Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is an established microsurgical approach for secondary lymphedema; however, the optimal recipient site remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes between different recipient sites in upper and lower extremity VLNT. Following the PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect were searched to October 2024. Outcomes assessed included circumferential reduction rate (CRR), volume-based reduction, cellulitis incidence, and quality of life. Meta-analysis was performed using the generic inverse-variance method with random effects. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2, and sensitivity and meta-regression analysis explored potential sources of variability. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was feasible only for distal inset data due to substantial heterogeneity among proximal and middle sites. Distal inset demonstrated the highest pooled CRR (42.2% for upper extremity and 42.5% for lower extremity), though heterogeneity remained high (I2 = 84–91%). Distal placement also showed reduced cellulitis incidence and improved quality of life scores. While distal inset placement yielded the greatest circumferential reduction, outcomes varied widely across studies. No single recipient site was universally superior, optimal selection should be tailored to disease stage, edema distribution, and tissue condition.
{"title":"Recipient site selection in vascularized lymph node transfer for secondary lymphedema: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Mohamad Rachadian Ramadan , Patricia Angelin , Parintosa Atmodiwirjo","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is an established microsurgical approach for secondary lymphedema; however, the optimal recipient site remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes between different recipient sites in upper and lower extremity VLNT. Following the PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect were searched to October 2024. Outcomes assessed included circumferential reduction rate (CRR), volume-based reduction, cellulitis incidence, and quality of life. Meta-analysis was performed using the generic inverse-variance method with random effects. Heterogeneity was assessed using I<sup>2</sup>, and sensitivity and meta-regression analysis explored potential sources of variability. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was feasible only for distal inset data due to substantial heterogeneity among proximal and middle sites. Distal inset demonstrated the highest pooled CRR (42.2% for upper extremity and 42.5% for lower extremity), though heterogeneity remained high (I<sup>2</sup> = 84–91%). Distal placement also showed reduced cellulitis incidence and improved quality of life scores. While distal inset placement yielded the greatest circumferential reduction, outcomes varied widely across studies. No single recipient site was universally superior, optimal selection should be tailored to disease stage, edema distribution, and tissue condition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 160-171"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146080623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.006
Ziyue Lin , Jian Yin
Background
The choice of modality for immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains controversial. We compared the complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction between two IBR techniques, immediate autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) and implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR), in patients treated with NAT, with the goal of informing clinical practice.
Methods
Data from patients who underwent unilateral IBR after receiving NAT were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, tumour profiles, treatment regimens, complication data, patient-reported outcomes, and aesthetic scores were compared between the groups. Subgroup analyses were also conducted separately for each group.
Results
Of 172 patients who were included in the study, 97 underwent IBBR and 75 underwent ABR. Reconstruction failures (18.6% vs. 1.3%, p<0.001) and infection (13.4% vs. 4.0%, p=0.035) occurred more frequently in the IBBR than in the ABR group. Multivariable regression analysis showed that diabetes significantly increased reconstruction failure risk in the IBBR group (OR=16.14, 95% CI: 1.46–178.51, p=0.023), with infection also emerging as a notable risk factor (OR=5.26, 95% CI: 1.43–19.38, p=0.013). The IBBR group demonstrated significantly lower patient satisfaction scores compared to ABR patients (65.52±19.50 vs. 72.22±18.26, p=0.035). Aesthetic outcomes were analyzed by reconstruction stage, with significantly fewer people reporting “excellent” in the IBBR group than in the ABR group at the tissue expander phase (TEP) (65.6% vs. 89.5%, p=0.002).
Conclusion
Following NAT, fewer complications, higher patient satisfaction, and better aesthetic outcomes were observed with ABR compared to IBBR.
{"title":"Outcomes of immediate implant-based vs. autologous breast reconstruction after neoadjuvant therapy","authors":"Ziyue Lin , Jian Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The choice of modality for immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains controversial. We compared the complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction between two IBR techniques, immediate autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) and implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR), in patients treated with NAT, with the goal of informing clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from patients who underwent unilateral IBR after receiving NAT were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, tumour profiles, treatment regimens, complication data, patient-reported outcomes, and aesthetic scores were compared between the groups. Subgroup analyses were also conducted separately for each group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 172 patients who were included in the study, 97 underwent IBBR and 75 underwent ABR. Reconstruction failures (18.6% vs. 1.3%, p<0.001) and infection (13.4% vs. 4.0%, p=0.035) occurred more frequently in the IBBR than in the ABR group. Multivariable regression analysis showed that diabetes significantly increased reconstruction failure risk in the IBBR group (OR=16.14, 95% CI: 1.46–178.51, p=0.023), with infection also emerging as a notable risk factor (OR=5.26, 95% CI: 1.43–19.38, p=0.013). The IBBR group demonstrated significantly lower patient satisfaction scores compared to ABR patients (65.52±19.50 vs. 72.22±18.26, p=0.035). Aesthetic outcomes were analyzed by reconstruction stage, with significantly fewer people reporting “excellent” in the IBBR group than in the ABR group at the tissue expander phase (TEP) (65.6% vs. 89.5%, p=0.002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Following NAT, fewer complications, higher patient satisfaction, and better aesthetic outcomes were observed with ABR compared to IBBR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 135-143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146080624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.019
Suleyman Yildizdal , Etkin Boynuyogun , Sinan Kadir Altunal , Berkay Kose , Ugur Koçer , Ibrahim Vargel
Background
Frontonasal dysplasia (FND) is a rare craniofacial anomaly characterized by hypertelorism and nasal deformities. Traditional intracranial approaches for correction, such as box osteotomy or facial bipartition, are effective but associated with high morbidity. This study presents an extracranial umbrella graft technique for nasal reconstruction in patients with FND.
Methods
Between 2014 and 2024, 55 patients with FND were retrospectively evaluated, and 14 met the criteria for extracranial nasal reconstruction. Inclusion criteria were interorbital distance (IOD) <40 mm and the presence of inwardly projecting concave nasal cartilage. Through a midline incision, inverted U-shaped osteotomies were performed to medialize nasal bones. Concave cartilage was harvested, inverted, and used as an umbrella graft to restore nasal projection. Septal cartilage grafts supported the lower nasal framework. Outcomes were assessed by complications and Whitaker classification.
Results
This study included 9 females and 5 males (mean age 8.3 years). Mean follow-up was 2.3 years. No major complications, such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage, visual impairment, or infection, were observed. One patient developed pressure sores from splints, and two underwent minor scar revisions. Mean anterior IOD decreased from 34 to 26.9 mm. Three patients reported insufficient projection, whereas all others achieved significant improvement. According to Whitaker classification, 10 patients were category I and 4 were category II.
Conclusion
This technique offers a safe, less invasive alternative for nasal reconstruction in selected patients with FND, providing satisfactory esthetic results with minimal morbidity. Although long-term outcomes remain to be clarified, this approach may serve as a valuable option.
{"title":"A novel umbrella graft approach in nasal reconstruction of patients with frontonasal dysplasia","authors":"Suleyman Yildizdal , Etkin Boynuyogun , Sinan Kadir Altunal , Berkay Kose , Ugur Koçer , Ibrahim Vargel","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.019","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Frontonasal dysplasia (FND) is a rare craniofacial anomaly characterized by hypertelorism and nasal deformities. Traditional intracranial approaches for correction, such as box osteotomy or facial bipartition, are effective but associated with high morbidity. This study presents an extracranial umbrella graft technique for nasal reconstruction in patients with FND.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between 2014 and 2024, 55 patients with FND were retrospectively evaluated, and 14 met the criteria for extracranial nasal reconstruction. Inclusion criteria were interorbital distance (IOD) <40 mm and the presence of inwardly projecting concave nasal cartilage. Through a midline incision, inverted U-shaped osteotomies were performed to medialize nasal bones. Concave cartilage was harvested, inverted, and used as an umbrella graft to restore nasal projection. Septal cartilage grafts supported the lower nasal framework. Outcomes were assessed by complications and Whitaker classification.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study included 9 females and 5 males (mean age 8.3 years). Mean follow-up was 2.3 years. No major complications, such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage, visual impairment, or infection, were observed. One patient developed pressure sores from splints, and two underwent minor scar revisions. Mean anterior IOD decreased from 34 to 26.9 mm. Three patients reported insufficient projection, whereas all others achieved significant improvement. According to Whitaker classification, 10 patients were category I and 4 were category II.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This technique offers a safe, less invasive alternative for nasal reconstruction in selected patients with FND, providing satisfactory esthetic results with minimal morbidity. Although long-term outcomes remain to be clarified, this approach may serve as a valuable option.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 205-211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146128076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-15DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.008
Jiachao Xiong , Yingshen Shi , Zhe Liu, Ni Zhuang, Hua Jiang, Yuxin Qian, Rong Guo
Background
The modified first-stage autologous ear reconstruction for patients with microtia has been part of our regular practice since 2020, with long-term follow-up revealing no thoracic complications in the patients. Our previous clinical studies systematically investigated and advocated for the critical role of preserving the intact costal cartilage membrane and its precise suturing.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study focused on primary reconstruction for congenital microtia. Patients were screened based on exclusion and inclusion criteria. Data on patient demographics and three-dimensional CT reconstructions of the costal cartilage were collected. Additionally, in vivo animal experiments were conducted to assess the characteristics of the regenerated tissue within the perichondrium.
Results
A total of 161 ear reconstructions performed for patients with microtia were included, comprising 54 cases on the left side, 102 cases on the right side, and 5 cases on both sides. We found that suturing the preserved costal cartilage membrane in place maintained its native contour and trajectory. A direct relationship was found between advancing age, higher physical quality, and superior costal cartilage regeneration among patients undergoing the modified first-stage autologous ear reconstruction. Patients older than 10 years demonstrated a high proportion of tissue regeneration and good postoperative thoracic stability at an early stage. Furthermore, animal models revealed regenerated costal cartilage at the perichondrial suture sites in rabbits 6 months postoperatively.
Conclusions
We conducted long-term follow-up on patients who underwent the modified first-stage ear reconstruction and they showed no thoracic complications. It emphasized the critical importance of obtaining costal cartilage, preferably in patients 10 years of age and older, and preserving and suturing the intact costal cartilage membrane during the modified two-flap method. These findings provide theoretical support for clinically adopting this technique.
{"title":"Costal cartilage tissue regeneration after the modified first-stage autologous ear reconstruction for microtia: A retrospective study","authors":"Jiachao Xiong , Yingshen Shi , Zhe Liu, Ni Zhuang, Hua Jiang, Yuxin Qian, Rong Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The modified first-stage autologous ear reconstruction for patients with microtia has been part of our regular practice since 2020, with long-term follow-up revealing no thoracic complications in the patients. Our previous clinical studies systematically investigated and advocated for the critical role of preserving the intact costal cartilage membrane and its precise suturing.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study focused on primary reconstruction for congenital microtia. Patients were screened based on exclusion and inclusion criteria. Data on patient demographics and three-dimensional CT reconstructions of the costal cartilage were collected. Additionally, in vivo animal experiments were conducted to assess the characteristics of the regenerated tissue within the perichondrium.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 161 ear reconstructions performed for patients with microtia were included, comprising 54 cases on the left side, 102 cases on the right side, and 5 cases on both sides. We found that suturing the preserved costal cartilage membrane in place maintained its native contour and trajectory. A direct relationship was found between advancing age, higher physical quality, and superior costal cartilage regeneration among patients undergoing the modified first-stage autologous ear reconstruction. Patients older than 10 years demonstrated a high proportion of tissue regeneration and good postoperative thoracic stability at an early stage. Furthermore, animal models revealed regenerated costal cartilage at the perichondrial suture sites in rabbits 6 months postoperatively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We conducted long-term follow-up on patients who underwent the modified first-stage ear reconstruction and they showed no thoracic complications. It emphasized the critical importance of obtaining costal cartilage, preferably in patients 10 years of age and older, and preserving and suturing the intact costal cartilage membrane during the modified two-flap method. These findings provide theoretical support for clinically adopting this technique.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 127-134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146080626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-16DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.013
Madhu Periasamy, Vamseedharan Muthukumar, Hari Venkatramani, S. Raja Sabapathy
{"title":"Audit and technical modifications of scout vein graft technique","authors":"Madhu Periasamy, Vamseedharan Muthukumar, Hari Venkatramani, S. Raja Sabapathy","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 55-57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146032363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.020
Tiago Rodrigues-Guimarães , Ricardo Horta , Mário Marques-Vieira , José Andrade , João Rocha-Neves
Background
Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are a consequence of chronic venous insufficiency, resulting in prolonged healing, high recurrence rates, and substantial economic burden. Traditional treatments, including compression therapy and wound care management, often lead to slow and incomplete healing. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a potential therapy for enhancing wound healing, though its effectiveness remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed PRP’s impact on wound healing in VLUs compared to conventional treatments.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed and Web of Science databases and 13 studies with a total of 554 patients were included. Healing outcomes, including complete and partial ulcer healing rates, were analyzed using binary random-effects models. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed using tau2, Q-tests, and I2 statistics.
Results
Meta-analysis demonstrated that PRP treatment was associated with a 1.5-fold higher odds of complete wound healing compared with conventional treatments (95% CI 1.09–2.07) (I2 = 58%). Ulcer area reduction was higher in the PRP group (OR: 16.37 [95% CI 6.45–26.28], I2 = 97%). Complete healing at the fourth week showed a meta-analytical OR 3.65 [1.08–12.32] with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 61%, p < 0.001). Meta-regression revealed a significant positive association between age and treatment effect, whereas diabetes mellitus was a significant negative predictor. PRP reduced ulcer recurrence (OR: 0.25 [95% CI 0.06–0.99], p < 0.001) with low heterogeneity.
Conclusion
PRP was associated with improved healing outcomes in VLUs and significantly enhanced wound healing. These findings suggest that PRP may enhance wound healing in venous leg ulcers and warrant further high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials to confirm its clinical applicability.
背景:下肢静脉性溃疡(VLUs)是慢性静脉功能不全的结果,导致愈合时间长,复发率高,经济负担沉重。传统的治疗方法,包括压迫疗法和伤口护理管理,往往导致缓慢和不完全愈合。富血小板血浆(PRP)是一种促进伤口愈合的潜在疗法,尽管其有效性仍存在争议。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了与常规治疗相比,PRP对vlu伤口愈合的影响。方法:系统检索PubMed和Web of Science数据库,纳入13项研究,共554例患者。愈合结果,包括溃疡完全和部分愈合率,使用二元随机效应模型进行分析。采用tau2、q检验和I2统计量评估各研究的异质性。结果:荟萃分析显示,PRP治疗与常规治疗相比,伤口完全愈合的几率高1.5倍(95% CI 1.09-2.07) (I2 = 58%)。PRP组溃疡面积减少更高(OR: 16.37 [95% CI 6.45-26.28], I2 = 97%)。第四周完全愈合的meta分析OR为3.65[1.08-12.32],具有很大的异质性(I2 = 61%, p < 0.001)。meta回归显示年龄与治疗效果呈正相关,而糖尿病是显著的负相关预测因子。PRP减少溃疡复发(OR: 0.25 [95% CI 0.06-0.99], p < 0.001),异质性低。结论:PRP可改善vlu的愈合结果并显著促进伤口愈合。这些发现表明,PRP可能会促进静脉性腿部溃疡的伤口愈合,需要进一步进行高质量、大规模的随机对照试验来证实其临床适用性。
{"title":"Meta-analysis of platelet-rich plasma for venous ulcers: Clinical efficacy and complications","authors":"Tiago Rodrigues-Guimarães , Ricardo Horta , Mário Marques-Vieira , José Andrade , João Rocha-Neves","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.020","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.020","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are a consequence of chronic venous insufficiency, resulting in prolonged healing, high recurrence rates, and substantial economic burden. Traditional treatments, including compression therapy and wound care management, often lead to slow and incomplete healing. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a potential therapy for enhancing wound healing, though its effectiveness remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed PRP’s impact on wound healing in VLUs compared to conventional treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed and Web of Science databases and 13 studies with a total of 554 patients were included. Healing outcomes, including complete and partial ulcer healing rates, were analyzed using binary random-effects models. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed using tau<sup>2</sup>, Q-tests, and I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Meta-analysis demonstrated that PRP treatment was associated with a 1.5-fold higher odds of complete wound healing compared with conventional treatments (95% CI 1.09–2.07) (I<sup>2</sup> = 58%). Ulcer area reduction was higher in the PRP group (OR: 16.37 [95% CI 6.45–26.28], I<sup>2</sup> = 97%). Complete healing at the fourth week showed a meta-analytical OR 3.65 [1.08–12.32] with substantial heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 61%, p < 0.001). Meta-regression revealed a significant positive association between age and treatment effect, whereas diabetes mellitus was a significant negative predictor. PRP reduced ulcer recurrence (OR: 0.25 [95% CI 0.06–0.99], p < 0.001) with low heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PRP was associated with improved healing outcomes in VLUs and significantly enhanced wound healing. These findings suggest that PRP may enhance wound healing in venous leg ulcers and warrant further high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials to confirm its clinical applicability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 212-224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146128098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.12.033
Zahra Ahmed , Alexander Zargaran , Olivia Kamoga , Punn Tannirandorn , Sara Sousi , David Zargaran , Norbert Kang , Afshin Mosahebi
Background
Hand trauma accounts for nearly one-third of emergency department (ED) attendances in the United Kingdom (UK). Particularly, repair of flexor tendon injuries is one of the most commonly performed plastic surgery procedures and requires months of repeated contact with hand therapy for optimal outcomes. The environmental impacts of treatment have not previously been evaluated.
Methods
A pilot retrospective service evaluation using process mapping and life-cycle assessment of 17 patients undergoing flexor tendon repair was performed using the functional unit of one completed patient pathway cycle, from ED to surgery, to rehabilitation and full recovery. Data were collected retrospectively from electronic patient records, supplier data and emission factor databases. Estimates for carbon dioxide emissions were generated in kgCO2eq., allowing us to look for specific opportunities for pathway optimisation, in line with the national guidelines.
Results
We estimated the carbon footprint of a patient undergoing flexor tendon repair to be approximately 113.2 kgCO2eq. The rehabilitation phase made the greatest contribution to emissions (59.9 kgCO2eq., 52.9%) and patient travel was responsible for 79.4% of total emissions (89.9 kgCO2eq.), followed by the production and transport of equipment (8.5 kgCO2eq., 7.5%) needed for treatment.
Conclusions
The results of this pilot eco-audit identified key emission sources and potential interventions to reduce carbon emissions for this pathway. These include reducing the need for patient travel, which can be achieved by greening hand therapy through increased use of virtual consultations and encouraging the use of mobile phone applications. We also recommend the adoption of circular economy principles by using reusable surgical gowns and drapes, creation of procedure-specific equipment packs, and increased use of wide-awake local anaesthesia, no tourniquet.
{"title":"Sustainability in hand trauma surgery: An eco-audit of the flexor tendon laceration repair pathway","authors":"Zahra Ahmed , Alexander Zargaran , Olivia Kamoga , Punn Tannirandorn , Sara Sousi , David Zargaran , Norbert Kang , Afshin Mosahebi","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.12.033","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.12.033","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hand trauma accounts for nearly one-third of emergency department (ED) attendances in the United Kingdom (UK). Particularly, repair of flexor tendon injuries is one of the most commonly performed plastic surgery procedures and requires months of repeated contact with hand therapy for optimal outcomes. The environmental impacts of treatment have not previously been evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A pilot retrospective service evaluation using process mapping and life-cycle assessment of 17 patients undergoing flexor tendon repair was performed using the functional unit of one completed patient pathway cycle, from ED to surgery, to rehabilitation and full recovery. Data were collected retrospectively from electronic patient records, supplier data and emission factor databases. Estimates for carbon dioxide emissions were generated in kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq., allowing us to look for specific opportunities for pathway optimisation, in line with the national guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We estimated the carbon footprint of a patient undergoing flexor tendon repair to be approximately 113.2 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq. The rehabilitation phase made the greatest contribution to emissions (59.9 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq., 52.9%) and patient travel was responsible for 79.4% of total emissions (89.9 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq.), followed by the production and transport of equipment (8.5 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq., 7.5%) needed for treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results of this pilot eco-audit identified key emission sources and potential interventions to reduce carbon emissions for this pathway. These include reducing the need for patient travel, which can be achieved by greening hand therapy through increased use of virtual consultations and encouraging the use of mobile phone applications. We also recommend the adoption of circular economy principles by using reusable surgical gowns and drapes, creation of procedure-specific equipment packs, and increased use of wide-awake local anaesthesia, no tourniquet.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 5-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145993585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-20DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.003
Pavlo O. Badiul , Sergii V. Sliesarenko
Background
The aesthetic outcome of abdominoplasty is largely defined by the appearance of the umbilicus. Existing neoumbilicoplasty techniques may result in suboptimal contour, asymmetry, or visible scarring. This study presents a novel four-flap “Hourglass” technique designed to replicate natural umbilical anatomy with high aesthetic precision.
Methods
A retrospective comparative analysis was performed in 49 female patients who underwent abdominoplasty with neoumbilicoplasty between 2020 and 2025. Patients were allocated into three groups according to the surgical technique: Hourglass (n = 19), vertical oval incision (n = 15), and inverted-U incision (n = 15). Aesthetic outcomes were independently assessed by two plastic surgeons using a five-parameter Likert scale (shape, size, depth, natural appearance, and scar quality; maximum score = 25). Postoperative complications were recorded.
Results
The Hourglass technique achieved the highest mean aesthetic scores across all parameters, with statistically significant superiority in shape (p = 0.0009), natural appearance (p < 0.0001), and scar quality (p = 0.00002). No statistically significant differences were observed for size (p = 0.068), depth (p = 0.347), or overall complication rate (p = 0.27).
Conclusions
The Hourglass neoumbilicoplasty offers a simple, reproducible, and anatomically accurate method for reconstructing a natural-appearing umbilicus. It provides symmetrical, stable, and aesthetically superior results without increasing complication rates, supporting its routine application in abdominoplasty.
{"title":"The “Hourglass” umbilicoplasty: An original four-flap design for aesthetic umbilical reconstruction","authors":"Pavlo O. Badiul , Sergii V. Sliesarenko","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The aesthetic outcome of abdominoplasty is largely defined by the appearance of the umbilicus. Existing neoumbilicoplasty techniques may result in suboptimal contour, asymmetry, or visible scarring. This study presents a novel four-flap “Hourglass” technique designed to replicate natural umbilical anatomy with high aesthetic precision.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective comparative analysis was performed in 49 female patients who underwent abdominoplasty with neoumbilicoplasty between 2020 and 2025. Patients were allocated into three groups according to the surgical technique: Hourglass (n = 19), vertical oval incision (n = 15), and inverted-U incision (n = 15). Aesthetic outcomes were independently assessed by two plastic surgeons using a five-parameter Likert scale (shape, size, depth, natural appearance, and scar quality; maximum score = 25). Postoperative complications were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Hourglass technique achieved the highest mean aesthetic scores across all parameters, with statistically significant superiority in shape (p = 0.0009), natural appearance (p < 0.0001), and scar quality (p = 0.00002). No statistically significant differences were observed for size (p = 0.068), depth (p = 0.347), or overall complication rate (p = 0.27).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Hourglass neoumbilicoplasty offers a simple, reproducible, and anatomically accurate method for reconstructing a natural-appearing umbilicus. It provides symmetrical, stable, and aesthetically superior results without increasing complication rates, supporting its routine application in abdominoplasty.</div></div><div><h3>Evidence rating scale for therapeutic studies</h3><div>Level of Evidence – III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 147-153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146080620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.004
Hussain A. Abdulla , Mohamed A. Abdulla , Raja Eid , Sameh Hashem , Ahmed Alhaddad
Background
The optimal timing of contralateral symmetrisation in oncoplastic breast surgery remains controversial. The aim was to compare outcomes between patients who underwent immediate versus delayed symmetrising procedures.
Methods
A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRIMSA guidelines. PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases were searched for studies reporting outcomes of oncoplastic procedures with immediate and delayed contralateral symmetrisation. Meta-analyses were conducted for surgical, oncological and patient-reported outcomes between the two groups.
Results
Twelve studies comprising 2339 (immediate, n = 1227 and delayed, n = 1112) patients were included. There were no significant differences in overall complications, all reoperations, reoperations for complications, aesthetic revisions, recurrence rates, delays in adjuvant therapy or patient-reported outcomes between the two groups. In the subgroup of patients who underwent breast conserving surgery, immediate symmetrisation was associated with lower rates of overall reoperations (19.3% vs 25%, p = 0.03), reoperations for complications (5.2% vs 10.9%, p = 0.01) and aesthetic revisions (6.6% v 15.2%, p = 0.0003). Delayed symmetrisation trended towards lower rates of aesthetic revisions in the mastectomy cohort (18% vs 28%, p = 0.002).
Conclusion
Immediate contralateral symmetrisation does not appear to increase oncologic risk and provides comparable overall outcomes to delayed procedures. In the setting of therapeutic mammaplasty, immediate symmetrisation may reduce the need for secondary procedures, thereby supporting its use in appropriately selected patients. These findings can help guide multidisciplinary decision-making and inform patient counselling regarding the timing of contralateral procedures in oncoplastic breast surgery, but it should be interpreted in the context of predominantly retrospective data and moderate heterogeneity.
背景:在乳腺肿瘤整形手术中对侧对称的最佳时机仍然存在争议。目的是比较接受即时和延迟对称手术的患者之间的结果。方法按照PRIMSA指南进行系统评价。检索PubMed、Embase和Scopus数据库,查找报告立即和延迟对侧对称的肿瘤整形手术结果的研究。对两组之间的手术、肿瘤和患者报告的结果进行meta分析。结果纳入12项研究,包括2339例患者(即刻,n = 1227,延迟,n = 1112)。两组患者在总并发症、所有再手术、并发症再手术、美学修复、复发率、辅助治疗延迟或患者报告的结果方面无显著差异。在接受保乳手术的患者亚组中,立即对称与总体再手术率(19.3% vs 25%, p = 0.03)、并发症再手术率(5.2% vs 10.9%, p = 0.01)和美学修复率(6.6% vs 15.2%, p = 0.0003)相关。在乳房切除术队列中,延迟对称倾向于较低的美学修复率(18% vs 28%, p = 0.002)。结论:即刻对侧对称手术不会增加肿瘤风险,并且与延迟手术的总体结果相当。在治疗性乳房成形术中,立即对称可以减少二次手术的需要,从而支持在适当选择的患者中使用。这些发现可以帮助指导多学科决策,并告知患者关于肿瘤乳房手术对侧手术时机的咨询,但它应该在主要回顾性数据和中等异质性的背景下进行解释。
{"title":"Immediate versus delayed symmetrisation of the contralateral breast after oncoplastic procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Hussain A. Abdulla , Mohamed A. Abdulla , Raja Eid , Sameh Hashem , Ahmed Alhaddad","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The optimal timing of contralateral symmetrisation in oncoplastic breast surgery remains controversial. The aim was to compare outcomes between patients who underwent immediate versus delayed symmetrising procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRIMSA guidelines. PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases were searched for studies reporting outcomes of oncoplastic procedures with immediate and delayed contralateral symmetrisation. Meta-analyses were conducted for surgical, oncological and patient-reported outcomes between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twelve studies comprising 2339 (immediate, n = 1227 and delayed, n = 1112) patients were included. There were no significant differences in overall complications, all reoperations, reoperations for complications, aesthetic revisions, recurrence rates, delays in adjuvant therapy or patient-reported outcomes between the two groups. In the subgroup of patients who underwent breast conserving surgery, immediate symmetrisation was associated with lower rates of overall reoperations (19.3% vs 25%, p = 0.03), reoperations for complications (5.2% vs 10.9%, p = 0.01) and aesthetic revisions (6.6% v 15.2%, p = 0.0003). Delayed symmetrisation trended towards lower rates of aesthetic revisions in the mastectomy cohort (18% vs 28%, p = 0.002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Immediate contralateral symmetrisation does not appear to increase oncologic risk and provides comparable overall outcomes to delayed procedures. In the setting of therapeutic mammaplasty, immediate symmetrisation may reduce the need for secondary procedures, thereby supporting its use in appropriately selected patients. These findings can help guide multidisciplinary decision-making and inform patient counselling regarding the timing of contralateral procedures in oncoplastic breast surgery, but it should be interpreted in the context of predominantly retrospective data and moderate heterogeneity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 89-99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146039490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-22DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.023
Angad S. Sidhu, Carson J. Park, Zohaib Iqbal, Steven J. Sullivan, Christopher Subi-Kasozi, George S. Corpuz, Cristiane M. Ueno
Plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) is highly competitive, and medical students benefit from early access to research, mentorship, and clinical exposure. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the largest source of biomedical funding in the U.S., yet its relationship to PRS resource availability across allopathic medical schools is poorly understood. This study examined whether NIH funding correlates with stronger PRS opportunities for students. A cross-sectional review of 150 U.S. allopathic medical schools was performed by assessing each school’s website for PRS resources, including residency programs, student interest groups (SIGs), mentorship, advising, shadowing, and research opportunities. Schools were categorized by AAMC region, and a total resource score was generated. NIH funding data were obtained from the Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research; schools without available data (n=10) were excluded. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS v31. Across all schools, 58% had PRS residencies, 54% offered research opportunities, 48% had SIGs, and fewer than one-third offered formal mentorship or advising. Total PRS resources were strongly correlated with NIH funding (Spearman’s Correlation Coefficient ρ=0.584; p<0.001). Highly funded schools had significantly greater odds of offering PRS residencies, research opportunities, mentorship, advising, and elective rotations (all p<0.001). PRS resources vary widely across U.S. medical schools and are strongly linked to NIH funding. Amid tightening federal support, programs, particularly at lower NIH-funded schools, should explore diversification toward non-government partnerships (foundations, philanthropy, industry, and alumni) to sustain equitable PRS exposure for students.
{"title":"The impact of institutional NIH funding on allopathic medical student exposure to plastic and reconstructive surgery","authors":"Angad S. Sidhu, Carson J. Park, Zohaib Iqbal, Steven J. Sullivan, Christopher Subi-Kasozi, George S. Corpuz, Cristiane M. Ueno","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.023","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjps.2026.01.023","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) is highly competitive, and medical students benefit from early access to research, mentorship, and clinical exposure. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the largest source of biomedical funding in the U.S., yet its relationship to PRS resource availability across allopathic medical schools is poorly understood. This study examined whether NIH funding correlates with stronger PRS opportunities for students. A cross-sectional review of 150 U.S. allopathic medical schools was performed by assessing each school’s website for PRS resources, including residency programs, student interest groups (SIGs), mentorship, advising, shadowing, and research opportunities. Schools were categorized by AAMC region, and a total resource score was generated. NIH funding data were obtained from the Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research; schools without available data (n=10) were excluded. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS v31. Across all schools, 58% had PRS residencies, 54% offered research opportunities, 48% had SIGs, and fewer than one-third offered formal mentorship or advising. Total PRS resources were strongly correlated with NIH funding (Spearman’s Correlation Coefficient ρ=0.584; p<0.001). Highly funded schools had significantly greater odds of offering PRS residencies, research opportunities, mentorship, advising, and elective rotations (all p<0.001). PRS resources vary widely across U.S. medical schools and are strongly linked to NIH funding. Amid tightening federal support, programs, particularly at lower NIH-funded schools, should explore diversification toward non-government partnerships (foundations, philanthropy, industry, and alumni) to sustain equitable PRS exposure for students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 85-88"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146039591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}