Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03258-5
M Ishii, A Hamabe, K Okita, T Nishidate, K Okuya, E Akizuki, A Noda, M Miyo, R Miura, M Toyota, K Okamoto, I Takemasa
Introduction: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication after rectal cancer resection, often mitigated by diverting loop ileostomy. However, outlet obstruction remains a significant concern, potentially prolonging hospitalization and requiring reintervention. While surgical risk factors have been explored, patient-specific anatomical factors are less well understood. This study aimed to identify patient-related risk factors for outlet obstruction and evaluate a preventive surgical modification in high-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic rectal cancer surgeries.
Methods: This retrospective study included 318 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic rectal resection with a diverting loop ileostomy. Risk factors were assessed in a control cohort (April 2015-February 2020), followed by a modified ileostomy technique in a validation cohort (March 2020-December 2024).
Results: Increased rectus abdominis muscle thickness (TAM) and larger visceral fat area (AVF) were independent risk factors for outlet obstruction (p = 0.037 and p = 0.041, respectively). Patients with both factors had the highest incidence (52.6%). The modified technique significantly reduced obstruction among high-risk patients (p = 0.003) without increasing parastomal hernia rates.
Conclusions: TAM and AVF are independent predictors of outlet obstruction. A tailored fascial modification reduced obstruction in high-risk patients, supporting the value of preoperative anatomical assessment in surgical planning.
{"title":"Patient-related risk factors for outlet obstruction in diverting loop ileostomy following minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery.","authors":"M Ishii, A Hamabe, K Okita, T Nishidate, K Okuya, E Akizuki, A Noda, M Miyo, R Miura, M Toyota, K Okamoto, I Takemasa","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03258-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03258-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication after rectal cancer resection, often mitigated by diverting loop ileostomy. However, outlet obstruction remains a significant concern, potentially prolonging hospitalization and requiring reintervention. While surgical risk factors have been explored, patient-specific anatomical factors are less well understood. This study aimed to identify patient-related risk factors for outlet obstruction and evaluate a preventive surgical modification in high-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic rectal cancer surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 318 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic rectal resection with a diverting loop ileostomy. Risk factors were assessed in a control cohort (April 2015-February 2020), followed by a modified ileostomy technique in a validation cohort (March 2020-December 2024).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increased rectus abdominis muscle thickness (TAM) and larger visceral fat area (AVF) were independent risk factors for outlet obstruction (p = 0.037 and p = 0.041, respectively). Patients with both factors had the highest incidence (52.6%). The modified technique significantly reduced obstruction among high-risk patients (p = 0.003) without increasing parastomal hernia rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAM and AVF are independent predictors of outlet obstruction. A tailored fascial modification reduced obstruction in high-risk patients, supporting the value of preoperative anatomical assessment in surgical planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145822150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background and aims: Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) is a recognized limitation of colorectal ESD (C-ESD) associated with morbidity, additional costs, and prolonged admission. Reliable closure of C-ESD defects can decrease the incidence of PEECS. We introduce a novel mucomuscular closure technique that involves direct closure of the muscularis propria using through-the-scope clips (TTSC). We evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the modified closure technique in prevention of post-C-ESD PEECS.
Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of consecutive C-ESDs at a single tertiary center between January 2017 and October 2023. Patients who underwent C-ESD with mucomuscular closure or conventional closure with TTSC were enrolled. The primary outcome was the incidence and clinical outcome of PEECS. Secondary outcomes were rates of complete defect closure and severe adverse events (SAEs).
Results: A total of 764 patients were included in this study. The incidence of PEECS was significantly lower in the mucomuscular closure group versus conventional closure group (2.5% versus 15.0%, P < 0.001). No SAEs occurred in mucomuscular closure group, whereas two patients had delayed perforation, and two had delayed bleeding in the conventional closure group. In mucomuscular closure group, there was no difference in PEECS occurrence between complete closure (5/218, 2.3%) and partial closure (3/105, 2.9%). No TTSC-related perforation occurred in the process of defect closure.
Conclusions: Mucomuscular closure with TTSC in C-ESDs is effective in preventing PEECS and other postoperative complications.
背景和目的:内镜下粘膜下剥离(ESD)后电凝综合征(PEECS)是公认的结肠直肠ESD (C-ESD)的局限性,与发病率、额外费用和住院时间延长有关。可靠的C-ESD缺损闭合可降低PEECS的发生率。我们介绍了一种新的肌肌闭合技术,该技术涉及使用贯穿镜夹(TTSC)直接闭合固有肌层。我们评估改良缝合技术预防c - esd后PEECS的可行性和有效性。方法:我们于2017年1月至2023年10月在一个三级中心进行了一项连续c - esd的前瞻性队列研究。接受C-ESD联合肌肉闭合或常规TTSC闭合的患者被纳入研究。主要观察指标为PEECS的发生率和临床结果。次要结果是完全缺陷闭合率和严重不良事件(SAEs)。结果:本研究共纳入764例患者。与常规闭合组相比,肌肌闭合组PEECS发生率明显降低(2.5% vs 15.0%), P结论:TTSC肌肌闭合可有效预防C-ESDs的PEECS及其他术后并发症。
{"title":"Safety outcomes of mucomuscular closure versus conventional clip closure in ESD of large (> 15 mm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs).","authors":"T-Y Chen, L-F Wu, X-Y Xu, Y-B Liu, Y-F Zhang, W-F Chen, Q-L Li, J-W Hu, J-X Xu, J Cheng, K-Q Zhou, P-H Zhou, Y-Q Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03261-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03261-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) is a recognized limitation of colorectal ESD (C-ESD) associated with morbidity, additional costs, and prolonged admission. Reliable closure of C-ESD defects can decrease the incidence of PEECS. We introduce a novel mucomuscular closure technique that involves direct closure of the muscularis propria using through-the-scope clips (TTSC). We evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the modified closure technique in prevention of post-C-ESD PEECS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study of consecutive C-ESDs at a single tertiary center between January 2017 and October 2023. Patients who underwent C-ESD with mucomuscular closure or conventional closure with TTSC were enrolled. The primary outcome was the incidence and clinical outcome of PEECS. Secondary outcomes were rates of complete defect closure and severe adverse events (SAEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 764 patients were included in this study. The incidence of PEECS was significantly lower in the mucomuscular closure group versus conventional closure group (2.5% versus 15.0%, P < 0.001). No SAEs occurred in mucomuscular closure group, whereas two patients had delayed perforation, and two had delayed bleeding in the conventional closure group. In mucomuscular closure group, there was no difference in PEECS occurrence between complete closure (5/218, 2.3%) and partial closure (3/105, 2.9%). No TTSC-related perforation occurred in the process of defect closure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mucomuscular closure with TTSC in C-ESDs is effective in preventing PEECS and other postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145822152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03254-9
J Duelund-Jakobsen, S Buntzen, L Lundby, S Laurberg, M Sørensen, M Rydningen
Introduction: In sacral neuromodulation (SNM), the stimulation intensity is set at the sensory threshold (ST) level. However, subsensory stimulation as low as 50% of ST has proven effective in reducing faecal incontinence episodes.
Aim: To explore the relationship between functional outcomes and varying subsensory stimulation amplitude in newly implanted patients.
Method: This randomised, double-blind study was designed to include patients with ≥ 1 faecal incontinence episodes/week despite maximal conservative therapy. As part of another trial, patients were offered a one-stage procedure. Postoperatively, patients were randomised into two groups. G-1 received stimulation at 0.05 V, at 50% and 90% of the ST in three 4-week periods, followed by 12 weeks of stimulation at the ST. G-2 received stimulation at 90% of the ST in three 4-week periods, followed by 12 weeks of stimulation at ST. Patients were evaluated after each period using St. Marks's Incontinence Score and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for patient satisfaction regarding social function, bowel function and quality-of-life, along with a bowel habit diary.
Results: In total, 73 patients with a median age of 60 years [interquartile range (IQR: 50-69 years)] completed the trial. Faecal incontinence episodes were significantly reduced at all follow-ups, with no differences between groups. The only statistical difference between groups was deltaVAS for bowel function after 4 weeks. In G-1 with ultra-low stimulation amplitude [0.05 V - equivalent to 9.6% (IQR: 6.5-13.4) of ST], the improvement compared with baseline was 30 points (IQR: 10-50) significantly lower than G-2 with an improvement of 50 points (IQR: 10-70) (p-value: 0.05).
Conclusions: Subsensory stimulation is feasible in newly implanted patients with faecal incontinence. An amplitude of 0.05 V is as effective on the functional outcomes as stimulation with higher amplitudes.
{"title":"Sacral neuromodulation with ultra-low stimulation intensity is effective in faecal incontinence - results from a randomised study with a one-stage implant procedure.","authors":"J Duelund-Jakobsen, S Buntzen, L Lundby, S Laurberg, M Sørensen, M Rydningen","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03254-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03254-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In sacral neuromodulation (SNM), the stimulation intensity is set at the sensory threshold (ST) level. However, subsensory stimulation as low as 50% of ST has proven effective in reducing faecal incontinence episodes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the relationship between functional outcomes and varying subsensory stimulation amplitude in newly implanted patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This randomised, double-blind study was designed to include patients with ≥ 1 faecal incontinence episodes/week despite maximal conservative therapy. As part of another trial, patients were offered a one-stage procedure. Postoperatively, patients were randomised into two groups. G-1 received stimulation at 0.05 V, at 50% and 90% of the ST in three 4-week periods, followed by 12 weeks of stimulation at the ST. G-2 received stimulation at 90% of the ST in three 4-week periods, followed by 12 weeks of stimulation at ST. Patients were evaluated after each period using St. Marks's Incontinence Score and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for patient satisfaction regarding social function, bowel function and quality-of-life, along with a bowel habit diary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 73 patients with a median age of 60 years [interquartile range (IQR: 50-69 years)] completed the trial. Faecal incontinence episodes were significantly reduced at all follow-ups, with no differences between groups. The only statistical difference between groups was deltaVAS for bowel function after 4 weeks. In G-1 with ultra-low stimulation amplitude [0.05 V - equivalent to 9.6% (IQR: 6.5-13.4) of ST], the improvement compared with baseline was 30 points (IQR: 10-50) significantly lower than G-2 with an improvement of 50 points (IQR: 10-70) (p-value: 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subsensory stimulation is feasible in newly implanted patients with faecal incontinence. An amplitude of 0.05 V is as effective on the functional outcomes as stimulation with higher amplitudes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12799699/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145829141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03271-8
M Cricrì, A Miele, F P Tropeano, A Zoretti, G D De Palma, G Luglio
Background: Complex perianal fistulas present a significant surgical challenge due to high recurrence rates and the need to preserve sphincter function. Fistula-tract Laser Closure (FiLaC™) is a minimally invasive technique that offers promising results, but incomplete closure of the internal opening remains a major cause of recurrence. To improve outcomes, we propose the FiLaFlap technique, which combines FiLaC™ with a mucosal advancement flap to enhance fistula healing.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent seton removal with the FiLaFlap procedure between January 2023 and September 2024. Postoperative data, including pain levels, complications, continence status, and follow-up outcomes, were collected prospectively. Patients underwent clinical evaluations and 3D endoanal ultrasound assessments at predefined intervals.
Results: A total of 24 patients (58.3% male, mean age 39.4 ± 12.4 years) were included. The mean time between seton placement and FiLaFlap was 5.95 ± 1.78 months. Postoperative pain was low (VAS 2.20 ± 0.97), and no major complications occurred. At 6 months, 91.6% of patients achieved clinical remission, while 83.3% had ultrasound-confirmed healing. Only one patient reported minor incontinence.
Conclusion: The FiLaFlap technique appears to be a safe and potentially effective sphincter-preserving strategy for complex perianal fistulas, demonstrating high remission rates with minimal morbidity. Further studies with larger cohorts and extended follow-up are needed to validate these preliminary findings.
{"title":"A novel sphincter-sparing procedure for seton removal in complex perianal fistulas: the FiLaFlap technique.","authors":"M Cricrì, A Miele, F P Tropeano, A Zoretti, G D De Palma, G Luglio","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03271-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03271-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complex perianal fistulas present a significant surgical challenge due to high recurrence rates and the need to preserve sphincter function. Fistula-tract Laser Closure (FiLaC™) is a minimally invasive technique that offers promising results, but incomplete closure of the internal opening remains a major cause of recurrence. To improve outcomes, we propose the FiLaFlap technique, which combines FiLaC™ with a mucosal advancement flap to enhance fistula healing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent seton removal with the FiLaFlap procedure between January 2023 and September 2024. Postoperative data, including pain levels, complications, continence status, and follow-up outcomes, were collected prospectively. Patients underwent clinical evaluations and 3D endoanal ultrasound assessments at predefined intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 patients (58.3% male, mean age 39.4 ± 12.4 years) were included. The mean time between seton placement and FiLaFlap was 5.95 ± 1.78 months. Postoperative pain was low (VAS 2.20 ± 0.97), and no major complications occurred. At 6 months, 91.6% of patients achieved clinical remission, while 83.3% had ultrasound-confirmed healing. Only one patient reported minor incontinence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FiLaFlap technique appears to be a safe and potentially effective sphincter-preserving strategy for complex perianal fistulas, demonstrating high remission rates with minimal morbidity. Further studies with larger cohorts and extended follow-up are needed to validate these preliminary findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145822122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03246-9
Gabriele Bislenghi, Albert Wolthuis, André D'Hoore
Background: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the standard surgical option for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) wishing to avoid a permanent ileostomy. Single-port (SP) robotic surgery offers enhanced dexterity and visualization, potentially overcoming the limitations of single-port laparoscopy in the confined pelvic cavity. Its role in IPAA for UC is unexplored.
Methods: Patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing SP robotic proctectomy with IPAA at a tertiary center between October 2024 and June 2025 were reviewed. Procedures followed a standardized three-step approach with transanal transection single stapled (TTSS) anastomosis. Feasibility was defined as completion of the procedure without unplanned conversion to multiport laparoscopy, laparotomy, or transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS). Safety by 30-day postoperative morbidity, readmission, and pouch leak rates was analyzed.
Results: A total of 14 patients (median age 34 years; body mass index (BMI) 26.2 kg/m2) were included. Median operative time was 237 min (range 188-317 min). Hospital stay was 5.8 days (range 3-12 days). No conversions occurred; one case required the unplanned placement of additional 5-mm assistant trocar. Four patients (28.5%) developed postoperative complications. The mean Comprehensive Complication Index was 7.6 ± 12.8 (SD). Three patients (21.4%) required readmission within 30 days postoperatively. All patients underwent ileostomy closure at a median of 64 days after IPAA creation.
Conclusions: SP robotic proctectomy with IPAA is feasible and safe in unselected patients with UC, supporting further large prospective evaluation.
{"title":"Single-port robotic restorative proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: first clinical experience and technical insights.","authors":"Gabriele Bislenghi, Albert Wolthuis, André D'Hoore","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03246-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03246-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the standard surgical option for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) wishing to avoid a permanent ileostomy. Single-port (SP) robotic surgery offers enhanced dexterity and visualization, potentially overcoming the limitations of single-port laparoscopy in the confined pelvic cavity. Its role in IPAA for UC is unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing SP robotic proctectomy with IPAA at a tertiary center between October 2024 and June 2025 were reviewed. Procedures followed a standardized three-step approach with transanal transection single stapled (TTSS) anastomosis. Feasibility was defined as completion of the procedure without unplanned conversion to multiport laparoscopy, laparotomy, or transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS). Safety by 30-day postoperative morbidity, readmission, and pouch leak rates was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 patients (median age 34 years; body mass index (BMI) 26.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were included. Median operative time was 237 min (range 188-317 min). Hospital stay was 5.8 days (range 3-12 days). No conversions occurred; one case required the unplanned placement of additional 5-mm assistant trocar. Four patients (28.5%) developed postoperative complications. The mean Comprehensive Complication Index was 7.6 ± 12.8 (SD). Three patients (21.4%) required readmission within 30 days postoperatively. All patients underwent ileostomy closure at a median of 64 days after IPAA creation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SP robotic proctectomy with IPAA is feasible and safe in unselected patients with UC, supporting further large prospective evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12774989/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145829157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03264-7
J Alabbad, S Almutairi, N Alsabagha, H Alhamly, F Alnaqi
Background: The efficacy of adjuvant antibiotic therapy in reducing the rate of fistula following incision and drainage (I and D) of cryptoglandular anorectal abscesses remains controversial. This study evaluated the effect of adjuvant antibiotic therapy on fistula formation rate.
Methods: This retrospective study included all consecutive adult patients who underwent I and D for a cryptoglandular anorectal abscess between January 2011 and December 2024 at a university-affiliated institution. Demographic, clinical, and microbiological culture data were collected. The intervention assessed was adjuvant antibiotic therapy administration for a minimum of 7 days following I and D. The primary outcome compared fistula formation rates at 12 months after I and D between those who received adjuvant antibiotic therapy and those who did not. Secondary outcomes assessed the factors associated with fistula formation.
Results: Of the 770 patients who met inclusion criteria, 60.5% received adjuvant antibiotic therapy. The overall rate of fistula was 6.8%. The overall median time to diagnosis was 15.4 weeks (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.7-31.3). No differences in the fistula formation rate or time to diagnosis were observed between the two groups. Fistula formation was significantly associated with abscess location, whereas diabetes mellitus was less common among patients who developed fistula. In addition, no patient whose abscess culture yielded skin-derived microorganisms developed a fistula. Age > 40 years and intersphincteric abscess were associated with fistula formation in multivariate analysis, while diabetes mellitus demonstrated a negative association.
Conclusions: In this retrospective study, adjuvant antibiotic therapy was not associated with a decreased risk of fistula formation following abscess I and D.
{"title":"Associations between adjuvant antibiotic therapy and fistula formation after incision and drainage of anorectal abscesses: results from a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"J Alabbad, S Almutairi, N Alsabagha, H Alhamly, F Alnaqi","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03264-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03264-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of adjuvant antibiotic therapy in reducing the rate of fistula following incision and drainage (I and D) of cryptoglandular anorectal abscesses remains controversial. This study evaluated the effect of adjuvant antibiotic therapy on fistula formation rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included all consecutive adult patients who underwent I and D for a cryptoglandular anorectal abscess between January 2011 and December 2024 at a university-affiliated institution. Demographic, clinical, and microbiological culture data were collected. The intervention assessed was adjuvant antibiotic therapy administration for a minimum of 7 days following I and D. The primary outcome compared fistula formation rates at 12 months after I and D between those who received adjuvant antibiotic therapy and those who did not. Secondary outcomes assessed the factors associated with fistula formation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 770 patients who met inclusion criteria, 60.5% received adjuvant antibiotic therapy. The overall rate of fistula was 6.8%. The overall median time to diagnosis was 15.4 weeks (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.7-31.3). No differences in the fistula formation rate or time to diagnosis were observed between the two groups. Fistula formation was significantly associated with abscess location, whereas diabetes mellitus was less common among patients who developed fistula. In addition, no patient whose abscess culture yielded skin-derived microorganisms developed a fistula. Age > 40 years and intersphincteric abscess were associated with fistula formation in multivariate analysis, while diabetes mellitus demonstrated a negative association.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective study, adjuvant antibiotic therapy was not associated with a decreased risk of fistula formation following abscess I and D.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145822118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03243-y
S Zheng, Z Xu, F Deng, S Wang, T Qian, P Lin, C Wang, W Wang, Y Xia, L Xu, Z Zhang
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a global health concern, underscoring the importance of effective bowel preparation for diagnostic procedures such as colonoscopy. This randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of orally administered mannitol and polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions for repeat colonoscopy in patients with inadequate bowel preparation.
Methods: This prospective, open-label, noninferiority, blinded end point, randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled patients from two centers. Participants aged 18-75 years with Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores ≤ 1 in any colon segment were included. The study employed a 1-L mannitol or PEG solution, with primary outcomes assessed using BBPS scores. The secondary outcomes included adverse events, taste preferences, and patient satisfaction. A simple randomization strategy was employed, and both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were conducted.
Results: A total of 134 patients were included in the study, and the trial demonstrated the noninferiority of mannitol compared to PEG in achieving adequate bowel preparation (difference 3.0%, 95% confidence interval - 5.0 to 11.0%). Mannitol exhibited favorable trends in BBPS scores, highlighting its effectiveness. The safety profiles of the two solutions were comparable, with a low incidence of adverse events (17.9% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.825). Notably, mannitol outperformed PEG in terms of patient satisfaction and a greater inclination for reuse.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that orally administered mannitol is not inferior to orally administered PEG in patients with inadequate bowel preparation.
Registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05912114. Registered on 12/6/2023.
背景:结直肠癌(CRC)仍然是一个全球性的健康问题,强调了有效的肠道准备对结肠镜检查等诊断程序的重要性。这项随机对照试验旨在比较口服甘露醇和聚乙二醇(PEG)溶液对肠道准备不充分的患者进行重复结肠镜检查的疗效和耐受性。方法:这项前瞻性、开放标签、非劣效性、盲法终点、随机对照临床试验纳入了来自两个中心的患者。年龄在18-75岁之间,任一结肠段波士顿肠准备量表(BBPS)评分≤1分的参与者被纳入研究。该研究采用1升甘露醇或PEG溶液,主要结果使用BBPS评分评估。次要结局包括不良事件、口味偏好和患者满意度。采用简单的随机化策略,并进行意向治疗(ITT)和每个方案(PP)分析。结果:研究共纳入134例患者,试验证明甘露醇与PEG相比在实现充分的肠道准备方面具有非劣效性(差异3.0%,95%置信区间- 5.0至11.0%)。甘露醇在BBPS评分中表现出良好的趋势,突出了其有效性。两种方案的安全性具有可比性,不良事件发生率较低(17.9% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.825)。值得注意的是,甘露醇在患者满意度和更大的重复使用倾向方面优于PEG。结论:研究结果表明,口服甘露醇对肠准备不充分患者的治疗效果并不逊于口服聚乙二醇。注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05912114。于2023年6月12日注册
{"title":"Comparing the efficacy of mannitol and polyethylene glycol in treating patients with poor bowel preparation: a randomized controlled clinical study.","authors":"S Zheng, Z Xu, F Deng, S Wang, T Qian, P Lin, C Wang, W Wang, Y Xia, L Xu, Z Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03243-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03243-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a global health concern, underscoring the importance of effective bowel preparation for diagnostic procedures such as colonoscopy. This randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of orally administered mannitol and polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions for repeat colonoscopy in patients with inadequate bowel preparation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, open-label, noninferiority, blinded end point, randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled patients from two centers. Participants aged 18-75 years with Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores ≤ 1 in any colon segment were included. The study employed a 1-L mannitol or PEG solution, with primary outcomes assessed using BBPS scores. The secondary outcomes included adverse events, taste preferences, and patient satisfaction. A simple randomization strategy was employed, and both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 134 patients were included in the study, and the trial demonstrated the noninferiority of mannitol compared to PEG in achieving adequate bowel preparation (difference 3.0%, 95% confidence interval - 5.0 to 11.0%). Mannitol exhibited favorable trends in BBPS scores, highlighting its effectiveness. The safety profiles of the two solutions were comparable, with a low incidence of adverse events (17.9% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.825). Notably, mannitol outperformed PEG in terms of patient satisfaction and a greater inclination for reuse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that orally administered mannitol is not inferior to orally administered PEG in patients with inadequate bowel preparation.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05912114. Registered on 12/6/2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12775070/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145829029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03253-w
Z Zheng, Z Chen, X Wang, D Ye, X Lu, Y Huang, P Chi
Background: Internal hernia with small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal resection is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication, especially when it occurs after left hemicolectomy. While several studies have suggested that the closure of mesenteric defects may prevent internal hernias, the optimal preventive strategy has yet to be determined.
Methods: We describe a surgical technique designed to reduce the risk of internal hernia after left-sided colorectal resection, involving complete mobilization of the proximal jejunum, followed by its alignment and fixation to the epiploic appendages over the reconstructed left mesocolon.
Results: From November 2024 to February 2025, the aforementioned surgical procedures were successfully performed in 25 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection with splenic flexure mobilization. No symptomatic or asymptomatic internal hernias were observed during the follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan (3-6 months).
Conclusions: This novel technique has the potential to reduce internal hernias. Further studies are required.
{"title":"Novel and simple technique to prevent internal hernias after laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resection: alignment and fixation of the proximal jejunum.","authors":"Z Zheng, Z Chen, X Wang, D Ye, X Lu, Y Huang, P Chi","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03253-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03253-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Internal hernia with small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal resection is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication, especially when it occurs after left hemicolectomy. While several studies have suggested that the closure of mesenteric defects may prevent internal hernias, the optimal preventive strategy has yet to be determined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe a surgical technique designed to reduce the risk of internal hernia after left-sided colorectal resection, involving complete mobilization of the proximal jejunum, followed by its alignment and fixation to the epiploic appendages over the reconstructed left mesocolon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From November 2024 to February 2025, the aforementioned surgical procedures were successfully performed in 25 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection with splenic flexure mobilization. No symptomatic or asymptomatic internal hernias were observed during the follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan (3-6 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel technique has the potential to reduce internal hernias. Further studies are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12743020/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145822163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03270-9
Zi Qin Ng, Jih Huei Tan
This case report describes the laparoscopic technique of infrapyloric lymph node dissection as part of a complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right-sided colon cancer. While controversial and not routinely performed, this extended dissection is indicated in the presence of specific risk factors for nodal metastasis, such as elevated CEA (> 17 ng/ml) and obstructive symptoms, as presented in our 88-year-old patient. The article outlines the key surgical steps to safely clear the infrapyloric region, emphasizing ligation of the right gastroepiploic vessels and meticulous dissection to minimize bleeding and chyle leakage.
{"title":"Laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy with CME, CVL and division of right gastroepiploic vessels.","authors":"Zi Qin Ng, Jih Huei Tan","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03270-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03270-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This case report describes the laparoscopic technique of infrapyloric lymph node dissection as part of a complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right-sided colon cancer. While controversial and not routinely performed, this extended dissection is indicated in the presence of specific risk factors for nodal metastasis, such as elevated CEA (> 17 ng/ml) and obstructive symptoms, as presented in our 88-year-old patient. The article outlines the key surgical steps to safely clear the infrapyloric region, emphasizing ligation of the right gastroepiploic vessels and meticulous dissection to minimize bleeding and chyle leakage.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145811949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03266-5
Marije A Boom, Esther C J Consten
{"title":"Mesh in rectopexy: biological, synthetic, or hybrid?","authors":"Marije A Boom, Esther C J Consten","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03266-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03266-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12727842/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145811942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}