Sportverletzung-Sportschaden最新文献

The proximal hamstring complex is a highly vulnerable area that is especially prone to injury. Proximal hamstring tendinopathies (PHTs) remain challenging in diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and prevention due to a large variety of different injuries, slow healing response, persistent symptoms, and functional impairments. PHTs are often misdiagnosed or underdiagnosed, leading to delayed treatment and therapy failure. In addition, many athletes are at a high risk of PHT recurrence, a leading cause of prolonged rehabilitation and impaired individual performance. Until now, there have been no clear criteria for the diagnosis and classification of PHT. Tendinopathies can be graded based on their symptoms and onset. Additionally, radiological characteristics exist that describe the severity of tendinopathies. The diagnosis usually includes a battery of pain provocation tests, functional tests, and imaging to ensure a proper classification. Understanding the specific tasks in the pathogenesis and diagnostic process of PHT requires knowledge of functional anatomy, injury pattern and pathophysiological mechanisms as well as examination and imaging techniques. This work provides a structured overview of the pathogenesis and diagnostic work-up of PHT, emphasizing structured examination and imaging to enable a reliable diagnosis and rapid treatment decisions.

In recent years, professional and non-professional bouldering have seen a fundamental change in movement patterns towards complex movement sequences. This is associated with increased demands on the musculoskeletal system, especially the lower extremities, which can lead to new injury patterns. In the course of our clinical work, we have already seen an increasing number of lower extremity injuries after run-and-jump sequences, with a severe one being highlighted in this case report.

Injuries effect the performance of athletes. Severity of injuries is determined by time loss and sporting performance reduction. To treat injuries adequately, it is necessary to get an overview of varied injuries types in different sports disciplines. In a retrospective study 7.809 athletes from Germany, Switzerland and Austria competing in competitive or recreational levels of sports were included. Injury prevalence was highest in team sports (75 %), followed by combat (64 %), racquet (54 %) and track and field (51 %). Knee (28 %) and shoulder (14 %) were the most at risk joints. Time loss in sporting activity after injury was longest in the region of knee (26 weeks). Of all reported injuries, 48 % were accompanied by a reduced level of performance. The highest injury prevalence occurred in the year 2016 (45 %). More injuries occurred during training (58 %) compared to competition (42 %). Across Olympic disciplines, a large number of injuries occurred during training sessions. Injury frequency increased as the Olympic games drew closer. Knee and shoulder injuries were the most severe injuries with respect to time loss and reduction sporting performance.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the intertester reliability and validity of the Lever Sign Test. Intertester reliability has received little attention in previous studies. In order to make comparisons with other studies, the intertester reliability and validity of the Lachman and Anterior Drawer Tests were also calculated.

Patients/material and methods: Patients between 18 and 50 years of age with suspected ligament and/or meniscus injuries were included. Exclusion criteria were suspected malignant, systemic, or central neurologic disease, acute cartilage injury, suspected fracture, or knowledge of the participant's knee findings. Testing was randomized and blinded by an experienced orthopaedic surgeon and a physical therapist. Cohen's kappa was calculated for intertester reliability. Sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratio were calculated. MRI findings were used as the gold standard.

Results: Thirty-six patients were enrolled in the study, 27 male (75%) and 9 female (25%). The prevalence of anterior cruciate ligament lesions was 44.4%. Cohen's kappa (κ) was κ=0.6 (CI 95% [0.29, 0.91]) for the Lever Sign Test, κ=0.64 (CI 95% [0.35, 0.93]) for the Lachman test, and κ=0.63 (CI 95% [0.3, 0.95]) for the Anterior Drawer Test. The sensitivity of the Lever Sign Test was 0.53 and 0.40 for the orthopaedic surgeon and physical therapist, respectively, specificity was 0.89 and 0.79, the positive predictive value was 0.80 and 0.60, the negative predictive value was 0.70 and 0.62, the positive likelihood ratio was 4.80 and 1.90, respectively, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.76 and 0.53.

Conclusion: The estimated intertester reliability of the Lever Sign Test was good. The Lever Sign Test is suitable as a complement to the Lachman Test, which is considered the most valid test in the literature. The weaknesses and ambiguities of the operating mechanism of the Lever Sign Test should not be ignored and should be further explored.

Background: Sports injuries may have severe implications for an athlete's career. Psychological factors play an important role on an athlete's journey from the injury to the return to competitive sports. These factors are often insufficiently evaluated, which may lead to prolonged downtime. The Athlete Fear Avoidance Questionnaire (AFAQ) may be used to measure fear avoidance patterns in injured athletes. There is no validated German version of the questionnaire at this time.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the test-retest reliability, internal consistency and construct validity of the transculturally translated German version of the AFAQ (AFAQ_D) in injured athletes.

Method: The German version of the AFAQ_D was translated using the TRAPD model. Construct validity was evaluated with correlations to the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). Internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach's Alpha, while the interclass coefficient was used to calculate test-retest reliability.

Results: This study included 64 athletes aged 16 to 36 years (Ø 23.15 years, ♀ 17%, ♂ 83%) after a variety of injuries. The AFAQ_D yielded good reliability values with Crohnbach's Alpha being 0.76 (95%CI; 0.67-0.84) in the first measurement and 0.82 (95%CI; 0.76-0.88) in the second measurement, and the interclass coefficient being 0.798 (95%CI; 0.674-0.876). Regarding validity, a moderate correlation was found between the AFAQ_D and the TSK (r=0.57, p<0.01), and a weak and non-significant correlation was found between the AFAQ_D and the FABQ (r=0.13, p=0.31).

Conclusion: By and large, the German version of the AFAQ is a valid and reliable questionnaire to evaluate fear avoidance as well as the psychological readiness of athletes after an injury. Correlations with TSK and FABQ are roughly comparable with the original study.

A literature search was conducted to systematically review and meta-analyse time-loss and recurrence rates of lateral ankle sprains (LAS) in male professional football players. Six electronic databases were screened separately for time-loss and recurrence rates after lateral ankle sprains in elite football players. A total of 13 (recurrence) and 12 (time-loss) studies met the previously defined inclusion criteria. The total sample size of the recurrence studies was 36.201 participants (44.404 overall initial injuries, 7944 initial ankle sprain (AS) injuries, 1193 recurrent AS injuries). 16.442 professional football players (4893 initial AS injuries, 748 recurrent AS injuries) were subsequently meta-analysed. A recurrence rate of 17.11% (95% CI: 13.31-20.92%; df=12; Q=19.53; I²=38.57%) was determined based on the random-effects model. A total of 7736 participants were part of the time-loss studies (35.888 total injuries, 4848 total ankle injuries; 3370 AS injuries). Out of the 7736 participants, 7337 participants met the inclusion criteria with a total of 3346 AS injuries. The average time-loss was 15 days (weighted mean: 15.92, median: 14.95, min: 9.55; max: 52.9). A priori, we determined considerable heterogeneity (CI: 18.15-22.08; df=11; Q=158; I²=93%). There is an average time-loss of 15 days per LAS and a recurrence rate of 17%. LAS is one of the most common types of injury with high recurrence rates in professional football players. The high recurrence rates and long-term consequences show the necessity for research in the field of LAS in elite football. However, heterogeneous data lead to difficulties regarding the aspect of comparability.

Objectives: Iliac endofibrosis (IE) is a rare arterial disease in endurance athletes, especially cyclists and triathletes. The diagnosis is considered challenging and the latency from the onset of initial symptoms to diagnosis is often several years. Diagnostic options include determination of the ankle brachial index (ABI) after maximal exercise as a non-invasive procedure, as well as duplex sonography, CT or MRI angiography, and invasive angiography. The aim of this paper is to analyse in more detail this time lag to correct diagnosis from the first description in 1985 to the year 2021, as well as to identify the most important diagnostic tools for practice.

Materials and methods: Literature research according to PRISMA criteria in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane databases, supplemented by a search in Google Scholar up to 10/18/2021.

Results: We identified a total of 133 publications that dealt thematically with IE in endurance athletes. In 42 publications (40 case reports and 2 clinical trials), the diagnosis was confirmed intraoperatively, and in 32 (32/42; 74.4%), statements were made about the duration from the onset of the first symptoms to the final diagnosis (mean 45, median 36 months). This latency was constant over the entire observation period from 1985 to 2021, with no trend toward shortening. Twenty-four papers (24/42; 56%) reported detailed results of ABI determination as well as further diagnostic testing. In all cases, the ABI value decreased to less than 0.66 (in 5 case reports, this decrease was measured at rest; in 19 case reports, it occurred after stress), whereas further diagnostic testing by duplex sonography, DSA, MRA, or CTA revealed no abnormal findings in 3 cases (3/24; 12.5%) and showed no more than minor stenosis in 14 cases (14/24; 58.3%).

Conclusions: A drop in ABI after exercise is the most reliable method to diagnose iliac endofibrosis. This non-invasive and easy-to-perform examination should be integrated into the performance diagnostics of highly ambitious endurance athletes at risk. This may ideally prevent irreversible vessel wall damage by early diagnosis as well as a reduction of the presumed high number of undetected cases.

Rink Hockey is a high-speed low-contact sport with a widely recognized injury potential. Played with a hard ball by players wearing little or no protective gear, the rates of concussions and head injuries are of high interest. In this study, we reviewed and investigated injuries sustained by 108 German National League rink hockey players. We conducted an epidemiological cross-sectional study to determine sport-specific injuries and injury patterns in female and male rink hockey players. Data were collected by a standardized questionnaire. A total of 108 players participated in the study. The combined rate of injuries were 9.4/1000 athlete exposures. There was no significant difference between injury rates during games and practice. A sexspecific difference was not detected. Head injuries were the most frequent type (20.8 % of all injuries). Concussions made up 7 % of all head injuries with a rate of 0.76/1000 athlete exposure. Ball contact was the cause for 31 % of injuries, while player contact generated 26.2 % of all injuries. High rates of ball-contact-related injuries resulted in time loss and medical consultations. Head injuries were frequent, however did not result in significant time loss as compared to other injuries. The use of protective gear should be recommended.

Background: It is unknown which valid criteria should be considered to justify the decision for return to sport (RTS) following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The research question is whether gender, age, the outcome of the isokinetic maximal strength measurement and the single-leg hop test (quantitative/qualitative) influence the decision for RTS nine months after ACLR.

Methods: This study is a retrospective data analysis. The research question was evaluated with a multiple logistic regression analysis (MLR). The dependent variable, RTS yes/no, is based on the decision of the orthopaedist in charge of treatment nine months (±30 days) after ACLR. The following possible influencing factors were investigated: gender, age, limb symmetry index (LSI) of maximal knee extension and knee flexion strength at 60°/sec., LSI of single-leg hop test and evaluation of knee valgus.

Results: Data of 71 patients were included for MLR. The odds ratios (OR) for RTS increased with female gender (OR, 4.808; p=0.035), a higher LSI of maximal strength of knee extension (OR, 1.117; p=0.009) and a higher LSI of the single-leg hop test (OR, 1.125; p=0.020). Age, the LSI of maximal strength of knee flexion and knee valgus had no influence on the RTS decision.

Conclusion: Gender and the limb symmetry indexes of the maximal strength of knee extension and of the single-leg hop test are associated with RTS nine months after ACLR. These results should be considered to optimise rehabilitation after ACLR.

Background: Injuries to the elbow are frequent in judo combat, but studies on down-time and effect on performance after conservative treatments are rare. This issue is particularly relevant for elbow dislocations in high-performance patients such as elite athletes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate (1) time-loss and (2) the regained level of performance in judoka after conservative treatment of simple elbow dislocation.

Methods: In cooperation with the European Judo Union, judoka were asked to complete a 139-item survey regarding elbow injuries they suffered during their career. Besides demographics, injury data, diagnosis and treatment options, the athletes were asked about down-time and reductions in performance level. This study enrolled 108 judoka with conservative treatment of elbow dislocation out of a population of 5426 volunteers.

Results: 69% (n=74) reported a time-loss of less than three months; 6% reported a time-loss of more than six months. The majority (68%, n=73) reported that they had returned to their previous performance level, while 22% (n=24) suffered from a slightly reduced level of performance. In the subgroup of international and national athletes (n=54), 63% returned to judo after less than three months, with 72% achieving the same level and 15% reporting a slightly reduced performance level. Level of performance and time lost after conservative treatment for elbow dislocations were comparable for male and female judoka.

Conclusion: Approximately two out of three judoka returned to the same level of performance after three months of down-time after undergoing conservative therapy for simple elbow dislocations. Despite the high performance level of the study population, conservative treatment of simple elbow dislocation resulted in satisfactory outcomes. The presented data can guide medical professionals and competitive-level contact-sport athletes with respect to expectations in the process of returning to sport.