Pub Date : 2025-04-01DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2025.13114
Ruth Chang, Amity Campbell, Peter Kent, Peter O'Sullivan, Mark Hancock, Lesa Hoffman, Anne Smith
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether improvements in forward bending were related to reductions in pain catastrophizing (PC) and improvements in pain self-efficacy (PSE) in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) who were undergoing cognitive functional therapy (CFT). DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study. METHODS: Two hundred sixty-one participants with CLBP received CFT. Forward bending was assessed at each treatment session over 13 weeks (average of 4.3 time points per participant [range, 1-8]). Inertial measurement units placed on T12 and S2 measured spinal range of movement (ROM) and velocity. Participants completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire online at 0, 3, 6, and 13 weeks. Multivariate, multilevel models evaluated the associations between individual rates of change over time for 3 spinal movement measures (trunk velocity, trunk ROM, and lumbar ROM) as well as PC/PSE. RESULTS: Strong correlations were observed for increased trunk velocity with reduced PC (r = -0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.82, -0.01) and increased PSE (r = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.87). There was no evidence of an association between changes in trunk ROM and PC (r = -0.06; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.28) or PSE (r = 0.36; 95% CI: -0.27, 0.65) as well as no evidence of an association between lumbar ROM and PC (r = -0.07; 95% CI: -0.63, 0.55) or PSE (r = 0.16; 95% CI: -0.49, 0.69). CONCLUSION: Improvements in PC and PSE were strongly correlated with increased trunk velocity-but not trunk or lumbar ROM-in people with CLBP who were undergoing CFT. These findings are consistent with CFT that explicitly trains "nonprotective" spinal movement in conjunction with positively reframing pain cognitions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(4):1-11. Epub 12 March 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13114.
{"title":"Relationships Between Changes in Forward Bending, Pain Catastrophizing, and Pain Self-Efficacy During Cognitive Functional Therapy for People With Chronic Low Back Pain.","authors":"Ruth Chang, Amity Campbell, Peter Kent, Peter O'Sullivan, Mark Hancock, Lesa Hoffman, Anne Smith","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.13114","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2025.13114","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To investigate whether improvements in forward bending were related to reductions in pain catastrophizing (PC) and improvements in pain self-efficacy (PSE) in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) who were undergoing cognitive functional therapy (CFT). <b>DESIGN:</b> Longitudinal observational study. <b>METHODS:</b> Two hundred sixty-one participants with CLBP received CFT. Forward bending was assessed at each treatment session over 13 weeks (average of 4.3 time points per participant [range, 1-8]). Inertial measurement units placed on T12 and S2 measured spinal range of movement (ROM) and velocity. Participants completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire online at 0, 3, 6, and 13 weeks. Multivariate, multilevel models evaluated the associations between individual rates of change over time for 3 spinal movement measures (trunk velocity, trunk ROM, and lumbar ROM) as well as PC/PSE. <b>RESULTS:</b> Strong correlations were observed for increased trunk velocity with reduced PC (r = -0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.82, -0.01) and increased PSE (r = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.87). There was no evidence of an association between changes in trunk ROM and PC (r = -0.06; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.28) or PSE (r = 0.36; 95% CI: -0.27, 0.65) as well as no evidence of an association between lumbar ROM and PC (r = -0.07; 95% CI: -0.63, 0.55) or PSE (r = 0.16; 95% CI: -0.49, 0.69). <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Improvements in PC and PSE were strongly correlated with increased trunk velocity-but not trunk or lumbar ROM-in people with CLBP who were undergoing CFT. These findings are consistent with CFT that explicitly trains \"nonprotective\" spinal movement in conjunction with positively reframing pain cognitions. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(4):1-11. Epub 12 March 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13114</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 4","pages":"284-294"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143722357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2025.13182
François Desmeules, Jean-Sébastien Roy, Simon Lafrance, Maxime Charron, Marc-Olivier Dubé, Frédérique Dupuis, Jason M Beneciuk, Jason Grimes, H Mike Kim, Martin Lamontagne, Karen McCreesh, Ellen Shanley, Tatiana Vukobrat, Lori A Michener
This evidence-based clinical practice guideline (CPG) aims to guide clinicians with recommendations covering the assessment, treatment, and prognosis of adults with shoulder pain with suspected rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy, the nonsurgical medical care and rehabilitation of adults with RC tendinopathy, as well as the return to function and sport for elite and recreational athletes. This CPG includes recommendations for managing RC tendinopathy with or without calcifications and partial-thickness RC tears. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(4):235-274. Epub 30 January 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13182.
{"title":"Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy Diagnosis, Nonsurgical Medical Care, and Rehabilitation: A Clinical Practice Guideline","authors":"François Desmeules, Jean-Sébastien Roy, Simon Lafrance, Maxime Charron, Marc-Olivier Dubé, Frédérique Dupuis, Jason M Beneciuk, Jason Grimes, H Mike Kim, Martin Lamontagne, Karen McCreesh, Ellen Shanley, Tatiana Vukobrat, Lori A Michener","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.13182","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2025.13182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This evidence-based clinical practice guideline (CPG) aims to guide clinicians with recommendations covering the assessment, treatment, and prognosis of adults with shoulder pain with suspected rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy, the nonsurgical medical care and rehabilitation of adults with RC tendinopathy, as well as the return to function and sport for elite and recreational athletes. This CPG includes recommendations for managing RC tendinopathy with or without calcifications and partial-thickness RC tears. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(4):235-274. Epub 30 January 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13182</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 4","pages":"235-274"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143755585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Letter to the Editor-in-Chief in response to JOSPT article "Neuromuscular Control and Resistance Training for People With Chronic Low Back Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial" by Farragher JB, Pranata A, Williams GP, et al. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(4):305. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.0203.
针对JOSPT文章“慢性腰痛患者的神经肌肉控制和阻力训练:一项随机对照试验”,Farragher JB, Pranata a, Williams GP等人致总编辑的回复信。[J] .中华体育杂志,2015;55(4):305。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2025.0203。
{"title":"Neuromuscular Control and Resistance Training for Chronic Low Back Pain: Discussing A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"André Pontes-Silva","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.0203","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2025.0203","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Letter to the Editor-in-Chief in response to <i>JOSPT</i> article \"Neuromuscular Control and Resistance Training for People With Chronic Low Back Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial\" by Farragher JB, Pranata A, Williams GP, et al. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(4):305. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.0203</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 4","pages":"305"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143755582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2025.0203-R
Wei-Chun He, Jing Luo
Author response to the JOSPT Letter to the Editor-in-Chief "Neuromuscular Control and Resistance Training for Chronic Low Back Pain: Discussing a Randomized Controlled Trial" J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(4):305-306. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.0203-R.
{"title":"Comment on: Neuromuscular Control and Resistance Training for People With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Wei-Chun He, Jing Luo","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.0203-R","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2025.0203-R","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Author response to the <i>JOSPT</i> Letter to the Editor-in-Chief \"Neuromuscular Control and Resistance Training for Chronic Low Back Pain: Discussing a Randomized Controlled Trial\" <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(4):305-306. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.0203-R</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 4","pages":"305-306"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143755580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2025.12918
Melanie Fuller, Joshua Hanel, Susan Mayes, Tracy Bruce, Ebonie Rio
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of imaging findings that may be associated with osteoarthritis (OA), and their relationship with symptoms in dancers. DESIGN: Etiology systematic review with meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: Four electronic databases were searched (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus) from inception to September 2023. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Included studies reported joint imaging findings in dancers. We considered all study designs that investigated populations with regular participation in any form of dance, at any stage of career. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data were pooled for meta-analysis if at least 3 studies reported on the same intra-articular imaging findings, at the same joint, in a similar dance genre. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies were included. Meta-analysis was performed for the prevalence of hip, ankle, and first metatarsophalangeal joint OA, and ankle effusion. The first metatarsophalangeal joint had the highest prevalence of radiographic OA (59%). The prevalence of symptomatic OA was low (3%). The ankle (radiographic OA 41%) and then the hip (radiographic OA 19%) joint were the next most common regions to report imaging findings, with a lower prevalence of symptomatic OA seen at the ankle (2%) to pool 2 studies and hip (8%) to pool 4 studies. CONCLUSION: There was very low certainty evidence of the first metatarsophalangeal joint having the highest prevalence of imaging findings in dancers, followed by the ankle and hip joints. A lower prevalence of symptomatic OA was seen at all 3 joints. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;55(4):1-9. Epub 3 March 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.12918.
{"title":"Imaging Findings Associated With Osteoarthritis Are Common in Dancers, and Are Rarely Symptomatic: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Melanie Fuller, Joshua Hanel, Susan Mayes, Tracy Bruce, Ebonie Rio","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.12918","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2025.12918","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To estimate the prevalence of imaging findings that may be associated with osteoarthritis (OA), and their relationship with symptoms in dancers. <b>DESIGN:</b> Etiology systematic review with meta-analysis. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> Four electronic databases were searched (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus) from inception to September 2023. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> Included studies reported joint imaging findings in dancers. We considered all study designs that investigated populations with regular participation in any form of dance, at any stage of career. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> Data were pooled for meta-analysis if at least 3 studies reported on the same intra-articular imaging findings, at the same joint, in a similar dance genre. <b>RESULTS:</b> Thirty-two studies were included. Meta-analysis was performed for the prevalence of hip, ankle, and first metatarsophalangeal joint OA, and ankle effusion. The first metatarsophalangeal joint had the highest prevalence of radiographic OA (59%). The prevalence of symptomatic OA was low (3%). The ankle (radiographic OA 41%) and then the hip (radiographic OA 19%) joint were the next most common regions to report imaging findings, with a lower prevalence of symptomatic OA seen at the ankle (2%) to pool 2 studies and hip (8%) to pool 4 studies. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> There was very low certainty evidence of the first metatarsophalangeal joint having the highest prevalence of imaging findings in dancers, followed by the ankle and hip joints. A lower prevalence of symptomatic OA was seen at all 3 joints. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;55(4):1-9. Epub 3 March 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.12918</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 4","pages":"275-283"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143722355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2025.13072
Chad E Cook, Brian Degenhardt, Sasha Aspinall, Casper Nim, Shaista Malik, Damian Keter
SYNOPSIS: Myofascial pain syndromes (MPSs) affect a significant portion of the population. However, they remain controversial because their etiology, diagnostics, and effect mechanisms rely on theoretical frameworks with limited scientific rigor. This Viewpoint highlights 3 main challenges and proposes solutions: First, diagnosis lacks consistent criteria and is at risk of verification and incorporation biases. Tightened diagnostic criteria and differentiating myofascial pain syndrome from competing conditions will improve accuracy in research and clinical practice. Second, the etiology/pain mechanisms are poorly understood, with symptoms overlapping other conditions. We recommend recording of standardized assessments in national registries including psychological stress and systemic factors to identify distinct phenotypes. Third, the mechanisms behind treatments such as myofascial release and acupuncture are unclear. We advocate for mechanistic clinical trials to uncover how these treatments exert effects. Addressing these challenges will enhance understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of MPS and guide policymakers to fund appropriate research. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(4):1-4. Epub 10 February 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13072.
{"title":"Myofascial Pain Syndromes: Controversies and Suggestions for Improving Diagnosis and Treatment.","authors":"Chad E Cook, Brian Degenhardt, Sasha Aspinall, Casper Nim, Shaista Malik, Damian Keter","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.13072","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2025.13072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>SYNOPSIS:</b> Myofascial pain syndromes (MPSs) affect a significant portion of the population. However, they remain controversial because their etiology, diagnostics, and effect mechanisms rely on theoretical frameworks with limited scientific rigor. This Viewpoint highlights 3 main challenges and proposes solutions: First, diagnosis lacks consistent criteria and is at risk of verification and incorporation biases. Tightened diagnostic criteria and differentiating myofascial pain syndrome from competing conditions will improve accuracy in research and clinical practice. Second, the etiology/pain mechanisms are poorly understood, with symptoms overlapping other conditions. We recommend recording of standardized assessments in national registries including psychological stress and systemic factors to identify distinct phenotypes. Third, the mechanisms behind treatments such as myofascial release and acupuncture are unclear. We advocate for mechanistic clinical trials to uncover how these treatments exert effects. Addressing these challenges will enhance understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of MPS and guide policymakers to fund appropriate research. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(4):1-4. Epub 10 February 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13072</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 4","pages":"231-234"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143558526","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2025.12888
Frédérique Dupuis, Jason Robert Guertin, Rose Gagnon, Simon Larue, Maj Anny Fredette, Luc J Hébert, François Desmeules, Kadija Perreault, Jean-Sébastien Roy
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost-utility analysis of a group physiotherapy intervention, compared to usual care, for musculoskeletal disorders in Canadian military personnel. DESIGN: Economic evaluation alongside a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. METHODS: One hundred and twenty military members presenting with shoulder, knee, ankle, or low back pain were randomized to receive either usual one-on-one physiotherapy care or a group intervention. Cumulative health care costs were prospectively collected over 26 weeks from the perspective of the Canadian Armed Forces. The clinical outcome of the cost-utility analysis was the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) estimated by the ED-5Q-5L (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version) at baseline, 6, 12, and 26 weeks. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated by the cost difference between interventions (in 2023 Canadian dollars [CAD$]) divided by the effect difference. RESULTS: The mean QALY gain was 0.011 in the group intervention, and 0.010 in the usual care. The average cost for a patient was CAD $532 in the group intervention and CAD $599 in the usual care. The ICER (-$67 000/QALY) indicated that the group intervention was cost-effective, as it costs less than usual care while providing comparable effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Group interventions were cost-effective compared to usual care for treating musculoskeletal disorders in military personnel. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(4):1-10. Epub 26 Feb 2025. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2025.12888.
{"title":"Is Group-Based Physiotherapy a Cost-Effective Intervention Compared to Usual One-on-One Physiotherapy Care in the Management of Musculoskeletal Disorders in Active Military Personnel? An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Frédérique Dupuis, Jason Robert Guertin, Rose Gagnon, Simon Larue, Maj Anny Fredette, Luc J Hébert, François Desmeules, Kadija Perreault, Jean-Sébastien Roy","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.12888","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2025.12888","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To conduct a cost-utility analysis of a group physiotherapy intervention, compared to usual care, for musculoskeletal disorders in Canadian military personnel. <b>DESIGN:</b> Economic evaluation alongside a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. <b>METHODS:</b> One hundred and twenty military members presenting with shoulder, knee, ankle, or low back pain were randomized to receive either usual one-on-one physiotherapy care or a group intervention. Cumulative health care costs were prospectively collected over 26 weeks from the perspective of the Canadian Armed Forces. The clinical outcome of the cost-utility analysis was the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) estimated by the ED-5Q-5L (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version) at baseline, 6, 12, and 26 weeks. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated by the cost difference between interventions (in 2023 Canadian dollars [CAD$]) divided by the effect difference. <b>RESULTS:</b> The mean QALY gain was 0.011 in the group intervention, and 0.010 in the usual care. The average cost for a patient was CAD $532 in the group intervention and CAD $599 in the usual care. The ICER (-$67 000/QALY) indicated that the group intervention was cost-effective, as it costs less than usual care while providing comparable effectiveness. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Group interventions were cost-effective compared to usual care for treating musculoskeletal disorders in military personnel. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(4):1-10. Epub 26 Feb 2025. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2025.12888</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 4","pages":"295-304"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143722356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2025.12994
Stine Haugaard Clausen, Mikael Boesen, Jonas B Thorlund, Werner Vach, Martin Lind, Per Hölmich, Mogens Strange Hansen, Afsaneh Mohammadnejad, Søren T Skou
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings modified the outcomes of early surgery compared to exercise and education in young patients with meniscal tears. DESIGN: A secondary effect modifier analysis of a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: The primary outcome was change from baseline to 12 months in the mean score of 4 Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales (KOOS4). Three potential MRI-defined effect modifiers were predefined: (1) the type of meniscal tear (simple vs bucket handle or complex), (2) the meniscus affected (medial vs lateral), and (3) the presence of knee effusion/synovitis (yes/no). We used a linear mixed model to investigate the difference in mean change between the treatment groups, stratified by each of the 3 potential effect modifiers, and estimated the interactions. An adjusted effect difference ≥ 10 points (0-100 scale) was considered clinically relevant. RESULTS: Data from all participants (60 in the surgery group and 61 in the exercise group) were analyzed. The mean (SD) age was 29.7 (6.6) years, and 28% were female. A potential effect modification was observed for knee effusion/synovitis, with its presence implying an increase of the effect of early surgery by 11 points on the KOOS4 (P = .07). CONCLUSION: Knee effusion/synovitis on MRI potentially modified the treatment effect with a clinically relevant difference in change of the KOOS4 in patients with effusion/synovitis, favoring early surgery. We found no indication that patients with bucket handle or complex versus simple tears or medial versus lateral tears benefited more from early surgery. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(3):1-11. Epub 30 January 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.12994.
{"title":"Can Baseline MRI Findings Identify Who Responds Better to Early Surgery Versus Exercise and Education in Young Patients With Meniscal Tears? A Subgroup Analysis From the DREAM Trial.","authors":"Stine Haugaard Clausen, Mikael Boesen, Jonas B Thorlund, Werner Vach, Martin Lind, Per Hölmich, Mogens Strange Hansen, Afsaneh Mohammadnejad, Søren T Skou","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.12994","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2025.12994","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To investigate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings modified the outcomes of early surgery compared to exercise and education in young patients with meniscal tears. <b>DESIGN:</b> A secondary effect modifier analysis of a randomized controlled trial. <b>METHODS:</b> The primary outcome was change from baseline to 12 months in the mean score of 4 Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales (KOOS<sub>4</sub>). Three potential MRI-defined effect modifiers were predefined: (1) the type of meniscal tear (simple vs bucket handle or complex), (2) the meniscus affected (medial vs lateral), and (3) the presence of knee effusion/synovitis (yes/no). We used a linear mixed model to investigate the difference in mean change between the treatment groups, stratified by each of the 3 potential effect modifiers, and estimated the interactions. An adjusted effect difference ≥ 10 points (0-100 scale) was considered clinically relevant. <b>RESULTS:</b> Data from all participants (60 in the surgery group and 61 in the exercise group) were analyzed. The mean (SD) age was 29.7 (6.6) years, and 28% were female. A potential effect modification was observed for knee effusion/synovitis, with its presence implying an increase of the effect of early surgery by 11 points on the KOOS<sub>4</sub> (<i>P</i> = .07). <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Knee effusion/synovitis on MRI potentially modified the treatment effect with a clinically relevant difference in change of the KOOS<sub>4</sub> in patients with effusion/synovitis, favoring early surgery. We found no indication that patients with bucket handle or complex versus simple tears or medial versus lateral tears benefited more from early surgery. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(3):1-11. Epub 30 January 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.12994</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 3","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143484532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2025.12813
Matthew G King, Pim Van Klij, Fan Hoak, Signe Kierkegaard-Brøchner, Thomas J West, Mark J Scholes, Joshua J Heerey, Adam I Semciw, Charlotte Ganderton, Rachael M McMillan, Andrea M Bruder
OBJECTIVE: To compare return-to-sport outcomes between females/women/girls and males/men/boys undergoing hip arthroscopy and explore social and structural determinants of health that may influence return to sport. DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Medline, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science from inception to February 2024. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were included if they assessed return to sport after hip arthroscopy and analyzed the influence of sex/gender on return-to-sport outcomes, or reported sex- or gender-stratified return-to-sport rates. DATA SYNTHESIS: We used a random effects model to calculate pooled odds ratios and conducted meta-regressions to compare return-to-sport outcomes between females/women/girls and males/men/boys. RESULTS: Forty-five studies were included, with all pooled results deemed as very low-certainty evidence. Compared to males/men/boys, females/women/girls had inferior return to sport at the same or higher level between 1 and 3 years postoperatively (pooled OR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.81; P = .004), and at any level of sport at >3 years postoperatively (pooled OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.86; P = .014). Sports participation decreased over time, with ~5.5% to 10% lower proportions observed in females/women/girls compared to males/men/boys. The reporting of determinants of returning to sport was minimal, precluding further exploration of their effects. CONCLUSION: Females/women/girls had lower odds of return to sport, especially during longer follow-up periods, than males/men/boys. The lack of reporting of social and structural determinants of health influencing return-to-sport outcomes makes the reasons for this disparity unclear. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(3):1-13. Epub 10 February 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.12813.
目的:比较接受髋关节镜检查的女性/女性/女孩和男性/男性/男孩重返运动的结果,并探讨可能影响重返运动的健康的社会和结构决定因素。设计:采用荟萃分析的系统评价。文献检索:CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Medline, SPORTDiscus和Web of Science从成立到2024年2月。研究选择标准:纳入评估髋关节镜术后恢复运动的研究,并分析性别/性别对恢复运动结果的影响,或报告按性别或性别分层的恢复运动率。资料综合:我们使用随机效应模型来计算合并优势比,并进行meta回归来比较女性/女性/女孩和男性/男性/男孩重返运动的结果。结果:纳入了45项研究,所有合并结果都被认为是非常低确定性的证据。与男性/男性/男孩相比,女性/女性/女孩在术后1至3年的相同或更高水平的运动恢复率较低(合并or = 0.53;95% ci: 0.34, 0.81;P = 0.004),术后3年任何运动水平(合并OR = 0.46;95% ci: 0.25, 0.86;P = .014)。随着时间的推移,运动参与率下降,女性/女性/女孩的比例比男性/男性/男孩低5.5%至10%。关于重返体育运动的决定因素的报道很少,这妨碍了对其影响的进一步探索。结论:与男性/男性/男孩相比,女性/女性/女孩重返运动的几率较低,尤其是在较长的随访期内。由于缺乏对影响重返运动结果的健康的社会和结构决定因素的报告,造成这种差异的原因尚不清楚。[J] .体育学报,2015;55(3):1-13。2025年2月10日。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2025.12813。
{"title":"Are Women Less Likely to Return to Sport Compared to Men Following Hip Arthroscopy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Matthew G King, Pim Van Klij, Fan Hoak, Signe Kierkegaard-Brøchner, Thomas J West, Mark J Scholes, Joshua J Heerey, Adam I Semciw, Charlotte Ganderton, Rachael M McMillan, Andrea M Bruder","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.12813","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2025.12813","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To compare return-to-sport outcomes between females/women/girls and males/men/boys undergoing hip arthroscopy and explore social and structural determinants of health that may influence return to sport. <b>DESIGN:</b> Systematic review with meta-analysis. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Medline, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science from inception to February 2024. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> Studies were included if they assessed return to sport after hip arthroscopy and analyzed the influence of sex/gender on return-to-sport outcomes, or reported sex- or gender-stratified return-to-sport rates. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> We used a random effects model to calculate pooled odds ratios and conducted meta-regressions to compare return-to-sport outcomes between females/women/girls and males/men/boys. <b>RESULTS:</b> Forty-five studies were included, with all pooled results deemed as very low-certainty evidence. Compared to males/men/boys, females/women/girls had inferior return to sport at the same or higher level between 1 and 3 years postoperatively (pooled OR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.81; <i>P</i> = .004), and at any level of sport at >3 years postoperatively (pooled OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.86; <i>P</i> = .014). Sports participation decreased over time, with ~5.5% to 10% lower proportions observed in females/women/girls compared to males/men/boys. The reporting of determinants of returning to sport was minimal, precluding further exploration of their effects. <b>CONCLUSION</b>: Females/women/girls had lower odds of return to sport, especially during longer follow-up periods, than males/men/boys. The lack of reporting of social and structural determinants of health influencing return-to-sport outcomes makes the reasons for this disparity unclear. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(3):1-13. Epub 10 February 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.12813</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 3","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143517061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2025.13159
Matt Taberner, Tom Allen, Jason O'keefe, Meredith Chaput, Dustin Grooms, Daniel Dylan Cohen
BACKGROUND: On-pitch rehabilitation is key to supporting return to sport in elite soccer (football). The control-chaos continuum (CCC) guides practitioners through the sport-specific components of return to sport. There is a need to update the framework with recent research in injury neurophysiology, soccer performance, and coaching science. CLINICAL QUESTION: How do practitioners integrate the insights from injury neurophysiology, soccer performance, and coaching science discussed in part 1 of this 2-part series into an updated version of the CCC, to enhance the planning and execution of on-pitch rehabilitation for elite soccer players? KEY RESULTS: The revised CCC framework emphasizes the design and delivery of progressive training in increasingly chaotic conditions. The updated framework supports practitioners to incorporate elements of visual-cognitive challenges, attentional challenges, decision making, and progression representation of the game model when players are preparing to return to sport. CLINICAL APPLICATION: The updated CCC outlines training progression from High Control, which involves returning to on-pitch linear running, to High Chaos, which simulates the team environment at game speed. The High Chaos phase can be tailored to support players during their reintegration into team training. The model is adaptable for both short- and long-term injuries, integrating physical-cognitive load monitoring and strength and power diagnostics to enhance decision making throughout return to sport. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(3):1-11. Epub 17 January 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13159.
{"title":"Evolving the Control-Chaos Continuum: Part 2-Shifting \"Attention\" to Progress On-Pitch Rehabilitation.","authors":"Matt Taberner, Tom Allen, Jason O'keefe, Meredith Chaput, Dustin Grooms, Daniel Dylan Cohen","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.13159","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2025.13159","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>BACKGROUND:</b> On-pitch rehabilitation is key to supporting return to sport in elite soccer (football). The <i>control-chaos continuum</i> (<i>CCC</i>) guides practitioners through the sport-specific components of return to sport. There is a need to update the framework with recent research in injury neurophysiology, soccer performance, and coaching science. <b>CLINICAL QUESTION:</b> How do practitioners integrate the insights from injury neurophysiology, soccer performance, and coaching science discussed in part 1 of this 2-part series into an updated version of the <i>CCC</i>, to enhance the planning and execution of on-pitch rehabilitation for elite soccer players? <b>KEY RESULTS:</b> The revised <i>CCC</i> framework emphasizes the design and delivery of progressive training in increasingly <i>chaotic</i> conditions. The updated framework supports practitioners to incorporate elements of visual-cognitive challenges, attentional challenges, decision making, and progression representation of the game model when players are preparing to return to sport. <b>CLINICAL APPLICATION:</b> The updated <i>CCC</i> outlines training progression from <i>High Control</i>, which involves returning to on-pitch linear running, to <i>High Chaos</i>, which simulates the team environment at game speed. The <i>High Chaos</i> phase can be tailored to support players during their reintegration into team training. The model is adaptable for both short- and long-term injuries, integrating physical-cognitive load monitoring and strength and power diagnostics to enhance decision making throughout return to sport. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(3):1-11. Epub 17 January 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13159</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 3","pages":"162-172"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143484537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}