首页 > 最新文献

Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory最新文献

英文 中文
Organizational Routines as a Source of Ethical Blindness 组织惯例是伦理盲目性的来源
IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q1 Mathematics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/26317877221075640
Barbara Kump, Markus Scholz
Organizational research has shown that decision-makers can be subject to ethical blindness, a temporary inability to see the ethical dimension of a situation at hand. Previous theoretical approaches have identified organizational routines—recurring multi-actor practices—as important indirect context factors of ethical blindness. The present article argues that earlier theorizing is incomplete. Organizational routines may be a much more direct cause of ethical blindness and they may play a much stronger role in fostering unintentional unethical behavior than is currently acknowledged. As its main contribution, the article synthesizes research on unethical organizational behavior with findings on the micro-foundations of organizational routines to systematically theorize about when and how routines can directly cause ethical blindness. Given that organizational routines are not only a main pillar of organizational research but an indispensable part of organizational life, an increased understanding of their role in creating ethical blindness is of high theoretical and practical relevance. In particular, a routine-based explanation of ethical blindness may help in identifying and counteracting “everyday” unethical practices that are prevalent in modern business organizations.
组织研究表明,决策者可能会受到道德盲目性的影响,即暂时无法看到手头情况的道德层面。以前的理论方法已经确定了组织惯例-反复出现的多参与者实践-作为伦理盲目性的重要间接背景因素。本文认为,早期的理论是不完整的。组织惯例可能是道德盲目性的一个更直接的原因,它们可能在培养无意的不道德行为方面发挥比目前公认的更大的作用。本文的主要贡献在于,将非伦理组织行为的研究与组织惯例的微观基础研究相结合,系统地理论化了惯例何时以及如何直接导致伦理盲目性。鉴于组织惯例不仅是组织研究的主要支柱,而且是组织生活中不可或缺的一部分,因此增加对其在造成伦理盲目性中的作用的理解具有很高的理论和实践意义。特别是,对道德盲目性的常规解释可能有助于识别和抵制现代商业组织中普遍存在的“日常”不道德行为。
{"title":"Organizational Routines as a Source of Ethical Blindness","authors":"Barbara Kump, Markus Scholz","doi":"10.1177/26317877221075640","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221075640","url":null,"abstract":"Organizational research has shown that decision-makers can be subject to ethical blindness, a temporary inability to see the ethical dimension of a situation at hand. Previous theoretical approaches have identified organizational routines—recurring multi-actor practices—as important indirect context factors of ethical blindness. The present article argues that earlier theorizing is incomplete. Organizational routines may be a much more direct cause of ethical blindness and they may play a much stronger role in fostering unintentional unethical behavior than is currently acknowledged. As its main contribution, the article synthesizes research on unethical organizational behavior with findings on the micro-foundations of organizational routines to systematically theorize about when and how routines can directly cause ethical blindness. Given that organizational routines are not only a main pillar of organizational research but an indispensable part of organizational life, an increased understanding of their role in creating ethical blindness is of high theoretical and practical relevance. In particular, a routine-based explanation of ethical blindness may help in identifying and counteracting “everyday” unethical practices that are prevalent in modern business organizations.","PeriodicalId":50648,"journal":{"name":"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79542915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Food supply network disruption and mitigation: an integrated perspective of traceability technology and network structure. 食品供应网络的中断与缓解:溯源技术与网络结构的综合视角。
IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10588-022-09366-z
Lili Wang, Bin Hu, Yihang Feng, Yanting Duan, Wuyi Zhang

The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic has caused serious disruptions in food supply networks. Based on the case of the remerging epidemic in China, this paper aims to investigate food supply network disruption and its mitigation from technical and structural perspectives. To solve the optimal policy choice problem that how to improve mitigation capability of food supply networks by using traceability technology and adjusting network structure, the occurrence mechanism of food supply network disruptions is revealed through a case study of the remerging COVID-19 outbreak in Beijing's Xinfadi market. Five typical traceability solutions are proposed to mitigate network disruptions and their technical attributes are analyzed to establish disruption mitigation models. The structure of food supply networks is also controlled to mitigate disruptions. The structural attributes of three fundamental networks are extracted to adjust the network connections pattern in disruption mitigation models. Next, simulation experiments involving the disruption mitigation models are carried out to explore the independent and joint effects of traceability technology and network structure on mitigation capability. The findings suggest that accuracy makes a more positive effect on the mitigation capability of food supply networks than timeliness due to the various technical compositions behind them; the difference between these effects determines the choice decision of supply networks on traceability solution types. Likewise, betweenness centralization makes a positive effect but degree centralization makes a negative effect on mitigation capability because intermediary firms and focal firms in food supply networks have different behavior characteristics; these effects are both regulated by supply network types and exhibit different sensitivities. As for the joint effect of technical and structural attributes on mitigation capability, the joint effect of accuracy and betweenness centralization is bigger than the independent effects but smaller than their sum; the joint effect of timeliness and betweenness centralization depends on networks type; while the positive effect of accuracy or timeliness on mitigation capability is greater than the negative effect of degree centralization; theses joint effects are caused by the complicated interactive effects between technical composition and behaviors of intermediary firms or focal firms. These findings contribute to disruption management and decision-making theories and practices.

2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情对食品供应网络造成了严重破坏。本文以中国再次发生的疫情为案例,从技术和结构的角度研究食品供应网络中断及其缓解问题。为了解决如何利用溯源技术和调整网络结构提高食品供应网络缓解能力的最优政策选择问题,本文通过对北京新发地市场再次爆发 COVID-19 疫情的案例研究,揭示了食品供应网络中断的发生机制。提出了缓解网络中断的五种典型溯源解决方案,并分析了其技术属性,建立了中断缓解模型。此外,还对食品供应网络的结构进行了控制,以缓解网络中断。提取了三个基本网络的结构属性,以调整中断缓解模型中的网络连接模式。接着,对中断缓解模型进行了模拟实验,以探索可追溯技术和网络结构对缓解能力的独立和联合影响。研究结果表明,由于食品供应网络背后的各种技术构成,准确性比及时性对食品供应网络的缓解能力产生更积极的影响;这两种影响之间的差异决定了供应网络对可追溯解决方案类型的选择决策。同样,由于食品供应网络中的中间企业和焦点企业具有不同的行为特征,因此间度集中化对缓解能力具有正向影响,而程度集中化对缓解能力具有负向影响;这些影响都受到供应网络类型的调节,并表现出不同的敏感性。在技术属性和结构属性对减缓能力的联合效应方面,准确性和间度集中化的联合效应大于独立效应,但小于两者之和;及时性和间度集中化的联合效应取决于网络类型;而准确性或及时性对减缓能力的正效应大于程度集中化的负效应;这些联合效应是由技术构成与中间企业或焦点企业行为之间复杂的交互效应引起的。这些发现有助于干扰管理和决策理论与实践。
{"title":"Food supply network disruption and mitigation: an integrated perspective of traceability technology and network structure.","authors":"Lili Wang, Bin Hu, Yihang Feng, Yanting Duan, Wuyi Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10588-022-09366-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10588-022-09366-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic has caused serious disruptions in food supply networks. Based on the case of the remerging epidemic in China, this paper aims to investigate food supply network disruption and its mitigation from technical and structural perspectives. To solve the optimal policy choice problem that how to improve mitigation capability of food supply networks by using traceability technology and adjusting network structure, the occurrence mechanism of food supply network disruptions is revealed through a case study of the remerging COVID-19 outbreak in Beijing's Xinfadi market. Five typical traceability solutions are proposed to mitigate network disruptions and their technical attributes are analyzed to establish disruption mitigation models. The structure of food supply networks is also controlled to mitigate disruptions. The structural attributes of three fundamental networks are extracted to adjust the network connections pattern in disruption mitigation models. Next, simulation experiments involving the disruption mitigation models are carried out to explore the independent and joint effects of traceability technology and network structure on mitigation capability. The findings suggest that accuracy makes a more positive effect on the mitigation capability of food supply networks than timeliness due to the various technical compositions behind them; the difference between these effects determines the choice decision of supply networks on traceability solution types. Likewise, betweenness centralization makes a positive effect but degree centralization makes a negative effect on mitigation capability because intermediary firms and focal firms in food supply networks have different behavior characteristics; these effects are both regulated by supply network types and exhibit different sensitivities. As for the joint effect of technical and structural attributes on mitigation capability, the joint effect of accuracy and betweenness centralization is bigger than the independent effects but smaller than their sum; the joint effect of timeliness and betweenness centralization depends on networks type; while the positive effect of accuracy or timeliness on mitigation capability is greater than the negative effect of degree centralization; theses joint effects are caused by the complicated interactive effects between technical composition and behaviors of intermediary firms or focal firms. These findings contribute to disruption management and decision-making theories and practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":50648,"journal":{"name":"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9525948/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10440187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Making futures that matter: Future making, online working and organizing remotely 创造有意义的未来:创造未来、在线工作和远程组织
IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q1 Mathematics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/26317877211069138
J. Whyte, Alice Comi, Luigi Mosca
Future making is the work of making sense of possible and probable futures, and evaluating, negotiating and giving form to preferred ones. Practices of making futures are increasingly online. Yet, as organizational participants come together online – organizing remotely to make offline futures – they lack the shared experiential knowledge that is gained through embodied and situated practices. In this essay, we argue that the lack of experiential knowledge makes future making online difficult to organize and vulnerable to excluding relevant expertise; dialogue may become inward-looking and self-referential within the online environment, with an emotional and cognitive distance from the futures being made outside of such representations. We draw on the pragmatist tradition to theorize online future making, to articulate its dynamics and the challenges that arise, and to suggest remedial actions. By conceptualizing future making as a form of inquiry – as a distributed and reflective process that proceeds through engagement with representations of the future – we identify three remedial actions for online future making: to solicit feedback, juxtapose alternatives and change medium. These remedial actions seek to compensate for the lack of shared experiential knowledge by both sustaining the online involvement of heterogeneous remote participants and by bringing in relevant (offline) places, people and materials to online future making.
未来规划是对可能的和可能的未来进行理解,并评估、协商和形成首选未来的工作。期货交易越来越多地在网上进行。然而,当组织参与者在网上聚集在一起——远程组织以创造线下的未来——他们缺乏通过具体化和情境实践获得的共享经验知识。在本文中,我们认为经验知识的缺乏使未来在线制作难以组织,容易排除相关专业知识;在网络环境中,对话可能会变得内向和自我参照,在情感和认知上与这种表现之外的未来保持距离。我们借鉴实用主义的传统,理论化在线未来的制定,阐明其动态和出现的挑战,并建议补救措施。通过将未来制作概念化为一种探究形式——作为一种通过参与未来的表征而进行的分布式和反思过程——我们确定了在线未来制作的三种补救措施:征求反馈、并列选择和改变媒介。这些补救行动试图通过维持异构远程参与者的在线参与以及通过将相关(离线)地点、人员和材料引入在线未来制定来弥补共享经验知识的缺乏。
{"title":"Making futures that matter: Future making, online working and organizing remotely","authors":"J. Whyte, Alice Comi, Luigi Mosca","doi":"10.1177/26317877211069138","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211069138","url":null,"abstract":"Future making is the work of making sense of possible and probable futures, and evaluating, negotiating and giving form to preferred ones. Practices of making futures are increasingly online. Yet, as organizational participants come together online – organizing remotely to make offline futures – they lack the shared experiential knowledge that is gained through embodied and situated practices. In this essay, we argue that the lack of experiential knowledge makes future making online difficult to organize and vulnerable to excluding relevant expertise; dialogue may become inward-looking and self-referential within the online environment, with an emotional and cognitive distance from the futures being made outside of such representations. We draw on the pragmatist tradition to theorize online future making, to articulate its dynamics and the challenges that arise, and to suggest remedial actions. By conceptualizing future making as a form of inquiry – as a distributed and reflective process that proceeds through engagement with representations of the future – we identify three remedial actions for online future making: to solicit feedback, juxtapose alternatives and change medium. These remedial actions seek to compensate for the lack of shared experiential knowledge by both sustaining the online involvement of heterogeneous remote participants and by bringing in relevant (offline) places, people and materials to online future making.","PeriodicalId":50648,"journal":{"name":"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75896044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Optimal Distinctiveness: On Being the Same and Different 最优独特性:论相同与不同
IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q1 Mathematics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/26317877221079340
Eric Zhao, Maryann Glynn
Optimal distinctiveness is a theory that emphasizes actors’ drive to be both “the same and different at the same time” (Brewer, 1991, p. 475). Originating as an approach to explain individuals’ self-construals, the theory has expanded over time to embrace the organizational level and beyond, becoming a major area of research where organization theorists and strategy scholars can converse. In this paper, we briefly review the historical and contemporaneous approaches to optimal distinctiveness and note an increasing trend of contextualizing optimal distinctiveness. While encouraging, this trend has fallen short of accounting for four important contingencies that significantly shape optimal distinctiveness and its underpinning mechanisms: organizational hybridity, societal culture, temporal contingencies, and benchmarks for gauging optimal distinctiveness. We discuss these four contingencies and propose corresponding conversation starters to guide future research. These conversation starters have the potential of further enhancing our understanding of optimal distinctiveness, broadening optimal distinctiveness scholarship into new domains, and helping inform and resolve challenges organizations face in pursuing optimal distinctiveness.
最优独特性是一种强调行为者“同时保持相同和不同”的动力的理论(Brewer, 1991, p. 475)。这一理论最初是作为一种解释个人自我意识的方法,随着时间的推移,它已经扩展到组织层面甚至更远的地方,成为组织理论家和战略学者可以交流的一个主要研究领域。在本文中,我们简要回顾了历史上和当代研究最优独特性的方法,并指出了将最优独特性语境化的趋势。虽然令人鼓舞,但这一趋势没有考虑到四个重要的偶然性,这些偶然性显著地塑造了最优独特性及其基础机制:组织杂交性、社会文化、时间偶然性和衡量最优独特性的基准。我们对这四种偶然事件进行了讨论,并提出了相应的会话启动方式,以指导今后的研究。这些对话的启动者有可能进一步增强我们对最佳独特性的理解,将最佳独特性研究扩展到新的领域,并帮助告知和解决组织在追求最佳独特性时面临的挑战。
{"title":"Optimal Distinctiveness: On Being the Same and Different","authors":"Eric Zhao, Maryann Glynn","doi":"10.1177/26317877221079340","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221079340","url":null,"abstract":"Optimal distinctiveness is a theory that emphasizes actors’ drive to be both “the same and different at the same time” (Brewer, 1991, p. 475). Originating as an approach to explain individuals’ self-construals, the theory has expanded over time to embrace the organizational level and beyond, becoming a major area of research where organization theorists and strategy scholars can converse. In this paper, we briefly review the historical and contemporaneous approaches to optimal distinctiveness and note an increasing trend of contextualizing optimal distinctiveness. While encouraging, this trend has fallen short of accounting for four important contingencies that significantly shape optimal distinctiveness and its underpinning mechanisms: organizational hybridity, societal culture, temporal contingencies, and benchmarks for gauging optimal distinctiveness. We discuss these four contingencies and propose corresponding conversation starters to guide future research. These conversation starters have the potential of further enhancing our understanding of optimal distinctiveness, broadening optimal distinctiveness scholarship into new domains, and helping inform and resolve challenges organizations face in pursuing optimal distinctiveness.","PeriodicalId":50648,"journal":{"name":"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88395982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Groups, governance, and greed: the ACCESS world model 团体、治理和贪婪:ACCESS世界模式
IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q1 Mathematics Pub Date : 2021-12-02 DOI: 10.1007/s10588-021-09352-x
Scott Rager, A. Leung, Shannon Pinegar, Jennifer Mangels, M. S. Poole, N. Contractor
{"title":"Groups, governance, and greed: the ACCESS world model","authors":"Scott Rager, A. Leung, Shannon Pinegar, Jennifer Mangels, M. S. Poole, N. Contractor","doi":"10.1007/s10588-021-09352-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-021-09352-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50648,"journal":{"name":"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47148330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Decision making under high complexity: a computational model for the science of muddling through 高复杂性下的决策:混过科学的计算模型
IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q1 Mathematics Pub Date : 2021-11-28 DOI: 10.1007/s10588-021-09354-9
Sai Yayavaram, S. S. Chanda
{"title":"Decision making under high complexity: a computational model for the science of muddling through","authors":"Sai Yayavaram, S. S. Chanda","doi":"10.1007/s10588-021-09354-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-021-09354-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50648,"journal":{"name":"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41538723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Explaining and predicting human behavior and social dynamics in simulated virtual worlds: reproducibility, generalizability, and robustness of causal discovery methods 解释和预测模拟虚拟世界中的人类行为和社会动态:因果发现方法的可再现性、可推广性和稳健性
IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q1 Mathematics Pub Date : 2021-11-18 DOI: 10.1007/s10588-021-09351-y
Svitlana Volkova, Dustin L. Arendt, Emily Saldanha, M. Glenski, Ellyn Ayton, Joseph A. Cottam, Sinan G. Aksoy, Brett Jefferson, Karthnik Shrivaram
{"title":"Explaining and predicting human behavior and social dynamics in simulated virtual worlds: reproducibility, generalizability, and robustness of causal discovery methods","authors":"Svitlana Volkova, Dustin L. Arendt, Emily Saldanha, M. Glenski, Ellyn Ayton, Joseph A. Cottam, Sinan G. Aksoy, Brett Jefferson, Karthnik Shrivaram","doi":"10.1007/s10588-021-09351-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-021-09351-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50648,"journal":{"name":"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47888125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A multi-value cellular automata model for multi-lane traffic flow under lagrange coordinate 拉格朗日坐标下多车道交通流的多值元胞自动机模型
IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q1 Mathematics Pub Date : 2021-10-19 DOI: 10.1007/s10588-021-09345-w
Junwei Zeng, Yongsheng Qian, Fan Yin, Leipeng Zhu, Dejie Xu
{"title":"A multi-value cellular automata model for multi-lane traffic flow under lagrange coordinate","authors":"Junwei Zeng, Yongsheng Qian, Fan Yin, Leipeng Zhu, Dejie Xu","doi":"10.1007/s10588-021-09345-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-021-09345-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50648,"journal":{"name":"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"52217403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24
Organizations, Social Problems, and System Change: Invigorating the Third Mandate of Organizational Research 组织、社会问题与制度变迁:充实组织研究的第三使命
IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q1 Mathematics Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1177/26317877211054858
J. Mair, C. Seelos
Organizations across sectors appear to be shifting their ambitions from solving social problems to changing entire social systems. This phenomenon offers a timely opportunity to revisit what came to be known as the third mandate of organizational theory. In this paper we interrogate how organizational scholarship can productively explore and theorize the relationship between organizations and social systems in organized system change – an effort by organizations to alter the conditions that generate the characteristics of social problems and their dynamics of change. As a basis for theorizing organized system change, we develop an analytical scaffold that helps researchers to attend to fundamental aspects of the phenomenon and to achieve parsimony without blanking out complexity. Grounded in realist metatheory and principles, the scaffold reduces ambiguity, provides a backbone for empirical analysis, and favours mechanism-based explanation. We suggest that generating theoretically interesting and practically adequate knowledge on organized system change requires attention to three system realms: First, the subjectively constructed problem realm of systems concerned with processes of evaluating and problematizing situations. Second, the objectively constituted situational realm that attends to factual characteristics of situations and their dynamics of change. And third, the realm of causality understood as the mechanisms that generate both the objective characteristics of situations and the subjective criteria by which situations are evaluated as problems. In concluding, we reflect on the topics of boundaries and power as two promising areas for theorizing organized system change.
各行各业的组织似乎正在把他们的目标从解决社会问题转向改变整个社会体系。这种现象提供了一个及时的机会来重新审视后来被称为组织理论的第三项任务。在本文中,我们探讨了组织学术如何在有组织的系统变革中有效地探索和理论化组织与社会系统之间的关系。有组织的系统变革是组织改变产生社会问题特征及其变化动态的条件的努力。作为理论化有组织系统变化的基础,我们开发了一个分析脚手架,帮助研究人员关注现象的基本方面,并在不忽略复杂性的情况下实现简约。在现实主义元理论和原则的基础上,脚手架减少了模糊性,为实证分析提供了支柱,并有利于基于机制的解释。我们建议,要产生关于有组织的系统变化的理论有趣和实际足够的知识,需要注意三个系统领域:第一,主观构建的系统问题领域,涉及评估和问题化情况的过程。第二,客观构成的情境领域,关注情境的事实特征及其变化的动态。第三,因果关系领域被理解为产生情境的客观特征和主观标准的机制,这些标准是评估情境作为问题的依据。最后,我们反思了边界和权力作为理论化有组织的系统变化的两个有前途的领域。
{"title":"Organizations, Social Problems, and System Change: Invigorating the Third Mandate of Organizational Research","authors":"J. Mair, C. Seelos","doi":"10.1177/26317877211054858","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211054858","url":null,"abstract":"Organizations across sectors appear to be shifting their ambitions from solving social problems to changing entire social systems. This phenomenon offers a timely opportunity to revisit what came to be known as the third mandate of organizational theory. In this paper we interrogate how organizational scholarship can productively explore and theorize the relationship between organizations and social systems in organized system change – an effort by organizations to alter the conditions that generate the characteristics of social problems and their dynamics of change. As a basis for theorizing organized system change, we develop an analytical scaffold that helps researchers to attend to fundamental aspects of the phenomenon and to achieve parsimony without blanking out complexity. Grounded in realist metatheory and principles, the scaffold reduces ambiguity, provides a backbone for empirical analysis, and favours mechanism-based explanation. We suggest that generating theoretically interesting and practically adequate knowledge on organized system change requires attention to three system realms: First, the subjectively constructed problem realm of systems concerned with processes of evaluating and problematizing situations. Second, the objectively constituted situational realm that attends to factual characteristics of situations and their dynamics of change. And third, the realm of causality understood as the mechanisms that generate both the objective characteristics of situations and the subjective criteria by which situations are evaluated as problems. In concluding, we reflect on the topics of boundaries and power as two promising areas for theorizing organized system change.","PeriodicalId":50648,"journal":{"name":"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78362261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
‘Open Purpose’: Embracing Organizations as Expressive Systems “开放目的”:将组织视为表达系统
IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q1 Mathematics Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1177/26317877211054860
S. Clegg, M. Cunha, A. Rego, Filipe Santos
The concept of purpose gained prominence in organization theory in recent years but there are discrepant views of its meaning, which we review as evolving and different perspectives: economic theories of the firm; stakeholder approaches; integrative social contracts; and social mission. We elaborate these perspectives in terms of the ebb and flow of ideas and eras. Against these instrumental views, we revisit the work of Robert Cooper, namely the ever-open purpose of expressive organizations, and contrast this with fixist views of purpose in instrumental organizations. We engage with the logic of open purpose and sketch a way of rethinking purpose as a general orientation that constantly evolves and changes over time in interaction with its ecosystem.
近年来,目的的概念在组织理论中得到了突出的地位,但对其含义的看法存在分歧,我们将其视为不断发展的不同观点:企业经济理论;利益相关者的方法;综合社会契约;还有社会使命。我们从思想和时代的潮起潮落的角度来阐述这些观点。针对这些工具性观点,我们重新审视罗伯特·库珀(Robert Cooper)的工作,即表达型组织的永远开放的目的,并将其与工具性组织的固定主义目的观点进行对比。我们参与了开放目的的逻辑,并勾勒出一种重新思考目的的方式,将其作为一种总体方向,随着时间的推移,在与生态系统的互动中不断发展和变化。
{"title":"‘Open Purpose’: Embracing Organizations as Expressive Systems","authors":"S. Clegg, M. Cunha, A. Rego, Filipe Santos","doi":"10.1177/26317877211054860","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211054860","url":null,"abstract":"The concept of purpose gained prominence in organization theory in recent years but there are discrepant views of its meaning, which we review as evolving and different perspectives: economic theories of the firm; stakeholder approaches; integrative social contracts; and social mission. We elaborate these perspectives in terms of the ebb and flow of ideas and eras. Against these instrumental views, we revisit the work of Robert Cooper, namely the ever-open purpose of expressive organizations, and contrast this with fixist views of purpose in instrumental organizations. We engage with the logic of open purpose and sketch a way of rethinking purpose as a general orientation that constantly evolves and changes over time in interaction with its ecosystem.","PeriodicalId":50648,"journal":{"name":"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85475263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
期刊
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1