Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery最新文献

Background: Fixation of displaced radial head fractures using miniplates is technically challenging and has some drawbacks like hardware prominence and limitation of forearm rotation. Fixation by headless compression screws has emerged as a less invasive alternative to miniplates. This study compares the radiological and functional outcomes of both methods of fixation.

Methods: This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted at an academic level 1 trauma center. Sixty patients with displaced isolated radial head fractures were randomized to treatment using either headless compression screws or miniplates in 2 parallel groups. At the final follow-up of 18 months, patients were evaluated radiologically for union and clinically using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), elbow range of motion, grip strength, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and the Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm, and Hand (DASH) score.

Results: Union was achieved after 8±1.7 weeks in the screw group and after 8.5±2.7 weeks in the plate group. The MEPS was significantly better in the screw group (87.7±10.7) than in the plate group (80.5±13.9). However, this difference is below the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the MEPS and as such may not be clinically meaningful. No significant differences were observed between both groups regarding flexion, extension ranges, VAS, grip strength, or the DASH score. However, supination and pronation were significantly better in the screw group. The rate of complications was higher in the plate group (26.7%) than in the screw group (3.3%).

Conclusion: Both techniques yielded comparable outcomes with better forearm rotation, a lower complication rate, and a lower hardware removal rate in the screw group.

Relationships in Advocacy form the basis for physicians to help their practices and patients navigate the challenges and complexities of the modern medical world. John Joyce, MD is the US Representative from Pennsylvania's 13th Congressional District. He serves as a member of the powerful Energy and Commerce Committee and has a leadership role on their Health Care Subcommittee. He is a member of the Doctors Caucus, a group of members from both parties with a health care background receiving weekly briefings on current health issues. He is a board-certified Dermatologist and spent many years in private practice in Central Pennsylvania. I have known him for over 30 years and serve as the AAOS Ambassador to Dr Joyce. Through an interview format Dr Joyce discusses the value of advocacy to him now that he is on the legislative side, how best for physicians to advocate for their patients and practices, and what strategies are most effective, and which are less effective or counterproductive. He shares what he has learned that would have benefitted him when he was a full time practicing private practice clinician about advocacy and relationships with legislators. His experience in both medicine and in Congress make him especially unique to educate us on the value of relationships in advocacy for physicians.

Background: Interscalene catheters (ISC) are considered as the gold standard for perioperative pain control after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for interscalene blocks (ISB) or the addition of dexamethasone to ISBs have both presented as additional options for extended analgesia. We aimed to compare the efficacy of LB to a single shot ISB (SISB) with added dexamethasone to an ISC. We hypothesized that a single injection of LB or an ISB with a dexamethasone will provide non-inferior duration and quality of analgesia compared to ISC.

Methods: A single centered triple blinded randomized controlled trial evaluated patients undergoing elective primary TSA. Patients were randomized to 3 groups, Group A (control): 0.5% bupivacaine 15 ml with a rescue catheter left in situ (0.125% bupivacaine infusion), Group B: 0.5% bupivacaine 14 ml with 4mg (1 ml) dexamethasone with a catheter left in situ (saline infusion), Group C: 10 ml of liposomal bupivacaine (133 mg) with 0.5% bupivacaine 5 ml, with a catheter left in situ (saline infusion). The primary outcome was the worst NRS (numeric rating scale) measured on arrival to PACU, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 36 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes recorded were time to first analgesic request, intraoperative opioid consumption, total inpatient opioid consumption, arm weakness, arm numbness, time of analgesia duration, time of motor recovery, sensory testing using pinprick on POD1, Q36, Q48, hand strength assessment using dynamometer POD1, Q36, Q48, PACU and hospital length of stay.

Results: We analyzed 72 patients in 3 groups (Group A 24, group B 24, Group C 24). The pre-surgery physical function scores were similar between groups. The change in postoperative pain was not different among the three groups. All 3 groups demonstrated an increase in the postoperative values, a change that was not statistically significant between groups. Likewise, no difference in the mental function score was seen within or between groups. No differences in sleep quality or satisfaction were seen among groups (P values 0.405 and 1.00, respectively). No adverse events were reported in all groups.

Conclusions: No significant difference was demonstrated between a single injection ISB with dexamethasone, a LB injection and an ISC. Given the equivalence in analgesia provided with these three modalities, providers should carefully consider the option that best fits each patient. Thus, a single injection of LB or single injection of bupivacaine with dexamethasone provides similar analgesic efficacy compared to ISC.

Background: The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic suture anchor fixation and open screw fixation for acute large anterior glenoid rim fractures.

Methods: This study enrolled patients with acute large anterior glenoid rim fractures treated with arthroscopic suture anchor fixation (group A) or open screw fixation (group O) from January 2013 to June 2020 with a minimum follow-up of＞2 years. The Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Rowe score, Constant score, range of motion (ROM), recurrent instability rate, and complications were recorded as clinical results. The quality of the postoperative reduction, reconstructed glenoid sizes, rate of fracture healing, and progression of osteoarthritis (OA) were evaluated as radiological outcomes.

Results: This retrospective study included 66 patients, including 37 in Group A and 29 in Group O with a mean follow-up of 46.9 (range, 24.3-94.2) months and a mean patient age of 46.8 (range, 21-69) years. No significant differences were found in the clinical outcomes between the two groups. A significant ROM limitation in all planes was found in both groups and group O showed more limitations in external rotation at the side (ERs) (18° vs. 10°, P = 0.002). The reduction quality was better in group O (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of reconstructed glenoid size (101.6% ± 4.6% vs. 100.6% ± 7.1%, P = 0.460) and the rate of OA progression (26.9% vs. 20%, P = 0.525).

Conclusion: Arthroscopic suture anchor fixation and open screw fixation achieved similar clinical outcomes, reconstructed glenoid sizes, and OA progression in patients with acute large anterior glenoid rim fractures. Arthroscopic suture fixation showed a poorer quality of reduction but less ERs limitations.

Background: Medical malpractice represents a significant economic cost in healthcare. Increasingly large damage claims by professional athletes against physicians have raised concerns about the medicolegal challenges in caring for high-level athletes.

Methods: An online proprietary legal research database was queried for lawsuits related to malpractice in the care of professional and amateur athletes from 1992-2023. Demographics of plaintiffs and defendants, details of lawsuit filings and damages claimed were recorded for all cases, settlements, and jury verdicts. Descriptive statistics, linear regression, as well as univariate analysis of demographic factors and damage claims in inflation-adjusted 2023 dollars was performed.

Results: Eighty-eight lawsuits were recorded from 1992-2023. The sum of indemnities exceeded 186 million in 2023 inflation-adjusted United States Dollars. Football players were the most commonly represented athletes (n=26) and represented 49% of total financial awards. Fourteen cases (16%) involved treatment of the upper extremity. Professional and collegiate level of play was associated with higher damages in favor of plaintiffs when compared to other levels of play. No other demographic was associated with higher financial awards. Linear regression showed a significant positive trend with an increasing inflation-adjusted compensation for plaintiff verdicts in the last 30 years.

Conclusions: There is an increasing medicolegal financial risk associated with the care of athletes. This is higher in collegiate and professional levels of play. As physicians, insurers and institutions adjust to these financial risks, care must be taken to avoid ramifications on the availability and quality of care provided to athletes. Shoulder and elbow surgeons may consider additional preoperative counseling, legal waiver forms regarding malpractice claims and advocacy for medical malpractice reforms in the care of athletes with high earning potential to mitigate these increasing financial risks.

Background: As orthopedic surgery becomes increasingly competitive, orthopedic surgeons are now pursuing advanced degrees more frequently to enhance their resumes or gain additional expertise. The specific impact of this additional training and education on a surgeon's career trajectory is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to understand the impact of an advanced degree on the academic career of orthopedic shoulder and elbow surgeons.

Methods: Orthopedic shoulder and elbow fellowship-trained surgeons were identified using the directory listed on the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons website. Demographics, education, and current professional roles were obtained. Research productivity was obtained using SCOPUS and Google Scholar. Advanced degrees were defined as those additional to the primary medical degree (Doctor of Medicine [MD] or Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine [DO]). Outcome measures collected included timing of advanced degree obtainment, current academic and leadership roles, leadership on journal editorial boards, and research productivity. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test to determine the association of advanced degrees on outcome measures.

Results: In total, 893 orthopedic shoulder and elbow surgeons were identified, of whom 129 had advanced degrees. Most common advanced degrees included Master of Science (MS/MSc; 43%), Master of Business Administration (MBA; 23%), and Doctor of Philosophy (PhD; 13%). The most common period of degree obtainment was before medical school (35%) with the least common times being after medical school/before residency (0.9%) and between residency and fellowship training (0.9%). Surgeons who held advanced degrees demonstrated greater research productivity, with a higher h-index (p < 0.001), a greater number of citations (p < 0.001), and more publications (p < 0.001). Of the 523 shoulder and elbow surgeons who worked at an academic institution, those holding advanced degrees were more likely to serve as orthopedic department chair (p < 0.001) and serve an editorial board position (< 0.001).

Conclusion: This study found that having an advanced degree as an orthopedic shoulder and elbow surgeon was linked to higher research impact and productivity and an increased likelihood of becoming a department chair and holding an editorial position. These significant findings can help future trainees and department leadership in understanding the importance and impact of additional training on career trajectories for academic faculty.

Background: Humeral component retroversion (HcRV) can be customized to match native humeral retroversion (RV) during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). However, assessing postoperative individualized HcRV using computed tomography (CT) scans without an elbow can be challenging. Therefore, we developed a new method to obtain the HcRV and evaluated its reliability.

Methods: A total of 106 patients underwent RTSA using a single implant, in which the humeral component was implanted based on the preoperative humeral RV (Pre_HRV) using a bilateral CT scan of the elbow. Intraoperatively, a retroversion guide with version hole at 10° intervals was used; Pre_HRV was converted to 5° increments and applied for humeral component implantation. The axis of intertubercular sulcus (ITS) was defined as the line perpendicular to the intertubercular line, and the angle between the axis of ITS and the trans-epicondylar axis was defined as the bicipital groove rotation (BGR). ITS orientation was defined as the angle between the axis of ITS and the central axis of the humeral head. Since the BGR does not change, the postoperative implanted HcRV (Post_HcRV)f is calculated as the BGR minus the value of the postoperative ITS orientation. An agreement analysis was performed between Post_HcRV and both the intraoperatively applied humeral RV (I_HRV) and Pre_HRV, as well as between the pre- and postoperative ITS orientations. The humeral component's insertional errors were also evaluated.

Results: All radiologic measurements exhibited excellent inter- and intra-observer reliabilities. The reliabilities between Post_HcRV and both I_HRV and Pre_HRV, as well as between pre- and postoperative ITS orientations, showed excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.953, 0.952, and 0.873, respectively). The humeral component was inserted within 5° in 86.8% of the planned humeral RV cases.

Conclusions: The HcRV measured using the BGR and ITS orientations achieved good accuracy for restoring the planned humeral RV using a retroversion guide with the forearm axis. Therefore, this new radiological measurement method can aid orthopedic surgeons in confirming Post_HcRV on CT scans without an elbow.

Background: Reduced bone density is recognized as a predictor for potential complications in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). While humeral and glenoid planning based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans assist in implant selection and position, reproducible methods for quantifying the patients' bone density are currently not available. The purpose of this study was to perform bone density analyses including patient specific calibration in an RSA cohort based on preoperative CT imaging. It was hypothesized that preoperative CT bone density measures would provide objective quantification of the patients' humeral bone quality.

Methods: This study consisted of three parts, (1) analysis of a patient-specific calibration method in cadaveric CT scans, (2) retrospective application in a clinical RSA cohort, and (3) clustering and classification with machine learning models. Forty cadaveric shoulders were scanned in a clinical CT and compared regarding calibration with density phantoms, air muscle, and fat (patient-specific) or standard Hounsfield unit. Post-scan patient-specific calibration was used to improve the extraction of three-dimensional regions of interest for retrospective bone density analysis in a clinical RSA cohort (n=345). Machine learning models were used to improve the clustering (Hierarchical Ward) and classification (Support Vector Machine (SVM)) of low bone densities in the respective patients.

Results: The patient-specific calibration method demonstrated improved accuracy with excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for cylindrical cancellous bone densities (ICC>0.75). Clustering partitioned the training data set into a high-density subgroup consisting of 96 patients and a low-density subgroup consisting of 146 patients, showing significant differences between these groups. The SVM showed optimized prediction accuracy of low and high bone densities compared to conventional statistics in the training (accuracy=91.2%; AUC=0.967) and testing (accuracy=90.5 %; AUC=0.958) data set.

Conclusion: Preoperative CT scans can be used to quantify the proximal humeral bone quality in patients undergoing RSA. The use of machine learning models and patient-specific calibration on bone mineral density demonstrated that multiple 3D bone density scores improved the accuracy of objective preoperative bone quality assessment. The trained model could provide preoperative information to surgeons treating patients with potentially poor bone quality.

Background: The flexor-pronator muscles (FPM) and their common tendon (CT) are essential in protecting the medial ulnar collateral ligament against elbow valgus stress during pitching. This study aimed to investigate the effect of repetitive pitching on FPM strength and CT stiffness.

Methods: Fifteen healthy males (mean age: 21.8 ± 1.3-years-old) with over 5 years of baseball experience performed a series of 100 full-effort fastball pitches. We measured grip and isolated digital flexion strength of the second, third, and fourth digits before and after the pitching task. The decline in muscle strength was determined using the rate of change in muscle strength after pitching relative to that before. CT stiffness was measured using a hand-held myotonometer device at rest and during grip motion at 50% maximum voluntary contraction. The increase in CT stiffness during grip motion relative to rest was calculated as the augmentation rate of CT stiffness. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the changes in grip strength, digital flexion strength, and CT stiffness due to pitching. Additionally, the reduction rate of muscle strength was compared among various strength variables. Correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the relationships between the augmentation rate of CT stiffness after pitching and the reduction rate in any muscle strength.

Results: Grip and isolated digital flexion strengths decreased significantly after pitching (P < 0.01). The decline in muscle strength was significantly higher for all isolated digital strengths than that for grip strength (P < 0.05). CT stiffness was augmented with grip motion compared to that at rest pre- and post-pitching (P < 0.001). However, no change in CT stiffness due to pitching was observed, regardless of the grip motion (P > 0.05). Additionally, a lower augmentation rate of CT stiffness after pitching was moderately associated with the greater reduction rate of the second digital flexion strength (r = 0.607, P = 0.016) without other relationships.

Conclusion: This study found reduced grip and digital flexion strength after pitching; with no change in CT stiffness. However, given the consequences of correlation analyses, individuals with a more prominent reduction in second digital flexion strength due to pitching were impaired in CT stiffness augmentation after pitching. Digital flexion strength represents the strength of the flexor digitorum superficial; therefore, this study suggests that forearm FPM, particularly the second digit of the flexor digitorum superficial, is an important factor for enhancing CT stiffness.

Background: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a common procedure that may be considered for patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Patients undergoing this procedure may be afflicted by comorbid conditions, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), which may impact odds of various postoperative complications.

Methods: Adult patients with and without SLE who underwent TSA (anatomic or reverse) were queried from the Jan 2010 to Oct 2022 PearlDiver M165 database. Patients with and without SLE were matched (1:4) based on age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Ninety-day adverse events and five-year implant survival were assessed and compared with multivariable analysis. Sub-analyses were done for SLE patients with and without a prescription of immunomodulatory therapy (IMT - corticosteroids, hydroxychloroquine, and/or biologics) within 90 days prior to surgery and compared to non-SLE patients with multivariable analyses. Lastly, SLE patients with and without a 90-day history of IMT were directly compared with multivariate logistic regression. A Bonferroni correction was applied to univariable analyses and multivariable regressions.

Results: Of 211,832 TSA patients identified, SLE was noted for 2,228 (1.1%). After matching, 8,261 patients without SLE and 2,085 patients with SLE were selected. SLE patients were at an increased odds of 90-day aggregated events including severe (OR=3.50), minor (OR=3.13), all (OR=2.35), and orthopedic-related (OR=1.41) adverse events (p<0.0030 for all). There was no difference in 5-year implant survival. Of those with SLE, IMT medications were being received by 1,267 (60.8%). Any, severe, minor, and orthopedic 90-day adverse events were significantly elevated for both those with and without IMT relative to those without SLE (p<0.0030 for all except for orthopedic-related adverse events for those not on IMT which were not significant). Relative to those not on IMT medications, those on IMT medications were at significantly higher odds of any, severe, minor, and orthopedic-related adverse events.

Conclusion: Following TSA, patients with SLE were found to be at an increased odds of 90-day adverse events but not of 5-year revisions. Furthermore, those on IMT medications were at higher risk of any, severe, minor, and orthopedic-related adverse events compared to those who were not on these medications. These findings may help with patient counselling and surgical planning when those with SLE are considered for TSA.