首页 > 最新文献

American Journal of Preventive Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Hormones, Stress, and Heart Disease in Transgender Women with HIV in LITE Plus. LITE Plus 中感染艾滋病毒的变性妇女的荷尔蒙、压力和心脏病。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.10.001
Tonia C Poteat, Molly Ehrig, Hedyeh Ahmadi, Mannat Malik, Sari L Reisner, Asa E Radix, Jowanna Malone, Christopher Cannon, Carl G Streed, Mabel Toribio, Christopher Cortina, Ashleigh Rich, Kenneth H Mayer, L Zachary DuBois, Robert-Paul Juster, Andrea L Wirtz, Krista M Perreira

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death among transgender women and people with HIV. Exogenous estrogen and psychosocial stressors are known risk factors for CVD. Yet, few studies have used biomarkers to examine the role of stress in CVD risk among transgender women with HIV (TWHIV). This analysis examined whether stress moderates relationships between gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) duration and CVD risk among TWHIV.

Methods: This cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from an observational cohort of 108 Black and Latina TWHIV in Boston, New York, and Washington, DC, enrolled December 2020 to June 2022, measured sociodemographics, medical diagnoses, medications, smoking history, and perceived stress via interviewer-administered surveys. Physiological stress was measured with 14 biomarkers to calculate allostatic load indices (ALI). Forty participants provided saliva samples used to calculate cortisol awakening response and cortisol daily decline. The 2018 American College of Cardiology Revised Pooled Cohort Equation estimated 10-year CVD risk. Data were analyzed in 2024.

Results: GAHT duration was positively associated with CVD risk scores in bivariate regression. In multivariable linear regression models (adjusting for age, income, education), only age and ALI remained significantly associated with CVD risk scores (β 1.13, CI: 1.05, 1.21). No stress measure significantly interacted with GAHT duration to affect CVD risk scores. In visual plots, GAHT duration increased CVD risk scores only for TWHIV experiencing the highest ALI.

Conclusions: Stress plays an important role in CVD in TWHIV. More research is needed on non-GAHT factors, which influence CVD health among transgender women.

导言:心血管疾病(CVD)是变性女性和 HIV 感染者的主要死因。外源性雌激素和社会心理压力是心血管疾病的已知风险因素。然而,很少有研究使用生物标志物来检测压力在感染 HIV 的变性女性(TWHIV)中心血管疾病风险中的作用。这项分析研究了压力是否会调节性别确认激素疗法(GAHT)持续时间与跨性别女性艾滋病病毒感染者心血管疾病风险之间的关系:这项横断面分析是对波士顿、纽约和华盛顿特区 108 名黑人和拉丁裔 TWHIV 的基线数据进行的观察性队列分析,这些 TWHIV 于 2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 6 月入组,通过访谈者主持的调查测量了社会人口统计学、医疗诊断、药物、吸烟史和感知压力。生理压力通过 14 种生物标志物进行测量,以计算代谢负荷指数(ALI)。40 名参与者提供了唾液样本,用于计算皮质醇觉醒反应和皮质醇日下降率。2018年美国心脏病学会修订的集合队列方程估算了10年心血管疾病风险。对 2024 年的数据进行了分析:在二元回归中,GAHT持续时间与心血管疾病风险评分呈正相关。在多变量线性回归模型中(调整年龄、收入、教育程度),只有年龄和 ALI 仍与心血管疾病风险评分显著相关 [β 1.13, CI: 1.05, 1.21]。没有任何一项压力指标与 GAHT 持续时间有明显的相互作用,从而影响心血管疾病风险评分。在直观图中,GAHT持续时间仅增加了ALI最高的TWHIV的心血管疾病风险得分:结论:压力对 TWHIV 的心血管疾病有重要影响。还需要对影响变性女性心血管疾病健康的非GAHT因素进行更多研究。
{"title":"Hormones, Stress, and Heart Disease in Transgender Women with HIV in LITE Plus.","authors":"Tonia C Poteat, Molly Ehrig, Hedyeh Ahmadi, Mannat Malik, Sari L Reisner, Asa E Radix, Jowanna Malone, Christopher Cannon, Carl G Streed, Mabel Toribio, Christopher Cortina, Ashleigh Rich, Kenneth H Mayer, L Zachary DuBois, Robert-Paul Juster, Andrea L Wirtz, Krista M Perreira","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.10.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death among transgender women and people with HIV. Exogenous estrogen and psychosocial stressors are known risk factors for CVD. Yet, few studies have used biomarkers to examine the role of stress in CVD risk among transgender women with HIV (TWHIV). This analysis examined whether stress moderates relationships between gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) duration and CVD risk among TWHIV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from an observational cohort of 108 Black and Latina TWHIV in Boston, New York, and Washington, DC, enrolled December 2020 to June 2022, measured sociodemographics, medical diagnoses, medications, smoking history, and perceived stress via interviewer-administered surveys. Physiological stress was measured with 14 biomarkers to calculate allostatic load indices (ALI). Forty participants provided saliva samples used to calculate cortisol awakening response and cortisol daily decline. The 2018 American College of Cardiology Revised Pooled Cohort Equation estimated 10-year CVD risk. Data were analyzed in 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GAHT duration was positively associated with CVD risk scores in bivariate regression. In multivariable linear regression models (adjusting for age, income, education), only age and ALI remained significantly associated with CVD risk scores (β 1.13, CI: 1.05, 1.21). No stress measure significantly interacted with GAHT duration to affect CVD risk scores. In visual plots, GAHT duration increased CVD risk scores only for TWHIV experiencing the highest ALI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stress plays an important role in CVD in TWHIV. More research is needed on non-GAHT factors, which influence CVD health among transgender women.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142401872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Provider Perspectives on Contraceptive Care: A Systematic Review. 提供者对避孕护理的看法:系统回顾。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.07.025
Jamie L Manzer, Lexi Ouellette, Lauren Tingey, Amanda Carrillo-Perez, Clare Hogan, Nia Atkins, Katherine Carmichael, Grace Guerrero Ramirez, Maggie M Magee, Macy A Miller, Chidinma Nwankwo, Simone Reid, Tara Strelevitz, Vanessa Taylor, William Waddell, Mindy Wong, Burak Yuksel, Jennifer Blum

Introduction: Contraceptive care is critical piece of quality sexual reproductive healthcare. Providers directly impact client experiences and clinical outcomes; it is important to understand how providers offer contraceptive care and the factors influencing this care. This systematic review summarizes recent research on providers, their perspectives, experiences, barriers, and facilitators to offering contraceptive counseling, education, and care.

Methods: In May 2023, a systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus to identify articles published between December 1, 2016, and May 1, 2023. Studies that explored the barriers and facilitators providers experience when offering contraceptive counseling, education, and/or care and how those differ by clinic setting, provider characteristics, and/or client demographics were included.

Results: A total of 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. Only three studies reported provider demographic characteristics. Most studies were conducted in urban locations with five delivering care to clients with low income. Care provision varied based on clinic setting, provider characteristics, and client characteristics. Care also included client-centered, efficacy-based, shared decision-making, and directive counseling approaches. Providers identified real or perceived challenges among their clients as a barrier to quality care provision, in addition to insufficient time; inability to offer same-day method insertion; and a lack of training in cultural humility, long-acting methods, and providing care to clients with intellectual disabilities.

Discussion: Despite intentions to provide client-centered care and prioritize client autonomy, providers face numerous barriers that impact their ability to offer quality care in alignment with client needs and desires.

Trial registration: Prospero-CRD42023414456 crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=414456.

引言避孕护理是优质性生殖保健的重要组成部分。服务提供者直接影响客户的体验和临床结果;了解服务提供者如何提供避孕护理以及影响这种护理的因素非常重要。这篇系统性综述总结了有关提供者、他们的观点、经验、障碍以及提供避孕咨询、教育和护理的促进因素的最新研究:2023 年 5 月,我们在 PubMed、Cochrane 系统综述数据库和 Scopus 中进行了系统综述,以确定 2016 年 12 月 1 日至 2023 年 5 月 1 日期间发表的文章。纳入的研究探讨了提供者在提供避孕咨询、教育和/或护理时遇到的障碍和促进因素,以及这些障碍和因素因诊所环境、提供者特征和/或客户人口统计学特征的不同而有何差异:共有 22 项研究符合纳入标准。只有三项研究报告了提供者的人口统计学特征。大多数研究都是在城市地区进行的,其中五项研究为低收入人群提供护理服务。提供的护理服务因诊所环境、提供者特征和客户特征而异。护理还包括以客户为中心、以疗效为基础、共同决策和指导性咨询等方法。服务提供者认为,除了时间不足、无法提供当天置入方法、缺乏文化谦逊、长效方法和为智障客户提供护理方面的培训外,客户中存在的实际或感知到的挑战也是提供优质护理的障碍:讨论:尽管医疗服务提供者有意提供以客户为中心的医疗服务并优先考虑客户的自主权,但他们仍面临着许多障碍,这些障碍影响了他们提供符合客户需求和愿望的优质医疗服务的能力:Prospero-CRD42023414456 crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=414456.
{"title":"Provider Perspectives on Contraceptive Care: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Jamie L Manzer, Lexi Ouellette, Lauren Tingey, Amanda Carrillo-Perez, Clare Hogan, Nia Atkins, Katherine Carmichael, Grace Guerrero Ramirez, Maggie M Magee, Macy A Miller, Chidinma Nwankwo, Simone Reid, Tara Strelevitz, Vanessa Taylor, William Waddell, Mindy Wong, Burak Yuksel, Jennifer Blum","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.07.025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.07.025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Contraceptive care is critical piece of quality sexual reproductive healthcare. Providers directly impact client experiences and clinical outcomes; it is important to understand how providers offer contraceptive care and the factors influencing this care. This systematic review summarizes recent research on providers, their perspectives, experiences, barriers, and facilitators to offering contraceptive counseling, education, and care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In May 2023, a systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus to identify articles published between December 1, 2016, and May 1, 2023. Studies that explored the barriers and facilitators providers experience when offering contraceptive counseling, education, and/or care and how those differ by clinic setting, provider characteristics, and/or client demographics were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. Only three studies reported provider demographic characteristics. Most studies were conducted in urban locations with five delivering care to clients with low income. Care provision varied based on clinic setting, provider characteristics, and client characteristics. Care also included client-centered, efficacy-based, shared decision-making, and directive counseling approaches. Providers identified real or perceived challenges among their clients as a barrier to quality care provision, in addition to insufficient time; inability to offer same-day method insertion; and a lack of training in cultural humility, long-acting methods, and providing care to clients with intellectual disabilities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite intentions to provide client-centered care and prioritize client autonomy, providers face numerous barriers that impact their ability to offer quality care in alignment with client needs and desires.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Prospero-CRD42023414456 crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=414456.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142683303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Flavor and Device Choices Among People Who Use ENDS: Results From the PATH Study. 使用 ENDS 的人对口味和设备的选择:PATH 研究的结果。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.020
Maansi Bansal-Travers, Cheryl Rivard, Cristine D Delnevo, Amy Gross, Andrew Anesetti-Rothermel, Brittany Merson, Haijun Xiao, Yu-Ching Cheng, MeLisa R Creamer, Heather L Kimmel, Cassandra A Stanton, Eva Sharma, Kristie Taylor, Kristin Lauten, Maciej Goniewicz, Andrew Hyland

Introduction: In guidance published in February 2020, the FDA described their intent to prioritize enforcement against the sale of flavored cartridge-based Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) except tobacco and menthol flavors. This guidance was specific to cartridge-based ENDS and did not apply to other ENDS types or e-liquids sold in the U.S.. It remains unknown if use of certain types of ENDS devices and flavors changed following the publication of this guidance.

Methods: This analysis includes PATH Study data from Wave 5 (W5, 2018-2019) and Wave 6 (W6, 2021) and examines cross-sectional estimates of (1) use of flavored ENDS and (2) use of different device types. All analyses in this study were stratified by self-reported age (youth-aged 12-17 years at W5 and aged 14-17 years at W6, and adults-aged 18-20, 21-24, and 25+ years). Analyses were conducted in 2023-2024.

Results: Among adults aged 21 years and over, there were significant increases in the use of menthol or mint flavored ENDS. There were no substantial changes in flavors of ENDS used among youth or adults aged 18-20 years. Among all age groups, the use of cartridge-based ENDS was lower in 2021 than 2018-2019, with a notable shift to disposable-style ENDS.

Conclusions: Federal-level tobacco control actions taken in the U.S. in early 2020 prioritized enforcement against "any flavored, cartridge-based ENDS product (other than a tobacco- or menthol-flavored ENDS product)." Based on this analysis, there was a shift following the policy to menthol or mint-flavored ENDS and disposable-style ENDS.

导言:在 2020 年 2 月发布的指导意见中,FDA 阐述了对销售烟草和薄荷口味以外的盒装口味电子尼古丁给药系统 (ENDS) 优先执法的意图。该指南专门针对盒装ENDS,不适用于在美国销售的其他类型的ENDS或电子液体。该指南发布后,某些类型的ENDS设备和口味的使用是否发生了变化,目前仍不得而知:本分析包括第 5 波(W5,2018-2019 年)和第 6 波(W6,2021 年)的 PATH 研究数据,并检查了 1) 使用风味 ENDS 和 2) 使用不同设备类型的横截面估计值。本研究中的所有分析均按自我报告的年龄进行分层(青少年--W5 为 12-17 岁,W6 为 14-17 岁;成年人--18-20 岁、21-24 岁和 25 岁以上)。分析于 2023-2024 年进行:结果:在 21 岁及以上的成年人中,使用薄荷或薄荷味 ENDS 的人数显著增加。在 18-20 岁的青少年或成年人中,ENDS 的口味没有发生实质性变化。在所有年龄组中,2021年烟弹型ENDS的使用量低于2018-2019年,明显转向一次性型ENDS:2020 年初,美国联邦一级采取的控烟行动优先针对 "任何调味、盒装 ENDS 产品(烟草或薄荷味 ENDS 产品除外)"进行执法。根据这项分析,政策实施后,ENDS 产品已转向薄荷或薄荷味ENDS 和一次性ENDS。
{"title":"Flavor and Device Choices Among People Who Use ENDS: Results From the PATH Study.","authors":"Maansi Bansal-Travers, Cheryl Rivard, Cristine D Delnevo, Amy Gross, Andrew Anesetti-Rothermel, Brittany Merson, Haijun Xiao, Yu-Ching Cheng, MeLisa R Creamer, Heather L Kimmel, Cassandra A Stanton, Eva Sharma, Kristie Taylor, Kristin Lauten, Maciej Goniewicz, Andrew Hyland","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.020","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In guidance published in February 2020, the FDA described their intent to prioritize enforcement against the sale of flavored cartridge-based Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) except tobacco and menthol flavors. This guidance was specific to cartridge-based ENDS and did not apply to other ENDS types or e-liquids sold in the U.S.. It remains unknown if use of certain types of ENDS devices and flavors changed following the publication of this guidance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analysis includes PATH Study data from Wave 5 (W5, 2018-2019) and Wave 6 (W6, 2021) and examines cross-sectional estimates of (1) use of flavored ENDS and (2) use of different device types. All analyses in this study were stratified by self-reported age (youth-aged 12-17 years at W5 and aged 14-17 years at W6, and adults-aged 18-20, 21-24, and 25+ years). Analyses were conducted in 2023-2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among adults aged 21 years and over, there were significant increases in the use of menthol or mint flavored ENDS. There were no substantial changes in flavors of ENDS used among youth or adults aged 18-20 years. Among all age groups, the use of cartridge-based ENDS was lower in 2021 than 2018-2019, with a notable shift to disposable-style ENDS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Federal-level tobacco control actions taken in the U.S. in early 2020 prioritized enforcement against \"any flavored, cartridge-based ENDS product (other than a tobacco- or menthol-flavored ENDS product).\" Based on this analysis, there was a shift following the policy to menthol or mint-flavored ENDS and disposable-style ENDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effect of allergies on outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty: A national database analysis of 154,478 patients. 过敏对肩关节置换术后疗效的影响:对 154,478 名患者进行的国家数据库分析。
IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-10 DOI: 10.1177/17585732231194615
Akshar V Patel, Andrew Stevens, Hania Shahzad, Amogh I Iyer, Dashaun Ragland, Gregory Cvetanovich, Julie Y Bishop, Ryan C Rauck

Background: The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of allergies on complications following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).

Materials and methods: All data were collected by using the PearlDiver national database to identify patients who had undergone TSA (anatomic or reverse) between 1 January 2010 and 31 October 2021. Patients were stratified into two groups: allergies and no allergies. Comparisons were made regarding complications and revision surgeries. Complications were compared at 30 and 90 days. Revisions were compared at 1, 5 and 10 years postoperatively.

Results: This study identified 28,182 patients with allergies and 126,296 patients without allergies. Patients with allergies were more likely to require revision surgery at all time points analyzed (p < 0.001). Patients with allergies were more likely to have sepsis within 30 (OR 1.53 [1.30-1.80], p < 0.001) and 90 days (1.71 [1.51-1.94], p < 0.001) postoperatively. Patients with allergies were more likely to experience a wound complication within 30 (1.89 [1.58-2.26], p < 0.001) and 90 days (1.81 [1.58-2.08], p < 0.001). The allergy group experienced higher rates of prosthetic joint infections (PJI) (2.14 [1.81-2.54], p < 0.001) and implant complications at 90 days (1.52 [1.42-1.62], p < 0.001).

Discussion: Patients with allergies were more likely to require revision surgery, experience wound complications, sepsis and PJI following TSA.

背景:本研究旨在探讨过敏对全肩关节置换术(TSA)后并发症的影响:所有数据均通过PearlDiver国家数据库收集,以确定在2010年1月1日至2021年10月31日期间接受过TSA(解剖或反向)手术的患者。患者分为两组:过敏和无过敏。对并发症和翻修手术进行比较。并发症在 30 天和 90 天时进行比较。比较了术后 1 年、5 年和 10 年的翻修情况:这项研究发现了 28182 名过敏症患者和 126296 名非过敏症患者。在所有分析的时间点上,过敏症患者都更有可能需要进行翻修手术(P 讨论):过敏症患者更有可能在 TSA 术后需要进行翻修手术、出现伤口并发症、败血症和 PJI。
{"title":"The effect of allergies on outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty: A national database analysis of 154,478 patients.","authors":"Akshar V Patel, Andrew Stevens, Hania Shahzad, Amogh I Iyer, Dashaun Ragland, Gregory Cvetanovich, Julie Y Bishop, Ryan C Rauck","doi":"10.1177/17585732231194615","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17585732231194615","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of allergies on complications following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All data were collected by using the PearlDiver national database to identify patients who had undergone TSA (anatomic or reverse) between 1 January 2010 and 31 October 2021. Patients were stratified into two groups: allergies and no allergies. Comparisons were made regarding complications and revision surgeries. Complications were compared at 30 and 90 days. Revisions were compared at 1, 5 and 10 years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study identified 28,182 patients with allergies and 126,296 patients without allergies. Patients with allergies were more likely to require revision surgery at all time points analyzed (p < 0.001). Patients with allergies were more likely to have sepsis within 30 (OR 1.53 [1.30-1.80], p < 0.001) and 90 days (1.71 [1.51-1.94], p < 0.001) postoperatively. Patients with allergies were more likely to experience a wound complication within 30 (1.89 [1.58-2.26], p < 0.001) and 90 days (1.81 [1.58-2.08], p < 0.001). The allergy group experienced higher rates of prosthetic joint infections (PJI) (2.14 [1.81-2.54], p < 0.001) and implant complications at 90 days (1.52 [1.42-1.62], p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patients with allergies were more likely to require revision surgery, experience wound complications, sepsis and PJI following TSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":"20 3 Suppl 1","pages":"527-533"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528767/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78309990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Loneliness, Discrimination, Stress, and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Young Adults. 年轻人的孤独感、歧视、压力和 2 型糖尿病风险。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.019
Caleb Harrison, Maya I Ragavan, Margaret F Zupa, Xu Qin, Vicki S Helgeson, Mary Ellen Vajravelu

Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the associations between type 2 diabetes or prediabetes and loneliness and related social experiences in young adults, a population at increasingly high risk of type 2 diabetes.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis using data from adults aged 18-35 years enrolled in the All of Us Research Program. Exposures included loneliness, social support, discrimination, neighborhood social cohesion, and stress, measured by standardized surveys. The main outcome was type 2 diabetes or prediabetes by self-report or linked health record. Logistic regression determined the odds of type 2 diabetes/prediabetes for each survey measure, adjusting for age, sex, race or ethnicity, income, and family history. Latent class analysis evaluated clustering of social experiences. Data were collected from 2018 to 2022 and analyzed in May 2023-June 2024.

Results: The cohort included 14,217 young adults (aged 28.2 ± 4.4 years, 73.1% [n=10,391] women, 64.1% [n=9,111] White, 10.6% [n=1,506] Hispanic, 5.7% [n=806] Black, and 9.1% [n=1,299] multiracial). Overall, 5.5% (n=777) had either prediabetes or type 2 diabetes. The 2 highest loneliness quartiles were associated with increased odds of prediabetes/type 2 diabetes (Q3: OR=1.42 [95% CI=1.15, 1.76] and Q4: OR=1.78 [95% CI=1.45, 2.19]). Greater stress and discrimination and lower social support and neighborhood social cohesion were also associated with increased odds of prediabetes/type 2 diabetes. Latent class analysis revealed 3 distinct phenotypes, with elevated odds of prediabetes/type 2 diabetes in the 2 with the most adverse social profiles (OR=2.32 [95% CI=1.89, 2.84] and OR=1.28 [95% CI=1.04, 1.58]).

Conclusions: Loneliness and related experiences are strongly associated with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes in young adults. Whether these factors could be leveraged to reduce type 2 diabetes risk should be investigated.

简介本研究旨在确定2型糖尿病(T2D)或糖尿病前期与年轻人(T2D高危人群)的孤独感及相关社会经历之间的关系:这是一项横断面分析,使用的数据来自参加 "我们所有人研究计划 "的 18-35 岁成年人。暴露因素包括孤独感、社会支持、歧视、邻里社会凝聚力和压力,均通过标准化调查进行测量。主要结果是通过自我报告或链接健康记录得出的 T2D 或糖尿病前期。逻辑回归确定了每项调查测量的 T2D/糖尿病前期几率,并对年龄、性别、种族或民族、收入和家族史进行了调整。潜类分析(LCA)评估了社会经历的聚类。数据收集时间为 2018-2022 年,分析时间为 2023 年 5 月至 2024 年 6 月:队列包括 14217 名年轻成年人(28.2 ± 4.4 岁;70.3%(n=9792)为女性;64.1%(n=9111)为白人,10.6%(n=1506)为西班牙裔,5.7%(n=806)为黑人,9.1%(n=1299)为多种族)。总体而言,5.5%(n=777)的人患有糖尿病前期或 T2D。孤独感最高的两个四分位数与糖尿病前期/T2D 的几率增加有关(Q3:OR 1.42 [95% CI 1.15-1.76];Q4:1.75 [95% CI 1.43-2.16])。较大的压力和歧视以及较低的社会支持和邻里社会凝聚力也与糖尿病前期/T2D 的几率增加有关。LCA显示了三种不同的表型,其中社会状况最差的两种表型的糖尿病前期/T2D几率更高(OR 2.32 [95% CI 1.89-2.84]和OR 1.28 [95% CI 1.04-1.58]):结论:孤独感和相关经历与年轻人的 T2D 和糖尿病前期密切相关。结论:孤独感和相关经历与年轻人的终末期糖尿病和糖尿病前期密切相关,是否可以利用这些因素来降低终末期糖尿病的风险值得研究。
{"title":"Loneliness, Discrimination, Stress, and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Young Adults.","authors":"Caleb Harrison, Maya I Ragavan, Margaret F Zupa, Xu Qin, Vicki S Helgeson, Mary Ellen Vajravelu","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the associations between type 2 diabetes or prediabetes and loneliness and related social experiences in young adults, a population at increasingly high risk of type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional analysis using data from adults aged 18-35 years enrolled in the All of Us Research Program. Exposures included loneliness, social support, discrimination, neighborhood social cohesion, and stress, measured by standardized surveys. The main outcome was type 2 diabetes or prediabetes by self-report or linked health record. Logistic regression determined the odds of type 2 diabetes/prediabetes for each survey measure, adjusting for age, sex, race or ethnicity, income, and family history. Latent class analysis evaluated clustering of social experiences. Data were collected from 2018 to 2022 and analyzed in May 2023-June 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 14,217 young adults (aged 28.2 ± 4.4 years, 73.1% [n=10,391] women, 64.1% [n=9,111] White, 10.6% [n=1,506] Hispanic, 5.7% [n=806] Black, and 9.1% [n=1,299] multiracial). Overall, 5.5% (n=777) had either prediabetes or type 2 diabetes. The 2 highest loneliness quartiles were associated with increased odds of prediabetes/type 2 diabetes (Q3: OR=1.42 [95% CI=1.15, 1.76] and Q4: OR=1.78 [95% CI=1.45, 2.19]). Greater stress and discrimination and lower social support and neighborhood social cohesion were also associated with increased odds of prediabetes/type 2 diabetes. Latent class analysis revealed 3 distinct phenotypes, with elevated odds of prediabetes/type 2 diabetes in the 2 with the most adverse social profiles (OR=2.32 [95% CI=1.89, 2.84] and OR=1.28 [95% CI=1.04, 1.58]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Loneliness and related experiences are strongly associated with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes in young adults. Whether these factors could be leveraged to reduce type 2 diabetes risk should be investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social Risk Factors, Health Insurance Coverage, and Inequities in Access to Care. 社会风险因素、医疗保险覆盖率和就医不平等。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.005
Kevin H Nguyen, Megan B Cole

Introduction: Social risk factors are associated with worse access to care. This study measured the prevalence of social risk factors among low-income adults, assessed the relationship between number of social risk factors and access to care, and examined heterogeneity by health insurance type.

Methods: Using 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey data from 39 states, the association between number of SRFs (0, 1, 2-3, 4, or more) and three access to care measures (having a personal doctor, having a routine checkup, and inability to see doctor because of cost) were measured using multivariable linear probability models. The analysis was stratified by health insurance coverage type (private, Medicare, Medicaid, or uninsured) to assess whether effects were differential. Analyses were conducted in 2024.

Results: Among 90,208 low-income adults, 46.6% reported at least one SRF. Compared to people who reported no SRFs, those who reported four or more were more likely to report being unable to afford care (28.21 percentage points [PP], p<0.001) and less likely to have a personal doctor (-4.98 PP, p<0.001) or routine checkup in the last two years (-4.29 PP, p<0.001). The magnitude of disparity by number of SRFs in inability to afford care was larger among privately insured and uninsured people compared to those with Medicare or Medicaid coverage.

Conclusions: Higher levels of SRFs were associated with worse access to care among low-income adults. Policies that minimize cost-related barriers to care, coupled with care delivery reforms and social policies that address SRFs, may improve access to care.

简介社会风险因素与更难获得医疗服务有关。本研究测量了社会风险因素在低收入成年人中的流行程度,评估了社会风险因素数量与获得医疗服务之间的关系,并研究了医疗保险类型的异质性:使用来自 39 个州的 2022 年行为风险因素监测调查数据,使用多变量线性概率模型测量了社会风险因素数量(0、1、2-3、4 或更多)与三项医疗服务可及性指标(拥有私人医生、进行常规检查和因费用问题无法看病)之间的关系。分析按医疗保险类型(私人、医疗保险、医疗补助或无保险)进行分层,以评估是否存在差异。分析于 2024 年进行:在 90,208 名低收入成年人中,46.6% 的人报告至少有一个 SRF。与没有报告 SRF 的人相比,报告了四个或四个以上 SRF 的人更有可能报告负担不起医疗费用(28.21 个百分点 [PP],pConclusions:在低收入成年人中,SRF 水平越高,获得医疗服务的情况越差。最大限度地减少与费用相关的医疗障碍的政策,加上医疗服务改革和解决自力更生障碍的社会政策,可能会改善医疗服务的可及性。
{"title":"Social Risk Factors, Health Insurance Coverage, and Inequities in Access to Care.","authors":"Kevin H Nguyen, Megan B Cole","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social risk factors are associated with worse access to care. This study measured the prevalence of social risk factors among low-income adults, assessed the relationship between number of social risk factors and access to care, and examined heterogeneity by health insurance type.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey data from 39 states, the association between number of SRFs (0, 1, 2-3, 4, or more) and three access to care measures (having a personal doctor, having a routine checkup, and inability to see doctor because of cost) were measured using multivariable linear probability models. The analysis was stratified by health insurance coverage type (private, Medicare, Medicaid, or uninsured) to assess whether effects were differential. Analyses were conducted in 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 90,208 low-income adults, 46.6% reported at least one SRF. Compared to people who reported no SRFs, those who reported four or more were more likely to report being unable to afford care (28.21 percentage points [PP], p<0.001) and less likely to have a personal doctor (-4.98 PP, p<0.001) or routine checkup in the last two years (-4.29 PP, p<0.001). The magnitude of disparity by number of SRFs in inability to afford care was larger among privately insured and uninsured people compared to those with Medicare or Medicaid coverage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher levels of SRFs were associated with worse access to care among low-income adults. Policies that minimize cost-related barriers to care, coupled with care delivery reforms and social policies that address SRFs, may improve access to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142479935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Achieving Equitable Lung Cancer Screening Implementation in a Texas Safety Net Health System. 在得克萨斯州安全网医疗系统中实现公平的肺癌筛查。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.016
Michael Pignone, Patrick Chang, Nicole Kluz, Brandon Altillo, Andrea Fekete, Amaris Martinez, Rachel Medbery, Yvonne Queralt, Koonj Shah, LaTasha Vanin

Introduction: A lung cancer screening program using low dose CT (LDCT) in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in Central Texas was developed and assessed for equitable implementation.

Methods: From 11/2020-8/2023, patients aged 55-77 years who currently smoked or quit within 15 years with ≥20 pack-years of exposure were identified through EHR query and mailed outreach, or through direct provider referrals. A bilingual social worker confirmed eligibility, provided telecare shared decision-making (SDM), coordinated screening, and offered smoking cessation. To assess equity, LDCT completion across demographics was compared, in 2023.

Results: A total of 6,486 patients were mailed outreach materials; 479 patients responded, of whom 108 (22.5%) were eligible and 71 (65.7%) participated in SDM. 629 eligible patients were referred internally; 579 (92.0%) completed SDM. Of the 650 patients who completed SDM, 636 (97.8%) agreed to screening. Mean age was 61.7 years; 38.1% were female. The population was diverse: 35.8% identified as Latino, 17.8% as African-American, 26.8% had Medicare or Medicaid, 48.0% used the county medical assistance program, 14.2% were uninsured, and 76.7% currently smoked. Overall, 528 (83.0%) patients completed LDCT. There were no statistically significant differences in completion by age, gender, race/ethnicity, or insurance status. Spanish-speaking patients were more likely to complete the CT than English speakers (OR 2.22, 95% CI=1.22, 4.41) and those who formerly smoked were more likely to complete the CT than patients who currently smoked (OR 1.93, 95% CI=1.12, 3.51).

Conclusions: The navigator-centered program achieved equitable implementation of lung cancer screening in a diverse FQHC system.

简介:德克萨斯州中部一家联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)制定了一项使用低剂量 CT(LDCT)的肺癌筛查计划,并对其公平实施情况进行了评估:德克萨斯州中部一家联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)制定了一项使用低剂量 CT(LDCT)的肺癌筛查计划,并对该计划的公平实施情况进行了评估:从 2020 年 11 月至 2023 年 8 月,通过电子病历查询和邮寄宣传材料,或通过医疗服务提供者的直接转介,确定了 55-77 岁、目前吸烟或 15 年内戒烟且吸烟量≥ 20 包年的患者。一名双语社工负责确认资格、提供远程护理共同决策 (SDM)、协调筛查并提供戒烟服务。为了评估公平性,我们对 2023 年不同人口统计学特征的 LDCT 完成情况进行了比较:向 6486 名患者邮寄了宣传材料;479 名患者做出了回复,其中 108 人(22.5%)符合条件,71 人(65.7%)参与了 SDM。629 名符合条件的患者被内部转诊,其中 579 人(92.0%)完成了 SDM。在完成 SDM 的 650 名患者中,有 636 人(97.8%)同意接受筛查。平均年龄为 61.7 岁;38.1% 为女性。人群具有多样性:35.8%为拉丁裔,17.8%为非裔美国人,26.8%有医疗保险或医疗补助计划,48.0%使用县医疗补助计划,14.2%无保险,76.7%目前吸烟。总体而言,528 名患者(83.0%)完成了 LDCT。不同年龄、性别、种族/民族或保险状况的患者在完成率上没有明显的统计学差异。讲西班牙语的患者比讲英语的患者更有可能完成 CT(OR 2.22,95% CI 1.22,4.41),曾经吸烟的患者比目前吸烟的患者更有可能完成 CT(OR 1.93,95% CI 1.12,3.51):以领航员为中心的项目实现了在多样化的家庭健康服务中心系统中公平实施肺癌筛查。
{"title":"Achieving Equitable Lung Cancer Screening Implementation in a Texas Safety Net Health System.","authors":"Michael Pignone, Patrick Chang, Nicole Kluz, Brandon Altillo, Andrea Fekete, Amaris Martinez, Rachel Medbery, Yvonne Queralt, Koonj Shah, LaTasha Vanin","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A lung cancer screening program using low dose CT (LDCT) in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in Central Texas was developed and assessed for equitable implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 11/2020-8/2023, patients aged 55-77 years who currently smoked or quit within 15 years with ≥20 pack-years of exposure were identified through EHR query and mailed outreach, or through direct provider referrals. A bilingual social worker confirmed eligibility, provided telecare shared decision-making (SDM), coordinated screening, and offered smoking cessation. To assess equity, LDCT completion across demographics was compared, in 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6,486 patients were mailed outreach materials; 479 patients responded, of whom 108 (22.5%) were eligible and 71 (65.7%) participated in SDM. 629 eligible patients were referred internally; 579 (92.0%) completed SDM. Of the 650 patients who completed SDM, 636 (97.8%) agreed to screening. Mean age was 61.7 years; 38.1% were female. The population was diverse: 35.8% identified as Latino, 17.8% as African-American, 26.8% had Medicare or Medicaid, 48.0% used the county medical assistance program, 14.2% were uninsured, and 76.7% currently smoked. Overall, 528 (83.0%) patients completed LDCT. There were no statistically significant differences in completion by age, gender, race/ethnicity, or insurance status. Spanish-speaking patients were more likely to complete the CT than English speakers (OR 2.22, 95% CI=1.22, 4.41) and those who formerly smoked were more likely to complete the CT than patients who currently smoked (OR 1.93, 95% CI=1.12, 3.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The navigator-centered program achieved equitable implementation of lung cancer screening in a diverse FQHC system.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142331830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Appalachian Primary Care Patients' Quit Readiness and Tobacco Treatment Receipt. 阿巴拉契亚初级保健患者的戒烟准备和烟草治疗接受情况。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.017
Jessica L Burris, Abigayle R Feather, Asal Pilehvari, Sarah Cooper, Amie M Ashcraft, Roger Anderson, Amy Ferketich

Introduction: Healthcare providers should facilitate smoking cessation, and primary care is an ideal setting for delivering this evidence-based care. This study's objective was to describe readiness to quit smoking combustible cigarettes among adult Appalachian primary care patients and determine their providers' implementation of an established tobacco treatment model.

Methods: As part of a randomized clinical trial, 298 providers in 10 health systems across 4 states received tobacco treatment training. Periodically between January 2022 and June 2023, anonymous surveys were distributed to patients after primary care visits. The survey included questions about demographics, visit type, smoking status, readiness to quit, and provider behavior related to tobacco treatment implementation. In 2023, descriptive statistics, bivariate tests and logistic regression models were conducted.

Results: Among 1,242 survey respondents, 34.1% reported current smoking. Among those who reported current smoking, 13.9% expressed readiness to quit within the next 30 days and 15.3% reported readiness in 1-6 months while 36.7% indicated "never" wanting to quit. Nearly all providers asked respondents about smoking status (96.9%) and advised them to quit (89.8%); fewer providers engaged in cessation assistance by discussing behavioral counseling, discussing medication options, and/or prescribing medication (25.1%-64.6% across behaviors). Provider behavior was most consistently associated with patient age and visit type.

Conclusions: Nearly one third of Appalachian patients who smoke reported readiness to quit within 6 months and nearly all received advice to quit from their provider. Patients would benefit from more intensive tobacco treatment delivery in primary care settings, with a focus on assisting with quit attempts.

简介:医疗服务提供者应促进戒烟,而初级保健是提供这种循证医疗服务的理想场所。本研究的目的是描述阿巴拉契亚初级保健成年患者戒除可燃卷烟的准备情况,并确定医疗服务提供者实施既定烟草治疗模式的情况:作为随机临床试验的一部分,四个州 10 个医疗系统的 298 名医疗服务提供者接受了烟草治疗培训。2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月期间,定期在初级保健就诊后向患者发放匿名调查问卷。调查内容包括人口统计学、就诊类型、吸烟状况、戒烟意愿以及医疗服务提供者与烟草治疗实施相关的行为。2023 年,我们进行了描述性统计、双变量检验和逻辑回归模型:在1242名调查对象中,34.1%的人表示目前正在吸烟。在目前吸烟的受访者中,13.9% 表示准备在未来 30 天内戒烟,15.3% 表示准备在 1-6 个月内戒烟,36.7% 表示 "从未 "想戒烟。几乎所有的医疗服务提供者都询问了受访者的吸烟情况(96.9%),并建议他们戒烟(89.8%);通过讨论行为咨询、讨论药物选择和/或开具药物处方来提供戒烟帮助的医疗服务提供者较少(25.1%-64.6%)。医疗服务提供者的行为与患者年龄和就诊类型的关系最为密切:近三分之一的阿巴拉契亚吸烟患者表示准备在 6 个月内戒烟,几乎所有患者都接受了医疗服务提供者的戒烟建议。在初级医疗机构提供更深入的烟草治疗,重点帮助患者尝试戒烟,将使患者受益匪浅。
{"title":"Appalachian Primary Care Patients' Quit Readiness and Tobacco Treatment Receipt.","authors":"Jessica L Burris, Abigayle R Feather, Asal Pilehvari, Sarah Cooper, Amie M Ashcraft, Roger Anderson, Amy Ferketich","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Healthcare providers should facilitate smoking cessation, and primary care is an ideal setting for delivering this evidence-based care. This study's objective was to describe readiness to quit smoking combustible cigarettes among adult Appalachian primary care patients and determine their providers' implementation of an established tobacco treatment model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a randomized clinical trial, 298 providers in 10 health systems across 4 states received tobacco treatment training. Periodically between January 2022 and June 2023, anonymous surveys were distributed to patients after primary care visits. The survey included questions about demographics, visit type, smoking status, readiness to quit, and provider behavior related to tobacco treatment implementation. In 2023, descriptive statistics, bivariate tests and logistic regression models were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,242 survey respondents, 34.1% reported current smoking. Among those who reported current smoking, 13.9% expressed readiness to quit within the next 30 days and 15.3% reported readiness in 1-6 months while 36.7% indicated \"never\" wanting to quit. Nearly all providers asked respondents about smoking status (96.9%) and advised them to quit (89.8%); fewer providers engaged in cessation assistance by discussing behavioral counseling, discussing medication options, and/or prescribing medication (25.1%-64.6% across behaviors). Provider behavior was most consistently associated with patient age and visit type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nearly one third of Appalachian patients who smoke reported readiness to quit within 6 months and nearly all received advice to quit from their provider. Patients would benefit from more intensive tobacco treatment delivery in primary care settings, with a focus on assisting with quit attempts.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142331831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Screening for the Need and Desire for Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: A Systematic Review. 对性健康和生殖健康服务需求和愿望的筛查:系统回顾。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.08.008
Divya Vohra, Jamie L Manzer, Theresa Neelan, Zoe Michaelson, Edith Felix, Mindy Wong, Quasheba Allen, Alex Baum, Kelsey Chestnut, Jessica Falbaum, Vanessa Taylor, Lindsey M Bryant, Victoria Wible, Burak Yuksel, Jennifer Blum

Introduction: Proactively engaging patients in conversations about their needs and desires for sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is an essential part of providing client-centered care. This systematic literature identifies screening tools and approaches for assessing needs and desires for pregnancy- and STI-related services.

Methods: PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published between July 1, 2018 and July 26, 2023. Eligible studies examined the use of screening tools for various SRH services. This manuscript focuses on evidence from 28 articles that examine findings related to pregnancy and STI screening.

Results: The evidence suggests that using these tools can increase the number of patients who receive care. The tools also facilitate clients' discussions with their providers about reproductive health goals and needs. Patients appreciate tools that are easy to use and help them have non-judgmental interactions with providers and promote shared decision-making and bodily autonomy. Providers reported a preference for screening tools that are easy to use, quick to administer, and can be integrated into existing workflows.

Conclusions: Screening tools are important for identifying clients' needs and desires as well as informing and streamlining care. More research is needed to better understand the diversity of provider and patient experiences with screening tools and whether the use of such tools promotes accessible and equitable service provision. There was insufficient evidence to recommend any specific screening tool or approach for assessing pregnancy or STI needs and desires because most tools were reported either in a single study or results were mixed.

Trial registration: Prospero - CRD420234486.

简介积极主动地让患者参与有关其性健康和生殖健康(SRH)需求和愿望的对话,是提供以患者为中心的医疗服务的重要组成部分。本系统性文献确定了评估怀孕和性传播感染相关服务需求和愿望的筛查工具和方法:检索了 PubMed 和 Cochrane 图书馆在 2018 年 7 月 1 日至 2023 年 7 月 26 日期间发表的文章。符合条件的研究考察了各种性健康和生殖健康服务筛查工具的使用情况。本手稿重点关注 28 篇文章中与妊娠和性传播感染筛查相关的证据:结果:证据表明,使用这些工具可以增加接受治疗的患者人数。这些工具还有助于患者与服务提供者讨论生殖健康目标和需求。患者喜欢易于使用的工具,这些工具可以帮助他们与医疗服务提供者进行非评判性的互动,促进共同决策和身体自主。医疗服务提供者表示,他们更青睐于使用方便、管理快捷并能融入现有工作流程的筛查工具:筛查工具对于确定客户的需求和愿望以及提供信息和简化护理非常重要。需要开展更多的研究,以更好地了解提供者和患者在使用筛查工具时的不同体验,以及使用此类工具是否能促进提供方便、公平的服务。目前还没有足够的证据来推荐任何特定的筛查工具或方法来评估怀孕或性传播感染的需求和愿望,因为大多数工具都是在单项研究中报告的,或者结果参差不齐:试验注册:Prospero - CRD420234486。
{"title":"Screening for the Need and Desire for Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Divya Vohra, Jamie L Manzer, Theresa Neelan, Zoe Michaelson, Edith Felix, Mindy Wong, Quasheba Allen, Alex Baum, Kelsey Chestnut, Jessica Falbaum, Vanessa Taylor, Lindsey M Bryant, Victoria Wible, Burak Yuksel, Jennifer Blum","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.08.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proactively engaging patients in conversations about their needs and desires for sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is an essential part of providing client-centered care. This systematic literature identifies screening tools and approaches for assessing needs and desires for pregnancy- and STI-related services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published between July 1, 2018 and July 26, 2023. Eligible studies examined the use of screening tools for various SRH services. This manuscript focuses on evidence from 28 articles that examine findings related to pregnancy and STI screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The evidence suggests that using these tools can increase the number of patients who receive care. The tools also facilitate clients' discussions with their providers about reproductive health goals and needs. Patients appreciate tools that are easy to use and help them have non-judgmental interactions with providers and promote shared decision-making and bodily autonomy. Providers reported a preference for screening tools that are easy to use, quick to administer, and can be integrated into existing workflows.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Screening tools are important for identifying clients' needs and desires as well as informing and streamlining care. More research is needed to better understand the diversity of provider and patient experiences with screening tools and whether the use of such tools promotes accessible and equitable service provision. There was insufficient evidence to recommend any specific screening tool or approach for assessing pregnancy or STI needs and desires because most tools were reported either in a single study or results were mixed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Prospero - CRD420234486.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142683308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Trends, 2010-2022: An Update with Final Data. 心血管疾病死亡率趋势,2010-2022 年:最终数据更新。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.014
Rebecca C Woodruff, Xin Tong, Fleetwood V Loustalot, Sadiya S Khan, Nilay S Shah, Sandra L Jackson, Adam S Vaughan

Introduction: Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) increased in 2020 and 2021, and provisional data indicated an increase in 2022, resulting in substantial excess CVD deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic. Updated estimates using final data for 2022 are needed.

Methods: The National Vital Statistics System's final Multiple Cause of Death files were analyzed in 2024 to calculate AAMR from 2010 to 2022 and excess deaths from 2020 to 2022 for U.S. adults aged ≥35 years, with CVD as the underlying cause of death.

Results: The CVD AAMR among adults aged ≥35 years in 2022 was 434.6 deaths per 100,000 (95% CI=433.8, 435.5), which was lower than in 2021 (451.8 deaths per 100,000; 95% CI=450.9, 452.7). The most recent year with a similarly high CVD AAMR as in 2022 was 2012 (434.7 deaths per 100,000 population, 95% CI=433.8, 435.7). The CVD AAMR for 2022 calculated using provisional data overestimated the AAMR calculated using final data by 4.6% (95% CI=4.3%, 4.9%) or 19.9 (95% CI=18.6, 21.2) deaths per 100,000 population. From 2020 to 2022, an estimated 190,661 (95% CI=158,139, 223,325) excess CVD deaths occurred.

Conclusions: In 2022, the CVD AAMR among adults aged ≥35 years did not increase, but rather declined from a peak in 2021, signaling improvements in adverse mortality trends that began in 2020, amid the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the 2022 CVD AAMR remains higher than observed before the COVID-19 pandemic, indicating an ongoing need for CVD prevention, detection, and management.

导言:心血管疾病(CVD)的年龄调整死亡率(AAMR)在2020年和2021年有所上升,临时数据显示2022年也有所上升,导致COVID-19大流行期间心血管疾病死亡人数大幅增加。需要使用 2022 年的最终数据进行更新估计:方法:分析美国国家生命统计系统 2024 年的最终多死因档案,计算 2010 年至 2022 年的急性心血管病急性死亡率,以及 2020 年至 2022 年以心血管病为基本死因的美国≥35 岁成人的超额死亡人数:2022年年龄≥35岁的成年人心血管疾病急性死亡率为每10万人434.6例死亡(95% CI:433.8,435.5),低于2021年(每10万人451.8例死亡;95% CI:450.9,452.7)。最近一年心血管疾病急性死亡率与2022年类似高的年份是2012年(每10万人中有434.7人死亡,95% CI:433.8, 435.7)。使用临时数据计算的2022年心血管疾病急性死亡率比使用最终数据计算的急性死亡率高估了4.6%(95% CI:4.3%,4.9%),即每10万人中有19.9人死亡(95% CI:18.6,21.2)。从 2020 年到 2022 年,估计会有 190,661 例(95% CI:158,139 例,223,325 例)心血管疾病过量死亡:2022年,年龄≥35岁的成年人心血管疾病急性死亡率没有上升,而是从2021年的峰值开始下降,这表明从2020年COVID-19大流行时开始的不良死亡率趋势有所改善。然而,2022年心血管疾病急性死亡率仍高于COVID-19大流行前的水平,这表明心血管疾病的预防、检测和管理仍有必要。
{"title":"Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Trends, 2010-2022: An Update with Final Data.","authors":"Rebecca C Woodruff, Xin Tong, Fleetwood V Loustalot, Sadiya S Khan, Nilay S Shah, Sandra L Jackson, Adam S Vaughan","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) increased in 2020 and 2021, and provisional data indicated an increase in 2022, resulting in substantial excess CVD deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic. Updated estimates using final data for 2022 are needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Vital Statistics System's final Multiple Cause of Death files were analyzed in 2024 to calculate AAMR from 2010 to 2022 and excess deaths from 2020 to 2022 for U.S. adults aged ≥35 years, with CVD as the underlying cause of death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CVD AAMR among adults aged ≥35 years in 2022 was 434.6 deaths per 100,000 (95% CI=433.8, 435.5), which was lower than in 2021 (451.8 deaths per 100,000; 95% CI=450.9, 452.7). The most recent year with a similarly high CVD AAMR as in 2022 was 2012 (434.7 deaths per 100,000 population, 95% CI=433.8, 435.7). The CVD AAMR for 2022 calculated using provisional data overestimated the AAMR calculated using final data by 4.6% (95% CI=4.3%, 4.9%) or 19.9 (95% CI=18.6, 21.2) deaths per 100,000 population. From 2020 to 2022, an estimated 190,661 (95% CI=158,139, 223,325) excess CVD deaths occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In 2022, the CVD AAMR among adults aged ≥35 years did not increase, but rather declined from a peak in 2021, signaling improvements in adverse mortality trends that began in 2020, amid the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the 2022 CVD AAMR remains higher than observed before the COVID-19 pandemic, indicating an ongoing need for CVD prevention, detection, and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142331832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1