Nasal turbinals are key osseous structures for air conditioning and olfaction in mammals, with their morphology reflecting both ecological adaptations and evolutionary history. This study evaluates how climatic gradients and locomotor strategy (subterranean or surface dwelling species) influence turbinal complexity in caviomorph rodents. Using microCT imaging, we quantified respiratory (RZ) and olfactory (OZ) turbinal morphology across eight caviomorph rodents and two outgroups from xeric, mesic, and generalist habitats, including subterranean and surface-dwelling species. Our results revealed that xeric-adapted subterranean species exhibited significantly expanded RZ surface areas and greater structural complexity, consistent with enhanced water retention demands in arid environments. While surface-dwelling species showed larger absolute OZ areas compared to subterranean taxa, this difference became non-significant after accounting for body size, suggesting olfactory structures are less influenced by locomotor strategy than by allometric or phylogenetic factors. Respiratory turbinals appeared more variable across habitats, whereas olfactory turbinals showed comparatively conserved morphology among ecological groups. This pattern could reflect differing evolutionary pressures acting on thermoregulatory versus sensory systems in rodents. The observed trade-off between respiratory efficiency and olfactory capacity suggests how multiple selective forces may shape anatomical specialization in response to environmental challenges. These findings provide new insights into functional constraints governing nasal evolution, proposing a framework for interpreting ecological adaptations in caviomorphs. Our study illustrates how integrating quantitative morphometrics with ecological data can elucidate complex structure–function relationships in mammalian anatomy.
{"title":"Predicting hydric and thermic balance in caviomorph rodents through nasal turbinals morphometry: Impact of life habits","authors":"María Belén Baldo, Guido Buezas, Daniel Antenucci","doi":"10.1002/ar.25688","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.25688","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nasal turbinals are key osseous structures for air conditioning and olfaction in mammals, with their morphology reflecting both ecological adaptations and evolutionary history. This study evaluates how climatic gradients and locomotor strategy (subterranean or surface dwelling species) influence turbinal complexity in caviomorph rodents. Using microCT imaging, we quantified respiratory (RZ) and olfactory (OZ) turbinal morphology across eight caviomorph rodents and two outgroups from xeric, mesic, and generalist habitats, including subterranean and surface-dwelling species. Our results revealed that xeric-adapted subterranean species exhibited significantly expanded RZ surface areas and greater structural complexity, consistent with enhanced water retention demands in arid environments. While surface-dwelling species showed larger absolute OZ areas compared to subterranean taxa, this difference became non-significant after accounting for body size, suggesting olfactory structures are less influenced by locomotor strategy than by allometric or phylogenetic factors. Respiratory turbinals appeared more variable across habitats, whereas olfactory turbinals showed comparatively conserved morphology among ecological groups. This pattern could reflect differing evolutionary pressures acting on thermoregulatory versus sensory systems in rodents. The observed trade-off between respiratory efficiency and olfactory capacity suggests how multiple selective forces may shape anatomical specialization in response to environmental challenges. These findings provide new insights into functional constraints governing nasal evolution, proposing a framework for interpreting ecological adaptations in caviomorphs. Our study illustrates how integrating quantitative morphometrics with ecological data can elucidate complex structure–function relationships in mammalian anatomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"309 2","pages":"379-396"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144295584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Adam Hartstone-Rose, Tahlia I. Pollock, Lars Werdelin
Sabertooth creatures are fascinating to the public and to scientists. This Special Issue on The Anatomy of Sabertooths starts with a discussion of what exactly a sabertooth is, continues with a couple of papers about other animals with extraordinarily long teeth, and then delves into analyses of fossil sabertoothed taxa—some of which are not traditionally thought of as sabertooths and some of which are, but may not fit into the functional paradigm that we most associate with the sabertooth suite of morphology. The issue concludes with several studies that closely examine the function of the sabers themselves and then a final paper on one of the enduring mysteries about sabertooth anatomy that has nothing to do with their teeth at all. We proudly present this issue that has been years in the making and represents the work of scholars from around the world, all career stages, and experts in methodologies from traditional to cutting-edge, unified in our desire to bring you new and interesting insights into these taxa that continue to spark the imagination of budding future paleontologists and emeritus colleagues alike.
{"title":"Commentary: What's so interesting about sabertooths?","authors":"Adam Hartstone-Rose, Tahlia I. Pollock, Lars Werdelin","doi":"10.1002/ar.70007","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.70007","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sabertooth creatures are fascinating to the public and to scientists. This Special Issue on The Anatomy of Sabertooths starts with a discussion of what exactly a sabertooth is, continues with a couple of papers about other animals with extraordinarily long teeth, and then delves into analyses of fossil sabertoothed taxa—some of which are not traditionally thought of as sabertooths and some of which are, but may not fit into the functional paradigm that we most associate with the sabertooth suite of morphology. The issue concludes with several studies that closely examine the function of the sabers themselves and then a final paper on one of the enduring mysteries about sabertooth anatomy that has nothing to do with their teeth at all. We proudly present this issue that has been years in the making and represents the work of scholars from around the world, all career stages, and experts in methodologies from traditional to cutting-edge, unified in our desire to bring you new and interesting insights into these taxa that continue to spark the imagination of budding future paleontologists and emeritus colleagues alike.</p>","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"308 11","pages":"2825-2830"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ar.70007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144277965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rodolfo Otávio Santos, Mark Wilkinson, Hussam Zaher
Caecilians comprise a relatively small (~220 species) group (Gymnophiona) of snake-like or worm-like, mostly tropical amphibians. Most adult caecilians are fossorial, although some species may live in aquatic or semi-aquatic environments, either as larvae or adults. Caecilians exhibit numerous morphological features traditionally interpreted as adaptations to their specialized ecologies, such as a compact and well-ossified skull and an elongated body lacking both girdles and limbs. Caecilian vertebrae differ substantially from those of other amphibians in having amphicoelous centra, well-developed basapophyseal processes, pronounced posterosagittal processes and hypapophyseal keels, and low and flat neural arches. However, caecilian postcranial osteology has received little attention, and the vast majority of the species remain unstudied. Consequently, the variation in the vertebral morphology among caecilians is still unknown or poorly documented. Inconsistencies in the anatomical terminology used by different authors are potentially confusing and may hamper understanding of homologies. Here we present an overview of caecilian postcranial osteology, define the main structural features, including many not previously described, and propose a standardized nomenclature.
{"title":"An overview of the postcranial osteology of caecilians (Gymnophiona, Lissamphibia)","authors":"Rodolfo Otávio Santos, Mark Wilkinson, Hussam Zaher","doi":"10.1002/ar.70000","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.70000","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Caecilians comprise a relatively small (~220 species) group (Gymnophiona) of snake-like or worm-like, mostly tropical amphibians. Most adult caecilians are fossorial, although some species may live in aquatic or semi-aquatic environments, either as larvae or adults. Caecilians exhibit numerous morphological features traditionally interpreted as adaptations to their specialized ecologies, such as a compact and well-ossified skull and an elongated body lacking both girdles and limbs. Caecilian vertebrae differ substantially from those of other amphibians in having amphicoelous centra, well-developed basapophyseal processes, pronounced posterosagittal processes and hypapophyseal keels, and low and flat neural arches. However, caecilian postcranial osteology has received little attention, and the vast majority of the species remain unstudied. Consequently, the variation in the vertebral morphology among caecilians is still unknown or poorly documented. Inconsistencies in the anatomical terminology used by different authors are potentially confusing and may hamper understanding of homologies. Here we present an overview of caecilian postcranial osteology, define the main structural features, including many not previously described, and propose a standardized nomenclature.</p>","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"309 3","pages":"674-699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ar.70000","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144251780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J. M. López-Rey, D. M. Doe, O. Cambra-Moo, A. González Martín, D. García-Martínez
Ribs undergo numerous changes during growth and development. Although they occur both externally and internally, the latter are not as extensively documented during the transition from puberty to adulthood. Therefore, it is unknown how rib cross-sectional mineralized area changes during this period. To shed light on this issue, we micro-CT scanned ribs from each costal level belonging to 21 individuals equally distributed into three developmental groups: pre-pubescents, post-pubescents, and adults. Then we selected the cross section at the midshaft of each rib and measured its percentage of mineralized area. Our results show that adults have lower mineralized area in their rib cross sections than both pre- and post-pubescents, which is consistent with previous research. Between pre- and post-pubescents, mineralized area is greater in the latter from costal levels 1–8. We propose that this might respond to a peak of mineralized area happening during late puberty. Regarding the tendency of the data, the three groups show a U-shaped trend with two maximum values at costal levels 1 and 12 and a minimum value at levels 4–5. We suggest that greater values are located at the beginning and the end of the costal series due to the mechanical stress produced in these areas by the scalene muscles (ribs 1–2) and diaphragm (ribs 7–12) during breathing. Interestingly, the U-shaped trend is less pronounced in pubescents, whose central costal levels have relatively more mineralized area than that of adults due to ongoing maturation from the external to central costal levels.
{"title":"Mineralized area of the human rib cross-sections from early puberty until adulthood","authors":"J. M. López-Rey, D. M. Doe, O. Cambra-Moo, A. González Martín, D. García-Martínez","doi":"10.1002/ar.70001","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.70001","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ribs undergo numerous changes during growth and development. Although they occur both externally and internally, the latter are not as extensively documented during the transition from puberty to adulthood. Therefore, it is unknown how rib cross-sectional mineralized area changes during this period. To shed light on this issue, we micro-CT scanned ribs from each costal level belonging to 21 individuals equally distributed into three developmental groups: pre-pubescents, post-pubescents, and adults. Then we selected the cross section at the midshaft of each rib and measured its percentage of mineralized area. Our results show that adults have lower mineralized area in their rib cross sections than both pre- and post-pubescents, which is consistent with previous research. Between pre- and post-pubescents, mineralized area is greater in the latter from costal levels 1–8. We propose that this might respond to a peak of mineralized area happening during late puberty. Regarding the tendency of the data, the three groups show a U-shaped trend with two maximum values at costal levels 1 and 12 and a minimum value at levels 4–5. We suggest that greater values are located at the beginning and the end of the costal series due to the mechanical stress produced in these areas by the scalene muscles (ribs 1–2) and diaphragm (ribs 7–12) during breathing. Interestingly, the U-shaped trend is less pronounced in pubescents, whose central costal levels have relatively more mineralized area than that of adults due to ongoing maturation from the external to central costal levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"309 3","pages":"649-656"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ar.70001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144188757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tito Aureliano, Waltécio Almeida, Marcelo A. Fernandes, Aline Marcele Ghilardi
This study investigates the occurrence of osteomyelitis in non-avian dinosaurs, focusing on the Ibirá locality, a site with a high incidence of this pathological condition. We analyzed six new osteopathic sauropod specimens from the Upper Cretaceous of Brazil. The results revealed a relationship between infection and bone remodeling, denoted by various manifestations of reactive bone neoformation, including periosteal reaction. Healing tissues were not identified, which implies that the individuals died when the infection was still active. We described distinct manifestations of osteomyelitis with periosteal bone neoformation: (1) periosteal reaction within small circular protrusions; (2) ellipsoid protrusions in a fingerprint pattern; (3) enlarged protrusions both in height and area. This study underscores the importance of examining pathological conditions in extinct species to enhance our understanding of their physiology and interactions with their ancient environments.
{"title":"Several occurrences of osteomyelitis in dinosaurs from a site in the Bauru Group, Cretaceous of Southeast Brazil","authors":"Tito Aureliano, Waltécio Almeida, Marcelo A. Fernandes, Aline Marcele Ghilardi","doi":"10.1002/ar.70003","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.70003","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the occurrence of osteomyelitis in non-avian dinosaurs, focusing on the Ibirá locality, a site with a high incidence of this pathological condition. We analyzed six new osteopathic sauropod specimens from the Upper Cretaceous of Brazil. The results revealed a relationship between infection and bone remodeling, denoted by various manifestations of reactive bone neoformation, including periosteal reaction. Healing tissues were not identified, which implies that the individuals died when the infection was still active. We described distinct manifestations of osteomyelitis with periosteal bone neoformation: (1) periosteal reaction within small circular protrusions; (2) ellipsoid protrusions in a fingerprint pattern; (3) enlarged protrusions both in height and area. This study underscores the importance of examining pathological conditions in extinct species to enhance our understanding of their physiology and interactions with their ancient environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"309 3","pages":"642-648"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ar.70003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144192654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Igor V. Doronin, Marina A. Doronina, Yulia I. Tsuryumova
Limb abnormalities are one of the most common deformities of vertebrates. They can be caused by both external and internal reasons. Limb abnormalities of amniotes are a fairly rare phenomenon, and mass limb abnormalities have not been found in amniote populations. Isolated cases of skeletal abnormalities are described mainly externally, without detailing the structure of the skeleton. This article presents descriptions of three abnormal specimens of hybrids of subspecies of Lacerta agilis (L. a. boemica × L. a. exigua). Two of them have oligodactyly of the right fore-limb. The third specimen demonstrates a unique combination of oligodactyly of the right and polydactyly of the left forelimbs.
{"title":"A unique case of limb abnormalities of a lizard (Reptilia, Lacertidae): Growth and development","authors":"Igor V. Doronin, Marina A. Doronina, Yulia I. Tsuryumova","doi":"10.1002/ar.70004","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.70004","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Limb abnormalities are one of the most common deformities of vertebrates. They can be caused by both external and internal reasons. Limb abnormalities of amniotes are a fairly rare phenomenon, and mass limb abnormalities have not been found in amniote populations. Isolated cases of skeletal abnormalities are described mainly externally, without detailing the structure of the skeleton. This article presents descriptions of three abnormal specimens of hybrids of subspecies of <i>Lacerta agilis</i> (<i>L. a. boemica</i> × <i>L. a. exigua</i>). Two of them have oligodactyly of the right fore-limb. The third specimen demonstrates a unique combination of oligodactyly of the right and polydactyly of the left forelimbs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"309 3","pages":"657-662"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144183234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
China has been a rich source of fossils for nearly a century, beginning with the discovery of so-called Peking man (Sinanthropus pekinensis), known today as Homo erectus pekinensis in the mid 1920s. The first Chinese dinosaurs were described in 1929, the sauropod Helopus (now Euhelopus) and the ornithopod Tanius, described by the Swedish paleontologist Carl Wiman. Over the next six decades, further dinosaurs were described by Yang Zhongjian (C.C. Young) and his students Dong Zhi-Ming and Zhao Xijin, but remained poorly known in the West. A golden age of Chinese paleontology began as spectacular feathered dinosaurs were described from Lagerstätten in northeastern China beginning in 1996. Today, China has more genera of dinosaurs than any country on earth. In addition to dinosaurs and birds, China has among the oldest fossil vertebrates on earth with Cambrian fish such as Haikouella and Myllokunmingia, one of the first fossil flowers with Early Cretaceous Archaefructus, and a rich fauna of mammals, including Early Eocene Archicebus, one of the earliest known fossil primates. Fossil mammals range from a Jurassic beaver-tailed aquatic docodont, Castorocauda, to a Cretaceous gobiconodontid, Repenomamus, which had the nerve to munch on a baby dinosaur, to Ice Age elephants, woolly rhinoceros, horses, and saber-toothed cats. Surprising new fossils of all kinds will continue to be discovered in China for decades to come.
{"title":"China shares fossil treasures with the world","authors":"Peter Dodson","doi":"10.1002/ar.25696","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.25696","url":null,"abstract":"<p>China has been a rich source of fossils for nearly a century, beginning with the discovery of so-called Peking man (<i>Sinanthropus pekinensis</i>), known today as <i>Homo erectus pekinensis</i> in the mid 1920s. The first Chinese dinosaurs were described in 1929, the sauropod <i>Helopus</i> (now <i>Euhelopus</i>) and the ornithopod <i>Tanius,</i> described by the Swedish paleontologist Carl Wiman. Over the next six decades, further dinosaurs were described by Yang Zhongjian (C.C. Young) and his students Dong Zhi-Ming and Zhao Xijin, but remained poorly known in the West. A golden age of Chinese paleontology began as spectacular feathered dinosaurs were described from Lagerstätten in northeastern China beginning in 1996. Today, China has more genera of dinosaurs than any country on earth. In addition to dinosaurs and birds, China has among the oldest fossil vertebrates on earth with Cambrian fish such as <i>Haikouella</i> and <i>Myllokunmingia,</i> one of the first fossil flowers with Early Cretaceous <i>Archaefructus,</i> and a rich fauna of mammals, including Early Eocene <i>Archicebus,</i> one of the earliest known fossil primates. Fossil mammals range from a Jurassic beaver-tailed aquatic docodont, <i>Castorocauda,</i> to a Cretaceous gobiconodontid, <i>Repenomamus,</i> which had the nerve to munch on a baby dinosaur, to Ice Age elephants, woolly rhinoceros, horses, and saber-toothed cats. Surprising new fossils of all kinds will continue to be discovered in China for decades to come.</p>","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"308 10","pages":"2806-2812"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ar.25696","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144153224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dean Falk, Christoph P. E. Zollikofer, Marcia S. Ponce de León
Since Raymond Dart's first attempt to identify the lunate sulcus (“Affenspalte,” simian sulcus) in a fossil hominin endocast—that of the Taung child (Australopithecus africanus)—paleoneurologists have debated this structure, which in the brains of monkeys and apes roughly coincides with the rostral boundary of the primary visual cortex. The classic view has been that the evolutionary expansion of the parietooccipital cortex “pushed” the lunate sulcus toward the back of the brain. However, there has been little consensus about how and when this might have happened during hominin evolution, as it has proven difficult to establish phylogenetic homology of potential lunate sulci in living humans with the lunate sulcus of great apes. Here we review the comparative neuroanatomical evidence and propose the hypothesis that the lunate sulcus underwent de-opercularization, that is, the structures buried within the sulcus expanded and became part of the external cortical surface. During this process, the lunate sulcus became shallow, fragmented, and eventually obliterated. Specifically, rather than migrating toward the occipital pole during brain evolution, the lunate sulcus was a hotspot for the evolutionary expansion of annectant gyri and their eventual emergence on the parietooccipital cortical surface. We test the de-opercularization hypothesis with an analysis of the parietooccipital endocranial region of early Homo from Dmanisi, Georgia, and conclude that in these fossils the lunate sulcus may have been in the evolutionary process of fragmentation as their brains became larger and their occipital lobes more caudally projected compared to earlier hominins.
{"title":"De-opercularization of the lunate sulcus in early Homo","authors":"Dean Falk, Christoph P. E. Zollikofer, Marcia S. Ponce de León","doi":"10.1002/ar.25694","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.25694","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since Raymond Dart's first attempt to identify the lunate sulcus (“Affenspalte,” simian sulcus) in a fossil hominin endocast—that of the Taung child (<i>Australopithecus africanus</i>)—paleoneurologists have debated this structure, which in the brains of monkeys and apes roughly coincides with the rostral boundary of the primary visual cortex. The classic view has been that the evolutionary expansion of the parietooccipital cortex “pushed” the lunate sulcus toward the back of the brain. However, there has been little consensus about how and when this might have happened during hominin evolution, as it has proven difficult to establish phylogenetic homology of potential lunate sulci in living humans with the lunate sulcus of great apes. Here we review the comparative neuroanatomical evidence and propose the hypothesis that the lunate sulcus underwent de-opercularization, that is, the structures buried within the sulcus expanded and became part of the external cortical surface. During this process, the lunate sulcus became shallow, fragmented, and eventually obliterated. Specifically, rather than migrating toward the occipital pole during brain evolution, the lunate sulcus was a hotspot for the evolutionary expansion of annectant gyri and their eventual emergence on the parietooccipital cortical surface. We test the de-opercularization hypothesis with an analysis of the parietooccipital endocranial region of early <i>Homo</i> from Dmanisi, Georgia, and conclude that in these fossils the lunate sulcus may have been in the evolutionary process of fragmentation as their brains became larger and their occipital lobes more caudally projected compared to earlier hominins.</p>","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"309 2","pages":"314-332"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144145301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Unlike people, not all body parts are equally important. We need our spleens, but can largely do without them. Portions of our intestines can be lost; parts of our liver, pancreas, thyroid, and lobes of our lungs are all needed, of course, but we can, more or less, survive while missing them. And while we have spares, an eye, ear, kidney, limb, tooth, or gonad (ouch!) can go. Even large parts of our heart can be grudgingly removed. But of all body parts, the one we can't be without, the pinnacle of all, is, well, our head! Data has shown that, for most humans, loss of the head significantly decreases the quality of life. Just ask (via a seance) Marie-Antoinette or some of Henry VIII's wives!</p><p>The scaffold for that remarkable and obviously essential region is the skull. Indeed, how this complex framework came to be evolutionarily and developmentally, and the meanderings that occur in disease and pathology, remain a topic of intense study. Many secrets to seminal patterns of animal form and function reside within the nooks and crannies that lie within. Indeed, few areas of human, comparative, evolutionary, and more recently, developmental, anatomy sensu lato, attract as much investigation as those exploring the skull.</p><p>Fascination with the skull probably first occurred when some Pliocene hominid ancestor hit some neighbor atop their head with a rock, heard a cracking sound, and stood fascinated by both the sound and oozing after-effects. In more recent, historical times, systematic exploration of the skull likely appeared with the Egyptians in preparation for mummification processes (see Elhadi et al., <span>2012</span>; Laitman, <span>2015</span>; Laitman & Albertine, <span>2015</span>; Lindsay et al., <span>2015</span>; Marquez et al., <span>2015</span>). Various anatomical explorers visited the skull in the ensuing centuries, each looking at differing aspects of the extraordinary container. Vesalius himself noted observations in cranial variation in his short chapter in the <i>Fabrica</i> itself (Vesalius, <span>1543</span>; see Hast & Garrison, <span>2000</span> for discussion) yet commented relatively little on internal structures and, interestingly, never portrayed structures such as the sinuses. Arguably, among the most intriguing of cranial “anatomists” was Leonardo da Vinci. Leonardo had an unrelenting fascination with the skull, particularly the skull base, the cornerstone of this special issue (vide infra). Leonardo's fascination derived, interestingly, not from his desire to uncover the basic anatomy and structure of the cranial base, but to identify the <i>senso comune</i>, “the seat of the soul,” which was a hot topic in his time and argued to reside somewhere within the cranial domain. Leonardo, never a modest soul, believed he indeed found its location, identifying it to be by the anterior part of what we now call the hypophyseal fossa (we hope you gain new reverence for this structure!) Interestingly, once he “
与人不同,不是所有的身体部位都同样重要。我们需要脾脏,但基本上没有它们也可以。我们的部分肠道可能会丢失;当然,我们的肝脏、胰腺、甲状腺和肺叶都是必需的,但我们或多或少可以在缺少它们的情况下生存下去。当我们有备用的时候,眼睛、耳朵、肾脏、四肢、牙齿或性腺(哎呦!)都可能会消失。甚至我们心脏的很大一部分也会被不情愿地切除。但在所有身体部位中,我们不能没有的,最重要的是,我们的头!数据显示,对大多数人来说,失去头部会显著降低生活质量。只要问问(通过降神)玛丽-安托瓦内特或亨利八世的一些妻子就知道了!这个显著而又明显必不可少的部位的支架就是头骨。事实上,这个复杂的框架是如何进化和发展的,以及在疾病和病理中发生的曲折,仍然是一个深入研究的话题。动物形态和功能的种子模式的许多秘密都存在于其中的角落和缝隙中。事实上,很少有人类的比较、进化和最近的发育解剖学领域能像对头骨的研究那样吸引如此多的研究。对头骨的迷恋可能始于某个上新世的原始人祖先用一块石头砸向某个邻居的头顶,听到一声裂开的声音,站在那里被声音和渗出的后遗症迷住了。在更近的历史时期,对头骨的系统探索可能出现在埃及人准备制作木乃伊的过程中(见Elhadi et al., 2012;Laitman, 2015;Laitman,艾伯丁,2015;Lindsay et al., 2015;Marquez et al., 2015)。在接下来的几个世纪里,不同的解剖学探险家参观了这个头骨,每个人都从不同的角度研究了这个非凡的容器。维萨里在他的简短章节中也提到了对颅骨变异的观察(维萨里,1543;参见Hast &;Garrison(2000年讨论),但对内部结构的评论相对较少,有趣的是,从未描绘过鼻窦等结构。可以说,最有趣的颅骨“解剖学家”之一是列奥纳多·达·芬奇。列奥纳多对头骨有着不可阻挡的迷恋,尤其是头骨底部,这是本期特刊的基石(见下文)。有趣的是,列奥纳多的迷恋并非源于他想要揭示颅底的基本解剖和结构,而是为了确定“灵魂之座”(senso comune),这在他的时代是一个热门话题,并被认为属于颅底领域。李奥纳多从来都不是一个谦虚的人,他相信他确实找到了它的位置,并通过我们现在所说的垂体窝的前部确定了它(我们希望你对这个结构获得新的敬畏!)有趣的是,一旦他“发现”了他的圣杯,达·芬奇就对头骨底座及其周围失去了兴趣。史密斯,2021)。一大批解剖学家和人类学家(这一亚种从布鲁门巴赫(Blumenbach, 1790-1820)的开创性工作开始,就拿着卡尺蜂拥而入,对头骨形状进行研究)提供了关于人类结构和变异的各种见解和(通常是被误导的)理论(例如,古尔德,1981)。这份名单本身就是一篇论文。然而,随着这一领域的演变和变化——从18世纪到20世纪中期的主要兴趣是头骨变异,经常被用作证实种族等级理论的工具(例如,参见莫顿的论文,1839)——在过去的几十年里,焦点越来越多地转移到理解头骨形状模式背后的基本生物学上(参见Fostowicz-Frelik &;曾先生,2023)。这背后是对形成颅骨部分的不同类型组织的兴趣。本期特刊着重于后一个问题,探讨了构成颅骨的不同类型的组织,主要集中在颅底,颅骨本身的关键支架。本期特刊源于《解剖记录》主办的题为“软骨和颅面生长”的研讨会,该研讨会于2022年在科罗拉多州丹佛市举行的美国生物人类学家协会年会上举行(Smith et al., 2025年,本期)。本期特刊由宾西法尼亚州滑石大学健康与康复科学系的Timothy Smith和佛罗里达Gainsville大学人类学系的Valerie DeLeon客座编辑(见图1)。客座编辑都是在我们杂志上发表文章的老手,我们为他们的回归拍拍他们的头盖骨。对他们说几句感谢的话是合适的。Drs。 对我们来说,瓦莱丽和蒂姆是解剖学记录家族的亲密成员,他们现在是各自领域的资深科学家,也是我们杂志的常客(对于合著者JL来说,把这些人看作更“资深”的科学家,使他的缝合速度更快,因为他从他们还是学生的时候就认识他们了!)首先是瓦莱丽,她是颅解剖、发育和组织学方面的世界级专家,尤其是灵长类动物,并多次在我们的杂志上发表她的研究(例如,Organ et al., 2010;负责,史密斯,2014,2025;Lindsay et al., 2015;DeLeon et al., 2016;Smith等人,2013、2016、2017;Selba et al., 2020)。我们必须对她特别好,因为她也是《解剖记录》的母公司——美国解剖学协会的支柱人物,作为该协会的前任主席(在这个角色中,她是一个变革性的领导者,帮助我们协会为许多传统上不涉及解剖学科学的团体打开了机会;瓦莱丽·布拉沃!)瓦莱丽也是律师,所以我们得小心行事。除了史密斯博士之外,蒂姆是我们期刊最有活力、最有成果的副编辑之一,可以说,如果不是世界上最领先的比较灵长类动物组织学家(他谦逊的本性会让他对这样的赞美感到畏缩,但这太糟糕了;这是我们的社论,而且,这是真的!)他在我们的杂志上发表了数十篇论文,使其成为报告他在比较颅骨生长发育方面的创新研究的大本营,特别关注最显著的上层建筑中组织的变形和变化。除了他自己惊人的科学成就之外,史密斯博士还是我们最具创造性的特刊的创始者和先锋,包括:关于灵长类动物的特殊感官(多米尼等人,2004;Laitman, 2004);灵长类动物功能解剖学和生物力学新方法(Organ et al., 2010;Laitman,艾伯丁,2010);脊椎动物鼻子的进化、发育和比较解剖学(Laitman, 2014;Laitman,艾伯丁,2014;van Valkenburgh et al., 2014);两本非同寻常的书,描绘了物种之间的“极端”解剖学(莱特曼&安培;艾伯丁,2020a, 2020b;史密斯,莱特曼,2020a, 2020b);狗与人之间关系的历史、复杂性和解剖学(莱特曼;艾伯丁,2021;史密斯,van Valenburg, 2021);以及蝙蝠的生态形态和感觉生物学(Smith et al., 2023;史密斯2023年;Laitman,史密斯,2023)。除此之外,蒂姆还是一位杰出的艺术家,为他的特刊创作了许多美丽的封面。显然,他还会做饭、打扫卫生,受到配偶和孩子的喜爱,甚至还会照顾无家可归的狗。如果他不是这样一个好人,人们真的会恨他!结合他们的能量,这对软骨/嗜颅者已经招募了一群志同道合的科学家来解决关于软骨与颅面发育的复杂关系的许多问题。事实上,我们对软骨的集体理解超越了其作为软骨内颅成分基础的既定重要性,正在与日俱增。利用来自硬骨鱼、鸟类、海龟、老鼠、蝙蝠、野猪和人类等无数物种的新数据,使用各种比较解剖学、组织学、细胞生物学和遗传学方法,这些研究正在揭示颅面世界中软骨相互作用的许多方面。可以说,这个问题为观察软骨的世界提供了一个新的显微镜,远远超出了我们目前的理解。乔治·奥威尔(George Orwell)在他的小说《一九八四》(1984,Orwell, 1949)中写道:“现实在头骨里。”虽然在奥威尔的反乌托邦小说中,说这句话的角色更多地讲述了思想的力量,但这句话
{"title":"The anatomical record explores the remarkable interface of cartilage and the skull in a new Special Issue","authors":"Jeffrey T. Laitman, Heather F. Smith","doi":"10.1002/ar.25691","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.25691","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Unlike people, not all body parts are equally important. We need our spleens, but can largely do without them. Portions of our intestines can be lost; parts of our liver, pancreas, thyroid, and lobes of our lungs are all needed, of course, but we can, more or less, survive while missing them. And while we have spares, an eye, ear, kidney, limb, tooth, or gonad (ouch!) can go. Even large parts of our heart can be grudgingly removed. But of all body parts, the one we can't be without, the pinnacle of all, is, well, our head! Data has shown that, for most humans, loss of the head significantly decreases the quality of life. Just ask (via a seance) Marie-Antoinette or some of Henry VIII's wives!</p><p>The scaffold for that remarkable and obviously essential region is the skull. Indeed, how this complex framework came to be evolutionarily and developmentally, and the meanderings that occur in disease and pathology, remain a topic of intense study. Many secrets to seminal patterns of animal form and function reside within the nooks and crannies that lie within. Indeed, few areas of human, comparative, evolutionary, and more recently, developmental, anatomy sensu lato, attract as much investigation as those exploring the skull.</p><p>Fascination with the skull probably first occurred when some Pliocene hominid ancestor hit some neighbor atop their head with a rock, heard a cracking sound, and stood fascinated by both the sound and oozing after-effects. In more recent, historical times, systematic exploration of the skull likely appeared with the Egyptians in preparation for mummification processes (see Elhadi et al., <span>2012</span>; Laitman, <span>2015</span>; Laitman & Albertine, <span>2015</span>; Lindsay et al., <span>2015</span>; Marquez et al., <span>2015</span>). Various anatomical explorers visited the skull in the ensuing centuries, each looking at differing aspects of the extraordinary container. Vesalius himself noted observations in cranial variation in his short chapter in the <i>Fabrica</i> itself (Vesalius, <span>1543</span>; see Hast & Garrison, <span>2000</span> for discussion) yet commented relatively little on internal structures and, interestingly, never portrayed structures such as the sinuses. Arguably, among the most intriguing of cranial “anatomists” was Leonardo da Vinci. Leonardo had an unrelenting fascination with the skull, particularly the skull base, the cornerstone of this special issue (vide infra). Leonardo's fascination derived, interestingly, not from his desire to uncover the basic anatomy and structure of the cranial base, but to identify the <i>senso comune</i>, “the seat of the soul,” which was a hot topic in his time and argued to reside somewhere within the cranial domain. Leonardo, never a modest soul, believed he indeed found its location, identifying it to be by the anterior part of what we now call the hypophyseal fossa (we hope you gain new reverence for this structure!) Interestingly, once he “","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"308 7","pages":"1805-1808"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ar.25691","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144130014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The braincase and inner ear of the largest species of legless anguine lizards, Pseudopus apodus, are described in detail based on high-resolution x-ray microcomputed tomography. Here, the ontogeny of its braincase is briefly described. The detailed anatomy of the individual braincase bones of P. apodus is presented and compared with those of the modern anguine species Anguis fragilis and species of Ophisaurus, Dopasia, and Hyalosaurus. Because only the extant species of Anguinae are studied and discussed here, the generic names of modern taxa defined genetically—Ophisaurus (North America), Dopasia (Southeast Asia), and Hyalosaurus (North Africa)—are used here. The shape of the supraoccipital in juveniles was similar for all species found in all three geographic territories. During growth, the shape of the supraoccipital changes significantly in Pseudopus, Dopasia, and Ophisaurus, and its shape is very similar to that in adults of the anguine taxon Ophisauriscus quadrupes from the Middle Eocene of Germany. Instead, the shape of the supraoccipital in the adults of Hyalosaurus and Anguis is very similar to that in the juveniles of Pseudopus, Dopasia, and Ophisaurus. This suggests that paedomorphosis probably played a role in the shape formation of the supraoccipital in Hyalosaurus and Anguis. The morphological and proportional changes in several other braincase structures during ontogeny are also described.
{"title":"Comparative anatomy of the ossified braincase of legless anguine lizard Pseudopus apodus (Pallas, 1775) (Squamata, Anguimorpha)","authors":"Jozef Klembara, Miroslav Hain","doi":"10.1002/ar.25695","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ar.25695","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The braincase and inner ear of the largest species of legless anguine lizards, <i>Pseudopus apodus</i>, are described in detail based on high-resolution x-ray microcomputed tomography. Here, the ontogeny of its braincase is briefly described. The detailed anatomy of the individual braincase bones of <i>P. apodus</i> is presented and compared with those of the modern anguine species <i>Anguis fragilis</i> and species of <i>Ophisaurus</i>, <i>Dopasia</i>, and <i>Hyalosaurus</i>. Because only the extant species of Anguinae are studied and discussed here, the generic names of modern taxa defined genetically—O<i>phisaurus</i> (North America), <i>Dopasia</i> (Southeast Asia), and <i>Hyalosaurus</i> (North Africa)—are used here. The shape of the supraoccipital in juveniles was similar for all species found in all three geographic territories. During growth, the shape of the supraoccipital changes significantly in <i>Pseudopus</i>, <i>Dopasia</i>, and <i>Ophisaurus</i>, and its shape is very similar to that in adults of the anguine taxon <i>Ophisauriscus quadrupes</i> from the Middle Eocene of Germany. Instead, the shape of the supraoccipital in the adults of <i>Hyalosaurus</i> and <i>Anguis</i> is very similar to that in the juveniles of <i>Pseudopus</i>, <i>Dopasia</i>, and <i>Ophisaurus</i>. This suggests that paedomorphosis probably played a role in the shape formation of the supraoccipital in <i>Hyalosaurus</i> and <i>Anguis</i>. The morphological and proportional changes in several other braincase structures during ontogeny are also described.</p>","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"309 2","pages":"346-378"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144130013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}