Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics最新文献

Objective: This study examined associations of school readiness measures obtained before school entry with academic achievement at early school age in children born very preterm (VPT, gestational age ≤ 30 weeks) and children born full term (FT, GA ≥ 37 weeks).

Method: The sample included 38 children born VPT and 30 born FT recruited at age 4 years and followed to early school age. Measures of readiness included tests of global cognition, executive function, motor abilities, and preacademic skills, as well as caregiver behavior ratings. Tests of math, reading, and spelling were administered to assess school-age achievement. Analyses that controlled for socioeconomic status and accounted for inclusion of siblings compared the groups on the achievement tests and identified measures of readiness related to school-age achievement.

Results: Achievement difficulties were more pronounced in the VPT group and associated with problems in multiple readiness domains. Effect sizes for these associations were largest for measures of spatial ability, executive function, and preacademic skills. Some associations remained significant when controlling for global cognitive ability at age 4 years, and others were significant only for the VPT group.

Conclusion: Findings suggest that deficits on tests in multiple readiness domains assessed before school entry in children born VPT or FT are associated with early school-age achievement. The most pronounced readiness deficits in the VPT group at age 4 years were also among those most closely associated with later difficulties in achievement. Further research is needed to refine assessment of school readiness in children born VPT.

Objective: Young children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) can have challenging behaviors putting them at risk for preschool expulsion and for adverse outcomes across child development, health, and education. We examined the association of preschool expulsion with ADHD symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and functioning among children with ADHD.

Methods: Using the cross-sectional National Survey of the Diagnosis and Treatment of ADHD and Tourette Syndrome on 2947 children aged 5 to 17 years ever diagnosed with ADHD, parents reported on preschool expulsion, ADHD symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and functioning. Weighted analyses included calculations of estimated means, prevalence, and prevalence ratios.

Results: Preschool expulsion was experienced by 4.4% of children ever diagnosed with ADHD (girls: 1.5%; boys: 5.7%). Children with preschool expulsion had lower mean ages at first concern about ADHD symptoms, ADHD diagnosis, and initiation of ADHD medication and had higher prevalence of severe ADHD symptoms and other mental, behavioral, or developmental disorders. A history of preschool expulsion was associated with difficulties with overall school performance, organized activities, writing, handwriting, and the parent-child relationship, but not with math, reading, or peer or sibling relationships. Children with preschool expulsion more often received school supports, behavioral classroom management, peer intervention, and social skills training.

Conclusion: Among children ever diagnosed with ADHD, history of preschool expulsion was associated with more severe ADHD symptoms, other disorders, earlier diagnosis and medication initiation, and academic and social impairment. Health care providers can use preschool expulsion as an indicator of risk for children with ADHD and connect families to effective treatments.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the developmental risks associated with total screen time, and specifically newer mobile devices, in the context of the pandemic.

Methods: This study uses parent-reported data from a prospective cohort of Canadian preschool-age children. The exposure variable is child daily screen time measured at the age of 3.5 years categorized as light (<1 hr/d), moderate (1-4 hr/d), or intensive (>4 hr/d) use (N = 315). Time spent on mobile devices was considered separately as a continuous variable. Our outcome is child global development scores, which combine assessments of communication, cognitive, personal-social, and motor skills measured at the age of 4.5 years using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) (N = 249, 79% retained). ASQ scores were dichotomized to distinguish children at risk of developmental delays (below the 15th percentile) from those not at risk. We estimate associations between child screen time and later global development using multiple regressions adjusted for child sex and temperament, and parent education. We also examine whether associations are moderated by child and parent characteristics.

Results: Logistic regressions revealed that intensive users were more at risk of global developmental delays compared with light users (OR = 4.29, p = 0.020). Mobile device use was also associated with lower global scores (β = -3.064; p = 0.028), but not with risk of delays. We found no evidence that associations were moderated by child sex and temperament, or parent education.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that intensive screen time may be associated with delays in child global development. Early childhood professionals should encourage families with preschoolers to prioritize screen-free activities to promote optimal cognitive, language, social, and motor development.

Objective: Monolingual Spanish speakers-many of whom identify as Hispanic/Latine-often experience barriers to accessing psychology services, including language access. Integrated primary care (IPC) clinics, where individuals receive psychological services within primary care, aim to improve service accessibility. However, minoritized populations are less likely to engage with these services than non-Hispanic/Latine White individuals. Few studies examine psychology treatment engagement within pediatric integrated clinics for Spanish-speaking families. This study investigated differences in psychology treatment engagement for Spanish-speaking families and the role of patient-provider language concordance within pediatric IPC.

Methods: A retrospective chart review examined data from a multiethnic sample of 887 patients (M age = 8.97 yrs, 55.69% male, 64.83% Hispanic/Latine, 6.99% non-Hispanic/Latine White, 41.71% Spanish-preferring) from an urban pediatric IPC clinic serving a high proportion of Hispanic/Latine, Spanish-speaking families. We examined the association between language preference and patient-provider language concordance on service engagement using hierarchical linear regression.

Results: Spanish-preferring families were more likely than English-preferring families to engage in psychology services. Working with a Spanish-speaking provider during an initial psychology visit was unrelated to psychology treatment engagement for Spanish-preferring families.

Conclusion: Higher engagement for Spanish-preferring families seems to reflect the clinic's reputation as a center for linguistically accessible services. While linguistic accessibility remains important, our study did not detect an effect of language concordance during the initial psychology visit and subsequent treatment engagement. The findings highlight the importance of providing culturally responsive and linguistically accessible mental health services for Spanish-speaking families.

Background and objectives: Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with lower neurocognitive scores and differences in brain structure among school-age children. Associations between positive neighborhood characteristics, infant brain activity, and cognitive development are underexplored. We examined direct and indirect associations between neighborhood opportunity, brain activity, and cognitive development.

Methods: This longitudinal cohort study included infants from 2 primary care clinics in Boston and Los Angeles. Using a sample of 65 infants, we estimated path models to examine associations between neighborhood opportunity (measured by the Child Opportunity Index), infant electroencephalography (EEG) at 6 months, and infant cognitive development (measured using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning) at 12 months. A mediation model tested whether EEG power explained associations between neighborhood opportunity and infant cognition.

Results: Neighborhood opportunity positively predicted infant absolute EEG power across multiple frequency bands: low ( b = 0.12, 95% CI 0.01-0.24, p = 0.04, = 0.21); high ( b = 0.11, 95% CI 0.01-0.21, p = 0.03, = 0.23); ( b = 0.10, 95% CI 0.00-0.19, p = 0.04, = 0.20); and ( b = 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.22, p = 0.02, = 0.24). The results remained statistically significant after applying a Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate of 0.10 to adjust for multiple comparisons. No significant associations emerged between neighborhood opportunity, relative EEG power, and infant cognition. Mediation was not significant.

Conclusion: Neighborhood opportunity is positively associated with some forms of infant brain activity, suggesting that positive neighborhood characteristics may play a salient role in early development.

Case: DL is an 8-year-old Mexican boy with a posterior atrial septal defect and partial anomalous pulmonary venous return of the right lower pulmonary vein with resultant right heart dilation with normal right ventricular systolic and diastolic function and no arrhythmias. Surgical repair was deferred, and DL's condition was being medically managed with furosemide 0.5 mg/kg BID and spironolactone 0.5 mg/kg BID.DL presents for developmental assessment due to poor performance in school following a lifting of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions and return to in-person classes. He has been attending full-time classes for 3 months without improvements in math, reading, and writing skills. Current attentional concerns at school include an inability to complete tasks without getting distracted by minimal stimuli and highly impulsive behavior.At the first assessment, DL was performing below grade expectations (e.g., reading by syllable without text comprehension, demonstrating preoperational addition and subtraction skills, inability to take dictation)-all of which was viewed as negatively impacted by attentional deficits. DL met DSM-5 criteria for ADHD, predominantly inattentive type. He was started on 10-mg immediate-release methylphenidate PO at 8 am with breakfast and a second dose of 10-mg immediate-release methylphenidate PO 4 hours after the first dose.After a month, at the first follow-up consultation, improvement in attention span, impulsivity, and school performance were observed, including reading skills and math proficiency. However, DL's mother raised concerns about circumoral cyanosis and acrocyanosis in the fingers of both hands after playing outside. These signs were not previously observed. During physical examination at the same visit, heart rate, blood pressure, and oximetry were within baseline ranges and his cardiac examination was unchanged. DL's dosage of methylphenidate was lowered to 10-mg immediate-release methylphenidate PO QD in the mornings with breakfast (8 am).DL did not return to clinic for another 2 months, having discontinued the medication after 2 months of treatment given financial limitations. His mother reported that DL's exertional circumoral cyanosis and acrocyanosis resolved while he was off medication. However, she observed an increase in inattentive symptoms and impulsivity and decline in his academic skills. She asked if our team was able continue the treatment despite the drug side effects, since she believed the benefits outweighed the disadvantages.Given these concerns, the team requested an updated cardiology assessment. The Cardiologist recommended discontinuation of methylphenidate and recommended follow-up with cardiothoracic surgery for reassessment of the surgical timeline.Given the limited treatment options in Mexico, what would you do next as the treating developmental-behavioral clinician…?

Objective: Dyslexia is characterized by difficulties with fluent word recognition, decoding, or spelling, and it has been linked to family history. Given the impact of dyslexia on broad academic activities and well-being, ensuring that information about dyslexia is accessible to affected children and their families is vital. This study aims to assess the readability levels of dyslexia-related websites, with the hypothesis that such websites should be written at an appropriate readability level to accommodate those who may also have reading challenges.

Methods: This study analyzes the readability of 50 web articles on dyslexia using 6 readability formulas: Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog Score, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index, Coleman Liau Index, and Automated Readability Index. The search term "What is dyslexia" was used on Google. Each article was analyzed using the online calculation website WebFX. The readability goal for these websites was set at fifth grade, a level recommended for patients with reading challenges.

Results: The study found that among the 50 websites, the lowest median readability score was 11.8 (corresponding to a 12th-grade level) on the SMOG Index, while the highest scores were 15.5 on both the Gunning Fog Score and the Coleman Liau Index (indicative of college-level readability). Almost none of the websites had scores below a fifth-grade level.

Conclusion: Most websites related to dyslexia are too complex. Tools such as readability metrics and sentence restructuring by AI can help make the information more accessible and understandable to the stakeholders.