首页 > 最新文献

Techniques in Coloproctology最新文献

英文 中文
A novel sphincter-sparing procedure for seton removal in complex perianal fistulas: the FiLaFlap technique. 一种保留括约肌的新方法:FiLaFlap技术。
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03271-8
M Cricrì, A Miele, F P Tropeano, A Zoretti, G D De Palma, G Luglio

Background: Complex perianal fistulas present a significant surgical challenge due to high recurrence rates and the need to preserve sphincter function. Fistula-tract Laser Closure (FiLaC™) is a minimally invasive technique that offers promising results, but incomplete closure of the internal opening remains a major cause of recurrence. To improve outcomes, we propose the FiLaFlap technique, which combines FiLaC™ with a mucosal advancement flap to enhance fistula healing.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent seton removal with the FiLaFlap procedure between January 2023 and September 2024. Postoperative data, including pain levels, complications, continence status, and follow-up outcomes, were collected prospectively. Patients underwent clinical evaluations and 3D endoanal ultrasound assessments at predefined intervals.

Results: A total of 24 patients (58.3% male, mean age 39.4 ± 12.4 years) were included. The mean time between seton placement and FiLaFlap was 5.95 ± 1.78 months. Postoperative pain was low (VAS 2.20 ± 0.97), and no major complications occurred. At 6 months, 91.6% of patients achieved clinical remission, while 83.3% had ultrasound-confirmed healing. Only one patient reported minor incontinence.

Conclusion: The FiLaFlap technique appears to be a safe and potentially effective sphincter-preserving strategy for complex perianal fistulas, demonstrating high remission rates with minimal morbidity. Further studies with larger cohorts and extended follow-up are needed to validate these preliminary findings.

背景:复杂的肛周瘘管由于其高复发率和需要保持括约肌功能,是一项重大的手术挑战。瘘管激光闭合(FiLaC™)是一种微创技术,提供了很好的结果,但内部开口的不完全闭合仍然是复发的主要原因。为了改善结果,我们提出了FiLaFlap技术,该技术将FiLaC™与粘膜推进瓣相结合,以增强瘘愈合。方法:我们对2023年1月至2024年9月期间使用FiLaFlap手术去除seton的患者进行了回顾性研究。前瞻性地收集术后数据,包括疼痛水平、并发症、失禁状态和随访结果。患者在预定的时间间隔内接受临床评估和三维肛管超声评估。结果:共纳入24例患者,其中男性58.3%,平均年龄39.4±12.4岁。放置seton和FiLaFlap的平均时间为5.95±1.78个月。术后疼痛低(VAS 2.20±0.97),无重大并发症发生。6个月时,91.6%的患者达到临床缓解,83.3%的患者超声证实愈合。只有一名患者报告了轻微的尿失禁。结论:对于复杂的肛周瘘管,FiLaFlap技术似乎是一种安全且潜在有效的保留括约肌的策略,具有高缓解率和低发病率。进一步的研究需要更大的队列和延长的随访来验证这些初步发现。
{"title":"A novel sphincter-sparing procedure for seton removal in complex perianal fistulas: the FiLaFlap technique.","authors":"M Cricrì, A Miele, F P Tropeano, A Zoretti, G D De Palma, G Luglio","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03271-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03271-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complex perianal fistulas present a significant surgical challenge due to high recurrence rates and the need to preserve sphincter function. Fistula-tract Laser Closure (FiLaC™) is a minimally invasive technique that offers promising results, but incomplete closure of the internal opening remains a major cause of recurrence. To improve outcomes, we propose the FiLaFlap technique, which combines FiLaC™ with a mucosal advancement flap to enhance fistula healing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent seton removal with the FiLaFlap procedure between January 2023 and September 2024. Postoperative data, including pain levels, complications, continence status, and follow-up outcomes, were collected prospectively. Patients underwent clinical evaluations and 3D endoanal ultrasound assessments at predefined intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 patients (58.3% male, mean age 39.4 ± 12.4 years) were included. The mean time between seton placement and FiLaFlap was 5.95 ± 1.78 months. Postoperative pain was low (VAS 2.20 ± 0.97), and no major complications occurred. At 6 months, 91.6% of patients achieved clinical remission, while 83.3% had ultrasound-confirmed healing. Only one patient reported minor incontinence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FiLaFlap technique appears to be a safe and potentially effective sphincter-preserving strategy for complex perianal fistulas, demonstrating high remission rates with minimal morbidity. Further studies with larger cohorts and extended follow-up are needed to validate these preliminary findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12823693/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145822122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sacral neuromodulation with ultra-low stimulation intensity is effective in faecal incontinence - results from a randomised study with a one-stage implant procedure. 超低刺激强度的骶神经调节对大便失禁有效——一项一期植入手术的随机研究结果。
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03254-9
J Duelund-Jakobsen, S Buntzen, L Lundby, S Laurberg, M Sørensen, M Rydningen

Introduction: In sacral neuromodulation (SNM), the stimulation intensity is set at the sensory threshold (ST) level. However, subsensory stimulation as low as 50% of ST has proven effective in reducing faecal incontinence episodes.

Aim: To explore the relationship between functional outcomes and varying subsensory stimulation amplitude in newly implanted patients.

Method: This randomised, double-blind study was designed to include patients with ≥ 1 faecal incontinence episodes/week despite maximal conservative therapy. As part of another trial, patients were offered a one-stage procedure. Postoperatively, patients were randomised into two groups. G-1 received stimulation at 0.05 V, at 50% and 90% of the ST in three 4-week periods, followed by 12 weeks of stimulation at the ST. G-2 received stimulation at 90% of the ST in three 4-week periods, followed by 12 weeks of stimulation at ST. Patients were evaluated after each period using St. Marks's Incontinence Score and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for patient satisfaction regarding social function, bowel function and quality-of-life, along with a bowel habit diary.

Results: In total, 73 patients with a median age of 60 years [interquartile range (IQR: 50-69 years)] completed the trial. Faecal incontinence episodes were significantly reduced at all follow-ups, with no differences between groups. The only statistical difference between groups was deltaVAS for bowel function after 4 weeks. In G-1 with ultra-low stimulation amplitude [0.05 V - equivalent to 9.6% (IQR: 6.5-13.4) of ST], the improvement compared with baseline was 30 points (IQR: 10-50) significantly lower than G-2 with an improvement of 50 points (IQR: 10-70) (p-value: 0.05).

Conclusions: Subsensory stimulation is feasible in newly implanted patients with faecal incontinence. An amplitude of 0.05 V is as effective on the functional outcomes as stimulation with higher amplitudes.

在骶神经调节(SNM)中,刺激强度被设定在感觉阈值(ST)水平。然而,低至50% ST的亚感觉刺激已被证明对减少大便失禁发作有效。目的:探讨新植入术患者亚感觉刺激幅度变化与功能结局的关系。方法:这项随机、双盲研究纳入了尽管采用了最大限度的保守治疗,但每周仍有≥1次大便失禁发作的患者。作为另一项试验的一部分,患者接受了一期手术。术后将患者随机分为两组。g - 1收到刺激在0.05 V级,在50%和90%的圣三四周时间,其次是12周的刺激在圣g2收到刺激圣三四周时间的90%,紧随其后的是12周的刺激在圣患者评估每一段时间后使用圣马克的失禁评分和视觉模拟量表(血管)病人满意度关于社会功能,肠道功能和生活质量以及排便习惯的日记。结果:共有73例患者完成了试验,中位年龄为60岁[四分位间距(IQR: 50-69岁)]。在所有随访中,大便失禁事件明显减少,组间无差异。组间唯一的统计学差异是4周后肠功能的delta avas。G-1超低刺激幅度[0.05 V -相当于ST的9.6% (IQR: 6.5-13.4)]较基线改善30分(IQR: 10-50),显著低于G-2改善50分(IQR: 10-70) (p值:0.05)。结论:亚感觉刺激治疗新植入式大便失禁是可行的。0.05 V的振幅与更高振幅的刺激对功能结果同样有效。
{"title":"Sacral neuromodulation with ultra-low stimulation intensity is effective in faecal incontinence - results from a randomised study with a one-stage implant procedure.","authors":"J Duelund-Jakobsen, S Buntzen, L Lundby, S Laurberg, M Sørensen, M Rydningen","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03254-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03254-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In sacral neuromodulation (SNM), the stimulation intensity is set at the sensory threshold (ST) level. However, subsensory stimulation as low as 50% of ST has proven effective in reducing faecal incontinence episodes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the relationship between functional outcomes and varying subsensory stimulation amplitude in newly implanted patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This randomised, double-blind study was designed to include patients with ≥ 1 faecal incontinence episodes/week despite maximal conservative therapy. As part of another trial, patients were offered a one-stage procedure. Postoperatively, patients were randomised into two groups. G-1 received stimulation at 0.05 V, at 50% and 90% of the ST in three 4-week periods, followed by 12 weeks of stimulation at the ST. G-2 received stimulation at 90% of the ST in three 4-week periods, followed by 12 weeks of stimulation at ST. Patients were evaluated after each period using St. Marks's Incontinence Score and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for patient satisfaction regarding social function, bowel function and quality-of-life, along with a bowel habit diary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 73 patients with a median age of 60 years [interquartile range (IQR: 50-69 years)] completed the trial. Faecal incontinence episodes were significantly reduced at all follow-ups, with no differences between groups. The only statistical difference between groups was deltaVAS for bowel function after 4 weeks. In G-1 with ultra-low stimulation amplitude [0.05 V - equivalent to 9.6% (IQR: 6.5-13.4) of ST], the improvement compared with baseline was 30 points (IQR: 10-50) significantly lower than G-2 with an improvement of 50 points (IQR: 10-70) (p-value: 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subsensory stimulation is feasible in newly implanted patients with faecal incontinence. An amplitude of 0.05 V is as effective on the functional outcomes as stimulation with higher amplitudes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12799699/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145829141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Single-port robotic restorative proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: first clinical experience and technical insights. 单孔机器人修复性直肠切除术与回肠袋-肛门吻合术治疗溃疡性结肠炎:首次临床经验和技术见解。
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03246-9
Gabriele Bislenghi, Albert Wolthuis, André D'Hoore

Background: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the standard surgical option for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) wishing to avoid a permanent ileostomy. Single-port (SP) robotic surgery offers enhanced dexterity and visualization, potentially overcoming the limitations of single-port laparoscopy in the confined pelvic cavity. Its role in IPAA for UC is unexplored.

Methods: Patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing SP robotic proctectomy with IPAA at a tertiary center between October 2024 and June 2025 were reviewed. Procedures followed a standardized three-step approach with transanal transection single stapled (TTSS) anastomosis. Feasibility was defined as completion of the procedure without unplanned conversion to multiport laparoscopy, laparotomy, or transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS). Safety by 30-day postoperative morbidity, readmission, and pouch leak rates was analyzed.

Results: A total of 14 patients (median age 34 years; body mass index (BMI) 26.2 kg/m2) were included. Median operative time was 237 min (range 188-317 min). Hospital stay was 5.8 days (range 3-12 days). No conversions occurred; one case required the unplanned placement of additional 5-mm assistant trocar. Four patients (28.5%) developed postoperative complications. The mean Comprehensive Complication Index was 7.6 ± 12.8 (SD). Three patients (21.4%) required readmission within 30 days postoperatively. All patients underwent ileostomy closure at a median of 64 days after IPAA creation.

Conclusions: SP robotic proctectomy with IPAA is feasible and safe in unselected patients with UC, supporting further large prospective evaluation.

背景:对于希望避免永久性回肠造口的溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者,恢复性直结肠切除术联合回肠袋-肛门吻合术(IPAA)是标准的手术选择。单孔(SP)机器人手术提供了更高的灵活性和可视化,潜在地克服了单孔腹腔镜在受限盆腔中的局限性。它在UC的IPAA中的作用尚未被探索。方法:回顾性分析2024年10月至2025年6月在某三级中心行SP机器人结肠切除术联合IPAA治疗的溃疡性结肠炎患者。手术采用标准化的三步入路经肛门横断单钉吻合术(TTSS)。可行性定义为在完成手术时没有计划外转换为多口腹腔镜、剖腹手术或经肛门微创手术(TAMIS)。通过术后30天的发病率、再入院率和眼袋漏出率来分析安全性。结果:共纳入14例患者,中位年龄34岁,体重指数(BMI) 26.2 kg/m2。中位手术时间237分钟(范围188-317分钟)。住院时间为5.8天(范围3-12天)。没有发生转换;一个病例需要意外放置额外的5毫米辅助套管针。术后出现并发症4例(28.5%)。平均综合并发症指数为7.6±12.8 (SD)。3例(21.4%)患者术后30天内再次入院。所有患者均在IPAA形成后64天内进行回肠造口术。结论:在未选择的UC患者中,采用IPAA的SP机器人直肠切除术是可行且安全的,支持进一步的大规模前瞻性评估。
{"title":"Single-port robotic restorative proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: first clinical experience and technical insights.","authors":"Gabriele Bislenghi, Albert Wolthuis, André D'Hoore","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03246-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03246-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the standard surgical option for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) wishing to avoid a permanent ileostomy. Single-port (SP) robotic surgery offers enhanced dexterity and visualization, potentially overcoming the limitations of single-port laparoscopy in the confined pelvic cavity. Its role in IPAA for UC is unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing SP robotic proctectomy with IPAA at a tertiary center between October 2024 and June 2025 were reviewed. Procedures followed a standardized three-step approach with transanal transection single stapled (TTSS) anastomosis. Feasibility was defined as completion of the procedure without unplanned conversion to multiport laparoscopy, laparotomy, or transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS). Safety by 30-day postoperative morbidity, readmission, and pouch leak rates was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 patients (median age 34 years; body mass index (BMI) 26.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were included. Median operative time was 237 min (range 188-317 min). Hospital stay was 5.8 days (range 3-12 days). No conversions occurred; one case required the unplanned placement of additional 5-mm assistant trocar. Four patients (28.5%) developed postoperative complications. The mean Comprehensive Complication Index was 7.6 ± 12.8 (SD). Three patients (21.4%) required readmission within 30 days postoperatively. All patients underwent ileostomy closure at a median of 64 days after IPAA creation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SP robotic proctectomy with IPAA is feasible and safe in unselected patients with UC, supporting further large prospective evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12774989/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145829157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Associations between adjuvant antibiotic therapy and fistula formation after incision and drainage of anorectal abscesses: results from a retrospective cohort study. 辅助抗生素治疗与肛肠脓肿切开引流后瘘管形成的关系:一项回顾性队列研究的结果。
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03264-7
J Alabbad, S Almutairi, N Alsabagha, H Alhamly, F Alnaqi

Background: The efficacy of adjuvant antibiotic therapy in reducing the rate of fistula following incision and drainage (I and D) of cryptoglandular anorectal abscesses remains controversial. This study evaluated the effect of adjuvant antibiotic therapy on fistula formation rate.

Methods: This retrospective study included all consecutive adult patients who underwent I and D for a cryptoglandular anorectal abscess between January 2011 and December 2024 at a university-affiliated institution. Demographic, clinical, and microbiological culture data were collected. The intervention assessed was adjuvant antibiotic therapy administration for a minimum of 7 days following I and D. The primary outcome compared fistula formation rates at 12 months after I and D between those who received adjuvant antibiotic therapy and those who did not. Secondary outcomes assessed the factors associated with fistula formation.

Results: Of the 770 patients who met inclusion criteria, 60.5% received adjuvant antibiotic therapy. The overall rate of fistula was 6.8%. The overall median time to diagnosis was 15.4 weeks (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.7-31.3). No differences in the fistula formation rate or time to diagnosis were observed between the two groups. Fistula formation was significantly associated with abscess location, whereas diabetes mellitus was less common among patients who developed fistula. In addition, no patient whose abscess culture yielded skin-derived microorganisms developed a fistula. Age > 40 years and intersphincteric abscess were associated with fistula formation in multivariate analysis, while diabetes mellitus demonstrated a negative association.

Conclusions: In this retrospective study, adjuvant antibiotic therapy was not associated with a decreased risk of fistula formation following abscess I and D.

背景:对于隐腺肛肠脓肿切开引流(I和D)后,辅助抗生素治疗对降低瘘发生率的效果仍有争议。本研究评估抗生素辅助治疗对瘘管形成率的影响。方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了2011年1月至2024年12月期间在某大学附属机构接受隐腺肛肠脓肿I和D治疗的所有连续成年患者。收集了人口统计学、临床和微生物培养数据。评估的干预措施是在I和D后至少7天给予辅助抗生素治疗。主要结果比较I和D后12个月接受辅助抗生素治疗和未接受辅助抗生素治疗的患者的瘘管形成率。次要结果评估与瘘管形成相关的因素。结果:770例符合纳入标准的患者中,60.5%接受了辅助抗生素治疗。总瘘管率为6.8%。总体中位诊断时间为15.4周(四分位数间距[IQR]: 7.7-31.3)。两组患者的瘘管形成率和诊断时间均无差异。瘘管形成与脓肿位置显著相关,而糖尿病在发生瘘管的患者中较少见。此外,脓肿培养产生皮肤来源微生物的患者没有发生瘘管。多因素分析显示,年龄bb0 ~ 40岁和括约肌间脓肿与瘘形成相关,而糖尿病与瘘形成呈负相关。结论:在这项回顾性研究中,辅助抗生素治疗与I型和D型脓肿后瘘形成风险的降低无关。
{"title":"Associations between adjuvant antibiotic therapy and fistula formation after incision and drainage of anorectal abscesses: results from a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"J Alabbad, S Almutairi, N Alsabagha, H Alhamly, F Alnaqi","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03264-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03264-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of adjuvant antibiotic therapy in reducing the rate of fistula following incision and drainage (I and D) of cryptoglandular anorectal abscesses remains controversial. This study evaluated the effect of adjuvant antibiotic therapy on fistula formation rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included all consecutive adult patients who underwent I and D for a cryptoglandular anorectal abscess between January 2011 and December 2024 at a university-affiliated institution. Demographic, clinical, and microbiological culture data were collected. The intervention assessed was adjuvant antibiotic therapy administration for a minimum of 7 days following I and D. The primary outcome compared fistula formation rates at 12 months after I and D between those who received adjuvant antibiotic therapy and those who did not. Secondary outcomes assessed the factors associated with fistula formation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 770 patients who met inclusion criteria, 60.5% received adjuvant antibiotic therapy. The overall rate of fistula was 6.8%. The overall median time to diagnosis was 15.4 weeks (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.7-31.3). No differences in the fistula formation rate or time to diagnosis were observed between the two groups. Fistula formation was significantly associated with abscess location, whereas diabetes mellitus was less common among patients who developed fistula. In addition, no patient whose abscess culture yielded skin-derived microorganisms developed a fistula. Age > 40 years and intersphincteric abscess were associated with fistula formation in multivariate analysis, while diabetes mellitus demonstrated a negative association.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective study, adjuvant antibiotic therapy was not associated with a decreased risk of fistula formation following abscess I and D.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12819476/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145822118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing the efficacy of mannitol and polyethylene glycol in treating patients with poor bowel preparation: a randomized controlled clinical study. 比较甘露醇和聚乙二醇治疗肠准备不良患者的疗效:一项随机对照临床研究。
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03243-y
S Zheng, Z Xu, F Deng, S Wang, T Qian, P Lin, C Wang, W Wang, Y Xia, L Xu, Z Zhang

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a global health concern, underscoring the importance of effective bowel preparation for diagnostic procedures such as colonoscopy. This randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of orally administered mannitol and polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions for repeat colonoscopy in patients with inadequate bowel preparation.

Methods: This prospective, open-label, noninferiority, blinded end point, randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled patients from two centers. Participants aged 18-75 years with Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores ≤ 1 in any colon segment were included. The study employed a 1-L mannitol or PEG solution, with primary outcomes assessed using BBPS scores. The secondary outcomes included adverse events, taste preferences, and patient satisfaction. A simple randomization strategy was employed, and both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were conducted.

Results: A total of 134 patients were included in the study, and the trial demonstrated the noninferiority of mannitol compared to PEG in achieving adequate bowel preparation (difference 3.0%, 95% confidence interval - 5.0 to 11.0%). Mannitol exhibited favorable trends in BBPS scores, highlighting its effectiveness. The safety profiles of the two solutions were comparable, with a low incidence of adverse events (17.9% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.825). Notably, mannitol outperformed PEG in terms of patient satisfaction and a greater inclination for reuse.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that orally administered mannitol is not inferior to orally administered PEG in patients with inadequate bowel preparation.

Registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05912114. Registered on 12/6/2023.

背景:结直肠癌(CRC)仍然是一个全球性的健康问题,强调了有效的肠道准备对结肠镜检查等诊断程序的重要性。这项随机对照试验旨在比较口服甘露醇和聚乙二醇(PEG)溶液对肠道准备不充分的患者进行重复结肠镜检查的疗效和耐受性。方法:这项前瞻性、开放标签、非劣效性、盲法终点、随机对照临床试验纳入了来自两个中心的患者。年龄在18-75岁之间,任一结肠段波士顿肠准备量表(BBPS)评分≤1分的参与者被纳入研究。该研究采用1升甘露醇或PEG溶液,主要结果使用BBPS评分评估。次要结局包括不良事件、口味偏好和患者满意度。采用简单的随机化策略,并进行意向治疗(ITT)和每个方案(PP)分析。结果:研究共纳入134例患者,试验证明甘露醇与PEG相比在实现充分的肠道准备方面具有非劣效性(差异3.0%,95%置信区间- 5.0至11.0%)。甘露醇在BBPS评分中表现出良好的趋势,突出了其有效性。两种方案的安全性具有可比性,不良事件发生率较低(17.9% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.825)。值得注意的是,甘露醇在患者满意度和更大的重复使用倾向方面优于PEG。结论:研究结果表明,口服甘露醇对肠准备不充分患者的治疗效果并不逊于口服聚乙二醇。注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05912114。于2023年6月12日注册
{"title":"Comparing the efficacy of mannitol and polyethylene glycol in treating patients with poor bowel preparation: a randomized controlled clinical study.","authors":"S Zheng, Z Xu, F Deng, S Wang, T Qian, P Lin, C Wang, W Wang, Y Xia, L Xu, Z Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03243-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03243-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a global health concern, underscoring the importance of effective bowel preparation for diagnostic procedures such as colonoscopy. This randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of orally administered mannitol and polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions for repeat colonoscopy in patients with inadequate bowel preparation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, open-label, noninferiority, blinded end point, randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled patients from two centers. Participants aged 18-75 years with Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores ≤ 1 in any colon segment were included. The study employed a 1-L mannitol or PEG solution, with primary outcomes assessed using BBPS scores. The secondary outcomes included adverse events, taste preferences, and patient satisfaction. A simple randomization strategy was employed, and both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 134 patients were included in the study, and the trial demonstrated the noninferiority of mannitol compared to PEG in achieving adequate bowel preparation (difference 3.0%, 95% confidence interval - 5.0 to 11.0%). Mannitol exhibited favorable trends in BBPS scores, highlighting its effectiveness. The safety profiles of the two solutions were comparable, with a low incidence of adverse events (17.9% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.825). Notably, mannitol outperformed PEG in terms of patient satisfaction and a greater inclination for reuse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that orally administered mannitol is not inferior to orally administered PEG in patients with inadequate bowel preparation.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05912114. Registered on 12/6/2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12775070/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145829029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Novel and simple technique to prevent internal hernias after laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resection: alignment and fixation of the proximal jejunum. 防止腹腔镜左侧结直肠切除术后发生内疝的一种新颖而简单的技术:对准并固定近端空肠。
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-23 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03253-w
Z Zheng, Z Chen, X Wang, D Ye, X Lu, Y Huang, P Chi

Background: Internal hernia with small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal resection is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication, especially when it occurs after left hemicolectomy. While several studies have suggested that the closure of mesenteric defects may prevent internal hernias, the optimal preventive strategy has yet to be determined.

Methods: We describe a surgical technique designed to reduce the risk of internal hernia after left-sided colorectal resection, involving complete mobilization of the proximal jejunum, followed by its alignment and fixation to the epiploic appendages over the reconstructed left mesocolon.

Results: From November 2024 to February 2025, the aforementioned surgical procedures were successfully performed in 25 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection with splenic flexure mobilization. No symptomatic or asymptomatic internal hernias were observed during the follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan (3-6 months).

Conclusions: This novel technique has the potential to reduce internal hernias. Further studies are required.

背景:腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术后的内疝合并小肠梗阻是一种罕见但可能危及生命的并发症,尤其是发生在左半结肠切除术后。虽然有几项研究表明,关闭肠系膜缺陷可以预防内部疝,但最佳的预防策略尚未确定。方法:我们描述了一种手术技术,旨在降低左侧结肠直肠切除术后发生内疝的风险,包括完全动员空肠近端,随后将其对准并固定在重建的左侧结肠系膜上的网膜附件。结果:从2024年11月至2025年2月,25例经腹腔镜结肠直肠切除脾屈曲活动患者成功完成上述手术。随访3-6个月,均未见有症状或无症状的腹内疝。结论:这种新技术具有减少内疝的潜力。需要进一步的研究。
{"title":"Novel and simple technique to prevent internal hernias after laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resection: alignment and fixation of the proximal jejunum.","authors":"Z Zheng, Z Chen, X Wang, D Ye, X Lu, Y Huang, P Chi","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03253-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03253-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Internal hernia with small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal resection is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication, especially when it occurs after left hemicolectomy. While several studies have suggested that the closure of mesenteric defects may prevent internal hernias, the optimal preventive strategy has yet to be determined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe a surgical technique designed to reduce the risk of internal hernia after left-sided colorectal resection, involving complete mobilization of the proximal jejunum, followed by its alignment and fixation to the epiploic appendages over the reconstructed left mesocolon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From November 2024 to February 2025, the aforementioned surgical procedures were successfully performed in 25 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection with splenic flexure mobilization. No symptomatic or asymptomatic internal hernias were observed during the follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan (3-6 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel technique has the potential to reduce internal hernias. Further studies are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12743020/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145822163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy with CME, CVL and division of right gastroepiploic vessels. 腹腔镜下右半结肠根治术伴CME、CVL及右胃大网膜血管分离。
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-23 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03270-9
Zi Qin Ng, Jih Huei Tan

This case report describes the laparoscopic technique of infrapyloric lymph node dissection as part of a complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right-sided colon cancer. While controversial and not routinely performed, this extended dissection is indicated in the presence of specific risk factors for nodal metastasis, such as elevated CEA (> 17 ng/ml) and obstructive symptoms, as presented in our 88-year-old patient. The article outlines the key surgical steps to safely clear the infrapyloric region, emphasizing ligation of the right gastroepiploic vessels and meticulous dissection to minimize bleeding and chyle leakage.

本病例报告描述了腹腔镜技术的幽门下淋巴结清扫作为一个完整的肠系膜切除术(CME)的一部分右侧结肠癌。虽然存在争议,也没有常规进行,但这种扩大的解剖表明存在淋巴结转移的特定危险因素,如CEA升高(bbb17ng /ml)和梗阻症状,正如我们88岁患者所表现的那样。本文概述了安全清除幽门下区域的关键手术步骤,强调结扎右胃大网膜血管和细致的解剖以减少出血和乳糜漏。
{"title":"Laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy with CME, CVL and division of right gastroepiploic vessels.","authors":"Zi Qin Ng, Jih Huei Tan","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03270-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03270-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This case report describes the laparoscopic technique of infrapyloric lymph node dissection as part of a complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right-sided colon cancer. While controversial and not routinely performed, this extended dissection is indicated in the presence of specific risk factors for nodal metastasis, such as elevated CEA (> 17 ng/ml) and obstructive symptoms, as presented in our 88-year-old patient. The article outlines the key surgical steps to safely clear the infrapyloric region, emphasizing ligation of the right gastroepiploic vessels and meticulous dissection to minimize bleeding and chyle leakage.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12819431/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145811949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mesh in rectopexy: biological, synthetic, or hybrid? 直肠固定术中的网状物:生物的、合成的还是混合的?
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-23 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03266-5
Marije A Boom, Esther C J Consten
{"title":"Mesh in rectopexy: biological, synthetic, or hybrid?","authors":"Marije A Boom, Esther C J Consten","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03266-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03266-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12727842/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145811942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Semiflex-assisted vacuum therapy for perianal fistulas: the Semiflex pilot study. 半旋辅助真空治疗肛周瘘管:半旋前期研究。
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03240-1
A J M Pronk, J Y van Oostendorp, I J M Han-Geurts, S Madelska, C J Buskens, W A Bemelman

Introduction: Perianal fistulas often require multiple surgical interventions because of their chronic nature. Various sphincter-sparing techniques achieve clinical closure rates of up to 70%, yet recurrence remains a major challenge. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy has shown promise in wound healing, but its application in perianal fistulas remains largely unexplored. The Semiflex catheter was developed to facilitate outpatient vacuum therapy without the need for general anesthesia during catheter exchanges. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical applicability of the Semiflex catheter in perianal fistula management.

Methods: The Semiflex pilot study was a two-part feasibility trial. The first part assessed proof of principle in ten patients, while the second part, a multicentre study, aimed to confirm feasibility in 20 patients. Feasibility included smoothness of insertion and changing of the Semiflex catheters, capability of proper fixation of the Semiflex catheter, maintaining vacuum for more than 48 h, and compliance to the therapy in terms of pain and discomfort. The protocol was scored feasible if at least 50% of the exchanges met all these criteria in at least 70% of patients. Secondary outcomes included clinical fistula closure, radiological healing, and treatment-related adverse events.

Results: Twenty patients were included (median age 39.5 years; 70% Crohn's disease). Thirteen Semiflex treatments were scored as feasible, below the predefined threshold. Clinical fistula closure was observed in 50% of patients, but none showed radiological healing at 3 months. One serious adverse event occurred, requiring early treatment discontinuation, while minor complications, including local skin reactions and pressure sores, were managed conservatively.

Conclusions: Semiflex therapy was feasible in a subset of patients and allowed outpatient treatment. However, maintaining vacuum and achieving long-term fistula closure remains challenging. While Semiflex may have a role in perianal fistula management, further research is needed to refine patient selection and optimize its application.

简介:由于肛周瘘的慢性性质,通常需要多次手术干预。各种保留括约肌的技术使临床闭合率高达70%,但复发仍然是主要的挑战。真空辅助闭合(VAC)治疗在伤口愈合中显示出希望,但其在肛周瘘中的应用仍未得到很大的探索。Semiflex导管的开发是为了方便门诊病人的真空治疗,而不需要在导管交换期间进行全身麻醉。本初步研究旨在评估Semiflex导管在肛瘘治疗中的可行性和临床适用性。方法:Semiflex的前期研究为两部分可行性试验。第一部分评估了10名患者的原理证明,而第二部分是一项多中心研究,旨在确认20名患者的可行性。可行性包括:插入和更换Semiflex导管的平稳性,适当固定Semiflex导管的能力,保持真空48小时以上,疼痛和不适方面对治疗的依从性。如果至少50%的交换在至少70%的患者中符合所有这些标准,则该方案被评为可行。次要结局包括临床瘘管闭合、放射学愈合和治疗相关不良事件。结果:纳入20例患者(中位年龄39.5岁,70%为克罗恩病)。13个Semiflex治疗被评为可行,低于预定义的阈值。在50%的患者中观察到临床瘘管闭合,但在3个月时没有放射学愈合。发生了一个严重的不良事件,需要早期停止治疗,而轻微的并发症,包括局部皮肤反应和压疮,被保守地处理。结论:半屈曲治疗在一部分患者中是可行的,并且允许门诊治疗。然而,维持真空和实现长期瘘管闭合仍然具有挑战性。虽然Semiflex可能在肛周瘘治疗中发挥作用,但需要进一步研究来完善患者选择并优化其应用。
{"title":"Semiflex-assisted vacuum therapy for perianal fistulas: the Semiflex pilot study.","authors":"A J M Pronk, J Y van Oostendorp, I J M Han-Geurts, S Madelska, C J Buskens, W A Bemelman","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03240-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03240-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Perianal fistulas often require multiple surgical interventions because of their chronic nature. Various sphincter-sparing techniques achieve clinical closure rates of up to 70%, yet recurrence remains a major challenge. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy has shown promise in wound healing, but its application in perianal fistulas remains largely unexplored. The Semiflex catheter was developed to facilitate outpatient vacuum therapy without the need for general anesthesia during catheter exchanges. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical applicability of the Semiflex catheter in perianal fistula management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Semiflex pilot study was a two-part feasibility trial. The first part assessed proof of principle in ten patients, while the second part, a multicentre study, aimed to confirm feasibility in 20 patients. Feasibility included smoothness of insertion and changing of the Semiflex catheters, capability of proper fixation of the Semiflex catheter, maintaining vacuum for more than 48 h, and compliance to the therapy in terms of pain and discomfort. The protocol was scored feasible if at least 50% of the exchanges met all these criteria in at least 70% of patients. Secondary outcomes included clinical fistula closure, radiological healing, and treatment-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients were included (median age 39.5 years; 70% Crohn's disease). Thirteen Semiflex treatments were scored as feasible, below the predefined threshold. Clinical fistula closure was observed in 50% of patients, but none showed radiological healing at 3 months. One serious adverse event occurred, requiring early treatment discontinuation, while minor complications, including local skin reactions and pressure sores, were managed conservatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Semiflex therapy was feasible in a subset of patients and allowed outpatient treatment. However, maintaining vacuum and achieving long-term fistula closure remains challenging. While Semiflex may have a role in perianal fistula management, further research is needed to refine patient selection and optimize its application.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12685983/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anatomical and functional outcomes of combined ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 腹侧直肠固定术联合骶结肠/子宫固定术治疗多室盆腔器官脱垂的解剖和功能结果:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03236-x
Alessandro Ferdinando Ruffolo, Tomaso Melocchi, Chrystèle Rubod, Yohan Kerbage, Giuseppe Campagna, Sara Mastrovito, Alfredo Ercoli, Giovanni Panico, Michel Cosson, Marine Lallemant

Introduction: Limited data exists in literature regarding concomitant ventral rectopexy (VRP) and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy (SCP/SHP), with existing studies being predominantly retrospective. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the anatomical and functional outcomes of combined VRP and SCP/SHP for the treatment of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Methods: We performed systematic research and meta-analysis from PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, until 15 January 2025. Women submitted to VRP with SCP/SHP were included. Improvement of anorectal symptoms were evaluated. Postoperative anatomical relapse was reported. Re-operation rates were evaluated.

Results: Six articles were included. Constipation/obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) [odds ratio (OR) 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.68; p = 0.006 (I2 test 81%, p = 0.56)] and of anal/fecal incontinence (AI/FI) rates [OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03-0.30; p < 0.0001 (I2 test 70%, p = 0.04)] significantly improved after combined VRP and SCP/SHP. The proportion metanalysis of four included studies reported a subjective POP recurrence rate of 7% (95% CI 1-13%; I2 test 82.9%, p < 0.001). The proportion metanalysis of five included studies for objective POP recurrence was 5% (95% CI 1-9%; I2 test 56.9%, p = 0.041). No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: VRP combined with SCP/SHP has been shown to be safe and effective for women with multicompartment POP, providing optimal anatomical and functional outcomes. Larger, long-term, prospective-controlled studies are needed to confirm these results.

文献中关于腹侧直肠固定术(VRP)和骶结肠/子宫固定术(SCP/SHP)的数据有限,现有的研究主要是回顾性的。本荟萃分析的目的是评估VRP和SCP/SHP联合治疗多房室盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的解剖和功能结果。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA) 2020指南的首选报告项目,我们从PubMed/MEDLINE和EMBASE进行了系统研究和荟萃分析,直到2025年1月15日。患有SCP/SHP的妇女被纳入VRP。评估肛门直肠症状的改善情况。术后解剖复发均有报道。评估再手术率。结果:纳入6篇文章。便秘/排便障碍综合征(ODS)[优势比(OR) 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.68;p = 0.006 (I2试验81%,p = 0.56)]和肛门/大便失禁(AI/FI)发生率[OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03-0.30;p 2检验70%,p = 0.04)], VRP与SCP/SHP联合治疗后显著改善。四项纳入研究的比例元分析报告主观POP复发率为7% (95% CI 1-13%; I2检验82.9%,p 2检验56.9%,p = 0.041)。无严重不良事件报告。结论:VRP联合SCP/SHP已被证明是安全有效的治疗女性多室POP,提供最佳的解剖和功能结果。需要更大规模的、长期的、前瞻性对照研究来证实这些结果。
{"title":"Anatomical and functional outcomes of combined ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Alessandro Ferdinando Ruffolo, Tomaso Melocchi, Chrystèle Rubod, Yohan Kerbage, Giuseppe Campagna, Sara Mastrovito, Alfredo Ercoli, Giovanni Panico, Michel Cosson, Marine Lallemant","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03236-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03236-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Limited data exists in literature regarding concomitant ventral rectopexy (VRP) and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy (SCP/SHP), with existing studies being predominantly retrospective. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the anatomical and functional outcomes of combined VRP and SCP/SHP for the treatment of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse (POP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed systematic research and meta-analysis from PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, until 15 January 2025. Women submitted to VRP with SCP/SHP were included. Improvement of anorectal symptoms were evaluated. Postoperative anatomical relapse was reported. Re-operation rates were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six articles were included. Constipation/obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) [odds ratio (OR) 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.68; p = 0.006 (I<sup>2</sup> test 81%, p = 0.56)] and of anal/fecal incontinence (AI/FI) rates [OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03-0.30; p < 0.0001 (I<sup>2</sup> test 70%, p = 0.04)] significantly improved after combined VRP and SCP/SHP. The proportion metanalysis of four included studies reported a subjective POP recurrence rate of 7% (95% CI 1-13%; I<sup>2</sup> test 82.9%, p < 0.001). The proportion metanalysis of five included studies for objective POP recurrence was 5% (95% CI 1-9%; I<sup>2</sup> test 56.9%, p = 0.041). No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VRP combined with SCP/SHP has been shown to be safe and effective for women with multicompartment POP, providing optimal anatomical and functional outcomes. Larger, long-term, prospective-controlled studies are needed to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12685978/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Techniques in Coloproctology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1