Pub Date : 2023-01-13DOI: 10.1080/0167482X.2023.2169125
Jonathan Schaffir, Vivian Pramataroff-Hamburger
Psychosomatic obstetrics and gynecology (POG) encompasses a wide variety of topics. While specialists in this field agree that it is important for practicing clinicians to be familiar with psychosomatic issues related to women's health, there is no consensus about the best practices for teaching and assessing this knowledge, or even which are the topics that should be included. By examining existing literature on educational methodology, this paper aims to suggest best practices that are proven useful in teaching issues related to POG. The paper considers learning objectives for what should be taught, recommendations as to best practices for curriculum delivery, and suggestions for how to assess learners' ability to meet the objectives. Establishing guidelines for teaching POG may be useful for learners at different levels and in various settings.
{"title":"Best practices for teaching psychosomatic obstetrics and gynecology.","authors":"Jonathan Schaffir, Vivian Pramataroff-Hamburger","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2023.2169125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2023.2169125","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychosomatic obstetrics and gynecology (POG) encompasses a wide variety of topics. While specialists in this field agree that it is important for practicing clinicians to be familiar with psychosomatic issues related to women's health, there is no consensus about the best practices for teaching and assessing this knowledge, or even which are the topics that should be included. By examining existing literature on educational methodology, this paper aims to suggest best practices that are proven useful in teaching issues related to POG. The paper considers learning objectives for what should be taught, recommendations as to best practices for curriculum delivery, and suggestions for how to assess learners' ability to meet the objectives. Establishing guidelines for teaching POG may be useful for learners at different levels and in various settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"44 1","pages":"2169125"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10734963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/0167482X.2021.1985452
Maryam Shirzadi, Negin Farshchian, Arash Nazarpour, Soudabeh Eskandari, Fahimeh Kahrari, Hamed Abdollahpour Ranjbar, Somayeh Nazari, Issa Hekmati, Sara Farhang
Introduction: Available treatments for hot flashes in patients with breast cancer are not always tolerable or effective for all patients.
Methods: Patients diagnosed to have primary breast cancer were randomly allocated to receive 10mg of escitalopram, placebo, or progressive muscle relaxation therapy. Patients were asked to report the frequency and duration of hot flashes during day and night, at baseline and after ten weeks of treatment, and completed the menopause rating scale.
Results: Eighty-two patients were randomly assigned to receive escitalopram (n=26), PMRT (n=28), and placebo (n=28). PMRT and escitalopram could effectively decrease number and duration of diurnal and nocturnal HFs in patients with breast cancer, with a better effect observed from escitalopram. They could both decrease the total score of MRS.
Conclusion: Both escitalopram ad PMRT can reveal nocturnal and diurnal HFs in terms of frequency and duration in patients with breast cancer.
{"title":"Escitalopram and progressive muscle relaxation training are both effective for the treatment of hot flashes in patients with breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Maryam Shirzadi, Negin Farshchian, Arash Nazarpour, Soudabeh Eskandari, Fahimeh Kahrari, Hamed Abdollahpour Ranjbar, Somayeh Nazari, Issa Hekmati, Sara Farhang","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2021.1985452","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2021.1985452","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Available treatments for hot flashes in patients with breast cancer are not always tolerable or effective for all patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed to have primary breast cancer were randomly allocated to receive 10<b> </b>mg of escitalopram, placebo, or progressive muscle relaxation therapy. Patients were asked to report the frequency and duration of hot flashes during day and night, at baseline and after ten weeks of treatment, and completed the menopause rating scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two patients were randomly assigned to receive escitalopram (<i>n</i><b> </b>=<b> </b>26), PMRT (<i>n</i><b> </b>=<b> </b>28), and placebo (<i>n</i><b> </b>=<b> </b>28). PMRT and escitalopram could effectively decrease number and duration of diurnal and nocturnal HFs in patients with breast cancer, with a better effect observed from escitalopram. They could both decrease the total score of MRS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both escitalopram ad PMRT can reveal nocturnal and diurnal HFs in terms of frequency and duration in patients with breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"43 4","pages":"393-399"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10432357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To test the validity and reliability of the Chichewa Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ) in Malawian postpartum women.
Methods: A cross-sectional study of postnatal women (N= 415) at 1 day after vaginal birth was conducted at a district hospital in Malawi. The W-DEQ, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale were used to measure fear of birth (FOB), depressive symptoms and quality of life (QoL). Principal component analysis (PCA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha, the average variance extracted (AVE) and the composite reliability (CR) and Pearson correlation were used to test the construct validity, reliability, convergent and divergent validity of the Chichewa W-DEQ (CW-DEQ).
Results: The participants had a mean age of 28.3 ± 6.7 years. A multidimensional structure containing three factors - a lack of positive feelings, fear and concerns about childbirth - with an appropriate model fit was reported for the CW-DEQ version. The Cronbach's α of the CW-DEQ was 0.87. The AVE and CR values were highly acceptable in lack of positive feelings - 0.17 (0.68), and concerns about childbirth - 0.79 (0.88) factors which proved the convergent validity of each; however, was marginally acceptable in the fear factor - 0.14 (0.53). Low range of correlations between the CW-DEQ constructs (r = 0.27 ∼ 0.42, p < .001), confirmed the divergent validity.
Conclusions: In this study, we found the CW-DEQ to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing FOB in postpartum women.
{"title":"The Chichewa Wijma delivery expectancy/experience questionnaire: a factor analytic study for postpartum women in Malawi.","authors":"Madalitso Khwepeya, Roselyn Chipojola, Kaboni Whitney Gondwe, Hui-Chuan Huang, Shu-Yu Kuo","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2022.2126309","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2022.2126309","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the validity and reliability of the Chichewa Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ) in Malawian postpartum women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study of postnatal women (<i>N</i>= 415) at 1 day after vaginal birth was conducted at a district hospital in Malawi. The W-DEQ, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale were used to measure fear of birth (FOB), depressive symptoms and quality of life (QoL). Principal component analysis (PCA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha, the average variance extracted (AVE) and the composite reliability (CR) and Pearson correlation were used to test the construct validity, reliability, convergent and divergent validity of the Chichewa W-DEQ (CW-DEQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants had a mean age of 28.3 ± 6.7 years. A multidimensional structure containing three factors - a lack of positive feelings, fear and concerns about childbirth - with an appropriate model fit was reported for the CW-DEQ version. The Cronbach's α of the CW-DEQ was 0.87. The AVE and CR values were highly acceptable in lack of positive feelings - 0.17 (0.68), and concerns about childbirth - 0.79 (0.88) factors which proved the convergent validity of each; however, was marginally acceptable in the fear factor - 0.14 (0.53). Low range of correlations between the CW-DEQ constructs (<i>r</i> = 0.27 ∼ 0.42, <i>p</i> < .001), confirmed the divergent validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we found the CW-DEQ to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing FOB in postpartum women.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"43 4","pages":"593-600"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10424930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/0167482X.2022.2066517
Seda Akgün Kavurmaci, İsmet Hortu, Orkun Ilgen, Ayşegül Gülbahar
Background: Maternal death, fetal death and suicidal attack (SA), each one of these topics are an important public health problem. A suicide attack attempt during pregnancy includes all these important issues together and requires additional attention. Some factors may show regional differences such as suicidal method, distribution of attempts according to the gestational week and the most common preferred drugs. The predetermination of these variables may allow taking preventive measures and advantages can be gains on maternal-fetal health.
Methods: The data of pregnant women who were admitted to 3 different university hospital emergency departments in same city between 2015 and 2020 after a SA was investigated. SAs features and distribution of attacks based on variables such as age, gravidity and gestational week etc. was recorded. In addition, obstetric/non-obstetric injuries and pregnancy outcomes was also analyzed.
Results: The mean age of 78 cases was 26.9 ± 6.4 (17-44) years. SAs were detected most frequently in the 1st trimester (42.3%) and at least in the 3rd trimester (20.5%). The most preferred SA method (89.7%) was high-dose drug intake. The most commonly preferred drugs were paracetamol, iron/folic acid replacement therapy drugs and antidepressants.
Conclusions: Pregnant women are at risk of SA, especially in the first trimester. Contrary to popular belief, 75% of pregnant women who have SA do not have a known psychiatric disease diagnosis before. Therefore, psychiatric evaluation should be a part of routine pregnancy follow-up examination, especially in the first trimester. In this way, pregnant women which have increased risk factors for SA such as alcohol addiction, unwanted pregnancy, and depressive mood can be detected early. In this special patient group, the most commonly SA method is high-dose drug intake. Knowing the high dose treatments for frequently used drugs such as paracetamol by emergency physicians and obstetricians, educating medical staff about treatments can save additional time for mother and fetus and can be a life saver approach.
{"title":"Characteristics of suicidal attacks in pregnancy; a multicenter study.","authors":"Seda Akgün Kavurmaci, İsmet Hortu, Orkun Ilgen, Ayşegül Gülbahar","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2022.2066517","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2022.2066517","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal death, fetal death and suicidal attack (SA), each one of these topics are an important public health problem. A suicide attack attempt during pregnancy includes all these important issues together and requires additional attention. Some factors may show regional differences such as suicidal method, distribution of attempts according to the gestational week and the most common preferred drugs. The predetermination of these variables may allow taking preventive measures and advantages can be gains on maternal-fetal health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data of pregnant women who were admitted to 3 different university hospital emergency departments in same city between 2015 and 2020 after a SA was investigated. SAs features and distribution of attacks based on variables such as age, gravidity and gestational week etc. was recorded. In addition, obstetric/non-obstetric injuries and pregnancy outcomes was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of 78 cases was 26.9 ± 6.4 (17-44) years. SAs were detected most frequently in the 1st trimester (42.3%) and at least in the 3rd trimester (20.5%). The most preferred SA method (89.7%) was high-dose drug intake. The most commonly preferred drugs were paracetamol, iron/folic acid replacement therapy drugs and antidepressants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pregnant women are at risk of SA, especially in the first trimester. Contrary to popular belief, 75% of pregnant women who have SA do not have a known psychiatric disease diagnosis before. Therefore, psychiatric evaluation should be a part of routine pregnancy follow-up examination, especially in the first trimester. In this way, pregnant women which have increased risk factors for SA such as alcohol addiction, unwanted pregnancy, and depressive mood can be detected early. In this special patient group, the most commonly SA method is high-dose drug intake. Knowing the high dose treatments for frequently used drugs such as paracetamol by emergency physicians and obstetricians, educating medical staff about treatments can save additional time for mother and fetus and can be a life saver approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"43 4","pages":"474-481"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10433177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/0167482X.2022.2101446
Julia C Daugherty, Natalia Bueso-Izquierdo, Sandraluz Lara-Cinisomo, Alvaro Lozano-Ruiz, Rafael A Caparros-Gonzalez
Introduction: Pregnancy has been associated with diminished maternal mental health and a deterioration in partner relationship quality. The recent COVID-19 quarantine measures have created additional stressors for pregnant women due to isolation and a surge in partner conflict.Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess how partner relationship conflict and social support may mediate mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 lockdown.Methods: A cross-sectional study with a sample of 152 pregnant women using psychological measures, (i.e. Prenatal Distress Questionnaire, Symptom Checklist-90-R, Duke-UNC-11 Functional Social Support Questionnaire, Perceived Stress Scale). Demographic characteristics, obstetrics history, and partner relationship conflict were assessed using questionnaires.Results: While there were few reports of physical violence in this sample, between 18% and 59% of women reported partner relationship conflict on the psychological subscale (e.g. afraid of one's partner or screamed at by one's partner). Further, the psychological subscale was significantly associated with symptoms of psychopathology. There was a significant negative association between social support and pregnancy-specific stress (p = .005), and perceived stress (p= .038).Conclusions: These findings suggest that partner relationship conflict and social support may act as important buffers for prenatal mental health in childbearing women during vulnerable situations, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
{"title":"Partner relationship quality, social support and maternal stress during pregnancy and the first COVID-19 lockdown.","authors":"Julia C Daugherty, Natalia Bueso-Izquierdo, Sandraluz Lara-Cinisomo, Alvaro Lozano-Ruiz, Rafael A Caparros-Gonzalez","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2022.2101446","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2022.2101446","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Pregnancy has been associated with diminished maternal mental health and a deterioration in partner relationship quality. The recent COVID-19 quarantine measures have created additional stressors for pregnant women due to isolation and a surge in partner conflict.<b>Objective:</b> The purpose of this study was to assess how partner relationship conflict and social support may mediate mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 lockdown.<b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional study with a sample of 152 pregnant women using psychological measures, (i.e. Prenatal Distress Questionnaire, Symptom Checklist-90-R, Duke-UNC-11 Functional Social Support Questionnaire, Perceived Stress Scale). Demographic characteristics, obstetrics history, and partner relationship conflict were assessed using questionnaires.<b>Results:</b> While there were few reports of physical violence in this sample, between 18% and 59% of women reported partner relationship conflict on the psychological subscale (e.g. afraid of one's partner or screamed at by one's partner). Further, the psychological subscale was significantly associated with symptoms of psychopathology. There was a significant negative association between social support and pregnancy-specific stress (p = .005), and perceived stress (p= .038).<b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that partner relationship conflict and social support may act as important buffers for prenatal mental health in childbearing women during vulnerable situations, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"43 4","pages":"563-573"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10781111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the association between pre-pregnancy menstrual cycle characteristics (i.e. cycle-length variability and cycle length) and antenatal depression.
Methods: This study retrieved the data from the baseline survey of the randomized controlled trial with pregnant women at 16-20 weeks gestation who used a pregnancy tracking app. The antenatal depression was assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) at 16-20 weeks gestation, and the cutoff point of 10/11 was adopted. Pre-conceptional menstrual cycle information was obtained via a prerecorded period tracking app. Cycle-length variability was defined as the average difference in the lengths between cycles, dichotomized into regular (≤6 days) and irregular (>6 days). Cycle length was coded as a categorical variable: <25 days, 25-26 days, 27-29 days (regular), 30-31 days, 32-33 days, and 34+ days. The associations of cycle disorders with EPDS scores were examined using regression analysis and a multiple logistic regression model adjusted for covariates.
Results: The total of 3473 participants were analyzed in this study. Irregular cycle variability (>6 days) was significantly associated with high EPDS scores (adjusted: standardized beta = 0.049, p = 0.003) and with high cutoff EPDS scores (over 11) (adjusted OR = 1.40 [1.02-1.94], p = 0.038) but not with cycle length.
Conclusion: Irregular menstrual cycle before pregnancy was associated with depression during pregnancy. The health of the menstrual cycle during preconception needs to be further explored to promote healthy maternal mental health.
目的:本研究旨在评估孕前月经周期特征(即周期长度变异性和周期长度)与产前抑郁之间的关系。方法:本研究检索使用妊娠跟踪应用程序的16-20周妊娠妇女随机对照试验基线调查数据,采用妊娠16-20周爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)对产前抑郁进行评估,截止点为10/11。通过预先记录的月经跟踪应用程序获得孕前月经周期信息。周期长度变异性定义为周期之间长度的平均差异,分为规律(≤6天)和不规则(>6天)。周期长度编码为分类变量:结果:本研究共分析了3473名参与者。不规则周期变异性(>6天)与高EPDS评分(调整后:标准化beta值= 0.049,p = 0.003)和高EPDS评分(超过11)(调整OR = 1.40 [1.02-1.94], p = 0.038)显著相关,但与周期长度无关。结论:孕前月经周期不规律与孕期抑郁有关。孕前期月经周期健康状况有待进一步探讨,以促进孕产妇心理健康。
{"title":"Preconception menstrual cycle disorder and antenatal depression: a cross-sectional study with prerecorded information.","authors":"Natsu Sasaki, Hiroto Akiyama, Norito Kawakami, Daisuke Nishi","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2021.2010699","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2021.2010699","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the association between pre-pregnancy menstrual cycle characteristics (i.e. cycle-length variability and cycle length) and antenatal depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrieved the data from the baseline survey of the randomized controlled trial with pregnant women at 16-20 weeks gestation who used a pregnancy tracking app. The antenatal depression was assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) at 16-20 weeks gestation, and the cutoff point of 10/11 was adopted. Pre-conceptional menstrual cycle information was obtained <i>via</i> a prerecorded period tracking app. Cycle-length variability was defined as the average difference in the lengths between cycles, dichotomized into regular (≤6 days) and irregular (>6 days). Cycle length was coded as a categorical variable: <25 days, 25-26 days, 27-29 days (regular), 30-31 days, 32-33 days, and 34+ days. The associations of cycle disorders with EPDS scores were examined using regression analysis and a multiple logistic regression model adjusted for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total of 3473 participants were analyzed in this study. Irregular cycle variability (>6 days) was significantly associated with high EPDS scores (adjusted: standardized beta = 0.049, <i>p</i> = 0.003) and with high cutoff EPDS scores (over 11) (adjusted OR = 1.40 [1.02-1.94], <i>p</i> = 0.038) but not with cycle length.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Irregular menstrual cycle before pregnancy was associated with depression during pregnancy. The health of the menstrual cycle during preconception needs to be further explored to promote healthy maternal mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"43 4","pages":"411-418"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10798089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/0167482X.2022.2050210
Alejandro Irvin Soto Briseño, Rita A Gomez-Diaz, Ricardo Cesar Saldaña Espinoza, Pilar Lavielle, Adriana Leticia Valdez González, Niels H Wacher
Purpose: The COVID-19 Fear Scale (FCV-19S) allows screening in general population; however, there is no specific instrument in our population for screening in the perinatal period that considers fear related with COVID-19 and offspring well-being. We aimed to validate the FCV-19S modified for application during the perinatal period.
Materials and methods: Analytical, cross-sectional design. After signing consent, women 18-45 years were included. Internal consistency was calculated with Cronbach's alpha, external validity using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), factorial analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient for re-test.
Results: The sample included 178 women, mean age 31.04 ± 5.9. We obtained internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha = 0.873 (95%CI, 0.842-0.899). Spearman's Rho coefficient was 0.207 (p= .013). All the elements were statistically significant for the polychoric correlation (p<.001). Reliability test-retest with intraclass correlation was 0.873.
Conclusions: The version of FCV-19S modified with eight items is a valid measurement instrument for application during the perinatal period, showing adequate internal consistency and external validity with HADS as measure of concurrence to identify anxiety related with COVID-19 during the perinatal period.
{"title":"Validation of the COVID-19 Fear Scale modified for application during the perinatal period.","authors":"Alejandro Irvin Soto Briseño, Rita A Gomez-Diaz, Ricardo Cesar Saldaña Espinoza, Pilar Lavielle, Adriana Leticia Valdez González, Niels H Wacher","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2022.2050210","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2022.2050210","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The COVID-19 Fear Scale (FCV-19S) allows screening in general population; however, there is no specific instrument in our population for screening in the perinatal period that considers fear related with COVID-19 and offspring well-being. We aimed to validate the FCV-19S modified for application during the perinatal period.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Analytical, cross-sectional design. After signing consent, women 18-45 years were included. Internal consistency was calculated with Cronbach's alpha, external validity using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), factorial analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient for re-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 178 women, mean age 31.04 ± 5.9. We obtained internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha = 0.873 (95%CI, 0.842-0.899). Spearman's Rho coefficient was 0.207 (<i>p</i>= .013). All the elements were statistically significant for the polychoric correlation (<i>p</i><.001). Reliability test-retest with intraclass correlation was 0.873.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The version of FCV-19S modified with eight items is a valid measurement instrument for application during the perinatal period, showing adequate internal consistency and external validity with HADS as measure of concurrence to identify anxiety related with COVID-19 during the perinatal period.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"43 4","pages":"447-452"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10423859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/0167482X.2022.2097475
Nicola Payne, Olga van den Akker
Purpose: This study examined experiences during the cessation of fertility treatment due to the COVID-19 pandemic, including levels of mental health, coping strategies used to manage uncertainty about treatment due to the pandemic, sources of support, and predictors of mental health.
Methods: One hundred and seventy-five participants in the UK completed an online survey.
Results: Half of the participants experienced clinical levels of anxiety and/or depression, and 20% reported suicidal feelings as a result of the uncertainty about treatment due to the pandemic. Support from friends, family and online forums were reported by more than half of participants, but support from fertility clinics or counsellors were reported by less than one quarter. The strategy used most frequently to cope with the uncertainty about treatment due to the pandemic was self-distraction, and this predicted reduced depression. However, self-blame, behavioral disengagement and venting predicted increased depression and self-blame, behavioral disengagement, and denial predicted increased anxiety.
Conclusions: Fertility clinic communication and psychological support, such as counselling, which had substantially reduced during treatment cessation, could include some focus on personal coping, including what to avoid. Psychological support is likely to be more important now than ever. Despite resumption of treatment, the impacts of the period of cessation and of COVID-19 are likely to continue to reverberate.
{"title":"Mental health and coping with fertility treatment cessation during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.","authors":"Nicola Payne, Olga van den Akker","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2022.2097475","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2022.2097475","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined experiences during the cessation of fertility treatment due to the COVID-19 pandemic, including levels of mental health, coping strategies used to manage uncertainty about treatment due to the pandemic, sources of support, and predictors of mental health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and seventy-five participants in the UK completed an online survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Half of the participants experienced clinical levels of anxiety and/or depression, and 20% reported suicidal feelings as a result of the uncertainty about treatment due to the pandemic. Support from friends, family and online forums were reported by more than half of participants, but support from fertility clinics or counsellors were reported by less than one quarter. The strategy used most frequently to cope with the uncertainty about treatment due to the pandemic was self-distraction, and this predicted reduced depression. However, self-blame, behavioral disengagement and venting predicted increased depression and self-blame, behavioral disengagement, and denial predicted increased anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fertility clinic communication and psychological support, such as counselling, which had substantially reduced during treatment cessation, could include some focus on personal coping, including what to avoid. Psychological support is likely to be more important now than ever. Despite resumption of treatment, the impacts of the period of cessation and of COVID-19 are likely to continue to reverberate.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"43 4","pages":"550-556"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10433226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/0167482X.2022.2052845
Lu Liu, Dong Roman Xu, Yongsheng Tong, Jingcheng Shi, Zhen Zeng, Wenjie Gong
Purpose: To compare the characteristics of depression-related symptoms identified by individual EPDS items in women who screened positive and negative, and to describe the occurrence of thoughts of self-harm in these women.
Methods: Based on a Chinese cohort of 1,112 women, scores on each EPDS item were analyzed at 7 time points from the first trimester to 6 weeks postpartum. Scores greater than 0 indicated the presence of symptoms, and higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. We defined the most frequent, serious and important symptoms for screening-positive and screening-negative groups as the item with the highest proportion of respondents scoring 1 or higher, highest proportion scoring 3, and highest average score, respectively.
Results: In screened positive women the most frequent symptom was feeling sad or miserable, and the most serious and important symptoms were both sleeping problems. Among those screened negative, self-blame was the most frequent, serious and important item. For women who screened positive in the first trimester, only self-blame and feeling overwhelmed showed stability over time. Symptoms in women screened negative were relatively stable. Four in ten women who had self-harm thoughts were screened negative.
Conclusion: Women who screened positive in EPDS differed from those screened negative in the characteristics in depressive symptoms. Intervention strategies focusing on the most frequent, serious and important symptoms (such as sadness and insomnia) may be worthwhile. Health practitioners should be trained to respond to a positive response to thoughts of self-harm, regardless of whether the women are screened positive or negative.
{"title":"Symptomatology in 1,112 women screened positive and negative using the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS): longitudinal observations from the first trimester to 6 weeks postpartum of a Chinese cohort.","authors":"Lu Liu, Dong Roman Xu, Yongsheng Tong, Jingcheng Shi, Zhen Zeng, Wenjie Gong","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2022.2052845","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2022.2052845","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the characteristics of depression-related symptoms identified by individual EPDS items in women who screened positive and negative, and to describe the occurrence of thoughts of self-harm in these women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on a Chinese cohort of 1,112 women, scores on each EPDS item were analyzed at 7 time points from the first trimester to 6 weeks postpartum. Scores greater than 0 indicated the presence of symptoms, and higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. We defined the most frequent, serious and important symptoms for screening-positive and screening-negative groups as the item with the highest proportion of respondents scoring 1 or higher, highest proportion scoring 3, and highest average score, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In screened positive women the most frequent symptom was feeling sad or miserable, and the most serious and important symptoms were both sleeping problems. Among those screened negative, self-blame was the most frequent, serious and important item. For women who screened positive in the first trimester, only self-blame and feeling overwhelmed showed stability over time. Symptoms in women screened negative were relatively stable. Four in ten women who had self-harm thoughts were screened negative.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women who screened positive in EPDS differed from those screened negative in the characteristics in depressive symptoms. Intervention strategies focusing on the most frequent, serious and important symptoms (such as sadness and insomnia) may be worthwhile. Health practitioners should be trained to respond to a positive response to thoughts of self-harm, regardless of whether the women are screened positive or negative.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"43 4","pages":"453-463"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10798582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/0167482X.2022.2089555
Sofia Hallström, Hanna Grundström, Anna Malmquist, Matilda Eklind, Katri Nieminen
Background: Most studies of fear of childbirth (FOC) are conducted on heterosexual cisgender pregnant populations of birth-giving parents. Among lesbian and bisexual women, as well as transgender and queer people (LBTQ), minority stress can add an extra layer to FOC. Gender binary and cisnormative assumptions leave it to the patient to educate and navigate healthcare providers, which can increase mental health problems.Objective: The aim of this study is to compare FOC and mental illness among expecting birth-giving parents and their partners in an LBTQ population.Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 80 self-identified pregnant LBTQ persons and their 54 non-pregnant partners at a LBTQ specialized antenatal clinic in a large Swedish city of over one million inhabitants. The survey included socio-demographic characteristics, sexual and gender orientation, obstetric history, previous mental health, previous trauma exposure and measures of FOC and mental health.Results: Levels of FOC were significantly higher for the pregnant participants (median W-DEQ 67.5) than for partners (median W-DEQ 60.0). The proportion of severe FOC was higher for pregnant participants (20.3%) than for partners (9.4%), although this difference was not statistically significant. Mental illness was significantly associated with FOC.Conclusion: The results add valuable information to our understanding of the specific needs of pregnant LBTQ people and their partners and may help us to develop healthcare in the future.
{"title":"Fear of childbirth and mental health among lesbian, bisexual, transgender and queer people: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Sofia Hallström, Hanna Grundström, Anna Malmquist, Matilda Eklind, Katri Nieminen","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2022.2089555","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2022.2089555","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Most studies of fear of childbirth (FOC) are conducted on heterosexual cisgender pregnant populations of birth-giving parents. Among lesbian and bisexual women, as well as transgender and queer people (LBTQ), minority stress can add an extra layer to FOC. Gender binary and cisnormative assumptions leave it to the patient to educate and navigate healthcare providers, which can increase mental health problems.<b>Objective:</b> The aim of this study is to compare FOC and mental illness among expecting birth-giving parents and their partners in an LBTQ population.<b>Materials and methods:</b> This cross-sectional study recruited 80 self-identified pregnant LBTQ persons and their 54 non-pregnant partners at a LBTQ specialized antenatal clinic in a large Swedish city of over one million inhabitants. The survey included socio-demographic characteristics, sexual and gender orientation, obstetric history, previous mental health, previous trauma exposure and measures of FOC and mental health.<b>Results:</b> Levels of FOC were significantly higher for the pregnant participants (median W-DEQ 67.5) than for partners (median W-DEQ 60.0). The proportion of severe FOC was higher for pregnant participants (20.3%) than for partners (9.4%), although this difference was not statistically significant. Mental illness was significantly associated with FOC.<b>Conclusion:</b> The results add valuable information to our understanding of the specific needs of pregnant LBTQ people and their partners and may help us to develop healthcare in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"43 4","pages":"526-531"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10798614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}