Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics最新文献

Objective: Attention-deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common psychiatric disorders among children, with estimated prevalence of 7% to 15% worldwide. The aim of this analysis was to update and summarize trends in diagnosis, demographics, and drug utilization of pediatric patients with ADHD.

Methods: We used the Agency for Health care Research and Quality Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), a survey of US individuals, families, their medical providers, and employers, using datasets from 2016 to 2019. The data sources from the MEPS database included the full-year consolidated files, medical conditions files, prescribed-medicines files, and condition-event link files for each year. We summarized trends in the proportion of children, ages 17 years and younger, with a diagnosis of ADHD, demographic information and a prescription for medication known to treat ADHD. In addition, we further stratified ADHD medication use by stimulant/nonstimulant categories.

Results: There was a 1.6% and 4.7% absolute increase in children with an ADHD diagnosis and those prescribed ADHD medications, respectively, from 2016 to 2019. Most of these children were male, non-Hispanic, and on public insurance. Of the children prescribed an ADHD medication and concomitant behavioral medications, stimulants-only use was the highest (60%-67%), followed by stimulants/nonstimulants (13%-15%), stimulant/antidepressants (6%-9%), and nonstimulants only (5%-9%). The proportion of patients with ADHD in the high-income and near-poor categories increased by 4% from 2016 to 2019.

Conclusion: Diagnosis of ADHD among children is trending upward in the United States. Central nervous system stimulants, especially methylphenidate formulations, are the most prescribed ADHD medications for children 17 years and younger.

Objective: Short sleep and evening phase preference associate with impaired self-control, yet few studies have assessed the efficacy of sleep extension for improving this behavioral domain. Thus, this secondary analysis of a behavioral sleep intervention measured whether an intervention that enhanced children's sleep also affected self-control. Differences by chronotype were also explored.

Methods: Sixty-seven children (8-11 yr), who reportedly slept <9.5 hr/d, were randomized to either a control or sleep intervention condition (i.e., 4-session behavioral intervention to enhance sleep by 1-1.5 hr/night). Chronotype was assessed using the Child Chronotype Questionnaire at baseline, and self-control was assessed using the Self-Control Rating Scale (SCRS, a caregiver report) at baseline and 8 weeks postrandomization. Total sleep time (TST) was measured using wrist actigraphy for 1 week at both baseline and 8 weeks postrandomization. Partial correlations and mixed-model ANOVAs were used for statistical analyses, with age as a covariate.

Results: At baseline, children with shorter TST (r = -0.29, p = 0.02) and an evening preference (r = 0.26, p = 0.049) were perceived as having lower self-control by their caregivers. Significant condition*time interaction effects were found for TST ( p < 0.001) and SCRS score ( p = 0.046): From baseline to follow-up, children randomized to the sleep intervention exhibited a significant increase in TST and were perceived as having greater self-control by their caregiver; children randomized to the control condition exhibited no change in TST or in SCRS score. The condition*chronotype*time interaction effect was not significant.

Conclusion: A brief sleep intervention that enhanced TST also resulted in enhanced caregiver reported self-control in school-age children. Results add to the growing evidence for the importance of sleep health in children.

Objective: Forty-three percent of children younger than 5 years in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are at risk of not meeting their developmental potential. This study investigated how 3 aspects of national development (national life expectancy, education, and income levels) are associated with early childhood development by influencing 5 domains of nurturing care (caregiving, the learning environment, safety and security, nutrition, and the health of the home environment).

Methods: In total, 159,959 families with children aged 36 to 59 months living in 51 LMICs provided data. National development was measured using 3 indicators (national life expectancy, education, and income levels), and nurturing care was measured using 10 indicators that collectively captured the 5 nurturing care domains. Path analyses examined how nurturing care indicators mediated the effects of national development on early childhood development.

Results: Higher national life expectancy was directly associated with more advanced childhood development. Higher national levels of education and income were indirectly associated with more advanced childhood development through aspects of nurturing care, such as reduced caregiver psychological aggression or physical violence, increased learning materials and wired appliances in the home environment, and greater caregiver education and child height-for-age. Greater caregiver cognitive caregiving practices promoted childhood development, regardless of levels of national development.

Conclusion: Intervening to promote caregiver education, appropriate discipline strategies, cognitive caregiving practices, and family access to wired appliances, learning materials, and adequate nutrition is key to promoting childhood development in nations with lower levels of national development.

Objective: To explore Latino parents' educational values and hopes for their preschool-aged children after a clinic school readiness (SR) intervention.

Methods: Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews of Latino parents regarding their perceptions of a novel SR coaching intervention (2016-2017). Parents who received the intervention were approached for interview (n = 74); 59 postintervention interviews were completed in English or Spanish, audio recorded, transcribed, and translated into English. Iterative team-based coding and inductive thematic analysis of 47 interviews were conducted by 3 team members using Dedoose.

Results: Children were on average 4.5 years old, with the majority speaking Spanish at home (57%), and having preschool experience (81%). Mothers mostly had no paid employment (53%) and limited formal education. Four domains emerged: 1) education is valued and seen as a pathway to a successful life for children, and 2) while structural and cultural barriers exist, 3) Latino families are motivated and 4) trust providers to offer SR support. Parents suggested pediatricians could provide more SR knowledge to families and offer programs within primary care. Integration of findings are summarized in a framework for clinical practice.

Conclusion: Latino parents' trust in their pediatric providers, combined with their strong educational aspirations for their children, offers the pediatric clinic an opportunity to partner with families to reduce systemic SR barriers. Pediatric providers can support Latino parents in preparing their children for school through culturally responsive, strengths-based approaches that build on their educational aspirations, value existing SR efforts, offer SR knowledge around early literacy and math, and build connections to early childhood programs.

Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the development of a primary care professional (PCP) autism diagnosis training model and to report on outcomes related to PCP training and sustained engagement in a longitudinal learning collaborative.

Methods: We developed Accelerating the Diagnosis of Autism with Primary care Training (ADAPT), a training program to prepare PCPs to develop independent competency in evaluation of autism in children aged 14 to 48 months. ADAPT includes didactic and case-based modules and practice-based coaching delivered by an expert diagnostic specialist; after training, PCPs participate in a longitudinal learning collaborative. Aligned with competency-based medical education standards, measures of autism evaluation knowledge and diagnostic competency are collected.

Results: From 2021 to 2023, 13 PCPs completed ADAPT didactic and practicum training to reach competency in independent autism evaluation. Clinicians demonstrated significant improvement in total autism knowledge after didactic training (p = 0.02). Scoring agreement on an autism observational assessment tool between clinicians and expert diagnosticians improved over case observations and practicum evaluations. Similarly, PCPs demonstrated improved evaluation competence, moving on average from Advanced Beginner to Competent Performer as rated by expert diagnosticians. After training, PCPs attended 57% of monthly learning collaborative sessions.

Conclusion: Training PCPs to deliver autism evaluations for young children as part of tiered community-based models of care is a promising solution to address access and waitlist challenges. ADAPT is an intensive, standardized PCP training model that results in achievement of independent competency and sustained engagement in autism evaluation. Effectiveness-implementation studies are needed to ensure scalability and sustainability of training models.

Objective: The objective of this study was to quantify associations of infant 24-hour sleep duration and nighttime sleep consolidation with later child cognition.

Methods: This study included children from Project Viva, a prospective cohort in Massachusetts with (1) sleep measures in infancy (median age 6.4 months) and (2) child cognition in early childhood (median age 3.2 years) or mid-childhood (median age 7.7 years). Main exposures were parental reports of infant 24-hour sleep duration and nighttime sleep consolidation (% of total daily sleep occurring at nighttime). Cognitive outcomes were (1) early childhood vocabulary and visual-motor abilities and (2) mid-childhood verbal and nonverbal intelligence quotient (IQ), memory, and visual-motor abilities. We examined associations of infant sleep with childhood cognition using linear regression models adjusted for child sex, age, and race or ethnicity; maternal age, education, and parity; and household income.

Results: Early and mid-childhood analyses included 1102 and 969 children, respectively. Most mothers reported infant race or ethnicity as White (69%) and were college graduates (71%). The mean infant 24-hour sleep duration was 12.2 ± 2.0 hours, and the mean nighttime sleep consolidation was 76.8% ± 8.8%. Infant 24-hour sleep duration was not associated with any early or mid-childhood outcomes. Higher infant nighttime sleep consolidation was associated with higher mid-childhood verbal intelligence (β: 0.12 points per % nighttime sleep; 95% CI, 0.01-0.22), but not with any early childhood cognitive measures.

Conclusion: In this cohort, higher infant nighttime sleep consolidation was associated with higher verbal IQ in mid-childhood. Future studies should investigate causal relationships of infant sleep consolidation with child cognition among diverse populations.

Background: Although intensive multidisciplinary interventions (IMIs) provide benefits for patients with pediatric feeding disorders (PFD), access to these programs is limited and challenges faced by the programs remain unclear.

Objective: To better understand the barriers faced by existing day programs that provide IMI, disparities in patient care, and areas for improvement to better inform policy and improve access to treatment for PFD.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a leader of outpatient programs providing IMI in the United States. Data regarding leader's perspectives on disparities in patient care, barriers faced by the intensive multidisciplinary feeding day programs, and future goals and directions for their programming were collected. Afterward, a qualitative content analysis was conducted to consolidate and categorize information related to patient care, access, and barriers faced by day programs and patients with PFD.

Results: Barriers and challenges were identified at the patient, program, and systems levels. Patient-level barriers included familial resources or socioeconomic status, geographic distance from the program site, and difficulty with the time commitment, whereas program-level barriers included limited site personnel and capacity and long wait times. System-level barriers primarily center on insurance, with inconsistent coverage of services and limited payer knowledge about PFD and IMI.

Conclusion: IMIs are effective in managing PFD; however, a variety of patient-level, program-level, and systems-level factors serve as barriers for patient access to care and program success. Further research, improved reimbursement, and consensus statements on effective treatments can help improve access to and coverage for care, allowing for the development and sustainability of more programs.

Objective: To describe intake requirements among autism clinics and to assess how well intake paperwork aligns with national standards for enhancing language and literacy accessibility.

Methods: This was a survey of 126 autism clinics in the Children's Hospital Association, assessing intake processes and intake paperwork readability conducted between November 2021 and August 2022. Descriptive analyses characterized intake requirements and paperwork components. Free-text responses about intake support strategies were categorized into themes. Logistic regression models examined associations between clinic patient demographics and odds of requiring intake paperwork. Intake packet length, content, and reading grade level were examined.

Results: Of the invited clinics, 73% completed the survey. Among the participating clinics, 55% required intake paperwork before scheduling appointments, 34% offered English forms only, and 89% had no plain language forms. Clinic patient demographics were not associated with intake paperwork requirements. Analyzed intake packets (n = 67) averaged 11 pages long, and most were written above the fifth-grade reading level. Most packets solicited medical, developmental, and educational/therapy history. Many also requested psychoeducational evaluations and teacher rating forms. Reported intake support strategies for families with language or literacy needs included making ad hoc exceptions to the usual process, task shifting to outside organizations, providing support at family's request, and delegating to support staff.

Conclusion: Many autism clinics nationwide require intake paperwork before diagnostic evaluation. Many clinics offer intake paperwork in English only, and paperwork often does not meet health literacy standards. Reducing paperwork requirements and providing more routine and robust intake support may facilitate equitable access to autism diagnostic evaluations.

Objective: An expert commission has proposed the term "profound" autism for children on the spectrum who are minimally verbal or nonverbal and have intellectual disability (ID), behavioral challenges, and co-occurring conditions. It is unknown whether parents' rating of "severe" autism aligns with the definition of "profound" autism. Using the National Survey of Children's Health, we sought to (1) estimate the prevalence of parent-reported severe autism, (2) identify child characteristics that are associated with severe autism, (3) compare health care utilization, and (4) compare caregiver stress and resilience between families of children with severe versus mild/moderate autism.

Methods: Parent responses on the 2018 to 2019 NSCH were used to compare school-age children with parent-reported severe autism and those with mild/moderate autism. Descriptive statistics, χ2 tests, and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Among parents of 1,368 US children with autism, 10.1% characterized their child's autism as severe, a prevalence of 1 in 333. Parents of children with severe autism were more likely to report ID (45% vs 12.1%, p < 0.001), language delay (88% vs 58.7%, p < 0.001), and difficulties in dressing and bathing (67% vs 19.2%, p < 0.001). Children with severe autism had more behavioral problems and co-occurring conditions but were no more likely to see specialists or receive autism-specific behavioral therapy. Their caregivers reported more stress and less resilience.

Conclusion: The characteristics of "profound" autism and parent-reported "severe" autism significantly overlap, allowing the use of the NSCH for studies of this vulnerable population. Children with profound/severe autism could benefit from more behavioral therapy, specialty care, and family support.

Objectives: To investigate the relationship between food insecurity and developmental delay and/or behavior problems (DD/PB) in US children aged 2 to 5 years before the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Data from 14,464 children aged 2 to 5 years from the National Survey of Children's Health from 2016 to 2017 were analyzed. Children with food insecurity came from families reporting they sometimes or often could not afford nutritious meals. Diagnosis of DD/PB by a professional was obtained through a caregiver report.

Results: A quarter of children aged 2 to 5 years lived in food insecure homes, and 9% were diagnosed with DD/PB. Children in food insecure households were more likely to be from minoritized populations publicly insured, with single parents, without high school education, living =< 130% Federal poverty line, and receiving supplemental nutrition assistance program (SNAP) benefits (all p < 0.001). Adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, poverty, family structure, and parent education, children in food insecure households had 1.57 times the odds of being diagnosed with DD/PB compared with children in food secure households. In similarly adjusted models excluding poverty and stratified by SNAP use, homes not receiving SNAP maintained this association between food insecurity and diagnosis of DD/PB, whereas in homes receiving SNAP, the association was not significant.

Conclusion: In this population-based study, US children aged 2 to 5 years in food insecure households were more likely to be diagnosed with DD/PB compared with those in food secure households. When stratified, there was no association between food insecurity and DD/PB among those receiving SNAP; the association remained for those not receiving SNAP. The potential long-term impact of this safety net program on our most vulnerable citizens must be considered as policymakers contemplate federal spending priorities.