Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12384-0
Lachezar A Volevski, Ion Vasiloi, Nunijiati Abudureheman, Ildar Talipov, Alexander König, Kai Dielmann, Alannah C Glück, Terézia B Andrási
Background: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the treatment option of choice for almost all pathologies of the descending thoracic aorta. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of aortic pathology on the occurrence of postimplantation syndrome (PIS) after TEVAR.
Methods: Seventy-four patients undergoing TEVAR for aortic dissection (TAD, 25), aortic aneurysm (TAA, 26), and aortic rupture or perforated ulcer (TAR/PAU, 23) were included in this retrospective study. The clinical outcome measures were persistent inflammation at hospital discharge and in-hospital mortality.
Results: PIS was assessed in 22.97% of all patients, predominantly in the TAD group (P=0.03). CRP increased after TEVAR (156.6±94.5, P<0.001; 108.1±57.7, P<0.01 and 117.8±70.4, P<0.05) vs. baseline (58.1±77.5, 31.94±52.1 and 31.9±52.1 mg/L, in TAD, TAA and TAR/PAU, respectively) and this increase was more accentuated in TAD group (P<0.05). Stent-length was similar in all groups (P=0.226) but correlated with postoperative CRP only in TAD (R=0.576, P=0.013). Fresh parietal thrombus correlated with CRP (R=0.4507, P=0.0005) and is (OR=1.0883, P=0.0001), together with the pathology of aortic dissection (OR=6.2268, P=0.0288), a predictor of PIS after TEVAR. Whereas mortality (5.4%) did not correlate with PIS (P=0.38) either with aortic pathology (P=0.225), hospital stay after TEVAR was significantly prolonged by PIS (P=0.03).
Conclusions: Aortic dissection is associated with more inflammation after TEVAR than aortic aneurysm, rupture or perforated ulcer, with the amount of fresh parietal thrombus playing the most significant role in the occurrence of PIS. Importantly, PIS prolongs hospital stay but not mortality after TEVAR.
{"title":"Impact of the underlying aortic pathology on postimplantation syndrome after endovascular thoracic aortic repair.","authors":"Lachezar A Volevski, Ion Vasiloi, Nunijiati Abudureheman, Ildar Talipov, Alexander König, Kai Dielmann, Alannah C Glück, Terézia B Andrási","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12384-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12384-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the treatment option of choice for almost all pathologies of the descending thoracic aorta. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of aortic pathology on the occurrence of postimplantation syndrome (PIS) after TEVAR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-four patients undergoing TEVAR for aortic dissection (TAD, 25), aortic aneurysm (TAA, 26), and aortic rupture or perforated ulcer (TAR/PAU, 23) were included in this retrospective study. The clinical outcome measures were persistent inflammation at hospital discharge and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PIS was assessed in 22.97% of all patients, predominantly in the TAD group (P=0.03). CRP increased after TEVAR (156.6±94.5, P<0.001; 108.1±57.7, P<0.01 and 117.8±70.4, P<0.05) vs. baseline (58.1±77.5, 31.94±52.1 and 31.9±52.1 mg/L, in TAD, TAA and TAR/PAU, respectively) and this increase was more accentuated in TAD group (P<0.05). Stent-length was similar in all groups (P=0.226) but correlated with postoperative CRP only in TAD (R=0.576, P=0.013). Fresh parietal thrombus correlated with CRP (R=0.4507, P=0.0005) and is (OR=1.0883, P=0.0001), together with the pathology of aortic dissection (OR=6.2268, P=0.0288), a predictor of PIS after TEVAR. Whereas mortality (5.4%) did not correlate with PIS (P=0.38) either with aortic pathology (P=0.225), hospital stay after TEVAR was significantly prolonged by PIS (P=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Aortic dissection is associated with more inflammation after TEVAR than aortic aneurysm, rupture or perforated ulcer, with the amount of fresh parietal thrombus playing the most significant role in the occurrence of PIS. Importantly, PIS prolongs hospital stay but not mortality after TEVAR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10704680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12552-8
Katherine M Holzem, Luis A Sanchez
Advances in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are enabling the treatment of increasingly proximal pathology. While the practice of vascular surgery has thus far been mostly limited to TEVAR in zone 2 or more distally, there are emerging devices for zone 1 and zone 0 repair that do not require any further arch debranching compared with a zone 2 repair. Moreover, such devices set forth repair options for patients unable to tolerate the insult of open surgery. One zone 0 device under evaluation is the Terumo Relay®Branch (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) endovascular graft, which is an off-the-shelf device based on the Relay®Pro platform (Terumo). This double branch device uniquely features a large gate, facilitating easy cannulation that contains two locking portal stents for the innominate artery (IA) and left common carotid artery (LCCA) branch grafts. Within our institution, we have had excellent technical success with Relay®Branch (Terumo) device deployments as part of the Early Feasibility Study, and other centers outside of the USA have published results with this device in small patient series. Notably, there is still a concerning stroke rate associated with the Relay®Branch (Terumo) device, with permanent stroke rates higher than expected but similar to those for open repair. Thus, these interventions must be undertaken with careful patient selection, thorough planning, and with the guidance of a proficient endovascular aortic team. In this article, we will outline the necessary preoperative workup, highlight device features, and detail the operative strategy, with tips for technical success. These guidelines from our experience will help facilitate successful utilization of this device when it becomes widely available in practice.
胸血管内主动脉修复(TEVAR)技术的进步使得越来越多近端病变的治疗成为可能。虽然血管手术的实践到目前为止主要局限于2区或更远的远端TEVAR,但与2区修复相比,用于1区和0区修复的新设备不需要进一步的弓支分离。此外,这些装置为无法忍受开放手术的患者提供了修复选择。正在评估的一个0区设备是Terumo Relay®Branch (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan)血管内移植物,这是一种基于Relay®Pro平台(Terumo)的现成设备。这种双分支装置独特的特点是一个大的门,方便插管,包含两个锁定门静脉支架,用于无名动脉(IA)和左颈总动脉(LCCA)分支移植物。在我们的机构内,作为早期可行性研究的一部分,我们在Relay®Branch (Terumo)设备部署方面取得了出色的技术成功,美国以外的其他中心也发表了该设备在小患者系列中的结果。值得注意的是,Relay®Branch (Terumo)装置仍然存在令人担忧的冲程率,其永久冲程率高于预期,但与开放式修复的冲程率相似。因此,在进行这些干预时必须仔细选择患者,进行周密的计划,并在熟练的血管内主动脉团队的指导下进行。在本文中,我们将概述必要的术前检查,突出器械的特点,并详细介绍手术策略,以及技术成功的提示。根据我们的经验,这些指导方针将有助于在该装置在实践中广泛使用时促进其成功使用。
{"title":"Technical tips and clinical experience with the Terumo Relay®Branch aortic endovascular graft.","authors":"Katherine M Holzem, Luis A Sanchez","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12552-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12552-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advances in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are enabling the treatment of increasingly proximal pathology. While the practice of vascular surgery has thus far been mostly limited to TEVAR in zone 2 or more distally, there are emerging devices for zone 1 and zone 0 repair that do not require any further arch debranching compared with a zone 2 repair. Moreover, such devices set forth repair options for patients unable to tolerate the insult of open surgery. One zone 0 device under evaluation is the Terumo Relay<sup>®</sup>Branch (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) endovascular graft, which is an off-the-shelf device based on the Relay<sup>®</sup>Pro platform (Terumo). This double branch device uniquely features a large gate, facilitating easy cannulation that contains two locking portal stents for the innominate artery (IA) and left common carotid artery (LCCA) branch grafts. Within our institution, we have had excellent technical success with Relay<sup>®</sup>Branch (Terumo) device deployments as part of the Early Feasibility Study, and other centers outside of the USA have published results with this device in small patient series. Notably, there is still a concerning stroke rate associated with the Relay<sup>®</sup>Branch (Terumo) device, with permanent stroke rates higher than expected but similar to those for open repair. Thus, these interventions must be undertaken with careful patient selection, thorough planning, and with the guidance of a proficient endovascular aortic team. In this article, we will outline the necessary preoperative workup, highlight device features, and detail the operative strategy, with tips for technical success. These guidelines from our experience will help facilitate successful utilization of this device when it becomes widely available in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10692594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12532-2
Roberto Gabrielli, Andrea Siani, Gianluca Smedile, Anna R Rizzo, Gennaro DE Vivo, Federico Accrocca, Stefano Bartoli
Background: Data from literature confirmed the non-trivial risk associated with carotid revascularization. The purpose of this study is to evaluate carotid endarterectomy (CEA) via a mini-invasive access (3-6 cm longitudinal) incision as a viable alternative to the traditional access via a cutaneous incision (˃6 cm) in terms of nerve sparing and neck pain/disability for patients.
Methods: We performed a prospective, observational, cohort study on 796 consecutive patients who underwent CEAs. A number of 730 patients was included in the final analysis. Patients entered in two different cohorts: CEA with 3-6 cm incision was performed in N.=398 (Group A); CEA with>6 cm incision was performed in N.=398 (Group B). Entire data set is available from 382 in group A and 348 in group B. Adverse events were recorded at 30 days, 3 and 6 months after surgery. The primary purpose of this study was to identify the incidence of cranial nerve injuries and related pain (by Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire [NPq]) in both groups. Differences between groups were exploratory, only, and considered significative for P≤0.05. Secondary objectives were: death, major and minor stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI) and main duration of operation.
Results: The cumulative incidence of transient deficit of peripheral nerve in group A was 1.7% at 30 days and 19.4% in group B (RR: 0.10, 95% CI 0.07-0.1, P=0.0001) suggesting a possible benefit from mini-skin incision on nerve injuries reduction. Cranial nerve permanent injuries were identified in 0.17% of mini-incision group and 0.23% of standard group. Exploratory comparison did not demonstrate significative differences between the groups (RR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.19-2.71, P=0.63). The median NPq postoperative score was 40% in GROUP A and 79% in GROUP B (exploratory difference 39%, 95% CI 32.22-45.20%, P=0.0001, χ2: 114.007). At 6 months, NPq was 20% and 42%, respectively; exploratory differences were still present. The need to prolong the mini-incision in GROUP A to preserve the surgical outcome was 1.3%, only.
Conclusions: According to these results the mini skin incision allows a sufficient vessels exposure for dissection, endarterectomy, reconstruction of carotid artery and shunt positioning, minimizing surgical invasiveness, decreasing the incidence of temporary cervical nerve dysfunction and improving the aesthetic result with significative less pain suffered by the patients. Transverse cervical and great auricular nerves sparing decreased postoperative hypo-paresthesia in the neck, improving patient's satisfaction. These data suggest that this procedure can be considered safe. Exploratory analysis suggested that it could possibly be considered a safety alternative to standard carotid endarterectomy. A randomized controlled trial is ongoing for definitive conclusions.
背景:文献资料证实颈动脉血运重建术具有重要的风险。本研究的目的是评估颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)通过微创通道(3-6厘米纵向)切口作为传统皮肤切口(6厘米)通道的可行替代方案,在神经保留和颈部疼痛/残疾方面对患者的影响。方法:我们对796例连续接受cea的患者进行了前瞻性、观察性、队列研究。共有730名患者被纳入最终分析。患者分为两个不同的队列:n =398例(A组)行切口3-6 cm的CEA;A组382例,B组348例,记录术后30天、3个月和6个月的不良事件。本研究的主要目的是确定两组患者脑神经损伤和相关疼痛的发生率(通过Northwick Park Neck pain Questionnaire [NPq])。组间差异仅为探索性差异,P≤0.05时具有统计学意义。次要目标是:死亡、主要和次要卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)、心肌梗死(MI)和主要手术时间。结果:30 d时,A组周围神经一过性缺损的累积发生率为1.7%,B组为19.4% (RR: 0.10, 95% CI 0.07-0.1, P=0.0001),提示微创皮肤切口可能有利于减少神经损伤。小切口组颅内神经永久性损伤发生率为0.17%,标准组为0.23%。探索性比较各组间无显著差异(RR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.19-2.71, P=0.63)。术后NPq中位评分A组为40%,B组为79%(探索性差异39%,95% CI 32.22 ~ 45.20%, P=0.0001, χ2: 114.007)。6个月时,NPq分别为20%和42%;探索性差异仍然存在。在A组中,需要延长小切口以保持手术结果的只有1.3%。结论:皮肤小切口可充分暴露血管,用于剥离、动脉内膜切除术、颈动脉重建和分流定位,减少手术侵入性,减少暂时性颈神经功能障碍的发生率,改善美观效果,显著减轻患者的疼痛。保留颈横神经和耳大神经可减少术后颈部感觉异常,提高患者满意度。这些数据表明该手术可以被认为是安全的。探索性分析表明,它可能被认为是标准颈动脉内膜切除术的一种安全选择。一项随机对照试验正在进行中,以获得明确的结论。
{"title":"Role of mini access during carotid endarterectomy: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Roberto Gabrielli, Andrea Siani, Gianluca Smedile, Anna R Rizzo, Gennaro DE Vivo, Federico Accrocca, Stefano Bartoli","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12532-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12532-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data from literature confirmed the non-trivial risk associated with carotid revascularization. The purpose of this study is to evaluate carotid endarterectomy (CEA) via a mini-invasive access (3-6 cm longitudinal) incision as a viable alternative to the traditional access via a cutaneous incision (˃6 cm) in terms of nerve sparing and neck pain/disability for patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective, observational, cohort study on 796 consecutive patients who underwent CEAs. A number of 730 patients was included in the final analysis. Patients entered in two different cohorts: CEA with 3-6 cm incision was performed in N.=398 (Group A); CEA with>6 cm incision was performed in N.=398 (Group B). Entire data set is available from 382 in group A and 348 in group B. Adverse events were recorded at 30 days, 3 and 6 months after surgery. The primary purpose of this study was to identify the incidence of cranial nerve injuries and related pain (by Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire [NPq]) in both groups. Differences between groups were exploratory, only, and considered significative for P≤0.05. Secondary objectives were: death, major and minor stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI) and main duration of operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cumulative incidence of transient deficit of peripheral nerve in group A was 1.7% at 30 days and 19.4% in group B (RR: 0.10, 95% CI 0.07-0.1, P=0.0001) suggesting a possible benefit from mini-skin incision on nerve injuries reduction. Cranial nerve permanent injuries were identified in 0.17% of mini-incision group and 0.23% of standard group. Exploratory comparison did not demonstrate significative differences between the groups (RR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.19-2.71, P=0.63). The median NPq postoperative score was 40% in GROUP A and 79% in GROUP B (exploratory difference 39%, 95% CI 32.22-45.20%, P=0.0001, χ<sup>2</sup>: 114.007). At 6 months, NPq was 20% and 42%, respectively; exploratory differences were still present. The need to prolong the mini-incision in GROUP A to preserve the surgical outcome was 1.3%, only.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to these results the mini skin incision allows a sufficient vessels exposure for dissection, endarterectomy, reconstruction of carotid artery and shunt positioning, minimizing surgical invasiveness, decreasing the incidence of temporary cervical nerve dysfunction and improving the aesthetic result with significative less pain suffered by the patients. Transverse cervical and great auricular nerves sparing decreased postoperative hypo-paresthesia in the neck, improving patient's satisfaction. These data suggest that this procedure can be considered safe. Exploratory analysis suggested that it could possibly be considered a safety alternative to standard carotid endarterectomy. A randomized controlled trial is ongoing for definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10697012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12226-3
Bart Doyen, Gilles Soenens, Blandine Maurel, Adrien Hertault, Lauren Gordon, Peter Vlerick, Frank Vermassen, Teodor Grantcharov, Isabelle van Herzeele
Background: The hybrid room (HR) is a complex, high-risk environment, requiring teams (surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, technologists) to master various skills, including the 'As Low As Reasonably Achievable' principle of radiation safety. This prospective single center cohort reports the first use of the Operating Room Black Box (ORBB) in a HR. This medical data recording system captures procedural and audio-visual data to facilitate structured team performance analysis.
Methods: Patients planned for endovascular repair of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) or treatment of symptomatic iliac-femoral-popliteal atherosclerotic disease (Peripheral Vascular Interventions or PVI) were included. Validated measures and established assessment tools were used to assess (non-)technical skills, radiation safety performance and environmental distractions.
Results: Six EVAR and sixteen PVI procedures were captured. Technical performance for one EVAR was rated 19/35 on the procedure-specific scale, below the 'acceptable' score of 21. Technical skills were rated above acceptable in all PVI procedures. Shared decision making and leadership were rated highly in 12/22 cases, whereas surgical communication and nurses' task management were rated low in 14/22 cases. Team members rarely stepped back from the C-arm during digital subtraction angiography. Radiation safety behavior was scored below 'acceptable' in 14/22 cases. A median (interquartile range) number of 12 (6-23) auditory distractions was observed per procedure.
Conclusions: The ORBB facilitates holistic workplace-based assessment of endovascular performance in a HR by combining objective assessment parameters and rating scale-based evaluations. Strengths and weaknesses were identified in team members' (non-)technical and radiation safety practices. This technology has the potential to improve vascular surgical practice, though human input remains crucial. (NCT04854278).
{"title":"Assessing endovascular team performances in a hybrid room using the Black Box system: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Bart Doyen, Gilles Soenens, Blandine Maurel, Adrien Hertault, Lauren Gordon, Peter Vlerick, Frank Vermassen, Teodor Grantcharov, Isabelle van Herzeele","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12226-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12226-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The hybrid room (HR) is a complex, high-risk environment, requiring teams (surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, technologists) to master various skills, including the 'As Low As Reasonably Achievable' principle of radiation safety. This prospective single center cohort reports the first use of the Operating Room Black Box (ORBB) in a HR. This medical data recording system captures procedural and audio-visual data to facilitate structured team performance analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients planned for endovascular repair of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) or treatment of symptomatic iliac-femoral-popliteal atherosclerotic disease (Peripheral Vascular Interventions or PVI) were included. Validated measures and established assessment tools were used to assess (non-)technical skills, radiation safety performance and environmental distractions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six EVAR and sixteen PVI procedures were captured. Technical performance for one EVAR was rated 19/35 on the procedure-specific scale, below the 'acceptable' score of 21. Technical skills were rated above acceptable in all PVI procedures. Shared decision making and leadership were rated highly in 12/22 cases, whereas surgical communication and nurses' task management were rated low in 14/22 cases. Team members rarely stepped back from the C-arm during digital subtraction angiography. Radiation safety behavior was scored below 'acceptable' in 14/22 cases. A median (interquartile range) number of 12 (6-23) auditory distractions was observed per procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ORBB facilitates holistic workplace-based assessment of endovascular performance in a HR by combining objective assessment parameters and rating scale-based evaluations. Strengths and weaknesses were identified in team members' (non-)technical and radiation safety practices. This technology has the potential to improve vascular surgical practice, though human input remains crucial. (NCT04854278).</p>","PeriodicalId":50245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10740453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12445-6
Günes Dogan, Jasmin S Hanke, Khaldoon Alhumood, Riyad Tarazi, Julia Riebandt, Dominik Wiedemann, Ivan Kneževič, Axel Haverich, Daniel Zimpfer, Jan D Schmitto
Background: Total artificial heart (TAH) implantation is a rarely performed procedure. Contrarily, left ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation is rather common in many centers. As transplantation is quantitatively limited cardiac replacement with artificial hearts is a viable alternative in the treatment of severe biventricular heart failure. An alternative to TAH is the implantation of two VADs in a TAH configuration. We hereby present the first multi-center study on 3-months outcomes of patients treated by cardiectomy and placement of two HeartMate 3s in a TAH configuration.
Methods: We retrospectively investigated a cohort of 15 patients that underwent HM3-TAH-implantation at three international institutions. Follow-up was 3 months after implantation. Baseline, intra- and postoperative parameters as well as survival data and adverse events were collected.
Results: A total of 1089 days on HM3-TAH were observed. Thirty-day survival after HM3-TAH implantation was 53% (8/15) and three month survival was 40% (6/15). The longest duration on device was 274 days. Causes of death were multi-organ failure, sepsis, and neurological adverse events. No technical complications were documented. Two patients remained on the device. Four patients (26%) were successfully bridged to transplantation.
Conclusions: The implantation of two HeartMate 3s in a TAH configuration is a last resort and off-label concept in cases of extreme biventricular heart failure. In a diligently selected patient cohort, HM3-TAH implantation is a feasible method to increase the chance of survival in a severely ill patient cohort and successfully bridge patients to heart transplantation that would otherwise have died.
{"title":"Three-month outcomes after the implantation of two HeartMate 3 devices in total artificial heart configuration.","authors":"Günes Dogan, Jasmin S Hanke, Khaldoon Alhumood, Riyad Tarazi, Julia Riebandt, Dominik Wiedemann, Ivan Kneževič, Axel Haverich, Daniel Zimpfer, Jan D Schmitto","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12445-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12445-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total artificial heart (TAH) implantation is a rarely performed procedure. Contrarily, left ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation is rather common in many centers. As transplantation is quantitatively limited cardiac replacement with artificial hearts is a viable alternative in the treatment of severe biventricular heart failure. An alternative to TAH is the implantation of two VADs in a TAH configuration. We hereby present the first multi-center study on 3-months outcomes of patients treated by cardiectomy and placement of two HeartMate 3s in a TAH configuration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively investigated a cohort of 15 patients that underwent HM3-TAH-implantation at three international institutions. Follow-up was 3 months after implantation. Baseline, intra- and postoperative parameters as well as survival data and adverse events were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1089 days on HM3-TAH were observed. Thirty-day survival after HM3-TAH implantation was 53% (8/15) and three month survival was 40% (6/15). The longest duration on device was 274 days. Causes of death were multi-organ failure, sepsis, and neurological adverse events. No technical complications were documented. Two patients remained on the device. Four patients (26%) were successfully bridged to transplantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implantation of two HeartMate 3s in a TAH configuration is a last resort and off-label concept in cases of extreme biventricular heart failure. In a diligently selected patient cohort, HM3-TAH implantation is a feasible method to increase the chance of survival in a severely ill patient cohort and successfully bridge patients to heart transplantation that would otherwise have died.</p>","PeriodicalId":50245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10692595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12591-7
Thomas Mesnard, Andrea Vacirca, Gustavo S Oderich, Stephan Haulon
Endovascular aortic arch repair has been widely used in select patients who are considered high risk for open surgical repair and have suitable anatomy. The anatomical challenges of placement of stent-grafts in the ascending aorta are many, including the curved configuration, short landing zone, proximity to the aortic valve and coronary arteries and need to incorporate the supra-aortic trunks. Stent-graft designs with fenestrations and/or directional branches are applicable to patients who have suitable landing zones in the aorta and supra-aortic trunks, adequate access and absence of significant atheromatous debris. These devices include single and multibranch concepts, which are used in combination or not with cervical debranching procedures. This article summarizes the most commonly used anatomical criterion with currently utilized arch branch stent-grafts.
{"title":"Patient selection and anatomical considerations for zone 0 endovascular aneurysm arch repair.","authors":"Thomas Mesnard, Andrea Vacirca, Gustavo S Oderich, Stephan Haulon","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12591-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12591-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endovascular aortic arch repair has been widely used in select patients who are considered high risk for open surgical repair and have suitable anatomy. The anatomical challenges of placement of stent-grafts in the ascending aorta are many, including the curved configuration, short landing zone, proximity to the aortic valve and coronary arteries and need to incorporate the supra-aortic trunks. Stent-graft designs with fenestrations and/or directional branches are applicable to patients who have suitable landing zones in the aorta and supra-aortic trunks, adequate access and absence of significant atheromatous debris. These devices include single and multibranch concepts, which are used in combination or not with cervical debranching procedures. This article summarizes the most commonly used anatomical criterion with currently utilized arch branch stent-grafts.</p>","PeriodicalId":50245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10692592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12602-9
Gustavo S Oderich
{"title":"Endovascular arch repair: where do we stand? An editorial introduction.","authors":"Gustavo S Oderich","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12602-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12602-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10727539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12210-X
Nuno Vieira-Cardoso, António Pereira-Neves, Mariana Fragão-Marques, Luís Duarte-Gamas, Diogo Domingues-Monteiro, José Vidoedo, Pedro Reis, José Teixeira, José P Andrade, João Rocha-Neves
Background: Aortoiliac peripheral artery disease may lead to disabling lower limb claudication or to lower limb chronic threatening ischemia, which is associated with increased short and long-term morbi-mortality. The red blood cell distribution width-coefficient of variation (RDW-CV) has been able to predict outcomes in other atherosclerotic diseases, such as myocardial infarction and stroke. The main objective of this study was to assess the predictive ability of perioperative RDW-CV in accurately predicting short and long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality in patients submitted to aortoiliac revascularization due to extensive aortoiliac atherosclerotic disease.
Methods: From 2013 to 2020, patients who underwent aortoiliac revascularization due to severe aortoiliac disease were included in a prospective cohort. Blood samples were taken preoperatively and the patient's demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative outcomes were assessed. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to adjust for confounding and assess the independent effect of these prognostic factors on the outcomes.
Results: The study group included 107 patients. Median follow-up was 57 (95% CI: 34.4-69.6) months. Preoperative RDW-CV was increased in thirty-eight patients (35.5%). Increased RDW-CV was associated with congestive heart failure - adjusted odds ratio of 5.043 (95% CI: 1.436-17.717, P=0.012). It could predict long-term occurrence of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.065, 95% CI: 1.014-1.118, P=0.011), all-cause mortality (aHR=1.069, 95% CI: 1.014-1.126, P=0.013), acute heart failure (AHF) (aHR=1.569, 95% CI: 1.179-2.088, P=0.002), and stroke (aHR=1.343, 95% CI: 1.044-1.727, P=0.022).
Conclusions: RDW is a widely available and low-cost marker that was able to independently predict long-term AHF, stroke, MACE, and all-cause mortality in patients with extensive aortoiliac disease submitted to revascularization. This biomarker could help assess which patients would likely benefit from stricter follow-up in the long-term.
{"title":"Red blood cell distribution width as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes in extensive aortoiliac disease.","authors":"Nuno Vieira-Cardoso, António Pereira-Neves, Mariana Fragão-Marques, Luís Duarte-Gamas, Diogo Domingues-Monteiro, José Vidoedo, Pedro Reis, José Teixeira, José P Andrade, João Rocha-Neves","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12210-X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12210-X","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aortoiliac peripheral artery disease may lead to disabling lower limb claudication or to lower limb chronic threatening ischemia, which is associated with increased short and long-term morbi-mortality. The red blood cell distribution width-coefficient of variation (RDW-CV) has been able to predict outcomes in other atherosclerotic diseases, such as myocardial infarction and stroke. The main objective of this study was to assess the predictive ability of perioperative RDW-CV in accurately predicting short and long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality in patients submitted to aortoiliac revascularization due to extensive aortoiliac atherosclerotic disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2013 to 2020, patients who underwent aortoiliac revascularization due to severe aortoiliac disease were included in a prospective cohort. Blood samples were taken preoperatively and the patient's demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative outcomes were assessed. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to adjust for confounding and assess the independent effect of these prognostic factors on the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study group included 107 patients. Median follow-up was 57 (95% CI: 34.4-69.6) months. Preoperative RDW-CV was increased in thirty-eight patients (35.5%). Increased RDW-CV was associated with congestive heart failure - adjusted odds ratio of 5.043 (95% CI: 1.436-17.717, P=0.012). It could predict long-term occurrence of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.065, 95% CI: 1.014-1.118, P=0.011), all-cause mortality (aHR=1.069, 95% CI: 1.014-1.126, P=0.013), acute heart failure (AHF) (aHR=1.569, 95% CI: 1.179-2.088, P=0.002), and stroke (aHR=1.343, 95% CI: 1.044-1.727, P=0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RDW is a widely available and low-cost marker that was able to independently predict long-term AHF, stroke, MACE, and all-cause mortality in patients with extensive aortoiliac disease submitted to revascularization. This biomarker could help assess which patients would likely benefit from stricter follow-up in the long-term.</p>","PeriodicalId":50245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10695880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12569-3
Emanuel R Tenorio, Andrea Vacirca, Thomas Mesnard, Titia Sulzer, Aidin Baghbani-Oskouei, Aleem K Mirza, Ying Huang, Gustavo S Oderich
Open surgical repair remains the gold standard for treatment for aortic arch diseases, but these operations can be associated with wide heterogeneity in outcomes and significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in elderly patients with severe comorbidities or those who had prior arch procedures via median sternotomy. Endovascular repair has been introduced as a less invasive alternative to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with open surgical repair. The technique evolved with new device designs using up to three inner branches for incorporation of the supra-aortic trunks. This manuscript summarizes technical tips and clinical experience with the triple inner arch branch stent graft for total endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies.
{"title":"Technical tips and clinical experience with the Cook Triple inner arch branch stent-graft.","authors":"Emanuel R Tenorio, Andrea Vacirca, Thomas Mesnard, Titia Sulzer, Aidin Baghbani-Oskouei, Aleem K Mirza, Ying Huang, Gustavo S Oderich","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12569-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12569-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Open surgical repair remains the gold standard for treatment for aortic arch diseases, but these operations can be associated with wide heterogeneity in outcomes and significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in elderly patients with severe comorbidities or those who had prior arch procedures via median sternotomy. Endovascular repair has been introduced as a less invasive alternative to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with open surgical repair. The technique evolved with new device designs using up to three inner branches for incorporation of the supra-aortic trunks. This manuscript summarizes technical tips and clinical experience with the triple inner arch branch stent graft for total endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10701882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12170-1
Maurizio Domanin, Lorenzo Bennati, Christian Vergara, Daniele Bissacco, Chiara Malloggi, Vincenzo Silani, Gianfranco Parati, Santi Trimarchi, Renato Casana
Background: In asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS), different plaque types, i.e. lipidic (LP), fibrous (FP), and calcific (CP), could have different hemodynamic and structural behaviors.
Methods: Different carotid plaques, reconstructed from medical imaging of ACS >70%, were analyzed by computing fluid structure interaction (FSI), modeling the spatial distribution of wall shear stresses (WSS), plaque displacements (D), von Mises stresses (VMS), and absorbed elastic energy (AEE) together with their maximum-in-space values at the systole (WSSsyst, Dsyst, VMSsyst and AEEsyst).
Results: WSS resulted significantly higher in CP, whereas D and VMS showed the highest values for LP. Regarding AEEsyst stored by the plaques, LP absorbed in average 2320 J/m3, FP 408 J/m3 (470%) and CP 99 J/m3 (2240%), (P<0.01, P<0.01, and P<0.01, respectively).
Conclusions: Depending upon their nature, plaques store different deformations and inner distributions of forces, thus potentially influencing their vulnerability.
{"title":"Fluid structure interaction analysis to stratify the behavior of different atheromatous carotid plaques.","authors":"Maurizio Domanin, Lorenzo Bennati, Christian Vergara, Daniele Bissacco, Chiara Malloggi, Vincenzo Silani, Gianfranco Parati, Santi Trimarchi, Renato Casana","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12170-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12170-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS), different plaque types, i.e. lipidic (LP), fibrous (FP), and calcific (CP), could have different hemodynamic and structural behaviors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Different carotid plaques, reconstructed from medical imaging of ACS >70%, were analyzed by computing fluid structure interaction (FSI), modeling the spatial distribution of wall shear stresses (WSS), plaque displacements (D), von Mises stresses (VMS), and absorbed elastic energy (AEE) together with their maximum-in-space values at the systole (WSS<inf>syst</inf>, D<inf>syst</inf>, VMS<inf>syst</inf> and AEE<inf>syst</inf>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WSS resulted significantly higher in CP, whereas D and VMS showed the highest values for LP. Regarding AEE<inf>syst</inf> stored by the plaques, LP absorbed in average 2320 J/m<sup>3</sup>, FP 408 J/m<sup>3</sup> (470%) and CP 99 J/m<sup>3</sup> (2240%), (P<0.01, P<0.01, and P<0.01, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Depending upon their nature, plaques store different deformations and inner distributions of forces, thus potentially influencing their vulnerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":50245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10695866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}