Chirurg最新文献

The treatment spectrum for ulcerative colitis has greatly increased in recent years. Mesalazine is still the standard drug treatment for uncomplicated ulcerative colitis in various forms of administration. Glucocorticoids are highly effective in the acute treatment of ulcerative colitis but should only be used on a short-term basis due to the pronounced side effects. For forms with a complicated course of ulcerative colitis, immunosuppressive and immunomodulating substances, such as azothioprine as well as various biologicals, Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor agonists (S1PR agonists) and calcineurin inhibitors are available after failure of conventional treatment. A proctocolectomy should be considered in cases of a treatment-refractive course or with detection of carcinomas and high-grade epithelial dysplasia.

In order to be able to exploit the increasing complexity of modern surgery as best as possible in the future, the focus of young surgeons is on horizontal networking in addition to vertical networking: More interdisciplinary cooperation, more diversity, more perspectives. Future effective project work thrives on the exchange of young specialist society forums, junior resident spokespersons and junior student representation. However, the increasing establishment of mentoring programs and the experiences from daily practice show that this does not work without the experience and the readiness of the "greats" to impart knowledge. This article sketches the current challenges for the next generation of surgeons in the three fields of surgical training, life and surgery as well as promotion of excellence in academic surgery.

Endoscopy is the leading method in the diagnostics of gastrointestinal malignancies. With the increasing incidences of various tumor entities, a palliative treatment situation is already present in many patients despite an increasing number of screening strategies. Palliative endoscopy can make an essential contribution to alleviation of tumor-related symptoms, such as dysphagia, malnutrition, cholestasis, ileus and pain. Various approaches can be offered to safeguard the nutrition, e.g. percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ), for maintenance of the gastrointestinal passage (stents) and secretion drainage or to drain congested hollow organs. Furthermore, in cases of inaccessibility or impassability of stenoses due to tumors, endosonographically assisted punctures offer the possibility to guarantee new drainage options or continuities by stent placement. In all interventions possible contraindications and complications must be taken into account.

For (locally advanced) rectal cancer, a multimodal therapy concept comprising neoadjuvant radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy, radical surgical resection with partial/complete mesorectal excision and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy represents the current international standard of care. Further developments in neoadjuvant therapy concepts, such as the principle of total neoadjuvant therapy, lead to an increasing number of patients who show a complete clinical response in restaging after neoadjuvant therapy without clinically detectable residual tumor. In view of the risk associated with radical surgical resection in terms of perioperative morbidity and a potentially non-continence-preserving procedure, the question of the oncological justifiability of an organ-preserving procedure in the case of a complete clinical response under neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly being raised. The therapeutic principle of watch and wait, defined by refraining from immediate radical surgical resection and inclusion in a close-meshed, structured follow-up program, currently appears to be oncologically justifiable based on the current study situation; however, for the initial evaluation of the extent of the clinical response and for the structuring of the close-meshed follow-up program, further optimization and standardization based on broadly designed studies appear necessary in order to be able to provide this concept to a clearly defined patient collective as an oncologically equivalent therapy principle also outside specialized centers.

A relevant number of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma show a locoregional complete response of the tumor in the resected material after neoadjuvant therapy with modern chemotherapy and chemoradiation protocols. Due to a high rate of perioperative morbidity and decreased long-term quality of life following esophagectomy, the current treatment algorithm with neoadjuvant therapy and post-neoadjuvant esophagectomy on principle is critically questioned. An individualized treatment algorithm with extended clinical evaluation of post-neoadjuvant remission status and esophagectomy as needed is discussed. Patients with complete remission after neoadjuvant therapy are identified in an extended restaging protocol. Cases of clinical complete remission are treated with an active surveillance concept with esophagectomy as needed, i.e. surgery only when a local tumor recurrence is detected. Retrospective cohort studies have suggested that the active surveillance concept with esophagectomy as needed does not lead to a deterioration of overall survival rates in the patient collective. European prospective randomized, controlled, noninferiority studies with an oncological endpoint are currently evaluating the possibilities of organ-preserving concepts for clinical complete remission of esophageal cancer.