Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics最新文献

Objective: To describe changes in household food security status among families with young children before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, when many families experienced changes in food security status because of pandemic disruptions and relief programs, and to investigate the association between household food insecurity (FI) before and/or during the pandemic and developmental milestone attainment.

Method: We used an interrupted time series design to evaluate the association between household FI and developmental milestone attainment before and during the pandemic. Our sample included US children 0 to 5 years with FI and developmental screenings prepandemic (June 2017 to February 2020) and intrapandemic (May 2020 to May 2022) in the Comprehensive Health and Decision Information System. Children with no food insecurity were compared to children with only intrapandemic (new), only prepandemic (resolved), or both intrapandemic and prepandemic (persistent) FI.

Results: We found lower developmental milestone attainment only in the persistent FI group, with significantly lower communication (adjusted difference = -0.17; 95% CI, -0.33 to -0.01) and personal-social (adjusted difference = -0.15; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.01) scores, versus children with no FI. There were no differences in developmental milestone attainment in any domains for children with new or resolved FI compared to children with no FI.

Conclusion: Using the pandemic as a natural experiment to study how changes in household food security status are associated with development, we found that persistent, but not transient, household FI is associated with suboptimal early childhood development. To promote healthy development, pediatricians should promptly intervene to address FI and advocate for governmental programs that promote food security.

Objective: Feeding problems in typically developing children (TDCs) are quite common in early childhood and are of great concern for parents, as they significantly impact nutritional intake and overall health. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of feeding difficulties in typically developing children from India aged 1 to 5 years using the Kannada version of the Behavioral Pediatrics Feeding Assessment Scale (BPFAS).

Method: Data were gathered from 253 parents of typically developing children via a purposive sampling method. The parents completed a self-reported demographic questionnaire and a Kannada version of the BPFAS.

Results: The survey analyzed the responses of 124 (49%) male and 129 (51%) female children. According to the BPFAS cutoff scores, the prevalence of feeding difficulties among TDCs in the study was 28.9% (n = 73) (TFS >84) and 18.2% (n = 46) (TPS >9). Even though a higher percentage of children exhibited negative feeding behaviors, very few parents considered these behaviors problematic for them. Furthermore, analysis revealed a weak negative correlation between BMI and TFS and TPS scores (Pearson r values of -0.027 [ p = 0.669] for the TFS score and -0.049 [ p = 0.436] for the TPS score).

Conclusion: The present study reveals a higher prevalence of parent-perceived feeding issues in young, typically developing children from India. This highlights the necessity of educating Indian parents about feeding issues in young children, their potential long-term consequences, and the need for early intervention.

Objective: Neural development differs between in-utero and ex-utero environments. Length of gestational age (GA) is associated with brain development and early life neurodevelopmental outcomes, affecting both preterm and term infants. This study aimed to examine a wide range of GA and provide a more comprehensive understanding of its effects on various developmental domains.

Method: Four hundred fifty-four infants who were born at 24 to 41 weeks of GA were included in this analysis. Cognitive, language, and motor development between 8 and 30 months of age were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III). Associations between GA and outcomes were analyzed using linear and logistic mixed-effects models.

Results: GA was positively associated with all examined developmental domains with a small-sized effect (Pearson's correlation coefficients: 0.08-0.15; p < 0.05). After adjusting for covariates, linear mixed-effect models estimated that each additional week of GA was associated with an increase in Bayley III composite scores: cognitive (0.6 points), language (0.6 points), and motor (0.62 points). Logistic mixed-effect models showed that after adjusting for the covariates, each additional week of GA reduced the adjusted odds ratio of delay in 1 of the language subdomains (i.e., receptive communication) by 13%.

Conclusion: We found a small impact of GA on cognitive, language, and motor development across a wide range of GA. Language and its subdomains seem particularly sensitive to the effects of prematurity. Thus, regular monitoring and parent-based early intervention, especially in the language domain, are warranted for early-term and preterm infants.

Purpose: To determine whether caregiver expectation and symptoms of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were significantly associated with self-management behavior in a sample of youth and young adults with spina bifida (SB), while accounting for several other condition-related and sociodemographic factors.

Methods: Participants were drawn from clinical cases seen through a multidisciplinary outpatient SB clinic at a children's hospital between 2022 and 2023. Participants included 52 youth and young adults younger than 21 years diagnosed with SB. Caregiver report of youth and young adult self-management behavior and caregiver expectation were obtained using the Kennedy Krieger Independence Scales-Spina Bifida Version (KKIS-SB). Caregiver report of youth and young adult ADHD symptoms were obtained using the National Institute for Children's Health Quality Vanderbilt Assessment Scale-Parent Version.

Results: Caregiver expectation and symptoms of ADHD were significantly associated with self-management behaviors in youth and young adults with SB, including the ability to initiate daily self-care and home living routines independently and the ability to use prospective memory to complete tasks that are needed for good health. More ADHD symptoms were associated with poorer ratings of self-management behavior and higher caregiver expectation was associated with better ratings of self-management behavior.

Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that caregiver expectations and co-occurring neurocognitive challenges may be influential when considering self-management behaviors in youth and young adults with SB. Family-based interventions that target caregiver perceptions and behaviors and provide psychoeducation about neurocognitive challenges as they relate to self-management behaviors may be an important target for future research.

Objectives: We sought to examine differences in caregiver-reported adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in adolescents with and without autism and explore associations between ACEs and behavioral and emotional problems in those with ACEs.

Methods: Children were classified as having autism, another developmental disability (DD), or population comparison (POP) after a comprehensive evaluation in the Study to Explore Early Development (SEED) between 2 to 5 years of age. Caregivers of these same children completed the SEED Teen survey and answered questions about ACEs and current behavioral and emotional problems at 12 to 16 years of age.

Results: Adolescents with autism (n = 198) and other DD (n = 330) were more likely than POP (n = 330) to experience income insufficiency (29.8%, 25.2%, and 12.2%, respectively) and parental divorce (29.3%, 25.7%, and 18.4%, respectively) (all p < 0.05). Living with someone with an alcohol or drug problem was associated with conduct problems only in adolescents with autism; living in a family that received financial assistance was associated with hyperactivity problems only in adolescents with other DD. Living with anyone experiencing mental illness, suicidality, or severe depression was associated with conduct and emotional problems in all 3 study groups.

Conclusion: Families of children with atypical development may need more financial and emotional/marital support than others. Moreover, adolescents with autism and other DD could benefit from behavioral supports in response to a few specific ACEs while addressing household mental health problems could have widespread benefits that improve pediatric health. These findings can be used to encourage evidence-based programs and practices to prevent ACEs and offer supports when needed.

Objective: Health professionals participating in learning health networks collect data for informing clinical decision-making, research, and quality improvement (QI). To optimize the collection and use of clinical and Parent Reported Outcome (PRO) data for these purposes, it is important to understand the priorities of patient registry "end users" (clinicians, researchers, and patients/families).

Methods: The analysis used a sequential mixed-methods approach with parent (n = 93) and clinician (n = 167) surveys followed by targeted interviews (parent n = 9, clinician/researcher n = 7) completed at Autism Care Network (ACNet) sites to better understand current use of registry data and parent/clinician priorities.

Results: Sixty percent of parents reported receiving behavioral data regarding their child from their health provider in the past, and 90% felt these data would help them understand their child's behavior. Among data access options parents preferred an online portal (72%) and/or the clinic's electronic medical record (59%). Parents indicated willingness to complete surveys longitudinally if the assessments correlated with their child's specific areas of difficulty. Priorities for clinicians included easy access to the data (84%), meaningful connection to clinical outcomes (81%), and measures that can demonstrate change in symptoms over time (76%) and that are easy for families to complete (80%). Both groups recommend assessing parenting stress and social determinants of health.

Conclusion: Consideration of end-user priorities can improve patient registry data collection, analysis, and utilization. Families may be more willing to participate if they can receive direct benefit by accessing their own data and clinicians use this data to optimize clinical care.

Objective: A systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted to evaluate the potential adverse impacts on neurodevelopment associated with prenatal opiate exposure.

Method: After applying exclusion criteria to the identified collection of studies, 86 studies were included in this review. Each article was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations system. Results were grouped into 6 neurobehavioral function domains (executive, language, general development, motor, neurosensory, and socioemotional) and 1 neuroimaging domain.

Result: Risk difference analyses showed the neurosensory domain in children prenatally exposed to opioid had highest risk of impairment (76.9%), whereas the executive domain had lowest risk (44.8%). The meta-analysis of pooled estimates after statistical adjustments associated with the Egger's test results showed effect size (Hedge's g) was largest in the socioemotional domain (-1.14; 95% CI, -1.61 to -0.66) and smallest in the general development domain (-0.44; 95% CI, -0.70 to -0.18). Neuroimaging studies on prenatal exposure to opioid were limited and varied in the techniques and topographical focus in their approaches, resulting in a heterogenous body of literature.

Conclusion: Maternal opioid use during pregnancy can serve as a risk indicator for an at-risk child and the potential need for monitoring the child's neurodevelopmental growth. The conclusions related to the direct teratogenic effects of maternal opioid use, however, are often limited by poor experimental and statistical controls used to address other substances and social adversity that co-occur with opioid use.

Objective: To determine the performance of autism screeners at 12 and 15 months of age.

Methods: Children were screened either at 12- (n = 1473) or 15-month (n = 1227) primary care visits. Children were screened with both the Infant/Toddler Checklist (ITC) and the First Year Inventory-Lite (FYI-L) at 12 months and FYI-L and the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F) at 15 months. After a positive screen and/or clinical concern, families were offered a no-cost diagnostic evaluation.

Results: Of the 1473 toddlers screened at 12 months, 223 screened positive and 107 attended a diagnostic evaluation. Of the 1227 children screened at 15 months, 252 screened positive and 94 attended the evaluation. Overall, specificity for autism was high (>0.94) for all screeners at 12 and 15 months. At 12-month screening, sensitivity for autism was low on the ITC (0.26) and moderate on the FYI-L (0.67). Positive predictive value (PPV) was low for both screeners (0.24 for ITC and FYI-L). At 15 months, both the FYI-L and the M-CHAT-R/F demonstrated moderate sensitivity (0.61 for FYI-L and 0.60 for the M-CHAT-R/F) and low PPV (0.16 for FYI-L and 0.31 for M-CHAT-R/F).

Conclusion: Although data do not support universal screening at younger ages, the study identifies tools that can be used at 12 and 15 months. Importantly, screening at these ages does not identify all cases of autism, and repeat screening at 18 months and beyond is essential to support autism detection as early as possible.

Objectives: Most children exhibit preliteracy skills by preschool. Children who are deaf/hard of hearing (DHH) with a language gap are at risk for delayed preliteracy skills. Our study aimed to describe preliteracy skill development in preschool-aged DHH children and investigate associated factors.

Methods: Children, aged 3 to 5 years, were included in the analysis if enrolled in randomized trials of a language intervention using augmentative and alternative communication, shown to boost language skills. Evaluations using the Clinical Evaluations of Fundamentals-Preschool Preliteracy Rating Scale (PRS) were conducted at baseline, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks. Repeated-measures models assessed changes in total PRS scores and Early Reading and Early Writing subdomains. Results were presented as least square mean values with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Forty-five children had completed pre-data and post-data. The mean nonverbal IQ was 99.3 (SD 14.3), and receptive and expressive language were 82.3 (14.9) and 76.8 (17.0), respectively. Significant ( p < 0.0001) skill growth was observed with all preliteracy outcomes, ranging from 11 to 15 points in the first 24 weeks. Increasing receptive and expressive language over time was significantly associated with increasing scores. Factors such as aided hearing thresholds, caregiver education level, and hearing device use were not significant in models.

Conclusion: Language is essential for literacy development. Language-enhancing interventions could facilitate literacy skills. Monitoring preliteracy skills in DHH children is crucial, given their increased risk for language delays. Further research is needed to support early literacy development in this population, ensuring they have the tools they need for future success.

Case: John is a 12-year-old African-American boy with a Specific Learning Disorder in Reading and Generalized Anxiety Disorder who you are seeing in follow-up at your clinic. Last fall, when John was having an escalation of his anxiety symptoms at school, he enacted the behavior intervention plan (BIP) that had been previously established by his educational team of informing his teacher that he needed to leave the classroom. He then paced the hallway outside of his classroom as a method of coping with the anxiety that he was experiencing. Approximately 3 months prior, John's teacher was unable to visualize him from her position in the classroom and subsequently called the School Resource Officer (SRO) to locate him. The SRO found John, who was in an emotionally dysregulated state. The SRO subsequently approached John who noted that he wanted to jump off a cliff. Rather than following the BIP which details the need to involve the school counselor and social worker when John is in an emotionally dysregulated state to perform a self-harm/threat assessment, the SRO bypassed this step and, instead, notified the emergency response team, who initiated a petition for psychiatric evaluation, thus temporarily limiting parental rights to make certain treatment decisions. This led to John being transported to the local Emergency Department (ED) in the backseat of a police vehicle.While in the ED, a urine toxicology assessment was performed which returned negative and John was subsequently evaluated by the child and adolescent psychiatrist on call who deemed that John was not an immediate threat to himself or others and discharged him home with his mother. Subsequent to this event, John exhibited refusal to return to school and would remain in his family's car for 30 to 60 minutes before entering the school in the morning. Once at school, he would go to an administrator's office where he felt safe, and his school work was brought to him. His long-standing therapist, who he had been seeing for management of anxiety, began providing Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing therapy with John as a trauma-focused intervention to address the events he experienced at school.John continued to exhibit school avoidance and was placed on home-bound instruction by the school in the spring, which comprised 60 minutes of special education instruction in the home each week, without provision of general education instruction. John went from being an A/B student to earning Ds and Fs, and he was denied compensatory instructional services by the school in the summer.The family comes to your DBP clinic that summer asking for evaluation of his traumatic symptoms and to create a plan for the fall and returning to school.