Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare最新文献

In this case, we describe the remote telehealth leadership of emergent tube thoracostomy in a patient with a critical respiratory status. The patient had presented to a small rural health care facility with breathlessness and hypoxia despite supplemental oxygen. A subsequent chest x-ray revealed a large pneumothorax requiring emergent treatment to prevent respiratory demise. Due to their location, the arrival of a critical care team would be delayed, and the local staff had very limited prior experience with chest procedures. Through remote telehealth leadership, the local team was guided through initial attempts at the Seldinger tube thoracostomy technique, before progressing to an open approach following failure of the initial attempt. Ultimately, the patient was stabilised and remained admitted locally, avoiding aeromedical retrieval. Key learnings included the need to develop a shared mental model of the procedure, responding to local equipment limitations, the leadership response to initial technique failure, and maintenance of situational awareness. This furthers evidence provided in prior case reports that high acuity low occurrence critical care procedures can be facilitated via remote telehealth support.

IntroductionThe rapid expansion of virtual ambulatory care has included both video and audio-only modalities. The impact of visit modality on patient experience is poorly understood, particularly in the interplay with social health determinants and technical aspects of virtual care. We sought to characterize differences in the patient-reported experience of virtual care between video and audio-only modalities, and to understand drivers of these differences.MethodsWe analyzed one year of ambulatory virtual visits with linked patient experience data from a US health system. Using nested logistic models, with a patient's likelihood to recommend the provider as the primary outcome, adjusting for patient- and physician-level covariates, we explored differences in experience by visit modality (video vs audio-only), including across demographic groups. We further assessed the impact of modality on patients' experience with technical aspects of virtual care.ResultsAmong 90,670 virtual encounters with patient experience data, 16% were audio-only. Compared with video-based encounters, audio-only visits were associated with lower likelihood to recommend overall (OR 0.75; 95%CI 0.70-0.80) and worse experience with many technical aspects. Black patients were more likely to have audio-only encounters and worse overall patient experience. This disparity persisted after adjusting for visit modality and was partly mediated by differences in perceived respectful provider communication and associated interpersonal aspects of care.DiscussionAudio-only virtual care remains central to ensuring access to care, but poses challenges for patient experience. Interventions and investments targeted at improving technical facets and provider communication are needed, particularly for ensuring equitable experience across racial groups.

IntroductionTo investigate the effectiveness of the remote video-based Strengthening and Stretching for Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Hand (SARAH) exercise program in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with wrist involvement.MethodsSeventy-three individuals were included in the study. Wrist joint position sense, wrist joint range of motion, wrist pain, wrist morning stiffness, subjective and objective hand function, grip strength, and disease-related health status were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks. Following the baseline assessment, participants were randomly assigned into two groups as SARAH and Control. All participants maintained their pharmacological therapy. The SARAH group received SARAH exercise videos via a free messaging platform (WhatsApp Messenger) weekly and performed the program daily for 12 weeks. No additional intervention was provided to the control group.ResultsForty-nine individuals (SARAH group = 28, control group = 21) completed all study procedures. Both per-protocol and intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses showed significant improvements in all parameters in the SARAH group (p < 0.05), while no statistically significant changes were detected in the control group (p > 0.05). When the changes were compared between the groups, SARAH group showed greater improvements regarding the changes in wrist joint position sense, wrist flexion, extension (only in ITT analysis) and radial deviation joint range of motion, wrist pain, wrist morning stiffness duration (only in ITT analysis), hand function, grip strength, and disease-related health status compared to the control group (p < 0.05).DiscussionA 12-week remote video-based SARAH exercise program provides additional benefits in individuals with RA who present wrist related problems when added to pharmacological therapy.

IntroductionThe Veterans Health Administration (VHA) prioritizes use of connected care technologies to enhance access and outcomes. The context in which connected care is implemented is crucial, yet difficult to measure, due to its subjective and complex nature. This evaluation examined alignment among stakeholder perceptions of context related to connected care implementation across VHA.MethodsA national, cross-sectional survey assessed perceptions of 11 contextual factors relevant to connected care implementation as identified in published reviews within the implementation science literature. Across 142 VHA facilities and 18 regions, surveys were sent to four stakeholder groups: clinical team members, connected care coordinators, facility leadership, and regional leadership. Mean scores for each factor were compared between stakeholder groups using Welch's ANOVA and Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc comparisons.ResultsA total of 5541 respondents (36.1% response rate) participated. Organizational Culture and Climate was rated the most favorable contextual factor (mean = 3.9, SD = 0.7), while Financial Resources was perceived as least favorable (mean = 3.0, SD = 1.0). Significant differences emerged between the perceptions of frontline workers (clinical team members, connected care coordinators) and leadership (facility, regional). Clinical team members rated nearly all contextual factors less favorably than facility leadership. Coordinators similarly rated most factors less favorably than leadership.DiscussionFindings highlight a misalignment between leadership and frontline workers in their perceptions of organizational context for implementing connected care technologies. Leadership viewed key contextual factors (e.g. Organizational Readiness to Change, Leadership Support) more favorably than frontline workers. This misalignment may impact implementation success, suggesting a need for strategies to better align stakeholder perceptions.

IntroductionSince 2021, the world has been facing a cost-of-living crisis which has negatively affected population health. Meanwhile, little is known about its impact on patients' preferences to access care. We aimed to analyse public preference for the modality of consultation (virtual vs face-to-face) before and after the onset of crisis and factors associated with these preferences.MethodsAn online cross-sectional survey was administered to the public in the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy and Sweden. McNemar tests were conducted to analyse pre- and post-crisis differences in preferences; logistic regression was used to examine the demographic factors associated with public preferences.ResultsSince the onset of crisis, the number of people choosing virtual consultations has increased in the United Kingdom (7.0% vs 9.5% P < 0.001), Germany (6.6% vs 8.6%, P < 0.008) and Italy (6.0% vs 9.8%, P < 0.001). Before the crisis, a stronger preference for virtual consultations was observed in people from urban areas (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.05-1.56), while increasing age was associated with a lower preference for virtual care (OR 0.966, 95% CI 0.961-0.972). Younger people were more likely to switch to virtual care, while change to face-to-face was associated with younger age and lower income (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.12-1.62). Older adults were less likely to change preference.ConclusionsSince the onset of the cost-of-living crisis, public preference for virtual consultations has increased, particularly in younger population. This contrasts with older adults and people with lower-than-average incomes. The rationale behind patients' preferences should be investigated to ensure patients can access their preferred modality of care.

IntroductionOsteoporotic hip fracture is a major health problem. Falls, the primary cause, might lead to a persistent fear of falling (FoF) among older adults, affecting their daily activities and rehabilitation. While in-person interventions exist, limited research is available on the effects of tele-rehabilitation on the FoF after a hip fracture. Thus, this study aims to test the association of the @ctivehip tele-rehabilitation programme on reducing the levels of FoF experienced by both older adults with hip fracture and their family caregivers.MethodsA non-randomised controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier: NCT02968589) that compared a webpage-based tele-rehabilitation (@ctivehip) against usual care. Fear of falling was assessed using the Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International. Patients' functional status was evaluated using the Functional Independence Measure. Physical performance was assessed by the Timed Up and Go test and Short Physical Performance Battery. We conducted a per-protocol analysis as the primary outcome, and an intention-to-treat approach as secondary analysis.ResultsA total of 71 patients with hip fracture (78.75 ± 6.12 years, 75% women) and their family caregivers participated. Participants in the intervention showed a higher decrease in FoF in comparison to those in the usual care (0.5 Cohen's d; p = 0.042). The reduction in FoF resulting from participation in the tele-rehabilitation programme was mediated by improvements in functional status by 79%. The @ctivehip programme did not decrease FoF of family caregivers.Discussion@ctivehip is associated with a reduction of the FoF in older adults with hip fractures, but not in their family caregivers, with the reduction being mostly explained by improvements in the patients' functional status. Although the intervention seems promising, it should not be applied in clinical settings until confirmed by appropriate-designed randomised clinical trials.

BackgroundTelemedicine has gained traction in surgical subspecialties, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to identify whether telemedicine can be appropriately integrated within surgical oncology practice.MethodsThis retrospective study evaluated patients who received either telemedicine or office follow-up after undergoing surgical oncology operations between 2016 and 2021. The telemedicine group (TG) and office group (OG) received a 15-question survey regarding their satisfaction with their care. Patient outcomes and responses were analyzed utilizing propensity-score matching in 1:1 fashion.ResultsTelemedicine group and OG each had 21 patients. Length of stay, complication frequency, follow-up frequency, and readmissions frequency within 90-days were comparable between groups. Telemedicine group expressed comparable satisfaction with postoperative care relative to OG (95.2% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.61). All telemedicine patients said they would utilize telemedicine again in the future and would recommend its use to others.ConclusionPatient satisfaction with postoperative telemedicine follow-up is comparable to those with in-person follow-up.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the precision of a web-based tool in measuring visual acuity (VA) in ophthalmic patients, comparing it to the traditional in-clinic evaluation using a Snellen chart, considered the gold standard.MethodsWe conducted a prospective and in-clinic validation comparing the Eyecare Visual Acuity Test® to the standard Snellen chart, with patients undergoing both tests sequentially. Patients wore their standard spectacles as needed for both tests. Inclusion criteria involved individuals above 18 years with VA equal to or better than +1 logMar (20/200) in each eye. VA measurements were converted from Snellen to logMAR, and statistical analyses included Bland-Altman and descriptive statistics.ResultsThe study, encompassing 322 patients and 644 eyes, compared Eyecare Visual Acuity Test® to conventional methods, revealing a statistically insignificant mean difference (0.01 logMAR, P = 0.1517). Bland-Altman analysis showed a narrow 95% limit of agreement (0.22 to -0.23 logMAR), indicating concordance, supported by a significant Pearson correlation (r = 0.61, P < 0.001) between the two assessments.ConclusionThe Eyecare Visual Acuity Test® demonstrates accuracy and reliability, with the potential to facilitate home monitoring, triage, and remote consultation. In future research, it is important to validate the Eyecare Visual Acuity Test® accuracy across varied age cohorts, including pediatric and geriatric populations, as well as among individuals presenting with specific comorbidities like cataract, uveitis, keratoconus, age-related macular disease, and amblyopia.

Participatory design (PD) is a methodology that emphasizes user participation in the design of new technologies to leverage change within organizations and services. PD originated in the computer science field in the 1970s and 1980s when new programs and technologies were developed to empower workers, by involving them in decisions that affected them. PD in health research has been proven to change clinical practice. Genuine user involvement that includes all stakeholders, and robust collaborations across sciences, sectors, and disciplines are basic elements of successful research to change clinical practice and to implement novel technical and organizational approaches. This paper summarizes seven case studies involving the use of PD in telehealth research. All cases presented promoted organizational changes supported by health information and communications technology, and have been implemented at either international, national, regional, or local levels. We describe how PD can be applied in health sciences and used to facilitate organizational changes, new perspectives, and new communications methods. The relevance and suitability of PD as a research design in health science is explained, and recommendations for conducting PD studies in telehealth research are presented. In PD, mutual learning and co-creation is facilitated. Consequently, learning from users, rather than studying them, corroborates our understanding and the emergence of new knowledge.

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems globally, necessitating innovative care models like hospital-at-home and virtual care programs. The Influenzer telemedicine program aims to deliver hospital-led monitoring and treatment to patients at home. Integrating telemedicine technology with domestic visits provides an alternative to traditional hospitalization, with the aim of easing the burden on healthcare facilities without compromising patient safety. To evaluate the effectiveness of the Influenzer program, a randomized controlled trial is proposed. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of the proposed clinical trial design.MethodsA non-randomized feasibility study was conducted at the Department of Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases at Nordsjaellands Hospital offering a telemedicine-supported early discharge program to patients with lower respiratory tract infections, including COVID-19. The feasibility of trial procedures, including recruitment, adherence, and retention, was analyzed. Also, participants' characteristics and trajectory during the intervention, including telemedicine and domestic services, were assessed.ResultsNineteen patients were enrolled from June 2022 to April 2023 and treated at home. Forty patients were not enrolled as 15 (25%) were non-eligible according to study protocol, 15 (25%) refused to participate and 10 (17%) had not been approached. Subjects treated at home had comparable clinical outcomes to those treated in the acute hospital, no major safety incidences occurred and patients were highly satisfied. Participants demonstrated 99% adherence to planned daily monitoring activities. In total, 63% completed all survey assessments at least partially including baseline, at discharge, and 3 months post-discharge, while 89% participated in a follow-up interview. No participants withdrew their consent.ConclusionsThe feasibility study documented that the Influenzer home-hospital program was feasible and well accepted in a Scandinavian setting in terms of no withdrawals and excellent participant adherence to the planned daily monitoring activities. Challenges in the organizational structures including patient recruitment and data collection required resolution prior to our randomized clinical trial. Insights from this feasibility study have led to the improved design of the final Influenzer program evaluation trial.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05087082. Registered on 18 August 2021.