首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy最新文献

英文 中文
Pain Science in Practice (Part 6): How Does Descending Modulation of Pain Work? 疼痛科学实践(第 6 部分):疼痛的降序调节是如何起作用的?
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2024.12112
Morten Hoegh, Kirsty Bannister

Synopsis: To understand the neuroscience of pain relief, one must know about the descending pain modulatory system. Neuronal pathways that originate in the brainstem and project to the spinal cord to modulate spinal neuronal activity provide a well-documented perspective on the mechanisms of analgesia that underpin pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment options for people with musculoskeletal pain. Peripheral stimuli or signals from the cortex and subcortical regions of the brain can trigger the descending pain modulatory system (DPMS). The system helps explain how counter-stimulation techniques (eg, acupuncture and manual therapy), the patients' expectations and beliefs, and social or contextual factors could influence how people experience pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(2):1-4. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12112.

简介:要了解止痛的神经科学,就必须了解降序疼痛调节系统。起源于脑干并投射到脊髓以调节脊髓神经元活动的神经元通路,为肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的药物和非药物治疗选择所依据的镇痛机制提供了一个有据可查的视角。外周刺激或来自大脑皮层和皮层下区域的信号可触发降序疼痛调节系统(DPMS)。该系统有助于解释反刺激技术(如针灸和手法治疗)、患者的期望和信念以及社会或环境因素如何影响人们的疼痛体验。DOI:10.2519/JOSPT.2024.12112.
{"title":"Pain Science in Practice (Part 6): <i>How Does Descending Modulation of Pain Work?</i>","authors":"Morten Hoegh, Kirsty Bannister","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12112","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12112","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Synopsis: </strong>To understand the neuroscience of pain relief, one must know about the descending pain modulatory system. Neuronal pathways that originate in the brainstem and project to the spinal cord to modulate spinal neuronal activity provide a well-documented perspective on the mechanisms of analgesia that underpin pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment options for people with musculoskeletal pain. Peripheral stimuli or signals from the cortex and subcortical regions of the brain can trigger the descending pain modulatory system (DPMS). The system helps explain how counter-stimulation techniques (eg, acupuncture and manual therapy), the patients' expectations and beliefs, and social or contextual factors could influence how people experience pain. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(2):1-4. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12112</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"54 2","pages":"97-100"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139576912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Minimal Intervention of Patient Education for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. 腰痛患者教育的最小干预:一项荟萃分析的系统综述。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11865
Luís A Gomes, Ana M Rodrigues, Daniëlle van der Windt, Diogo Pires, Vera Afreixo, Helena Canhão, Eduardo B Cruz

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of minimal intervention of patient education (MIPE) for reducing disability and pain intensity in patients with low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. LITERATURE SEARCH: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases from inception to May 2023. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials comparing MIPE, consisting of a single session of patient education, to no or other interventions in patients with LBP. DATA SYNTHESIS: Random effects meta-analysis was conducted where possible. A noninferiority margin of 5 points (0-100 scale) was considered for noninferiority hypotheses. We assessed risk of bias using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2), and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. RESULTS: A total of 21 trials were included. There were no differences between MIPE and no intervention for effects on disability and pain intensity. There was low-certainty evidence that MIPE had inferior effects on short-term disability (mean difference = 3.62; 95% CI: 0.85, 6.38; 15 trials; n = 3066; I2 = 75%) and pain intensity (mean difference = 9.43; 95% CI: 1.31, 17.56; 10 trials; n = 1394; I2 = 90%) than other interventions. No differences were found for subsequent time points. CONCLUSION: As an intervention delivered in isolation, and without tailoring (ie, one-size-fits-all intervention), MIPE on average did not provide benefits for reducing disability and pain intensity over no or other interventions. We encourage clinicians to consider using additional/other or more tailored treatments when helping people manage LBP. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(2):1-13. Epub 16 November 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11865.

目的:探讨患者教育最小干预(MIPE)对减轻腰痛(LBP)患者残疾和疼痛强度的影响。设计:干预系统评价,随机对照试验荟萃分析。文献检索:我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、CENTRAL、CINAHL和PsycINFO数据库,检索时间从成立到2023年5月。研究选择标准:对LBP患者进行MIPE(包括单次患者教育)与不进行干预或其他干预的比较试验。资料综合:尽可能进行随机效应荟萃分析。对于非劣效性假设,考虑5分(0-100分)的非劣效性裕度。我们使用修订后的Cochrane风险-偏倚工具(RoB2)评估偏倚风险,并使用建议分级评估、发展评估(GRADE)框架评估证据的确定性。结果:共纳入21项试验。MIPE之间没有差异,对残疾和疼痛强度没有影响。低确定性证据表明,MIPE对短期残疾(平均差值为3.62 [95%CI 0.85, 6.38], 15项试验,n=3 066, 2=75%)和疼痛强度(平均差值为9.43 [95%CI 1.31, 17.56], 10项试验,n=1 394;I2=90%)。随后的时间点没有发现差异。结论:作为一种孤立的、没有剪裁的干预措施(即,一刀切的干预措施),平均而言,MIPE在减少残疾和疼痛强度方面没有比没有或其他干预措施更好的效果。我们鼓励临床医生在帮助患者控制腰痛时考虑使用额外/其他或更有针对性的治疗方法。
{"title":"Minimal Intervention of Patient Education for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.","authors":"Luís A Gomes, Ana M Rodrigues, Daniëlle van der Windt, Diogo Pires, Vera Afreixo, Helena Canhão, Eduardo B Cruz","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11865","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11865","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To explore the effects of minimal intervention of patient education (MIPE) for reducing disability and pain intensity in patients with low back pain (LBP). <b>DESIGN:</b> Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases from inception to May 2023. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> Trials comparing MIPE, consisting of a single session of patient education, to no or other interventions in patients with LBP. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> Random effects meta-analysis was conducted where possible. A noninferiority margin of 5 points (0-100 scale) was considered for noninferiority hypotheses. We assessed risk of bias using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2), and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. <b>RESULTS:</b> A total of 21 trials were included. There were no differences between MIPE and no intervention for effects on disability and pain intensity. There was low-certainty evidence that MIPE had inferior effects on short-term disability (mean difference = 3.62; 95% CI: 0.85, 6.38; 15 trials; n = 3066; I<sup>2</sup> = 75%) and pain intensity (mean difference = 9.43; 95% CI: 1.31, 17.56; 10 trials; n = 1394; I<sup>2</sup> = 90%) than other interventions. No differences were found for subsequent time points. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> As an intervention delivered in isolation, and without tailoring (ie, one-size-fits-all intervention), MIPE on average did not provide benefits for reducing disability and pain intensity over no or other interventions. We encourage clinicians to consider using additional/other or more tailored treatments when helping people manage LBP. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(2):1-13. Epub 16 November 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11865</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"107-119"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136400105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Running-Related Injuries Among More Than 7000 Runners in 87 Different Countries: The Garmin-RUNSAFE Running Health Study. 跑步相关的伤害在87个不同国家的7000多名跑步者:Garmin-RUNSAFE跑步健康研究
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11959
Rasmus Nielsen, Daniel Ramskov, Chloe Taneil Blacket, Laurent Malisoux

OBJECTIVE: To describe the cumulative injury proportion after 1000 and 2000 km of running among runners from 87 countries worldwide using wearable devices. Secondly, examine if the cumulative injury proportion differed between runners from different countries. DESIGN: Cohort study with an 18-month follow-up. METHODS: Runners aged ≥18 years who were familiar with the English language, and who were using a Garmin sports watch that supported tracking of running were eligible for inclusion. The exposure was residential country; self-reported running-related injury was the primary outcome. A generalized linear model was used to estimate the cumulative injury proportion for each country and the cumulative risk difference between the countries (country with the lowest risk used as reference). Data were analyzed at 1000 and 2000 km. RESULTS: The proportions of injured runners among the 7605 included runners from 87 different countries were 57.6% [95% CI: 56.9%, 59.0%] at 1000 km and 69.8% [95% CI: 68.3%, 71.4%] at 2000 km. Runners from the Czech Republic (40.3% [95% CI: 28.7%, 51.9%]), Austria (41.1% [95% CI: 25.9%, 52.2%]), and Germany (41.9% [95% CI: 36.0%, 47.9%]) had the lowest cumulative injury proportions at 1000 km, whereas Ireland (75.4% [95% CI: 60.4%, 90.4%]), Great Britain and Northern Ireland (73.2% [95% CI: 69.3%, 77.1%]), and Finland (67.5% [95% CI: 47.2%, 87.7%]) had the highest proportions. At 2000 km, Poland (47.7% [95% CI: 36.0%, 59.4%]), Slovenia (52.2% [95% CI: 28.5%, 75.8%]), and Croatia (54.2% [95% CI: 35.6%, 72.7%]) had the lowest proportions of injured runners. The highest cumulative injury proportions were reported in Great Britain and Northern Ireland (83.6% [95% CI: 79.6%, 87.6%]) and the Netherlands (78.3% [95% CI: 70.6%, 85.9%]). CONCLUSION: More than half of the population of adult runners from 87 countries using wearable devices sustained a running-related injury during follow-up. There were considerable between-country differences in injury proportions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(2):1-9. Epub 16 November 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11959.

目的:描述来自全球87个国家的跑步者使用可穿戴设备跑步1000公里和2000公里后的累积损伤比例。其次,考察不同国家跑步者的累积损伤比例是否存在差异。设计:队列研究,随访18个月。方法:年龄≥18岁、熟悉英语、使用Garmin运动手表支持跑步跟踪的跑步者符合纳入条件。暴露于居住国家;自我报告的跑步相关损伤是主要结果。采用广义线性模型估计各国的累积伤害比例和各国之间的累积风险差异(以风险最低的国家为参照)。数据分别在1000公里和2000公里处进行分析。结果:来自87个不同国家的7605名跑步者中,1000公里时受伤的比例为57.6% [95%CI:56.9% ~ 59.0%], 2000公里时受伤的比例为69.8% [95%CI:68.3% ~ 71.4%]。来自捷克共和国(40.3% [95%CI:28.7%-51.9%])、奥地利(41.1% [95%CI:25.9%-52.2%])和德国(41.9% [95%CI:36.0%-47.9%])的跑步者在1000公里累积损伤比例最低,而爱尔兰(75.4%[95%CI:60.4%-90.4%])、英国和北爱尔兰(73.2% [95%CI:69.3%-77.1%])和芬兰(67.5% [95%CI: 47.2%-87.7%])的比例最高。在2000公里比赛中,波兰(47.7% [95%CI:36.0%- 59.4%])、斯洛文尼亚(52.2% [95%CI:28.5%-75.8%])和克罗地亚(54.2% [95%CI:35.6%-72.7%])的受伤运动员比例最低。据报道,英国和北爱尔兰(83.6% [95%CI:79.6%-87.6%])和荷兰(78.3% [95%CI:70.6%-85.9%])的累积损伤比例最高。结论:来自87个国家的使用可穿戴设备的成年跑步者中,超过一半的人在随访期间遭受了与跑步相关的伤害。不同国家之间在损伤比例上存在相当大的差异。
{"title":"Running-Related Injuries Among More Than 7000 Runners in 87 Different Countries: The Garmin-RUNSAFE Running Health Study.","authors":"Rasmus Nielsen, Daniel Ramskov, Chloe Taneil Blacket, Laurent Malisoux","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11959","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11959","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To describe the cumulative injury proportion after 1000 and 2000 km of running among runners from 87 countries worldwide using wearable devices. Secondly, examine if the cumulative injury proportion differed between runners from different countries. <b>DESIGN:</b> Cohort study with an 18-month follow-up. <b>METHODS:</b> Runners aged ≥18 years who were familiar with the English language, and who were using a Garmin sports watch that supported tracking of running were eligible for inclusion. The exposure was residential country; self-reported running-related injury was the primary outcome. A generalized linear model was used to estimate the cumulative injury proportion for each country and the cumulative risk difference between the countries (country with the lowest risk used as reference). Data were analyzed at 1000 and 2000 km. <b>RESULTS:</b> The proportions of injured runners among the 7605 included runners from 87 different countries were 57.6% [95% CI: 56.9%, 59.0%] at 1000 km and 69.8% [95% CI: 68.3%, 71.4%] at 2000 km. Runners from the Czech Republic (40.3% [95% CI: 28.7%, 51.9%]), Austria (41.1% [95% CI: 25.9%, 52.2%]), and Germany (41.9% [95% CI: 36.0%, 47.9%]) had the lowest cumulative injury proportions at 1000 km, whereas Ireland (75.4% [95% CI: 60.4%, 90.4%]), Great Britain and Northern Ireland (73.2% [95% CI: 69.3%, 77.1%]), and Finland (67.5% [95% CI: 47.2%, 87.7%]) had the highest proportions. At 2000 km, Poland (47.7% [95% CI: 36.0%, 59.4%]), Slovenia (52.2% [95% CI: 28.5%, 75.8%]), and Croatia (54.2% [95% CI: 35.6%, 72.7%]) had the lowest proportions of injured runners. The highest cumulative injury proportions were reported in Great Britain and Northern Ireland (83.6% [95% CI: 79.6%, 87.6%]) and the Netherlands (78.3% [95% CI: 70.6%, 85.9%]). <b>CONCLUSION:</b> More than half of the population of adult runners from 87 countries using wearable devices sustained a running-related injury during follow-up. There were considerable between-country differences in injury proportions. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(2):1-9. Epub 16 November 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11959</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"133-141"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136400039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Who's Afraid of Electrical Stimulation? Let's Revisit the Application of NMES at the Knee. 谁害怕电刺激?让我们再来看看NMES在膝关节的应用。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.12028
Elanna K Arhos, Naoaki Ito, Airelle Hunter-Giordano, Thomas P Nolan, Lynn Snyder-Mackler, Karin Grävare Silbernagel

BACKGROUND: Restoring quadriceps strength is essential for successful rehabilitation of knee injuries, but many athletes return to their previous activity with persisting muscle weakness. Strong evidence supports using neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to improve quadriceps strength; however, there is a lack of widespread clinical implementation. We believe there is a critical need to provide clinical approaches that promote using NMES to improve patients' quadriceps strength and ensuring clinicians provide high-value rehabilitation care. CLINICAL QUESTION: What is best practice when using NMES to facilitate strength after injury, what are barriers to its use, and how can they be addressed? KEY RESULTS: We discuss the low clinical implementation of NMES, perceived barriers to using NMES, and provide recommendations for setup and dosage parameters for effective use of NMES. CLINICAL APPLICATION: We aim for this commentary, with accompanying videos, to serve as a resource for clinicians who are using commercially available NMES units in clinical practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(2):1-6. Epub 31 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12028.

背景:恢复股四头肌的力量是成功康复膝关节损伤的关键,但许多运动员在持续肌肉无力的情况下恢复了以前的活动。强有力的证据支持使用神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)来提高股四头肌的力量,然而,缺乏广泛的临床应用。我们认为,迫切需要提供临床方法,促进使用NMES来提高患者的股四头肌力量,并确保临床医生提供高价值的康复护理。临床问题:使用NMES促进受伤后力量的最佳实践是什么?使用NMES的障碍是什么?如何解决这些障碍?关键结果:我们讨论了NMES的临床实施率低、使用NMES的障碍,并为有效使用NMES提供了设置和剂量参数的建议。临床应用:我们的目的是将这篇评论和随附的视频作为临床医生在临床实践中使用商用NMES单元的资源。
{"title":"Who's Afraid of Electrical Stimulation? Let's Revisit the Application of NMES at the Knee.","authors":"Elanna K Arhos, Naoaki Ito, Airelle Hunter-Giordano, Thomas P Nolan, Lynn Snyder-Mackler, Karin Grävare Silbernagel","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.12028","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.12028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>BACKGROUND</b>: Restoring quadriceps strength is essential for successful rehabilitation of knee injuries, but many athletes return to their previous activity with persisting muscle weakness. Strong evidence supports using neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to improve quadriceps strength; however, there is a lack of widespread clinical implementation. We believe there is a critical need to provide clinical approaches that promote using NMES to improve patients' quadriceps strength and ensuring clinicians provide high-value rehabilitation care. <b>CLINICAL QUESTION</b>: What is best practice when using NMES to facilitate strength after injury, what are barriers to its use, and how can they be addressed? <b>KEY RESULTS</b>: We discuss the low clinical implementation of NMES, perceived barriers to using NMES, and provide recommendations for setup and dosage parameters for effective use of NMES. <b>CLINICAL APPLICATION</b>: We aim for this commentary, with accompanying videos, to serve as a resource for clinicians who are using commercially available NMES units in clinical practice. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(2):1-6. Epub 31 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12028</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"101-106"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10872626/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71414982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
JOSPT February 2024 Corrigendum. JOSPT 2024 年 2 月 更正。
IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2024.54.2.153

Correction to an article that was published in the September 2019 issue of JOSPT: Willy RW, Hoglund LT, Barton CJ, Bolgla LA, Scalzitti DA, Logerstedt DS, Lynch AD, Snyder-Mackler L, McDonough CM. Patellofemoral Pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(2):153. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.54.2.153.

更正发表在《JOSPT》2019 年 9 月刊上的一篇文章:Willy RW、Hoglund LT、Barton CJ、Bolgla LA、Scalzitti DA、Logerstedt DS、Lynch AD、Snyder-Mackler L、McDonough CM。髌骨股骨痛DOI:10.2519/JOSPT.2024.54.2.153.
{"title":"<i>JOSPT</i> February 2024 Corrigendum.","authors":"","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2024.54.2.153","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2024.54.2.153","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Correction to an article that was published in the September 2019 issue of <i>JOSPT</i>: Willy RW, Hoglund LT, Barton CJ, Bolgla LA, Scalzitti DA, Logerstedt DS, Lynch AD, Snyder-Mackler L, McDonough CM. Patellofemoral Pain. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(2):153. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.54.2.153</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"54 2","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139543448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Barriers and Enablers to Using Intervention Reporting Guidelines in Sports and Exercise Medicine Trials: A Mixed-Methods Study. 在运动和运动医学试验中使用干预报告指南的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法研究。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.12110
Harrison J Hansford, Aidan G Cashin, Joseph Doyle, Hayley B Leake, James H McAuley, Matthew D Jones

OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers and facilitators for using intervention reporting guidelines (CERT and TIDieR) from authors of randomized controlled trials in sports and exercise medicine journals. DESIGN: Mixed-methods cross-sectional online survey. METHODS: We recruited authors of randomized controlled trials published from June 2, 2018, to June 2, 2022, in the 10 leading sports and exercise medicine journals. We invited authors of eligible trials to complete an online survey that included multiple-choice and Likert-scale questions, as well as open-ended free-text questions on the barriers and facilitators to using intervention reporting guidelines. We used descriptive analysis to summarize the quantitative data and a hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis to identify barriers and facilitators from the qualitative data. We conducted a subgroup analysis to explore differences in barriers and facilitators between early-mid career researchers and senior researchers. RESULTS: Eighty-four participants from 21 countries completed the survey (44 early-mid-career researchers, 40 senior researchers). We identified 8 themes relating to using intervention reporting guidelines. Themes classified as barriers related to publication constraints (word count limits), low awareness of intervention reporting guidelines, unclear benefits of the guidelines, and the increased burden imposed upon the researcher. Themes classified as facilitators related to journal requirements for guidelines use, the desire to accurately describe interventions, recommendations from other researchers, and reporting guideline use indicating "quality" of work. CONCLUSION: Barriers to using intervention reporting guidelines are largely modifiable and could be addressed by journals mandating their use, and educational initiatives. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(2):1-11. Epub 16 November 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12110.

目的:从体育和运动医学期刊上的随机对照试验作者那里确定使用干预报告指南(CERT和TIDieR)的障碍和促进因素。设计:混合方法横断面在线调查。方法:我们招募了2018年6月2日至2022年6月2日在十大主要体育和运动医学期刊上发表的随机对照试验的作者。我们邀请合格试验的作者完成一项在线调查,包括多项选择题和李克特量表问题,以及关于使用干预报告指南的障碍和促进因素的开放式免费文本问题。我们使用描述性分析来总结定量数据,并使用混合演绎-归纳主题分析来从定性数据中识别障碍和促进因素。我们通过亚组分析来探讨职业生涯早期和中期的研究人员与高级研究人员在障碍和促进因素方面的差异。结果:来自21个国家的84名参与者完成了调查(44名早期中期职业人员,40名高级研究人员)。我们确定了与使用干预报告指南有关的八个主题。主题被归类为与发表限制(字数限制)、干预报告指南意识不足、指南益处不明确以及研究者负担增加有关的障碍。分类为促进因素的主题与指南使用的期刊要求、准确描述干预措施的愿望、其他研究人员的建议以及报告指南使用表明工作“质量”有关。结论:使用干预报告指南的障碍在很大程度上是可以修改的,可以通过期刊强制使用和教育倡议来解决。
{"title":"Barriers and Enablers to Using Intervention Reporting Guidelines in Sports and Exercise Medicine Trials: A Mixed-Methods Study.","authors":"Harrison J Hansford, Aidan G Cashin, Joseph Doyle, Hayley B Leake, James H McAuley, Matthew D Jones","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.12110","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.12110","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>: To identify barriers and facilitators for using intervention reporting guidelines (CERT and TIDieR) from authors of randomized controlled trials in sports and exercise medicine journals. <b>DESIGN</b>: Mixed-methods cross-sectional online survey. <b>METHODS</b>: We recruited authors of randomized controlled trials published from June 2, 2018, to June 2, 2022, in the 10 leading sports and exercise medicine journals. We invited authors of eligible trials to complete an online survey that included multiple-choice and Likert-scale questions, as well as open-ended free-text questions on the barriers and facilitators to using intervention reporting guidelines. We used descriptive analysis to summarize the quantitative data and a hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis to identify barriers and facilitators from the qualitative data. We conducted a subgroup analysis to explore differences in barriers and facilitators between early-mid career researchers and senior researchers. <b>RESULTS</b>: Eighty-four participants from 21 countries completed the survey (44 early-mid-career researchers, 40 senior researchers). We identified 8 themes relating to using intervention reporting guidelines. Themes classified as barriers related to publication constraints (word count limits), low awareness of intervention reporting guidelines, unclear benefits of the guidelines, and the increased burden imposed upon the researcher. Themes classified as facilitators related to journal requirements for guidelines use, the desire to accurately describe interventions, recommendations from other researchers, and reporting guideline use indicating \"quality\" of work. <b>CONCLUSION</b>: Barriers to using intervention reporting guidelines are largely modifiable and could be addressed by journals mandating their use, and educational initiatives. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(2):1-11. Epub 16 November 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12110</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"142-152"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136400104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Which Psychological and Psychosocial Constructs Are Important to Measure in Future Tendinopathy Clinical Trials? A Modified International Delphi Study With Expert Clinician/Researchers and People With Tendinopathy. 在未来的腱病临床试验中,哪些心理和社会心理结构是重要的衡量标准?一项由专业临床医生/研究人员和肌腱病患者参与的改良国际德尔菲研究。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11903
Carl Stubbs, Sean McAuliffe, Ruth L Chimenti, Brooke K Coombes, Terry Haines, Luke Heales, Robert Jan de Vos, Greg Lehman, Adrian Mallows, Lori A Michner, Neal L Millar, Seth O'Neill, Kieran O'Sullivan, Melanie Plinsinga, Michael Rathleff, Ebonie Rio, Megan Ross, Jean-Sebastien Roy, Karin Gravare Silbernagel, Athol Thomson, Tim Trevail, Inge van den Akker-Scheek, Bill Vicenzino, Johan W S Vlaeyen, Rafael Zambelli Pinto, Peter Malliaras

OBJECTIVE: To identify which psychological and psychosocial constructs to include in a core outcome set to guide future clinical trials in the tendinopathy field. DESIGN: Modified International Delphi study. METHODS: In 3 online Delphi rounds, we presented 35 psychological and psychosocial constructs to an international panel of 38 clinician/researchers and people with tendinopathy. Using a 9-point Likert scale (1 = not important to include, 9 = critical to include), consensus for construct inclusion required ≥70% of respondents rating "extremely critical to include" (score ≥7) and ≤15% rating "not important to include" (score ≤3). Consensus for exclusion required ≥70% of respondents rating "not important to include" (score ≤3) and ≤15% of rating "critical to include" (score ≥7). RESULTS: Thirty-six participants (95% of 38) completed round 1, 90% (n = 34) completed round 2, and 87% (n = 33) completed round 3. Four constructs were deemed important to include as part of a core outcome set: kinesiophobia (82%, median: 8, interquartile range [IQR]: 1.0), pain beliefs (76%, median: -7, IQR: 1.0), pain-related self-efficacy (71%, median: 7, IQR: 2.0), and fear-avoidance beliefs (73%, median: -7, IQR: 1.0). Six constructs were deemed not important to include: perceived injustice (82%), individual attitudes of family members (74%), social isolation and loneliness (73%), job satisfaction (73%), coping (70%), and educational attainment (70%). Clinician/researchers and people with tendinopathy reached consensus that kinesiophobia, pain beliefs, pain self-efficacy, and fear-avoidance beliefs were important psychological constructs to measure in tendinopathy clinical trials. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(1):1-12. Epub 20 September 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11903.

目的:确定哪些心理和社会心理结构应纳入核心结果集,以指导腱病领域未来的临床试验。设计:修改国际德尔菲研究。方法:在三轮德尔菲在线调查中,我们向一个由38名临床医生/研究人员和腱病患者组成的国际小组提出了35个心理和社会心理结构。使用9分Likert量表(1-不重要,9-关键,包括在内),对结构纳入的共识要求≥70%的受访者评分为“非常关键,包括”(得分≥7),≤15%的受访者评分“不重要,包括”。排除的一致性要求≥70%的受访者评分为“不重要,不包括在内”(得分≤3),≤15%的受访者评分“关键,不包括”(得分≥7)。结果:36名参与者(38人中的95%)完成了第一轮,90%(n=34)完成了第二轮,87%(n=33)完成了三轮。四个结构被认为是重要的,可以作为核心结果集的一部分:运动恐惧症(82%,中位数:8,四分位间距(IQR):1.0)、疼痛信念(76%,中位数:-7,IQR:1.0)、疼痛相关自我效能感(71%,中位数:7,IQR:2.0)和恐惧回避信念(73%,中位数:-7IQR:1.0,家庭成员的个人态度(74%)、社会孤立和孤独(73%)、工作满意度(73%),应对能力(70%)和教育程度(70%)。临床医生/研究人员和腱病患者达成共识,运动恐惧症、疼痛信念、疼痛自我效能感和恐惧回避信念是腱病临床试验中需要衡量的重要心理结构。
{"title":"Which Psychological and Psychosocial Constructs Are Important to Measure in Future Tendinopathy Clinical Trials? A Modified International Delphi Study With Expert Clinician/Researchers and People With Tendinopathy.","authors":"Carl Stubbs, Sean McAuliffe, Ruth L Chimenti, Brooke K Coombes, Terry Haines, Luke Heales, Robert Jan de Vos, Greg Lehman, Adrian Mallows, Lori A Michner, Neal L Millar, Seth O'Neill, Kieran O'Sullivan, Melanie Plinsinga, Michael Rathleff, Ebonie Rio, Megan Ross, Jean-Sebastien Roy, Karin Gravare Silbernagel, Athol Thomson, Tim Trevail, Inge van den Akker-Scheek, Bill Vicenzino, Johan W S Vlaeyen, Rafael Zambelli Pinto, Peter Malliaras","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11903","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11903","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To identify which psychological and psychosocial constructs to include in a core outcome set to guide future clinical trials in the tendinopathy field. <b>DESIGN:</b> Modified International Delphi study. <b>METHODS:</b> In 3 online Delphi rounds, we presented 35 psychological and psychosocial constructs to an international panel of 38 clinician/researchers and people with tendinopathy. Using a 9-point Likert scale (1 = not important to include, 9 = critical to include), consensus for construct inclusion required ≥70% of respondents rating \"<i>extremely critical to include</i>\" (score ≥7) and ≤15% rating \"<i>not important to include</i>\" (score ≤3). Consensus for exclusion required ≥70% of respondents rating \"<i>not important to include\"</i> (score ≤3) and ≤15% of rating \"critical to include\" (score ≥7). <b>RESULTS:</b> Thirty-six participants (95% of 38) completed round 1, 90% (n = 34) completed round 2, and 87% (n = 33) completed round 3. Four constructs were deemed important to include as part of a core outcome set: kinesiophobia (82%, median: 8, interquartile range [IQR]: 1.0), pain beliefs (76%, median: -7, IQR: 1.0), pain-related self-efficacy (71%, median: 7, IQR: 2.0), and fear-avoidance beliefs (73%, median: -7, IQR: 1.0). Six constructs were deemed not important to include: perceived injustice (82%), individual attitudes of family members (74%), social isolation and loneliness (73%), job satisfaction (73%), coping (70%), and educational attainment (70%). Clinician/researchers and people with tendinopathy reached consensus that kinesiophobia, pain beliefs, pain self-efficacy, and fear-avoidance beliefs were important psychological constructs to measure in tendinopathy clinical trials. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(1):1-12. Epub 20 September 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11903</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"14-25"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41137506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Tendinopathy Game Changers: Five Papers From the Last 5 Years That Might Change How You Manage Tendons. 肌腱病变改变者:过去五年的五篇论文可能会改变你管理肌腱的方式。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.12372
Myles C Murphy, Ebonie K Rio

SYNOPSIS: The clinical and scientific understanding of tendinopathy has substantially advanced since the Fifth International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium in 2019. This editorial aims to highlight some of the fantastic tendinopathy research from the past 5 years. We have selected what we consider the "best paper" for each year from 2019 to 2023, which might change how you treat tendons. Selecting only 5 papers was not easy. Did your favorite papers make the cut? Or do you think we missed some key studies? We encourage you to tell us what you think using the social media hashtag #JOSPTtendon. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(1):1-3. Epub 16 November 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12372.

摘要:自2019年第五届国际肌腱病科学研讨会以来,对肌腱病的临床和科学认识取得了实质性进展。这篇社论的目的是强调过去五年来一些奇妙的肌腱病研究。从2019年到2023年,我们每年都会选出我们认为的“最佳论文”,这可能会改变你对待肌腱的方式。然而,只选择五篇论文并不容易。你最喜欢的报纸入选了吗?或者你认为我们错过了一些关键的研究?我们鼓励大家使用社交媒体标签# jospt肌腱告诉我们你的想法。
{"title":"The Tendinopathy Game Changers: Five Papers From the Last 5 Years That Might Change How You Manage Tendons.","authors":"Myles C Murphy, Ebonie K Rio","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.12372","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.12372","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>SYNOPSIS:</b> The clinical and scientific understanding of tendinopathy has substantially advanced since the Fifth International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium in 2019. This editorial aims to highlight some of the fantastic tendinopathy research from the past 5 years. We have selected what we consider the \"best paper\" for each year from 2019 to 2023, which might change how you treat tendons. Selecting only 5 papers was not easy. Did your favorite papers make the cut? Or do you think we missed some key studies? We encourage you to tell us what you think using the social media hashtag #JOSPTtendon. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(1):1-3. Epub 16 November 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12372</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"3-5"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134650291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Tests for Assessing Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. 评估大转子疼痛综合征的临床试验诊断准确性:一项meta分析的系统综述。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11890
Rita Kinsella, Adam I Semciw, Lyndon J Hawke, James Stoney, Peter F M Choong, Michelle M Dowsey

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of clinical tests that are used to diagnose greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) in clinical practice. DESIGN: Diagnostic test accuracy systematic review with meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, and SPORTDiscus were searched using key words mapped to diagnostic test accuracy for GTPS. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies with published or derivable diagnostic accuracy data were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, and certainty of evidence, via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. MetaDTA "R" random-effects models were used to summarize individual and pooled data including sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and pretest/posttest probabilities. RESULTS: From a database yield of 858 studies, 23 full texts were assessed. We included 6 studies for review, involving 15 tests and 272 participants (314 hips). Overall certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Meta-analysis of 6 tests revealed sequenced test clusters able to significantly shift pretest-posttest probability for or against a GTPS diagnosis. In people reporting lateral hip pain, a negative gluteal tendon (GT) palpation test followed by a negative resisted hip abduction test significantly reduced the posttest probability of GTPS from 59% to 14%. In those with a positive GT palpation test followed by a positive resisted hip abduction test, the posttest probability of GTPS significantly shifted from 59% to 96%. CONCLUSION: The value of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing GTPS is debated. We have identified a straightforward, clinically useful diagnostic test cluster to help confirm or refute the presence of GTPS in people reporting lateral hip pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(1):1-24. Epub 10 August 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11890.

目的:我们旨在评估临床实践中用于诊断大转子疼痛综合征(GTPS)的临床试验的准确性。设计:诊断测试准确性系统评价与荟萃分析。文献检索:MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED和SPORTDiscus使用映射到GTPS诊断测试准确性的关键词进行检索。研究选择标准:纳入有已发表或可衍生诊断准确性数据的研究。数据综合:使用QUADAS-2工具评估偏倚风险,并通过推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)框架评估证据的确定性。meta - adta“R”随机效应模型用于总结个体和汇总数据,包括敏感性、特异性、似然比和前测/后测概率。结果:从858项研究的数据库中,评估了23篇全文。我们纳入6项研究进行综述,涉及15项试验和272名参与者(314髋)。证据的总体确定性从极低到中等。6项测试的荟萃分析显示,测序测试簇能够显著改变GTPS诊断的前测后验概率。在报告髋关节外侧疼痛的患者中,臀腱(GT)触诊试验阴性,随后抗髋外展试验阴性,显著降低GTPS后验概率,从59%降至14%。在GT触诊试验阳性后抗髋外展试验阳性的患者中,GTPS的验后概率从59%显著转移到96%。结论:磁共振成像对GTPS的诊断价值存在争议。我们已经确定了一个简单的,临床上有用的诊断测试组,以帮助确认或驳斥报告髋关节外侧疼痛的患者存在GTPS。[J]中华体育杂志;2009;31(1):1-24。2023年8月10日。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2023.11890。
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Tests for Assessing Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.","authors":"Rita Kinsella, Adam I Semciw, Lyndon J Hawke, James Stoney, Peter F M Choong, Michelle M Dowsey","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11890","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11890","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of clinical tests that are used to diagnose greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) in clinical practice. <b>DESIGN:</b> Diagnostic test accuracy systematic review with meta-analysis. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, and SPORTDiscus were searched using key words mapped to diagnostic test accuracy for GTPS. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> Studies with published or derivable diagnostic accuracy data were included. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, and certainty of evidence, via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. MetaDTA \"R\" random-effects models were used to summarize individual and pooled data including sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and pretest/posttest probabilities. <b>RESULTS:</b> From a database yield of 858 studies, 23 full texts were assessed. We included 6 studies for review, involving 15 tests and 272 participants (314 hips). Overall certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Meta-analysis of 6 tests revealed sequenced test clusters able to significantly shift pretest-posttest probability for or against a GTPS diagnosis. In people reporting lateral hip pain, a negative gluteal tendon (GT) palpation test followed by a negative resisted hip abduction test significantly reduced the posttest probability of GTPS from 59% to 14%. In those with a positive GT palpation test followed by a positive resisted hip abduction test, the posttest probability of GTPS significantly shifted from 59% to 96%. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> The value of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing GTPS is debated. We have identified a straightforward, clinically useful diagnostic test cluster to help confirm or refute the presence of GTPS in people reporting lateral hip pain. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(1):1-24. Epub 10 August 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11890</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"26-49"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10326949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How to Self-Manage Achilles Tendon Pain and When to See a Health Professional. 如何自我调节跟腱疼痛,以及何时去看专业医生。
IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.9001

When the Achilles tendon begins to feel painful, two common questions people ask is "what should I do to make it feel better?" and "when should I see a healthcare provider for assistance?". This infographic guides people with Achilles tendon pain on how they can self-manage their pain and symptoms, plus tips on when to seek professional advice for tendon pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(1):95. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.9001.

当跟腱开始感到疼痛时,人们常问的两个问题是:"我该怎么做才能让它感觉好些?"以及 "我什么时候应该去看医生寻求帮助?"。本信息图表指导跟腱疼痛患者如何自我控制疼痛和症状,以及何时寻求专业建议治疗跟腱疼痛。DOI:10.2519/JOSPT.2023.9001.
{"title":"How to Self-Manage Achilles Tendon Pain and When to See a Health Professional.","authors":"","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.9001","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.9001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When the Achilles tendon begins to feel painful, two common questions people ask is \"<i>what should I do to make it feel better?</i>\" and \"<i>when should I see a healthcare provider for assistance?</i>\". This infographic guides people with Achilles tendon pain on how they can self-manage their pain and symptoms, plus tips on when to seek professional advice for tendon pain. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(1):95. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.9001</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"54 1","pages":"95"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139075695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1