numerous specialties are needed. Development of a unified, secure telemedicine system with mechanisms for integrating multinational medical support would aid in providing swift medical care to persons injured in the conflict or unable to access a specialty provider in their proximity.

In this case, we describe the completion of emergency front-of-neck access by a novice provider facilitated by specialist telehealth support. A facility with limited advanced airway skills requested telehealth support for a critically unwell patient with severe hypoxic respiratory failure and acute delirium. Attempts to temporise his physiology with ketamine-facilitated non-invasive ventilation were unsuccessful, and he proceeded to rapid sequence intubation. Ultimately, intubation was unsuccessful and attempts at ventilation by laryngeal mask also failed. A Cannot Intubate, Cannot Oxygenate scenario was identified. The referring team had significant anxiety about performing a surgical front-of-neck access procedure. However, with telehealth support, this was ultimately completed by a novice provider, and the patient stabilised. The key issue identified was the need for the telehealth provider to take clinical governance of the procedure. The referring team also required assistance in completing an adequate neck incision, responding to bleeding, and determining the preferred technique.