首页 > 最新文献

American Journal of Preventive Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Sitting Time, Physical Activity and Mortality: A Cohort Study In Low-Income Older Americans. 坐的时间、体力活动和死亡率:对美国低收入老年人的队列研究。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.07.018
Lili Liu, Wanqing Wen, Shaneda W Andersen, Martha J Shrubsole, Mark D Steinwandel, Loren E Lipworth, Staci L Sudenga, Wei Zheng

Introduction: Physical inactivity and sedentary behavior are recognized as independent risk factors for many diseases. However, studies investigating their associations with total and cause-specific mortality in low-income and Black populations are limited, particularly among older adults.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted among 8,337 predominantly low-income and Black Americans aged ≥65 years residing in the southern United States. Participants reported their daily sitting time and leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) at baseline (2002-2009), and mortality data were collected through 2019. Analysis was conducted from September 2022 to October 2023.

Results: During a median follow-up of 12.25 years, nearly 50% (n=4,111) were deceased. A prolonged sitting time (>10 hours/day versus <4 hours/day) was associated with elevated all-cause mortality (hazard ratios [HR], 1.15; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.04-1.27) after adjusting for LTPA and other potential confounders. LTPA was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality, with an adjusted HR of 0.75 (95% CI 0.64, 0.88) associated with 150-300 minutes per week of moderate-intensity physical activity. Individuals who were physically inactive and had a sitting time of >10 hours/day had the highest mortality risk (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.23-1.78), compared with those who were physically active and had low sitting time. These associations were more pronounced for mortality due to cardiovascular diseases.

Conclusions: High sitting time is an independent risk factor for all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality, and LTPA could partially attenuate the adverse association of prolonged sitting time with mortality.

导言:缺乏运动和久坐不动被认为是许多疾病的独立风险因素。然而,在低收入人群和黑人群体中,特别是在老年人中,调查这两种因素与总死亡率和特定原因死亡率之间关系的研究非常有限:方法:对居住在美国南部的 8,337 名年龄≥65 岁的美国黑人进行了前瞻性队列研究。参与者报告了他们在基线(2002-2009 年)时的每日坐立时间和闲暇时间体力活动(LTPA),并收集了直至 2019 年的死亡率数据。分析时间为 2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 10 月:在 12.25 年的中位随访期间,近 50%(n = 4,111 人)的人死亡。与运动量大且久坐时间少的人相比,久坐时间长(>10 小时/天 vs. 10 小时/天)的人死亡风险最高(HR,1.48;95% CI,1.23-1.78)。这些关联在心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率中更为明显:结论:久坐时间长是导致全因死亡率和心血管疾病死亡率的独立风险因素,而长期体育锻炼可部分缓解久坐时间长与死亡率之间的不良关联。
{"title":"Sitting Time, Physical Activity and Mortality: A Cohort Study In Low-Income Older Americans.","authors":"Lili Liu, Wanqing Wen, Shaneda W Andersen, Martha J Shrubsole, Mark D Steinwandel, Loren E Lipworth, Staci L Sudenga, Wei Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.07.018","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.07.018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physical inactivity and sedentary behavior are recognized as independent risk factors for many diseases. However, studies investigating their associations with total and cause-specific mortality in low-income and Black populations are limited, particularly among older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted among 8,337 predominantly low-income and Black Americans aged ≥65 years residing in the southern United States. Participants reported their daily sitting time and leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) at baseline (2002-2009), and mortality data were collected through 2019. Analysis was conducted from September 2022 to October 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up of 12.25 years, nearly 50% (n=4,111) were deceased. A prolonged sitting time (>10 hours/day versus <4 hours/day) was associated with elevated all-cause mortality (hazard ratios [HR], 1.15; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.04-1.27) after adjusting for LTPA and other potential confounders. LTPA was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality, with an adjusted HR of 0.75 (95% CI 0.64, 0.88) associated with 150-300 minutes per week of moderate-intensity physical activity. Individuals who were physically inactive and had a sitting time of >10 hours/day had the highest mortality risk (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.23-1.78), compared with those who were physically active and had low sitting time. These associations were more pronounced for mortality due to cardiovascular diseases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High sitting time is an independent risk factor for all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality, and LTPA could partially attenuate the adverse association of prolonged sitting time with mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"924-931"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141876639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pain Management Treatments and Opioid Use Disorder Risk in Medicaid Patients. 医疗补助患者的疼痛治疗和阿片类药物使用障碍风险。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.07.006
Kara E Rudolph, Nicholas T Williams, Ivan Diaz, Sarah Forrest, Katherine L Hoffman, Hillary Samples, Mark Olfson, Lisa Doan, Magdalena Cerda, Rachael K Ross

Introduction: People with chronic pain are at increased risk of opioid misuse. Less is known about the unique risk conferred by each pain management treatment, as treatments are typically implemented together, confounding their independent effects. This study estimated the extent to which pain management treatments were associated with risk of opioid use disorder (OUD) for those with chronic pain, controlling for baseline demographic and clinical confounding variables and holding other pain management treatments at their observed levels.

Methods: Data were analyzed in 2024 from 2 chronic pain subgroups within a cohort of non-pregnant Medicaid patients aged 35-64 years, 2016-2019, from 25 states: those with (1) chronic pain and physical disability (CPPD) (N=6,133) or (2) chronic pain without disability (CP) (N=67,438). Nine pain management treatments were considered: prescription opioid (1) dose and (2) duration; (3) number of opioid prescribers; opioid co-prescription with (4) benzo- diazepines, (5) muscle relaxants, and (6) gabapentinoids; (7) nonopioid pain prescription, (8) physical therapy, and (9) other pain treatment modality. The outcome was OUD risk.

Results: Having opioids co-prescribed with gabapentin or benzodiazepine was statistically significantly associated with a 37-45% increased OUD risk for the CP subgroup. Opioid dose and duration also were significantly associated with increased OUD risk in this subgroup. Physical therapy was significantly associated with an 18% decreased risk of OUD in the CP subgroup.

Conclusions: Coprescription of opioids with either gabapentin or benzodiazepines may substantially increase OUD risk. More positively, physical therapy may be a relatively accessible and safe pain management strategy.

导言:慢性疼痛患者滥用阿片类药物的风险增加。人们对每种疼痛治疗方法所带来的独特风险知之甚少,因为这些治疗方法通常是一起实施的,从而混淆了它们的独立效应。本研究估算了疼痛管理治疗与慢性疼痛患者阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)风险的相关程度,同时控制了基线人口统计学变量和临床混杂变量,并将其他疼痛管理治疗保持在观察到的水平:分析了 2024 年来自 25 个州的 35-64 岁非怀孕医疗补助患者队列中两个慢性疼痛亚组的数据:1)慢性疼痛和身体残疾(CPPD)(N=6,133)或 2)无残疾慢性疼痛(CP)(N=67,438)。研究考虑了九种疼痛治疗方法:阿片类药物处方(i)剂量和(ii)持续时间;(iii)阿片类药物处方者的数量;阿片类药物与(iv)苯并地西泮类药物、(v)肌肉松弛剂和(vi)加巴喷丁类药物的联合处方;(vii)非阿片类药物止痛处方;(viii)物理治疗;以及(ix)其他疼痛治疗方式。研究结果为 OUD 风险:结果:在CP亚组中,阿片类药物与加巴喷丁或苯二氮卓类药物同时处方与OUD风险增加37%-45%有显著统计学关联。阿片类药物的剂量和持续时间也与该亚组的 OUD 风险增加有显著相关性。在 CP 亚组中,物理治疗与 OUD 风险降低 18% 明显相关:结论:阿片类药物与加巴喷丁或苯二氮卓类药物同时处方可能会大大增加 OUD 风险。更积极的是,物理治疗可能是一种相对容易获得且安全的疼痛管理策略。
{"title":"Pain Management Treatments and Opioid Use Disorder Risk in Medicaid Patients.","authors":"Kara E Rudolph, Nicholas T Williams, Ivan Diaz, Sarah Forrest, Katherine L Hoffman, Hillary Samples, Mark Olfson, Lisa Doan, Magdalena Cerda, Rachael K Ross","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.07.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>People with chronic pain are at increased risk of opioid misuse. Less is known about the unique risk conferred by each pain management treatment, as treatments are typically implemented together, confounding their independent effects. This study estimated the extent to which pain management treatments were associated with risk of opioid use disorder (OUD) for those with chronic pain, controlling for baseline demographic and clinical confounding variables and holding other pain management treatments at their observed levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were analyzed in 2024 from 2 chronic pain subgroups within a cohort of non-pregnant Medicaid patients aged 35-64 years, 2016-2019, from 25 states: those with (1) chronic pain and physical disability (CPPD) (N=6,133) or (2) chronic pain without disability (CP) (N=67,438). Nine pain management treatments were considered: prescription opioid (1) dose and (2) duration; (3) number of opioid prescribers; opioid co-prescription with (4) benzo- diazepines, (5) muscle relaxants, and (6) gabapentinoids; (7) nonopioid pain prescription, (8) physical therapy, and (9) other pain treatment modality. The outcome was OUD risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Having opioids co-prescribed with gabapentin or benzodiazepine was statistically significantly associated with a 37-45% increased OUD risk for the CP subgroup. Opioid dose and duration also were significantly associated with increased OUD risk in this subgroup. Physical therapy was significantly associated with an 18% decreased risk of OUD in the CP subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Coprescription of opioids with either gabapentin or benzodiazepines may substantially increase OUD risk. More positively, physical therapy may be a relatively accessible and safe pain management strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"878-886"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585455/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141724995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Whole-of-School Physical Activity Promotion: Findings From Elementary Schools in the United States. 全校体育活动推广:美国小学的研究结果。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.08.003
Derek W Craig, Christopher D Pfledderer, Natalia I Heredia, Kevin Lanza, Kempson Onadeko, Andjelka Pavlovic, Jizyah Injil, Laura F DeFina, Timothy J Walker

Introduction: Schools can support students' participation in physical activity by offering opportunities consistent with a Whole-of-School (WOS) approach; however, the extent to which physical activity opportunities are provided and how school-level characteristics associate with their use remains unclear. This study examined how elementary schools' use a WOS approach to promote physical activity, as well as associations between school-level characteristics and physical activity opportunities provided.

Methods: Survey data was collected from 162 elementary schools participating in the NFL PLAY 60 FitnessGram Project during the 2022-2023 school year. A WOS index (ranging from 0 to 12) was created from responses by school staff on questions about 6 physical activity practices (physical education, recess, before- and after-school programs, classroom-based approaches, active transport). Multivariable regression models examined associations between school characteristics and WOS index scores. Analyses were completed in Spring 2024.

Results: Fully adjusted models indicated a statistically significant difference between the percentage of economically disadvantaged students served and WOS index score. Schools serving between 20% and 39% (p<0.001), 40%-59% (p<0.01), 60%-79% (p<0.01) and ≥80% (p<0.001) economically disadvantaged students scored significantly lower on the WOS index compared to schools with 0%-19% economically disadvantaged students.

Conclusions: Studies are needed to examine disparities in physical activity practices consistent with a WOS approach to understand the implications on health, academic performance, and other key outcomes. This information can inform the development of strategies to address disparities and ensure youth have equitable access to school-based physical activity opportunities.

导言:学校可以通过提供符合 "全校参与"(Whole-of-School,WOS)方法的机会来支持学生参加体育锻炼;然而,体育锻炼机会的提供程度以及学校层面的特征与体育锻炼机会的使用之间的关系仍不清楚。本研究探讨了小学如何使用 "全校参与 "方法来促进体育锻炼,以及学校层面的特征与所提供的体育锻炼机会之间的关联:在 2022-23 学年期间,从 162 所参与 NFL PLAY 60 FitnessGram 项目的小学收集了调查数据。根据学校教职员工对六项体育活动实践(体育课、课间操、课前和课后项目、基于课堂的方法、主动交通)相关问题的回答,创建了WOS指数(范围为0-12)。多变量回归模型检验了学校特征与 WOS 指数得分之间的关联。分析于 2024 年春季完成:完全调整后的模型显示,所服务的经济困难学生比例与 WOS 指数得分之间存在显著的统计学差异。服务比例在 20%-39% 之间的学校(p 结论:需要开展研究,以了解经济贫困学生在学校教育中的差异:需要开展研究,检查与 WOS 方法一致的体育活动实践中的差异,以了解其对健康、学业成绩和其他主要结果的影响。这些信息可以为制定消除差异的策略提供参考,并确保青少年能够公平地获得校内体育活动机会。
{"title":"Whole-of-School Physical Activity Promotion: Findings From Elementary Schools in the United States.","authors":"Derek W Craig, Christopher D Pfledderer, Natalia I Heredia, Kevin Lanza, Kempson Onadeko, Andjelka Pavlovic, Jizyah Injil, Laura F DeFina, Timothy J Walker","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.08.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Schools can support students' participation in physical activity by offering opportunities consistent with a Whole-of-School (WOS) approach; however, the extent to which physical activity opportunities are provided and how school-level characteristics associate with their use remains unclear. This study examined how elementary schools' use a WOS approach to promote physical activity, as well as associations between school-level characteristics and physical activity opportunities provided.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Survey data was collected from 162 elementary schools participating in the NFL PLAY 60 FitnessGram Project during the 2022-2023 school year. A WOS index (ranging from 0 to 12) was created from responses by school staff on questions about 6 physical activity practices (physical education, recess, before- and after-school programs, classroom-based approaches, active transport). Multivariable regression models examined associations between school characteristics and WOS index scores. Analyses were completed in Spring 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fully adjusted models indicated a statistically significant difference between the percentage of economically disadvantaged students served and WOS index score. Schools serving between 20% and 39% (p<0.001), 40%-59% (p<0.01), 60%-79% (p<0.01) and ≥80% (p<0.001) economically disadvantaged students scored significantly lower on the WOS index compared to schools with 0%-19% economically disadvantaged students.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Studies are needed to examine disparities in physical activity practices consistent with a WOS approach to understand the implications on health, academic performance, and other key outcomes. This information can inform the development of strategies to address disparities and ensure youth have equitable access to school-based physical activity opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"960-967"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585414/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141917941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multimorbidity Trajectories from Early to Middle Adulthood and Physical Activity. 从成年早期到成年中期的多病症轨迹与体育活动。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.003
Erin E Dooley, C Barrett Bowling, Bjoern Hornikel, Baojiang Chen, Sylvia E Badon, Cora E Lewis, Kelley Pettee Gabriel

Introduction: Multimorbidity is associated with lower physical function in older adults. Less is known about multimorbidity and physical activity earlier in the life-course. This study examined multimorbidity trajectories across adulthood with physical activity and explores if multimorbidity accelerates age-related activity decline.

Methods: Data are from Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA), an ongoing prospective cohort of participants recruited when they were 18-30 years old. Six multimorbidity trajectories from baseline (1985-86) through year 30 follow-up exam (2015-16; ages 48-60) were based on age of disease onset and rate of accumulating additional conditions: mid-20s-fast, mid-20s-slow, late-20s-slow, mid-30s-fast, mid-40s-fast, and early-50s-slow. Activity was device-measured at year 30 and year 35 (2021-23; ages 53-65). Multivariable linear models were used to estimate differences in activity by multimorbidity trajectory at year 30 and change (%) from year 30 to year 35. Data were collected through June 2023 and analyzed in May 2024.

Results: The sample included 1,425 CARDIA adults at year 30 (mean age 55.1 years) with 749 (mean age 61.3 years) wearing the device again at year 35. Compared with early-50s-slow, mid-20s-slow (β=-14.1, 95%CI: -24.6, -3.6) and mid-30s-fast (β=-14.2, 95%CI: -26.2, -2.2) had lower LPA and mid-20s-fast (β=-5.1, 95%CI: -9.6, -0.6) and late-20s-fast (β=-9.5, 95%CI: -14.1, -4.9) had lower MVPA. No significant differences in 5-year behavior change across multimorbidity trajectories.

Conclusions: Early onset and faster accumulation of chronic conditions was associated with lower activity in midlife. Lower intensity activity for people with multimorbidity may be a feasible target for healthy aging.

导言多病与老年人身体功能低下有关。人们对多病症与生命早期的体育活动知之甚少。本研究考察了成年期多病与体力活动的轨迹,并探讨了多病是否会加速与年龄相关的体力活动下降:方法:数据来自年轻人冠状动脉风险发展(CARDIA),这是一个持续性的前瞻性队列,参与者在 18-30 岁时被招募。从基线(1985-86 年)到第 30 年随访检查(2015-16 年;48-60 岁)期间,根据发病年龄和附加病症的累积速度,划分出六种多病轨迹:20 多岁-快、20 多岁-慢、20 多岁-晚、30 多岁-快、40 多岁-快和 50 多岁-慢。在第 30 年和第 35 年(2021-23 年;53-65 岁)用设备测量活动量。使用多变量线性模型估算第 30 年多病轨迹活动量的差异以及第 30 年到第 35 年的变化(%)。数据收集至 2023 年 6 月,分析至 2024 年 5 月:样本包括第 30 年的 1,425 名 CARDIA 成年人(平均年龄 55.1 岁)和第 35 年再次佩戴设备的 749 人(平均年龄 61.3 岁)。与 50 年代初-慢速相比,20 年代中期-慢速(β=-14.1,95%CI:-24.6,-3.6)和 30 年代中期-快速(β=-14.2,95%CI:-26.2,-2.2)的 LPA 较低,20 年代中期-快速(β=-5.1,95%CI:-9.6,-0.6)和 20 年代后期-快速(β=-9.5,95%CI:-14.1,-4.9)的 MVPA 较低。不同多发病轨迹的 5 年行为变化无明显差异:结论:慢性病发病早、积累快与中年活动量较低有关。多病人群较低强度的活动可能是健康老龄化的一个可行目标。
{"title":"Multimorbidity Trajectories from Early to Middle Adulthood and Physical Activity.","authors":"Erin E Dooley, C Barrett Bowling, Bjoern Hornikel, Baojiang Chen, Sylvia E Badon, Cora E Lewis, Kelley Pettee Gabriel","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multimorbidity is associated with lower physical function in older adults. Less is known about multimorbidity and physical activity earlier in the life-course. This study examined multimorbidity trajectories across adulthood with physical activity and explores if multimorbidity accelerates age-related activity decline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA), an ongoing prospective cohort of participants recruited when they were 18-30 years old. Six multimorbidity trajectories from baseline (1985-86) through year 30 follow-up exam (2015-16; ages 48-60) were based on age of disease onset and rate of accumulating additional conditions: mid-20s-fast, mid-20s-slow, late-20s-slow, mid-30s-fast, mid-40s-fast, and early-50s-slow. Activity was device-measured at year 30 and year 35 (2021-23; ages 53-65). Multivariable linear models were used to estimate differences in activity by multimorbidity trajectory at year 30 and change (%) from year 30 to year 35. Data were collected through June 2023 and analyzed in May 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 1,425 CARDIA adults at year 30 (mean age 55.1 years) with 749 (mean age 61.3 years) wearing the device again at year 35. Compared with early-50s-slow, mid-20s-slow (β=-14.1, 95%CI: -24.6, -3.6) and mid-30s-fast (β=-14.2, 95%CI: -26.2, -2.2) had lower LPA and mid-20s-fast (β=-5.1, 95%CI: -9.6, -0.6) and late-20s-fast (β=-9.5, 95%CI: -14.1, -4.9) had lower MVPA. No significant differences in 5-year behavior change across multimorbidity trajectories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early onset and faster accumulation of chronic conditions was associated with lower activity in midlife. Lower intensity activity for people with multimorbidity may be a feasible target for healthy aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142693851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
New Family Planning Recommendations Centered on Advancing Equity for All. 以促进人人公平为中心的计划生育新建议。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.006
Jessica Swafford Marcella
{"title":"New Family Planning Recommendations Centered on Advancing Equity for All.","authors":"Jessica Swafford Marcella","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142683284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quit attempts and use of cessation aids among US adults who smoke non-daily. 美国非每日吸烟成年人的戒烟尝试和戒烟辅助工具的使用情况。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.004
Daniela S Gutiérrez-Torres, Carolyn Reyes-Guzman, Margaret Mayer, Yvonne M Prutzman, Neal D Freedman

Introduction: About 25% of people who currently smoke cigarettes in the United States (US) smoke non-daily, and relatively little is known about their intentions or attempts to quit. Active surveillance is essential to identify services needed to support smoking cessation efforts and reduce the burden of disease.

Methods: US population-wide estimates of quit attempts and use of cessation aids among adults who smoke cigarettes were calculated using data from the September 2022 wave of the Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey. Statistical analyses were conducted in 2024. Weighted percentages and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) are presented by sociodemographic characteristics and smoking pattern.

Results: In 2022, nearly 6 million adults (2.59 million women, 3.36 million men) in the US reported smoking non-daily an average of 13.4 days per month (95%CI:12.7-14.1). Compared with adults who smoke daily, the proportion of past-year quit attempts was higher among people who reported smoking on some days of the month (always some days: 41.8%; formerly daily: 58.4%; daily: 32.2%). However, those who smoke some days were less likely to report receiving medical advice to quit (always some days: 49.5%; formerly daily: 58.1%; daily: 72.7%), using pharmacotherapy such as nicotine replacement therapy or a prescribed medication (always some days: 17.9%; formerly daily: 32.4%; daily: 38.7%), or receiving counseling to quit smoking (always some days: 5.8%; formerly daily: 6.9%; daily: 12.0%).

Conclusions: Given the substantial number of adults who smoke non-daily in the US and their interest in quitting, developing targeted interventions and communication is an important public health priority.

导言:美国目前约有 25% 的吸烟者并非每天吸烟,而人们对他们的戒烟意愿或戒烟尝试知之甚少。积极的监测对于确定支持戒烟努力和减少疾病负担所需的服务至关重要:方法:利用《当前人口调查烟草使用补充资料》2022 年 9 月的数据,计算了美国全人口中吸烟成人的戒烟尝试和使用戒烟辅助工具的估计值。统计分析于 2024 年进行。按社会人口特征和吸烟模式列出了加权百分比和 95% 置信区间 (95%CI):2022 年,美国有近 600 万成年人(259 万女性,336 万男性)表示每月平均有 13.4 天(95%CI:12.7-14.1)非每天吸烟。与每天吸烟的成年人相比,每月有几天吸烟的人在过去一年中尝试戒烟的比例更高(总是有几天吸烟:41.8%;以前每天吸烟:58.4%;每天吸烟:32.2%)。然而,在某些日子吸烟的人群中,接受戒烟医学建议(总是某些日子:49.5%;以前每天:58.1%;每天:72.7%)、使用尼古丁替代疗法或处方药等药物疗法(总是某些日子:17.9%;以前每天:32.4%;每天:38.7%)或接受戒烟咨询(总是某些日子:5.8%;以前每天:6.9%;每天:12.0%)的比例较低:鉴于美国非每天吸烟的成年人人数众多,而且他们对戒烟很感兴趣,因此制定有针对性的干预措施和进行宣传是公共卫生工作的重中之重。
{"title":"Quit attempts and use of cessation aids among US adults who smoke non-daily.","authors":"Daniela S Gutiérrez-Torres, Carolyn Reyes-Guzman, Margaret Mayer, Yvonne M Prutzman, Neal D Freedman","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>About 25% of people who currently smoke cigarettes in the United States (US) smoke non-daily, and relatively little is known about their intentions or attempts to quit. Active surveillance is essential to identify services needed to support smoking cessation efforts and reduce the burden of disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>US population-wide estimates of quit attempts and use of cessation aids among adults who smoke cigarettes were calculated using data from the September 2022 wave of the Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey. Statistical analyses were conducted in 2024. Weighted percentages and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) are presented by sociodemographic characteristics and smoking pattern.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2022, nearly 6 million adults (2.59 million women, 3.36 million men) in the US reported smoking non-daily an average of 13.4 days per month (95%CI:12.7-14.1). Compared with adults who smoke daily, the proportion of past-year quit attempts was higher among people who reported smoking on some days of the month (always some days: 41.8%; formerly daily: 58.4%; daily: 32.2%). However, those who smoke some days were less likely to report receiving medical advice to quit (always some days: 49.5%; formerly daily: 58.1%; daily: 72.7%), using pharmacotherapy such as nicotine replacement therapy or a prescribed medication (always some days: 17.9%; formerly daily: 32.4%; daily: 38.7%), or receiving counseling to quit smoking (always some days: 5.8%; formerly daily: 6.9%; daily: 12.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the substantial number of adults who smoke non-daily in the US and their interest in quitting, developing targeted interventions and communication is an important public health priority.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142689574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Providing Quality Family Planning Services in the United States: Recommendations of the U.S. Office of Population Affairs (Revised 2024). 在美国提供优质计划生育服务:美国人口事务办公室的建议》(2024 年修订版)。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.007
Sarah E Romer, Jennifer Blum, Sonya Borrero, Jacqueline M Crowley, Jamie Hart, Maggie M Magee, Jamie L Manzer, Lisa Stern

This update, titled Providing Quality Family Planning Servicesa in the United States: Recommendations of the U.S. Office of Population Affairs (Revised 2024), provides recommendations developed by the Office of Population Affairs (OPA) within the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). These recommendations represent an update to Providing Quality Family Planning (QFP) Services: Recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Office of Population Affairs (OPA), originally published in 2014. The updated recommendations outline how to provide quality sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services for people of reproductive age but can also be used to guide the care of people of any age when the content is relevant to their needs, including family-building services, contraception, pregnancy testing and counseling, early pregnancy management, sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention and testing services, and other preventive health services. The recommendations aim to enable health care providers with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to ensure that all people, regardless of individual characteristics such as sex, sexual orientation and gender identity, age, disability, or race, can have their SRH needs met. The primary audience for these recommendations is providers and potential providers of SRH services to people of reproductive age, such as providers working in clinical settings dedicated to SRH service delivery, including those funded by the Title X family planning programb as well as primary care providers and other subspecialty providers who may identify SRH needs and make referrals. During the past decade, several changes have taken place in the United States that have affected SRH care delivery, including technological advances, recognition of long-standing inequities, and other legal and regulatory changes. This broader context has been considered in designing the updated recommendations. This update of the QFP aims to provide guidance on the provision of person-centered SRH care focused on individuals' needs, values, and preferences. The update offers specific recommendations for how to provide high-quality SRH care and connects users to relevant guidelines, primary research, and other resources to inform best practices. In addition to incorporating new evidence, this update incorporates newer approaches to care, including adopting a health equity lens that recognizes the impact of structural and interpersonal racism, classism, ableism, and bias based on sexual orientation and/or gender identity on health and the provision of quality SRH care. OPA will update these QFP recommendations periodically to reflect new findings in the scientific literature and revisions to the clinical guidelines referenced in this update.

本更新题为《在美国提供优质的计划生育服务a 》:美国人口事务办公室的建议(2024 年修订版)》提供了美国卫生与公众服务部(HHS)卫生事务助理部长办公室下属人口事务办公室(OPA)制定的建议。这些建议是对《提供优质计划生育 (QFP) 服务》的更新:提供优质计划生育(QFP)服务:疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)和美国人口事务办公室(OPA)的建议》的更新版。更新后的建议概述了如何为育龄人群提供优质的性与生殖健康(SRH)服务,但也可用于指导任何年龄段人群的护理,只要内容与他们的需求相关,包括家庭建设服务、避孕、妊娠检测和咨询、早孕管理、性传播感染(STI)和人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)预防和检测服务以及其他预防性健康服务。这些建议旨在使医疗服务提供者掌握相关知识、技能和态度,确保所有人,无论其性别、性取向和性别认同、年龄、残疾或种族等个人特征如何,都能满足其性健康和生殖健康需求。这些建议的主要受众是为育龄人群提供性健康和生殖健康服务的提供者和潜在提供者,如在专门提供性健康和生殖健康服务的临床环境中工作的提供者,包括那些由第十章计划生育计划b 资助的提供者,以及可能识别性健康和生殖健康需求并进行转诊的初级保健提供者和其他亚专业提供者。在过去的十年中,美国发生了一些影响性健康和生殖健康服务提供的变化,包括技术进步、对长期存在的不公平现象的认识以及其他法律法规的变化。在设计更新的建议时,考虑到了这一更广泛的背景。本 QFP 的更新旨在为提供以人为本、注重个人需求、价值观和偏好的性健康和生殖健康护理提供指导。更新版就如何提供高质量的性健康和生殖健康护理提出了具体建议,并将用户与相关指南、基础研究和其他资源联系起来,为最佳实践提供参考。除纳入新证据外,本次更新还纳入了更新的护理方法,包括采用健康公平视角,承认结构性和人际种族主义、阶级歧视、能力歧视以及基于性取向和/或性别认同的偏见对健康和提供优质性健康和生殖健康护理的影响。两性平等办公室将定期更新这些 QFP 建议,以反映科学文献中的新发现和本更新中参考的临床指南的修订。
{"title":"Providing Quality Family Planning Services in the United States: Recommendations of the U.S. Office of Population Affairs (Revised 2024).","authors":"Sarah E Romer, Jennifer Blum, Sonya Borrero, Jacqueline M Crowley, Jamie Hart, Maggie M Magee, Jamie L Manzer, Lisa Stern","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This update, titled Providing Quality Family Planning Services<sup>a</sup> in the United States: Recommendations of the U.S. Office of Population Affairs (Revised 2024), provides recommendations developed by the Office of Population Affairs (OPA) within the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). These recommendations represent an update to Providing Quality Family Planning (QFP) Services: Recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Office of Population Affairs (OPA), originally published in 2014. The updated recommendations outline how to provide quality sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services for people of reproductive age but can also be used to guide the care of people of any age when the content is relevant to their needs, including family-building services, contraception, pregnancy testing and counseling, early pregnancy management, sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention and testing services, and other preventive health services. The recommendations aim to enable health care providers with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to ensure that all people, regardless of individual characteristics such as sex, sexual orientation and gender identity, age, disability, or race, can have their SRH needs met. The primary audience for these recommendations is providers and potential providers of SRH services to people of reproductive age, such as providers working in clinical settings dedicated to SRH service delivery, including those funded by the Title X family planning program<sup>b</sup> as well as primary care providers and other subspecialty providers who may identify SRH needs and make referrals. During the past decade, several changes have taken place in the United States that have affected SRH care delivery, including technological advances, recognition of long-standing inequities, and other legal and regulatory changes. This broader context has been considered in designing the updated recommendations. This update of the QFP aims to provide guidance on the provision of person-centered SRH care focused on individuals' needs, values, and preferences. The update offers specific recommendations for how to provide high-quality SRH care and connects users to relevant guidelines, primary research, and other resources to inform best practices. In addition to incorporating new evidence, this update incorporates newer approaches to care, including adopting a health equity lens that recognizes the impact of structural and interpersonal racism, classism, ableism, and bias based on sexual orientation and/or gender identity on health and the provision of quality SRH care. OPA will update these QFP recommendations periodically to reflect new findings in the scientific literature and revisions to the clinical guidelines referenced in this update.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142683306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Phosphatidylethanol Can Improve Detection and Treatment of Unhealthy Alcohol Use. 磷脂酰乙醇可改善对不健康饮酒的检测和治疗。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.002
Judith A Hahn, Mariann R Piano, Chueh-Lung Hwang, Amy C Justice
{"title":"Phosphatidylethanol Can Improve Detection and Treatment of Unhealthy Alcohol Use.","authors":"Judith A Hahn, Mariann R Piano, Chueh-Lung Hwang, Amy C Justice","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142639932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patterns of Emerging Tobacco Product Use Among U.S. Adults, 2019-2022. 2019-2022年美国成年人使用新兴烟草产品的模式。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.001
Carolyn M Reyes-Guzman, Laura Baker, Haley Goss-Holmes, Michele H Bloch

Introduction: Quantifying the use of emerging tobacco products such as nicotine pouches (NPs) and heated tobacco products (HTPs) is crucial for informing public health interventions and measuring their potential effects on tobacco use morbidity, mortality and benefits from complete tobacco cessation.

Methods: Using data from the May 2019 and September 2022 cycles of the Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS), we calculated U.S. population-wide estimates of ever and/or current use of NPs and HTPs by key socio-demographic characteristics, cigarette smoking status and preference of characterizing flavors in NPs. We present weighted frequencies, proportions and associated 95% confidence intervals. Analyses were conducted in 2024.

Results: In both survey cycles, a substantial fraction of adults who ever used HTPs had never smoked cigarettes (52.0% in 2019; 27.4% in 2022). Among those who currently used HTPs or NPs (2022 only), many reported having never smoked cigarettes (42.5% and 41.4%, respectively), while many also reported currently smoking (32.2% and 24.8%, respectively). We observed similar sociodemographic characteristics across use of both HTPs and NPs. Mint was the most common flavor choice among adults who currently used NPs (52.8%).

Conclusions: Continued surveillance of emerging tobacco products such as HTPs and NPs can inform public health approaches and support future research to better quantify the health consequences from these products.

导言:量化尼古丁袋(NPs)和加热烟草制品(HTPs)等新兴烟草制品的使用情况对于为公共卫生干预措施提供信息以及衡量其对烟草使用发病率、死亡率和完全戒烟益处的潜在影响至关重要:利用2019年5月和2022年9月的美国当前人口调查烟草使用补充调查(TUS-CPS)数据,我们按主要社会人口特征、吸烟状况和对烟草制品特征口味的偏好计算了美国全人口曾经和/或当前使用NPs和HTPs的估计值。我们列出了加权频率、比例和相关的 95% 置信区间。分析于 2024 年进行:在这两个调查周期中,曾经使用过 HTPs 的成年人中有相当一部分从未吸过烟(2019 年为 52.0%;2022 年为 27.4%)。在目前使用 HTPs 或 NPs 的人群中(仅 2022 年),许多人表示从未吸过烟(分别为 42.5% 和 41.4%),而许多人也表示目前正在吸烟(分别为 32.2% 和 24.8%)。我们观察到使用 HTPs 和 NPs 的人群具有相似的社会人口特征。在目前使用 NPs 的成年人中,薄荷是最常见的口味选择(52.8%):对 HTPs 和 NPs 等新兴烟草制品的持续监测可为公共卫生方法提供信息,并支持未来的研究,以更好地量化这些产品对健康造成的影响。
{"title":"Patterns of Emerging Tobacco Product Use Among U.S. Adults, 2019-2022.","authors":"Carolyn M Reyes-Guzman, Laura Baker, Haley Goss-Holmes, Michele H Bloch","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quantifying the use of emerging tobacco products such as nicotine pouches (NPs) and heated tobacco products (HTPs) is crucial for informing public health interventions and measuring their potential effects on tobacco use morbidity, mortality and benefits from complete tobacco cessation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the May 2019 and September 2022 cycles of the Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS), we calculated U.S. population-wide estimates of ever and/or current use of NPs and HTPs by key socio-demographic characteristics, cigarette smoking status and preference of characterizing flavors in NPs. We present weighted frequencies, proportions and associated 95% confidence intervals. Analyses were conducted in 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both survey cycles, a substantial fraction of adults who ever used HTPs had never smoked cigarettes (52.0% in 2019; 27.4% in 2022). Among those who currently used HTPs or NPs (2022 only), many reported having never smoked cigarettes (42.5% and 41.4%, respectively), while many also reported currently smoking (32.2% and 24.8%, respectively). We observed similar sociodemographic characteristics across use of both HTPs and NPs. Mint was the most common flavor choice among adults who currently used NPs (52.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continued surveillance of emerging tobacco products such as HTPs and NPs can inform public health approaches and support future research to better quantify the health consequences from these products.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142639930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Effectiveness of Recipe4Health: A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation. Recipe4Health 的有效性:准实验评估。
IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.10.020
Lisa G Rosas, Steven Chen, Lan Xiao, Mike Baiocchi, Elliot Ng, Benjamin O Emmert-Aronson, Wei-Ting Chen, Ariana Thompson-Lastad, Erica Martinez, Josselyn Perez, Eric Melendez, Elizabeth Markle, Marcela D Radtke, June Tester

Introduction: Food as Medicine is increasingly recognized as an important strategy for addressing the related challenges of food insecurity and nutrition-related chronic conditions. Food as Medicine refers to integration of food-based nutrition interventions into healthcare to prevent and treat disease. However, there is limited evidence to understand the effectiveness of Food as Medicine.

Methods: Recipe4Health, a comprehensive Food as Medicine program, was implemented in 4 Federally Qualified Health Centers in California for patients with food insecurity and/or nutrition-related chronic conditions. Patients were referred by a healthcare provider to a 'Food Farmacy' (16 weekly produce home deliveries) alone or in combination with a 'Behavioral Pharmacy' (16 weekly group visits). A quasi-experimental study with pre/post surveys (4 months) and propensity score matched controls for Electronic Health Record (EHR) outcomes over 12 months was conducted. Participants were 2,643 Recipe4Health patients and 2,643 controls identified from 1/2020 to 12/2022; data were analyzed from 2023-2024.

Results: There was a significant increase in produce consumption from baseline to four months (0.41 servings/day [0.11, 0.72], p=0.007) in the Food Farmacy in combination with Behavioral Pharmacy. Compared to controls, there were improvements in non-HDL cholesterol for the Food Farmacy alone (-17.1 mg/dl[-26.9, -7.2], p<0.001) and in combination with Behavioral Pharmacy (-17 mg/dl [-28.3, -5.8], p=0.003) at 12 months. Compared to controls, HbA1c significantly decreased in the Food Farmacy alone at 12 months (-0.37%, 95% CI [-0.65, -0.08]; p=0.01), but not the Food Farmacy with Behavioral Pharmacy.

Conclusions: Recipe4Health resulted in improvements in diet and multiple clinical health outcomes, such as non-HDL cholesterol and HbA1c.

导言:人们日益认识到,"食物即药物 "是应对食物不安全和营养相关慢性病等相关挑战的重要战略。食物即医学是指将食物营养干预措施纳入医疗保健,以预防和治疗疾病。然而,目前了解 "食物即医学 "有效性的证据还很有限:方法:在加利福尼亚州的 4 个联邦合格医疗中心实施了 "健康食谱"(Recipe4Health)这一全面的 "食物即药物 "计划,该计划针对的是食物无保障和/或与营养相关的慢性病患者。患者由医疗服务提供者转介到 "食品农场"(每周 16 次农产品送货上门),或与 "行为药房"(每周 16 次小组探访)相结合。在为期 12 个月的研究中,我们进行了一项准实验研究,对电子健康记录(EHR)结果进行了前后调查(4 个月)和倾向得分匹配对照。研究对象为 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 12 日期间确定的 2,643 名 Recipe4Health 患者和 2,643 名对照组;数据分析期为 2023 年至 2024 年:结果:从基线到四个月期间,"食品农场 "与 "行为药房 "相结合的农产品消费量明显增加(0.41 份/天 [0.11, 0.72],p=0.007)。与对照组相比,"美食农园 "单独使用时,非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇有所改善(-17.1 毫克/分升[-26.9,-7.2],P=0.007):Recipe4Health 改善了饮食和多种临床健康结果,如非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和 HbA1c。
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Recipe4Health: A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation.","authors":"Lisa G Rosas, Steven Chen, Lan Xiao, Mike Baiocchi, Elliot Ng, Benjamin O Emmert-Aronson, Wei-Ting Chen, Ariana Thompson-Lastad, Erica Martinez, Josselyn Perez, Eric Melendez, Elizabeth Markle, Marcela D Radtke, June Tester","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.10.020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.10.020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Food as Medicine is increasingly recognized as an important strategy for addressing the related challenges of food insecurity and nutrition-related chronic conditions. Food as Medicine refers to integration of food-based nutrition interventions into healthcare to prevent and treat disease. However, there is limited evidence to understand the effectiveness of Food as Medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Recipe4Health, a comprehensive Food as Medicine program, was implemented in 4 Federally Qualified Health Centers in California for patients with food insecurity and/or nutrition-related chronic conditions. Patients were referred by a healthcare provider to a 'Food Farmacy' (16 weekly produce home deliveries) alone or in combination with a 'Behavioral Pharmacy' (16 weekly group visits). A quasi-experimental study with pre/post surveys (4 months) and propensity score matched controls for Electronic Health Record (EHR) outcomes over 12 months was conducted. Participants were 2,643 Recipe4Health patients and 2,643 controls identified from 1/2020 to 12/2022; data were analyzed from 2023-2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant increase in produce consumption from baseline to four months (0.41 servings/day [0.11, 0.72], p=0.007) in the Food Farmacy in combination with Behavioral Pharmacy. Compared to controls, there were improvements in non-HDL cholesterol for the Food Farmacy alone (-17.1 mg/dl[-26.9, -7.2], p<0.001) and in combination with Behavioral Pharmacy (-17 mg/dl [-28.3, -5.8], p=0.003) at 12 months. Compared to controls, HbA1c significantly decreased in the Food Farmacy alone at 12 months (-0.37%, 95% CI [-0.65, -0.08]; p=0.01), but not the Food Farmacy with Behavioral Pharmacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recipe4Health resulted in improvements in diet and multiple clinical health outcomes, such as non-HDL cholesterol and HbA1c.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142568725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1