Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-12-18DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105382
Massimo Di Giulio
Recently, a new genetic code with 62 sense codons, coding for 21 amino acids, and only 2 termination codons has been identified in archaea. The authors argue that the appearance of this variant of the genetic code is due to the relatively recent and complete recoding of all UAG stop codons to codons encoding for pyrrolysine. I re-evaluate this discovery by presenting arguments that favour the early, i.e. ancestral, appearance of this variant of the genetic code during the origin of the genetic code itself. These arguments are capable of supporting that during the origin of the organization of the genetic code, at least two versions of the genetic code evolved in the domain of the Archaea. Thus, the genetic code would not be absolutely universal.
{"title":"The genetic code is not universal.","authors":"Massimo Di Giulio","doi":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105382","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105382","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, a new genetic code with 62 sense codons, coding for 21 amino acids, and only 2 termination codons has been identified in archaea. The authors argue that the appearance of this variant of the genetic code is due to the relatively recent and complete recoding of all UAG stop codons to codons encoding for pyrrolysine. I re-evaluate this discovery by presenting arguments that favour the early, i.e. ancestral, appearance of this variant of the genetic code during the origin of the genetic code itself. These arguments are capable of supporting that during the origin of the organization of the genetic code, at least two versions of the genetic code evolved in the domain of the Archaea. Thus, the genetic code would not be absolutely universal.</p>","PeriodicalId":50730,"journal":{"name":"Biosystems","volume":" ","pages":"105382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142856524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-12-18DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105383
A V Melkikh
{"title":"The problem of evolutionary directionality 50 years following the works of Sergei Meyen.","authors":"A V Melkikh","doi":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105383","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105383","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50730,"journal":{"name":"Biosystems","volume":" ","pages":"105383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142873369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-12-20DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105378
David Lynn Abel
Any homeostatic protometabolism would have required orchestration of disparate biochemical pathways into integrated circuits. Extraordinarily specific molecular assemblies were also required at the right time and place. Assembly Theory conflated with its cousins-Complexity Theory, Chaos theory, Quantum Mechanics, Irreversible Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics and Molecular Evolution theory- collectively have great naturalistic appeal in hopes of their providing the needed exquisite steering and controls. They collectively offer the best hope of circumventing the need for active selection required to formally orchestrate bona fide formal organization (as opposed to the mere self-ordering of chaos theory) (Abel and Trevors, 2006b). This paper focuses specifically on AT's contribution to naturalistic life-origin models.
{"title":"\"Assembly Theory\" in life-origin models: A critical review.","authors":"David Lynn Abel","doi":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105378","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105378","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Any homeostatic protometabolism would have required orchestration of disparate biochemical pathways into integrated circuits. Extraordinarily specific molecular assemblies were also required at the right time and place. Assembly Theory conflated with its cousins-Complexity Theory, Chaos theory, Quantum Mechanics, Irreversible Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics and Molecular Evolution theory- collectively have great naturalistic appeal in hopes of their providing the needed exquisite steering and controls. They collectively offer the best hope of circumventing the need for active selection required to formally orchestrate bona fide formal organization (as opposed to the mere self-ordering of chaos theory) (Abel and Trevors, 2006b). This paper focuses specifically on AT's contribution to naturalistic life-origin models.</p>","PeriodicalId":50730,"journal":{"name":"Biosystems","volume":" ","pages":"105378"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142878459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105386
Dan C Baciu
This article revisits Artificial Neural Networks (NNs) through the lens of Evolutionary Dynamics. The two most important features of NNs are shown to reflect the two most general processes of Evolutionary Dynamics. This overlap may serve as a new and powerful connection between NNs and Evolutionary Dynamics, which encompasses a body of knowledge that has been built over multiple centuries and has been expanded to inspire applications across a vast range of disciplines. Consequently, NNs should also be applicable across the same range of disciplines-that is, much more broadly than initially envisioned. The article concludes by opening questions about NN dynamics, based on the new connection to Evolutionary Dynamics.
{"title":"Neural networks through the lens of evolutionary dynamics.","authors":"Dan C Baciu","doi":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105386","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105386","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article revisits Artificial Neural Networks (NNs) through the lens of Evolutionary Dynamics. The two most important features of NNs are shown to reflect the two most general processes of Evolutionary Dynamics. This overlap may serve as a new and powerful connection between NNs and Evolutionary Dynamics, which encompasses a body of knowledge that has been built over multiple centuries and has been expanded to inspire applications across a vast range of disciplines. Consequently, NNs should also be applicable across the same range of disciplines-that is, much more broadly than initially envisioned. The article concludes by opening questions about NN dynamics, based on the new connection to Evolutionary Dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":50730,"journal":{"name":"Biosystems","volume":" ","pages":"105386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142928752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-12-17DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105381
Thomas Lissek
Cancers during oncogenic progression hold information in epigenetic memory which allows flexible encoding of malignant phenotypes and more rapid reaction to the environment when compared to purely mutation-based clonal evolution mechanisms. Cancer memory describes a proposed mechanism by which complex information such as metastasis phenotypes, therapy resistance and interaction patterns with the tumor environment might be encoded at multiple levels via mechanisms used in memory formation in the brain and immune system (e.g. single-cell epigenetic changes and distributed state modifications in cellular ensembles). Carcinogenesis might hence be the result of physiological multi-level learning mechanisms unleashed by defined heritable oncogenic changes which lead to tumor-specific loss of goal state integration into the whole organism. The formation of cancer memories would create and bind new levels of individuality within the host organism into the entity we call cancer. Translational implications of cancer memory are that cancers could be engaged at higher organizational levels (e.g. be "trained" for memory extinction) and that compounds that are known to interfere with memory processes could be investigated for their potential to block cancer memory formation or recall. It also suggests that diagnostic measures should extend beyond sequencing approaches to functional diagnosis of cancer physiology.
{"title":"Cancer memory as a mechanism to establish malignancy.","authors":"Thomas Lissek","doi":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105381","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105381","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancers during oncogenic progression hold information in epigenetic memory which allows flexible encoding of malignant phenotypes and more rapid reaction to the environment when compared to purely mutation-based clonal evolution mechanisms. Cancer memory describes a proposed mechanism by which complex information such as metastasis phenotypes, therapy resistance and interaction patterns with the tumor environment might be encoded at multiple levels via mechanisms used in memory formation in the brain and immune system (e.g. single-cell epigenetic changes and distributed state modifications in cellular ensembles). Carcinogenesis might hence be the result of physiological multi-level learning mechanisms unleashed by defined heritable oncogenic changes which lead to tumor-specific loss of goal state integration into the whole organism. The formation of cancer memories would create and bind new levels of individuality within the host organism into the entity we call cancer. Translational implications of cancer memory are that cancers could be engaged at higher organizational levels (e.g. be \"trained\" for memory extinction) and that compounds that are known to interfere with memory processes could be investigated for their potential to block cancer memory formation or recall. It also suggests that diagnostic measures should extend beyond sequencing approaches to functional diagnosis of cancer physiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":50730,"journal":{"name":"Biosystems","volume":" ","pages":"105381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142865877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-31DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105389
Nikolai S Rozov
This article presents a refinement of theoretical explanations of the main stages of linguistic and cognitive evolution in anthropogenesis. The concepts of language, consciousness, self-consciousness, the self, the unconscious, the subconscious, and the relation between free will and determinism remain at the center of active and complex debates in philosophy and neuroscience. A basic theoretical apparatus comprising the central concepts of "concern" and "providing structure" (an extension of the biological concept of "adaptation") develops the paradigm of the extended evolutionary synthesis. Challenge-threats and challenge-opportunities are invariably associated with concerns pertaining to sustenance, safety, sexuality, parenthood, status, and emotional support. The consolidation of successful behavioral tries (tries), in response to these challenges occurs through the formation of a variety of providing structures including practices, abilities, and attitudes. These structures are formed through mechanisms of interactive rituals and internalization. These novel practices facilitate the transformation of both techno-natural environmental niches and group niches. The emergence of new structures gives rise to new challenges and concerns, which in turn necessitate undertaking of new tries. In the context of African multiregionalism, hominin groups and populations that experienced favorable periods of demographic growth, active migration, genetic, technological, and skill exchange also underwent significant demographic disasters. During the most unfavorable bottleneck periods only the most advanced groups, populations and species survived. The achieved potential for these abilities was consolidated as complexes of innate assignments in gene pools through the Baldwin effect and the multilevel selection. This logic provides an explanation for the main stages of language and speech complication (from holophrases and articulation to complex syntax), as well as the emergence of new abilities of consciousness (from the expansion of attention field to self-consciousness and the "I"-structure).
{"title":"Stages and causes of the evolution of language and consciousness: A theoretical reconstruction.","authors":"Nikolai S Rozov","doi":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105389","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105389","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article presents a refinement of theoretical explanations of the main stages of linguistic and cognitive evolution in anthropogenesis. The concepts of language, consciousness, self-consciousness, the self, the unconscious, the subconscious, and the relation between free will and determinism remain at the center of active and complex debates in philosophy and neuroscience. A basic theoretical apparatus comprising the central concepts of \"concern\" and \"providing structure\" (an extension of the biological concept of \"adaptation\") develops the paradigm of the extended evolutionary synthesis. Challenge-threats and challenge-opportunities are invariably associated with concerns pertaining to sustenance, safety, sexuality, parenthood, status, and emotional support. The consolidation of successful behavioral tries (tries), in response to these challenges occurs through the formation of a variety of providing structures including practices, abilities, and attitudes. These structures are formed through mechanisms of interactive rituals and internalization. These novel practices facilitate the transformation of both techno-natural environmental niches and group niches. The emergence of new structures gives rise to new challenges and concerns, which in turn necessitate undertaking of new tries. In the context of African multiregionalism, hominin groups and populations that experienced favorable periods of demographic growth, active migration, genetic, technological, and skill exchange also underwent significant demographic disasters. During the most unfavorable bottleneck periods only the most advanced groups, populations and species survived. The achieved potential for these abilities was consolidated as complexes of innate assignments in gene pools through the Baldwin effect and the multilevel selection. This logic provides an explanation for the main stages of language and speech complication (from holophrases and articulation to complex syntax), as well as the emergence of new abilities of consciousness (from the expansion of attention field to self-consciousness and the \"I\"-structure).</p>","PeriodicalId":50730,"journal":{"name":"Biosystems","volume":" ","pages":"105389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142923801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-24DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105385
F Clarelli, P O Ankomah, H Weiss, J M Conway, G Forsdahl, P Abel Zur Wiesch
Antimicrobial resistance is one of the most significant healthcare challenges of our times. Multidrug or combination therapies are sometimes required to treat severe infections; for example, the current protocols to treat pulmonary tuberculosis combine several antibiotics. However, combination therapy is usually based on lengthy empirical trials, and it is difficult to predict its efficacy. We propose a new tool to identify antibiotic synergy or antagonism and optimize combination therapies. Our model explicitly incorporates the mechanisms of individual drug action and estimates their combined effect using a mechanistic approach. By quantifying the impact on growth and death of a bacterial population, we can identify optimal combinations of multiple drugs. Our approach also allows for the investigation of the drugs' actions and the testing of theoretical hypotheses. We demonstrate the utility of this tool with in vitro Escherichia coli data using a combination of ampicillin and ciprofloxacin. In contrast to previous interpretations, our model finds a slight synergy between the antibiotics. Our mechanistic model allows investigating possible causes of the synergy.
{"title":"A mechanistic approach to optimize combination antibiotic therapy.","authors":"F Clarelli, P O Ankomah, H Weiss, J M Conway, G Forsdahl, P Abel Zur Wiesch","doi":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105385","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105385","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobial resistance is one of the most significant healthcare challenges of our times. Multidrug or combination therapies are sometimes required to treat severe infections; for example, the current protocols to treat pulmonary tuberculosis combine several antibiotics. However, combination therapy is usually based on lengthy empirical trials, and it is difficult to predict its efficacy. We propose a new tool to identify antibiotic synergy or antagonism and optimize combination therapies. Our model explicitly incorporates the mechanisms of individual drug action and estimates their combined effect using a mechanistic approach. By quantifying the impact on growth and death of a bacterial population, we can identify optimal combinations of multiple drugs. Our approach also allows for the investigation of the drugs' actions and the testing of theoretical hypotheses. We demonstrate the utility of this tool with in vitro Escherichia coli data using a combination of ampicillin and ciprofloxacin. In contrast to previous interpretations, our model finds a slight synergy between the antibiotics. Our mechanistic model allows investigating possible causes of the synergy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50730,"journal":{"name":"Biosystems","volume":" ","pages":"105385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142900071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105333
Stuart Kauffman , Sudip Patra
{"title":"Corrigendum to “Cosmos, mind, matter: Is mind in spacetime?” [Biosyst. (2024) 105262]","authors":"Stuart Kauffman , Sudip Patra","doi":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105333","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105333","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50730,"journal":{"name":"Biosystems","volume":"246 ","pages":"Article 105333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142747041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105332
Stuart Kauffman , Sudip Patra
We attempt in this article to formulate a conceptual and testable framework weaving Cosmos, Mind and Matter into a whole. We build on three recent discoveries, each requiring more evidence: i. The particles of the Standard Model, SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1), are formally capable of collective autocatalysis. This leads us to ask what roles such autocatalysis may have played in Cosmogenesis, and in trying to answer, Why our Laws? Why our Constants? A capacity of the particles of SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1) for collective autocatalysis may be open to experimental test, stunning if confirmed. ii. Reasonable evidence now suggests that matter can expand spacetime. The first issue is to establish this claim at or beyond 5 sigma if that can be done. If true, this process may elucidate Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Inflation and require alteration of Einstein's Field Equations. Cosmology would be transformed. iii. Evidence at 6.49 Sigma suggests that mind can alter the outcome of the two-slit experiment. If widely and independently verified, the foundations of quantum mechanics must be altered. Mind plays a role in the universe. That role may include Cosmic Mind.
{"title":"Cosmos, mind, matter: Is mind in spacetime?","authors":"Stuart Kauffman , Sudip Patra","doi":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105332","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105332","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We attempt in this article to formulate a conceptual and testable framework weaving Cosmos, Mind and Matter into a whole. We build on three recent discoveries, each requiring more evidence: i. The particles of the Standard Model, SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1), are formally capable of collective autocatalysis. This leads us to ask what roles such autocatalysis may have played in Cosmogenesis, and in trying to answer, Why our Laws? Why our Constants? A capacity of the particles of SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1) for collective autocatalysis may be open to experimental test, stunning if confirmed. ii. Reasonable evidence now suggests that matter can expand spacetime. The first issue is to establish this claim at or beyond 5 sigma if that can be done. If true, this process may elucidate Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Inflation and require alteration of Einstein's Field Equations. Cosmology would be transformed. iii. Evidence at 6.49 Sigma suggests that mind can alter the outcome of the two-slit experiment. If widely and independently verified, the foundations of quantum mechanics must be altered. Mind plays a role in the universe. That role may include Cosmic Mind.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50730,"journal":{"name":"Biosystems","volume":"246 ","pages":"Article 105332"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142309003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-22DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105376
Thomas W. Grunt
Biophysical, developmental and systems-biology considerations enable deeper understanding why cancer is life threatening despite intensive research. Here we use two metaphors. Both conceive the cell genome and the encoded molecular system as an interacting gene regulatory network (GRN). According to Waddington's epigenetic (quasi-potential)-landscape, an instrumental tool in ontogenetics, individual interaction patterns ( = expression profiles) within this GRN represent possible cell states with different stabilities. Network interactions with low stability are represented on peaks. Unstable interactions strive towards regions with higher stability located at lower altitude in valleys termed attractors that correspond to stable cell phenotypes. Cancer cells are seen as GRNs adopting aberrant semi-stable attractor states (cancer attractor). In the second metaphor, Wright's phylogenetic fitness (adaptive) landscape, each genome ( = GRN) is assigned a specific position in the landscape according to its structure and reproductive fitness in the specific environment. High elevation signifies high fitness and low altitude low fitness. Selection ensures that mutant GRNs evolve and move from valleys to peaks. The genetic flexibility is highlighted in the fitness landscape, while non-genetic flexibility is captured in the quasi-potential landscape. These models resolve several inconsistencies that have puzzled cancer researchers, such as the fact that phenotypes generated by non-genetic mechanisms coexist in a single tumor with phenotypes caused by mutations and they mitigate conflicts between cancer theories that claim cancer is caused by mutation (somatic mutation theory) or by disruption of tissue architecture (tissue organization field theory). Nevertheless, spontaneous mutations play key roles in cancer. Remarkable, fundamental natural laws such as the second law of thermodynamics and quantum mechanics state that mutations are inevitable events. The good side of this is that without mutational variability in DNA, evolutionary development would not have occurred, but its bad side is that the occurrence of cancer is essentially inevitable. In summary, both landscapes together fully describe the behavior of cancer under normal and stressful conditions such as chemotherapy. Thus, the landscapes-attractor model fully describes cancer cell behavior and offers new perspectives for future treatment.
从生物物理、发展和系统生物学的角度来考虑问题,可以更深入地理解为什么尽管进行了深入的研究,癌症仍然威胁着人们的生命。在此,我们使用两个比喻。两者都将细胞基因组和编码分子系统视为相互作用的基因调控网络(GRN)。根据瓦丁顿(Waddington)的表观遗传学(准潜在)景观(本体遗传学的一种工具),这个基因调控网络中的单个相互作用模式(=表达档案)代表了具有不同稳定性的可能细胞状态。低稳定性的网络互动表现为峰值。不稳定的交互作用则向位于低谷的较高稳定性区域发展,这些区域被称为吸引子,对应于稳定的细胞表型。癌细胞被视为采用异常半稳定吸引子状态的 GRN(癌症吸引子)。在第二个比喻中,即赖特的系统发育适应性(适应性)景观中,每个基因组(=GRN)根据其结构和在特定环境中的繁殖适应性,被分配到景观中的特定位置。高海拔代表高适应性,低海拔代表低适应性。选择确保突变的 GRN 从低谷进化到高峰。遗传灵活性在适应性景观中得到强调,而非遗传灵活性则在准潜力景观中得到体现。这些模型解决了令癌症研究人员困惑的几个不一致之处,例如非遗传机制产生的表型与突变导致的表型共存于一个肿瘤中,它们还缓解了声称癌症是由突变(体细胞突变理论)或组织结构破坏(组织-组织-场理论)导致的癌症理论之间的冲突。然而,自发突变在癌症中起着关键作用。热力学第二定律和量子力学等显著的基本自然规律表明,突变是不可避免的事件。好的一面是,如果没有 DNA 变异,进化发展就不会发生;坏的一面是,癌症的发生基本上是不可避免的。总之,这两种景观共同充分描述了癌症在正常和化疗等压力条件下的行为。因此,"地貌-吸引子-模型 "完全描述了癌细胞的行为,并为未来的治疗提供了新的视角。
{"title":"Understanding cancer from a biophysical, developmental and systems biology perspective using the landscapes-attractor model","authors":"Thomas W. Grunt","doi":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105376","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105376","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biophysical, developmental and systems-biology considerations enable deeper understanding why cancer is life threatening despite intensive research. Here we use two metaphors. Both conceive the cell genome and the encoded molecular system as an interacting gene regulatory network (GRN). According to Waddington's epigenetic (quasi-potential)-landscape, an instrumental tool in ontogenetics, individual interaction patterns ( = expression profiles) within this GRN represent possible cell states with different stabilities. Network interactions with low stability are represented on peaks. Unstable interactions strive towards regions with higher stability located at lower altitude in valleys termed attractors that correspond to stable cell phenotypes. Cancer cells are seen as GRNs adopting aberrant semi-stable attractor states (cancer attractor). In the second metaphor, Wright's phylogenetic fitness (adaptive) landscape, each genome ( = GRN) is assigned a specific position in the landscape according to its structure and reproductive fitness in the specific environment. High elevation signifies high fitness and low altitude low fitness. Selection ensures that mutant GRNs evolve and move from valleys to peaks. The genetic flexibility is highlighted in the fitness landscape, while non-genetic flexibility is captured in the quasi-potential landscape. These models resolve several inconsistencies that have puzzled cancer researchers, such as the fact that phenotypes generated by non-genetic mechanisms coexist in a single tumor with phenotypes caused by mutations and they mitigate conflicts between cancer theories that claim cancer is caused by mutation (somatic mutation theory) or by disruption of tissue architecture (tissue organization field theory). Nevertheless, spontaneous mutations play key roles in cancer. Remarkable, fundamental natural laws such as the second law of thermodynamics and quantum mechanics state that mutations are inevitable events. The good side of this is that without mutational variability in DNA, evolutionary development would not have occurred, but its bad side is that the occurrence of cancer is essentially inevitable. In summary, both landscapes together fully describe the behavior of cancer under normal and stressful conditions such as chemotherapy. Thus, the landscapes-attractor model fully describes cancer cell behavior and offers new perspectives for future treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50730,"journal":{"name":"Biosystems","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 105376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142711773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}