Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy最新文献

OBJECTIVES: To (1) investigate whether different labels for neck pain after a motor vehicle crash (MVC) influenced recovery expectations and management beliefs, (2) explore reasons for low recovery expectations and greater likelihood for lodging a claim, and (3) explore the moderating effect of neck pain history and sociodemographic characteristics. DESIGN: Online randomized experiment with nested qualitative content analysis. METHODS: We randomized 2229 participants from the general population (mean age: 46.7 ± 17.5 years; 72.4% females; 66% with previous or current neck pain; 10% with an MVC experience) to read 1 of 5 scenarios describing a patient with neck pain after an MVC, each was labeled as whiplash injury, whiplash-associated disorder, posttraumatic neck pain, neck pain, or neck strain. The primary outcome was recovery expectations, rated on a 0- to 10-point scale. RESULTS: Participants allocated to whiplash-associated disorder or neck pain had lower recovery expectations than those allocated to neck strain (adjusted mean difference [95% confidence interval]: -0.5 [-0.9 to -0.1] for both comparisons). Whiplash-associated disorder led to more recovery uncertainty, while neck pain led to greater doubt about the health care provider. Most secondary outcomes showed significant but small differences. Participants allocated to neck strain were less inclined to claim than those allocated to whiplash-associated disorder or whiplash injury due to less perceived need for financial support. Neck pain history moderated labeling effects on recovery expectations; household income moderated the claim intention. CONCLUSIONS: Labels for neck pain after an MVC influenced recovery expectations and management preferences. The clinical relevance of the small effects was unclear. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(11):1-10. Epub 5 September 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12590.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if current exercise interventions were effective at improving physical activity (PA) levels and/or cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in postpartum women. DESIGN: Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus were searched from inception to March 2024. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Participants: postpartum women; intervention: exercise; control: standard care; outcomes: PA levels and/or CRF. DATA SYNTHESIS: Random effects meta-analysis using standardized mean differences (SMDs). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies - Intervention (ROBINS-I). RESULTS: A total of 6041 studies were screened, and 29 were eligible for inclusion. Nineteen studies with adequate control data included outcomes related to PA levels (n = 12) or CRF (n = 7) and were pooled in meta-analyses. There was a small to moderate improvement in CRF (SMD, 0.65; 95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.20, 1.10; I² = 61%). There was no improvement in PA levels (SMD, -0.13; 95% CI: -0.53, 0.26; I² = 90%). Frequency, intensity, type, and time of the exercise interventions varied. Twenty-three studies were at high or serious risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Postpartum exercise interventions may improve CRF but have an unclear effect on PA levels. Despite numerous exercise interventions to improve health outcomes postpartum, parameters were inconsistent. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(11):687-701. Epub 9 October 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12666.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether improvements in forward bending were related to improvements in pain and disability in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) who were undergoing Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT). DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study. METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-one participants with CLBP received CFT. Forward bending was assessed at each treatment session over 13 weeks (an average of 4.3 timepoints per participant [range, 1-8]). Spinal range of motion (ROM) and velocity were recorded using 2 inertial measurement units located at T12 and S2. Participants reported (1) average pain intensity (0-10 scale) (pain) and (2) pain-related activity limitation (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [disability]) via online questionnaires at 0, 3, 6, and 13 weeks. Multivariate multilevel models were used to evaluate associations between individual rates of change over time for 3 spinal movement measures (trunk velocity, trunk ROM, lumbar ROM) and pain/disability. RESULTS: Strong correlations were observed for increased trunk velocity with reduced pain (r = -0.81; 95% CI: -0.98, -0.05) and with reduced disability (r = -0.77; 95% CI: -0.95, -0.22). Moderate correlations were observed between increased trunk ROM with reduced pain (r = -0.37; 95% CI: -0.67, 0.04) and with reduced disability (r = -0.32; 95% CI: -0.6, 0.03). There was no evidence of association between changes in lumbar ROM and pain (r = -0.46; 95% CI: -0.90, 0.44) or disability (r = -0.01; 95% CI: -0.56, 0.55). CONCLUSION: Reductions in pain and disability were strongly correlated with increased trunk velocity in people with CLBP who were undergoing CFT. These findings are consistent with CFT that explicitly trains "nonprotective" spinal movement. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(11):721-731. Epub 7 October 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12727.

SYNOPSIS: A sports injury need not imply objective or subjective signs of tissue damage. Pain and impaired performance can count as an injury, which is often measured by the inability to play or participate in training and/or competition. Pain in the presence, and in the absence, of objective tissue damage is common in sports, but there are important differences in how sports-related pain and injury are managed, such as whether return to sport should be time and/or pain contingent. This editorial proposes a pragmatic definition of sports-related pain to support clinicians with a semantic and practical description of what sports-related pain is, and the implications for helping athletes manage pain in the absence of tissue injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(11):681-686. Epub 21 October 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12462.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare sensory processing measures in people attending specialist orthopaedic consultation for management of persistent shoulder pain with control participants. The secondary objective was to compare the groups' sociodemographic, clinical, general health and lifestyle, and psychological characteristics. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional. METHODS: Participants with shoulder pain for ≥3 months, who attended a public hospital orthopaedic department (n = 119), and community participants without shoulder pain (n = 44) underwent a standardized quantitative sensory testing protocol, measuring pressure pain threshold, temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation. Sociodemographic, clinical, general health and lifestyle, and psychological characteristics were also collected. RESULTS: Participants with shoulder pain had significantly lower pressure pain thresholds at all sites (ie, local and widespread mechanical hyperalgesia) and significantly decreased conditioned pain modulation effect (ie, descending inhibition of nociception) than control participants. There was no significant difference between groups for temporal summation. Participants with shoulder pain had decreased general health and function, less healthy lifestyles, and poorer psychological health compared with controls. CONCLUSION: People referred to specialist orthopaedic care for management of persistent shoulder pain had clinical signs of altered sensory processing and poor health outcomes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(10):1-10. Epub 25 July 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12512.

SYNOPSIS: In 2025, JOSPT will continue its mission to enhance research in the field of musculoskeletal rehabilitation. JOSPT aims to support authors who are working to advance the research methods applied to answer clinical questions in the musculoskeletal rehabilitation field. Using the most robust methods helps authors ensure their studies can have immediate impact on health policies and clinical practice. With this editorial, we introduce a new gold open-access journal, JOSPT Methods, where research will be available to read for free, immediately upon publication. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(10):1-3. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12972.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how a global rating of change (GROC) score corresponds to change in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales in people with patellofemoral pain (PFP). DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from 3 clinical trials. METHODS: Four hundred ninety adolescents (10-18 years old) and adults (19-40 years old) with PFP completed KOOS (5 subscales, 0-100) at baseline and 3-month follow-up as well as GROC at 3-month follow-up. GROC category descriptors were mapped to 5 categories: worse, no change, a bit better, better, and much better. Gaussian approximation was then used to calculate the change in KOOS scores for each GROC category. RESULTS: Due to overlap between KOOS scores in "no change" and "a bit better," all analyses were performed on 4 categories. For all KOOS subscales, patients who reported being "worse" had negative KOOS scale change scores (≤ -2); patients reporting "no change" had KOOS scale change scores that ranged from -5 to 14; and patients feeling "better" or "much better" had positive KOOS scale change scores that ranged from 4 to 26 and ≥16, respectively. CONCLUSION: When patients with PFP reported feeling "worse," "better," or "much better," there was a small-to-substantial change across the different KOOS scales. This is in contrast to no difference between reporting "a bit better" or "no change" in KOOS. When patients say they feel a little better, clinicians should be less confident about whether change has truly occurred. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(10):657-671. Epub 25 July 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12120.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a single session of education and exercise compared with multiple sessions of a multimodal physiotherapy intervention for adults with spinal disorders in an advanced practice physiotherapy specialized spine model of care. DESIGN: Pragmatic randomized controlled trial. METHODS: We randomized patients with spinal disorders, who were referred for a spinal surgery consultation and triaged as nonsurgical cases by an advanced practice physiotherapist, to a single session of education and prescription of an exercise program (n = 52) or multiple sessions (6 in total) of a multimodal physiotherapy intervention (n = 54). The primary outcomes were the short form Brief Pain Inventory pain severity scale (BPI-S) and the Brief Pain Inventory pain interference scale (BPI-I), and secondary outcomes included disability, quality of life, catastrophization, and satisfaction. Linear mixed models were used to assess differences between groups across time points at 6, 12, and 26 weeks. RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences on the BPI-S and only a significant improvement at 6 weeks on the BPI-I in the multiple-session group (mean difference: -0.96/10; 95% CI, -1.87 to -0.05). There were no other statistically significant differences between groups, except for satisfaction where participants in the multiple-session group reported statistically significantly greater satisfaction on the 9-item Visit-Specific Satisfaction Questionnaire and the MedRisk questionnaire. Both groups saw significant improvements over time on all outcomes except for the BPI-S. CONCLUSION: Adding supervised multimodal physiotherapy sessions did not result in better clinical outcomes when compared to a single session of education and exercise. Patients were more satisfied with the multiple-session approach. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(10):1-13. Epub 9 September 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12618.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) return-to-play (RTP) factors and proportions across all National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) sports. DESIGN: Systematic review with prognosis and etiology components. LITERATURE SEARCH: Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases using terms related to RTP, ACLR, and NCAA for articles published up to June 30, 2023. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Articles were included if RTP proportions or factors affecting RTP were reported and if the study population included NCAA collegiate athletes recovering from an ACLR. DATA SYNTHESIS: The proportion represents the total number of athletes who returned to play after ACLR over the total number of ACLR athletes from each cohort. The cumulative proportion represents the aggregated total from each included study. When eligibility information was available (ie, athletes in their final year of eligibility), RTP proportions were adjusted. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the study quality and scored by 2 raters. RESULTS: Nine studies were included. RTP criteria varied across the studies. Proportions of RTP ranged from 69% to 92%, with a cumulative RTP proportion after ACLR of 84% (628/745). The primary factors associated with the proportion of RTP were scholarship status, competitive eligibility remaining, depth chart position, and surgical graft type. CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative proportion of RTP was 84% and was associated with patient-specific and operative factors. Psychological and functional factors were not routinely reported, and rehabilitation protocols were unknown. Data were not explicitly available for any athletes outside of Division I. The criteria for RTP after ACLR varied. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(10):1-9. Epub 10 September 2024. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.12483.

SYNOPSIS: This Viewpoint provides practical guidance for early-career musculoskeletal clinicians who are navigating the complexities of clinical practice. Key themes are embracing uncertainty, seeing and treating the whole person, avoiding judgemental mindsets, embracing shared decision-making, focusing on building strong therapeutic relationships and finding a work-related niche that resonates with one's own passions and strengths. We encourage clinicians to consume information carefully in an era of social media health influencers, and suggest ways of accurately identifying reliable sources of information. We do not presume to inoculate against all challenges that clinicians will encounter. Instead, we strive to help early-career clinicians navigate potential friction points in clinic and research based on our collective experience. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(10):621-624. Epub 17 September 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12676.