Introduction: Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) warning label and excise tax policies hold promise for preventing type 2 diabetes. Population-level impacts of SSB policies have been projected using simulation models, but the authors are unaware of any assessing the effect of warning labels on type 2 diabetes (T2D), or the effects of warning label and tax effects using the same modeling assumptions. Simulation models have also rarely considered how policy implementation factors such as design and sustainment affect policy outcomes.
Methods: Microsimulation model of T2D development in a closed cohort of US adults aged 18-64 over 10 years with 1200 replications. The model was developed using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017-18, US Diabetes Surveillance System, and published literature. Policy implementation scenarios were modeled in 2025 for warning label (design: graphic or text warning label) and tax (sustainment: $0.02/fluid ounce excise tax sustained or repealed) policies, compared to the status quo.
Results: Relative to the status quo, a graphic warning label was estimated to avert 945,000 cases of T2D over 10 years (95% UI=442,000, 1,820,000) as compared to 480,000 (147,000, 1,140,000) cases averted under a text warning label. A $0.02/fluid ounce excise tax was estimated to avert 1,260,000 (646,000, 2,160,000) cases of T2D over 10 years. If repealed after 1 year, the policy would only avert 78,000 (0, 469,000) cases of T2D.
Conclusions: SSB policies may be an approach to meaningfully decrease the number of individuals with T2D. Policy design and sustainment drive the magnitude of effects.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
