Mac L. Chamberlain, Alex Kacelnik, Autumn Bush, Mark E. Hauber
Behavioral imprinting is a learning phenomenon by which animals acquire preferences for stimuli through perceptual exposure during critical periods, without substantial external reinforcement. Since being acknowledged in 1516 by Sir Thomas More in artificially incubated domestic chickens, imprinting has been reported in diverse species, across various sensory modalities, and during different life-history stages. Due to this diversity, imprinting research uses highly varied methodologies, with distinctive differences between the methods employed for different types of imprinting. We systematically review relevant literature, identifying and describing the range of methodologies used to study imprinting across taxa and modalities. After compiling a representative dataset of 192 behavioral imprinting-focused experiments, we categorize studies by imprinting sensory modality, focal species, ontogenetic stage addressed, and methods applied for both exposure and testing. The majority of studies in the sample focus on filial imprinting in precocial birds but nonfilial types, such as sexual or home range imprinting in altricial and non-avian species, are also present, albeit at far lower proportions. Filial imprinting is studied across different sensory modalities, mostly through applying artificial stimuli, but nonfilial imprinting studies mainly use live animals as stimuli, without isolating the relevant sensory modalities. Most studies of filial imprinting measure preference by spatial proximity, following response, or the suppression of a fear response, whereas most studies of sexual imprinting employ the attempt frequency of sexual behaviors. Finally, we analyze the relative frequencies of methodological approaches in each imprinting category, to highlight potential biases due to uneven research effort rather than intrinsic biology. The patterns and biases in imprinting methodologies that we uncover hamper attempts to establish whether different forms of imprinting share mechanistic foundations, including whether imprinting constitutes a biologically meaningful learning category.
{"title":"A systematic review of methodologies for studying behavioral imprinting","authors":"Mac L. Chamberlain, Alex Kacelnik, Autumn Bush, Mark E. Hauber","doi":"10.1111/eth.13416","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eth.13416","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Behavioral imprinting is a learning phenomenon by which animals acquire preferences for stimuli through perceptual exposure during critical periods, without substantial external reinforcement. Since being acknowledged in 1516 by Sir Thomas More in artificially incubated domestic chickens, imprinting has been reported in diverse species, across various sensory modalities, and during different life-history stages. Due to this diversity, imprinting research uses highly varied methodologies, with distinctive differences between the methods employed for different types of imprinting. We systematically review relevant literature, identifying and describing the range of methodologies used to study imprinting across taxa and modalities. After compiling a representative dataset of 192 behavioral imprinting-focused experiments, we categorize studies by imprinting sensory modality, focal species, ontogenetic stage addressed, and methods applied for both exposure and testing. The majority of studies in the sample focus on filial imprinting in precocial birds but nonfilial types, such as sexual or home range imprinting in altricial and non-avian species, are also present, albeit at far lower proportions. Filial imprinting is studied across different sensory modalities, mostly through applying artificial stimuli, but nonfilial imprinting studies mainly use live animals as stimuli, without isolating the relevant sensory modalities. Most studies of filial imprinting measure preference by spatial proximity, following response, or the suppression of a fear response, whereas most studies of sexual imprinting employ the attempt frequency of sexual behaviors. Finally, we analyze the relative frequencies of methodological approaches in each imprinting category, to highlight potential biases due to uneven research effort rather than intrinsic biology. The patterns and biases in imprinting methodologies that we uncover hamper attempts to establish whether different forms of imprinting share mechanistic foundations, including whether imprinting constitutes a biologically meaningful learning category.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136032683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Julia C. Pierry, Maria E. Morete, Emygdio L. A. Monteiro-Filho, Clarissa R. Teixeira
The behavioral plasticity among and within cetacean species can be driven by their prey sources, local adaptations to environmental features, and/or interactions with human activities. One of the tactics displayed by cetaceans is the barrier feeding, in which individuals or groups herd fish schools against natural and non-natural barriers to restrict movements of their prey. Coastal odontocetes, for example, are known for using shorelines and underwater slopes to trap their prey. Here, we documented two distinct populations of Guiana dolphin using the mangrove margins as a natural barrier to herd and capture fish. The observations took place in the Cananéia estuary, São Paulo State, southeastern Brazil, and in the Paranaguá estuary, Paraná State, southern Brazil. A total of 63 dolphins over eight encounters were observed performing six different events using mangroves as a natural barrier, summing both study areas. These findings not only expand our understanding of the behavior plasticity of the species but also call attention to the importance of the mangrove ecosystem directly to Guiana dolphins and indirectly to the components of their food web.
{"title":"Guiana dolphins use mangrove margins as a natural barrier to chase fish prey","authors":"Julia C. Pierry, Maria E. Morete, Emygdio L. A. Monteiro-Filho, Clarissa R. Teixeira","doi":"10.1111/eth.13411","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eth.13411","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The behavioral plasticity among and within cetacean species can be driven by their prey sources, local adaptations to environmental features, and/or interactions with human activities. One of the tactics displayed by cetaceans is the barrier feeding, in which individuals or groups herd fish schools against natural and non-natural barriers to restrict movements of their prey. Coastal odontocetes, for example, are known for using shorelines and underwater slopes to trap their prey. Here, we documented two distinct populations of Guiana dolphin using the mangrove margins as a natural barrier to herd and capture fish. The observations took place in the Cananéia estuary, São Paulo State, southeastern Brazil, and in the Paranaguá estuary, Paraná State, southern Brazil. A total of 63 dolphins over eight encounters were observed performing six different events using mangroves as a natural barrier, summing both study areas. These findings not only expand our understanding of the behavior plasticity of the species but also call attention to the importance of the mangrove ecosystem directly to Guiana dolphins and indirectly to the components of their food web.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135803749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Taylor L. Rystrom, Yvonne Wesseler, S. Helene Richter, Norbert Sachser, Sylvia Kaiser
Adolescence is a sensitive phase when cues from the social environment can shape consistent individual differences in behavioral and hormonal profiles, but the effect of the social partner on these phenotypes is not well-understood, especially for females. We therefore aimed to investigate whether the age class and sex of the housing partner affect social behavior and cortisol concentrations in female guinea pigs during adolescence and estimate the repeatability of cortisol concentrations in this life stage. Female guinea pigs were housed upon weaning for 4 weeks with either an adult female, adolescent female, or adolescent male. Social behavior was observed in the home enclosure and a preference test and social interaction test were carried out at the end of the experiment. Cortisol concentrations (baseline and response to a challenge) were measured prior to the start of the experiment and 2 and 4 weeks after pair formation. We hypothesized that the social partner would affect behavior and cortisol concentrations. We found that females housed with an adult female were less aggressive and more consistently displaced by their housing partner than females housed with an adolescent female. Sex of the housing partner did not affect focal female behavior. Regarding hormones, baseline cortisol concentration was neither significantly repeatable nor significantly affected by the housing partner. However, cortisol responsiveness was highly repeatable both 1 h and 2 h after the onset of a challenge. The age class of the housing partner affected cortisol responsiveness, with higher cortisol concentrations measured at 1 h in females housed with an adult female. These results indicate that adolescent female guinea pigs exhibit consistent individual differences in cortisol responsiveness while retaining plasticity to adjust to cues from the social environment. Taken together, we show in a female rodent that the social environment can significantly shape behavioral and endocrine parameters during adolescence.
{"title":"Shaped by you: The effect of social partner on cortisol and behavior during adolescence in a female rodent","authors":"Taylor L. Rystrom, Yvonne Wesseler, S. Helene Richter, Norbert Sachser, Sylvia Kaiser","doi":"10.1111/eth.13414","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eth.13414","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Adolescence is a sensitive phase when cues from the social environment can shape consistent individual differences in behavioral and hormonal profiles, but the effect of the social partner on these phenotypes is not well-understood, especially for females. We therefore aimed to investigate whether the age class and sex of the housing partner affect social behavior and cortisol concentrations in female guinea pigs during adolescence and estimate the repeatability of cortisol concentrations in this life stage. Female guinea pigs were housed upon weaning for 4 weeks with either an adult female, adolescent female, or adolescent male. Social behavior was observed in the home enclosure and a preference test and social interaction test were carried out at the end of the experiment. Cortisol concentrations (baseline and response to a challenge) were measured prior to the start of the experiment and 2 and 4 weeks after pair formation. We hypothesized that the social partner would affect behavior and cortisol concentrations. We found that females housed with an adult female were less aggressive and more consistently displaced by their housing partner than females housed with an adolescent female. Sex of the housing partner did not affect focal female behavior. Regarding hormones, baseline cortisol concentration was neither significantly repeatable nor significantly affected by the housing partner. However, cortisol responsiveness was highly repeatable both 1 h and 2 h after the onset of a challenge. The age class of the housing partner affected cortisol responsiveness, with higher cortisol concentrations measured at 1 h in females housed with an adult female. These results indicate that adolescent female guinea pigs exhibit consistent individual differences in cortisol responsiveness while retaining plasticity to adjust to cues from the social environment. Taken together, we show in a female rodent that the social environment can significantly shape behavioral and endocrine parameters during adolescence.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13414","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135918930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Facundo Fernandez-Duque, Eliot T. Miller, Matias Fernandez-Duque, Jay Falk, Gabriela Venable, Sophie Rabinowicz, C. Dustin Becker, Mark E. Hauber
Competition over resources often leads to intra- and interspecific interactions, which can be detrimental to the individuals involved. Thus, natural selection should favor communication systems that reliably convey information regarding the relative competitive abilities of an individual, reducing the need for physically damaging confrontation. Body size, sex, age, relatedness, and ornamentation are important factors determining dominance across diverse taxa in intraspecific interactions. These traits, when perceptible, may serve as signals across species in guilds that have frequent interspecific interactions. Hummingbirds provide a tractable system to study such community dynamics due to their high frequency of interactions, variable ornamentation, diverse body sizes, fast metabolism, and large overlap in resource utilization. Even in this system, potential interactions between morphology and coloration are rarely accounted for together when analyzing dominance between species. We take a novel approach to understanding interspecific dominance by assessing behavior, morphology, and coloration across different types of behavioral interactions. Across 11 tropical montane hummingbird species, we find that dominance is predicted by wing size and some metrics of plumage coloration. However, the biological significance of these factors varies between the different dominance behaviors performed. These results inform our understanding of interspecific signaling and its role in the evolution of intraguild communication and resource competition.
{"title":"Phenotype predicts interspecific dominance hierarchies in a cloud-forest hummingbird guild","authors":"Facundo Fernandez-Duque, Eliot T. Miller, Matias Fernandez-Duque, Jay Falk, Gabriela Venable, Sophie Rabinowicz, C. Dustin Becker, Mark E. Hauber","doi":"10.1111/eth.13410","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eth.13410","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Competition over resources often leads to intra- and interspecific interactions, which can be detrimental to the individuals involved. Thus, natural selection should favor communication systems that reliably convey information regarding the relative competitive abilities of an individual, reducing the need for physically damaging confrontation. Body size, sex, age, relatedness, and ornamentation are important factors determining dominance across diverse taxa in intraspecific interactions. These traits, when perceptible, may serve as signals across species in guilds that have frequent interspecific interactions. Hummingbirds provide a tractable system to study such community dynamics due to their high frequency of interactions, variable ornamentation, diverse body sizes, fast metabolism, and large overlap in resource utilization. Even in this system, potential interactions between morphology and coloration are rarely accounted for together when analyzing dominance between species. We take a novel approach to understanding interspecific dominance by assessing behavior, morphology, and coloration across different types of behavioral interactions. Across 11 tropical montane hummingbird species, we find that dominance is predicted by wing size and some metrics of plumage coloration. However, the biological significance of these factors varies between the different dominance behaviors performed. These results inform our understanding of interspecific signaling and its role in the evolution of intraguild communication and resource competition.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13410","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135917856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maria Cristina Lorenzi, Picchi Laura, Ricci-Bonot Claire, Jeanne Elise
Reciprocity, one of the evolutionary explanations for cooperation, evolves between individuals when helping is conditional upon receiving help in return (“A helps B because B helped A before”). Often tested in controlled laboratory conditions, its robustness to external disturbances has rarely been evaluated. Here, we investigated whether reciprocity is robust when disturbances occur in between the donation by one individual and its return by a partner. As model system, we used a simultaneously hermaphroditic polychaete worm (Ophryotrocha diadema), where partners in isolated dyads engage in iterated exchanges of eggs for sperm (eggs are a costly donation relatively to sperm). If a partner donates eggs and the other fertilizes them, the latter is likely to donate eggs a couple of days later. (Eggs and larvae are then cared by the parents which sit at the nest and only leave it for foraging.) We removed the eggs from the nests daily or weekly and found that reciprocity decisions were not substantially altered; focal worms were more likely to lay if the partner laid before. We also found that, irrespective of treatment, worms exchanged comparable number of eggs, and were stimulated to lay significantly sooner if the partners laid a second clutch before they reciprocated. These results show that reciprocity is robust to disturbances which may happen in the 2 days’ time gap between egg donation and egg reciprocation.
互惠是合作的进化解释之一,当帮助以获得回报为条件时("A 帮助 B 是因为 B 曾经帮助过 A"),个体之间就会产生互惠。互惠通常在可控的实验室条件下进行测试,但其对外部干扰的稳健性却很少进行评估。在这里,我们研究了当一个人的捐赠和另一个人的回报之间发生干扰时,互惠是否具有稳健性。作为模型系统,我们使用了一种同时雌雄同体的多毛类蠕虫(Ophryotrocha diadema),在这种蠕虫中,孤立的两对中的伙伴会反复进行卵子与精子的交换(相对于精子而言,卵子的捐赠成本较高)。如果一方捐献卵子,另一方使其受精,那么后者很可能在几天后捐献卵子。(卵和幼虫随后由坐在巢中的亲鸟照料,亲鸟只有在觅食时才会离开巢穴)。我们每天或每周从巢中取出虫卵,发现互惠决定并没有发生重大改变;如果伴侣在之前产卵,则焦点虫更有可能产卵。我们还发现,无论处理方式如何,蠕虫交换的卵数量相当,而且如果伴侣在互惠之前产下第二窝卵,蠕虫产卵时间会明显提前。这些结果表明,互惠对捐卵和互惠之间的两天时间间隔内可能发生的干扰具有稳健性。
{"title":"Conditional reciprocity in invertebrates is robust to disturbances","authors":"Maria Cristina Lorenzi, Picchi Laura, Ricci-Bonot Claire, Jeanne Elise","doi":"10.1111/eth.13415","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eth.13415","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reciprocity, one of the evolutionary explanations for cooperation, evolves between individuals when helping is conditional upon receiving help in return (“A helps B because B helped A before”). Often tested in controlled laboratory conditions, its robustness to external disturbances has rarely been evaluated. Here, we investigated whether reciprocity is robust when disturbances occur in between the donation by one individual and its return by a partner. As model system, we used a simultaneously hermaphroditic polychaete worm (<i>Ophryotrocha diadema</i>), where partners in isolated dyads engage in iterated exchanges of eggs for sperm (eggs are a costly donation relatively to sperm). If a partner donates eggs and the other fertilizes them, the latter is likely to donate eggs a couple of days later. (Eggs and larvae are then cared by the parents which sit at the nest and only leave it for foraging.) We removed the eggs from the nests daily or weekly and found that reciprocity decisions were not substantially altered; focal worms were more likely to lay if the partner laid before. We also found that, irrespective of treatment, worms exchanged comparable number of eggs, and were stimulated to lay significantly sooner if the partners laid a second clutch before they reciprocated. These results show that reciprocity is robust to disturbances which may happen in the 2 days’ time gap between egg donation and egg reciprocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"130 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135967874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michał Budka, Patryk Kokociński, Tomasz Stanisław Osiejuk
Duets are one of the most complex forms of acoustic displays, involving two individuals vocalising in a coordinated way to defend resources cooperatively. However, motivation to defend resources may be sex specific and variable in time and space, which should be reflected in the changes in duet singing behaviour. We experimentally examined whether the motivation to defend resources is sex specific and seasonally variable in an Afrotropical, sedentary songbird living in pairs or small groups—the Chubb's cisticola. We broadcasted songs of males, females and duets in a random order, both at the beginning and the end of the breeding season. We quantified the birds' responses from the perspective of the entire group as well as its individual members. We found cooperative responses to each type of intruder, with the birds flying and singing. Groups consisting of two to four individuals responded significantly more strongly towards intrusions by females than pairs, and at the beginning than at the end of breeding season. Solo syllables comprised less than 4% of all recorded syllables, and in most cases were sung within a song also containing duet and chorus syllables (only 12 from 1773 songs analysed were solo songs). Males sang solo syllables more often than females (83% vs. 17% of all solo syllables) and did it significantly more often towards intruding females than males or pairs. The number of solo syllables sung by females was independent of treatment and season. Together, our results suggests that Chubb's cisticola uses duets to cooperatively defend resources located within its territory, but the intensity of reaction is sex specific and seasonally variable. We suggest that defended resources could be mates, group stability or reproductive effort. Looking at the function of duets from the perspective of the group and its particular members, various stages of the season and different resources defended by birds allow for a better understanding of cooperative singing.
{"title":"Seasonally variable and sex-specific motivation for cooperative resource defence in a duetting songbird—The Chubb's cisticola","authors":"Michał Budka, Patryk Kokociński, Tomasz Stanisław Osiejuk","doi":"10.1111/eth.13409","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eth.13409","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Duets are one of the most complex forms of acoustic displays, involving two individuals vocalising in a coordinated way to defend resources cooperatively. However, motivation to defend resources may be sex specific and variable in time and space, which should be reflected in the changes in duet singing behaviour. We experimentally examined whether the motivation to defend resources is sex specific and seasonally variable in an Afrotropical, sedentary songbird living in pairs or small groups—the Chubb's cisticola. We broadcasted songs of males, females and duets in a random order, both at the beginning and the end of the breeding season. We quantified the birds' responses from the perspective of the entire group as well as its individual members. We found cooperative responses to each type of intruder, with the birds flying and singing. Groups consisting of two to four individuals responded significantly more strongly towards intrusions by females than pairs, and at the beginning than at the end of breeding season. Solo syllables comprised less than 4% of all recorded syllables, and in most cases were sung within a song also containing duet and chorus syllables (only 12 from 1773 songs analysed were solo songs). Males sang solo syllables more often than females (83% vs. 17% of all solo syllables) and did it significantly more often towards intruding females than males or pairs. The number of solo syllables sung by females was independent of treatment and season. Together, our results suggests that Chubb's cisticola uses duets to cooperatively defend resources located within its territory, but the intensity of reaction is sex specific and seasonally variable. We suggest that defended resources could be mates, group stability or reproductive effort. Looking at the function of duets from the perspective of the group and its particular members, various stages of the season and different resources defended by birds allow for a better understanding of cooperative singing.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135252977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gabriele Schino, Carola Manzoni, Massimiliano Di Giovanni
The cognitive constraint hypothesis maintains reciprocity is rare among animals because it requires cognitive capabilities that are rare, if not absent, in animals. In particular, it suggests that temporal discounting, limited memory, and limited capability of complex calculations make long-term reciprocation essentially impossible for animals. The cognitive constraint hypothesis therefore predicts that, if reciprocity ever occurs in animals, it should always be immediate. In this study, we tested for long-term reciprocation in Himalayan tahr (Hemitragus jemlahicus), a species that is not notable for its advanced cognitive capabilities. We showed that tahr are able to reciprocate grooming over extended time periods, that is, that they groom preferentially those individuals from which they receive more grooming even when all cases of immediate reciprocation are excluded from analysis. These results do not support the cognitive constraint hypothesis. We note the cognitive constraint hypothesis makes two silent assumptions: that all reciprocation is necessarily calculated and that it is based on partner control processes. We suggest these assumptions are unwarranted, and that most group living animals base their ability to reciprocate on emotionally based partner choice.
{"title":"Grooming reciprocation in Himalayan tahr and the cognitive constraint hypothesis","authors":"Gabriele Schino, Carola Manzoni, Massimiliano Di Giovanni","doi":"10.1111/eth.13408","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eth.13408","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The cognitive constraint hypothesis maintains reciprocity is rare among animals because it requires cognitive capabilities that are rare, if not absent, in animals. In particular, it suggests that temporal discounting, limited memory, and limited capability of complex calculations make long-term reciprocation essentially impossible for animals. The cognitive constraint hypothesis therefore predicts that, if reciprocity ever occurs in animals, it should always be immediate. In this study, we tested for long-term reciprocation in Himalayan tahr (<i>Hemitragus jemlahicus</i>), a species that is not notable for its advanced cognitive capabilities. We showed that tahr are able to reciprocate grooming over extended time periods, that is, that they groom preferentially those individuals from which they receive more grooming even when all cases of immediate reciprocation are excluded from analysis. These results do not support the cognitive constraint hypothesis. We note the cognitive constraint hypothesis makes two silent assumptions: that all reciprocation is necessarily calculated and that it is based on partner control processes. We suggest these assumptions are unwarranted, and that most group living animals base their ability to reciprocate on emotionally based partner choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"130 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13408","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135254633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Oliver Schülke, Eva-Maria Rathke, Andreas Berghänel, Julia Ostner
Reciprocity in the form of contingent exchanges of goods and services is widespread across animals. While there is ample evidence for helping to be contingent upon the help received from a partner, less attention has been paid to partner avoidance based on harm inflicted by a partner. Here, we investigated whether partner choice for agonistic support against powerful targets is guided by loyalty received, i.e., the tendency to refrain from attacking the subject in a coalition with any third partner. We further assessed whether loyalty received by all cooperation partners may generate increased levels of betweenness in the coalition network of a group, a measure of indirect connectedness that has previously been associated with fitness benefits. Based on observational data from male coalitions against male group mates in Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus), loyalty received was found to predict the frequency of cooperation in coalitions and the loyalty given to a partner. We propose that loyalty-guided reciprocity will be favored in species with rank-changing coalitions where defection is particularly risky. The more loyal a male's cooperation partners were, the more central he was in the coalition network in terms of higher in betweenness, suggesting a cognitively simple strategy underlying complex network positioning. Analyses of simulated data suggest strong correlations of loyalty and betweenness to be more prevalent in the relatively small groups characteristic of many primate species.
{"title":"Male Barbary macaques choose loyal coalition partners which may increase their coalition network betweenness","authors":"Oliver Schülke, Eva-Maria Rathke, Andreas Berghänel, Julia Ostner","doi":"10.1111/eth.13413","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eth.13413","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reciprocity in the form of contingent exchanges of goods and services is widespread across animals. While there is ample evidence for helping to be contingent upon the help received from a partner, less attention has been paid to partner avoidance based on harm inflicted by a partner. Here, we investigated whether partner choice for agonistic support against powerful targets is guided by loyalty received, i.e., the tendency to refrain from attacking the subject in a coalition with any third partner. We further assessed whether loyalty received by all cooperation partners may generate increased levels of betweenness in the coalition network of a group, a measure of indirect connectedness that has previously been associated with fitness benefits. Based on observational data from male coalitions against male group mates in Barbary macaques (<i>Macaca sylvanus</i>), loyalty received was found to predict the frequency of cooperation in coalitions and the loyalty given to a partner. We propose that loyalty-guided reciprocity will be favored in species with rank-changing coalitions where defection is particularly risky. The more loyal a male's cooperation partners were, the more central he was in the coalition network in terms of higher in betweenness, suggesting a cognitively simple strategy underlying complex network positioning. Analyses of simulated data suggest strong correlations of loyalty and betweenness to be more prevalent in the relatively small groups characteristic of many primate species.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"130 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13413","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135590469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>The subject of brood parasitism has become the focus of widespread attention for the numerous finely tuned adaptations that have been discovered in coevolving specialist brood parasite–host systems (Davies, <span>2000</span>; Krüger, <span>2007</span>; Soler, <span>2017a</span>). A recent study by Antonson et al. (<span>2022</span>) claims to have found one of these fascinating adaptations, posing the exciting conclusion that brown-headed cowbird (<i>Molothrus ater</i>) chicks use a niche construction strategy (alteration of its own environment for its own fitness benefit) in prothonotary warbler (<i>Protonotaria citrea</i>) host nests. In this experimental study, the authors have found that the selective brood reduction strategy driven by cowbird nestlings is reducing, but not eliminating host broods. According to their interpretation, this appears to represent an adaptive niche construction strategy given the brood reduction results and that survival of cowbird nestlings is higher in broods of two warbler nestlings than when alone or in broods of four warbler nestlings. This is an intriguing possibility but does a niche construction strategy allowing the survival of two nestmates really exist in brown-headed cowbirds?</p><p>Niche construction is a mechanism whereby individuals actively manipulate their environment to obtain more appropriate conditions in which their possibilities of survival and reproductive success increase (Aaby & Ramsey, <span>2022</span>; Odling-Smee et al., <span>2013</span>; Trappes et al., <span>2022</span>). In birds, nest building is a clear example of niche construction (Trappes et al., <span>2022</span>). The strategy of the common cuckoo (<i>Cuculus canorus</i>) nestling, which soon after hatching evicts all host nestmates from the nest, allowing it to monopolize the feeding effort of its foster parents, can be considered another clear case of niche construction. Other brood parasites (non-evictors) share the nest with host nestlings, but usually, the parasitic nestling(s) outcompetes host nestlings. This also implies an active manipulation of their environment (the nest), and therefore, this strategy could also be considered niche construction. However, Antonson et al. (<span>2022</span>) suggest that in the brown-headed cowbird—protonotary warbler system, the brood parasite selectively manipulates brood reduction favouring the presence of two warbler nestlings in the nest. This suggestion is based on comparisons of data on nestling warbler mortality in four experimental groups, with two parasitized and two unparasitized treatments. However, the crucial prediction of the niche construction hypothesis—that is, that the cowbird nestling causes selective host brood reduction, allowing the survival of just two host nestlings—was not demonstrated.</p><p>In addition, this study selectively cites publications and raises several other key questions. Antonson et al. (<span>2022</span>) base their study on the ‘beggin
由于在共同进化的特殊寄主-寄主系统中发现了许多精细调节的适应,育雏寄生的主题已成为广泛关注的焦点(Davies, 2000;克鲁格,2007;太阳系,2017)。Antonson等人(2022)最近的一项研究声称发现了其中一种令人着迷的适应性,并提出了令人兴奋的结论,即褐头牛鹂(Molothrus ater)雏鸟在原冠莺(Protonotaria citrea)宿主巢穴中使用生态位构建策略(改变自身环境以获得自身健康利益)。在本实验研究中,作者发现,由牛椋鸟雏鸟驱动的选择性减育策略是减少而不是消除宿主窝。根据他们的解释,考虑到雏鸟数量减少的结果,这似乎代表了一种适应性生态位构建策略,而且两只莺巢的雏鸟存活率高于单独或四只莺巢的雏鸟存活率。这是一种有趣的可能性,但是在棕头牛鹂中真的存在一种允许两个同伴生存的生态位构建策略吗?生态位构建是一种机制,通过这种机制,个体主动操纵其环境,以获得更合适的条件,从而增加其生存和繁殖成功的可能性(aby & Ramsey, 2022;Odling-Smee et al., 2013;Trappes et al., 2022)。在鸟类中,筑巢是生态位建设的一个明显例子(Trappes et al., 2022)。普通杜鹃(Cuculus canorus)的筑巢策略,在孵化后不久就把所有的寄主同伴赶出巢,从而垄断了养父母的喂养努力,可以被认为是生态位构建的另一个明显案例。其他幼虫寄生虫(非驱逐者)与寄主雏鸟共享巢穴,但通常情况下,寄主雏鸟比寄主雏鸟竞争更激烈。这也意味着它们对环境(巢穴)的主动操纵,因此,这种策略也可以被认为是生态位构建。然而,Antonson等人(2022)认为,在褐头牛头鸟-原尾莺系统中,幼虫寄生虫选择性地操纵幼虫减少,有利于巢中有两只莺的雏鸟。这一建议是基于四个实验组的雏鸟死亡率数据的比较,两个寄生和两个未寄生处理。然而,生态位构建假说的关键预测——即,牛鹂的雏鸟导致选择性的寄主窝减少,只允许两个寄主窝存活——并没有得到证明。此外,本研究选择性地引用了出版物,并提出了其他几个关键问题。Antonson等人(2022)的研究基于“乞讨协助假说”(Kilner等人,2004),该假说认为,与寄主雏鸟共用巢穴的棕头牛鹂雏鸟比单独饲养的牛鹂雏鸟生长得更快,因为寄生雏鸟利用寄主雏鸟发出的乞讨叫声来获取资源。也就是说,寄主雏鸟的乞讨表现迫使它们的父母增加食物传递的速度,由于其更高的竞争能力,这些额外的食物将被雏鸟消耗掉(Kilner et al., 2004)。为了支持寄生雏鸟需要宿主雏鸟的帮助才能获得足够数量的食物这一假设,作者引用了所有支持这一假设的出版物,包括在该假设提出之前(Lichtenstein & Sealy, 1998)和之后(Gloag et al., 2012;Hoover & Reetz, 2006;Kilner et al., 2004;Li & Hauber, 2021)。其中一篇论文Li和Hauber(2021)明确指出,这一假设仅适用于中型宿主物种。此外,Gloag等人(2012)报告称,乞讨援助假说仅在一个小宿主物种中得到支持,而在一个较大的宿主物种中没有得到支持。不幸的是,Antonson et al.(2022)没有提到任何不支持驱逐幼虫寄生虫乞讨援助假说预测的实验研究(Grim et al., 2009;Hauber & Moskát, 2008;Martín-Gálvez et al., 2005)。Antonson et al.(2022)似乎也没有意识到其他研究(例如Bolopo et al., 2015;Rivers et al., 2010;Soler & de Neve, 2013)和一篇综述(Soler, 2017b)得出的结论是,在几个共用巢穴的寄生虫物种中,较大的雏鸟成功地竞争额外的食物,无论它们是宿主还是寄生虫。Antonson et al.(2022)在他们的论文中没有讨论这一关键因素(即寄生雏鸟相对于宿主雏鸟的大小)是如何影响哪只雏鸟获得额外食物的,因为寄生雏鸟和宿主雏鸟共享的巢穴会产生强烈的乞讨行为。 由于在共同进化的特殊寄主-寄主系统中发现了许多精细调节的适应,育雏寄生的主题已成为广泛关注的焦点(Davies, 2000;克鲁格,2007;太阳系,2017)。Antonson等人(2022)最近的一项研究声称发现了其中一种令人着迷的适应性,并提出了令人兴奋的结论,即褐头牛鹂(Molothrus ater)雏鸟在原冠莺(Protonotaria citrea)宿主巢穴中使用生态位构建策略(改变自身环境以获得自身健康利益)。在本实验研究中,作者发现,由牛椋鸟雏鸟驱动的选择性减育策略是减少而不是消除宿主窝。根据他们的解释,考虑到雏鸟数量减少的结果,这似乎代表了一种适应性生态位构建策略,而且两只莺巢的雏鸟存活率高于单独或四只莺巢的雏鸟存活率。这是一种有趣的可能性,但是在棕头牛鹂中真的存在一种允许两个同伴生存的生态位构建策略吗?生态位构建是个体主动操纵环境以获得更合适的生存条件和繁殖成功率增加的一种机制(aby &拉姆齐,2022;Odling-Smee et al., 2013;Trappes et al., 2022)。在鸟类中,筑巢是生态位建设的一个明显例子(Trappes et al., 2022)。普通杜鹃(Cuculus canorus)的筑巢策略,在孵化后不久就把所有的寄主同伴赶出巢,从而垄断了养父母的喂养努力,可以被认为是生态位构建的另一个明显案例。其他幼虫寄生虫(非驱逐者)与寄主雏鸟共享巢穴,但通常情况下,寄主雏鸟比寄主雏鸟竞争更激烈。这也意味着它们对环境(巢穴)的主动操纵,因此,这种策略也可以被认为是生态位构建。然而,Antonson等人(2022)认为,在褐头牛头鸟-原尾莺系统中,幼虫寄生虫选择性地操纵幼虫减少,有利于巢中有两只莺的雏鸟。这一建议是基于四个实验组的雏鸟死亡率数据的比较,两个寄生和两个未寄生处理。然而,生态位构建假说的关键预测——即,牛鹂的雏鸟导致选择性的寄主窝减少,只允许两个寄主窝存活——并没有得到证明。此外,本研究选择性地引用了出版物,并提出了其他几个关键问题。Antonson等人(2022)的研究基于“乞讨协助假说”(Kilner等人,2004),该假说认为,与寄主雏鸟共用巢穴的棕头牛鹂雏鸟比单独饲养的牛鹂雏鸟生长得更快,因为寄生雏鸟利用寄主雏鸟发出的乞讨叫声来获取资源。也就是说,寄主雏鸟的乞讨表现迫使它们的父母增加食物传递的速度,由于其更高的竞争能力,这些额外的食物将被雏鸟消耗掉(Kilner et al., 2004)。为了支持寄生雏鸟需要宿主雏鸟的帮助来获得足够数量的食物这一假设,作者引用了之前所有支持这一假设的出版物(Lichtenstein &Sealy, 1998)和假说提出后(Gloag et al., 2012;胡佛,Reetz, 2006;Kilner et al., 2004;李,霍伯,2021)。其中一篇论文Li和Hauber(2021)明确指出,这一假设仅适用于中型
{"title":"Does a niche construction strategy adaptation really exist in brown-headed cowbirds?","authors":"Manuel Soler","doi":"10.1111/eth.13412","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eth.13412","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The subject of brood parasitism has become the focus of widespread attention for the numerous finely tuned adaptations that have been discovered in coevolving specialist brood parasite–host systems (Davies, <span>2000</span>; Krüger, <span>2007</span>; Soler, <span>2017a</span>). A recent study by Antonson et al. (<span>2022</span>) claims to have found one of these fascinating adaptations, posing the exciting conclusion that brown-headed cowbird (<i>Molothrus ater</i>) chicks use a niche construction strategy (alteration of its own environment for its own fitness benefit) in prothonotary warbler (<i>Protonotaria citrea</i>) host nests. In this experimental study, the authors have found that the selective brood reduction strategy driven by cowbird nestlings is reducing, but not eliminating host broods. According to their interpretation, this appears to represent an adaptive niche construction strategy given the brood reduction results and that survival of cowbird nestlings is higher in broods of two warbler nestlings than when alone or in broods of four warbler nestlings. This is an intriguing possibility but does a niche construction strategy allowing the survival of two nestmates really exist in brown-headed cowbirds?</p><p>Niche construction is a mechanism whereby individuals actively manipulate their environment to obtain more appropriate conditions in which their possibilities of survival and reproductive success increase (Aaby & Ramsey, <span>2022</span>; Odling-Smee et al., <span>2013</span>; Trappes et al., <span>2022</span>). In birds, nest building is a clear example of niche construction (Trappes et al., <span>2022</span>). The strategy of the common cuckoo (<i>Cuculus canorus</i>) nestling, which soon after hatching evicts all host nestmates from the nest, allowing it to monopolize the feeding effort of its foster parents, can be considered another clear case of niche construction. Other brood parasites (non-evictors) share the nest with host nestlings, but usually, the parasitic nestling(s) outcompetes host nestlings. This also implies an active manipulation of their environment (the nest), and therefore, this strategy could also be considered niche construction. However, Antonson et al. (<span>2022</span>) suggest that in the brown-headed cowbird—protonotary warbler system, the brood parasite selectively manipulates brood reduction favouring the presence of two warbler nestlings in the nest. This suggestion is based on comparisons of data on nestling warbler mortality in four experimental groups, with two parasitized and two unparasitized treatments. However, the crucial prediction of the niche construction hypothesis—that is, that the cowbird nestling causes selective host brood reduction, allowing the survival of just two host nestlings—was not demonstrated.</p><p>In addition, this study selectively cites publications and raises several other key questions. Antonson et al. (<span>2022</span>) base their study on the ‘beggin","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13412","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135695465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Direct reciprocity is the tendency to repay others' cooperation. This tendency can be crucial to maintain cooperation in evolving populations. Once direct reciprocity evolves, individuals have a long-run interest to cooperate, even if it is costly in the short run. The major theoretical framework to describe reciprocal behavior is the repeated prisoner's dilemma. Over the past decades, this game has been the major workhorse to predict when reciprocal cooperation ought to evolve, and which strategies individuals are supposed to adopt. Herein, we compare these predictions with the empirical evidence from experiments with human subjects. From a theory-driven perspective, humans represent an ideal test case, because they give researchers the most flexibility to tailor the experimental design to the assumptions of a model. Overall, we find that theoretical models describe well in which situations people cooperate. However, in the important case of “indefinitely repeated games,” they have difficulties to predict which strategies people use.
{"title":"Direct reciprocity among humans","authors":"Charlotte S. L. Rossetti, Christian Hilbe","doi":"10.1111/eth.13407","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eth.13407","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Direct reciprocity is the tendency to repay others' cooperation. This tendency can be crucial to maintain cooperation in evolving populations. Once direct reciprocity evolves, individuals have a long-run interest to cooperate, even if it is costly in the short run. The major theoretical framework to describe reciprocal behavior is the repeated prisoner's dilemma. Over the past decades, this game has been the major workhorse to predict when reciprocal cooperation ought to evolve, and which strategies individuals are supposed to adopt. Herein, we compare these predictions with the empirical evidence from experiments with human subjects. From a theory-driven perspective, humans represent an ideal test case, because they give researchers the most flexibility to tailor the experimental design to the assumptions of a model. Overall, we find that theoretical models describe well in which situations people cooperate. However, in the important case of “indefinitely repeated games,” they have difficulties to predict which strategies people use.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"130 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13407","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136341607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}