首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy最新文献

英文 中文
Effectiveness of Interventions Aimed at Changing Movement Patterns in People With Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review With Network Meta-analysis. 旨在改变髌骨痛患者运动模式的干预措施的有效性:一项基于网络荟萃分析的系统综述。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11956
Guilherme S Nunes, Jênifer de Oliveira, George-Sebastian Iacob, Luis Ulisses Signori, Ane P Diel, Rafaela Schreiner, Matheus Weide Solner

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the effectiveness of interventions for changing movement during weight-bearing functional tasks in people with patellofemoral pain (PFP). DESIGN: Systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA). LITERATURE SEARCH: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception up to May 2023. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials involving people with PFP and nonsurgical, nonpharmacological interventions on task kinematics were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: NMA was conducted for frontal knee movement data, and pairwise meta-analysis was used to pool data when NMA was not possible. Reduced movements were those changes that indicated movements occurring with less amplitude. The GRADE approach was used to grade the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS: Thirty-seven trials were included (n = 1235 participants). Combining knee/hip exercises with internal feedback had the strongest effect on reducing frontal knee movements (standardized mean difference [SMD] from NMA = -2.66; GRADE: moderate evidence). On pairwise comparisons, the same combination of interventions reduced frontal hip movements (SMD = -0.47; GRADE: moderate evidence) and increased sagittal knee movements (SMD = 1.03; GRADE: moderate evidence), with no effects on sagittal hip movements (GRADE: very low evidence), compared to knee/hip exercises alone. There was no effect for single applications of braces on the frontal knee movement (GRADE: very low evidence) and taping on movements of the knee, hip, and ankle (GRADE: very low to low evidence) compared to no intervention. CONCLUSION: Knee/hip exercises combined with internal feedback techniques may change knee and hip movements in people with PFP. The combination of these interventions can reduce frontal knee and hip movements, and can increase sagittal knee movements. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):1-13. Epub 14 September 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11956.

目的:总结髌骨股痛(PFP)患者负重功能任务时改变运动的干预措施的有效性。设计:采用网络荟萃分析(NMA)进行系统评价。文献检索:Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus和Cochrane Library从成立到2023年5月进行检索。研究选择标准:随机对照试验包括PFP患者和非手术、非药物干预任务运动学。数据综合:对膝关节前部运动数据进行NMA,当无法进行NMA时,采用两两荟萃分析合并数据。减少的运动是指那些运动幅度较小的变化。GRADE方法用于对证据的确定性进行分级。结果:纳入37项试验(n = 1235名受试者)。结合膝关节/髋关节运动与内部反馈对减少膝关节前部运动的效果最强(标准化平均差[SMD]从NMA = -2.66;等级:中度证据)。在两两比较中,同样的干预组合减少了髋前部运动(SMD = -0.47;分级:中度证据)和膝关节矢状位运动增加(SMD = 1.03;与单纯的膝关节/髋关节运动相比,对矢状髋关节运动没有影响(GRADE: very low evidence)。与不干预相比,单次应用支架对膝关节前部运动(分级:极低证据)和贴敷对膝关节、髋关节和踝关节运动(分级:极低到低证据)没有影响。结论:膝关节/髋关节运动结合内反馈技术可以改变PFP患者的膝关节和髋关节运动。这些干预措施的组合可以减少膝关节前部和髋关节的运动,并可以增加膝关节矢状位的运动。[J]中华体育杂志,2013;33(1):1-13。Epub 2023年9月14日。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2023.11956。
{"title":"Effectiveness of Interventions Aimed at Changing Movement Patterns in People With Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review With Network Meta-analysis.","authors":"Guilherme S Nunes, Jênifer de Oliveira, George-Sebastian Iacob, Luis Ulisses Signori, Ane P Diel, Rafaela Schreiner, Matheus Weide Solner","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11956","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11956","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To summarize the effectiveness of interventions for changing movement during weight-bearing functional tasks in people with patellofemoral pain (PFP). <b>DESIGN:</b> Systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA). <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception up to May 2023. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> Randomized controlled trials involving people with PFP and nonsurgical, nonpharmacological interventions on task kinematics were included. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> NMA was conducted for frontal knee movement data, and pairwise meta-analysis was used to pool data when NMA was not possible. Reduced movements were those changes that indicated movements occurring with less amplitude. The GRADE approach was used to grade the certainty of the evidence. <b>RESULTS:</b> Thirty-seven trials were included (n = 1235 participants). Combining knee/hip exercises with internal feedback had the strongest effect on reducing frontal knee movements (standardized mean difference [SMD] from NMA = -2.66; GRADE: moderate evidence). On pairwise comparisons, the same combination of interventions reduced frontal hip movements (SMD = -0.47; GRADE: moderate evidence) and increased sagittal knee movements (SMD = 1.03; GRADE: moderate evidence), with no effects on sagittal hip movements (GRADE: very low evidence), compared to knee/hip exercises alone. There was no effect for single applications of braces on the frontal knee movement (GRADE: very low evidence) and taping on movements of the knee, hip, and ankle (GRADE: very low to low evidence) compared to no intervention. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Knee/hip exercises combined with internal feedback techniques may change knee and hip movements in people with PFP. The combination of these interventions can reduce frontal knee and hip movements, and can increase sagittal knee movements. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):1-13. Epub 14 September 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11956</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10224445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preseason Vertical Center of Mass Displacement During Running and Bone Mineral Density Z-Score Are Risk Factors for Bone Stress Injury Risk in Collegiate Cross-country Runners. 季前跑步时的垂直重心位移和骨密度z评分是大学越野跑运动员骨应力损伤风险的危险因素。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11860
Mikel R Joachim, Stephanie A Kliethermes, Bryan C Heiderscheit

OBJECTIVES: To (1) assess relationships between running biomechanics, bone health, and bone stress injuries (BSIs), and (2) determine which variables constitute the most parsimonious BSI risk model among collegiate cross-country runners. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. METHODS: Running gait and bone mineral density (BMD) data from healthy collegiate cross-country runners were collected at preseason over 6 seasons. A generalized estimating equation model with backward selection was used to develop the most parsimonious model for estimating BSI risk, controlling for sex, running speed, and prior BSI. The variables assessed were spatiotemporal, ground reaction force, and joint kinematics, based on previous literature. Quasi-likelihood under the independence model criterion values and R2 values were used to select the best-fitting model. RESULTS: Data from 103 runners were included in the analysis. The best-fitting model included vertical center of mass (COM) displacement and BMD z-score. Injury risk increased with greater vertical COM displacement (unit = 0.5 cm; relative risk [RR] = 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01, 1.29; P = .04) and decreased with greater BMD z-score (unit = 0.5; RR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.95; P = .007). The model performed similarly when step rate was included instead of vertical COM displacement. CONCLUSION: Vertical COM displacement and BMD z-score contributed to the best model for estimating risk the risk of bone stress injury in cross-country runners. Step rate was also an important variable for assessing injury risk. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):1-8. Epub 20 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11860.

目的:(1)评估跑步生物力学、骨骼健康和骨应力损伤(BSI)之间的关系,以及(2)确定哪些变量构成了大学越野跑者中最简约的骨应力伤风险模型。设计:前瞻性、观察性队列研究。方法:在6个赛季的季前赛中,收集来自健康大学越野跑者的跑步步态和骨密度数据。使用具有向后选择的广义估计方程模型来开发用于估计BSI风险、控制性别、跑步速度和先前BSI的最简约模型。根据先前的文献,评估的变量包括时空、地面反作用力和关节运动学。独立性模型下的拟似然性使用标准值和R平方值来选择最佳拟合模型。结果:103名跑步者的数据被纳入分析。最佳拟合模型包括垂直重心(COM)位移和骨密度(BMD)z评分。损伤风险随着COM垂直位移的增加而增加(单位=0.5cm,RR=1.14[95%CI:1.01,1.29],p=0.04),随着BMD z评分的增加而降低(单位=0.5,RR=0.83[95%CI:0.72,0.95],p=0.007)。当包括步进率而不是垂直COM位移时,模型表现类似。结论:垂直COM位移和BMD z评分是评估越野跑者骨应力损伤风险的最佳模型。步进率也是评估受伤风险的一个重要变量。
{"title":"Preseason Vertical Center of Mass Displacement During Running and Bone Mineral Density Z-Score Are Risk Factors for Bone Stress Injury Risk in Collegiate Cross-country Runners.","authors":"Mikel R Joachim, Stephanie A Kliethermes, Bryan C Heiderscheit","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11860","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11860","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVES:</b> To (1) assess relationships between running biomechanics, bone health, and bone stress injuries (BSIs), and (2) determine which variables constitute the most parsimonious BSI risk model among collegiate cross-country runners. <b>DESIGN:</b> Prospective, observational cohort study. <b>METHODS:</b> Running gait and bone mineral density (BMD) data from healthy collegiate cross-country runners were collected at preseason over 6 seasons. A generalized estimating equation model with backward selection was used to develop the most parsimonious model for estimating BSI risk, controlling for sex, running speed, and prior BSI. The variables assessed were spatiotemporal, ground reaction force, and joint kinematics, based on previous literature. Quasi-likelihood under the independence model criterion values and R<sup>2</sup> values were used to select the best-fitting model. <b>RESULTS:</b> Data from 103 runners were included in the analysis. The best-fitting model included vertical center of mass (COM) displacement and BMD z-score. Injury risk increased with greater vertical COM displacement (unit = 0.5 cm; relative risk [RR] = 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01, 1.29; <i>P</i> = .04) and decreased with greater BMD z-score (unit = 0.5; RR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.95; <i>P</i> = .007). The model performed similarly when step rate was included instead of vertical COM displacement. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Vertical COM displacement and BMD z-score contributed to the best model for estimating risk the risk of bone stress injury in cross-country runners. Step rate was also an important variable for assessing injury risk. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):1-8. Epub 20 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11860</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49684347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Up Front and Open? Shrouded in Secrecy? Or Somewhere in Between? A Meta-Research Systematic Review of Open Science Practices in Sport Medicine Research. 在前面和公开,笼罩在秘密中,还是介于两者之间?运动医学研究中开放科学实践的元研究系统综述。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.12016
Garrett S Bullock, Patrick Ward, Franco M Impellizzeri, Stefan Kluzek, Tom Hughes, Charles Hillman, Brian R Waterman, Kerry Danelson, Kaitlin Henry, Emily Barr, Kelsey Healy, Anu M Räisänen, Christina Gomez, Garrett Fernandez, Jakob Wolf, Kristen F Nicholson, Tim Sell, Ryan Zerega, Paula Dhiman, Richard D Riley, Gary S Collins

OBJECTIVE: To investigate open science practices in research published in the top 5 sports medicine journals from May 1, 2022, and October 1, 2022. DESIGN: A meta-research systematic review. LITERATURE SEARCH: Open science practices were searched in MEDLINE. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: We included original scientific research published in one of the identified top 5 sports medicine journals in 2022 as ranked by Clarivate: (1) British Journal of Sports Medicine, (2) Journal of Sport and Health Science, (3) American Journal of Sports Medicine, (4) Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, and (5) Sports Medicine-Open. Studies were excluded if they were systematic reviews, qualitative research, gray literature, or animal or cadaver models. DATA SYNTHESIS: Open science practices were extracted in accordance with the Transparency and Openness Promotion guidelines and patient and public involvement. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-three studies were included. The median number of open science practices in each study was 2, out of a maximum of 12 (range: 0-8; interquartile range: 2). Two hundred thirty-four studies (96%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 94%-99%) provided an author conflict-of-interest statement and 163 (67%, 95% CI: 62%-73%) reported funding. Twenty-one studies (9%, 95% CI: 5%-12%) provided open-access data. Fifty-four studies (22%, 95% CI: 17%-27%) included a data availability statement and 3 (1%, 95% CI: 0%-3%) made code available. Seventy-six studies (32%, 95% CI: 25%-37%) had transparent materials and 30 (12%, 95% CI: 8%-16%) used a reporting guideline. Twenty-eight studies (12%, 95% CI: 8%-16%) were preregistered. Six studies (3%, 95% CI: 1%-4%) published a protocol. Four studies (2%, 95% CI: 0%-3%) reported an analysis plan a priori. Seven studies (3%, 95% CI: 1%-5%) reported patient and public involvement. CONCLUSION: Open science practices in the sports medicine field are extremely limited. The least followed practices were sharing code, data, and analysis plans. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):1-13. Epub 20 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12016.

目的:调查2022年5月1日至2022年10月1日在五大运动医学期刊上发表的研究中的开放科学实践。设计:元研究系统综述文献检索:在MEDLINE中检索开放科学实践。研究选择标准:我们纳入了发表在2022年被Clarivate排名前五的运动医学期刊之一上的原创科学研究((1)《英国运动医学杂志》、(2)《运动与健康科学杂志》、《美国运动医学期刊》、(4)《医学科学运动与锻炼》和(5)《运动医学公开赛》)。如果研究是系统综述、定性研究、灰色文献或动物或尸体模型,则将其排除在外。数据综合:开放科学实践是根据透明和开放促进(TOP)指南以及患者和公众参与(PPI)提取的。结果:纳入243项研究。每项研究中开放科学实践的中位数为2,最多为12(范围:0-8;IQR:2)。234项研究(96%,95%CI:94-99%)提供了作者利益冲突声明,163项研究(67%,95%CI:62-73%)报告了资助情况。21项研究(9%,95%CI:5-12%)提供了开放获取数据。54项研究(22%,95%CI:17-27%)包括数据可用性声明,3项研究(1%,95%CI:0-3%)提供代码。76项研究(32%,95%置信区间:25-37%)采用透明材料,30项研究(12%,95%置信度:8-16)采用报告指南。28项研究(12%,95%置信区间:8-16%)已预先登记。六项研究(3%,95%置信区间:1-4%)发表了一项方案。四项研究(2%,95%置信区间:0-3%)报告了先验分析计划。7项研究(3%,95%置信区间:1-5%)报告患者和公众参与。结论:运动医学领域的开放科学实践极其有限。最少遵循的做法是共享代码、数据和分析计划。
{"title":"Up Front and Open? Shrouded in Secrecy? Or Somewhere in Between? A Meta-Research Systematic Review of Open Science Practices in Sport Medicine Research.","authors":"Garrett S Bullock, Patrick Ward, Franco M Impellizzeri, Stefan Kluzek, Tom Hughes, Charles Hillman, Brian R Waterman, Kerry Danelson, Kaitlin Henry, Emily Barr, Kelsey Healy, Anu M Räisänen, Christina Gomez, Garrett Fernandez, Jakob Wolf, Kristen F Nicholson, Tim Sell, Ryan Zerega, Paula Dhiman, Richard D Riley, Gary S Collins","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.12016","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.12016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To investigate open science practices in research published in the top 5 sports medicine journals from May 1, 2022, and October 1, 2022. <b>DESIGN:</b> A meta-research systematic review. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> Open science practices were searched in MEDLINE. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> We included original scientific research published in one of the identified top 5 sports medicine journals in 2022 as ranked by Clarivate: (1) <i>British Journal of Sports Medicine</i>, (2) <i>Journal of Sport and Health Science</i>, (3) <i>American Journal of Sports Medicine</i>, (4) <i>Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise</i>, and (5) <i>Sports Medicine-Open</i>. Studies were excluded if they were systematic reviews, qualitative research, gray literature, or animal or cadaver models. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> Open science practices were extracted in accordance with the Transparency and Openness Promotion guidelines and patient and public involvement. <b>RESULTS:</b> Two hundred forty-three studies were included. The median number of open science practices in each study was 2, out of a maximum of 12 (range: 0-8; interquartile range: 2). Two hundred thirty-four studies (96%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 94%-99%) provided an author conflict-of-interest statement and 163 (67%, 95% CI: 62%-73%) reported funding. Twenty-one studies (9%, 95% CI: 5%-12%) provided open-access data. Fifty-four studies (22%, 95% CI: 17%-27%) included a data availability statement and 3 (1%, 95% CI: 0%-3%) made code available. Seventy-six studies (32%, 95% CI: 25%-37%) had transparent materials and 30 (12%, 95% CI: 8%-16%) used a reporting guideline. Twenty-eight studies (12%, 95% CI: 8%-16%) were preregistered. Six studies (3%, 95% CI: 1%-4%) published a protocol. Four studies (2%, 95% CI: 0%-3%) reported an analysis plan a priori. Seven studies (3%, 95% CI: 1%-5%) reported patient and public involvement. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Open science practices in the sports medicine field are extremely limited. The least followed practices were sharing code, data, and analysis plans. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):1-13. Epub 20 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12016</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49684348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Heel Pain - Plantar Fasciitis: Revision 2023. 脚后跟疼痛-足底筋膜炎:修订版2023。
IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.0303
Thomas A Koc, Christopher G Bise, Christopher Neville, Dominic Carreira, Robroy L Martin, Christine M McDonough

The Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) has an ongoing effort to create evidence-based practice guidelines for orthopaedic physical therapy management of patients with musculoskeletal impairments described in the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). The purpose of these revised clinical practice guidelines is to review recent peer-reviewed literature and make recommendations related to nonarthritic heel pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):CPG1-CPG39. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0303.

美国物理治疗协会(APTA)骨科分会正在努力为世界卫生组织的国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)中描述的肌肉骨骼损伤患者的骨科物理治疗管理创建循证实践指南。修订临床实践指南的目的是回顾最近同行评议的文献,并提出与非关节炎性足跟疼痛相关的建议。[J] .中华体育杂志,2013;33(12):551 - 557。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2023.0303。
{"title":"Heel Pain - Plantar Fasciitis: Revision 2023.","authors":"Thomas A Koc, Christopher G Bise, Christopher Neville, Dominic Carreira, Robroy L Martin, Christine M McDonough","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.0303","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.0303","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) has an ongoing effort to create evidence-based practice guidelines for orthopaedic physical therapy management of patients with musculoskeletal impairments described in the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). The purpose of these revised clinical practice guidelines is to review recent peer-reviewed literature and make recommendations related to nonarthritic heel pain. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):CPG1-CPG39. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0303</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138464031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pros and Cons of Using Artificial Intelligence Chatbots for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Management. 使用人工智能聊天机器人进行肌肉骨骼康复管理的利弊。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.12000
Giacomo Rossettini, Chad Cook, Alvisa Palese, Paolo Pillastrini, Andrea Turolla

SYNOPSIS: Artificial intelligence (AI), specifically large language models (LLMs), which focus on the interaction between computers and human language, can influence musculoskeletal rehabilitation management. AI chatbots (eg, ChatGPT, Microsoft Bing, and Google Bard) are a form of large language models designed to understand, interpret, and generate text similar to what is produced by humans. Since their release, chatbots have triggered controversy in the international scientific community, including when they have passed university exams, generated credible scientific abstracts, and shown potential for replacing humans in scientific roles. The controversies extend to the field of musculoskeletal rehabilitation. In this Viewpoint, we describe the potential applications and limitations, and recommended actions for education, clinical practice, and research when using AI chatbots for musculoskeletal rehabilitation management, aspects that may have similar implications for the broader health care community. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):1-7. Epub 14 September 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12000.

摘要:人工智能(AI),特别是大语言模型(llm),专注于计算机与人类语言之间的交互,可以影响肌肉骨骼康复管理。人工智能聊天机器人(如ChatGPT、微软必应和b谷歌Bard)是一种大型语言模型,旨在理解、解释和生成类似于人类生成的文本。自发布以来,聊天机器人在国际科学界引发了争议,包括它们通过大学考试、生成可信的科学摘要,以及显示出取代人类科学角色的潜力。争议延伸到肌肉骨骼康复领域。在本观点中,我们描述了人工智能聊天机器人在肌肉骨骼康复管理方面的潜在应用和局限性,并建议在教育、临床实践和研究方面采取行动,这些方面可能对更广泛的医疗保健社区产生类似的影响。[J]中华体育杂志,2013;33(1):1-7。Epub 2023年9月14日。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2023.12000。
{"title":"Pros and Cons of Using Artificial Intelligence Chatbots for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Management.","authors":"Giacomo Rossettini, Chad Cook, Alvisa Palese, Paolo Pillastrini, Andrea Turolla","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.12000","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.12000","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>SYNOPSIS:</b> Artificial intelligence (AI), specifically large language models (LLMs), which focus on the interaction between computers and human language, can influence musculoskeletal rehabilitation management. AI chatbots (eg, ChatGPT, Microsoft Bing, and Google Bard) are a form of large language models designed to understand, interpret, and generate text similar to what is produced by humans. Since their release, chatbots have triggered controversy in the international scientific community, including when they have passed university exams, generated credible scientific abstracts, and shown potential for replacing humans in scientific roles. The controversies extend to the field of musculoskeletal rehabilitation. In this Viewpoint, we describe the potential applications and limitations, and recommended actions for education, clinical practice, and research when using AI chatbots for musculoskeletal rehabilitation management, aspects that may have similar implications for the broader health care community. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):1-7. Epub 14 September 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12000</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10598744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adding Brief Pain Science or Ergonomics Messages to Guideline Advice Did Not Increase Feelings of Reassurance in People With Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Experiment. 在指南建议中添加简短的疼痛科学或人体工程学信息并不能增加急性腰痛患者的安心感:一项随机实验。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.12090
Giovanni E Ferreira, Joshua R Zadro, Adrian C Traeger, Caitlin P Jones, Courtney A West, Mary O'Keeffe, Hazel Jenkins, James McAuley, Christopher G Maher

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of adding pain science or ergonomics messages to guideline advice on feelings of reassurance and management intentions among people with acute low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: Three-arm parallel-group randomized experiment. METHODS: We recruited people with acute LBP (pain for ≤6 weeks) to participate in an online experiment. Participants were randomized at a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three groups: guideline advice alone or guideline advice with the addition of brief pain science or ergonomics messages. The intervention was delivered via prerecorded videos in all 3 groups. Coprimary outcomes were reassurance that (1) no serious condition is causing LBP and (2) continuing with daily activities is safe. Secondary outcomes were perceived risk of developing chronic pain, management intentions (bed rest, see a health professional, see a specialist, and imaging), credibility, and relevance of the advice in addressing the participant's concerns. RESULTS: Two thousand two hundred ninety-seven responses (99.3% of 2,313 randomized) were analyzed. Adding brief pain science or ergonomics messages to guideline advice did not change reassurance that LBP was not caused by serious disease. The addition of ergonomics advice provided worse reassurance that it is safe to continue with daily activities compared to guideline advice (mean difference [MD], -0.33; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.53). There was no difference between groups on management intentions. CONCLUSION: Adding pain science or ergonomics messages to guideline advice did not increase reassurance or change management intentions in people with acute LBP. Ergonomics messages may lead to reduced feelings of reassurance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12)1-11. Epub 26 September 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12090.

目的:研究在指南建议中添加疼痛科学或工效学信息对急性腰痛(LBP)患者的安心感和管理意图的影响。设计:三臂平行组随机实验。方法:我们招募了急性LBP(疼痛≤6周)患者参加在线实验。参与者以1:1:1的比例随机分为三组:单独的指南建议,或添加简短疼痛科学或人体工程学信息的指南建议。三组患者均通过预先录制的视频进行干预。共同的主要结果是保证(i)没有严重的情况导致LBP,以及(ii)继续进行日常活动是安全的。次要结果是发展为慢性疼痛的感知风险、管理意图(卧床休息、看健康专业人员、看专家和成像)、可信度以及解决参与者担忧的建议的相关性。结果:分析了2297个应答(2313个随机分组中的99.3%)。在指南建议中添加简短的疼痛科学或人体工程学信息并没有改变LBP不是由严重疾病引起的保证。与指南建议相比,添加人体工程学建议提供了更差的保证,即继续进行日常活动是安全的(平均差异[MD]:-0.33,95%CI 0.13至0.53)。两组在管理意图方面没有差异。结论:在指南建议中加入疼痛科学或工效学信息并不能增加急性LBP患者的安全感或改变管理意图。符合人体工程学的信息可能会减少安心感。
{"title":"Adding Brief Pain Science or Ergonomics Messages to Guideline Advice Did Not Increase Feelings of Reassurance in People With Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Experiment.","authors":"Giovanni E Ferreira, Joshua R Zadro, Adrian C Traeger, Caitlin P Jones, Courtney A West, Mary O'Keeffe, Hazel Jenkins, James McAuley, Christopher G Maher","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.12090","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.12090","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To investigate the effects of adding pain science or ergonomics messages to guideline advice on feelings of reassurance and management intentions among people with acute low back pain (LBP). <b>DESIGN:</b> Three-arm parallel-group randomized experiment. <b>METHODS:</b> We recruited people with acute LBP (pain for ≤6 weeks) to participate in an online experiment. Participants were randomized at a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three groups: guideline advice alone or guideline advice with the addition of brief pain science or ergonomics messages. The intervention was delivered via prerecorded videos in all 3 groups. Coprimary outcomes were reassurance that (1) no serious condition is causing LBP and (2) continuing with daily activities is safe. Secondary outcomes were perceived risk of developing chronic pain, management intentions (bed rest, see a health professional, see a specialist, and imaging), credibility, and relevance of the advice in addressing the participant's concerns. <b>RESULTS:</b> Two thousand two hundred ninety-seven responses (99.3% of 2,313 randomized) were analyzed. Adding brief pain science or ergonomics messages to guideline advice did not change reassurance that LBP was not caused by serious disease. The addition of ergonomics advice provided worse reassurance that it is safe to continue with daily activities compared to guideline advice (mean difference [MD], -0.33; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.53). There was no difference between groups on management intentions. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Adding pain science or ergonomics messages to guideline advice did not increase reassurance or change management intentions in people with acute LBP. Ergonomics messages may lead to reduced feelings of reassurance. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12)1-11. Epub 26 September 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12090</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41179093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Interpretation Thresholds at 3 and 12 Months After Arthroscopic Meniscal Surgery. What Changes, and What Stays the Same? 关节镜半月板手术后3个月和12个月的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分解释阈值。什么改变了,什么保持不变?
IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11993
Lina Holm Ingelsrud, Berend Terluin, Jonas Bloch Thorlund, Julie Rønne Pedersen, Ewa M Roos

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the change in minimal important change (MIC), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and treatment failure (TF) thresholds for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) from 3 to 12 months following arthroscopic meniscus surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We included patients from the Knee Arthroscopy Cohort Southern Denmark who had meniscus surgery between 2013 and 2015. We calculated the interpretation threshold values for MIC, PASS, and TF using an anchor-based adjusted predictive modeling method. Thresholds at 3 and 12 months postoperatively were compared to evaluate changes over time. RESULTS: The proportions of people who reported a clinically relevant improvement, or their symptoms being acceptable, increased by 10% to 15% points from 3 to 12 months after surgery. MIC thresholds for the 5 KOOS subscales remained stable from 3 to 12 months with statistically nonsignificant differences (95% confidence intervals) ranging from -0.3 (-3.0, 2.6) to -2.4 (-6.1, 1.3). All PASS thresholds except for quality of life (QOL) decreased by -6.5 (-11.8, -1.5) to -3.7 (-7.1, -0.4) points, indicating that higher symptom levels were accepted at 12 months. In contrast, the proportion reporting their treatment to have failed remained stable over time (19% and 17%). For QOL, a 7.4 (2.0, 13.2) higher TF threshold at 12 months suggested that improved QOL was required to not consider that the treatment had failed. CONCLUSION: More patients reported being improved at 1 year compared to at 3 months following meniscus surgery. The KOOS MIC thresholds were stable over time, whereas time-specific PASS values should be applied after meniscus surgery. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):685-702. Epub 3 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11993.

目的:评估关节镜半月板手术后3-12个月内膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)的最小重要变化(MIC)、患者可接受症状状态(PASS)和治疗失败(TF)阈值的变化。设计:回顾性队列研究。方法:我们纳入了2013年至2015年间接受半月板手术的丹麦南部膝关节镜组患者。我们使用基于锚的调整预测建模方法计算了MIC、PASS和TF的解释阈值。比较术后3个月和12个月的阈值,以评估随时间的变化。结果:手术后3至12个月,报告临床相关改善或症状可接受的人数比例增加了10-15%。五个KOOS分量表的MIC阈值在3-12个月内保持稳定,统计学上无显著差异(95%置信区间),范围从-0.3(-3.0;2.6)到-2.4(-6.1;1.3)。除生活质量外,所有PASS阈值均下降了-6.5(-11.8;-1.5)到-3.7(-7.1;-0.4)分,表明在12个月时接受了更高的症状水平。相比之下,报告治疗失败的比例随着时间的推移保持稳定(19%和17%)。对于生活质量,在12个月时TF阈值高7.4(2.0;13.2),表明需要改善生活质量,而不考虑治疗失败。结论:与半月板手术后3个月相比,更多的患者报告在一年内得到改善。随着时间的推移,KOOS MIC阈值是稳定的,而半月板手术后应应用特定时间的PASS值。
{"title":"Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Interpretation Thresholds at 3 and 12 Months After Arthroscopic Meniscal Surgery. What Changes, and What Stays the Same?","authors":"Lina Holm Ingelsrud,&nbsp;Berend Terluin,&nbsp;Jonas Bloch Thorlund,&nbsp;Julie Rønne Pedersen,&nbsp;Ewa M Roos","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11993","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11993","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To evaluate the change in minimal important change (MIC), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and treatment failure (TF) thresholds for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) from 3 to 12 months following arthroscopic meniscus surgery. <b>DESIGN:</b> Retrospective cohort study. <b>METHODS:</b> We included patients from the Knee Arthroscopy Cohort Southern Denmark who had meniscus surgery between 2013 and 2015. We calculated the interpretation threshold values for MIC, PASS, and TF using an anchor-based adjusted predictive modeling method. Thresholds at 3 and 12 months postoperatively were compared to evaluate changes over time. <b>RESULTS:</b> The proportions of people who reported a clinically relevant improvement, or their symptoms being acceptable, increased by 10% to 15% points from 3 to 12 months after surgery. MIC thresholds for the 5 KOOS subscales remained stable from 3 to 12 months with statistically nonsignificant differences (95% confidence intervals) ranging from -0.3 (-3.0, 2.6) to -2.4 (-6.1, 1.3). All PASS thresholds except for quality of life (QOL) decreased by -6.5 (-11.8, -1.5) to -3.7 (-7.1, -0.4) points, indicating that higher symptom levels were accepted at 12 months. In contrast, the proportion reporting their treatment to have failed remained stable over time (19% and 17%). For QOL, a 7.4 (2.0, 13.2) higher TF threshold at 12 months suggested that improved QOL was required to not consider that the treatment had failed. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> More patients reported being improved at 1 year compared to at 3 months following meniscus surgery. The KOOS MIC thresholds were stable over time, whereas time-specific PASS values should be applied after meniscus surgery. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):685-702. Epub 3 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11993</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41150639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relationships Between Common Preseason Screening Measures and Dance-Related Injuries in Preprofessional Ballet Dancers. 季前常见筛查措施与职业前芭蕾舞演员舞蹈相关损伤之间的关系。
IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11835
Meghan L Critchley, Stephan Bonfield, Reed Ferber, Kati Pasanen, Sarah J Kenny

OBJECTIVE: To examine modifiable and nonmodifiable factors for associations with dance-related injury among preprofessional ballet dancers over 5 academic years. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Full-time preprofessional ballet dancers (n = 452; 399 female; median age [range], 15 years [11-21]) participated across 5 academic years at a vocational school. Participants completed baseline screening and online weekly injury questionnaires including dance exposure (hours/week). Zero-inflated Poisson regression models were used to examine associations between potential risk factors measured at baseline and self-reported dance-related injury. RESULTS: In count model coefficients, left one leg standing score (log coefficient estimate, -0.249 [95% CI: -0.478, -0.02]; P = .033) and right unipedal dynamic balance time (log coefficient estimate, -0.0294 [95% CI: -0.048, -0.01]; P>.001) carried a protective effect with increased years of training when adjusted for Athletic Coping Skills Inventory (ACSI) score. A significant association was found for left unipedal dynamic balance time and dance-related injury (log coefficient estimate, 0.013 [95% CI: 0.000, 0.026]; P = .045) when adjusted for years of training and ACSI score. There were no significant associations between dance-related injury and ankle and hip range of motion, active straight leg raise, or Y Balance Test measures. CONCLUSION: When adjusted for years of previous dance training and psychological coping skills, there was a significant association between limb-specific lumbopelvic control and dynamic balance tasks, as well as self-reported dance-related injury in preprofessional ballet. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):703-711. Epub 3 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11835.

目的:在五个学年的职业前芭蕾舞演员中,检验与舞蹈相关损伤相关的可改变和不可改变因素。设计:前瞻性队列研究方法:全职职前芭蕾舞演员[n=452;399名女性,中位(范围)年龄:15岁(11-21)]参加职业学校的五个学年。参与者完成了基线筛查和每周在线伤害问卷调查,包括舞蹈暴露(小时/周)。使用零膨胀泊松回归模型来检查基线测量的潜在风险因素与自我报告的舞蹈相关损伤之间的相关性。结果:在计数模型系数中,当调整运动应对技能量表(ACSI)得分时,左侧单腿站立得分[对数系数估计值:-0.249(95%CI:-0.478,-0.02);p=0.033]和右侧单足动态平衡时间[对数系数评估值:-0.0294(95%CI:-0.048,-0.01);p>0.001]随着训练年限的增加而具有保护作用。经多年训练和ACSI评分调整后,发现左单足动平衡时间与舞蹈相关损伤显著相关[对数系数估计值:0.013(95%置信区间:0.000,0.026);p=0.045]。与舞蹈相关的损伤与踝关节和髋关节的活动范围、主动直腿抬高或Y平衡测试指标之间没有显著关联。结论:经过多年的舞蹈训练和心理应对技能调整后,在专业前芭蕾舞中,肢体特定的腰痛控制和动态平衡任务与自我报告的舞蹈相关损伤之间存在显著关联。
{"title":"Relationships Between Common Preseason Screening Measures and Dance-Related Injuries in Preprofessional Ballet Dancers.","authors":"Meghan L Critchley,&nbsp;Stephan Bonfield,&nbsp;Reed Ferber,&nbsp;Kati Pasanen,&nbsp;Sarah J Kenny","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11835","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11835","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To examine modifiable and nonmodifiable factors for associations with dance-related injury among preprofessional ballet dancers over 5 academic years. <b>DESIGN:</b> Prospective cohort study. <b>METHODS:</b> Full-time preprofessional ballet dancers (n = 452; 399 female; median age [range], 15 years [11-21]) participated across 5 academic years at a vocational school. Participants completed baseline screening and online weekly injury questionnaires including dance exposure (hours/week). Zero-inflated Poisson regression models were used to examine associations between potential risk factors measured at baseline and self-reported dance-related injury. <b>RESULTS:</b> In count model coefficients, left one leg standing score (log coefficient estimate, -0.249 [95% CI: -0.478, -0.02]; <i>P</i> = .033) and right unipedal dynamic balance time (log coefficient estimate, -0.0294 [95% CI: -0.048, -0.01]; <i>P</i>>.001) carried a protective effect with increased years of training when adjusted for Athletic Coping Skills Inventory (ACSI) score. A significant association was found for left unipedal dynamic balance time and dance-related injury (log coefficient estimate, 0.013 [95% CI: 0.000, 0.026]; <i>P</i> = .045) when adjusted for years of training and ACSI score. There were no significant associations between dance-related injury and ankle and hip range of motion, active straight leg raise, or Y Balance Test measures. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> When adjusted for years of previous dance training and psychological coping skills, there was a significant association between limb-specific lumbopelvic control and dynamic balance tasks, as well as self-reported dance-related injury in preprofessional ballet. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):703-711. Epub 3 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11835</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41122766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Asking the Right Question Is Key to Getting a Valuable Answer. 提出正确的问题是获得有价值答案的关键。
IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.0204
Matthew S Tenan

Letter to the Editor-in-Chief in response to JOSPT article "The Relationship Between Neck Strength and Sports-Related Concussion in Team Sports: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis" by Garrett JM et al. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):726. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0204.

致主编的信,以回应JOSPT的文章“团队运动中颈部力量与运动相关脑震荡之间的关系:Meta分析的系统综述”,作者Garrett JM et al.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):726。doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0204。
{"title":"Asking the Right Question Is Key to Getting a Valuable Answer.","authors":"Matthew S Tenan","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.0204","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.0204","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Letter to the Editor-in-Chief in response to <i>JOSPT</i> article \"The Relationship Between Neck Strength and Sports-Related Concussion in Team Sports: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis\" by Garrett JM et al. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):726. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0204</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71428568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply to "Asking the Right Question Is Key to Getting a Valuable Answer". 回答“提出正确的问题是获得有价值答案的关键”。
IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.0204-R
Joel M Garrett, Kerry Peek, Daniel J Hoek, Marco Mastrorocco, Thomas B McGuckian

Author response to the JOSPT Letter to the Editor-in-Chief "Asking the Right Question is Key to Getting a Valuable Answer" J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):726-727. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0204-R.

作者对JOSPT致主编的信“提出正确的问题是获得有价值答案的关键”的回应J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):726-727.doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0204-R。
{"title":"Reply to \"Asking the Right Question Is Key to Getting a Valuable Answer\".","authors":"Joel M Garrett,&nbsp;Kerry Peek,&nbsp;Daniel J Hoek,&nbsp;Marco Mastrorocco,&nbsp;Thomas B McGuckian","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.0204-R","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.0204-R","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Author response to the <i>JOSPT</i> Letter to the Editor-in-Chief \"Asking the Right Question is Key to Getting a Valuable Answer\" <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):726-727. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0204-R</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71428570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1