Pub Date : 2024-03-27DOI: 10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.12
Vadim M. Maslov
The work is devoted to understanding the process of political involvement of modern science and the need for the post-non-classical scientific community to become a subject of political activity. In historical terms, we are talking about the actualization of F. Bacon’s ideas about the beneficial connection of a new science with power. Philosophical education can serve as a basis for the formation of appropriate political competencies among future scientists and engineers.
这部著作致力于理解现代科学的政治参与过程，以及后非古典科学界成为政治活动主体的必要性。从历史的角度来看，我们谈论的是 F. 培根关于新科学与权力的有益联系的思想的现实化。哲学教育可以作为未来科学家和工程师形成适当政治能力的基础。
{"title":"The problem of the political component of post-non-classical science and education","authors":"Vadim M. Maslov","doi":"10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.12","url":null,"abstract":"The work is devoted to understanding the process of political involvement of modern science and the need for the post-non-classical scientific community to become a subject of political activity. In historical terms, we are talking about the actualization of F. Bacon’s ideas about the beneficial connection of a new science with power. Philosophical education can serve as a basis for the formation of appropriate political competencies among future scientists and engineers.","PeriodicalId":507508,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Samara State Technical University. Series Philosophy","volume":"39 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140376953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-27DOI: 10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.8
Nadezhda V. Gonotskaya
Modernity provides us with a large number of technologies for self-identification. We meet them both in pseudoscientific discourse (for example: in astrology — natal charts, horoscopes), and scientific, in the field of psychology (classification of personalities by V. Stern, K.G. Jung, A.F. Lazursky, etc.). These technologies for self-identification, personality models are often misunderstood, being identified with the process of self-consciousness. The result of such identification is relativization of the image of the “I”, combination of various situational functions, social roles, character traits in the “I”. The author problematizes such an approach, in which the “I” is substatized, endowed with qualities, just as a thing is endowed with them; separates the concepts of “self-identification” and “self-consciousness”; raises questions related to the possibility of maintaining the continual unity of the “I”, with building the process of constituting the “I” through time. Unlike the procedure of self-identification, which can be modeled, self-consciousness cannot fit into patterns. Self-consciousness is plastic, changeable, rooted in time, but it always belongs to the same “I”.
{"title":"\"I\" within measure","authors":"Nadezhda V. Gonotskaya","doi":"10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.8","url":null,"abstract":"Modernity provides us with a large number of technologies for self-identification. We meet them both in pseudoscientific discourse (for example: in astrology — natal charts, horoscopes), and scientific, in the field of psychology (classification of personalities by V. Stern, K.G. Jung, A.F. Lazursky, etc.). These technologies for self-identification, personality models are often misunderstood, being identified with the process of self-consciousness. The result of such identification is relativization of the image of the “I”, combination of various situational functions, social roles, character traits in the “I”. The author problematizes such an approach, in which the “I” is substatized, endowed with qualities, just as a thing is endowed with them; separates the concepts of “self-identification” and “self-consciousness”; raises questions related to the possibility of maintaining the continual unity of the “I”, with building the process of constituting the “I” through time. Unlike the procedure of self-identification, which can be modeled, self-consciousness cannot fit into patterns. Self-consciousness is plastic, changeable, rooted in time, but it always belongs to the same “I”.","PeriodicalId":507508,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Samara State Technical University. Series Philosophy","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140374827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-27DOI: 10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.6
I. M. Ratnikova
The paper is devoted to identifying the specifics of civilizational dynamics of modernity through the theoretical reconstruction of Critical Theory, the key subject of which is the fundamental principles of Technogenic civilization. Based on the conceptual resources of the newest version of this research program, the ambivalence of the axiological foundations of Western culture and its foundation on the logic of domination-subordination is revealed on the example of the discourse and practice of tolerance. The heuristic potential of Critical Theory in the context of overcoming pathologies of modern civilization development is explicated in the article.
{"title":"The ambivalence of technogenic civilization’s axiological foundations","authors":"I. M. Ratnikova","doi":"10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.6","url":null,"abstract":"The paper is devoted to identifying the specifics of civilizational dynamics of modernity through the theoretical reconstruction of Critical Theory, the key subject of which is the fundamental principles of Technogenic civilization. Based on the conceptual resources of the newest version of this research program, the ambivalence of the axiological foundations of Western culture and its foundation on the logic of domination-subordination is revealed on the example of the discourse and practice of tolerance. The heuristic potential of Critical Theory in the context of overcoming pathologies of modern civilization development is explicated in the article.","PeriodicalId":507508,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Samara State Technical University. Series Philosophy","volume":"52 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140376602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-27DOI: 10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.7
N. Balakleets
The article, based on the mimetic model of military activity, examines the problem of the escalation of armed violence. The author identifies constructive mimesis, aimed at strengthening of social solidarity, and destructive mimesis, which can be regarded as a source of escalation of violence. For the classic of military theory Carl von Clausewitz the limit of violence acts as a speculative figure, but in the nuclear era the absolute maximum of violence received clear empirical contours. The article analyzes escalation ladders, the final step of which is the large-scale war using nuclear weapons. It is concluded that modern reflection on armed violence includes the phenomenon of the limit as its integral horizon; it is further connected with the search for tools for self-limitation of military activity.
文章以军事活动的拟态模式为基础，探讨了武装暴力升级的问题。作者指出了旨在加强社会团结的建设性拟态和可被视为暴力升级根源的破坏性拟态。对于军事理论经典卡尔-冯-克劳塞维茨（Carl von Clausewitz）来说，暴力的极限只是一个推测的数字，但在核时代，暴力的绝对最大值得到了明确的经验轮廓。文章分析了暴力升级的阶梯，其最后一步是使用核武器的大规模战争。文章的结论是，对武装暴力的现代反思将极限现象作为其整体视野；它还与寻找自我限制军事活动的工具有关。
{"title":"Escalation of armed violence: the problem of the limit","authors":"N. Balakleets","doi":"10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.7","url":null,"abstract":"The article, based on the mimetic model of military activity, examines the problem of the escalation of armed violence. The author identifies constructive mimesis, aimed at strengthening of social solidarity, and destructive mimesis, which can be regarded as a source of escalation of violence. For the classic of military theory Carl von Clausewitz the limit of violence acts as a speculative figure, but in the nuclear era the absolute maximum of violence received clear empirical contours. The article analyzes escalation ladders, the final step of which is the large-scale war using nuclear weapons. It is concluded that modern reflection on armed violence includes the phenomenon of the limit as its integral horizon; it is further connected with the search for tools for self-limitation of military activity.","PeriodicalId":507508,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Samara State Technical University. Series Philosophy","volume":"20 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140374370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-27DOI: 10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.19
V. Faritov
The review is devoted to the recently published textbook of Andrei Mikhailovich Orekhov, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor of the Department of Social Philosophy of the Russian University of Friendship of Peoples, «History, Philosophy and Methodology of Social and Humanitarian Sciences» of A.M. Orekhov».
{"title":"The Review of the monograph by A.M. Orekhov «History, philosophy and methodology of social and humanities»","authors":"V. Faritov","doi":"10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.19","url":null,"abstract":"The review is devoted to the recently published textbook of Andrei Mikhailovich Orekhov, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor of the Department of Social Philosophy of the Russian University of Friendship of Peoples, «History, Philosophy and Methodology of Social and Humanitarian Sciences» of A.M. Orekhov».","PeriodicalId":507508,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Samara State Technical University. Series Philosophy","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140374442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-27DOI: 10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.18
E. Tyugashev
The article gives an axiological characteristic of the world-building cultural tradition as one of the main traditions that determine the civilizational development of Russia. The main values of this tradition are autocracy, mutual veneration, liveliness, renovation, cunning.
{"title":"Values of the world-building cultural tradition","authors":"E. Tyugashev","doi":"10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.18","url":null,"abstract":"The article gives an axiological characteristic of the world-building cultural tradition as one of the main traditions that determine the civilizational development of Russia. The main values of this tradition are autocracy, mutual veneration, liveliness, renovation, cunning.","PeriodicalId":507508,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Samara State Technical University. Series Philosophy","volume":"41 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140376779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-27DOI: 10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.9
O. A. Belkov
The article analyzes the phenomenon of war. Four orders of its essence stand out: socio-political phenomenon, continuation of politics, armed struggle, support by non-military means. Based on the classical work of K. Clausewitz and the Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation, eight invariant (unchanged and mandatory) signs of war are formulated. It is indicated that recently an alternative interpretation of war has become increasingly widespread, in which armed struggle is not its obligatory attribute. Its main premises, their theoretical failure and practically political counterproductiveness are revealed.
{"title":"War as a phenomenon and concept","authors":"O. A. Belkov","doi":"10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.9","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the phenomenon of war. Four orders of its essence stand out: socio-political phenomenon, continuation of politics, armed struggle, support by non-military means. Based on the classical work of K. Clausewitz and the Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation, eight invariant (unchanged and mandatory) signs of war are formulated. It is indicated that recently an alternative interpretation of war has become increasingly widespread, in which armed struggle is not its obligatory attribute. Its main premises, their theoretical failure and practically political counterproductiveness are revealed.","PeriodicalId":507508,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Samara State Technical University. Series Philosophy","volume":"28 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140373688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-27DOI: 10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.10
Anastasia V. Agapitova
The paper comments on the theory of post-non-classical systems from the position of geterology about religious search and finding God or absolute in conditions of post-non-classical view on a social world. At the end of an article is presenting a conclusion about the way of answer on the question by the volitional collective stop of the dynamics of social interactions.
{"title":"Limit location in post-classical systems","authors":"Anastasia V. Agapitova","doi":"10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.10","url":null,"abstract":"The paper comments on the theory of post-non-classical systems from the position of geterology about religious search and finding God or absolute in conditions of post-non-classical view on a social world. At the end of an article is presenting a conclusion about the way of answer on the question by the volitional collective stop of the dynamics of social interactions.","PeriodicalId":507508,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Samara State Technical University. Series Philosophy","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140375612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-27DOI: 10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.4
Kirill V. Sevastov Sevastov
The article analyzes the phenomenon of identity, as well as the process of its formation, based on the initial intra-subjective stage of distinction. The typologization of identification components is described, based on the concept of the totality of sub-identities of the individual’s personality. The idea of the cyclic nature of the process of subjective identification is proposed.
{"title":"The process of formation and socio-cultural determination of identity in contemporary culture","authors":"Kirill V. Sevastov Sevastov","doi":"10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2024.1.4","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the phenomenon of identity, as well as the process of its formation, based on the initial intra-subjective stage of distinction. The typologization of identification components is described, based on the concept of the totality of sub-identities of the individual’s personality. The idea of the cyclic nature of the process of subjective identification is proposed.","PeriodicalId":507508,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Samara State Technical University. Series Philosophy","volume":"61 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140376639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-12DOI: 10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2023.4.11
Emilia A. Taysina
The classical toolkit of philosophy includes, as a necessary basic “set”, certain general concepts, extremely abstract and deeply essential, which are called in Greek categories, and in Latin predicabiles, but more often — universals. Initially, Aristotle introduces the first ten such categories into his texts that further became canonic, in a small but very complex work of the same name. Up to the era of Modernity, his methodological arsenal served European philosophy with unfailing success. However, in the XVIII century, Immanuel Kant, sharply and definitely distinguishing rationality and reason unlike Aristotle, introduces the categories of logic not as abstractions, but as propositions systematically developed from a general principle: the ability, or faculty, of judgment. These approaches are very different: for example, in relation to concepts, — and Aristotle’s categories are precisely concepts, — the question of truth does not arise at all: it concerns only judgments. On the other hand, these approaches have something in common. Both philosophical systems in the field of gnoseology are formal-logical. Kant’s approach, dialectical in the study and explanation of the objective world, in terms of the theory of knowledge was not yet dialectical; or, it is believed rather, that this was negative-dialectical. In fact, this approach is intermediate, syntagmatic.
{"title":"Methodological arsenal of Aristotle and Kant. Categories","authors":"Emilia A. Taysina","doi":"10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2023.4.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2023.4.11","url":null,"abstract":"The classical toolkit of philosophy includes, as a necessary basic “set”, certain general concepts, extremely abstract and deeply essential, which are called in Greek categories, and in Latin predicabiles, but more often — universals. Initially, Aristotle introduces the first ten such categories into his texts that further became canonic, in a small but very complex work of the same name. Up to the era of Modernity, his methodological arsenal served European philosophy with unfailing success. However, in the XVIII century, Immanuel Kant, sharply and definitely distinguishing rationality and reason unlike Aristotle, introduces the categories of logic not as abstractions, but as propositions systematically developed from a general principle: the ability, or faculty, of judgment. These approaches are very different: for example, in relation to concepts, — and Aristotle’s categories are precisely concepts, — the question of truth does not arise at all: it concerns only judgments. On the other hand, these approaches have something in common. Both philosophical systems in the field of gnoseology are formal-logical. Kant’s approach, dialectical in the study and explanation of the objective world, in terms of the theory of knowledge was not yet dialectical; or, it is believed rather, that this was negative-dialectical. In fact, this approach is intermediate, syntagmatic.","PeriodicalId":507508,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Samara State Technical University. Series Philosophy","volume":"74 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139182586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：