首页 > 最新文献

Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology最新文献

英文 中文
Trajectories of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Use in Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes: A Longitudinal Register Study 选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在妊娠和围产期预后中的应用轨迹:一项纵向登记研究
IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-20 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.18337
Guro Pauck Bernhardsen, Maiju Pesonen, Leea Keski-Nisula, Hedvig Nordeng, Soili M. Lehto

Objective

We examined the possible impact of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)-trajectories describing the timing of different SSRI dosages on adverse perinatal outcomes.

Design

Longitudinal register study.

Setting

Study from Kuopio University Hospital Birth Register.

Population or Sample

Altogether 553 mothers who reported using SSRIs in pregnancy were matched to a five-fold comparison group (n = 2765), based on depression, psychiatric diagnoses and age.

Methods

We applied unsupervised k-Means longitudinal clustering to identify four distinct patterns of SSRI use, and propensity score adjusted regression models based on generalised estimating equations to examine the associations between the exposure groups and the perinatal outcomes, using the unexposed group as reference. Secondary analyses assessed linear associations between average SSRI dose and outcomes.

Main Outcome Measures

Birth weight, placental weight, placental-to-birth-weight ratio (PBWR), umbilical cord length, gestational length, preterm birth (< 37 gestational weeks), low 5-min Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.

Results

Compared to the no SSRI group, we found no associations between the use of SSRI up to standard doses and the perinatal outcomes. However, the sustained high dose group (~twice the standard dose) displayed higher placental weight (B = 36.9, 95% CI = 3.2, 70.7) and PBWR (B = 1.54, 95% CI = 0.70, 2.38), and the risk of NICU admission was 2-fold (95% CI = 1.05, 3.76), compared with the no SSRI group. The average SSRI dose was linearly associated with placental weight, PBWR, and umbilical cord length.

Conclusions

SSRI use up to standard doses was not associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. However, linear dose–response associations and sustained higher doses suggest potentially reduced placental efficacy and increased risk of adverse perinatal health, warranting caution.

目的研究选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)可能对围产期不良结局的影响——不同SSRI剂量的使用时间轨迹。设计纵向登记研究。来自库奥皮奥大学医院出生登记的背景研究。总体或样本:根据抑郁、精神诊断和年龄,553名报告在怀孕期间使用ssri类药物的母亲被匹配到一个五倍的对照组(n = 2765)。方法采用无监督k - Means纵向聚类方法识别四种不同的SSRI使用模式,并基于广义估计方程的倾向评分调整回归模型,以未暴露组为参照,研究暴露组与围产期结局之间的关系。二次分析评估了平均SSRI剂量与结果之间的线性关联。主要观察指标:出生体重、胎盘体重、胎盘与出生体重比(PBWR)、脐带长度、妊娠长度、早产(37孕周)、低5分钟Apgar评分、新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院。结果与未使用SSRI的组相比,我们发现使用标准剂量的SSRI与围产期结局之间没有关联。然而,持续高剂量组(约为标准剂量的两倍)表现出更高的胎盘重量(B = 36.9, 95% CI = 3.2, 70.7)和PBWR (B = 1.54, 95% CI = 0.70, 2.38),入院NICU的风险为2倍(95% CI = 1.05, 3.76)。SSRI的平均剂量与胎盘重量、胎厚比和脐带长度呈线性相关。结论使用标准剂量的sssri与不良围产期结局无关。然而,线性剂量-反应关联和持续较高剂量提示胎盘疗效可能降低,围产期不良健康风险增加,需要谨慎。
{"title":"Trajectories of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Use in Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes: A Longitudinal Register Study","authors":"Guro Pauck Bernhardsen,&nbsp;Maiju Pesonen,&nbsp;Leea Keski-Nisula,&nbsp;Hedvig Nordeng,&nbsp;Soili M. Lehto","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18337","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1471-0528.18337","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We examined the possible impact of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)-trajectories describing the timing of different SSRI dosages on adverse perinatal outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Design</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Longitudinal register study.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Setting</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Study from Kuopio University Hospital Birth Register.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Population or Sample</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Altogether 553 mothers who reported using SSRIs in pregnancy were matched to a five-fold comparison group (<i>n</i> = 2765), based on depression, psychiatric diagnoses and age.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We applied unsupervised k-Means longitudinal clustering to identify four distinct patterns of SSRI use, and propensity score adjusted regression models based on generalised estimating equations to examine the associations between the exposure groups and the perinatal outcomes, using the unexposed group as reference. Secondary analyses assessed linear associations between average SSRI dose and outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Birth weight, placental weight, placental-to-birth-weight ratio (PBWR), umbilical cord length, gestational length, preterm birth (&lt; 37 gestational weeks), low 5-min Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Compared to the no SSRI group, we found no associations between the use of SSRI up to standard doses and the perinatal outcomes. However, the sustained high dose group (~twice the standard dose) displayed higher placental weight (<i>B</i> = 36.9, 95% CI = 3.2, 70.7) and PBWR (<i>B</i> = 1.54, 95% CI = 0.70, 2.38), and the risk of NICU admission was 2-fold (95% CI = 1.05, 3.76), compared with the no SSRI group. The average SSRI dose was linearly associated with placental weight, PBWR, and umbilical cord length.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>SSRI use up to standard doses was not associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. However, linear dose–response associations and sustained higher doses suggest potentially reduced placental efficacy and increased risk of adverse perinatal health, warranting caution.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"133 1","pages":"83-94"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144899542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Displacement on Refugee Women's Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Participatory Study Using Photovoice 流离失所对难民妇女性健康和生殖健康的影响:一项使用Photovoice的参与性研究。
IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-19 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.18328
Jamilah Sherally, Franceska Dnestrianschii, Zainab Alshamari, Ekram Beshir, Habibe Jafari, Masume Jafari, Kowthar Mohamed, Semira Mohammadyasin, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Thomas van den Akker, Marielle Le Mat, Saskia Elise Duijs

Objective

To explore how displacement impacts the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) of refugee women.

Design

Participatory photovoice study integrating photography with qualitative inquiry.

Setting

Conducted online between February and May 2024.

Population

Six refugee women formerly residing in Moria Reception and Identification Centre or Mavrovouni Closed Controlled Access Centre on Lesbos, Greece, now seeking asylum across Europe and the United States.

Methods

During the participatory photovoice study, participants (N = 6) took photographs reflecting the impact of displacement on their SRH and mental health. Visual data were explored in three focus groups and five in-depth interviews. Participants grouped photographs into themes, with additional thematic coding by the academic researchers. An intersectional lens guided the analysis.

Results

Thirty-six photographs, many including nature symbolism, illustrated how displacement shaped SRH experiences, healthcare-seeking behaviour and access to care for gender-based violence, female genital mutilation/cutting, family planning and menstrual, maternal, and gynaecological health. Eight themes emerged: bodily autonomy, instability, living conditions, social support, celebrations, healthcare access, resilience, and finding purpose. While displacement exacerbated SRH needs and undermined bodily autonomy, the instability of the asylum process led to deprioritisation of healthcare-seeking. Illness was only experienced until a sense of safety was established. Access to healthcare was compromised by language barriers, undignified treatment, and financial constraints. Despite challenges, narratives highlighted resilience, community, and personal growth.

Conclusions

Trauma-informed, culturally sensitive healthcare is essential for SRH equity among refugee women. Refugee-led visual research offers a transformative tool for knowledge production and advocacy.

目的:探讨流离失所如何影响难民妇女的性健康和生殖健康(SRH)。设计:将摄影与质性探究相结合的参与式照片声音研究。设置:2024年2月至5月在线进行。人口:六名难民妇女以前居住在希腊莱斯博斯岛的莫里亚接待和身份查验中心或马夫罗沃尼封闭控制通道中心,现在在欧洲和美国各地寻求庇护。方法:在参与式照片语音研究中,参与者(N = 6)拍摄了反映流离失所对其SRH和心理健康影响的照片。视觉数据通过三个焦点小组和五个深度访谈进行了探讨。参与者将照片按主题分组,并由学术研究人员进行额外的主题编码。交叉透镜指导了分析。结果:36张照片,其中许多包括自然象征,说明流离失所如何影响性健康和生殖健康经历、寻求医疗保健行为和获得基于性别的暴力、切割女性生殖器官、计划生育和月经、孕产妇和妇科健康方面的护理。出现了八个主题:身体自主、不稳定、生活条件、社会支持、庆祝、医疗保健、恢复力和寻找目标。流离失所加剧了性健康和生殖健康的需求,损害了人身自主权,而庇护程序的不稳定导致寻求医疗保健的机会被剥夺。直到有了安全感,人们才会经历疾病。由于语言障碍、不体面的治疗和财政限制,人们无法获得医疗保健服务。尽管面临挑战,但叙事强调了韧性、社区和个人成长。结论:了解创伤情况、对文化敏感的保健对难民妇女的性健康和健康平等至关重要。难民主导的视觉研究为知识生产和宣传提供了一种变革性工具。
{"title":"Impact of Displacement on Refugee Women's Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Participatory Study Using Photovoice","authors":"Jamilah Sherally,&nbsp;Franceska Dnestrianschii,&nbsp;Zainab Alshamari,&nbsp;Ekram Beshir,&nbsp;Habibe Jafari,&nbsp;Masume Jafari,&nbsp;Kowthar Mohamed,&nbsp;Semira Mohammadyasin,&nbsp;Maria van den Muijsenbergh,&nbsp;Thomas van den Akker,&nbsp;Marielle Le Mat,&nbsp;Saskia Elise Duijs","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18328","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1471-0528.18328","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To explore how displacement impacts the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) of refugee women.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Design</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Participatory photovoice study integrating photography with qualitative inquiry.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Setting</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Conducted online between February and May 2024.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Population</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Six refugee women formerly residing in Moria Reception and Identification Centre or Mavrovouni Closed Controlled Access Centre on Lesbos, Greece, now seeking asylum across Europe and the United States.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>During the participatory photovoice study, participants (<i>N</i> = 6) took photographs reflecting the impact of displacement on their SRH and mental health. Visual data were explored in three focus groups and five in-depth interviews. Participants grouped photographs into themes, with additional thematic coding by the academic researchers. An intersectional lens guided the analysis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Thirty-six photographs, many including nature symbolism, illustrated how displacement shaped SRH experiences, healthcare-seeking behaviour and access to care for gender-based violence, female genital mutilation/cutting, family planning and menstrual, maternal, and gynaecological health. Eight themes emerged: bodily autonomy, instability, living conditions, social support, celebrations, healthcare access, resilience, and finding purpose. While displacement exacerbated SRH needs and undermined bodily autonomy, the instability of the asylum process led to deprioritisation of healthcare-seeking. Illness was only experienced until a sense of safety was established. Access to healthcare was compromised by language barriers, undignified treatment, and financial constraints. Despite challenges, narratives highlighted resilience, community, and personal growth.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Trauma-informed, culturally sensitive healthcare is essential for SRH equity among refugee women. Refugee-led visual research offers a transformative tool for knowledge production and advocacy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 13","pages":"2204-2216"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18328","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144876637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to ‘Trustworthiness Criteria for Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Studies: OBGYN Journal Guidelines’ 更正“随机对照研究荟萃分析的可信度标准:妇产科杂志指南”。
IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-18 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.18336

The OBGYN Editors' Integrity Group (OGEIG) “Trustworthiness Criteria for Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Studies: OBGYN,” Journal Guidelines BJOG 132(2025): 1–5 10.1111/1471-0528.17945.

In the list of participating members of the OBGYN Editors' Integrity Group (OGEIG), Dr Luis Sanchez-Ramos’ affiliation was incorrectly stated as Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM, and should have been given as Am J Obstet Gynecol.

The online version of the article has now been rectified.

We apologize for this error.

OBGYN编辑诚信组(OGEIG)“随机对照研究荟集分析的可信度标准:OBGYN”,杂志指南BJOG 132(2025): 1-5 10.1111/1471-0528.17945。在妇产科编辑诚信小组(OGEIG)的参与成员名单中,Luis Sanchez-Ramos医生的隶属关系被错误地填写为Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM,应该填写为Am J Obstet Gynecol。这篇文章的网络版现已被更正。我们为这个错误道歉。
{"title":"Correction to ‘Trustworthiness Criteria for Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Studies: OBGYN Journal Guidelines’","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18336","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1471-0528.18336","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The OBGYN Editors' Integrity Group (OGEIG) “Trustworthiness Criteria for Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Studies: OBGYN,” Journal Guidelines BJOG 132(2025): 1–5 10.1111/1471-0528.17945.</p><p>In the list of participating members of the OBGYN Editors' Integrity Group (OGEIG), Dr Luis Sanchez-Ramos’ affiliation was incorrectly stated as <i>Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM</i>, and should have been given as <i>Am J Obstet Gynecol</i>.</p><p>The online version of the article has now been rectified.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18336","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144876636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
BGCS—ASM 2025 London Publication of Abstracts BGCS-ASM 2025伦敦文摘出版
IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-17 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.18309
{"title":"BGCS—ASM 2025 London Publication of Abstracts","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18309","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1471-0528.18309","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 S7","pages":"3-101"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18309","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144861716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Disparities in Location of Service and Management of Early Pregnancy Loss: A Retrospective Cohort Study 早期妊娠丢失的服务和管理地点的差异:一项回顾性队列研究。
IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-15 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.18324
Sarah Martinez, Christiana Johnson, Seetha Davis, Lindsey Cypen, Sara Neill

Objective

To examine differences in the location of service and management for patients receiving early pregnancy loss (EPL) care based on racial/ethnic identity.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

A single university-affiliated urban tertiary care centre in the United States.

Population

A cohort of 796 received care for EPL at a single university-affiliated urban tertiary care centre from July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2023.

Methods

Descriptive statistics for demographic factors were generated, reporting frequencies and percentages; continuous variables were expressed as a mean with standard deviation; and chi-squared tests were performed. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the demographics of this patient population and the frequency of location of service and management type. Multivariate logistic regression models assessed the relationship between the location of services (ED and GYN triage vs. other), management type (expectant vs. active management) and patient race and ethnicity. Statistics are reported as adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Main Outcome Measures

Location of service, management type.

Results

There were differences in care location and management based on race/ethnicity. Black and Hispanic/Latinx patients were more likely to receive care in the emergency department or gynaecology triage compared to their White counterparts. Black patients were also more likely to receive expectant management and office procedural management compared to their White counterparts. Receiving treatment in the emergency department or gynaecology triage was associated with expectant management.

Conclusions

Racial disparities exist in both location of service and management type for EPL.

目的探讨不同种族/民族接受早孕丢失(EPL)护理的患者在服务地点和管理方面的差异。设计回顾性队列研究。美国唯一一个大学附属的城市三级医疗中心。从2021年7月1日至2023年6月30日,796名队列患者在一所大学附属的城市三级医疗中心接受EPL治疗。方法对人口学因素进行描述性统计,报告频率和百分比;连续变量用带标准差的均值表示;并进行卡方检验。描述性统计用于描述该患者人群的人口统计数据以及服务地点和管理类型的频率。多变量logistic回归模型评估了服务地点(ED和GYN分诊与其他分诊)、管理类型(期待与积极管理)和患者种族和民族之间的关系。统计数据以调整优势比(aOR)和95%置信区间(CI)报告。主要评价指标服务地点、管理类型。结果不同种族患者在护理地点和管理上存在差异。与白人患者相比,黑人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者更有可能在急诊科或妇科分诊接受治疗。与白人患者相比,黑人患者也更有可能接受预期管理和办公室程序管理。在急诊科或妇科分诊接受治疗与期望管理有关。结论EPL在服务地点和管理方式上存在种族差异。
{"title":"Disparities in Location of Service and Management of Early Pregnancy Loss: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Sarah Martinez,&nbsp;Christiana Johnson,&nbsp;Seetha Davis,&nbsp;Lindsey Cypen,&nbsp;Sara Neill","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18324","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1471-0528.18324","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To examine differences in the location of service and management for patients receiving early pregnancy loss (EPL) care based on racial/ethnic identity.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Design</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Setting</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A single university-affiliated urban tertiary care centre in the United States.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Population</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A cohort of 796 received care for EPL at a single university-affiliated urban tertiary care centre from July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2023.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Descriptive statistics for demographic factors were generated, reporting frequencies and percentages; continuous variables were expressed as a mean with standard deviation; and chi-squared tests were performed. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the demographics of this patient population and the frequency of location of service and management type. Multivariate logistic regression models assessed the relationship between the location of services (ED and GYN triage vs. other), management type (expectant vs. active management) and patient race and ethnicity. Statistics are reported as adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Location of service, management type.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>There were differences in care location and management based on race/ethnicity. Black and Hispanic/Latinx patients were more likely to receive care in the emergency department or gynaecology triage compared to their White counterparts. Black patients were also more likely to receive expectant management and office procedural management compared to their White counterparts. Receiving treatment in the emergency department or gynaecology triage was associated with expectant management.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Racial disparities exist in both location of service and management type for EPL.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 13","pages":"2198-2203"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144857729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conversations About Stillbirth Risk in Routine Antenatal Care: A Qualitative Study Post-Implementation of the Safer Baby Bundle 关于死产风险的对话在常规产前保健:一项定性研究后实施更安全的婴儿束。
IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-13 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.18330
Christine Andrews, Ashley Pade, Fran Boyle, Dan Richard Fernandez, Laura Singline, Ann Lancaster, David Alan Ellwood, Adrienne Gordon, Vicki J. Flenady
<div> <section> <h3> Objective</h3> <p>This study explores women's and healthcare professionals' experiences and attitudes towards stillbirth risk and prevention conversations following Safer Baby Bundle (SBB) implementation. The SBB aimed to normalise these conversations within the antenatal healthcare setting.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Design</h3> <p>A qualitative interview study.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Setting</h3> <p>Maternity services in two states in Australia.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Population of Sample</h3> <p>Eighteen postnatal women and 22 healthcare professionals at services that participated in the SBB.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews analysed using a deductive approach to thematic analysis.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3> <p>Themes identified around experiences of and attitudes towards antenatal care and conversations related to stillbirth risk and prevention.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>Three key themes related to conversations about stillbirth in antenatal care were identified. First, ‘the importance of information that reassures and empowers’ through respectful communication, emphasising the ‘why’ of preventive actions, prioritising conversations over written information and positive framing. Second, ‘normalising sensitive conversations’ by reducing silence and stigma around stillbirth, having a standard way of doing things and shifting perceptions about the difficulty of raising this topic during pregnancy. Third, ‘steps towards respectful and supportive woman-centred care’ influence the efficacy and responsiveness of conversations through continuity of care and carer for trust-building and an ethos of addressing what matters most to women.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusions</h3> <p>Integrating conversations about stillbirth into routine antenatal care is facilitated by the SBB. Key considerations for effective, woman-centred conversations about stillbirth include multidisciplinary collaboration, targeted HCP training and co-designed resources to promote open communication, reducing fragmentation of c
目的:本研究探讨妇女和卫生保健专业人员的经验和态度死产风险和预防对话后,更安全的婴儿束(SBB)实施。SBB的目标是在产前保健环境中使这些对话正常化。设计:定性访谈研究。背景:澳大利亚两个州的产妇服务。样本人口:参加SBB的18名产后妇女和22名保健专业人员。方法:采用半结构化访谈进行定性研究,采用演绎方法进行主题分析。主要结果测量:围绕产前保健的经验和态度以及与死产风险和预防有关的对话确定了主题。结果:三个关键主题相关的谈话死胎产前护理确定。首先,通过相互尊重的沟通,强调“为什么”要采取预防行动,优先考虑对话而不是书面信息和积极框架,“信息的重要性使人安心和赋权”。其次,通过减少对死产的沉默和污名化来“使敏感的对话正常化”,有一种标准的做事方式,并改变人们对怀孕期间提出这个话题的困难的看法。第三,“迈向尊重和支持以妇女为中心的护理的步骤”通过持续的护理和护理来建立信任,以及解决对妇女最重要的问题的精神,影响对话的有效性和响应性。结论:SBB促进了将关于死产的对话纳入常规产前保健。就死产进行有效的、以妇女为中心的对话的关键考虑因素包括多学科合作、有针对性的卫生保健服务培训和共同设计资源,以促进公开沟通、减少护理的碎片化和采用基于优势的方法来讨论风险。试验注册:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册数据库:ACTRN12619001777189(2019年12月16日)。
{"title":"Conversations About Stillbirth Risk in Routine Antenatal Care: A Qualitative Study Post-Implementation of the Safer Baby Bundle","authors":"Christine Andrews,&nbsp;Ashley Pade,&nbsp;Fran Boyle,&nbsp;Dan Richard Fernandez,&nbsp;Laura Singline,&nbsp;Ann Lancaster,&nbsp;David Alan Ellwood,&nbsp;Adrienne Gordon,&nbsp;Vicki J. Flenady","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18330","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1471-0528.18330","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objective&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This study explores women's and healthcare professionals' experiences and attitudes towards stillbirth risk and prevention conversations following Safer Baby Bundle (SBB) implementation. The SBB aimed to normalise these conversations within the antenatal healthcare setting.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Design&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;A qualitative interview study.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Setting&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Maternity services in two states in Australia.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Population of Sample&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Eighteen postnatal women and 22 healthcare professionals at services that participated in the SBB.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews analysed using a deductive approach to thematic analysis.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Main Outcome Measures&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Themes identified around experiences of and attitudes towards antenatal care and conversations related to stillbirth risk and prevention.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Three key themes related to conversations about stillbirth in antenatal care were identified. First, ‘the importance of information that reassures and empowers’ through respectful communication, emphasising the ‘why’ of preventive actions, prioritising conversations over written information and positive framing. Second, ‘normalising sensitive conversations’ by reducing silence and stigma around stillbirth, having a standard way of doing things and shifting perceptions about the difficulty of raising this topic during pregnancy. Third, ‘steps towards respectful and supportive woman-centred care’ influence the efficacy and responsiveness of conversations through continuity of care and carer for trust-building and an ethos of addressing what matters most to women.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Integrating conversations about stillbirth into routine antenatal care is facilitated by the SBB. Key considerations for effective, woman-centred conversations about stillbirth include multidisciplinary collaboration, targeted HCP training and co-designed resources to promote open communication, reducing fragmentation of c","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 12","pages":"1856-1865"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18330","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144849559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Is the Economic Cost of FGR FGR的经济成本是什么?
IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-12 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.18327
Andrew Sharp

Linked article: This is a mini commentary on Bray et al., pp. 61–70 in this issue. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.18266.

链接文章:这是一篇关于Bray等人的迷你评论,第61-70页。要查看本文,请访问https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.18266。
{"title":"What Is the Economic Cost of FGR","authors":"Andrew Sharp","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18327","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1471-0528.18327","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Linked article:</b> This is a mini commentary on Bray et al., pp. 61–70 in this issue. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.18266.</p>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"133 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144825225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The UK Maternity Crisis: Analysing the Underlying Causes to Find Solutions 英国产妇危机:分析潜在原因寻找解决方案。
IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-12 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.18326
Andrew D. Weeks, Sarah Espenhahn, Susie Crowe

Lord Darzi, in his recent report, concludes that ‘too many women, babies and families are being let down’ by UK maternity services [1]. Complex underlying factors have put UK maternity units under significant pressure with repeated reports of poor work cultures, over-stressed staff leaving the NHS, stories of birth trauma and calls for a national maternity inquiry. Whilst maternal and perinatal outcomes are significantly better than those in the United States [2], they lag behind those in many comparator countries in Scandinavia and the rest of Europe [3]. Whilst the proportion of obstetric related negligence claims sits at around 10% of the total, the costs of maternity negligence payments are soaring and at £1.1 billion per year are over a third of the total UK maternity budget [4]. The perception might be that standards have fallen and that outcomes are worsening. But despite decreasing births rates, whole time equivalent doctors and midwives have been increasing for many years [5], and term stillbirth and neonatal mortality and morbidity rates are steadily improving [6]. Judging by the most commonly used important outcome, perinatal mortality, you could argue that the standard of care has never been better. So, why does UK maternity care appear to be in crisis?

First, there is increasing medicalisation of birth caused by multiple interrelated factors (Figure 1). Pregnant women in the UK are becoming older, increasingly overweight, have more complex medical problems—all risk factors for adverse outcomes. The increased ability of fetal medicine to detect fetal abnormalities and identify women as ‘high risk’ mean that more parents are approaching birth with anxieties about the outcome. Meanwhile, recent studies have found that induction of labour can reduce many adverse medical outcomes, not least by preventing stillbirths [7-9]. Combining this with the national ambition around maternity safety [10] and the legal requirement to inform women of all options that can reduce stillbirth [11], means that many practitioners and women feel pressurised into labour induction. The increase in induction rates (to 33% nationally [12]) has led to delays [13] and poor experience, resulting in more women opting for a caesarean birth instead. The NHS maternity staffing and estate, designed to support high numbers of ‘low risk’ births, has yet to fully adapt to the increased numbers on ‘high risk’ care pathways, further exacerbating the problem.

Second, there is a shift in who controls birth. Traditionally, providers have adopted a very medical model in which the doctor was in charge, and this remains the case in societies with marked social hierarchies or in specialisms that deal with acute specialist pathologies such as oncology or general surgery. But society has moved on. The information revolution means

从历史上看,专业人员对何种程度的产妇干预是适当的达成了普遍共识,母亲的安全在很大程度上高于婴儿的安全。这个不言而喻的原则起源于高生育率时期,在这个时期,母亲再次生育的能力被优先考虑,即使这伴随着胎儿风险的增加。然而,当把选择权交给母亲时,大多数母亲现在会优先考虑婴儿的健康,而不是自己的安全,并选择干预主义的方法。其他人有不同的优先事项,并选择超出当前循证实践的管理。指南以人口标准为基础,试图提供独立的、合乎逻辑的风险-收益分析。但在为自己做决定时,这种逻辑通常是次要的,次要的是个人考虑,比如过去的负面护理经历、个人恐惧(官方报道的生育危机加剧了这种恐惧),以及在家长式的生育制度中对控制的渴望。不出所料,总体影响是分娩途径的多样化,医疗化(剖腹产和引产)和生理分娩都在增加,甚至在双胞胎和其他复杂妊娠等非传统群体中也是如此。最后,所有上述问题都需要增加工作人员的数量,理想情况下提供持续的护理。即使在传送带式“一刀切”的分娩系统中,也需要大量的专业人员来提供高质量的护理。但是,个性化护理和知情的产妇决策增加了咨询所需的时间。进行咨询的工作人员不仅需要知道最佳做法是什么,还要知道各种替代方案的证据和风险,而且还要有时间和技能与女性一起研究这些方法。而且,考虑到诉讼的高风险,医生告诉这位女士的详细记录需要输入新的(但有时很笨拙的)电脑病历。这一切都需要大量的培训和时间,并降低了与那些更脆弱的人交谈的能力。长时间的产前预约咨询,一个口才好、有能力的怀双胞胎的妇女想要在家分娩,很容易让一个不会说英语、患有糖尿病和高血压的40岁妇女没有时间接受必要的个性化护理。平衡需要遵守临床指南以优化安全性,同时提供妇女选择的护理,当它们不相容时可能会造成相当大的压力。如果你再加上产科医生角色的隐性压力,以及对复杂动态决策的内部和外部密集的回顾性审查,那么高水平的倦怠和疾病就不足为奇了。许多工作人员报告说,他们越来越失去心理安全感。上述分析可能看起来很复杂,让个别临床医生对如何解决这个问题感到绝望。的确,有许多因素要么不会改变,要么会随着时间的推移而加剧(例如,人口结构的变化),要么应该受到欢迎(例如,权力转向妇女的选择)。尽管有这些变化,即使在一个高度压力的系统中,仍然有可能提供富有同情心的个性化护理,确保妇女感到安全,倾听和支持,以做出对她们和她们的孩子正确的选择。然而,很明显,在持续提供这种服务方面存在着系统障碍,这些障碍需要在地方和制定国家战略和政策的人加以解决。首先,当上述分析在全国范围内公布时,许多临床医生似乎松了一口气,因为他们看到了一个解释他们为什么感到如此巨大压力的框架。许多人描述了当前形势下的道德伤害;由于当前系统对每次接触的时间限制,他们无法提供他们想要的标准护理,这反过来又导致了结果的不平等。其次,有一些由代际变化引起的系统压力,应该随着新一批临床医生的培训而消除。在上个世纪或英国以外的文化中接受培训的工作人员可能对护理有非常不同的社会结构,不承认妇女选择的中心地位,或者不知道如何安全地实施它。这可能是咨询中产生相当大摩擦的一个原因,并可能直接或间接导致妇女在没有医疗投入的情况下分娩,或选择根本不接受护理,而不是接受她们认为是控制性或强制性的护理。除了更多的工作人员培训之外,还应该对产前保健模式进行全面的全国审查,考虑到咨询的复杂性和对专家投入的需求。这将支持更个性化、更公平的医疗服务。第三,很明显,在某些情况下,产妇管理过程没有为报告复合伤害的家庭提供富有同情心的护理。 他们也没有创造一种文化,在这种文化中,员工可以安全地提出担忧,这限制了学习和预防不安全做法的机会。以了解创伤的护理为重点,对目前的情况进行审查,将有助于创造一种支持家庭和工作人员的学习文化。诉讼和辩护方面的困难不太容易解决,但世界其他地方使用的无过错赔偿制度可能提供一个解决方案。对详细的计算机化文件的需求将继续存在,但技术的进步将使这一工作变得不那么费力,因为自动语音转录减少了打字的需要,与女性分享咨询记录改善了沟通,从而改善了知情同意。遗憾的是,上述措施可能需要很多年才能产生广泛影响。此外,如果没有资金的大幅增加和重点的转移,这些目标也不会实现。妇女主导的个性化护理和高水平的干预是昂贵的,需要在人员配置模式上做出重大改变来支持它。有了最初的想法,然后在与S.E.和S.C.讨论后发展,然后写了手稿的初稿,由S.E.和S.C.编辑,所有作者在出版前都批准了最终版本。作者声明无利益冲突。
{"title":"The UK Maternity Crisis: Analysing the Underlying Causes to Find Solutions","authors":"Andrew D. Weeks,&nbsp;Sarah Espenhahn,&nbsp;Susie Crowe","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18326","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1471-0528.18326","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lord Darzi, in his recent report, concludes that ‘too many women, babies and families are being let down’ by UK maternity services [<span>1</span>]. Complex underlying factors have put UK maternity units under significant pressure with repeated reports of poor work cultures, over-stressed staff leaving the NHS, stories of birth trauma and calls for a national maternity inquiry. Whilst maternal and perinatal outcomes are significantly better than those in the United States [<span>2</span>], they lag behind those in many comparator countries in Scandinavia and the rest of Europe [<span>3</span>]. Whilst the proportion of obstetric related negligence claims sits at around 10% of the total, the costs of maternity negligence payments are soaring and at £1.1 billion per year are over a third of the total UK maternity budget [<span>4</span>]. The perception might be that standards have fallen and that outcomes are worsening. But despite decreasing births rates, whole time equivalent doctors and midwives have been increasing for many years [<span>5</span>], and term stillbirth and neonatal mortality and morbidity rates are steadily improving [<span>6</span>]. Judging by the most commonly used important outcome, perinatal mortality, you could argue that the standard of care has never been better. So, why does UK maternity care appear to be in crisis?</p><p>First, there is increasing medicalisation of birth caused by multiple interrelated factors (Figure 1). Pregnant women in the UK are becoming older, increasingly overweight, have more complex medical problems—all risk factors for adverse outcomes. The increased ability of fetal medicine to detect fetal abnormalities and identify women as ‘high risk’ mean that more parents are approaching birth with anxieties about the outcome. Meanwhile, recent studies have found that induction of labour can reduce many adverse medical outcomes, not least by preventing stillbirths [<span>7-9</span>]. Combining this with the national ambition around maternity safety [<span>10</span>] and the legal requirement to inform women of all options that can reduce stillbirth [<span>11</span>], means that many practitioners and women feel pressurised into labour induction. The increase in induction rates (to 33% nationally [<span>12</span>]) has led to delays [<span>13</span>] and poor experience, resulting in more women opting for a caesarean birth instead. The NHS maternity staffing and estate, designed to support high numbers of ‘low risk’ births, has yet to fully adapt to the increased numbers on ‘high risk’ care pathways, further exacerbating the problem.</p><p>Second, there is a shift in who controls birth. Traditionally, providers have adopted a very medical model in which the doctor was in charge, and this remains the case in societies with marked social hierarchies or in specialisms that deal with acute specialist pathologies such as oncology or general surgery. But society has moved on. The information revolution means","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 12","pages":"1713-1715"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18326","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144825226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Scientific Abstracts from the British Maternal & Fetal Medicine Society Annual Conference 8th-9th May 2025, ICC, Belfast, UK 补充:英国母胎医学学会年会科学摘要,2025年5月8 -9日,ICC,贝尔法斯特,英国。
IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-12 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.18234
{"title":"Scientific Abstracts from the British Maternal & Fetal Medicine Society Annual Conference 8th-9th May 2025, ICC, Belfast, UK","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18234","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1471-0528.18234","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 S6","pages":"3-109"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18234","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144824868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preference for Face-to-Face Contraceptive Service Delivery Post-COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study covid -19大流行后面对面避孕服务提供的偏好:一项横断面研究
IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-11 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.18323
Sophie Patterson, Nicola Rennie, Sue Mann, Ona McCarthy, Melissa Palmer, Rebecca S. French
<div> <section> <h3> Objective</h3> <p>To measure the prevalence of, and social positions associated with, preference for solely face-to-face contraceptive service delivery among women and people assigned female at birth in post-COVID-19 pandemic England.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Design</h3> <p>Cross-sectional online study.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Setting</h3> <p>England.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Sample</h3> <p>The Reproductive Health Survey for England (RHSE) recruited women and people assigned female at birth aged 16–55 living in England using an online non-probability convenience sampling strategy from September–October 2023. The study population was limited to contraception users who answered the question of interest.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>Multivariable logistic regression identified variables independently associated with preference for face-to-face services.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3> <p>Preference for face-to-face services, derived from response to the question ‘How would you prefer to access contraceptive services?’ (face-to-face vs. telephone/video/website/combination/no preference).</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>The study population included 28 328 participants: median age was 30 (IQR:24–38), 92.5% (<i>n</i> = 26 193) reported White ethnicity, and 96% (<i>n</i> = 27 296) identified as a woman/girl. Preference for solely face-to-face services services was reported by 24.7% (<i>n</i> = 6992/28 328). In adjusted analysis, preference for face-to-face was associated with younger and older age; not having degree-level qualifications, self-reporting financial hardship, living with a disability, identifying as a woman/girl, and not being in a (cohabiting) relationship. Whilst there was a significant independent association between paid employment and preference for face-to-face services, effect direction was dependent on ethnicity.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusions</h3> <p>Although a minority of participants reported a preference for solely face-to-face services, they may represent those with the highest unmet need for contraceptive services. Maintaining
目的了解covid -19大流行后英格兰妇女和出生时被指定为女性的人对单独面对面避孕服务的偏好程度及其与社会地位的关系。设计横断面在线研究:英国生殖健康调查(RHSE)于2023年9月至10月采用在线非概率方便抽样策略,招募了16-55岁居住在英格兰的女性和被指定为女性的人。研究人群仅限于回答感兴趣问题的避孕使用者。方法多变量logistic回归识别与面对面服务偏好独立相关的变量。主要结局指标面对面服务的参考,来自对“你希望如何获得避孕服务?”(面对面vs.电话/视频/网站/组合/没有偏好)。结果研究人群包括28328名参与者:中位年龄为30岁(IQR:24-38), 92.5% (n = 26193)为白人,96% (n = 27296)为女性/女孩。24.7%的人更喜欢单独的面对面服务(n = 6992/ 28328)。在调整分析中,面对面的偏好与年龄有关;没有学位资格,自我报告经济困难,有残疾,认为自己是女人/女孩,没有(同居)关系。虽然有偿就业和面对面服务偏好之间存在显著的独立关联,但影响方向取决于种族。结论:虽然少数参与者报告了单独面对面服务的偏好,但他们可能代表了那些未满足避孕服务需求的最高群体。在日益数字化的医疗环境中,在避孕服务提供中保持选择对于促进公平、以人为本的生殖保健至关重要。
{"title":"Preference for Face-to-Face Contraceptive Service Delivery Post-COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Sophie Patterson,&nbsp;Nicola Rennie,&nbsp;Sue Mann,&nbsp;Ona McCarthy,&nbsp;Melissa Palmer,&nbsp;Rebecca S. French","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18323","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1471-0528.18323","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objective&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;To measure the prevalence of, and social positions associated with, preference for solely face-to-face contraceptive service delivery among women and people assigned female at birth in post-COVID-19 pandemic England.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Design&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Cross-sectional online study.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Setting&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;England.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Sample&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The Reproductive Health Survey for England (RHSE) recruited women and people assigned female at birth aged 16–55 living in England using an online non-probability convenience sampling strategy from September–October 2023. The study population was limited to contraception users who answered the question of interest.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Multivariable logistic regression identified variables independently associated with preference for face-to-face services.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Main Outcome Measures&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Preference for face-to-face services, derived from response to the question ‘How would you prefer to access contraceptive services?’ (face-to-face vs. telephone/video/website/combination/no preference).&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The study population included 28 328 participants: median age was 30 (IQR:24–38), 92.5% (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 26 193) reported White ethnicity, and 96% (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 27 296) identified as a woman/girl. Preference for solely face-to-face services services was reported by 24.7% (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 6992/28 328). In adjusted analysis, preference for face-to-face was associated with younger and older age; not having degree-level qualifications, self-reporting financial hardship, living with a disability, identifying as a woman/girl, and not being in a (cohabiting) relationship. Whilst there was a significant independent association between paid employment and preference for face-to-face services, effect direction was dependent on ethnicity.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Although a minority of participants reported a preference for solely face-to-face services, they may represent those with the highest unmet need for contraceptive services. Maintaining","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 13","pages":"2186-2197"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18323","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144813016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1