Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-04DOI: 10.1007/s12094-025-04066-x
Antía Gómez-Fernández, Alba Rubio-San-Simón, Sae Ishimaru, Jen-Hao Wu, C Michel Zwaan, Alwin D R Huitema, Francisco Bautista
Purpose: Small-molecule inhibitors have transformed oncology in recent years. This study compared regulatory approvals of these agents across the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), focusing on timelines, dosing recommendations, and pediatric labelling.
Methods: A review of regulatory databases was conducted to identify small-molecule inhibitors approved for adult malignancies. Drug labels were compared to determine dosing concordance (Fully, Partially, or Non-Concordant), approval dates, and pediatric indications. Data extraction involved two independent reviewers.
Results: Fifty-five inhibitors were approved by all three agencies. Adult dosing was Fully Concordant in 49 (89%), partially in 4 (7%), and Non-Concordant in 2 (4%). The median approval gap was 25 months (range: 1-88). FDA granted first approval for 85.5% of agents, followed by PMDA (12.7%) and EMA (1.8%). Among these 55 drugs, only 15 had pediatric indications (27%), 7 of them (46.7%) approved across all three regions. No complete divergence in pediatric dosing was observed, although minimum age thresholds varied.
Discussion: Despite strong alignment in adult dosing, regulatory disparities in approval timelines and pediatric labelling persist, risking delays in therapy availability. More harmonized multinational trials and regulatory alignment could facilitate timely approvals while allowing for population-specific considerations in dosing and safety.
{"title":"Global regulatory variability in small-molecule inhibitor approvals: Differences in timelines, dosing, and pediatric indications across FDA, EMA, and PMDA.","authors":"Antía Gómez-Fernández, Alba Rubio-San-Simón, Sae Ishimaru, Jen-Hao Wu, C Michel Zwaan, Alwin D R Huitema, Francisco Bautista","doi":"10.1007/s12094-025-04066-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-025-04066-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Small-molecule inhibitors have transformed oncology in recent years. This study compared regulatory approvals of these agents across the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), focusing on timelines, dosing recommendations, and pediatric labelling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of regulatory databases was conducted to identify small-molecule inhibitors approved for adult malignancies. Drug labels were compared to determine dosing concordance (Fully, Partially, or Non-Concordant), approval dates, and pediatric indications. Data extraction involved two independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five inhibitors were approved by all three agencies. Adult dosing was Fully Concordant in 49 (89%), partially in 4 (7%), and Non-Concordant in 2 (4%). The median approval gap was 25 months (range: 1-88). FDA granted first approval for 85.5% of agents, followed by PMDA (12.7%) and EMA (1.8%). Among these 55 drugs, only 15 had pediatric indications (27%), 7 of them (46.7%) approved across all three regions. No complete divergence in pediatric dosing was observed, although minimum age thresholds varied.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite strong alignment in adult dosing, regulatory disparities in approval timelines and pediatric labelling persist, risking delays in therapy availability. More harmonized multinational trials and regulatory alignment could facilitate timely approvals while allowing for population-specific considerations in dosing and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1049-1064"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145226334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-09-16DOI: 10.1007/s12094-025-04037-2
Laura Mezquita, Mª Teófila Vicente-Herrero, Patricia Cruz, Mª Victoria Ramírez Íñiguez de la Torre, Julia Hidalgo-Coloma, Luisa Capdevila García, Oscar Gallego, Aitana Calvo, Katerine Martínez, Javier Pérez-Altozano, Raquel Molina, Miguel García-Pardo, Laura Gutiérrez-Sainz, Elena Moreno-Atahonero, Martín Oré-Arce, César Serrano, María Jesús Terradillos-García, María Rosario Valero, Luís Reinoso-Barbero, César A Rodríguez, Beatriz Calvo-Cerrada
Cancer is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in Spain and has a significant impact in the workplace, where exposure to carcinogens in the work environment can increase the risk of developing this disease. The lack of communication between oncologists and occupational physicians limits the accurate assessment of cancer as an occupational disease and as a cause of disability. In 2020, the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Association of Occupational Medicine Specialists (AEEMT) launched a joint initiative to strengthen prevention, reporting, and management of occupational cancer. This consensus provides a structured framework for assessing the occupational origin of cancer, facilitating case notification and classification as occupational contingencies, and supporting informed evaluations of disability and work reintegration in patients with cancer. The collaboration between both societies aims not only to advance occupational cancer prevention but also to promote evidence-based strategies for return-to-work planning.
{"title":"SEOM-AEEMT consensus on occupational cancer and cancer-associated disability.","authors":"Laura Mezquita, Mª Teófila Vicente-Herrero, Patricia Cruz, Mª Victoria Ramírez Íñiguez de la Torre, Julia Hidalgo-Coloma, Luisa Capdevila García, Oscar Gallego, Aitana Calvo, Katerine Martínez, Javier Pérez-Altozano, Raquel Molina, Miguel García-Pardo, Laura Gutiérrez-Sainz, Elena Moreno-Atahonero, Martín Oré-Arce, César Serrano, María Jesús Terradillos-García, María Rosario Valero, Luís Reinoso-Barbero, César A Rodríguez, Beatriz Calvo-Cerrada","doi":"10.1007/s12094-025-04037-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-025-04037-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in Spain and has a significant impact in the workplace, where exposure to carcinogens in the work environment can increase the risk of developing this disease. The lack of communication between oncologists and occupational physicians limits the accurate assessment of cancer as an occupational disease and as a cause of disability. In 2020, the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Association of Occupational Medicine Specialists (AEEMT) launched a joint initiative to strengthen prevention, reporting, and management of occupational cancer. This consensus provides a structured framework for assessing the occupational origin of cancer, facilitating case notification and classification as occupational contingencies, and supporting informed evaluations of disability and work reintegration in patients with cancer. The collaboration between both societies aims not only to advance occupational cancer prevention but also to promote evidence-based strategies for return-to-work planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"880-894"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145071050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-04DOI: 10.1007/s12094-025-04059-w
Maria Garcia-Iruretagoyena, Alejandra Outeiriño-Fernández, Maria Sobrido-Prieto, Amaia Bilbao-González, Alicia González-Mourelle
Objectives: To determine the most effective diagnostic imaging modality including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT), and ultrasound (US) for the identification of regional lymph node involvement in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).
Methods: A search was performed to identify qualified studies using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases from January 2013 to December 2023. The outcome assessed was the diagnostic performance of different imaging techniques in the detection of cervical lymph node metastasis in OSCC, with lymph node yield in neck dissection specimens as the gold standard for validation. Summary estimates for diagnostic performance were sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Differences in sensitivities, specificities, and DOR were tested using a bivariate random effects model.
Results: Twelve observational studies including PET/CT, MRI, and CT alone or combined in OSCC patients were included in the meta-analysis. Data from a single study based on US were insufficient to assess the value of this imaging modality. The pooled estimates of sensitivity were 0.87 for PET/CT, 0.70 for MRI, and 0.66 for CT. The corresponding pooled specificities were 0.79, 0.79, and 0.81, respectively. The DOR was 24.85 for PET/CT, 8.60 for MRI, and 8.59 for CT.
Conclusion: PET/CT may be recommended in clinical practice for detecting cervical metastatic disease in OSCC patients as this technique showed the most favorable diagnostic performance as compared with MRI and CT.
目的:确定最有效的诊断成像方式,包括计算机断层扫描(CT),磁共振成像(MRI),正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)和超声(US),以识别口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)患者的区域淋巴结累及。方法:检索PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science电子数据库中2013年1月至2023年12月的合格研究。评估的结果是不同成像技术在OSCC颈部淋巴结转移检测中的诊断性能,以颈部清扫标本的淋巴结率作为验证的金标准。诊断性能的总结估计是敏感性、特异性和诊断优势比(DOR), 95%置信区间(ci)。使用双变量随机效应模型检验敏感性、特异性和DOR的差异。荟萃分析纳入了12项观察性研究,包括PET/CT、MRI和CT单独或联合用于OSCC患者。基于US的单一研究数据不足以评估这种成像方式的价值。PET/CT的敏感性估计为0.87,MRI为0.70,CT为0.66。相应的合并特异性分别为0.79、0.79和0.81。PET/CT DOR分别为24.85、8.60、8.59。结论:与MRI和CT相比,PET/CT具有较好的诊断效果,可推荐用于临床检查OSCC患者的宫颈转移。
{"title":"Diagnostic imaging modalities to detect regional nodal involvement in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Maria Garcia-Iruretagoyena, Alejandra Outeiriño-Fernández, Maria Sobrido-Prieto, Amaia Bilbao-González, Alicia González-Mourelle","doi":"10.1007/s12094-025-04059-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-025-04059-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the most effective diagnostic imaging modality including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT), and ultrasound (US) for the identification of regional lymph node involvement in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search was performed to identify qualified studies using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases from January 2013 to December 2023. The outcome assessed was the diagnostic performance of different imaging techniques in the detection of cervical lymph node metastasis in OSCC, with lymph node yield in neck dissection specimens as the gold standard for validation. Summary estimates for diagnostic performance were sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Differences in sensitivities, specificities, and DOR were tested using a bivariate random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve observational studies including PET/CT, MRI, and CT alone or combined in OSCC patients were included in the meta-analysis. Data from a single study based on US were insufficient to assess the value of this imaging modality. The pooled estimates of sensitivity were 0.87 for PET/CT, 0.70 for MRI, and 0.66 for CT. The corresponding pooled specificities were 0.79, 0.79, and 0.81, respectively. The DOR was 24.85 for PET/CT, 8.60 for MRI, and 8.59 for CT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PET/CT may be recommended in clinical practice for detecting cervical metastatic disease in OSCC patients as this technique showed the most favorable diagnostic performance as compared with MRI and CT.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"995-1004"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145226268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Endometrial cancer (EC) presents a major global health challenge due to its heterogeneity and complex pathophysiology. The tumor microenvironment (TME), comprising stromal cells, immune cells, endothelial cells, and non-cellular components, critically influences EC progression. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has revolutionized our understanding of EC by revealing TME cellular heterogeneity and interactions. This review synthesizes recent scRNA-seq applications in EC, focusing on two key areas: ① Mapping transcriptional heterogeneity across major cellular components (epithelial, stromal, endothelial, and immune cells); ② Elucidating the factors driving tumor evolution, immune evasion, and differential immunotherapy response. Collectively, these scRNA-seq-derived insights into the dynamic TME ecosystem provide the foundation for translating basic discoveries toward clinical applications. Such advances could thereby promote TME-based personalized therapies and more accurate prognostic predictions.
{"title":"Applications of single-cell transcriptomics: updated insights in endometrial cancer.","authors":"Shuyue Xiao, Huixin Li, Jianyao Liu, Xinyi Xie, Hanzi Xu, Zhen Gong, Shanliang Zhong","doi":"10.1007/s12094-025-04032-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-025-04032-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endometrial cancer (EC) presents a major global health challenge due to its heterogeneity and complex pathophysiology. The tumor microenvironment (TME), comprising stromal cells, immune cells, endothelial cells, and non-cellular components, critically influences EC progression. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has revolutionized our understanding of EC by revealing TME cellular heterogeneity and interactions. This review synthesizes recent scRNA-seq applications in EC, focusing on two key areas: ① Mapping transcriptional heterogeneity across major cellular components (epithelial, stromal, endothelial, and immune cells); ② Elucidating the factors driving tumor evolution, immune evasion, and differential immunotherapy response. Collectively, these scRNA-seq-derived insights into the dynamic TME ecosystem provide the foundation for translating basic discoveries toward clinical applications. Such advances could thereby promote TME-based personalized therapies and more accurate prognostic predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"729-745"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144994345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-08-30DOI: 10.1007/s12094-025-04043-4
Xuze Guo, Yaozu He, Qi Han, Jialin Xie, Yi Jia, You Li, Fanglong Wu
Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) refer to oral mucosal disorders with an increased risk of malignancy, primarily oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), especially in South and Southeast Asia. Since not all patients with OPMDs develop oral cancer, accurate early detection and diagnosis of malignant transformation are critically important for clinicians to determine the optimal therapeutic approach. Therefore, distinguishing OPMDs from early-stage OSCC is an increasing challenge in the clinic. Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has recently been shown to quickly identify high-risk conditions/lesions for screening oral cancer early. Moreover, the AI algorithm can also be used to determine the prognosis of OPMDs. In this review, we systematically summarize the medical records, oral images, pathological examinations, biomarkers, omics data and other aspects of the main outcomes of AI applied to address OPMDs-related issues. Furthermore, we discuss automated diagnostic systems and risk prediction tools for malignant transformation with pleasant outcomes and the potential to ultimately assist clinicians. Finally, we introduce the current challenges and barriers to AI in OPMDs on the premise that more advanced AI models and larger datasets will lead to the use of AI models in OPMDs.
{"title":"Application of artificial intelligence in oral potentially malignant disorders: current opinions and future barriers.","authors":"Xuze Guo, Yaozu He, Qi Han, Jialin Xie, Yi Jia, You Li, Fanglong Wu","doi":"10.1007/s12094-025-04043-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-025-04043-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) refer to oral mucosal disorders with an increased risk of malignancy, primarily oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), especially in South and Southeast Asia. Since not all patients with OPMDs develop oral cancer, accurate early detection and diagnosis of malignant transformation are critically important for clinicians to determine the optimal therapeutic approach. Therefore, distinguishing OPMDs from early-stage OSCC is an increasing challenge in the clinic. Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has recently been shown to quickly identify high-risk conditions/lesions for screening oral cancer early. Moreover, the AI algorithm can also be used to determine the prognosis of OPMDs. In this review, we systematically summarize the medical records, oral images, pathological examinations, biomarkers, omics data and other aspects of the main outcomes of AI applied to address OPMDs-related issues. Furthermore, we discuss automated diagnostic systems and risk prediction tools for malignant transformation with pleasant outcomes and the potential to ultimately assist clinicians. Finally, we introduce the current challenges and barriers to AI in OPMDs on the premise that more advanced AI models and larger datasets will lead to the use of AI models in OPMDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"804-817"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144977407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-09-22DOI: 10.1007/s12094-025-04023-8
Naif Abdullah R Almalki, Mohammed Obaid Alharbi, Mirza Rafi Baig, Salma Naqvi, Fahad A Al-Abbasi, Mohammed Usaid, Firoz Anwar
Background: Breast cancer remains a major global health concern due to its heterogeneous nature influenced by genetic, biological, and environmental factors. Serum biomarkers offer promises for improving diagnostic precision and monitoring treatment response.
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic significance of serum biomarkers including CA-125, CA-19-9, and CA-15-3 in breast cancer patients and to explore associations with clinical and biochemical parameters.
Methods: A retrospective, single-center study was conducted in the Hail region, involving 187 breast cancer patients. Data were extracted from electronic health records. Statistical analyses, including ANOVA and regression models, assessed the relationships between serum biomarkers and clinical variables, such as age, cancer stage, obesity, and laboratory parameters. Serum biomarkers CA-125, CA-19-9, and CA-15-3 were quantified using electro-chemi-luminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) assay with Elecsys kits Roche Diagnostics, with detection limits of ~ 1.0 U/ml and inter-assay variability < 7%.
Results: The highest incidence was observed in women aged 46-55 (26.7%) with obesity present in 50% of cases. Advanced stages (2 and 3) comprised 82.6% of diagnoses. CA-125 levels were elevated in middle-aged patients, while CA-19-9 was higher in younger individuals. CA-15-3 showed increased levels in early-stage cancer, suggesting its utility for early detection. Obesity was linked to increased CA-125 and decreased CA-19-9 levels. Laboratory findings revealed hypocalcemia, elevated bilirubin, high GGT, and increased HbA1c, indicating potential risks of bone metastases, hepatic dysfunction, and poor glycemic control.
Conclusion: Serum biomarkers demonstrate significant diagnostic and prognostic potential in breast cancer management. Findings support the importance of early detection, obesity management, and integrated monitoring to enhance outcomes and reduce relapse risk.
{"title":"Biochemical landscape of breast cancer: integrating serum markers with clinical prognosis and staging.","authors":"Naif Abdullah R Almalki, Mohammed Obaid Alharbi, Mirza Rafi Baig, Salma Naqvi, Fahad A Al-Abbasi, Mohammed Usaid, Firoz Anwar","doi":"10.1007/s12094-025-04023-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-025-04023-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer remains a major global health concern due to its heterogeneous nature influenced by genetic, biological, and environmental factors. Serum biomarkers offer promises for improving diagnostic precision and monitoring treatment response.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic significance of serum biomarkers including CA-125, CA-19-9, and CA-15-3 in breast cancer patients and to explore associations with clinical and biochemical parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, single-center study was conducted in the Hail region, involving 187 breast cancer patients. Data were extracted from electronic health records. Statistical analyses, including ANOVA and regression models, assessed the relationships between serum biomarkers and clinical variables, such as age, cancer stage, obesity, and laboratory parameters. Serum biomarkers CA-125, CA-19-9, and CA-15-3 were quantified using electro-chemi-luminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) assay with Elecsys kits Roche Diagnostics, with detection limits of ~ 1.0 U/ml and inter-assay variability < 7%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest incidence was observed in women aged 46-55 (26.7%) with obesity present in 50% of cases. Advanced stages (2 and 3) comprised 82.6% of diagnoses. CA-125 levels were elevated in middle-aged patients, while CA-19-9 was higher in younger individuals. CA-15-3 showed increased levels in early-stage cancer, suggesting its utility for early detection. Obesity was linked to increased CA-125 and decreased CA-19-9 levels. Laboratory findings revealed hypocalcemia, elevated bilirubin, high GGT, and increased HbA1c, indicating potential risks of bone metastases, hepatic dysfunction, and poor glycemic control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Serum biomarkers demonstrate significant diagnostic and prognostic potential in breast cancer management. Findings support the importance of early detection, obesity management, and integrated monitoring to enhance outcomes and reduce relapse risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1065-1074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145114882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-09-06DOI: 10.1007/s12094-025-04051-4
Amany I Almars, Sameerah Shaheen, Nahlah M Ghouth, Iman S Abumansour, Asim Abdulaziz Khogeer, Fayez Alsulaimani, Ahmed M Basri, Nasser A Elhawary, Tabinda Hasan, Hailah M Almohaimeed
Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most serious health issues around the world, ranking seventh among the most lethal types of cancer and eleventh among the most common types of cancer worldwide. Traditional therapies-such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy-often yield limited success, especially in the advanced stages of EC, prompting the pursuit of novel and more effective treatment strategies. Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising option; nonetheless, its clinical success is hindered by variable patient responses. This underscores the urgent need for predictive biomarkers that can identify patients most likely to benefit from immunotherapeutic interventions. Biomarker-based patient stratification can improve treatment outcomes, prevent unnecessary exposures, and conserve healthcare resources. This review explores established and emerging biomarkers for predicting response to immunotherapy in EC. We discuss these biomarkers by categorizing them into four major groups: (i) tumor-related biomarkers (PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and microsatellite instability), (ii) tumor-immune microenvironment-related biomarkers (tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and immune cell subtypes and ratios), (iii) blood-based biomarkers (circulating tumor DNA, exosomes, and soluble proteins), and (iv) microbiomes (oral, esophageal, and gut microbiomes). In addition, Advancements in biomarker discovery technologies such as high-throughput sequencing, multi-omics approaches, artificial intelligence and machine learning, single-cell analysis, and liquid biopsy are also discussed for their potential to refine biomarker identification and clinical application.
{"title":"Harnessing biomarkers to guide immunotherapy in esophageal cancer: toward precision oncology.","authors":"Amany I Almars, Sameerah Shaheen, Nahlah M Ghouth, Iman S Abumansour, Asim Abdulaziz Khogeer, Fayez Alsulaimani, Ahmed M Basri, Nasser A Elhawary, Tabinda Hasan, Hailah M Almohaimeed","doi":"10.1007/s12094-025-04051-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-025-04051-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most serious health issues around the world, ranking seventh among the most lethal types of cancer and eleventh among the most common types of cancer worldwide. Traditional therapies-such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy-often yield limited success, especially in the advanced stages of EC, prompting the pursuit of novel and more effective treatment strategies. Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising option; nonetheless, its clinical success is hindered by variable patient responses. This underscores the urgent need for predictive biomarkers that can identify patients most likely to benefit from immunotherapeutic interventions. Biomarker-based patient stratification can improve treatment outcomes, prevent unnecessary exposures, and conserve healthcare resources. This review explores established and emerging biomarkers for predicting response to immunotherapy in EC. We discuss these biomarkers by categorizing them into four major groups: (i) tumor-related biomarkers (PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and microsatellite instability), (ii) tumor-immune microenvironment-related biomarkers (tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and immune cell subtypes and ratios), (iii) blood-based biomarkers (circulating tumor DNA, exosomes, and soluble proteins), and (iv) microbiomes (oral, esophageal, and gut microbiomes). In addition, Advancements in biomarker discovery technologies such as high-throughput sequencing, multi-omics approaches, artificial intelligence and machine learning, single-cell analysis, and liquid biopsy are also discussed for their potential to refine biomarker identification and clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"757-776"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145008604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers represent a significant global health burden, accounting for over one-third of cancer-related deaths globally. Regardless of advancements in treatment procedures, the high mortality rate underscores the crucial need for novel diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic strategies. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) appeared as fundamental facilitators of intercellular interaction, influencing gene expression as well as cellular function through the transfer of nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids. EVs play dual roles in maintaining intestinal homeostasis under physiological conditions and driving tumorigenesis in pathological states. In GI cancers, EVs contribute to tumor progression by modulating the tumor microenvironment (TME), promoting angiogenesis, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), immune evasion, and metastasis. Moreover, EVs portray a vital role in creating pre-metastatic site, reprogramming immune cells, and facilitating therapeutic resistance through the transfer of resistance-associated molecules. The clinical potential of EVs extends to their utility as liquid biopsy biomarkers, offering a non-invasive approach for early diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment monitoring. EV-miRNAs and EV-long non-coding RNAs demonstrate significant diagnostic and prognostic value in GI cancers. This review provides a widespread impression of the biogenesis, molecular properties, and functional roles of EVs in GI cancers, with a focus on their clinical utility.
{"title":"Diagnostic and prognostic significance of circulating extracellular vesicles in gastrointestinal cancers.","authors":"Ankita Arora, Vinit Sharma, Anikait Kaushal, Anjali Aggarwal","doi":"10.1007/s12094-025-04055-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-025-04055-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers represent a significant global health burden, accounting for over one-third of cancer-related deaths globally. Regardless of advancements in treatment procedures, the high mortality rate underscores the crucial need for novel diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic strategies. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) appeared as fundamental facilitators of intercellular interaction, influencing gene expression as well as cellular function through the transfer of nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids. EVs play dual roles in maintaining intestinal homeostasis under physiological conditions and driving tumorigenesis in pathological states. In GI cancers, EVs contribute to tumor progression by modulating the tumor microenvironment (TME), promoting angiogenesis, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), immune evasion, and metastasis. Moreover, EVs portray a vital role in creating pre-metastatic site, reprogramming immune cells, and facilitating therapeutic resistance through the transfer of resistance-associated molecules. The clinical potential of EVs extends to their utility as liquid biopsy biomarkers, offering a non-invasive approach for early diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment monitoring. EV-miRNAs and EV-long non-coding RNAs demonstrate significant diagnostic and prognostic value in GI cancers. This review provides a widespread impression of the biogenesis, molecular properties, and functional roles of EVs in GI cancers, with a focus on their clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"777-788"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145041757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-09-03DOI: 10.1007/s12094-025-04022-9
Pilar Mur, Anna Pozuelo, Josep Tabernero, Joan Albanell, Beatriz Bellosillo, Francesc Bosch, Javier Briones, Joan Brunet, Dolors Colomer, Montserrat Domènech, Joan Manel Fontanet, Xavier Matias-Guiu, Ramon Salazar, Rosa Maria Vivanco-Hidalgo, Meritxell Mollà, Lucas Moreno, Aleix Prat, Josep Maria Ribera, Ramón Clèries, Alex Guarga, Josep A Espinàs, Josep Maria Borras
Purpose: The Precision Oncology Program (POP) in Catalonia aims to provide equitable access to molecular testing for individuals with cancer, integrating Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) into clinical practice to inform diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment decisions for both adult and pediatric patients with solid and hematologic malignancies, including somatic and germline alterations. This study evaluates the program's outcomes and impact.
Methods: This evaluation covers the period from the program's implementation in July 2021 through December 2023, with a more detailed analysis focusing on 2022-2023. The program involved 12 reference centers utilizing NGS technology for cancer genetic analysis, coordinated by CatSalut, the regional public health service payer. Data collected from each reference laboratory included the number of tests performed, types of tumor panels used, clinical indications, and associated outcomes.
Results: Between July 2021 and December 2023, a total of 23,135 molecular tests were performed on 22,501 patients. The most frequently analyzed panels were for solid tumors (38.1%), hematologic cancers (17.3%), and germline mutations (42.2%). Pediatric patients accounted for 2.4% of the total. Notably, 24.7% of patients underwent a change in clinical management, contributing to more targeted treatment strategies, particularly in solid tumors (58.7%). Reports were delivered within an average of four weeks, meeting program benchmarks and facilitating timely decision-making. Sample submission compliance was high, reaching 98.5%.
Conclusions: This POP successfully addressed operational, financial, and logistic challenges, ensuring equitable access to molecular testing. This program led to more efficient and personalized clinical management, with growing impact on cancer care and patient outcomes.
{"title":"Implementation of the precision oncology program in catalonia's public health system: results, lessons learned, and future prospects.","authors":"Pilar Mur, Anna Pozuelo, Josep Tabernero, Joan Albanell, Beatriz Bellosillo, Francesc Bosch, Javier Briones, Joan Brunet, Dolors Colomer, Montserrat Domènech, Joan Manel Fontanet, Xavier Matias-Guiu, Ramon Salazar, Rosa Maria Vivanco-Hidalgo, Meritxell Mollà, Lucas Moreno, Aleix Prat, Josep Maria Ribera, Ramón Clèries, Alex Guarga, Josep A Espinàs, Josep Maria Borras","doi":"10.1007/s12094-025-04022-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-025-04022-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Precision Oncology Program (POP) in Catalonia aims to provide equitable access to molecular testing for individuals with cancer, integrating Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) into clinical practice to inform diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment decisions for both adult and pediatric patients with solid and hematologic malignancies, including somatic and germline alterations. This study evaluates the program's outcomes and impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This evaluation covers the period from the program's implementation in July 2021 through December 2023, with a more detailed analysis focusing on 2022-2023. The program involved 12 reference centers utilizing NGS technology for cancer genetic analysis, coordinated by CatSalut, the regional public health service payer. Data collected from each reference laboratory included the number of tests performed, types of tumor panels used, clinical indications, and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between July 2021 and December 2023, a total of 23,135 molecular tests were performed on 22,501 patients. The most frequently analyzed panels were for solid tumors (38.1%), hematologic cancers (17.3%), and germline mutations (42.2%). Pediatric patients accounted for 2.4% of the total. Notably, 24.7% of patients underwent a change in clinical management, contributing to more targeted treatment strategies, particularly in solid tumors (58.7%). Reports were delivered within an average of four weeks, meeting program benchmarks and facilitating timely decision-making. Sample submission compliance was high, reaching 98.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This POP successfully addressed operational, financial, and logistic challenges, ensuring equitable access to molecular testing. This program led to more efficient and personalized clinical management, with growing impact on cancer care and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1030-1039"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144976555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-24DOI: 10.1007/s12094-025-04095-6
Alper Türkel, Sultan Çiğdem Irkkan, İlknur Deliktaş Onur, Cengiz Karaçin
Purpose: Investigation of 'HER2-ultralow' prevalence and the effects of HER2 status (HER2-null vs. HER2-ultralow) on prognosis in patients with early-stage (non-metastatic) breast cancer.
Methods/patients: This single-center, retrospective study analyzed 424 patients with early-stage, CerbB2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) score 0 breast cancer. Pathological re-review classified tumors as HER2-ultralow (≤ 10% of tumor cells with faint, incomplete membrane staining) or HER2-null (no staining). The cohorts were stratified by estrogen receptor (ER) status into ER + (≥ 1%) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) groups.
Results: This study included 235 ER + and 189 TNBC patients. HER2-ultralow frequency was 30.6% (n = 72) in the ER + group and 18% (n = 34) in the TNBC group. In the ER + group, higher Ki67 and increasing stage were associated with worse 5 year disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.006 and p < 0.001, respectively), while HER2 status had no significant effect on 5-year DFS (p = 0.269). In the TNBC group, HER2-ultralow patients had worse 5-year DFS than HER2-null patients (67% vs. 74.1%, p = 0.048). In multivariate analysis, HER2 status was a statistically significant prognostic factor [(HR: 0.34 (0.145-0.841), p = 0.019)]. Despite a numerically worse 5 year overall survival (OS) rate in HER2-ultralow versus HER2-null patients (73.2% vs. 79.5%), the difference was statistically insignificant (p = 0.114).
Conclusions: In TNBC, HER2-ultralow was a poor prognostic factor associated with inferior 5 year DFS compared to HER2-null, while no difference was observed in the ER + cohort. These findings suggest that HER2-ultralow status may identify a TNBC subgroup that warrants novel therapies, such as T-DXd, although validation in larger studies is needed.
{"title":"Investigation of the prevalence of HER2-ultralow and the effects of HER2 status (HER2-null vs. HER2-ultralow) on survival in HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer.","authors":"Alper Türkel, Sultan Çiğdem Irkkan, İlknur Deliktaş Onur, Cengiz Karaçin","doi":"10.1007/s12094-025-04095-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12094-025-04095-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Investigation of 'HER2-ultralow' prevalence and the effects of HER2 status (HER2-null vs. HER2-ultralow) on prognosis in patients with early-stage (non-metastatic) breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods/patients: </strong>This single-center, retrospective study analyzed 424 patients with early-stage, CerbB2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) score 0 breast cancer. Pathological re-review classified tumors as HER2-ultralow (≤ 10% of tumor cells with faint, incomplete membrane staining) or HER2-null (no staining). The cohorts were stratified by estrogen receptor (ER) status into ER + (≥ 1%) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 235 ER + and 189 TNBC patients. HER2-ultralow frequency was 30.6% (n = 72) in the ER + group and 18% (n = 34) in the TNBC group. In the ER + group, higher Ki67 and increasing stage were associated with worse 5 year disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.006 and p < 0.001, respectively), while HER2 status had no significant effect on 5-year DFS (p = 0.269). In the TNBC group, HER2-ultralow patients had worse 5-year DFS than HER2-null patients (67% vs. 74.1%, p = 0.048). In multivariate analysis, HER2 status was a statistically significant prognostic factor [(HR: 0.34 (0.145-0.841), p = 0.019)]. Despite a numerically worse 5 year overall survival (OS) rate in HER2-ultralow versus HER2-null patients (73.2% vs. 79.5%), the difference was statistically insignificant (p = 0.114).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In TNBC, HER2-ultralow was a poor prognostic factor associated with inferior 5 year DFS compared to HER2-null, while no difference was observed in the ER + cohort. These findings suggest that HER2-ultralow status may identify a TNBC subgroup that warrants novel therapies, such as T-DXd, although validation in larger studies is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"924-933"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145356763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}