Pub Date : 2021-06-11DOI: 10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.149
C. Horn
{"title":"2021 Elizabeth Ann Bartholomew Award Zack E. Murrell","authors":"C. Horn","doi":"10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.149","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.149","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50984,"journal":{"name":"Castanea","volume":"86 1","pages":"149 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43108083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-11DOI: 10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.1
Nicole M. Fama, Brandon T. Sinn, Craig F. Barrett
ABSTRACT Mycoheterotrophic plants derive most or all carbon and nutrients from fungal partners and represent poorly understood components of forest biodiversity. Many are rare or endangered yet can be ecological indicators of forest ecosystem function due to fungal host requirements. One such species is the IUCN red-listed (“vulnerable”), fully mycoheterotrophic orchid, Corallorhiza bentleyi. This recently described species is among the rarest plants in Appalachia, known from five counties in Virginia and West Virginia. The species has a restricted range, small population size, and is self-pollinating. Here, an integrative approach was taken in conservation genetic assessment of C. bentleyi using floral morphometrics, simple-sequence repeats, and fungal host DNA to characterize variation within and among sampling localities. Morphology reveals differentiation among individuals from six sampling localities. Surprisingly, most genetic variation is found within localities, contrary to the expectation for a selfing species. Fungal host DNA reveals extreme specificity upon a few genotypes of a single ectomycorrhizal host species, Tomentella fuscocinerea, across all localities. We discuss conservation implications of morphological, genetic, and symbiotic diversity in this vulnerable species, and recommend additional assessment of conservation status based on: an obligate reproductive mode of selfing, preventing benefits of outcrossing among genetically non-identical individuals; extreme host specificity, severely restricting niche space; and highly fragmented habitat under threat from anthropogenic disturbance. This study underscores the importance of integrative conservation assessment, analyzing multiple data sources, and reveals patterns not readily apparent from census-based assessments alone.
{"title":"Integrating Genetics, Morphology, and Fungal Host Specificity in Conservation Studies of a Vulnerable, Selfing, Mycoheterotrophic Orchid (Corallorhiza bentleyi Freudenst.)","authors":"Nicole M. Fama, Brandon T. Sinn, Craig F. Barrett","doi":"10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.1","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Mycoheterotrophic plants derive most or all carbon and nutrients from fungal partners and represent poorly understood components of forest biodiversity. Many are rare or endangered yet can be ecological indicators of forest ecosystem function due to fungal host requirements. One such species is the IUCN red-listed (“vulnerable”), fully mycoheterotrophic orchid, Corallorhiza bentleyi. This recently described species is among the rarest plants in Appalachia, known from five counties in Virginia and West Virginia. The species has a restricted range, small population size, and is self-pollinating. Here, an integrative approach was taken in conservation genetic assessment of C. bentleyi using floral morphometrics, simple-sequence repeats, and fungal host DNA to characterize variation within and among sampling localities. Morphology reveals differentiation among individuals from six sampling localities. Surprisingly, most genetic variation is found within localities, contrary to the expectation for a selfing species. Fungal host DNA reveals extreme specificity upon a few genotypes of a single ectomycorrhizal host species, Tomentella fuscocinerea, across all localities. We discuss conservation implications of morphological, genetic, and symbiotic diversity in this vulnerable species, and recommend additional assessment of conservation status based on: an obligate reproductive mode of selfing, preventing benefits of outcrossing among genetically non-identical individuals; extreme host specificity, severely restricting niche space; and highly fragmented habitat under threat from anthropogenic disturbance. This study underscores the importance of integrative conservation assessment, analyzing multiple data sources, and reveals patterns not readily apparent from census-based assessments alone.","PeriodicalId":50984,"journal":{"name":"Castanea","volume":"86 1","pages":"1 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43186530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-11DOI: 10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.147
Elizabeth McMurchie, A. Weeks, Justin P. Williams, T. Hawkins, Minnie Windler
The Richard and Minnie Windler Award recognizes the authors of the best systematics and ecology papers published in Castanea during the previous year. For 2020, authors of two articles were selected as winners: Elizabeth McMurchie and Andrea Weeks for their article, “Vascular Flora and Ecological Community Assessment of the Blue Ridge Center for Environmental Stewardship, Loudoun County, Virginia” (Castanea 85[1]:42–64), and Justin P. Williams and Tracy S. Hawkins for their article, “Acorn Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Predation Dynamics in a Mississippi Bottomland Hardwood Forest” (Castanea 85[1]:159–168). CASTANEA 86(1): 147–148 MAY Copyright 2019 Southern Appalachian Botanical Society
理查德和米妮·温德勒奖旨在表彰前一年在卡斯塔尼亚发表的最好的系统学和生态学论文的作者。2020年，两篇文章的作者被选为获奖者:Elizabeth McMurchie和Andrea Weeks，他们的文章“弗吉尼亚州卢顿县蓝岭环境管理中心的维管植物群和生态群落评估”(Castanea 85[1]: 42-64)，以及Justin P. Williams和Tracy S. Hawkins，他们的文章“橡子象鼻虫(鞘翅目:Curculionidae)捕食动态在密西西比湖底阔叶林”(Castanea 85[1]: 59 - 168)。南阿巴拉契亚植物学会版权所有2019
{"title":"2021 Richard and Minnie Windler Award Recipients","authors":"Elizabeth McMurchie, A. Weeks, Justin P. Williams, T. Hawkins, Minnie Windler","doi":"10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.147","url":null,"abstract":"The Richard and Minnie Windler Award recognizes the authors of the best systematics and ecology papers published in Castanea during the previous year. For 2020, authors of two articles were selected as winners: Elizabeth McMurchie and Andrea Weeks for their article, “Vascular Flora and Ecological Community Assessment of the Blue Ridge Center for Environmental Stewardship, Loudoun County, Virginia” (Castanea 85[1]:42–64), and Justin P. Williams and Tracy S. Hawkins for their article, “Acorn Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Predation Dynamics in a Mississippi Bottomland Hardwood Forest” (Castanea 85[1]:159–168). CASTANEA 86(1): 147–148 MAY Copyright 2019 Southern Appalachian Botanical Society","PeriodicalId":50984,"journal":{"name":"Castanea","volume":"86 1","pages":"147 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68353808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-11DOI: 10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.100
S. Koptur, Sean R. Pena, Beyte Barrios Roque
ABSTRACT The white, tubular, fragrant flowers of Guettarda scabra (Rubiaceae), rough-leaved velvetseed, open in the evening and are visited by hawkmoths (Sphingidae). Flowers last for one day, and recent observations reveal that butterflies also visit these flowers. Hawkmoths hover over the flower and lower their proboscis into the corolla to collect the nectar. Butterflies land on the petals before inserting their proboscis and may transport pollen on their bodies as well as their mouthparts. We conducted an experiment to determine the importance of each of these guilds for pollination of G. scabra. We excluded day-time visitors from some inflorescences and night-time visitors from others on the same plants (with two controls: some open all the time and some bagged all the time). We maintained this regimen during the entire flowering period of the selected inflorescences over two months and compared fruit set among the treatments. The control-open inflorescences and the night-open inflorescences had substantially higher fruit set than day-open and control-bagged inflorescences. Mean fruit set of day-open plus night-open inflorescences approximated that of control-open inflorescences, and although the fruit set of day-open flowers was small, it differed from bagged controls. Fruit set in G. scabra is determined almost entirely by hawkmoths, but butterflies may be useful as secondary pollinators. As plants flower in months when afternoon and evening rains can extend into the night, morning pollinators may be important. This study provides additional evidence that diurnal pollinators can contribute to the reproduction of predominantly nocturnal pollinated plants.
{"title":"Do Morning Butterfly Visitors Benefit a Night-Flowering Hawkmoth Pollinated Plant?","authors":"S. Koptur, Sean R. Pena, Beyte Barrios Roque","doi":"10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.100","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The white, tubular, fragrant flowers of Guettarda scabra (Rubiaceae), rough-leaved velvetseed, open in the evening and are visited by hawkmoths (Sphingidae). Flowers last for one day, and recent observations reveal that butterflies also visit these flowers. Hawkmoths hover over the flower and lower their proboscis into the corolla to collect the nectar. Butterflies land on the petals before inserting their proboscis and may transport pollen on their bodies as well as their mouthparts. We conducted an experiment to determine the importance of each of these guilds for pollination of G. scabra. We excluded day-time visitors from some inflorescences and night-time visitors from others on the same plants (with two controls: some open all the time and some bagged all the time). We maintained this regimen during the entire flowering period of the selected inflorescences over two months and compared fruit set among the treatments. The control-open inflorescences and the night-open inflorescences had substantially higher fruit set than day-open and control-bagged inflorescences. Mean fruit set of day-open plus night-open inflorescences approximated that of control-open inflorescences, and although the fruit set of day-open flowers was small, it differed from bagged controls. Fruit set in G. scabra is determined almost entirely by hawkmoths, but butterflies may be useful as secondary pollinators. As plants flower in months when afternoon and evening rains can extend into the night, morning pollinators may be important. This study provides additional evidence that diurnal pollinators can contribute to the reproduction of predominantly nocturnal pollinated plants.","PeriodicalId":50984,"journal":{"name":"Castanea","volume":"86 1","pages":"100 - 111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43048367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-11DOI: 10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.143
R. Gardner
{"title":"Wildflowers of the Atlantic Southeast","authors":"R. Gardner","doi":"10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.143","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50984,"journal":{"name":"Castanea","volume":"86 1","pages":"143 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47350483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-11DOI: 10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.28
S. Stephenson
ABSTRACT Myxomycetes (plasmodial slime molds or myxogastrids) have been collected in the Mountain Lake area of southwestern Virginia since 1890, and several recognized authorities on this group of organisms along with numerous other individuals have visited or worked at the University of Virginia Mountain Lake Biological Station. The collective efforts of all these individuals have generated a considerable body of information on myxomycetes. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive annotated checklist of all species of myxomycetes reported from the Mountain Lake area. This checklist contains 166 species in 39 genera. This total is approximately 36% of the total number of species of myxomycetes known from all the eastern United States and is likely to be higher than the total recorded for any area of comparable size in the entire country and perhaps the entire world.
{"title":"Myxomycetes Recorded from the Vicinity of the Mountain Lake Biological Station","authors":"S. Stephenson","doi":"10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.28","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.28","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Myxomycetes (plasmodial slime molds or myxogastrids) have been collected in the Mountain Lake area of southwestern Virginia since 1890, and several recognized authorities on this group of organisms along with numerous other individuals have visited or worked at the University of Virginia Mountain Lake Biological Station. The collective efforts of all these individuals have generated a considerable body of information on myxomycetes. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive annotated checklist of all species of myxomycetes reported from the Mountain Lake area. This checklist contains 166 species in 39 genera. This total is approximately 36% of the total number of species of myxomycetes known from all the eastern United States and is likely to be higher than the total recorded for any area of comparable size in the entire country and perhaps the entire world.","PeriodicalId":50984,"journal":{"name":"Castanea","volume":"86 1","pages":"28 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48113122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-11DOI: 10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.112
Cory O. Harper, Alvin R. Diamond
ABSTRACT Three recent collections of Solanum pseudocapsicum represent the first documentation of this species from Alabama in 27 years, and apparently represent the only extant populations. The habitat of these collections appears to be different from that previously documented in Alabama, although it is not unusual range-wide. Solanum pseudocapsicum was last collected from Alabama in 1993 from Houston County, but searches of that location failed to relocate it. Previously it had been collected from Tallapoosa County (1877), Morgan County (1891), Lee County (1896), and Coosa County (1900), all in upland or ruderal habitats. In 2020 a small population of four plants was discovered on a floodplain near the confluence of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers and a second larger population of approximately 28 plants was located 10 km to the SW on the floodplain of the Alabama River, both in Elmore County. A third population of several dozen plants was discovered on the floodplain of the Tallapoosa River in Montgomery County.
{"title":"Noteworthy Collections: New County Records for Solanum pseudocapsicum (Solanaceae) in Alabama","authors":"Cory O. Harper, Alvin R. Diamond","doi":"10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.112","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Three recent collections of Solanum pseudocapsicum represent the first documentation of this species from Alabama in 27 years, and apparently represent the only extant populations. The habitat of these collections appears to be different from that previously documented in Alabama, although it is not unusual range-wide. Solanum pseudocapsicum was last collected from Alabama in 1993 from Houston County, but searches of that location failed to relocate it. Previously it had been collected from Tallapoosa County (1877), Morgan County (1891), Lee County (1896), and Coosa County (1900), all in upland or ruderal habitats. In 2020 a small population of four plants was discovered on a floodplain near the confluence of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers and a second larger population of approximately 28 plants was located 10 km to the SW on the floodplain of the Alabama River, both in Elmore County. A third population of several dozen plants was discovered on the floodplain of the Tallapoosa River in Montgomery County.","PeriodicalId":50984,"journal":{"name":"Castanea","volume":"86 1","pages":"112 - 116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47479773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-11DOI: 10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.53
Danny J. Gustafson, Richard Porcher, Joel M. Gramling, Samuel Eckert, Brian F. Owens
ABSTRACT Hurricane Hugo was a category five storm in September of 1989 that significantly impacted natural areas along the Carolina coastal plain through wind damage and storm surge flooding. Francis Beidler Forest, an Audubon wildlife sanctuary in Four Holes Swamp, suffered severe damage to its forest canopy. In response to concerns that the rare spring ephemeral Trillium pusillum var. pusillum may be negatively impacted by the loss of the mixed hardwood canopy, we established permanent plots in the spring of 1990 with single leaf, triple leaf, and flowering individuals recorded by Ecology faculty and students at The Citadel. Disruption to the forest canopy would significantly alter forest floor microhabitat conditions negatively affecting T. pusillum var. pusillum population demography. There was no expected negative effect of Hurricane Hugo, and the loss of canopy cover on the population. Evidence suggests that the decrease in canopy cover and increased light was associated with increased flowering. The coefficient of variation, as a measure of cohort variability among years, increased from flowering, to triple leaf, to single leaf across the 29 years of population monitoring. There was a significant positive association between the number of named storms in the previous two and three years and the number of single leaf plants. There was no evidence that the population is decreasing, even though the number of flowering individuals has decreased. The results of this long-term demography suggest that even severe natural disturbances, like hurricanes and tropical storms, may have a positive effect on Trillium population dynamics.
{"title":"Long-term Demography Study of Trillium pusillum var. pusillum Following Hurricane Hugo in 1989","authors":"Danny J. Gustafson, Richard Porcher, Joel M. Gramling, Samuel Eckert, Brian F. Owens","doi":"10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.53","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.53","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Hurricane Hugo was a category five storm in September of 1989 that significantly impacted natural areas along the Carolina coastal plain through wind damage and storm surge flooding. Francis Beidler Forest, an Audubon wildlife sanctuary in Four Holes Swamp, suffered severe damage to its forest canopy. In response to concerns that the rare spring ephemeral Trillium pusillum var. pusillum may be negatively impacted by the loss of the mixed hardwood canopy, we established permanent plots in the spring of 1990 with single leaf, triple leaf, and flowering individuals recorded by Ecology faculty and students at The Citadel. Disruption to the forest canopy would significantly alter forest floor microhabitat conditions negatively affecting T. pusillum var. pusillum population demography. There was no expected negative effect of Hurricane Hugo, and the loss of canopy cover on the population. Evidence suggests that the decrease in canopy cover and increased light was associated with increased flowering. The coefficient of variation, as a measure of cohort variability among years, increased from flowering, to triple leaf, to single leaf across the 29 years of population monitoring. There was a significant positive association between the number of named storms in the previous two and three years and the number of single leaf plants. There was no evidence that the population is decreasing, even though the number of flowering individuals has decreased. The results of this long-term demography suggest that even severe natural disturbances, like hurricanes and tropical storms, may have a positive effect on Trillium population dynamics.","PeriodicalId":50984,"journal":{"name":"Castanea","volume":"86 1","pages":"53 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43454585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-11DOI: 10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.144
R. Muzika
Frederick Paillet and Steven Stephenson are sharing a story with readers. This story is rich with the knowledge, facts and understanding these two scientists have acquired about the Ozark Forest. Ozark Forest Forensics endeavors to describe a forest that to many is unfamiliar. Straddling the western edge of the eastern deciduous forest and the Great plains, the Ozarks are biogeographically, floristically, and climatologically distinct from the adjacent ecological regions. The authors attempt a comprehensive examination of a complex forest that does not characterize easily. Their tone is accessible, almost folksy, as the writers seem to address the reader directly; rather than a book about the Ozark forest, it is a book for those interested in the Ozarks. As they explain early in the book, the information, descriptions, and ideas are directed toward the Ozark sojourner, the hiker casually enjoying the forest. The aim to inform this hiker is admirable and important. In this regard, it serves as sort of reference in that we can imagine a hiker returning home after a long hike in the rugged Ozarks and wanting to know more about the curious plants, trees, geological formation that the hiker observed. While the deliverable is accessible, some of the many examples do require a bit of exploration for the reader. The book, therefore is not simply a field guide, but a field guide that requires some mental processes of the reader. The addition of a glossary does present the “feel” of a reference book! Although the Ozark physiographic region extends into Missouri, parts of Oklahoma, and even a bit into southern Illinois and eastern Kansas, this book is written from a decidedly Arkansas perspective. Given the authors’ familiarity with Arkansas, that is understandable, but there are distinctions in Missouri Ozarks that the reader would not be aware of. More contrast within that region and some examples of the Ozarks outside of Arkansas could help orient the reader more generally. With an Arkansas Ozarks emphasis, this book might disappoint those looking for more insight into Missouri Ozarks, but the authors cover broadly the important elements of the Ozark forest and therefore include many examples and unique areas that do apply to other forests, e.g. Missouri Ozarks. Other substantial ways that this book differs from a more standard field guide or forest history include the discussion of often neglected geological parent material. Geology and soil structure are often neglected when discussing forests and are critical to understanding Ozark communities. However, the intricate details of different geologic formations and the accompanying change in plant species composition could have been developed in more detail, because even slight variation in slope position, topography, and aspect result in dramatic changes in plant communities. The Ozarks include soils that are limestone residuum, sandstone residuum, and exposed igneous material—a wide range that influence
Frederick Paillet和Steven Stephenson正在与读者分享一个故事。这个故事是丰富的知识，事实和理解这两位科学家已经获得了关于奥扎克森林。奥扎克森林法医试图描述一个森林，对许多人来说是陌生的。欧扎克横跨东部落叶林和大平原的西部边缘，在生物地理、植物区系和气候上都与邻近的生态区截然不同。作者试图全面检查一个复杂的森林，不容易表征。他们的语气是平易近人的，几乎是平易近人的，因为作者似乎直接与读者交谈;它不是一本关于奥扎克森林的书，而是一本为那些对奥扎克感兴趣的人写的书。正如他们在书的开头所解释的那样，信息、描述和想法都是针对奥扎克的旅居者，那些随意享受森林的徒步旅行者。告知这位徒步旅行者的目的是令人钦佩和重要的。在这方面，它可以作为一种参考，因为我们可以想象一个徒步旅行者在崎岖的奥扎克长途跋涉后回家，想要更多地了解徒步旅行者所观察到的奇怪的植物、树木和地质构造。虽然可交付的内容是可访问的，但其中的一些示例确实需要读者进行一些探索。因此，这本书不仅仅是一本野外指南，而是一本需要读者进行一些心理过程的野外指南。词汇表的添加确实呈现出参考书的“感觉”!虽然奥扎克的地理区域延伸到密苏里州、俄克拉何马州的部分地区，甚至延伸到伊利诺斯州南部和堪萨斯州东部，但这本书显然是从阿肯色州的角度写的。考虑到作者对阿肯色州的熟悉程度，这是可以理解的，但密苏里州的奥扎克语有一些读者可能没有意识到的区别。该地区内部的更多对比以及阿肯色州以外的奥扎克人的一些例子可以帮助读者更普遍地定位。这本书以阿肯色州奥扎克为重点，可能会让那些想要深入了解密苏里奥扎克的人失望，但作者广泛地涵盖了奥扎克森林的重要元素，因此包括了许多适用于其他森林的例子和独特的区域，例如密苏里奥扎克。其他实质性的方式，这本书不同于一个更标准的野外指南或森林历史包括经常被忽视的地质母材料的讨论。在讨论森林时，地质和土壤结构往往被忽视，而这对了解欧扎克社区至关重要。然而，不同地质构造的复杂细节以及伴随而来的植物物种组成的变化可以得到更详细的研究，因为即使坡位、地形和坡向的微小变化也会导致植物群落的剧烈变化。奥扎克的土壤包括石灰石残渣、砂岩残渣和暴露的火成岩物质——范围很广，对植物和动物群落的影响既明显又细微。有时这种风格略显深奥。例如，在“其他森林领域”这一章中，“领域”这个词指的是什么并不清楚。读完这一章，似乎“领域”可以指自然群落、生态土地类型，或者仅仅是不同的森林类型。向读者介绍这些术语将澄清其他复杂的主题。读者可以从作者对密苏里州和奥扎克州森林扰动的丰富研究中获益。描述火灾历史、风事件等的年表
{"title":"Ozark Forest Forensics","authors":"R. Muzika","doi":"10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.144","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.144","url":null,"abstract":"Frederick Paillet and Steven Stephenson are sharing a story with readers. This story is rich with the knowledge, facts and understanding these two scientists have acquired about the Ozark Forest. Ozark Forest Forensics endeavors to describe a forest that to many is unfamiliar. Straddling the western edge of the eastern deciduous forest and the Great plains, the Ozarks are biogeographically, floristically, and climatologically distinct from the adjacent ecological regions. The authors attempt a comprehensive examination of a complex forest that does not characterize easily. Their tone is accessible, almost folksy, as the writers seem to address the reader directly; rather than a book about the Ozark forest, it is a book for those interested in the Ozarks. As they explain early in the book, the information, descriptions, and ideas are directed toward the Ozark sojourner, the hiker casually enjoying the forest. The aim to inform this hiker is admirable and important. In this regard, it serves as sort of reference in that we can imagine a hiker returning home after a long hike in the rugged Ozarks and wanting to know more about the curious plants, trees, geological formation that the hiker observed. While the deliverable is accessible, some of the many examples do require a bit of exploration for the reader. The book, therefore is not simply a field guide, but a field guide that requires some mental processes of the reader. The addition of a glossary does present the “feel” of a reference book! Although the Ozark physiographic region extends into Missouri, parts of Oklahoma, and even a bit into southern Illinois and eastern Kansas, this book is written from a decidedly Arkansas perspective. Given the authors’ familiarity with Arkansas, that is understandable, but there are distinctions in Missouri Ozarks that the reader would not be aware of. More contrast within that region and some examples of the Ozarks outside of Arkansas could help orient the reader more generally. With an Arkansas Ozarks emphasis, this book might disappoint those looking for more insight into Missouri Ozarks, but the authors cover broadly the important elements of the Ozark forest and therefore include many examples and unique areas that do apply to other forests, e.g. Missouri Ozarks. Other substantial ways that this book differs from a more standard field guide or forest history include the discussion of often neglected geological parent material. Geology and soil structure are often neglected when discussing forests and are critical to understanding Ozark communities. However, the intricate details of different geologic formations and the accompanying change in plant species composition could have been developed in more detail, because even slight variation in slope position, topography, and aspect result in dramatic changes in plant communities. The Ozarks include soils that are limestone residuum, sandstone residuum, and exposed igneous material—a wide range that influence","PeriodicalId":50984,"journal":{"name":"Castanea","volume":"86 1","pages":"144 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47458841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-11DOI: 10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.22
Eathan Gentry, B. Booth, J. C. Landolt, S. Stephenson
ABSTRACT Samples for isolation of dictyostelid cellular slime molds (dictyostelids) were collected from two types of glades (limestone and dolomite) in northwest Arkansas. Glades are non-forest habitats which typically have shallow and usually rather xeric soils. As such, they would not appear to be particularly suitable for dictyostelids. In the present study, only seven species were recovered, and just three of these were recorded from both limestone and dolomite glades. Total densities (clones/gram) were rather low for both types of glades, with 25 clones/gram in dolomite glades and 23 clones/gram in limestone glades.
{"title":"Scientific Note: Dictyostelid Cellular Slime Molds Associated with Limestone and Dolomite Glades in Northwest Arkansas","authors":"Eathan Gentry, B. Booth, J. C. Landolt, S. Stephenson","doi":"10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2179/0008-7475.86.1.22","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Samples for isolation of dictyostelid cellular slime molds (dictyostelids) were collected from two types of glades (limestone and dolomite) in northwest Arkansas. Glades are non-forest habitats which typically have shallow and usually rather xeric soils. As such, they would not appear to be particularly suitable for dictyostelids. In the present study, only seven species were recovered, and just three of these were recorded from both limestone and dolomite glades. Total densities (clones/gram) were rather low for both types of glades, with 25 clones/gram in dolomite glades and 23 clones/gram in limestone glades.","PeriodicalId":50984,"journal":{"name":"Castanea","volume":"86 1","pages":"22 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47178857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：