Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology最新文献

Background: Executive dysfunction, which is common among persons with HIV (PWH), can have an adverse impact on health behaviors and quality of life. Intra-individual variability (IIV) is a measure of within-person variability across cognitive tests that is higher in PWH and is thought to reflect cognitive dyscontrol.

Objective: To assess whether cognitive IIV in the laboratory is associated with self-reported executive dysfunction in daily life among older PWH.

Method: Participants included 71 PWH aged ≥50 years who completed six subtests from the Cogstate battery and two subscales from the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe; self-report version). Cognitive IIV was calculated from the Cogstate as the coefficient of variation derived from age-adjusted normative T scores.

Results: Cognitive IIV as measured by the Cogstate showed a significant, positive, medium-sized association with current FrSBe ratings of executive dysfunction but not disinhibition.

Conclusion: Higher cognitive IIV in the laboratory as measured by the Cogstate may be related to the expression of HIV-associated symptoms of executive dysfunction in daily life for older PWH.

Background: The predictive ability of the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) for postoperative cognitive improvement in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is unstudied.

Objective: To compare the predictive ability of the FAB and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for postoperative cognitive improvement in individuals with iNPH after shunt surgery.

Method: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of individuals with iNPH who had shunt surgery between January 2016 and October 2018. Individuals had completed the tap test and clinical evaluations (FAB, MMSE, Timed Up and Go [TUG]) both before and 24-48 hours after CSF tapping and after surgery. We excluded individuals without complete clinical evaluations and those with shunt surgery performed >6 months after CSF tapping. Factors associated with postoperative FAB and MMSE improvement as per the 2011 iNPH guidelines were extracted using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Independent variables were baseline FAB and MMSE scores, FAB and MMSE score changes and TUG amelioration rate after CSF tapping, Evans index, age, and days from CSF tapping to surgery and from surgery to postoperative assessment.

Results: The mean number of days from CSF tapping to surgery and from surgery to postoperative assessment were 77.5 (SD = 36.0) and 42.0 (SD = 14.5), respectively. Logistic regression analyses showed significant associations in the univariate analyses of postoperative FAB improvement with baseline FAB scores ( P = 0.043) and with FAB score changes after CSF tapping ( P = 0.047).

Conclusion: The FAB may help predict postoperative cognitive improvement after shunt surgery better than the MMSE.

Background: Facial emotion recognition (FER) is commonly impaired in individuals with neurodegenerative disease (NDD). This impairment has been linked to an increase in behavioral disorders and caregiver burden.

Objective: To identify interventions targeting the improvement of FER ability in individuals with NDD and investigate the magnitude of the efficacy of the interventions. We also wanted to explore the duration of the effects of the intervention and their possible impacts on behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia and caregiver burden.

Method: We included 15 studies with 604 individuals who had been diagnosed with NDD. The identified interventions were categorized into three types of approach (cognitive, neurostimulation, and pharmacological) as well as a combined approach (neurostimulation with pharmacological).

Results: The three types of approaches pooled together had a significant large effect size for FER ability improvement (standard mean difference: 1.21, 95% CI = 0.11, 2.31, z = 2.15, P = 0.03). The improvement lasted post intervention, in tandem with a decrease in behavioral disorders and caregiver burden.

Conclusion: A combination of different approaches for FER ability improvement may be beneficial for individuals with NDD and their caregivers.

Background: Changes to speech and language are common symptoms across different subtypes of frontotemporal dementia (FTD). These changes affect the ability to communicate, impacting everyday functions. Accurately assessing these changes may help clinicians to track disease progression and detect response to treatment.

Objective: To determine which aspects of speech show significant change over time and to develop a novel composite score for tracking speech and language decline in individuals with FTD.

Method: We recruited individuals with FTD to complete remote digital speech assessments based on a picture description task. Speech samples were analyzed to derive acoustic and linguistic measures of speech and language, which were tested for longitudinal change over the course of the study and were used to compute a novel composite score.

Results: Thirty-six (16 F, 20 M; M age = 61.3 years) individuals were enrolled in the study, with 27 completing a follow-up assessment 12 months later. We identified eight variables reflecting different aspects of language that showed longitudinal decline in the FTD clinical syndrome subtypes and developed a novel composite score based on these variables. The resulting composite score demonstrated a significant effect of change over time, high test-retest reliability, and a correlation with standard scores on various other speech tasks.

Conclusion: Remote digital speech assessments have the potential to characterize speech and language abilities in individuals with FTD, reducing the burden of clinical assessments while providing a novel measure of speech and language abilities that is sensitive to disease and relevant to everyday function.

Individuals with childhood apraxia of speech often exhibit greater difficulty with expressive language than with receptive language. As a result, they may benefit from alternative modes of communication. Here, we present a patient with childhood apraxia of speech who used pointing as a means of communication at age 2 ¼ years and self-made gestures at age 3½, when he had severe difficulties speaking in spite of probable normal comprehension abilities. His original gestures included not only word-level expressions, but also sentence-length ones. For example, when expressing "I am going to bed," he pointed his index finger at himself (meaning I ) and then put both his hands together near his ear ( sleep ). When trying to convey the meaning of "I enjoyed the meal and am leaving," he covered his mouth with his right hand ( delicious ), then joined both of his hands in front of himself ( finish ) and finally waved his hands ( goodbye ). These original gestures and pointing peaked at the age of 4 and then subsided and completely disappeared by the age of 7, when he was able to make himself understood to some extent with spoken words. The present case demonstrates an adaptive strategy for communication that might be an inherent competence for human beings.

Dividing the brain-mind into the specialized fields of neurology and psychiatry has produced many granular advantages, but these silos have imposed barriers to comprehensively understanding and contextualizing the fundamentals governing mental life and its maladies. Scientific inquiry into these fundamentals cannot reach its full potential without interdigitating the boundaries of two specialties of the same organ for both scholarship and clinical practice. We propose that to truly integrate disorders of the brain and the mind for research and clinical care, we must carefully reexamine the classification of its disorders (nosology) as an instrument to develop a coherent pathological and psychological framework. We call on professional organizations from neurology, psychiatry, behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and other relevant subspecialties (eg, geriatric psychiatry) to convene a multidisciplinary task force to define the current classification principles of their subspecialties and work toward developing an integrated nosology. The effect of a shared classification system, which we acknowledge is a difficult proposition philosophically and politically, would have transformative potential across educational, clinical, scientific, programmatic, and sociocultural realms. If accomplished, this initiative would provide a definitive step toward reducing stigma (and promoting reimbursement parity) for the full spectrum of complex brain disorders (regardless of traditional neurologic vs psychiatric conceptualizations).