Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-08-15DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03651-w
César Gutiérrez Pérez, Enrique Lastra Aras, Patricia Saiz López, Enrique García Toro, Carmen Blanco Abad, Inmaculada Rodríguez Ledesma, María Pumares González, Miriam Vela Domínguez, Noelia Espinosa Cabria, Guillermo Crespo Herrero
Purpose: To describe the molecular profile of a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and to evaluate the benefit of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels in guiding therapy in patients with mUC and the outcomes of DNA-matched treatments recommended by a multidisciplinary molecular tumor board (MMTB).
Methods: This was a single-center analysis of a real-world cohort of adult patients with mUC included in an ongoing trial that aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of NGS for solid tumors. Genomic analysis was performed for each patient, most of them using the Ion Torrent Oncomine Focus Assay. Genomic results were discussed during MMTB meetings.
Results: We included 43 patients with mUC treated with platinum-based combinations and immunotherapy. Twenty-five patients (58.1%; 95% CI 43.4-72.9) had at least one tumor pathogenic alteration. The MMTB classified 16 (48.5%) of the 33 tumor pathogenic alterations found in our real-world cohort of mUC patients as ESCAT I, which is the maximum grade of actionability. After excluding patients who were not candidates for targeted therapies, the MMTB provided guidance on matched therapy for seven patients. Among these patients, three achieved a partial response for an overall response rate of 42.9%, a median progression-free survival of 7.3 months (95% CI 6.7-7.9) and a median overall survival of 10.9 months (95% CI 2.4-19.5).
Conclusions: We recommend that all patients with mUC undergo NGS at diagnosis given the high percentage of patients with pathogenic alterations in our real-world cohort and the efficacy data of patients treated with targeted therapies.
目的:描述现实世界中转移性尿路上皮癌(mUC)患者队列的分子特征,评估下一代测序(NGS)面板在指导mUC患者治疗中的益处,以及多学科分子肿瘤委员会(MMTB)推荐的DNA匹配治疗的结果:这是对一项正在进行的试验中纳入的 mUC 成年患者真实世界队列的单中心分析,该试验旨在评估 NGS 对实体瘤的临床效用。对每位患者进行了基因组分析,其中大部分患者使用的是 Ion Torrent Oncomine Focus Assay。在 MMTB 会议上讨论了基因组结果:我们纳入了 43 名接受铂类联合疗法和免疫疗法治疗的 mUC 患者。25例患者(58.1%;95% CI 43.4-72.9)至少有一种肿瘤致病性改变。MMTB将在我们的mUC患者真实世界队列中发现的33种肿瘤致病性改变中的16种(48.5%)归类为ESCAT I,这是可操作性的最高等级。在排除了不适合接受靶向治疗的患者后,MMTB 为 7 名患者提供了匹配治疗指导。在这些患者中,有三人获得了部分应答,总应答率为42.9%,中位无进展生存期为7.3个月(95% CI 6.7-7.9),中位总生存期为10.9个月(95% CI 2.4-19.5):我们建议所有 mUC 患者在确诊时接受 NGS 检查,因为在我们的实际队列中,有高比例的患者存在致病性改变,而且接受靶向疗法治疗的患者的疗效数据也很好。
{"title":"Single-center analysis of a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma evaluated by NGS: molecular landscape and efficacy of targeted therapies.","authors":"César Gutiérrez Pérez, Enrique Lastra Aras, Patricia Saiz López, Enrique García Toro, Carmen Blanco Abad, Inmaculada Rodríguez Ledesma, María Pumares González, Miriam Vela Domínguez, Noelia Espinosa Cabria, Guillermo Crespo Herrero","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03651-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-024-03651-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the molecular profile of a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and to evaluate the benefit of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels in guiding therapy in patients with mUC and the outcomes of DNA-matched treatments recommended by a multidisciplinary molecular tumor board (MMTB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center analysis of a real-world cohort of adult patients with mUC included in an ongoing trial that aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of NGS for solid tumors. Genomic analysis was performed for each patient, most of them using the Ion Torrent Oncomine Focus Assay. Genomic results were discussed during MMTB meetings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 43 patients with mUC treated with platinum-based combinations and immunotherapy. Twenty-five patients (58.1%; 95% CI 43.4-72.9) had at least one tumor pathogenic alteration. The MMTB classified 16 (48.5%) of the 33 tumor pathogenic alterations found in our real-world cohort of mUC patients as ESCAT I, which is the maximum grade of actionability. After excluding patients who were not candidates for targeted therapies, the MMTB provided guidance on matched therapy for seven patients. Among these patients, three achieved a partial response for an overall response rate of 42.9%, a median progression-free survival of 7.3 months (95% CI 6.7-7.9) and a median overall survival of 10.9 months (95% CI 2.4-19.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We recommend that all patients with mUC undergo NGS at diagnosis given the high percentage of patients with pathogenic alterations in our real-world cohort and the efficacy data of patients treated with targeted therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1211-1220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141989439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The association between serum folate concentrations and the mortality of cancer remains unclear. We aim to investigate the association of serum folate concentrations with all-cause and cause-specific mortality among American adults with cancer.
Methods: This cohort study included 4535 patients with cancer from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999 to 2016 and NHANES III (1988-1994). Death outcomes were ascertained by linkage to National Death Index records through 31 December 2019. Cox proportional hazards model and two-piecewise Cox proportional hazards model were used to calculate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the associations between folate concentrations and the risk of mortality.
Results: During a median follow-up of 37,792 person-years, there were 1998 all-cause deaths and 616 cancer deaths. Non-linear and L-shaped associations were observed between serum folate concentrations and the risk of all-cause and cancer mortality among patients with cancer. Notably, the mortality rates reached a plateau at 23.7 ng/mL for all-cause mortality and 23.57 ng/mL for cancer mortality. When folate levels fell below these thresholds, the risk of all-cause and cancer mortality decreased by approximately 2.1% (HR 0.979; 95% CI 0.969-0.989) and 3.6% (HR 0.964; 95% CI 0.948-0.981), respectively, with each unit increase in the folate concentration up to the thresholds.
Conclusion: Our study reveals that low serum folate concentrations are linked to an elevated risk of cancer mortality among individuals with cancer within a certain range and supplementation of folate in cancer patients to achieve specific serum folate level threshold (23.7 ng/mL) might reduce the risk of cancer mortality.
{"title":"Association of serum folate concentrations with the mortality of cancer: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Xiaoting Wu, Hailing Zhang, Huanhuan Yang, Ping Zhang, Anlan Xu, Minglong Cai","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03660-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-024-03660-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between serum folate concentrations and the mortality of cancer remains unclear. We aim to investigate the association of serum folate concentrations with all-cause and cause-specific mortality among American adults with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study included 4535 patients with cancer from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999 to 2016 and NHANES III (1988-1994). Death outcomes were ascertained by linkage to National Death Index records through 31 December 2019. Cox proportional hazards model and two-piecewise Cox proportional hazards model were used to calculate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the associations between folate concentrations and the risk of mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up of 37,792 person-years, there were 1998 all-cause deaths and 616 cancer deaths. Non-linear and L-shaped associations were observed between serum folate concentrations and the risk of all-cause and cancer mortality among patients with cancer. Notably, the mortality rates reached a plateau at 23.7 ng/mL for all-cause mortality and 23.57 ng/mL for cancer mortality. When folate levels fell below these thresholds, the risk of all-cause and cancer mortality decreased by approximately 2.1% (HR 0.979; 95% CI 0.969-0.989) and 3.6% (HR 0.964; 95% CI 0.948-0.981), respectively, with each unit increase in the folate concentration up to the thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study reveals that low serum folate concentrations are linked to an elevated risk of cancer mortality among individuals with cancer within a certain range and supplementation of folate in cancer patients to achieve specific serum folate level threshold (23.7 ng/mL) might reduce the risk of cancer mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1299-1309"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142074483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-08-19DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03644-9
Yunyun Lu, Yi Lu
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly aggressive tumor associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and kinase inhibitors has emerged as a promising strategy for liver cancer treatment in recent years. However, the clinical factors predicting the outcomes of combination therapy in patients with advanced liver cancer remain uncertain. Therefore, this study investigated the relationships between clinical predictors and the efficacy of ICI plus kinase inhibitor therapy to personalize treatment plans.
Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 98 patients who received combination treatment with ICIs and kinase inhibitors for advanced HCC. Based on blood lipid levels and other clinical factors prior to treatment, we investigated potential biomarkers that could predict treatment responses in this patient population.
Results: Mean progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in this cohort were 10.1 and 17.2 months, respectively. Via multivariate analysis, the absence of extrahepatic metastasis, the absence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) < 3.225, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) < 140.75, and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) ≥ 37.25 were identified as independent predictors of improved PFS. Factors associated with better OS included PLR < 140.75 and total cholesterol (TC) < 3.46 mmol/L. Univariate analysis identified significant associations of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels, Child-Pugh classification, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), TC, and the receipt of regorafenib with PFS. Additionally, ECOG PS, Child-Pugh classification, AFP, PVT, NLR, PNI, and the receipt of regorafenib were significantly associated with OS.
Conclusions: PLR and TC were potential clinical predictive factors for survival outcomes in patients with advanced HCC who received ICI/kinase inhibitor combination therapy. It is important to know the clinical characteristics of patients prior to treatment initiation to optimize outcomes.
{"title":"Clinical predictive factors of the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and kinase inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular cancer.","authors":"Yunyun Lu, Yi Lu","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03644-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-024-03644-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly aggressive tumor associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and kinase inhibitors has emerged as a promising strategy for liver cancer treatment in recent years. However, the clinical factors predicting the outcomes of combination therapy in patients with advanced liver cancer remain uncertain. Therefore, this study investigated the relationships between clinical predictors and the efficacy of ICI plus kinase inhibitor therapy to personalize treatment plans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled 98 patients who received combination treatment with ICIs and kinase inhibitors for advanced HCC. Based on blood lipid levels and other clinical factors prior to treatment, we investigated potential biomarkers that could predict treatment responses in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in this cohort were 10.1 and 17.2 months, respectively. Via multivariate analysis, the absence of extrahepatic metastasis, the absence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) < 3.225, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) < 140.75, and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) ≥ 37.25 were identified as independent predictors of improved PFS. Factors associated with better OS included PLR < 140.75 and total cholesterol (TC) < 3.46 mmol/L. Univariate analysis identified significant associations of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels, Child-Pugh classification, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), TC, and the receipt of regorafenib with PFS. Additionally, ECOG PS, Child-Pugh classification, AFP, PVT, NLR, PNI, and the receipt of regorafenib were significantly associated with OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PLR and TC were potential clinical predictive factors for survival outcomes in patients with advanced HCC who received ICI/kinase inhibitor combination therapy. It is important to know the clinical characteristics of patients prior to treatment initiation to optimize outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1142-1154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142001256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-08-29DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03636-9
Alejandro Falcón González, María Isabel Gallegos Sancho, Encarnación González Flores, Elena Galve Calvo, Julia Ruiz Vozmediano, Paloma Domingo García, Ricardo López Martos, Elena Sánchez Rivas, Carmen María Iglesias Urraca, Ana Isabel Gómez Calvo, Amaia De Mariscal Polo, Rocío Ramos-Medina, Maria Rivero, Virginia Martínez Marín
Breast cancer, a prevalent malignancy among women, has various physical and psychological impacts. This comprehensive review offers an in-depth look at multidisciplinary dermo-aesthetic intervention approaches, emphasizing the balance between oncological therapies and the management of these effects. The information presented spans specialties such as aesthetic medicine, plastic surgery, dermatology, physiotherapy, nutrition, odontology, and gynecology. This review, which serves as a clinical guide, aims to establish a safe protocol for non-medical interventions involving oncologists, physicians, and specialists from various areas in patients with breast cancer focused on improving their quality of life. This work offers personalized and integrative care strategies for the eradication of cancer. However, it is still necessary for patients to consult with their oncologist before undergoing any dermo aesthetic treatment. However, it is still necessary for patients to consult with their oncologist before undergoing any dermo aesthetic treatment.
{"title":"Beyond cancer treatment: dermo-aesthetic and other wellness recommendations for breast cancer patients.","authors":"Alejandro Falcón González, María Isabel Gallegos Sancho, Encarnación González Flores, Elena Galve Calvo, Julia Ruiz Vozmediano, Paloma Domingo García, Ricardo López Martos, Elena Sánchez Rivas, Carmen María Iglesias Urraca, Ana Isabel Gómez Calvo, Amaia De Mariscal Polo, Rocío Ramos-Medina, Maria Rivero, Virginia Martínez Marín","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03636-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-024-03636-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer, a prevalent malignancy among women, has various physical and psychological impacts. This comprehensive review offers an in-depth look at multidisciplinary dermo-aesthetic intervention approaches, emphasizing the balance between oncological therapies and the management of these effects. The information presented spans specialties such as aesthetic medicine, plastic surgery, dermatology, physiotherapy, nutrition, odontology, and gynecology. This review, which serves as a clinical guide, aims to establish a safe protocol for non-medical interventions involving oncologists, physicians, and specialists from various areas in patients with breast cancer focused on improving their quality of life. This work offers personalized and integrative care strategies for the eradication of cancer. However, it is still necessary for patients to consult with their oncologist before undergoing any dermo aesthetic treatment. However, it is still necessary for patients to consult with their oncologist before undergoing any dermo aesthetic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"909-934"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142114428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-08-07DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03607-0
Ana Rodrigues, Rui Henrique, Carmen Jerónimo, António Araújo
Lung carcinoids are rare tumors representing 1-2% of all invasive lung malignancies. They include typical and atypical carcinoids, whose distinction is made based on the mitotic index and presence or absence of necrosis. The 10-year overall survival for stage IV typical carcinoid is 47% and 18% for atypical carcinoid, reflecting the indolent growth of these tumors. There are limited approved treatment options for them and most of the evidence comes from retrospective analyses, single-arm trials, subgroup analysis of phase II/III trials for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and extrapolation of data from phase III trials for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Management of metastatic lung carcinoids requires a multidisciplinary standardized approach in specialized centers. Treatment should have a dual objective, control of tumor growth and control of symptoms related to hypersecretion syndromes, aiming to improve quality of life and survival. In the continuum of treatment disease, locoregional treatment options need to be considered in parallel with systemic treatments. In this paper, we review the present treatment options and their rational and we give an insight into future alternatives.
{"title":"Management of typical and atypical metastatic lung carcinoids: present and future perspectives.","authors":"Ana Rodrigues, Rui Henrique, Carmen Jerónimo, António Araújo","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03607-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-024-03607-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung carcinoids are rare tumors representing 1-2% of all invasive lung malignancies. They include typical and atypical carcinoids, whose distinction is made based on the mitotic index and presence or absence of necrosis. The 10-year overall survival for stage IV typical carcinoid is 47% and 18% for atypical carcinoid, reflecting the indolent growth of these tumors. There are limited approved treatment options for them and most of the evidence comes from retrospective analyses, single-arm trials, subgroup analysis of phase II/III trials for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and extrapolation of data from phase III trials for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Management of metastatic lung carcinoids requires a multidisciplinary standardized approach in specialized centers. Treatment should have a dual objective, control of tumor growth and control of symptoms related to hypersecretion syndromes, aiming to improve quality of life and survival. In the continuum of treatment disease, locoregional treatment options need to be considered in parallel with systemic treatments. In this paper, we review the present treatment options and their rational and we give an insight into future alternatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"816-823"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141898842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-08-14DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03656-5
Engin Eren Kavak, İsmail Dilli, Güler Yavaş
Objective: High-grade gliomas are aggressive brain tumors with poor prognoses. Understanding the factors that influence their progression is crucial for improving treatment outcomes. This study investigates the prognostic significance of panimmune inflammation in patients diagnosed with high-grade gliomas.
Materials-methods: Data from 89 high-grade glioma patients were analysed retrospectively. The Panimmune inflammation Value (PIV) of each patient meeting the eligibility criteria was calculated on the basis of platelet, monocyte, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts obtained from peripheral blood samples taken on the first day of treatment. PIV is calculated using the following formula: PIV = T × M × N ÷ L. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was employed to identify the optimal cut-off value for PIV about progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes. The primary and secondary endpoints were the differences in OS and PFS between the PIV groups. The Kaplan‒Meier method was used for survival analyses.
Results: The ROC analysis indicated that the optimal PIV threshold was 545.5, which exhibited a significant interaction with PFS and OS outcomes. Patients were subsequently divided into two groups based on their PIV levels: a low PIV (L-PIV) group comprising 45 patients and a high PIV (H-PIV) group comprising 44 patients. A comparative analysis of survival rates indicated that patients with elevated PIV had a shorter median PFS of 4.0 months compared to 8.0 months in the low PIV group (P = 0.797), as well as a reduced median OS of 19.0 months versus not available (NA) in the low PIV group (P = 0.215).
Conclusion: Our study results did not reveal a statistically significant association between H-PIV measurements and reduced PFS or OS. However, PIV effectively stratified newly diagnosed high-grade glioma patients into two distinct groups with significantly different PFS and OS outcomes.
目的:高级别胶质瘤是一种侵袭性脑肿瘤,预后较差。了解影响其进展的因素对于改善治疗效果至关重要。本研究探讨了泛免疫炎症在确诊为高级别胶质瘤患者中的预后意义:回顾性分析了89例高级别胶质瘤患者的数据。根据从治疗第一天采集的外周血样本中获得的血小板、单核细胞、中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞计数,计算符合资格标准的每位患者的泛免疫炎症值(PIV)。PIV 的计算公式如下PIV = T × M × N ÷ L。接受者操作特征(ROC)分析用于确定无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)结果的 PIV 最佳临界值。主要和次要终点是PIV组之间OS和PFS的差异。生存分析采用 Kaplan-Meier 法:ROC分析表明,最佳PIV阈值为545.5,它与PFS和OS结果有显著的交互作用。随后,根据患者的 PIV 水平将其分为两组:低 PIV(L-PIV)组 45 例,高 PIV(H-PIV)组 44 例。生存率比较分析表明,PIV升高组患者的中位PFS为4.0个月,而低PIV组为8.0个月(P=0.797);中位OS为19.0个月,而低PIV组为19.0个月(P=0.215):我们的研究结果显示,H-PIV测量值与缩短的PFS或OS之间没有统计学意义。然而,PIV能有效地将新诊断的高级别胶质瘤患者分为两组,两组患者的PFS和OS结果明显不同。
{"title":"Assessing the prognostic role of panimmune inflammation in high-grade gliomas.","authors":"Engin Eren Kavak, İsmail Dilli, Güler Yavaş","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03656-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-024-03656-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>High-grade gliomas are aggressive brain tumors with poor prognoses. Understanding the factors that influence their progression is crucial for improving treatment outcomes. This study investigates the prognostic significance of panimmune inflammation in patients diagnosed with high-grade gliomas.</p><p><strong>Materials-methods: </strong>Data from 89 high-grade glioma patients were analysed retrospectively. The Panimmune inflammation Value (PIV) of each patient meeting the eligibility criteria was calculated on the basis of platelet, monocyte, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts obtained from peripheral blood samples taken on the first day of treatment. PIV is calculated using the following formula: PIV = T × M × N ÷ L. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was employed to identify the optimal cut-off value for PIV about progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes. The primary and secondary endpoints were the differences in OS and PFS between the PIV groups. The Kaplan‒Meier method was used for survival analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ROC analysis indicated that the optimal PIV threshold was 545.5, which exhibited a significant interaction with PFS and OS outcomes. Patients were subsequently divided into two groups based on their PIV levels: a low PIV (L-PIV) group comprising 45 patients and a high PIV (H-PIV) group comprising 44 patients. A comparative analysis of survival rates indicated that patients with elevated PIV had a shorter median PFS of 4.0 months compared to 8.0 months in the low PIV group (P = 0.797), as well as a reduced median OS of 19.0 months versus not available (NA) in the low PIV group (P = 0.215).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study results did not reveal a statistically significant association between H-PIV measurements and reduced PFS or OS. However, PIV effectively stratified newly diagnosed high-grade glioma patients into two distinct groups with significantly different PFS and OS outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1320-1328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141977120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-08-05DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03632-z
A Amraee, Y Mokhayeri, M Gholami, S Resane, M R Evazi, M Abbasi, M Sadr, Sh Shamsi, P Tayebzadeh, A Jahani, L Darvish
Background: In recent years, evidence has accumulated that a second method of conserving the breast from cancer with re-irradiation as part of treatment may be feasible and safe. Many oncologists are skeptical of breast re-irradiation due to concerns about late complications, so access to quantitative data on the prevalence of breast re-irradiation complications is very important. In this meta-analysis, we determine the prevalence of complications in normal tissue after breast re-irradiation.
Materials and methods: A search was done to recognize qualified studies using EMBASE, MEDLINE, PUBMED, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Collaboration Library electronic databases from 2000 to 2023. In total, ten primary studies were applied in this meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of complications of disorders, skin fibrosis, and chest pain. Heterogeneity was investigated using the I2 index and the meta-regression to evaluate variables suspected of causing heterogeneity. Statistical analysis and synthesis were performed using Stata 17.
Results: The average dose received by patients who underwent radiation therapy in two stages was 100.32 Gy, and in these patients, the prevalence of skin fibrosis and disorders was 47% (95% CI 71-22%; I2 = 96.76%, P < 0.001) and the prevalence of chest pain was 35% (95% CI 68-8%; I2 = 98.13%, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: There is little clinical information about the incidence of complications in breast re-irradiation therapy. This meta-analysis presents the prevalence of complications after breast re-irradiation to help radiation oncologists and physicists make better decisions.
{"title":"Evaluation of normal tissue complications in breast cancer re-irradiation: a meta-analysis study.","authors":"A Amraee, Y Mokhayeri, M Gholami, S Resane, M R Evazi, M Abbasi, M Sadr, Sh Shamsi, P Tayebzadeh, A Jahani, L Darvish","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03632-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-024-03632-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, evidence has accumulated that a second method of conserving the breast from cancer with re-irradiation as part of treatment may be feasible and safe. Many oncologists are skeptical of breast re-irradiation due to concerns about late complications, so access to quantitative data on the prevalence of breast re-irradiation complications is very important. In this meta-analysis, we determine the prevalence of complications in normal tissue after breast re-irradiation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A search was done to recognize qualified studies using EMBASE, MEDLINE, PUBMED, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Collaboration Library electronic databases from 2000 to 2023. In total, ten primary studies were applied in this meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of complications of disorders, skin fibrosis, and chest pain. Heterogeneity was investigated using the I<sup>2</sup> index and the meta-regression to evaluate variables suspected of causing heterogeneity. Statistical analysis and synthesis were performed using Stata 17.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average dose received by patients who underwent radiation therapy in two stages was 100.32 Gy, and in these patients, the prevalence of skin fibrosis and disorders was 47% (95% CI 71-22%; I<sup>2</sup> = 96.76%, P < 0.001) and the prevalence of chest pain was 35% (95% CI 68-8%; I<sup>2</sup> = 98.13%, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is little clinical information about the incidence of complications in breast re-irradiation therapy. This meta-analysis presents the prevalence of complications after breast re-irradiation to help radiation oncologists and physicists make better decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"805-815"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141894742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-08-23DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03620-3
Lijun Huang, Qiurong He, Liping Liu, Jie Huang, Fan Chang
Background: The predictive role of exosomal programmed cell death ligand l (exoPD-L1) in prognosis has been studied extensively; however, there is still no consensus.
Methods: Three databases, including EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science, were searched through January 4, 2024. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were used to identify the relationship between circulating exoPD-L1 and prognosis.
Results: 15 studies with 1091 patients with cancer were included in this statistical analysis. High exoPD-L1 level was correlated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 2.58, 95% CI: 1.75-3.81) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.32-1.98). Meanwhile, we found that dynamic upregulation of circulating exoPD-L1 in the early stages of immunotherapy was a favorable factor for prognosis (PFS: HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23-0.51; OS: HR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.13-0.26).
Conclusion: Circulating exoPD-L1 may be a valuable prognostic indicator for patients with cancer and monitoring its changes in the early stages of immunotherapy might be used to predict tumor response and clinical outcome. This conclusion may not apply to superficial tumors.
{"title":"Correlation between exosomal PD-L1 and prognosis in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Lijun Huang, Qiurong He, Liping Liu, Jie Huang, Fan Chang","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03620-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-024-03620-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The predictive role of exosomal programmed cell death ligand l (exoPD-L1) in prognosis has been studied extensively; however, there is still no consensus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three databases, including EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science, were searched through January 4, 2024. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were used to identify the relationship between circulating exoPD-L1 and prognosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>15 studies with 1091 patients with cancer were included in this statistical analysis. High exoPD-L1 level was correlated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 2.58, 95% CI: 1.75-3.81) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.32-1.98). Meanwhile, we found that dynamic upregulation of circulating exoPD-L1 in the early stages of immunotherapy was a favorable factor for prognosis (PFS: HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23-0.51; OS: HR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.13-0.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Circulating exoPD-L1 may be a valuable prognostic indicator for patients with cancer and monitoring its changes in the early stages of immunotherapy might be used to predict tumor response and clinical outcome. This conclusion may not apply to superficial tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1288-1298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142037636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-08-23DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03668-1
Huihui Li, Ning Chen, Wenjing Wang, Lisha Ye, Yun Fan, Xiaoling Xu
Purpose: The research aimed to evaluate the connection between pre-treatment inflammatory biomarkers and clinical results in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Materials and methods: Between 2019 and 2022, we analyzed 354 individuals diagnosed with metastatic ESCC who underwent immunotherapy. The study sought to evaluate the impact of specific inflammatory biomarkers (Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CRP/ALB) and Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors or steroids usage on the effectiveness and survival outcomes of immunotherapy in advanced ESCC. The research utilized Kaplan‒Meier and Cox regression models alongside propensity score matching for analysis.
Results: The findings revealed that elevated pre-treatment NLR (11.0 vs. 14.6 months, p = 0.021) and CRP/ALB (11.4 vs. 14.6 months, p = 0.022) levels were significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) outcomes, while the use of steroids did not show a significant difference in OS (15.5 vs. 15.4 months, p = 0.685) between groups. Similarly, no notable disparity in OS was observed between patients treated withCOX-2 inhibitors and those who were not (13.8 vs. 11.0 months, p = 0.054).
Conclusion: Lower levels of NLR and CRP/ALB prior to treatment were linked to better effectiveness and OS in immunotherapy for advanced ESCC. The study did not identify a significant relationship between OS in patients with esophageal cancer and the use of either steroids or COX-2 inhibitors.
目的:该研究旨在评估接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)治疗前炎症生物标志物与临床结果之间的联系:在2019年至2022年期间,我们分析了354名确诊为转移性ESCC并接受免疫治疗的患者。该研究旨在评估特定炎症生物标志物(中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、C反应蛋白与白蛋白比值(CRP/ALB)和格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS))、环氧化酶-2(COX-2)抑制剂或类固醇的使用对晚期ESCC免疫疗法疗效和生存结果的影响。研究采用卡普兰-梅耶(Kaplan-Meier)和考克斯回归模型以及倾向得分匹配法进行分析:结果:研究结果显示,治疗前NLR(11.0个月 vs. 14.6个月,p = 0.021)和CRP/ALB(11.4个月 vs. 14.6个月,p = 0.022)水平升高与较差的总生存期(OS)结果显著相关,而使用类固醇对不同组间的OS(15.5个月 vs. 15.4个月,p = 0.685)没有显著差异。同样,接受COX-2抑制剂治疗的患者与未接受治疗的患者在OS方面也没有明显差异(13.8个月 vs. 11.0个月,p = 0.054):结论:治疗前较低水平的NLR和CRP/ALB与晚期ESCC免疫疗法的疗效和OS有关。该研究没有发现食管癌患者的OS与使用类固醇或COX-2抑制剂之间有明显关系。
{"title":"Investigating the impact of the inflammatory immune microenvironment and steroids or COX-2 inhibitors usage on immunotherapy in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): a propensity score matched analysis.","authors":"Huihui Li, Ning Chen, Wenjing Wang, Lisha Ye, Yun Fan, Xiaoling Xu","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03668-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-024-03668-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The research aimed to evaluate the connection between pre-treatment inflammatory biomarkers and clinical results in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between 2019 and 2022, we analyzed 354 individuals diagnosed with metastatic ESCC who underwent immunotherapy. The study sought to evaluate the impact of specific inflammatory biomarkers (Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CRP/ALB) and Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors or steroids usage on the effectiveness and survival outcomes of immunotherapy in advanced ESCC. The research utilized Kaplan‒Meier and Cox regression models alongside propensity score matching for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed that elevated pre-treatment NLR (11.0 vs. 14.6 months, p = 0.021) and CRP/ALB (11.4 vs. 14.6 months, p = 0.022) levels were significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) outcomes, while the use of steroids did not show a significant difference in OS (15.5 vs. 15.4 months, p = 0.685) between groups. Similarly, no notable disparity in OS was observed between patients treated withCOX-2 inhibitors and those who were not (13.8 vs. 11.0 months, p = 0.054).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower levels of NLR and CRP/ALB prior to treatment were linked to better effectiveness and OS in immunotherapy for advanced ESCC. The study did not identify a significant relationship between OS in patients with esophageal cancer and the use of either steroids or COX-2 inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1105-1117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142037637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}