首页 > 最新文献

American Journal of Preventive Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Hypothetical Cigarette Purchasing Behavior: Findings From a Multi-State Rapid-Response Survey in the U.S. 假设的香烟购买行为:来自美国多州快速反应调查的结果
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-01-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108116
Tyler Nighbor PhD , Eva Orr-Souza MPH , Shanshan Wang MPH , Laurel P. Gibson PhD, MPH , Presley Cannon MS, MPH , Nigar Nargis PhD , Minal Patel PhD, MPH

Introduction

Cigarette smoking prevalence is higher (and cigarette cost lower) than the national average in several states within the U.S. Midwest and South (high-tobacco-burden states). In this study, cigarette price sensitivity was investigated among those living in high- versus low-tobacco-burden states using the Cigarette Purchase Task.

Methods

Data came from an American Cancer Society online probability-based rapid-response survey of U.S. adults (aged 18–65 years) collected in April–May 2024 (high-tobacco-burden states, n=4,550; low-tobacco-burden states, n=1,600). Respondents were asked, How many packs of your usual brand of cigarettes would you purchase and consume in the next 7 days at: $2, $4, $6, $8, $10, $12, $14, $16, $18, $20, and $40 per pack? Demand curves and 5 demand indices—intensity (quantity demanded at lowest cost), Omax (maximum expenditure), Pmax (price at Omax), breakpoint (price-suppressing purchases), and alpha (overall price sensitivity)—were compared between high- and low-tobacco-burden states.

Results

Demand was significantly lower in high- than in low-tobacco-burden states at prices >$6 per pack (all ps<0.001), as were Omax (maximum expenditure, $42.82 vs $50.37, p=0.001), Pmax (price at Omax, $7.76 vs $10.24, p<0.001) and breakpoint (price suppressing purchases, $13.03 vs $17.14, p<0.001). Individuals in high-tobacco-burden states had overall higher alpha (sensitivity to changes in prices, 0.00499 vs 0.00389, p<0.001). No significant differences were observed for intensity.

Conclusions

Cigarette smoking in high-tobacco-burden states may be suppressed by increasing cigarette prices to approximately $13 per pack.
在美国中西部和南部的几个州(高烟草负担州),吸烟率高于全国平均水平(而卷烟成本较低)。在这项研究中,使用卷烟购买任务调查了生活在高烟草负担州和低烟草负担州的人对卷烟价格的敏感性。数据来自美国癌症协会于2024年4月至5月对美国成年人(18-65岁)进行的基于概率的在线快速反应调查(高烟草负担州,n=4,550;低烟草负担州,n=1,600)。受访者被问及:在未来7天内,你会以每包2美元、4美元、6美元、8美元、10美元、12美元、14美元、16美元、18美元、20美元和40美元的价格购买和消费多少包你常用品牌的香烟?需求曲线和5个需求指标——强度(最低成本下的需求量)、Omax(最大支出)、Pmax(在Omax时的价格)、断点(价格抑制购买)和alpha(总体价格敏感性)——在高烟草负担和低烟草负担状态之间进行了比较。结果烟草负担高的州在每包6美元的价格上的需求明显低于烟草负担低的州(p < 0.001), Omax(最大支出,42.82美元对50.37美元,p=0.001)、Pmax (Omax价格,7.76美元对10.24美元,p < 0.001)和断点(价格抑制购买,13.03美元对17.14美元,p < 0.001)也是如此。高烟草负担州的个体总体上具有更高的alpha值(对价格变化的敏感性,0.00499 vs 0.00389, p<0.001)。强度无显著差异。结论:将卷烟价格提高到每包13美元左右可以抑制高烟草负担州的吸烟行为。
{"title":"Hypothetical Cigarette Purchasing Behavior: Findings From a Multi-State Rapid-Response Survey in the U.S.","authors":"Tyler Nighbor PhD ,&nbsp;Eva Orr-Souza MPH ,&nbsp;Shanshan Wang MPH ,&nbsp;Laurel P. Gibson PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Presley Cannon MS, MPH ,&nbsp;Nigar Nargis PhD ,&nbsp;Minal Patel PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108116","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108116","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Cigarette smoking prevalence is higher (and cigarette cost lower) than the national average in several states within the U.S. Midwest and South (high-tobacco-burden states). In this study, cigarette price sensitivity was investigated among those living in high- versus low-tobacco-burden states using the Cigarette Purchase Task.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data came from an American Cancer Society online probability-based rapid-response survey of U.S. adults (aged 18–65 years) collected in April–May 2024 (high-tobacco-burden states, <em>n</em>=4,550; low-tobacco-burden states, <em>n</em>=1,600). Respondents were asked, <em>How many packs of your usual brand of cigarettes would you purchase and consume in the next 7 days at: $2, $4, $6, $8, $10, $12, $14, $16, $18, $20, and $40 per pack?</em> Demand curves and 5 demand indices—intensity (quantity demanded at lowest cost), <em>O</em>max (maximum expenditure), <em>P</em>max (price at <em>O</em>max), breakpoint (price-suppressing purchases), and alpha (overall price sensitivity)—were compared between high- and low-tobacco-burden states.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Demand was significantly lower in high- than in low-tobacco-burden states at prices &gt;$6 per pack (all <em>p</em>s&lt;0.001), as were <em>O</em>max (maximum expenditure, $42.82 vs $50.37, <em>p</em>=0.001), <em>P</em>max (price at <em>O</em>max, $7.76 vs $10.24, <em>p</em>&lt;0.001) and breakpoint (price suppressing purchases, $13.03 vs $17.14, <em>p</em>&lt;0.001). Individuals in high-tobacco-burden states had overall higher alpha (sensitivity to changes in prices, 0.00499 vs 0.00389, <em>p</em>&lt;0.001). No significant differences were observed for intensity<em>.</em></div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Cigarette smoking in high-tobacco-burden states may be suppressed by increasing cigarette prices to approximately $13 per pack.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":"70 2","pages":"Article 108116"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146048943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence, Patterns, and Correlates of Cannabis–Cigarette Co-Use: Findings From a Multi-State Rapid-Response Survey in the U.S., 2023–2024 大麻和香烟共同使用的患病率、模式和相关性:来自美国多州快速反应调查的结果,2023-2024
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-01-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108114
Zheng Xue MSPH , Laurel P. Gibson PhD, MPH , Tyler Nighbor PhD , Nigar Nargis PhD , J. Lee Westmaas PhD , Minal Patel PhD, MPH

Introduction

Cannabis use prevalence is significantly higher among people who smoke cigarettes, and there may be additive health risks associated with cannabis and cigarette co-use. Little is known about co-use, especially in states with already elevated cigarette smoking rates (high-tobacco-burden states).

Methods

Data were from an online rapid-response survey of a probability sample of 9,100 adults (aged 18–65 years) in 13 high-tobacco-burden states collected in 2023 and 2024 and analyzed in 2025. The weighted prevalence of co-use was calculated, and weighted logistic regressions examined sociodemographic correlates and patterns of cannabis and cigarette use.

Results

The prevalence of co-use was 8.7% in high-tobacco-burden states, with 45.0% of individuals who currently smoked cigarettes reporting concurrent cannabis use versus 24.5% and 12.3% of individuals who formerly and never smoked, respectively. Individuals who co-used reported smoking 12.8 cigarettes per day on average and using cannabis 18.9 days on average in the past 30 days, similar to cigarettes per day among individuals who exclusively smoked (13.2 cigarettes per day) or to cannabis use among individuals who exclusively used cannabis (18.2 days). Individuals who currently smoked cigarettes were more likely to co-use if they identified as male, were younger (aged 18–24 years), were non-Hispanic Black, were single, or reported a mental or physical disability.

Conclusions

Cannabis use was significantly higher among adults who currently smoked cigarettes than among those who never smoked. Increased monitoring of cannabis and cigarette co-use will be an important component of tobacco control efforts in high-tobacco-burden states, especially among at-risk population subgroups.
在吸烟人群中使用大麻的流行率要高得多,并且可能存在与大麻和香烟共同使用相关的附加健康风险。人们对共同使用知之甚少,特别是在吸烟率已经升高的州(高烟草负担州)。数据来自一项在线快速反应调查,该调查是在2023年和2024年收集的13个高烟草负担州的9100名成年人(18-65岁)的概率样本,并于2025年进行分析。计算了共同使用的加权患病率,加权逻辑回归检查了大麻和香烟使用的社会人口学相关性和模式。结果在高烟草负担州,共同使用的患病率为8.7%,目前吸烟的人中有45.0%报告同时使用大麻,而以前和从不吸烟的人中分别有24.5%和12.3%报告同时使用大麻。共同使用者报告称,在过去30天内,平均每天吸12.8支烟,平均使用大麻18.9天,与完全吸烟者(每天13.2支)的每天吸烟量或完全使用大麻的个人(18.2天)相似。目前吸烟的人更有可能同时吸烟,如果他们是男性,年龄较小(18-24岁),非西班牙裔黑人,单身,或报告有精神或身体残疾。结论目前吸烟的成年人使用大麻的比例明显高于从未吸烟的成年人。加强对大麻和卷烟同时使用情况的监测将是烟草负担高的国家,特别是高危人群中烟草控制工作的一个重要组成部分。
{"title":"Prevalence, Patterns, and Correlates of Cannabis–Cigarette Co-Use: Findings From a Multi-State Rapid-Response Survey in the U.S., 2023–2024","authors":"Zheng Xue MSPH ,&nbsp;Laurel P. Gibson PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Tyler Nighbor PhD ,&nbsp;Nigar Nargis PhD ,&nbsp;J. Lee Westmaas PhD ,&nbsp;Minal Patel PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108114","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108114","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Cannabis use prevalence is significantly higher among people who smoke cigarettes, and there may be additive health risks associated with cannabis and cigarette co-use. Little is known about co-use, especially in states with already elevated cigarette smoking rates (high-tobacco-burden states).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were from an online rapid-response survey of a probability sample of 9,100 adults (aged 18–65 years) in 13 high-tobacco-burden states collected in 2023 and 2024 and analyzed in 2025. The weighted prevalence of co-use was calculated, and weighted logistic regressions examined sociodemographic correlates and patterns of cannabis and cigarette use.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The prevalence of co-use was 8.7% in high-tobacco-burden states, with 45.0% of individuals who currently smoked cigarettes reporting concurrent cannabis use versus 24.5% and 12.3% of individuals who formerly and never smoked, respectively. Individuals who co-used reported smoking 12.8 cigarettes per day on average and using cannabis 18.9 days on average in the past 30 days, similar to cigarettes per day among individuals who exclusively smoked (13.2 cigarettes per day) or to cannabis use among individuals who exclusively used cannabis (18.2 days). Individuals who currently smoked cigarettes were more likely to co-use if they identified as male, were younger (aged 18–24 years), were non-Hispanic Black, were single, or reported a mental or physical disability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Cannabis use was significantly higher among adults who currently smoked cigarettes than among those who never smoked. Increased monitoring of cannabis and cigarette co-use will be an important component of tobacco control efforts in high-tobacco-burden states, especially among at-risk population subgroups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":"70 2","pages":"Article 108114"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146048946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Texas' 2021 Ban on Abortions and Changes in Obstetrician-Gynecologist Salaries. 德克萨斯州2021年的堕胎禁令和妇产科医生工资的变化。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-01-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108279
Olesya Baker, Stephanie Argetsinger, Anjali Kaimal, Carrie Cochran-McClain, Rebecca Costa, Fang Zhang, Hao Yu
{"title":"Texas' 2021 Ban on Abortions and Changes in Obstetrician-Gynecologist Salaries.","authors":"Olesya Baker, Stephanie Argetsinger, Anjali Kaimal, Carrie Cochran-McClain, Rebecca Costa, Fang Zhang, Hao Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108279","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108279"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146047099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of AI Multi-model Responses and Evaluations for PEP Guidelines. 人工智能多模型响应与PEP指南评价分析。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-01-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108283
Jiayu Xie, Wenpeng Song, Yifan Hu
{"title":"Analysis of AI Multi-model Responses and Evaluations for PEP Guidelines.","authors":"Jiayu Xie, Wenpeng Song, Yifan Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108283","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108283","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108283"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146047090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sugar-sweetened beverage warning labels and taxes: simulated impacts when considering implementation. 含糖饮料警告标签和税收:考虑实施时的模拟影响。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-01-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108278
Natalie Riva Smith, Jennifer L Cruz, Anna H Grummon, Shu Wen Ng, Marissa G Hall, Leah Frerichs, Kristen Hassmiller Lich

Introduction: Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) warning label and excise tax policies hold promise for preventing type 2 diabetes. Population-level impacts of SSB policies have been projected using simulation models, but the authors are unaware of any assessing the effect of warning labels on type 2 diabetes (T2D), or the effects of warning label and tax effects using the same modeling assumptions. Simulation models have also rarely considered how policy implementation factors such as design and sustainment affect policy outcomes.

Methods: Microsimulation model of T2D development in a closed cohort of US adults aged 18-64 over 10 years with 1200 replications. The model was developed using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017-18, US Diabetes Surveillance System, and published literature. Policy implementation scenarios were modeled in 2025 for warning label (design: graphic or text warning label) and tax (sustainment: $0.02/fluid ounce excise tax sustained or repealed) policies, compared to the status quo.

Results: Relative to the status quo, a graphic warning label was estimated to avert 945,000 cases of T2D over 10 years (95% UI=442,000, 1,820,000) as compared to 480,000 (147,000, 1,140,000) cases averted under a text warning label. A $0.02/fluid ounce excise tax was estimated to avert 1,260,000 (646,000, 2,160,000) cases of T2D over 10 years. If repealed after 1 year, the policy would only avert 78,000 (0, 469,000) cases of T2D.

Conclusions: SSB policies may be an approach to meaningfully decrease the number of individuals with T2D. Policy design and sustainment drive the magnitude of effects.

含糖饮料(SSB)的警告标签和消费税政策有望预防2型糖尿病。使用模拟模型预测了SSB政策对人口水平的影响,但作者没有意识到任何评估警告标签对2型糖尿病(T2D)的影响,或者使用相同的建模假设来评估警告标签和税收效应的影响。仿真模型也很少考虑政策实施因素(如设计和维持)如何影响政策结果。方法:在美国18-64岁成年人的封闭队列中建立T2D发展的微观模拟模型,时间超过10年,重复1200次。该模型是根据2017-18年国家健康和营养检查调查、美国糖尿病监测系统和已发表的文献开发的。与现状相比,2025年的政策实施情景为警告标签(设计:图形或文字警告标签)和税收(维持:维持或废除0.02美元/液盎司消费税)政策建模。结果:相对于现状,估计在10年内,图形警告标签避免了945,000例T2D (95% UI=442,000, 1,820,000),而文本警告标签避免了480,000例(147,000,1,140,000)例。每液盎司0.02美元的消费税估计可在10年内避免1,260万例(64.6万,2,160万)例T2D病例。如果在一年后废除,该政策只能避免78,000例(0,469,000例)T2D病例。结论:SSB政策可能是有效减少t2dm患者数量的一种方法。政策设计和维持决定了效果的大小。
{"title":"Sugar-sweetened beverage warning labels and taxes: simulated impacts when considering implementation.","authors":"Natalie Riva Smith, Jennifer L Cruz, Anna H Grummon, Shu Wen Ng, Marissa G Hall, Leah Frerichs, Kristen Hassmiller Lich","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108278","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108278","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) warning label and excise tax policies hold promise for preventing type 2 diabetes. Population-level impacts of SSB policies have been projected using simulation models, but the authors are unaware of any assessing the effect of warning labels on type 2 diabetes (T2D), or the effects of warning label and tax effects using the same modeling assumptions. Simulation models have also rarely considered how policy implementation factors such as design and sustainment affect policy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Microsimulation model of T2D development in a closed cohort of US adults aged 18-64 over 10 years with 1200 replications. The model was developed using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017-18, US Diabetes Surveillance System, and published literature. Policy implementation scenarios were modeled in 2025 for warning label (design: graphic or text warning label) and tax (sustainment: $0.02/fluid ounce excise tax sustained or repealed) policies, compared to the status quo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative to the status quo, a graphic warning label was estimated to avert 945,000 cases of T2D over 10 years (95% UI=442,000, 1,820,000) as compared to 480,000 (147,000, 1,140,000) cases averted under a text warning label. A $0.02/fluid ounce excise tax was estimated to avert 1,260,000 (646,000, 2,160,000) cases of T2D over 10 years. If repealed after 1 year, the policy would only avert 78,000 (0, 469,000) cases of T2D.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SSB policies may be an approach to meaningfully decrease the number of individuals with T2D. Policy design and sustainment drive the magnitude of effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108278"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146047172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cumulative disadvantage in education and progression of physical-mental-cognitive multimorbidity: evidence from two national cohorts. 教育的累积劣势和身体-心理-认知多病的进展:来自两个国家队列的证据。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108277
Junjie Cao, Shijun Yang, Chengchao Zhou

Introduction: Socioeconomic determinants such as education have been shown to be vital factors in multimorbidity progression among middle-aged and older adults. However, whether cumulative disadvantage in education is associated with multimorbidity progression remains unclear, particularly in cross-cultural contexts. This study aimed to investigate the progression of physical-mental-cognitive multimorbidity (PMC), and to evaluate how cumulative disadvantage in education influenced its progression among Chinese and English populations.

Methods: Data were extracted from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (2011-2020) and English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (2011-2019). Cumulative disadvantage in education was measured by classification of educational years among core family members (participants, their parents and spouse). Multimorbidity involved chronic conditions in physical-mental-cognitive domains, and its quantitative changes were identified through group-based trajectory modeling. Logistic regressions and competing risk models were used to examine associations of educational disadvantages and multimorbidity trajectories.

Results: A total of 13,278 participants aged ≥45 were included. Four multimorbidity trajectories were identified: steady, slow growth, medium growth, and fast growth. Most individuals had severe educational disadvantage (45.46%) and physical-mental multimorbidity pattern (23.26%). Educational disadvantage was significantly associated with faster multimorbidity trajectories (P <0.001) and higher risks of complex multimorbidity patterns, particularly PMC multimorbidity (P <0.001). Maternal education significantly influenced multimorbidity progressions in England (P <0.001), but not in China (P = 0.100).

Conclusions: It is important to monitor quantitative and pattern changes in multimorbidity among middle-aged and older adults holistically. Public health should prioritize individuals with educational disadvantages as well as their families to more effectively address multimorbidity management.

社会经济决定因素,如教育已被证明是中年和老年人多重疾病进展的重要因素。然而,教育方面的累积劣势是否与多病进展相关仍不清楚,特别是在跨文化背景下。本研究旨在探讨中英两国人群身体-心理-认知多病(PMC)的发展,并评估教育方面的累积劣势对其发展的影响。方法:数据提取自中国健康与退休纵向研究(2011-2020)和英国老龄化纵向研究(2011-2019)。通过核心家庭成员(参与者及其父母和配偶)的受教育年限分类来衡量教育方面的累积劣势。多病涉及身体-心理-认知领域的慢性疾病,并通过基于群体的轨迹模型确定其定量变化。Logistic回归和竞争风险模型被用来检验教育劣势和多病轨迹的关联。结果:共纳入13278名年龄≥45岁的受试者。确定了四种多发病轨迹:稳定、缓慢增长、中等增长和快速增长。大多数个体存在严重的教育劣势(45.46%)和身心多病模式(23.26%)。结论:全面监测中老年人多发病的数量和模式变化是很重要的。公共卫生应优先考虑有教育劣势的个人及其家庭,以更有效地解决多重疾病管理问题。
{"title":"Cumulative disadvantage in education and progression of physical-mental-cognitive multimorbidity: evidence from two national cohorts.","authors":"Junjie Cao, Shijun Yang, Chengchao Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108277","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108277","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Socioeconomic determinants such as education have been shown to be vital factors in multimorbidity progression among middle-aged and older adults. However, whether cumulative disadvantage in education is associated with multimorbidity progression remains unclear, particularly in cross-cultural contexts. This study aimed to investigate the progression of physical-mental-cognitive multimorbidity (PMC), and to evaluate how cumulative disadvantage in education influenced its progression among Chinese and English populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (2011-2020) and English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (2011-2019). Cumulative disadvantage in education was measured by classification of educational years among core family members (participants, their parents and spouse). Multimorbidity involved chronic conditions in physical-mental-cognitive domains, and its quantitative changes were identified through group-based trajectory modeling. Logistic regressions and competing risk models were used to examine associations of educational disadvantages and multimorbidity trajectories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13,278 participants aged ≥45 were included. Four multimorbidity trajectories were identified: steady, slow growth, medium growth, and fast growth. Most individuals had severe educational disadvantage (45.46%) and physical-mental multimorbidity pattern (23.26%). Educational disadvantage was significantly associated with faster multimorbidity trajectories (P <0.001) and higher risks of complex multimorbidity patterns, particularly PMC multimorbidity (P <0.001). Maternal education significantly influenced multimorbidity progressions in England (P <0.001), but not in China (P = 0.100).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is important to monitor quantitative and pattern changes in multimorbidity among middle-aged and older adults holistically. Public health should prioritize individuals with educational disadvantages as well as their families to more effectively address multimorbidity management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108277"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146042143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systematic Review of Non-Medical Costs of Firearm Injury. 枪支伤害非医疗费用的系统回顾。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108276
David W Hutton, Taylor W Lefler, Danwei Yang, Shiying Mai, Michael Holtz, Hanwen Zhang, Honey S Modi, William B Hillegass, Marc Zimmerman, Patrick M Carter

Introduction: To evaluate the impact of firearm injury prevention programs and policies, it is important to characterize firearm injury costs. A prior review evaluated medical-specific firearm injury costs, but non-medical societal costs have not been previously reviewed. This study explicitly reviews the non-medical costs of both fatal and nonfatal firearm injury.

Methods: A systematic review of studies conducted from 2000-2023 in English reporting non-medical costs of U.S. firearm injury in Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EconLit, JSTOR as well as grey literature. The methods, data quality, types of non-medical costs, and the relationship between non-medical and medical costs were extracted. Bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and synthesized based on the SWiM (Synthesis without meta-analysis) guidelines.

Results: Nineteen studies analyzing national, state, city, and individual costs were identified. Studies generally used modeling approaches (13 studies) to calculate costs, but four used a cohort approach and two used a willingness-to-pay approach. Studies evaluated wide ranges of costs: medical, productivity, intangible (quality-of-life), criminal justice, and other costs. In studies evaluating both medical and non-medical costs, non-medical costs were much higher, with criminal justice costs being 1.5 to 3.9 times larger, productivity costs being 14 to 25 times larger, and intangible costs being 29 to 175 times larger than medical costs.

Discussion: The literature on non-medical costs is relatively under-developed, leading to wide ranges in results. Studies consistently show non-medical costs are orders of magnitude larger than medical costs of firearm injury with total costs potentially in the millions of dollars per injury. More research on non-medical costs of firearm injury will help quantify and clarify the magnitude of these costs, as well as be used to understand the cost-savings of specific prevention policies or programs.

为了评估枪支伤害预防计划和政策的影响,表征枪支伤害成本是很重要的。先前的审查评估了医疗特定的火器伤害费用,但非医疗社会费用以前没有审查。本研究明确回顾了致死性和非致死性火器伤害的非医疗费用。方法:系统回顾2000-2023年在Embase、PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、EconLit、JSTOR以及灰色文献中进行的关于美国枪支伤害非医疗费用的英文报告研究。提取了方法、数据质量、非医疗费用类型以及非医疗费用与医疗费用之间的关系。偏倚采用改良的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估,并根据SWiM(综合无荟萃分析)指南进行综合。结果:19项研究分析了国家、州、城市和个人的成本。研究通常使用建模方法(13项研究)来计算成本,但有4项使用队列方法,2项使用支付意愿方法。研究评估了范围广泛的成本:医疗、生产力、无形(生活质量)、刑事司法和其他成本。在评估医疗和非医疗成本的研究中,非医疗成本要高得多,刑事司法成本是医疗成本的1.5至3.9倍,生产力成本是14至25倍,无形成本是医疗成本的29至175倍。讨论:关于非医疗费用的文献相对欠发达,导致结果差异较大。研究一致表明,非医疗成本比枪支伤害的医疗成本高出几个数量级,每次伤害的总成本可能达到数百万美元。更多关于枪支伤害的非医疗成本的研究将有助于量化和澄清这些成本的大小,以及用于了解特定预防政策或计划的成本节约。
{"title":"Systematic Review of Non-Medical Costs of Firearm Injury.","authors":"David W Hutton, Taylor W Lefler, Danwei Yang, Shiying Mai, Michael Holtz, Hanwen Zhang, Honey S Modi, William B Hillegass, Marc Zimmerman, Patrick M Carter","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108276","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate the impact of firearm injury prevention programs and policies, it is important to characterize firearm injury costs. A prior review evaluated medical-specific firearm injury costs, but non-medical societal costs have not been previously reviewed. This study explicitly reviews the non-medical costs of both fatal and nonfatal firearm injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of studies conducted from 2000-2023 in English reporting non-medical costs of U.S. firearm injury in Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EconLit, JSTOR as well as grey literature. The methods, data quality, types of non-medical costs, and the relationship between non-medical and medical costs were extracted. Bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and synthesized based on the SWiM (Synthesis without meta-analysis) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies analyzing national, state, city, and individual costs were identified. Studies generally used modeling approaches (13 studies) to calculate costs, but four used a cohort approach and two used a willingness-to-pay approach. Studies evaluated wide ranges of costs: medical, productivity, intangible (quality-of-life), criminal justice, and other costs. In studies evaluating both medical and non-medical costs, non-medical costs were much higher, with criminal justice costs being 1.5 to 3.9 times larger, productivity costs being 14 to 25 times larger, and intangible costs being 29 to 175 times larger than medical costs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The literature on non-medical costs is relatively under-developed, leading to wide ranges in results. Studies consistently show non-medical costs are orders of magnitude larger than medical costs of firearm injury with total costs potentially in the millions of dollars per injury. More research on non-medical costs of firearm injury will help quantify and clarify the magnitude of these costs, as well as be used to understand the cost-savings of specific prevention policies or programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108276"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146041667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
State and county trends in Florida's extreme risk protection order implementation: A descriptive policy analysis. 佛罗里达州极端风险保护令实施的州和县趋势:描述性政策分析。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108285
Julie A Ward, Grace E Bebarta, Elizabeth D Wagner, Cassandra K Crifasi, April M Zeoli

Introduction: Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) statutes allow temporary firearm removal and possession prohibition during periods of extreme risk of self- or other-directed harm. Prior research suggests most frequent use for White men, but population rates are underexamined. This study's objective was to describe county-specific frequency and rate of ERPO petitioning by respondent demographics across Florida's first 3.8 years of policy implementation.

Methods: ERPO petitions filed from 3/9/2018-12/31/2021 were obtained directly from court records or through public records requests from 65 of 67 Florida counties. Age, gender, and race or ethnicity of ERPO respondents were identified from petitions and aggregated by county-year. Petitioning rates per 100,000 resident-years were calculated and mapped to visualize incidence by county tertiles (no-/low-, moderate-, and high-use). Total petitioning incidence and incidence by respondent demographics were compared between tertiles and within tertiles over time.

Results: In total, 8,611 petitions were filed. ERPO petitioning generally increased over time, with greatest variability in moderate-use counties. Statewide, petitioning rates were higher for White residents than other race and ethnicity groups. Yet, in low-use counties, Black residents were subject to ERPOs at comparable rates to White residents, and in 2021, petitioning for Black residents was comparable or higher than for White residents in moderate- and high-use counties. Women, older adults, and residents of one-third of Florida's counties rarely received ERPOs.

Conclusions: Despite overall increased use, the relative rareness per capita and unevenness of ERPO petitioning statewide implies disparate policy implementation experiences among residents, potentially complicating attainment of intended policy effects.

简介:极端风险保护令(ERPO)法规允许在自我或他人直接伤害的极端风险期间临时移除枪支和禁止持有枪支。先前的研究表明,白人男性使用频率最高,但人口比例尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是描述在佛罗里达州政策实施的前3.8年,根据受访者人口统计数据,特定县的ERPO请愿频率和比率。方法:从2018年3月9日至2021年12月31日提交的ERPO请愿书直接从佛罗里达州67个县中的65个县的法院记录或公共记录请求中获得。受访者的年龄、性别、种族或民族从请愿书中确定,并按县年度汇总。计算每10万居民年的上访率并绘制地图,以显示按县类型(无/低、中等和高使用)的发病率。随着时间的推移,总上访发生率和被调查者人口统计数据的发生率在五分位数之间和五分位数内进行了比较。结果:共收到8611份申请。ERPO申请通常随着时间的推移而增加,在中等利用县变化最大。在全州范围内,白人居民的请愿率高于其他种族和族裔群体。然而,在低使用率县,黑人居民的ERPOs率与白人居民相当,并且在2021年,在中等和高使用率县,黑人居民的请愿率与白人居民相当或更高。佛罗里达州三分之一的县的妇女、老年人和居民很少接受ERPOs。结论:尽管总体上增加了使用,但在全州范围内,ERPO请愿的人均相对稀缺性和不均匀性意味着居民的政策实施经验不同,这可能会使预期政策效果的实现复杂化。
{"title":"State and county trends in Florida's extreme risk protection order implementation: A descriptive policy analysis.","authors":"Julie A Ward, Grace E Bebarta, Elizabeth D Wagner, Cassandra K Crifasi, April M Zeoli","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108285","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108285","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) statutes allow temporary firearm removal and possession prohibition during periods of extreme risk of self- or other-directed harm. Prior research suggests most frequent use for White men, but population rates are underexamined. This study's objective was to describe county-specific frequency and rate of ERPO petitioning by respondent demographics across Florida's first 3.8 years of policy implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ERPO petitions filed from 3/9/2018-12/31/2021 were obtained directly from court records or through public records requests from 65 of 67 Florida counties. Age, gender, and race or ethnicity of ERPO respondents were identified from petitions and aggregated by county-year. Petitioning rates per 100,000 resident-years were calculated and mapped to visualize incidence by county tertiles (no-/low-, moderate-, and high-use). Total petitioning incidence and incidence by respondent demographics were compared between tertiles and within tertiles over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 8,611 petitions were filed. ERPO petitioning generally increased over time, with greatest variability in moderate-use counties. Statewide, petitioning rates were higher for White residents than other race and ethnicity groups. Yet, in low-use counties, Black residents were subject to ERPOs at comparable rates to White residents, and in 2021, petitioning for Black residents was comparable or higher than for White residents in moderate- and high-use counties. Women, older adults, and residents of one-third of Florida's counties rarely received ERPOs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite overall increased use, the relative rareness per capita and unevenness of ERPO petitioning statewide implies disparate policy implementation experiences among residents, potentially complicating attainment of intended policy effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108285"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146042096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes in Cigarette Availability and Sales Associated with California's Statewide Flavored Tobacco Sales Restriction: A Synthetic Control Analysis. 卷烟的可得性和销售变化与加州全州风味烟草销售限制有关:一项综合控制分析。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108286
Morgan A Whitney, Doris G Gammon, James Nonnemaker, Lisa Henriksen, Elizabeth Andersen-Rodgers, Rafael Colonna, Todd Rogers

Introduction: California enacted a statewide restriction on flavored tobacco product sales on December 21, 2022. Policy efforts to eliminate flavored tobacco products from retail environments are designed to restrict consumer access, with the goal of reducing initiation and experimentation, and supporting cessation.

Methods: This study used NielsenIQ retail scanner data to study cigarette pack sales and availability (i.e., the weekly number of universal product codes (UPCs) with positive sales), pre-intervention (1/1/2021 to 12/17/2022) to post-intervention (12/18/2022 to 12/30/2023) overall and by flavor category: tobacco/unflavored, menthol, and "nonmenthol" labeled. A control method was employed to create a synthetic California, based on pre-intervention-period data, to compare to California, post-intervention.

Results: From pre- to post-intervention, average weekly availability of menthol cigarettes decreased 44% in California, with ∼175 products still available in December 2023; sales decreased by 90%. "Non-menthol" labeled cigarette availability increased 194% and sales increased 708%. Total cigarette availability in California decreased, but total sales were unchanged. Changes in California were distinct from synthetic California.

Conclusions: California's statewide flavored tobacco sales restriction was effective at reducing the availability and sale of menthol cigarettes despite the increase in availability and sales of "non-menthol" labeled cigarettes. Total cigarette sales remain unchanged in the oneyear post-intervention due to the increase in sales of "non-menthol" labeled cigarettes.

导言:加州于2022年12月21日在全州范围内实施了调味烟草产品销售限制。从零售环境中消除加味烟草制品的政策努力旨在限制消费者获取,目的是减少初次接触和试验,并支持戒烟。方法:本研究使用NielsenIQ零售扫描仪数据研究卷烟包装销售和可用性(即每周销售的通用产品代码(upc)的数量),干预前(2021年1月1日至2022年12月17日)至干预后(2022年12月18日至2023年12月30日)的整体和风味类别:烟草/无香料,薄荷醇和“非薄荷醇”标签。采用对照方法,根据干预前的数据创建一个合成的加州,与干预后的加州进行比较。结果:从干预前到干预后,加州薄荷香烟的平均每周供应量下降了44%,到2023年12月仍有175种产品可用;销售额下降了90%。贴有“非薄荷醇”标签的香烟供应量增加了194%,销量增加了708%。加州的香烟总供应量下降了,但总销售额没有变化。加州的变化不同于人工合成的加州。结论:尽管“非薄荷醇”标签香烟的可得性和销量有所增加,但加州全州范围内的调味烟草销售限制在减少薄荷醇香烟的可得性和销量方面是有效的。由于“非薄荷醇”标签香烟的销量增加,在干预后的一年内,香烟总销量保持不变。
{"title":"Changes in Cigarette Availability and Sales Associated with California's Statewide Flavored Tobacco Sales Restriction: A Synthetic Control Analysis.","authors":"Morgan A Whitney, Doris G Gammon, James Nonnemaker, Lisa Henriksen, Elizabeth Andersen-Rodgers, Rafael Colonna, Todd Rogers","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108286","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108286","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>California enacted a statewide restriction on flavored tobacco product sales on December 21, 2022. Policy efforts to eliminate flavored tobacco products from retail environments are designed to restrict consumer access, with the goal of reducing initiation and experimentation, and supporting cessation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used NielsenIQ retail scanner data to study cigarette pack sales and availability (i.e., the weekly number of universal product codes (UPCs) with positive sales), pre-intervention (1/1/2021 to 12/17/2022) to post-intervention (12/18/2022 to 12/30/2023) overall and by flavor category: tobacco/unflavored, menthol, and \"nonmenthol\" labeled. A control method was employed to create a synthetic California, based on pre-intervention-period data, to compare to California, post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From pre- to post-intervention, average weekly availability of menthol cigarettes decreased 44% in California, with ∼175 products still available in December 2023; sales decreased by 90%. \"Non-menthol\" labeled cigarette availability increased 194% and sales increased 708%. Total cigarette availability in California decreased, but total sales were unchanged. Changes in California were distinct from synthetic California.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>California's statewide flavored tobacco sales restriction was effective at reducing the availability and sale of menthol cigarettes despite the increase in availability and sales of \"non-menthol\" labeled cigarettes. Total cigarette sales remain unchanged in the oneyear post-intervention due to the increase in sales of \"non-menthol\" labeled cigarettes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108286"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146042134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Promoting Preventive Medicine: Increasing Specialty Awareness, Knowledge and Interest through Peer-to-Peer Education and Engagement. 促进预防医学:通过点对点教育和参与提高专业意识、知识和兴趣。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108287
Marissa Khajavi, Minahil Cheema, Jennifer Paul-Quinn

Medical students often lack sufficient awareness and understanding of preventive medicine. Students acknowledge the importance of training in prevention and public health, but there is low awareness of the specialty, with few medical students considering it as a career path. This study aimed to assess the lack of awareness and understanding of the specialty of Public Health and General PH/GPM (PH/GPM) among medical students as well as increase the number of students considering a career in the specialty. Participants completed a pre-survey that assessed their current awareness, knowledge, and interest of the PH/GPM specialty. The intervention consisted of distributing the American College Prevention Medicine (ACPM) toolkit, video, and flyers, and a Q&A. A post-survey assessed changes and elicited the most appealing learning method. The study population included all medical students at the University of Maryland. The data was collected and analyzed in 2024. Pre- and post-survey responses were compared using chi-square tests. All three outcomes (awareness, knowledge, and interest) improved significantly from pre (n=430) to post-survey (n=390). Awareness increased from 48% to 100% (p<0.0001), knowledge increased from 18% to 96% (p<0.0001) and interest increased from 10% to 67% (p<0.0001). Flyers were identified as the most appealing method (see Figure 1.) of information delivery (71% of respondents), followed by the ACPM toolkit (25%), and ACPM video (4%). There is an opportunity in medical schools to provide targeted education to increase medical students' awareness, understanding, and interest in the specialty. PH/GPM remains under-recognized and under-promoted in medical schools. Educational outreach in medical schools may increase the number of future doctors pursuing careers in PH/GPM.

医学生对预防医学的认识和理解往往不足。学生们承认预防和公共卫生培训的重要性,但对该专业的认识很低,很少有医科学生将其作为职业道路。本研究旨在评估医学生对公共卫生和一般PH/GPM (PH/GPM)专业缺乏认识和理解的情况,并增加考虑在该专业工作的学生人数。参与者完成了一项预调查,评估了他们目前对PH/GPM专业的认识、知识和兴趣。干预包括分发美国大学预防医学(ACPM)工具包、视频、传单和问答。一项事后调查评估了变化,并得出了最吸引人的学习方法。研究对象包括马里兰大学的所有医学院学生。数据是在2024年收集和分析的。使用卡方检验比较调查前后的反应。从调查前(n=430)到调查后(n=390),所有三个结果(意识、知识和兴趣)都有显著改善。意识从48%增加到100% (p
{"title":"Promoting Preventive Medicine: Increasing Specialty Awareness, Knowledge and Interest through Peer-to-Peer Education and Engagement.","authors":"Marissa Khajavi, Minahil Cheema, Jennifer Paul-Quinn","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108287","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108287","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical students often lack sufficient awareness and understanding of preventive medicine. Students acknowledge the importance of training in prevention and public health, but there is low awareness of the specialty, with few medical students considering it as a career path. This study aimed to assess the lack of awareness and understanding of the specialty of Public Health and General PH/GPM (PH/GPM) among medical students as well as increase the number of students considering a career in the specialty. Participants completed a pre-survey that assessed their current awareness, knowledge, and interest of the PH/GPM specialty. The intervention consisted of distributing the American College Prevention Medicine (ACPM) toolkit, video, and flyers, and a Q&A. A post-survey assessed changes and elicited the most appealing learning method. The study population included all medical students at the University of Maryland. The data was collected and analyzed in 2024. Pre- and post-survey responses were compared using chi-square tests. All three outcomes (awareness, knowledge, and interest) improved significantly from pre (n=430) to post-survey (n=390). Awareness increased from 48% to 100% (p<0.0001), knowledge increased from 18% to 96% (p<0.0001) and interest increased from 10% to 67% (p<0.0001). Flyers were identified as the most appealing method (see Figure 1.) of information delivery (71% of respondents), followed by the ACPM toolkit (25%), and ACPM video (4%). There is an opportunity in medical schools to provide targeted education to increase medical students' awareness, understanding, and interest in the specialty. PH/GPM remains under-recognized and under-promoted in medical schools. Educational outreach in medical schools may increase the number of future doctors pursuing careers in PH/GPM.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108287"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146042146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1