Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy最新文献

SYNOPSIS: Myofascial pain syndromes (MPSs) affect a significant portion of the population. However, they remain controversial because their etiology, diagnostics, and effect mechanisms rely on theoretical frameworks with limited scientific rigor. This Viewpoint highlights 3 main challenges and proposes solutions: First, diagnosis lacks consistent criteria and is at risk of verification and incorporation biases. Tightened diagnostic criteria and differentiating myofascial pain syndrome from competing conditions will improve accuracy in research and clinical practice. Second, the etiology/pain mechanisms are poorly understood, with symptoms overlapping other conditions. We recommend recording of standardized assessments in national registries including psychological stress and systemic factors to identify distinct phenotypes. Third, the mechanisms behind treatments such as myofascial release and acupuncture are unclear. We advocate for mechanistic clinical trials to uncover how these treatments exert effects. Addressing these challenges will enhance understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of MPS and guide policymakers to fund appropriate research. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(4):1-4. Epub 10 February 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13072.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost-utility analysis of a group physiotherapy intervention, compared to usual care, for musculoskeletal disorders in Canadian military personnel. DESIGN: Economic evaluation alongside a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. METHODS: One hundred and twenty military members presenting with shoulder, knee, ankle, or low back pain were randomized to receive either usual one-on-one physiotherapy care or a group intervention. Cumulative health care costs were prospectively collected over 26 weeks from the perspective of the Canadian Armed Forces. The clinical outcome of the cost-utility analysis was the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) estimated by the ED-5Q-5L (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version) at baseline, 6, 12, and 26 weeks. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated by the cost difference between interventions (in 2023 Canadian dollars [CAD$]) divided by the effect difference. RESULTS: The mean QALY gain was 0.011 in the group intervention, and 0.010 in the usual care. The average cost for a patient was CAD $532 in the group intervention and CAD $599 in the usual care. The ICER (-$67 000/QALY) indicated that the group intervention was cost-effective, as it costs less than usual care while providing comparable effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Group interventions were cost-effective compared to usual care for treating musculoskeletal disorders in military personnel. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(4):1-10. Epub 26 Feb 2025. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2025.12888.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings modified the outcomes of early surgery compared to exercise and education in young patients with meniscal tears. DESIGN: A secondary effect modifier analysis of a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: The primary outcome was change from baseline to 12 months in the mean score of 4 Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales (KOOS₄). Three potential MRI-defined effect modifiers were predefined: (1) the type of meniscal tear (simple vs bucket handle or complex), (2) the meniscus affected (medial vs lateral), and (3) the presence of knee effusion/synovitis (yes/no). We used a linear mixed model to investigate the difference in mean change between the treatment groups, stratified by each of the 3 potential effect modifiers, and estimated the interactions. An adjusted effect difference ≥ 10 points (0-100 scale) was considered clinically relevant. RESULTS: Data from all participants (60 in the surgery group and 61 in the exercise group) were analyzed. The mean (SD) age was 29.7 (6.6) years, and 28% were female. A potential effect modification was observed for knee effusion/synovitis, with its presence implying an increase of the effect of early surgery by 11 points on the KOOS₄ (P = .07). CONCLUSION: Knee effusion/synovitis on MRI potentially modified the treatment effect with a clinically relevant difference in change of the KOOS₄ in patients with effusion/synovitis, favoring early surgery. We found no indication that patients with bucket handle or complex versus simple tears or medial versus lateral tears benefited more from early surgery. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(3):1-11. Epub 30 January 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.12994.

OBJECTIVE: To compare return-to-sport outcomes between females/women/girls and males/men/boys undergoing hip arthroscopy and explore social and structural determinants of health that may influence return to sport. DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Medline, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science from inception to February 2024. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were included if they assessed return to sport after hip arthroscopy and analyzed the influence of sex/gender on return-to-sport outcomes, or reported sex- or gender-stratified return-to-sport rates. DATA SYNTHESIS: We used a random effects model to calculate pooled odds ratios and conducted meta-regressions to compare return-to-sport outcomes between females/women/girls and males/men/boys. RESULTS: Forty-five studies were included, with all pooled results deemed as very low-certainty evidence. Compared to males/men/boys, females/women/girls had inferior return to sport at the same or higher level between 1 and 3 years postoperatively (pooled OR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.81; P = .004), and at any level of sport at >3 years postoperatively (pooled OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.86; P = .014). Sports participation decreased over time, with ~5.5% to 10% lower proportions observed in females/women/girls compared to males/men/boys. The reporting of determinants of returning to sport was minimal, precluding further exploration of their effects. CONCLUSION: Females/women/girls had lower odds of return to sport, especially during longer follow-up periods, than males/men/boys. The lack of reporting of social and structural determinants of health influencing return-to-sport outcomes makes the reasons for this disparity unclear. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(3):1-13. Epub 10 February 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.12813.

BACKGROUND: On-pitch rehabilitation is key to supporting return to sport in elite soccer (football). The control-chaos continuum (CCC) guides practitioners through the sport-specific components of return to sport. There is a need to update the framework with recent research in injury neurophysiology, soccer performance, and coaching science. CLINICAL QUESTION: How do practitioners integrate the insights from injury neurophysiology, soccer performance, and coaching science discussed in part 1 of this 2-part series into an updated version of the CCC, to enhance the planning and execution of on-pitch rehabilitation for elite soccer players? KEY RESULTS: The revised CCC framework emphasizes the design and delivery of progressive training in increasingly chaotic conditions. The updated framework supports practitioners to incorporate elements of visual-cognitive challenges, attentional challenges, decision making, and progression representation of the game model when players are preparing to return to sport. CLINICAL APPLICATION: The updated CCC outlines training progression from High Control, which involves returning to on-pitch linear running, to High Chaos, which simulates the team environment at game speed. The High Chaos phase can be tailored to support players during their reintegration into team training. The model is adaptable for both short- and long-term injuries, integrating physical-cognitive load monitoring and strength and power diagnostics to enhance decision making throughout return to sport. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(3):1-11. Epub 17 January 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13159.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of cervical joint mobilization techniques (JMTs) on pain and disability in adults with nonspecific neck pain. DESIGN: This study is an intervention systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). LITERATURE SEARCH: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and Web of Science databases, including references from other reviews or clinical practice guidelines up to October 16, 2024. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Eligible RCTs evaluated JMTs compared to routine physiotherapy, minimally active interventions, or no treatment. The primary outcome was pain; secondary outcomes were disability, Global Perceived Effect (GPE), quality of life, psychosocial status, and adverse events. DATA SYNTHESIS: Meta-analyses and meta-regression were conducted for pain, disability, and GPE. The risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB 2.0 Tool; the certainty of the evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. We used The Template for the Intervention Description and Replication checklist to evaluate the quality of reporting of interventions delivered. RESULTS: Results from 16 RCTs were pooled (n = 1,157 participants), reporting nonclinically positive results on pain reduction (mean difference [MD] = -0.86 (95% confidence interval [-1.35, -0.36])), disability (MD=-2.11 [-3.31, -0.91]), and GPE (standardized mean difference = 0.11 ([-0.15, 0.37]) and high heterogeneity. The meta-regressions did not identify any covariates associated with the treatment effects. Minor side effects (increased neck pain and headache) were reported. CONCLUSION: There was very low certainty evidence supporting the efficacy of JTMs for reducing pain and improving disability in people with NSNP. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(3):1-20. Epub 12 February 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.12836.

OBJECTIVE: To amplify the voices of people living with atraumatic shoulder pain, their relatives, and health care practitioners, and to establish research questions. DESIGN: A priority-setting study using a modified approach originally formulated by the James Lind Alliance (JLA). METHODS: The process consisted of 6 phases (initiation, consultation, collation, prioritization, validation, and reporting), and included 2 e-surveys and 2 separate virtual workshops. We included people with atraumatic shoulder pain, relatives, health care practitioners managing shoulder pain, and researchers conducting research within the field. RESULTS: Six hundred and eight people participated (n = 383 [63%] patients, n = 213 [35%] health care practitioners, and n = 12 [2%] carers). In the first survey, 297 participants submitted 1080 potential research questions, which were collated into 16 main themes and 94 subthemes and transformed into research questions. These research questions were featured in the second survey, where 290 participants prioritized the questions, resulting in a compilation of the top 25 questions. Based on discussions from 2 separate online workshops with a total of 21 participants, a top-10 list was created. CONCLUSION: In the final priority list, the 3 research questions with the highest ranking were, first, "how can we improve the translation of research into clinical practice?"; second, "how can we prevent atraumatic shoulder pain?"; and third, "who benefits from surgery, and who does not?" J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(3):1-12. Epub 12 February 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13059.

BACKGROUND: On-pitch rehabilitation is a crucial part of returning to sport after injury in elite soccer. The control-chaos continuum (CCC) initially offered a framework for practitioners to plan on-pitch rehabilitation, focusing on physical preparation and sport specificity. However, our experiences with the CCC, combined with recent research in injury neurophysiology, point to a need for an updated model that integrates practice design and physical-cognitive interactions. CLINICAL QUESTION: What are the insights from injury neurophysiology, soccer performance, and coaching science needed to update the CCC and improve the planning, delivery, and progression of on-pitch rehabilitation in elite soccer? KEY RESULTS: Drawing on extensive experience in elite sport, we explain how recent research on neurophysiological recovery from injury, game models, and practice design has been applied to update the CCC and evolve the existing framework. CLINICAL APPLICATION: The evolution of the CCC expands on the original model to enhance planning, delivery, and progression of on-pitch rehabilitation. The updated framework incorporates elements of visual cognition, attentional challenges, decision-making, and progressive representation of the game model to enhance sport-specific preparation for returning to sport. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(2):1-11. Epub 3 January 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13158.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) application procedures (ie, target, thrust, and region) impacted changes in pain and disability for adults with spine pain. DESIGN: Systematic review with network meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: We searched PubMed and Epistemonikos for systematic reviews indexed up to February 2022 and conducted a systematic search of 5 databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL [Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials], PEDro [Physiotherapy Evidence Database], and Index to Chiropractic Literature) from January 1, 2018, to September 12, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from recent systematic reviews and newly identified RCTs published during the review process and employed artificial intelligence to identify potentially relevant articles not retrieved through our electronic database searches. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs of the effects of high-velocity, low-amplitude SMT, compared to other SMT approaches, interventions, or controls, in adults with spine pain. DATA SYNTHESIS: The outcomes were spinal pain intensity and disability measured at short-term (end of treatment) and long-term (closest to 12 months) follow-ups. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using version 2 of the Cochrane RoB tool. Results were presented as network plots, evidence rankings, and league tables. RESULTS: We included 161 RCTs (11 849 participants). Most SMT procedures were equal to clinical guideline interventions and were slightly more effective than other treatments. When comparing inter-SMT procedures, effects were small and not clinically relevant. A general and nonspecific rather than a specific and targeted SMT approach had the highest probability of achieving the largest effects. Results were based on very low- to low-certainty evidence, mainly downgraded owing to large within-study heterogeneity, high RoB, and an absence of direct comparisons. CONCLUSION: There was low-certainty evidence that clinicians could apply SMT according to their preferences and the patients' preferences and comfort. Differences between SMT approaches appear small and likely not clinically relevant. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(2):1-14. Epub 7 January 2025. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2025.12707.

OBJECTIVES: To (1) establish a women's knee health consumer advisory group (CAG) via an evidence-informed process and (2) identify the CAG's research priorities to inform future projects. DESIGN: Mixed-methods priority-setting study. METHODS: The CAG was established, grounded in a participatory action research approach and using the Patient Engagement in Research Framework, to inform a 4-phase process: (1) understand, (2) plan, (3) undertake, and (4) evaluate. We identified the CAG's priorities for knee health research via a mixed-methods approach using the nominal group technique (NGT). We adopted a constructivist epistemology, using reflexive thematic analysis to construct codes and themes inductively. RESULTS: Six women (mean age of 35 years) joined the CAG, generating, reviewing, and discussing 70 ideas during NGT phases 1 to 3. We constructed 14 codes, grouped into 3 key themes: (1) best practice management and support for serious knee injury and rehabilitation, (2) social and gendered factors; and (3) physical, psychological, and personal factors. Voting and ranking (NGT phases 3-6) revealed the CAG's highest priority for future research was "Knowledge of, and access to specialised knee rehabilitation and practitioners." CONCLUSION: Establishing a CAG was an achievable and novel approach to identifying consumer priorities to enhance women's knee health outcomes. Women wanted improved access to information and best-practice care via genuine therapeutic relationships with practitioners who understand the gendered-social rehabilitation environment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(2):1-14. Epub 15 January 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.12869.