Patricia A Ganz,Reena S Cecchini,Julia R White,Frank A Vicini,Douglas W Arthur,Rachel A Rabinovitch,Robert R Kuske,Thomas B Julian,David S Parda,Michael F Scheier,Kathryn A Winter,Soonmyung Paik,Henry M Kuerer,Laura A Vallow,Lori J Pierce,Eleftherios P Mamounas,Beryl McCormick,Harry D Bear,Isabelle Germain,Gregory S Gustafson,Linda Grossheim,Ivy A Petersen,Richard S Hudes,Walter J Curran,Norman Wolmark
PURPOSENRG Oncology (NRG)/NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 compared whole-breast irradiation (WBI) to accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI). APBI was not equivalent to WBI in local tumor control. Secondary outcome was Quality-of-life (QOL).METHODSThe QOL sub-study used validated self-report questionnaires including the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS) and SF-36 vitality scale. Assessments occurred: before randomization, at treatment completion (chemotherapy or radiotherapy), 4-weeks later, at 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-months. Primary aims: cosmesis change equivalency (baseline to 3 years; a priori margin of equivalence 0.4 standard deviations) and fatigue change superiority (baseline to end-of-treatment (EOT)) for APBI vs WBI, by patient groups treated with or without chemotherapy when appropriate.RESULTSFrom 3/21/05-5/25/09, 975 patients enrolled in this sub-study; 950 had follow-up data. APBI had 3-year cosmesis equivalent to WBI (95%CI,-0.0001-0.16; equivalence margin -0.22-0.22) in all patients. The APBI group without chemotherapy had less EOT fatigue (p = .011; mean score APBI 63 vs WBI 59); APBI group receiving chemotherapy had worse EOT fatigue (p = .011; APBI 43 vs WBI 49). The APBI group reported less pain (BCTOS) at EOT (WBI 2.29 vs APBI 1.97), but worse pain at 3-years (WBI 1.62 vs APBI 1.71). APBI patients reported greater convenience of care than with WBI and reported less symptom severity at EOT and 4-weeks later.CONCLUSIONCosmetic outcomes were similar for APBI and WBI groups, with small statistically significant differences in other outcomes that varied over time. Differences in fatigue and other symptoms appeared to resolve by ≥ 6 months. APBI may be preferred by some patients, for whom extended treatment is burdensome.
{"title":"Quality-of-Life Outcomes from NRG/NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413: Whole-breast Irradiation vs Accelerated Partial-breast Irradiation after Breast Conserving Surgery.","authors":"Patricia A Ganz,Reena S Cecchini,Julia R White,Frank A Vicini,Douglas W Arthur,Rachel A Rabinovitch,Robert R Kuske,Thomas B Julian,David S Parda,Michael F Scheier,Kathryn A Winter,Soonmyung Paik,Henry M Kuerer,Laura A Vallow,Lori J Pierce,Eleftherios P Mamounas,Beryl McCormick,Harry D Bear,Isabelle Germain,Gregory S Gustafson,Linda Grossheim,Ivy A Petersen,Richard S Hudes,Walter J Curran,Norman Wolmark","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae219","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae219","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSENRG Oncology (NRG)/NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 compared whole-breast irradiation (WBI) to accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI). APBI was not equivalent to WBI in local tumor control. Secondary outcome was Quality-of-life (QOL).METHODSThe QOL sub-study used validated self-report questionnaires including the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS) and SF-36 vitality scale. Assessments occurred: before randomization, at treatment completion (chemotherapy or radiotherapy), 4-weeks later, at 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-months. Primary aims: cosmesis change equivalency (baseline to 3 years; a priori margin of equivalence 0.4 standard deviations) and fatigue change superiority (baseline to end-of-treatment (EOT)) for APBI vs WBI, by patient groups treated with or without chemotherapy when appropriate.RESULTSFrom 3/21/05-5/25/09, 975 patients enrolled in this sub-study; 950 had follow-up data. APBI had 3-year cosmesis equivalent to WBI (95%CI,-0.0001-0.16; equivalence margin -0.22-0.22) in all patients. The APBI group without chemotherapy had less EOT fatigue (p = .011; mean score APBI 63 vs WBI 59); APBI group receiving chemotherapy had worse EOT fatigue (p = .011; APBI 43 vs WBI 49). The APBI group reported less pain (BCTOS) at EOT (WBI 2.29 vs APBI 1.97), but worse pain at 3-years (WBI 1.62 vs APBI 1.71). APBI patients reported greater convenience of care than with WBI and reported less symptom severity at EOT and 4-weeks later.CONCLUSIONCosmetic outcomes were similar for APBI and WBI groups, with small statistically significant differences in other outcomes that varied over time. Differences in fatigue and other symptoms appeared to resolve by ≥ 6 months. APBI may be preferred by some patients, for whom extended treatment is burdensome.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142165924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexander G Goglia,Mohammed Alshalalfa,Anwar Khan,Danielle R Isakov,Helen Y Hougen,Nishwant Swami,Jasmine Kannikal,Sean M Mcbride,Daniel R Gomez,Sanoj Punnen,Paul L Nguyen,Puneeth Iyengar,Emmanuel S Antonarakis,Brandon A Mahal,Edward Christopher Dee
INTRODUCTIONAlterations in forkhead box A1 (FOXA1), a pioneer transcription factor, are associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer (BC) and prostate cancer (PC). We characterized FOXA1 genomic alterations and their clinical impacts in a large pan-cancer cohort from the AACR GENIE database.METHODSFOXA1 alterations were characterized across >87,000 samples from >30 cancer types for primary and metastatic tumors alongside patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. FOXA1 alterations were queried in the MSK-MET cohort (a GENIE subset), allowing definition of hazard ratios (HRs) and survival estimates based on Cox proportional hazard models.RESULTSFOXA1 was altered in 1,869 samples (2.1%), with distinct patterns across different cancers: PC enriched with indel-inframe alterations, BC with missense mutations, and lung cancers with copy number (CN) amplifications.Of 74,715 samples with FOXA1 CN profiles, amplification was detected in 834 (1.1%). Amplification was most common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 3% in primary; 6% in metastatic) and small cell lung cancer (4.1% primary; 3.5% metastatic), followed by BC (2% primary; 1.6% metastatic) and PC (2.2% primary; 1.6% metastatic).CN amplifications were associated with decreased overall survival in NSCLC (HR: 1.45, 95%CI: 1.06-1.99, p = .02), BC (HR: 3.04, 95%CI: 1.89-4.89, p = 4e-6), and PC (HR: 1.94, 95%CI: 1.03-3.68, p = .04). Amplifications were associated with wide-spread metastases in NSCLC, BC, and PC.CONCLUSIONSFOXA1 demonstrates distinct alteration profiles across cancer sites. Our findings suggest an association between FOXA1 amplification and both enhanced metastatic potential and decreased survival, highlighting prognostic and therapeutic potential in breast cancer, prostate cancer, and NSCLC.
{"title":"Pan-cancer genomic analysis reveals FOXA1 amplification is associated with adverse outcomes in non-small cell lung, prostate, and breast cancers.","authors":"Alexander G Goglia,Mohammed Alshalalfa,Anwar Khan,Danielle R Isakov,Helen Y Hougen,Nishwant Swami,Jasmine Kannikal,Sean M Mcbride,Daniel R Gomez,Sanoj Punnen,Paul L Nguyen,Puneeth Iyengar,Emmanuel S Antonarakis,Brandon A Mahal,Edward Christopher Dee","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae224","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONAlterations in forkhead box A1 (FOXA1), a pioneer transcription factor, are associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer (BC) and prostate cancer (PC). We characterized FOXA1 genomic alterations and their clinical impacts in a large pan-cancer cohort from the AACR GENIE database.METHODSFOXA1 alterations were characterized across >87,000 samples from >30 cancer types for primary and metastatic tumors alongside patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. FOXA1 alterations were queried in the MSK-MET cohort (a GENIE subset), allowing definition of hazard ratios (HRs) and survival estimates based on Cox proportional hazard models.RESULTSFOXA1 was altered in 1,869 samples (2.1%), with distinct patterns across different cancers: PC enriched with indel-inframe alterations, BC with missense mutations, and lung cancers with copy number (CN) amplifications.Of 74,715 samples with FOXA1 CN profiles, amplification was detected in 834 (1.1%). Amplification was most common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 3% in primary; 6% in metastatic) and small cell lung cancer (4.1% primary; 3.5% metastatic), followed by BC (2% primary; 1.6% metastatic) and PC (2.2% primary; 1.6% metastatic).CN amplifications were associated with decreased overall survival in NSCLC (HR: 1.45, 95%CI: 1.06-1.99, p = .02), BC (HR: 3.04, 95%CI: 1.89-4.89, p = 4e-6), and PC (HR: 1.94, 95%CI: 1.03-3.68, p = .04). Amplifications were associated with wide-spread metastases in NSCLC, BC, and PC.CONCLUSIONSFOXA1 demonstrates distinct alteration profiles across cancer sites. Our findings suggest an association between FOXA1 amplification and both enhanced metastatic potential and decreased survival, highlighting prognostic and therapeutic potential in breast cancer, prostate cancer, and NSCLC.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142165871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michael E Roth,Douglas S Hawkins,Janette K Merrill,Tara O Henderson
Adolescents and young adults with cancer (AYAs, aged 15 to 39 years) experience unique challenges due to their developmental life stage, and many have limited access to support and resources. CC-Connect, the patient assistance component of the White House Cancer Moonshot CC-DIRECT initiative that aims to help childhood cancer families find the best care for their child, undertook a multipronged effort to identify key strategies for addressing the unique needs of AYAs with cancer. This paper describes the four strategies that emerged to form a comprehensive framework for addressing the unmet needs of AYAs with cancer, which can improve outcomes and enhance the cancer care experience for this vulnerable population.
{"title":"CC-Connect: Identifying solutions to elevating the cancer experience for adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer.","authors":"Michael E Roth,Douglas S Hawkins,Janette K Merrill,Tara O Henderson","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae212","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae212","url":null,"abstract":"Adolescents and young adults with cancer (AYAs, aged 15 to 39 years) experience unique challenges due to their developmental life stage, and many have limited access to support and resources. CC-Connect, the patient assistance component of the White House Cancer Moonshot CC-DIRECT initiative that aims to help childhood cancer families find the best care for their child, undertook a multipronged effort to identify key strategies for addressing the unique needs of AYAs with cancer. This paper describes the four strategies that emerged to form a comprehensive framework for addressing the unmet needs of AYAs with cancer, which can improve outcomes and enhance the cancer care experience for this vulnerable population.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142165872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michelle C Janelsins, Kathleen Van Dyk, Sheri J Hartman, Thuy T Koll, Christina K Cramer, Glenn J Lesser, Debra L Barton, Karen M Mustian, Lynne I Wagner, Patricia A Ganz, Peter D Cole, Alexis Bakos, James C Root, Kristina Hardy, Allison Magnuson, Robert J Ferguson, Brenna C McDonald, Andrew J Saykin, Brian D Gonzalez, Jeffrey S Wefel, David A Morilak, Saurabh Dahiya, Cobi J Heijnen, Yvette P Conley, Alicia K Morgans, Donald Mabbott, Michelle Monje, Stephen R Rapp, Vinai Gondi, Catherine Bender, Leanne Embry, Worta McCaskill Stevens, Judith O Hopkins, Diane St Germain, Susan G Dorsey
Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a broad term encompassing subtle cognitive problems to more severe impairment. CRCI severity is influenced by host, disease, and treatment factors and affects patients prior to, during, and following cancer treatment. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Symptom Management and Health-Related Quality of Life Steering Committee (SxQoL SC) convened a Clinical Trial Planning Meeting (CTPM) to review the state of the science on CRCI and to develop both Phase II/III intervention trials aimed at improving cognitive function in cancer survivors with non-central nervous system (CNS) disease and longitudinal studies to understand the trajectory of cognitive impairment and contributing factors. Participants included experts in the field of CRCI, members of the SxQOL SC, patient advocates, representatives from all seven NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Research Bases, and the NCI. Presentations focused on the following topics: measurement, lessons learned from pediatric and geriatric oncology, biomarker and mechanism endpoints, longitudinal study designs, and pharmacologic and behavioral intervention trials. Panel discussions provided guidance on priority cognitive assessments, considerations for remote assessments, inclusion of relevant biomarkers, and strategies for ensuring broad inclusion criteria. Three CTPM working groups (longitudinal studies and pharmacologic and behavioral intervention trials) convened for one year to discuss and report on top priorities and to design studies. The CTPM experts concluded sufficient data exist to advance Phase II/Phase III trials utilizing selected pharmacologic and behavioral interventions for the treatment of CRCI in the non-CNS setting with recommendations included herein.
{"title":"The National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting to Address Gaps in Observational and Intervention Trials for Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment","authors":"Michelle C Janelsins, Kathleen Van Dyk, Sheri J Hartman, Thuy T Koll, Christina K Cramer, Glenn J Lesser, Debra L Barton, Karen M Mustian, Lynne I Wagner, Patricia A Ganz, Peter D Cole, Alexis Bakos, James C Root, Kristina Hardy, Allison Magnuson, Robert J Ferguson, Brenna C McDonald, Andrew J Saykin, Brian D Gonzalez, Jeffrey S Wefel, David A Morilak, Saurabh Dahiya, Cobi J Heijnen, Yvette P Conley, Alicia K Morgans, Donald Mabbott, Michelle Monje, Stephen R Rapp, Vinai Gondi, Catherine Bender, Leanne Embry, Worta McCaskill Stevens, Judith O Hopkins, Diane St Germain, Susan G Dorsey","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae209","url":null,"abstract":"Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a broad term encompassing subtle cognitive problems to more severe impairment. CRCI severity is influenced by host, disease, and treatment factors and affects patients prior to, during, and following cancer treatment. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Symptom Management and Health-Related Quality of Life Steering Committee (SxQoL SC) convened a Clinical Trial Planning Meeting (CTPM) to review the state of the science on CRCI and to develop both Phase II/III intervention trials aimed at improving cognitive function in cancer survivors with non-central nervous system (CNS) disease and longitudinal studies to understand the trajectory of cognitive impairment and contributing factors. Participants included experts in the field of CRCI, members of the SxQOL SC, patient advocates, representatives from all seven NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Research Bases, and the NCI. Presentations focused on the following topics: measurement, lessons learned from pediatric and geriatric oncology, biomarker and mechanism endpoints, longitudinal study designs, and pharmacologic and behavioral intervention trials. Panel discussions provided guidance on priority cognitive assessments, considerations for remote assessments, inclusion of relevant biomarkers, and strategies for ensuring broad inclusion criteria. Three CTPM working groups (longitudinal studies and pharmacologic and behavioral intervention trials) convened for one year to discuss and report on top priorities and to design studies. The CTPM experts concluded sufficient data exist to advance Phase II/Phase III trials utilizing selected pharmacologic and behavioral interventions for the treatment of CRCI in the non-CNS setting with recommendations included herein.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142160517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Danielle R Trakimas, Wojciech K Mydlarz, Leila J Mady, Christine G Gourin, Wayne Koch, Nyall R London, Harry Quon, Ana P Kiess, Tanguy Y Seiwert, Carole Fakhry
Background The rate of primary surgery for human papillomavirus-related oropharynx cancer (HPVOPC) has recently declined, while utilization of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has lagged at community cancer centers (CCs). We hypothesize that differences in overall survival (OS) exist between patients undergoing surgery for HPVOPC at CCs and low (<15 TORS/year; LVACs) and high (≥15 TORS/year; HVACS) TORS volume academic centers. Methods Cases from the US National Cancer Database with a diagnosis of HPVOPC from 2010-2019 that underwent primary surgical treatment were included. Trends in TORS utilization, rates of positive surgical margins (PMs), quality of adjuvant treatment and 5-year OS were compared between CCs, LVACs and HVACs. Results 5,406 cases met study criteria. A significantly lower proportion of cases at CCs utilized TORS than at LVACs or HVACs (26.2% vs 44.0% vs 73.9%, respectively, p < .001). The rate of PMs was significantly higher at CCs than at LVACs or HVACs (25.7% vs 15.3% vs 9.2%, p < .001). A greater proportion of cases undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) received prolonged courses (23.6% vs 13.1% vs 8.8%, p < .001) or excessive doses (16.5% vs 11.5% vs 8.7%, p < .001) of RT at CCs than at LVACs or HVACs, respectively. 5-year OS was lowest at CCs (85.2%, 95%CI: 81.7-88.2%), intermediate at LVACs (88.9%, 95%CI: 87.2-90.4%), and highest at HVACs (91.4%, 95%CI: 89.5-92.9%; pLR<0.01). Conclusions Significant differences in the type and quality of surgical and adjuvant treatment for HPVOPC exist between facility types based on TORS volume. Overall survival was lowest at CCs, intermediate at LVACs and highest at HVACs.
背景 最近，人乳头瘤病毒相关口咽癌（HPVOPC）的初级手术率有所下降，而社区癌症中心（CCs）对经口机器人手术（TORS）的使用却滞后。我们假设，在社区癌症中心和低TORS使用率（<15 TORS/年；LVACs）和高TORS使用率（≥15 TORS/年；HVACS）学术中心接受HPVOPC手术的患者之间存在总生存率（OS）差异。方法 纳入美国国家癌症数据库中 2010-2019 年期间诊断为 HPVOPC 并接受初级手术治疗的病例。比较了CC、LVAC和HVAC之间的TORS使用趋势、手术切缘阳性率（PMs）、辅助治疗质量和5年OS。结果 5406 个病例符合研究标准。CC使用TORS的病例比例明显低于LVAC或HVAC（分别为26.2% vs 44.0% vs 73.9%，p&p;lt; .001）。CC的PM率明显高于LVAC或HVAC（分别为25.7% vs 15.3% vs 9.2%，p< .001）。与LVACs或HVACs相比，在CC接受辅助放疗（RT）的病例中，接受延长疗程（23.6% vs 13.1% vs 8.8%，p p &;lt;.001）或超剂量（16.5% vs 11.5% vs 8.7%，p p &;lt;.001）放疗的比例更高。CC的5年OS最低（85.2%，95%CI：81.7-88.2%），LVAC居中（88.9%，95%CI：87.2-90.4%），HVAC最高（91.4%，95%CI：89.5-92.9%；pLR<0.01）。结论 根据TORS的数量，不同类型的医疗机构在HPVOPC手术和辅助治疗的类型和质量方面存在显著差异。CC的总生存率最低，LVAC居中，HVAC最高。
{"title":"Lower survival for surgical treatment of HPV-related oropharynx cancer at community cancer centers","authors":"Danielle R Trakimas, Wojciech K Mydlarz, Leila J Mady, Christine G Gourin, Wayne Koch, Nyall R London, Harry Quon, Ana P Kiess, Tanguy Y Seiwert, Carole Fakhry","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae220","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae220","url":null,"abstract":"Background The rate of primary surgery for human papillomavirus-related oropharynx cancer (HPVOPC) has recently declined, while utilization of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has lagged at community cancer centers (CCs). We hypothesize that differences in overall survival (OS) exist between patients undergoing surgery for HPVOPC at CCs and low (&lt;15 TORS/year; LVACs) and high (≥15 TORS/year; HVACS) TORS volume academic centers. Methods Cases from the US National Cancer Database with a diagnosis of HPVOPC from 2010-2019 that underwent primary surgical treatment were included. Trends in TORS utilization, rates of positive surgical margins (PMs), quality of adjuvant treatment and 5-year OS were compared between CCs, LVACs and HVACs. Results 5,406 cases met study criteria. A significantly lower proportion of cases at CCs utilized TORS than at LVACs or HVACs (26.2% vs 44.0% vs 73.9%, respectively, p &lt; .001). The rate of PMs was significantly higher at CCs than at LVACs or HVACs (25.7% vs 15.3% vs 9.2%, p &lt; .001). A greater proportion of cases undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) received prolonged courses (23.6% vs 13.1% vs 8.8%, p &lt; .001) or excessive doses (16.5% vs 11.5% vs 8.7%, p &lt; .001) of RT at CCs than at LVACs or HVACs, respectively. 5-year OS was lowest at CCs (85.2%, 95%CI: 81.7-88.2%), intermediate at LVACs (88.9%, 95%CI: 87.2-90.4%), and highest at HVACs (91.4%, 95%CI: 89.5-92.9%; pLR&lt;0.01). Conclusions Significant differences in the type and quality of surgical and adjuvant treatment for HPVOPC exist between facility types based on TORS volume. Overall survival was lowest at CCs, intermediate at LVACs and highest at HVACs.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142160518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Martina Pagliuca, Julie Havas, Emilie Thomas, Youenn Drouet, Davide Soldato, Maria Alice Franzoi, Joana Ribeiro, Camila K Chiodi, Emma Gillanders, Barbara Pistilli, Gwenn Menvielle, Florence Joly, Florence Lerebours, Olivier Rigal, Thierry Petit, Sylvie Giacchetti, Florence Dalenc, Johanna Wassermann, Olivier Arsene, Anne Laure Martin, Sibille Everhard, Olivier Tredan, Sandrine Boyault, Michelino De Laurentiis, Alain Viari, Jean Francois Deleuze, Aurelie Bertaut, Fabrice André, Ines Vaz-Luis, Antonio Di Meglio
Background Fatigue, cognitive impairment, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance are cancer-related behavioral symptoms (CRBS) that may persist years after early-stage breast cancer (BC), affecting quality of life. We aimed at generating a predictive model of long-term CRBS clusters among BC survivors four years post-diagnosis. Methods Patients with early-stage BC were included from the CANcer TOxicity (NCT01993498). Our outcome was the proportion of patients reporting CRBS clusters four years post-diagnosis (≥3 severe CRBS). Predictors, including clinical, behavioral, and treatment-related characteristics, Behavioral Symptoms Score (BSS; 1 point per severe CRBS at diagnosis) and a pro-inflammatory cytokine (IL-1b, IL-6, TNFα)-genetic risk score, were tested using multivariable logistic regression, implementing bootstrapped Augmented Backwards Elimination. A two-sided p-value < 0.05 defined statistical significance. Results In the development cohort (N = 3555), 642 patients (19.0%) reported a cluster of CRBS at diagnosis and 755 (21.2%) did so four years post-diagnosis. Younger age (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] for 1-year decrement: 1.012; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.003-1.020); previous psychiatric disorders (aOR vs no: 1.27; 95% CI 1.01-1.60); and BSS (aOR ranged from 2.17 [1.66-2.85] for BSS = 1 vs 0 to 12.3 [7.33-20.87] for BSS = 5 vs 0) were predictors of reporting a cluster of CRBS (AUC 0.73 [95%CI 0.71-0.75]). Genetic risk score was not predictive of CRBS. Results were confirmed in the validation cohort (N = 1533). Conclusion Younger patients with previous psychiatric disorders and higher baseline symptom burden have greater risk of long-term clusters of CRBS. Our model might be implemented in clinical pathways to improve management and test the effectiveness of risk mitigation interventions among breast cancer survivors.
{"title":"Long-term behavioral symptom clusters among survivors of early-stage breast cancer. development and validation of a predictive model","authors":"Martina Pagliuca, Julie Havas, Emilie Thomas, Youenn Drouet, Davide Soldato, Maria Alice Franzoi, Joana Ribeiro, Camila K Chiodi, Emma Gillanders, Barbara Pistilli, Gwenn Menvielle, Florence Joly, Florence Lerebours, Olivier Rigal, Thierry Petit, Sylvie Giacchetti, Florence Dalenc, Johanna Wassermann, Olivier Arsene, Anne Laure Martin, Sibille Everhard, Olivier Tredan, Sandrine Boyault, Michelino De Laurentiis, Alain Viari, Jean Francois Deleuze, Aurelie Bertaut, Fabrice André, Ines Vaz-Luis, Antonio Di Meglio","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae222","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae222","url":null,"abstract":"Background Fatigue, cognitive impairment, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance are cancer-related behavioral symptoms (CRBS) that may persist years after early-stage breast cancer (BC), affecting quality of life. We aimed at generating a predictive model of long-term CRBS clusters among BC survivors four years post-diagnosis. Methods Patients with early-stage BC were included from the CANcer TOxicity (NCT01993498). Our outcome was the proportion of patients reporting CRBS clusters four years post-diagnosis (≥3 severe CRBS). Predictors, including clinical, behavioral, and treatment-related characteristics, Behavioral Symptoms Score (BSS; 1 point per severe CRBS at diagnosis) and a pro-inflammatory cytokine (IL-1b, IL-6, TNFα)-genetic risk score, were tested using multivariable logistic regression, implementing bootstrapped Augmented Backwards Elimination. A two-sided p-value &lt; 0.05 defined statistical significance. Results In the development cohort (N = 3555), 642 patients (19.0%) reported a cluster of CRBS at diagnosis and 755 (21.2%) did so four years post-diagnosis. Younger age (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] for 1-year decrement: 1.012; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.003-1.020); previous psychiatric disorders (aOR vs no: 1.27; 95% CI 1.01-1.60); and BSS (aOR ranged from 2.17 [1.66-2.85] for BSS = 1 vs 0 to 12.3 [7.33-20.87] for BSS = 5 vs 0) were predictors of reporting a cluster of CRBS (AUC 0.73 [95%CI 0.71-0.75]). Genetic risk score was not predictive of CRBS. Results were confirmed in the validation cohort (N = 1533). Conclusion Younger patients with previous psychiatric disorders and higher baseline symptom burden have greater risk of long-term clusters of CRBS. Our model might be implemented in clinical pathways to improve management and test the effectiveness of risk mitigation interventions among breast cancer survivors.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142160519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lauren M Janczewski, Michael R Visenio, Rachel Hae-Soo Joung, Anthony D Yang, David D O’Dell, Elizabeth C Danielson, Mitchell C Posner, Ted A Skolarus, David J Bentrem, Karl Y Bilimoria, Ryan P Merkow
Background Pancreatic cancer remains highly lethal and resection represents the only chance for cure. Although patients are counseled regarding short-term (0-3 months) mortality, little is known about mortality 3-6 months (intermediate-term) following surgery. We assessed predictors of intermediate-term mortality, evaluated hospital-level variation, and developed a nomogram to predict intermediate-term mortality risk. Methods Patients undergoing pancreatic cancer resection were identified from the National Cancer Database (2010-2020). Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of intermediate-term mortality and assessed differences between short-term and intermediate-term mortality. Multinomial regression grouped by intermediate-term mortality quartiles evaluated hospital-level variation. A neural network model was constructed to predict intermediate-term mortality risk. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Of 45,297 patients, 3,974 (8.9%) died within 6-months of surgery of which 2,216 (5.1%) were intermediate-term. Intermediate-term mortality was associated with increasing T-category, positive nodes, lack of systemic therapy, and positive margins (all p < .05) compared with survival beyond 6-months. Compared with short-term, intermediate-term mortality was associated with treatment at high-volume hospitals, positive nodes, neoadjuvant systemic therapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, and positive margins (all p < .05). Median intermediate-term mortality rate per hospital was 4.5% (IQR 2.6-6.5). Highest quartile hospitals had decreased odds of treatment with neoadjuvant systemic therapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and adjuvant radiotherapy (all p < .05). The neural network nomogram was highly accurate (Accuracy: 0.9499; AUC-ROC of 0.7531) in predicting individualized intermediate-term mortality risk. Conclusion Nearly 10% of patients undergoing pancreatectomy for cancer died within 6-months of which half occurred in the intermediate-term. These data have real-world implications to improve shared decision-making when discussing curative-intent pancreatectomy.
背景 胰腺癌的致死率仍然很高，切除是治愈的唯一机会。虽然患者会被告知短期（0-3 个月）死亡率，但对术后 3-6 个月（中期）的死亡率却知之甚少。我们评估了中期死亡率的预测因素，评估了医院层面的差异，并开发了一个预测中期死亡风险的提名图。方法 从国家癌症数据库（2010-2020 年）中识别出接受胰腺癌切除术的患者。多变量逻辑回归确定了中期死亡率的预测因素，并评估了短期死亡率和中期死亡率之间的差异。按中期死亡率四分位数分组的多项式回归评估了医院层面的差异。建立了一个神经网络模型来预测中期死亡风险。所有统计检验均为双侧检验。结果 在45297名患者中，有3974人（8.9%）在术后6个月内死亡，其中2216人（5.1%）为中期死亡。与 6 个月后的存活率相比，中期死亡率与 T 类增加、结节阳性、缺乏系统治疗和边缘阳性有关（所有 p &p;lt;0.05）。与短期死亡率相比，中期死亡率与在大医院治疗、结节阳性、新辅助系统治疗、辅助放疗和边缘阳性有关（均为 p &;lt;.05）。每家医院的中期死亡率中位数为 4.5%（IQR 2.6-6.5）。四分位数最高的医院采用新辅助系统疗法、新辅助放疗和辅助放疗的几率较低（均为 p &;lt;.05）。神经网络提名图在预测个体化中期死亡风险方面具有很高的准确性（准确率：0.9499；AUC-ROC：0.7531）。结论 近 10%的癌症胰腺切除术患者在 6 个月内死亡，其中一半发生在中期。这些数据对改善讨论根治性胰腺切除术时的共同决策具有现实意义。
{"title":"Assessment of Intermediate-Term Mortality Following Pancreatectomy for Cancer","authors":"Lauren M Janczewski, Michael R Visenio, Rachel Hae-Soo Joung, Anthony D Yang, David D O’Dell, Elizabeth C Danielson, Mitchell C Posner, Ted A Skolarus, David J Bentrem, Karl Y Bilimoria, Ryan P Merkow","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae215","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae215","url":null,"abstract":"Background Pancreatic cancer remains highly lethal and resection represents the only chance for cure. Although patients are counseled regarding short-term (0-3 months) mortality, little is known about mortality 3-6 months (intermediate-term) following surgery. We assessed predictors of intermediate-term mortality, evaluated hospital-level variation, and developed a nomogram to predict intermediate-term mortality risk. Methods Patients undergoing pancreatic cancer resection were identified from the National Cancer Database (2010-2020). Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of intermediate-term mortality and assessed differences between short-term and intermediate-term mortality. Multinomial regression grouped by intermediate-term mortality quartiles evaluated hospital-level variation. A neural network model was constructed to predict intermediate-term mortality risk. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Of 45,297 patients, 3,974 (8.9%) died within 6-months of surgery of which 2,216 (5.1%) were intermediate-term. Intermediate-term mortality was associated with increasing T-category, positive nodes, lack of systemic therapy, and positive margins (all p &lt; .05) compared with survival beyond 6-months. Compared with short-term, intermediate-term mortality was associated with treatment at high-volume hospitals, positive nodes, neoadjuvant systemic therapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, and positive margins (all p &lt; .05). Median intermediate-term mortality rate per hospital was 4.5% (IQR 2.6-6.5). Highest quartile hospitals had decreased odds of treatment with neoadjuvant systemic therapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and adjuvant radiotherapy (all p &lt; .05). The neural network nomogram was highly accurate (Accuracy: 0.9499; AUC-ROC of 0.7531) in predicting individualized intermediate-term mortality risk. Conclusion Nearly 10% of patients undergoing pancreatectomy for cancer died within 6-months of which half occurred in the intermediate-term. These data have real-world implications to improve shared decision-making when discussing curative-intent pancreatectomy.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142100741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
En Cheng, Fang-Shu Ou, Clare Gatten, Chao Ma, Alan P Venook, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Eileen M O’Reilly, Peter T Campbell, Chaoyuan Kuang, Bette J Caan, Charles D Blanke, Kimmie Ng, Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
Background Plant-based diet is associated with better survival among patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), but its association in metastatic CRC is unknown. Methods Using an NCI-sponsored trial (CALGB/SWOG 80405), we included 1,284 patients who completed validated food frequency questionnaires at the initiation of metastatic CRC treatment. We calculated three indices: overall plant-based diet index (PDI), which emphasized consumption of all plant foods while reducing animal food intake; healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI), which emphasized consumption of healthful plant foods such as whole grains, fruits, and vegetables; and unhealthful plant-based diet index (uPDI), which emphasized consumption of less healthful plant foods such as fruit juices, refined grains, and sugar-sweetened beverages. We estimated the associations of three indices (quintiles) with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results We observed 1,100 deaths and 1,204 progression events (median follow-up: 6.1 years). Compared to the lowest quintile, patients in the highest quintile of PDI had significantly better survival (HR for OS: 0.76 [0.62-0.94], P trend=0.004; PFS: 0.81 [0.66-0.99], P trend=0.09). Similar findings were observed for hPDI (HR for OS: 0.81 [0.65-1.01], P trend=0.053; PFS: 0.80 [0.65-0.98], P trend=0.04), whereas uPDI was not associated with worse survival (HR for OS: 1.16 [0.94-1.43], P trend=0.21; PFS: 1.12 [0.92-1.36], P trend=0.42). Conclusions Our study suggests that plant-based diet, especially when rich in healthful plant foods, is associated with better survival among patients with metastatic CRC. The cause of survival benefits warrants further investigation.
{"title":"Plant-Based Diet and Survival Among Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer","authors":"En Cheng, Fang-Shu Ou, Clare Gatten, Chao Ma, Alan P Venook, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Eileen M O’Reilly, Peter T Campbell, Chaoyuan Kuang, Bette J Caan, Charles D Blanke, Kimmie Ng, Jeffrey A Meyerhardt","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae213","url":null,"abstract":"Background Plant-based diet is associated with better survival among patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), but its association in metastatic CRC is unknown. Methods Using an NCI-sponsored trial (CALGB/SWOG 80405), we included 1,284 patients who completed validated food frequency questionnaires at the initiation of metastatic CRC treatment. We calculated three indices: overall plant-based diet index (PDI), which emphasized consumption of all plant foods while reducing animal food intake; healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI), which emphasized consumption of healthful plant foods such as whole grains, fruits, and vegetables; and unhealthful plant-based diet index (uPDI), which emphasized consumption of less healthful plant foods such as fruit juices, refined grains, and sugar-sweetened beverages. We estimated the associations of three indices (quintiles) with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results We observed 1,100 deaths and 1,204 progression events (median follow-up: 6.1 years). Compared to the lowest quintile, patients in the highest quintile of PDI had significantly better survival (HR for OS: 0.76 [0.62-0.94], P trend=0.004; PFS: 0.81 [0.66-0.99], P trend=0.09). Similar findings were observed for hPDI (HR for OS: 0.81 [0.65-1.01], P trend=0.053; PFS: 0.80 [0.65-0.98], P trend=0.04), whereas uPDI was not associated with worse survival (HR for OS: 1.16 [0.94-1.43], P trend=0.21; PFS: 1.12 [0.92-1.36], P trend=0.42). Conclusions Our study suggests that plant-based diet, especially when rich in healthful plant foods, is associated with better survival among patients with metastatic CRC. The cause of survival benefits warrants further investigation.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142100704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Steven A Narod, Jacek Gronwald, Beth Karlan, Pal Moller, Tomasz Huzarski, Nadine Tung, Amber Aeilts, Andrea Eisen, Susan Randall Armel, Christian F Singer, William D Foulkes, Susan L Neuhausen, Olufunmilayo Olopade, Tuya Pal, Robert Fruscio, Kelly Metcalfe, Rebecca Raj, Michelle Jacobson, Ping Sun, Jan Lubinski, Joanne Kotsopoulos
Background To estimate the incidence of primary peritoneal cancer following preventive bilateral oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Methods A total of 6,310 women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who underwent a preventive bilateral oophorectomy were followed for a mean of 7.8 years from oophorectomy. The 20-year cumulative incidence of peritoneal cancer post-oophorectomy was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A left-truncated Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) associated with the age at oophorectomy, year of oophorectomy, and family history of ovarian cancer as well as hormonal and reproductive risk factors. Results Fifty-five women developed primary peritoneal cancer (n = 45 in BRCA1, 8 in BRCA2, and 2 in women with a mutation in both genes). Their mean age at oophorectomy was 48.9 years. The annual risk of peritoneal cancer was 0.14% for women with a BRCA1 mutation and was 0.06% for women with a BRCA2 mutation. The 20-year cumulative risk of peritoneal cancer from the date of oophorectomy was 2.7% for BRCA1 carriers and was 0.9% for BRCA2 mutation carriers. There were no peritoneal cancers in BRCA1 carriers who had the operation before age 35 or in BRCA2 carriers who had the operation before age 45. Conclusions For BRCA1 mutation carriers, the annual risk of peritoneal cancer for 20 years post-oophorectomy is 0.14% per year. The risk is lower for BRCA2 carriers (0.06% per year).
{"title":"Incidence of Peritoneal Cancer Following Oophorectomy among BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers","authors":"Steven A Narod, Jacek Gronwald, Beth Karlan, Pal Moller, Tomasz Huzarski, Nadine Tung, Amber Aeilts, Andrea Eisen, Susan Randall Armel, Christian F Singer, William D Foulkes, Susan L Neuhausen, Olufunmilayo Olopade, Tuya Pal, Robert Fruscio, Kelly Metcalfe, Rebecca Raj, Michelle Jacobson, Ping Sun, Jan Lubinski, Joanne Kotsopoulos","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae151","url":null,"abstract":"Background To estimate the incidence of primary peritoneal cancer following preventive bilateral oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Methods A total of 6,310 women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who underwent a preventive bilateral oophorectomy were followed for a mean of 7.8 years from oophorectomy. The 20-year cumulative incidence of peritoneal cancer post-oophorectomy was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A left-truncated Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) associated with the age at oophorectomy, year of oophorectomy, and family history of ovarian cancer as well as hormonal and reproductive risk factors. Results Fifty-five women developed primary peritoneal cancer (n = 45 in BRCA1, 8 in BRCA2, and 2 in women with a mutation in both genes). Their mean age at oophorectomy was 48.9 years. The annual risk of peritoneal cancer was 0.14% for women with a BRCA1 mutation and was 0.06% for women with a BRCA2 mutation. The 20-year cumulative risk of peritoneal cancer from the date of oophorectomy was 2.7% for BRCA1 carriers and was 0.9% for BRCA2 mutation carriers. There were no peritoneal cancers in BRCA1 carriers who had the operation before age 35 or in BRCA2 carriers who had the operation before age 45. Conclusions For BRCA1 mutation carriers, the annual risk of peritoneal cancer for 20 years post-oophorectomy is 0.14% per year. The risk is lower for BRCA2 carriers (0.06% per year).","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141462710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pia Banerjee, Nicholas S Phillips, Wei Liu, Matthew J Ehrhardt, Nickhill Bhakta, Tara M Brinkman, Annalynn M Williams, Yutaka Yasui, Raja B Khan, Deokumar Srivastava, Kirsten K Ness, Leslie L Robison, Melissa M Hudson, Kevin R Krull
Background Neurocognitive impairments are sequelae of childhood cancer treatment, however little guidance is given to clinicians on common phenotypes of impairment, or modifiable risk factors that could lead to personalized interventions in survivorship. Methods Standardized clinical testing of neurocognitive function was conducted in 2,958 (74.1%) eligible survivors, who were ≥5 years post-diagnosis and >18 years old, and 477 community controls. Impairment was examined across 20 measures and phenotypes were determined by latent class analysis. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate risk for phenotype, predicted by cancer diagnosis and treatment exposures, chronic health conditions, and lifestyle, adjusted for sex and age. Associations between phenotypes and social attainment were examined. Results Five neurocognitive phenotypes were identified in survivors (global impairment 3.7%, impaired attention 5.0%, memory impairment 7.2%, processing speed/executive function impairment 9.3%, no impairment 74.8%). Risk of global impairment was associated with severe chronic health condition burden (odds ratio [OR]=20.17, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 11.41-35.63) including cerebrovascular disease (OR = 14.5, 95%CI = 5.47-38.44) and cerebrovascular accident (OR = 14.7, 95%CI = 7.50-26.40). Modifiable risk factors, like quitting smoking reduced risk for global impairment (OR = 0.21, 95%CI 0.06-0.66). Low physical activity increased risk for global impairment (OR = 4.54, 95%CI 2.86-7.21), attention impairment (OR 2.01, 95%CI 1.41-2.87), processing speed/executive function impairment (OR 1.90, 95%CI 1.46-2.48), and memory impairment (OR 2.09, 95%CI 1.54-2.82). Conclusions Results support the clinical utility of neurocognitive phenotyping to develop risk profiles and personalized clinical interventions, such as preventing cerebrovascular disease in anthracycline treated survivors by preventing hypercholesterolemia, smoking, and sedentary lifestyle, to reduce the risk for global impairment.
{"title":"Using Neurocognitive Phenotypes to Inform Interventions for Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer","authors":"Pia Banerjee, Nicholas S Phillips, Wei Liu, Matthew J Ehrhardt, Nickhill Bhakta, Tara M Brinkman, Annalynn M Williams, Yutaka Yasui, Raja B Khan, Deokumar Srivastava, Kirsten K Ness, Leslie L Robison, Melissa M Hudson, Kevin R Krull","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae149","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae149","url":null,"abstract":"Background Neurocognitive impairments are sequelae of childhood cancer treatment, however little guidance is given to clinicians on common phenotypes of impairment, or modifiable risk factors that could lead to personalized interventions in survivorship. Methods Standardized clinical testing of neurocognitive function was conducted in 2,958 (74.1%) eligible survivors, who were ≥5 years post-diagnosis and &gt;18 years old, and 477 community controls. Impairment was examined across 20 measures and phenotypes were determined by latent class analysis. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate risk for phenotype, predicted by cancer diagnosis and treatment exposures, chronic health conditions, and lifestyle, adjusted for sex and age. Associations between phenotypes and social attainment were examined. Results Five neurocognitive phenotypes were identified in survivors (global impairment 3.7%, impaired attention 5.0%, memory impairment 7.2%, processing speed/executive function impairment 9.3%, no impairment 74.8%). Risk of global impairment was associated with severe chronic health condition burden (odds ratio [OR]=20.17, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 11.41-35.63) including cerebrovascular disease (OR = 14.5, 95%CI = 5.47-38.44) and cerebrovascular accident (OR = 14.7, 95%CI = 7.50-26.40). Modifiable risk factors, like quitting smoking reduced risk for global impairment (OR = 0.21, 95%CI 0.06-0.66). Low physical activity increased risk for global impairment (OR = 4.54, 95%CI 2.86-7.21), attention impairment (OR 2.01, 95%CI 1.41-2.87), processing speed/executive function impairment (OR 1.90, 95%CI 1.46-2.48), and memory impairment (OR 2.09, 95%CI 1.54-2.82). Conclusions Results support the clinical utility of neurocognitive phenotyping to develop risk profiles and personalized clinical interventions, such as preventing cerebrovascular disease in anthracycline treated survivors by preventing hypercholesterolemia, smoking, and sedentary lifestyle, to reduce the risk for global impairment.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141462682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：