Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03271-8
M Cricrì, A Miele, F P Tropeano, A Zoretti, G D De Palma, G Luglio
Background: Complex perianal fistulas present a significant surgical challenge due to high recurrence rates and the need to preserve sphincter function. Fistula-tract Laser Closure (FiLaC™) is a minimally invasive technique that offers promising results, but incomplete closure of the internal opening remains a major cause of recurrence. To improve outcomes, we propose the FiLaFlap technique, which combines FiLaC™ with a mucosal advancement flap to enhance fistula healing.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent seton removal with the FiLaFlap procedure between January 2023 and September 2024. Postoperative data, including pain levels, complications, continence status, and follow-up outcomes, were collected prospectively. Patients underwent clinical evaluations and 3D endoanal ultrasound assessments at predefined intervals.
Results: A total of 24 patients (58.3% male, mean age 39.4 ± 12.4 years) were included. The mean time between seton placement and FiLaFlap was 5.95 ± 1.78 months. Postoperative pain was low (VAS 2.20 ± 0.97), and no major complications occurred. At 6 months, 91.6% of patients achieved clinical remission, while 83.3% had ultrasound-confirmed healing. Only one patient reported minor incontinence.
Conclusion: The FiLaFlap technique appears to be a safe and potentially effective sphincter-preserving strategy for complex perianal fistulas, demonstrating high remission rates with minimal morbidity. Further studies with larger cohorts and extended follow-up are needed to validate these preliminary findings.
{"title":"A novel sphincter-sparing procedure for seton removal in complex perianal fistulas: the FiLaFlap technique.","authors":"M Cricrì, A Miele, F P Tropeano, A Zoretti, G D De Palma, G Luglio","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03271-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03271-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complex perianal fistulas present a significant surgical challenge due to high recurrence rates and the need to preserve sphincter function. Fistula-tract Laser Closure (FiLaC™) is a minimally invasive technique that offers promising results, but incomplete closure of the internal opening remains a major cause of recurrence. To improve outcomes, we propose the FiLaFlap technique, which combines FiLaC™ with a mucosal advancement flap to enhance fistula healing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent seton removal with the FiLaFlap procedure between January 2023 and September 2024. Postoperative data, including pain levels, complications, continence status, and follow-up outcomes, were collected prospectively. Patients underwent clinical evaluations and 3D endoanal ultrasound assessments at predefined intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 patients (58.3% male, mean age 39.4 ± 12.4 years) were included. The mean time between seton placement and FiLaFlap was 5.95 ± 1.78 months. Postoperative pain was low (VAS 2.20 ± 0.97), and no major complications occurred. At 6 months, 91.6% of patients achieved clinical remission, while 83.3% had ultrasound-confirmed healing. Only one patient reported minor incontinence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FiLaFlap technique appears to be a safe and potentially effective sphincter-preserving strategy for complex perianal fistulas, demonstrating high remission rates with minimal morbidity. Further studies with larger cohorts and extended follow-up are needed to validate these preliminary findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12823693/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145822122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03254-9
J Duelund-Jakobsen, S Buntzen, L Lundby, S Laurberg, M Sørensen, M Rydningen
Introduction: In sacral neuromodulation (SNM), the stimulation intensity is set at the sensory threshold (ST) level. However, subsensory stimulation as low as 50% of ST has proven effective in reducing faecal incontinence episodes.
Aim: To explore the relationship between functional outcomes and varying subsensory stimulation amplitude in newly implanted patients.
Method: This randomised, double-blind study was designed to include patients with ≥ 1 faecal incontinence episodes/week despite maximal conservative therapy. As part of another trial, patients were offered a one-stage procedure. Postoperatively, patients were randomised into two groups. G-1 received stimulation at 0.05 V, at 50% and 90% of the ST in three 4-week periods, followed by 12 weeks of stimulation at the ST. G-2 received stimulation at 90% of the ST in three 4-week periods, followed by 12 weeks of stimulation at ST. Patients were evaluated after each period using St. Marks's Incontinence Score and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for patient satisfaction regarding social function, bowel function and quality-of-life, along with a bowel habit diary.
Results: In total, 73 patients with a median age of 60 years [interquartile range (IQR: 50-69 years)] completed the trial. Faecal incontinence episodes were significantly reduced at all follow-ups, with no differences between groups. The only statistical difference between groups was deltaVAS for bowel function after 4 weeks. In G-1 with ultra-low stimulation amplitude [0.05 V - equivalent to 9.6% (IQR: 6.5-13.4) of ST], the improvement compared with baseline was 30 points (IQR: 10-50) significantly lower than G-2 with an improvement of 50 points (IQR: 10-70) (p-value: 0.05).
Conclusions: Subsensory stimulation is feasible in newly implanted patients with faecal incontinence. An amplitude of 0.05 V is as effective on the functional outcomes as stimulation with higher amplitudes.
{"title":"Sacral neuromodulation with ultra-low stimulation intensity is effective in faecal incontinence - results from a randomised study with a one-stage implant procedure.","authors":"J Duelund-Jakobsen, S Buntzen, L Lundby, S Laurberg, M Sørensen, M Rydningen","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03254-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03254-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In sacral neuromodulation (SNM), the stimulation intensity is set at the sensory threshold (ST) level. However, subsensory stimulation as low as 50% of ST has proven effective in reducing faecal incontinence episodes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the relationship between functional outcomes and varying subsensory stimulation amplitude in newly implanted patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This randomised, double-blind study was designed to include patients with ≥ 1 faecal incontinence episodes/week despite maximal conservative therapy. As part of another trial, patients were offered a one-stage procedure. Postoperatively, patients were randomised into two groups. G-1 received stimulation at 0.05 V, at 50% and 90% of the ST in three 4-week periods, followed by 12 weeks of stimulation at the ST. G-2 received stimulation at 90% of the ST in three 4-week periods, followed by 12 weeks of stimulation at ST. Patients were evaluated after each period using St. Marks's Incontinence Score and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for patient satisfaction regarding social function, bowel function and quality-of-life, along with a bowel habit diary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 73 patients with a median age of 60 years [interquartile range (IQR: 50-69 years)] completed the trial. Faecal incontinence episodes were significantly reduced at all follow-ups, with no differences between groups. The only statistical difference between groups was deltaVAS for bowel function after 4 weeks. In G-1 with ultra-low stimulation amplitude [0.05 V - equivalent to 9.6% (IQR: 6.5-13.4) of ST], the improvement compared with baseline was 30 points (IQR: 10-50) significantly lower than G-2 with an improvement of 50 points (IQR: 10-70) (p-value: 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subsensory stimulation is feasible in newly implanted patients with faecal incontinence. An amplitude of 0.05 V is as effective on the functional outcomes as stimulation with higher amplitudes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12799699/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145829141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03246-9
Gabriele Bislenghi, Albert Wolthuis, André D'Hoore
Background: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the standard surgical option for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) wishing to avoid a permanent ileostomy. Single-port (SP) robotic surgery offers enhanced dexterity and visualization, potentially overcoming the limitations of single-port laparoscopy in the confined pelvic cavity. Its role in IPAA for UC is unexplored.
Methods: Patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing SP robotic proctectomy with IPAA at a tertiary center between October 2024 and June 2025 were reviewed. Procedures followed a standardized three-step approach with transanal transection single stapled (TTSS) anastomosis. Feasibility was defined as completion of the procedure without unplanned conversion to multiport laparoscopy, laparotomy, or transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS). Safety by 30-day postoperative morbidity, readmission, and pouch leak rates was analyzed.
Results: A total of 14 patients (median age 34 years; body mass index (BMI) 26.2 kg/m2) were included. Median operative time was 237 min (range 188-317 min). Hospital stay was 5.8 days (range 3-12 days). No conversions occurred; one case required the unplanned placement of additional 5-mm assistant trocar. Four patients (28.5%) developed postoperative complications. The mean Comprehensive Complication Index was 7.6 ± 12.8 (SD). Three patients (21.4%) required readmission within 30 days postoperatively. All patients underwent ileostomy closure at a median of 64 days after IPAA creation.
Conclusions: SP robotic proctectomy with IPAA is feasible and safe in unselected patients with UC, supporting further large prospective evaluation.
{"title":"Single-port robotic restorative proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: first clinical experience and technical insights.","authors":"Gabriele Bislenghi, Albert Wolthuis, André D'Hoore","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03246-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03246-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the standard surgical option for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) wishing to avoid a permanent ileostomy. Single-port (SP) robotic surgery offers enhanced dexterity and visualization, potentially overcoming the limitations of single-port laparoscopy in the confined pelvic cavity. Its role in IPAA for UC is unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing SP robotic proctectomy with IPAA at a tertiary center between October 2024 and June 2025 were reviewed. Procedures followed a standardized three-step approach with transanal transection single stapled (TTSS) anastomosis. Feasibility was defined as completion of the procedure without unplanned conversion to multiport laparoscopy, laparotomy, or transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS). Safety by 30-day postoperative morbidity, readmission, and pouch leak rates was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 patients (median age 34 years; body mass index (BMI) 26.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were included. Median operative time was 237 min (range 188-317 min). Hospital stay was 5.8 days (range 3-12 days). No conversions occurred; one case required the unplanned placement of additional 5-mm assistant trocar. Four patients (28.5%) developed postoperative complications. The mean Comprehensive Complication Index was 7.6 ± 12.8 (SD). Three patients (21.4%) required readmission within 30 days postoperatively. All patients underwent ileostomy closure at a median of 64 days after IPAA creation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SP robotic proctectomy with IPAA is feasible and safe in unselected patients with UC, supporting further large prospective evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12774989/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145829157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03264-7
J Alabbad, S Almutairi, N Alsabagha, H Alhamly, F Alnaqi
Background: The efficacy of adjuvant antibiotic therapy in reducing the rate of fistula following incision and drainage (I and D) of cryptoglandular anorectal abscesses remains controversial. This study evaluated the effect of adjuvant antibiotic therapy on fistula formation rate.
Methods: This retrospective study included all consecutive adult patients who underwent I and D for a cryptoglandular anorectal abscess between January 2011 and December 2024 at a university-affiliated institution. Demographic, clinical, and microbiological culture data were collected. The intervention assessed was adjuvant antibiotic therapy administration for a minimum of 7 days following I and D. The primary outcome compared fistula formation rates at 12 months after I and D between those who received adjuvant antibiotic therapy and those who did not. Secondary outcomes assessed the factors associated with fistula formation.
Results: Of the 770 patients who met inclusion criteria, 60.5% received adjuvant antibiotic therapy. The overall rate of fistula was 6.8%. The overall median time to diagnosis was 15.4 weeks (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.7-31.3). No differences in the fistula formation rate or time to diagnosis were observed between the two groups. Fistula formation was significantly associated with abscess location, whereas diabetes mellitus was less common among patients who developed fistula. In addition, no patient whose abscess culture yielded skin-derived microorganisms developed a fistula. Age > 40 years and intersphincteric abscess were associated with fistula formation in multivariate analysis, while diabetes mellitus demonstrated a negative association.
Conclusions: In this retrospective study, adjuvant antibiotic therapy was not associated with a decreased risk of fistula formation following abscess I and D.
{"title":"Associations between adjuvant antibiotic therapy and fistula formation after incision and drainage of anorectal abscesses: results from a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"J Alabbad, S Almutairi, N Alsabagha, H Alhamly, F Alnaqi","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03264-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03264-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of adjuvant antibiotic therapy in reducing the rate of fistula following incision and drainage (I and D) of cryptoglandular anorectal abscesses remains controversial. This study evaluated the effect of adjuvant antibiotic therapy on fistula formation rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included all consecutive adult patients who underwent I and D for a cryptoglandular anorectal abscess between January 2011 and December 2024 at a university-affiliated institution. Demographic, clinical, and microbiological culture data were collected. The intervention assessed was adjuvant antibiotic therapy administration for a minimum of 7 days following I and D. The primary outcome compared fistula formation rates at 12 months after I and D between those who received adjuvant antibiotic therapy and those who did not. Secondary outcomes assessed the factors associated with fistula formation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 770 patients who met inclusion criteria, 60.5% received adjuvant antibiotic therapy. The overall rate of fistula was 6.8%. The overall median time to diagnosis was 15.4 weeks (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.7-31.3). No differences in the fistula formation rate or time to diagnosis were observed between the two groups. Fistula formation was significantly associated with abscess location, whereas diabetes mellitus was less common among patients who developed fistula. In addition, no patient whose abscess culture yielded skin-derived microorganisms developed a fistula. Age > 40 years and intersphincteric abscess were associated with fistula formation in multivariate analysis, while diabetes mellitus demonstrated a negative association.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective study, adjuvant antibiotic therapy was not associated with a decreased risk of fistula formation following abscess I and D.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12819476/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145822118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03243-y
S Zheng, Z Xu, F Deng, S Wang, T Qian, P Lin, C Wang, W Wang, Y Xia, L Xu, Z Zhang
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a global health concern, underscoring the importance of effective bowel preparation for diagnostic procedures such as colonoscopy. This randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of orally administered mannitol and polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions for repeat colonoscopy in patients with inadequate bowel preparation.
Methods: This prospective, open-label, noninferiority, blinded end point, randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled patients from two centers. Participants aged 18-75 years with Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores ≤ 1 in any colon segment were included. The study employed a 1-L mannitol or PEG solution, with primary outcomes assessed using BBPS scores. The secondary outcomes included adverse events, taste preferences, and patient satisfaction. A simple randomization strategy was employed, and both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were conducted.
Results: A total of 134 patients were included in the study, and the trial demonstrated the noninferiority of mannitol compared to PEG in achieving adequate bowel preparation (difference 3.0%, 95% confidence interval - 5.0 to 11.0%). Mannitol exhibited favorable trends in BBPS scores, highlighting its effectiveness. The safety profiles of the two solutions were comparable, with a low incidence of adverse events (17.9% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.825). Notably, mannitol outperformed PEG in terms of patient satisfaction and a greater inclination for reuse.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that orally administered mannitol is not inferior to orally administered PEG in patients with inadequate bowel preparation.
Registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05912114. Registered on 12/6/2023.
背景:结直肠癌(CRC)仍然是一个全球性的健康问题,强调了有效的肠道准备对结肠镜检查等诊断程序的重要性。这项随机对照试验旨在比较口服甘露醇和聚乙二醇(PEG)溶液对肠道准备不充分的患者进行重复结肠镜检查的疗效和耐受性。方法:这项前瞻性、开放标签、非劣效性、盲法终点、随机对照临床试验纳入了来自两个中心的患者。年龄在18-75岁之间,任一结肠段波士顿肠准备量表(BBPS)评分≤1分的参与者被纳入研究。该研究采用1升甘露醇或PEG溶液,主要结果使用BBPS评分评估。次要结局包括不良事件、口味偏好和患者满意度。采用简单的随机化策略,并进行意向治疗(ITT)和每个方案(PP)分析。结果:研究共纳入134例患者,试验证明甘露醇与PEG相比在实现充分的肠道准备方面具有非劣效性(差异3.0%,95%置信区间- 5.0至11.0%)。甘露醇在BBPS评分中表现出良好的趋势,突出了其有效性。两种方案的安全性具有可比性,不良事件发生率较低(17.9% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.825)。值得注意的是,甘露醇在患者满意度和更大的重复使用倾向方面优于PEG。结论:研究结果表明,口服甘露醇对肠准备不充分患者的治疗效果并不逊于口服聚乙二醇。注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05912114。于2023年6月12日注册
{"title":"Comparing the efficacy of mannitol and polyethylene glycol in treating patients with poor bowel preparation: a randomized controlled clinical study.","authors":"S Zheng, Z Xu, F Deng, S Wang, T Qian, P Lin, C Wang, W Wang, Y Xia, L Xu, Z Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03243-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03243-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a global health concern, underscoring the importance of effective bowel preparation for diagnostic procedures such as colonoscopy. This randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of orally administered mannitol and polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions for repeat colonoscopy in patients with inadequate bowel preparation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, open-label, noninferiority, blinded end point, randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled patients from two centers. Participants aged 18-75 years with Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores ≤ 1 in any colon segment were included. The study employed a 1-L mannitol or PEG solution, with primary outcomes assessed using BBPS scores. The secondary outcomes included adverse events, taste preferences, and patient satisfaction. A simple randomization strategy was employed, and both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 134 patients were included in the study, and the trial demonstrated the noninferiority of mannitol compared to PEG in achieving adequate bowel preparation (difference 3.0%, 95% confidence interval - 5.0 to 11.0%). Mannitol exhibited favorable trends in BBPS scores, highlighting its effectiveness. The safety profiles of the two solutions were comparable, with a low incidence of adverse events (17.9% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.825). Notably, mannitol outperformed PEG in terms of patient satisfaction and a greater inclination for reuse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that orally administered mannitol is not inferior to orally administered PEG in patients with inadequate bowel preparation.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05912114. Registered on 12/6/2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12775070/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145829029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03253-w
Z Zheng, Z Chen, X Wang, D Ye, X Lu, Y Huang, P Chi
Background: Internal hernia with small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal resection is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication, especially when it occurs after left hemicolectomy. While several studies have suggested that the closure of mesenteric defects may prevent internal hernias, the optimal preventive strategy has yet to be determined.
Methods: We describe a surgical technique designed to reduce the risk of internal hernia after left-sided colorectal resection, involving complete mobilization of the proximal jejunum, followed by its alignment and fixation to the epiploic appendages over the reconstructed left mesocolon.
Results: From November 2024 to February 2025, the aforementioned surgical procedures were successfully performed in 25 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection with splenic flexure mobilization. No symptomatic or asymptomatic internal hernias were observed during the follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan (3-6 months).
Conclusions: This novel technique has the potential to reduce internal hernias. Further studies are required.
{"title":"Novel and simple technique to prevent internal hernias after laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resection: alignment and fixation of the proximal jejunum.","authors":"Z Zheng, Z Chen, X Wang, D Ye, X Lu, Y Huang, P Chi","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03253-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03253-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Internal hernia with small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal resection is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication, especially when it occurs after left hemicolectomy. While several studies have suggested that the closure of mesenteric defects may prevent internal hernias, the optimal preventive strategy has yet to be determined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe a surgical technique designed to reduce the risk of internal hernia after left-sided colorectal resection, involving complete mobilization of the proximal jejunum, followed by its alignment and fixation to the epiploic appendages over the reconstructed left mesocolon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From November 2024 to February 2025, the aforementioned surgical procedures were successfully performed in 25 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection with splenic flexure mobilization. No symptomatic or asymptomatic internal hernias were observed during the follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan (3-6 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel technique has the potential to reduce internal hernias. Further studies are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12743020/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145822163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03270-9
Zi Qin Ng, Jih Huei Tan
This case report describes the laparoscopic technique of infrapyloric lymph node dissection as part of a complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right-sided colon cancer. While controversial and not routinely performed, this extended dissection is indicated in the presence of specific risk factors for nodal metastasis, such as elevated CEA (> 17 ng/ml) and obstructive symptoms, as presented in our 88-year-old patient. The article outlines the key surgical steps to safely clear the infrapyloric region, emphasizing ligation of the right gastroepiploic vessels and meticulous dissection to minimize bleeding and chyle leakage.
{"title":"Laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy with CME, CVL and division of right gastroepiploic vessels.","authors":"Zi Qin Ng, Jih Huei Tan","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03270-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03270-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This case report describes the laparoscopic technique of infrapyloric lymph node dissection as part of a complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right-sided colon cancer. While controversial and not routinely performed, this extended dissection is indicated in the presence of specific risk factors for nodal metastasis, such as elevated CEA (> 17 ng/ml) and obstructive symptoms, as presented in our 88-year-old patient. The article outlines the key surgical steps to safely clear the infrapyloric region, emphasizing ligation of the right gastroepiploic vessels and meticulous dissection to minimize bleeding and chyle leakage.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12819431/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145811949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03266-5
Marije A Boom, Esther C J Consten
{"title":"Mesh in rectopexy: biological, synthetic, or hybrid?","authors":"Marije A Boom, Esther C J Consten","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03266-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03266-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12727842/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145811942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03240-1
A J M Pronk, J Y van Oostendorp, I J M Han-Geurts, S Madelska, C J Buskens, W A Bemelman
Introduction: Perianal fistulas often require multiple surgical interventions because of their chronic nature. Various sphincter-sparing techniques achieve clinical closure rates of up to 70%, yet recurrence remains a major challenge. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy has shown promise in wound healing, but its application in perianal fistulas remains largely unexplored. The Semiflex catheter was developed to facilitate outpatient vacuum therapy without the need for general anesthesia during catheter exchanges. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical applicability of the Semiflex catheter in perianal fistula management.
Methods: The Semiflex pilot study was a two-part feasibility trial. The first part assessed proof of principle in ten patients, while the second part, a multicentre study, aimed to confirm feasibility in 20 patients. Feasibility included smoothness of insertion and changing of the Semiflex catheters, capability of proper fixation of the Semiflex catheter, maintaining vacuum for more than 48 h, and compliance to the therapy in terms of pain and discomfort. The protocol was scored feasible if at least 50% of the exchanges met all these criteria in at least 70% of patients. Secondary outcomes included clinical fistula closure, radiological healing, and treatment-related adverse events.
Results: Twenty patients were included (median age 39.5 years; 70% Crohn's disease). Thirteen Semiflex treatments were scored as feasible, below the predefined threshold. Clinical fistula closure was observed in 50% of patients, but none showed radiological healing at 3 months. One serious adverse event occurred, requiring early treatment discontinuation, while minor complications, including local skin reactions and pressure sores, were managed conservatively.
Conclusions: Semiflex therapy was feasible in a subset of patients and allowed outpatient treatment. However, maintaining vacuum and achieving long-term fistula closure remains challenging. While Semiflex may have a role in perianal fistula management, further research is needed to refine patient selection and optimize its application.
{"title":"Semiflex-assisted vacuum therapy for perianal fistulas: the Semiflex pilot study.","authors":"A J M Pronk, J Y van Oostendorp, I J M Han-Geurts, S Madelska, C J Buskens, W A Bemelman","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03240-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03240-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Perianal fistulas often require multiple surgical interventions because of their chronic nature. Various sphincter-sparing techniques achieve clinical closure rates of up to 70%, yet recurrence remains a major challenge. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy has shown promise in wound healing, but its application in perianal fistulas remains largely unexplored. The Semiflex catheter was developed to facilitate outpatient vacuum therapy without the need for general anesthesia during catheter exchanges. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical applicability of the Semiflex catheter in perianal fistula management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Semiflex pilot study was a two-part feasibility trial. The first part assessed proof of principle in ten patients, while the second part, a multicentre study, aimed to confirm feasibility in 20 patients. Feasibility included smoothness of insertion and changing of the Semiflex catheters, capability of proper fixation of the Semiflex catheter, maintaining vacuum for more than 48 h, and compliance to the therapy in terms of pain and discomfort. The protocol was scored feasible if at least 50% of the exchanges met all these criteria in at least 70% of patients. Secondary outcomes included clinical fistula closure, radiological healing, and treatment-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients were included (median age 39.5 years; 70% Crohn's disease). Thirteen Semiflex treatments were scored as feasible, below the predefined threshold. Clinical fistula closure was observed in 50% of patients, but none showed radiological healing at 3 months. One serious adverse event occurred, requiring early treatment discontinuation, while minor complications, including local skin reactions and pressure sores, were managed conservatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Semiflex therapy was feasible in a subset of patients and allowed outpatient treatment. However, maintaining vacuum and achieving long-term fistula closure remains challenging. While Semiflex may have a role in perianal fistula management, further research is needed to refine patient selection and optimize its application.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12685983/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03236-x
Alessandro Ferdinando Ruffolo, Tomaso Melocchi, Chrystèle Rubod, Yohan Kerbage, Giuseppe Campagna, Sara Mastrovito, Alfredo Ercoli, Giovanni Panico, Michel Cosson, Marine Lallemant
Introduction: Limited data exists in literature regarding concomitant ventral rectopexy (VRP) and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy (SCP/SHP), with existing studies being predominantly retrospective. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the anatomical and functional outcomes of combined VRP and SCP/SHP for the treatment of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
Methods: We performed systematic research and meta-analysis from PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, until 15 January 2025. Women submitted to VRP with SCP/SHP were included. Improvement of anorectal symptoms were evaluated. Postoperative anatomical relapse was reported. Re-operation rates were evaluated.
Results: Six articles were included. Constipation/obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) [odds ratio (OR) 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.68; p = 0.006 (I2 test 81%, p = 0.56)] and of anal/fecal incontinence (AI/FI) rates [OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03-0.30; p < 0.0001 (I2 test 70%, p = 0.04)] significantly improved after combined VRP and SCP/SHP. The proportion metanalysis of four included studies reported a subjective POP recurrence rate of 7% (95% CI 1-13%; I2 test 82.9%, p < 0.001). The proportion metanalysis of five included studies for objective POP recurrence was 5% (95% CI 1-9%; I2 test 56.9%, p = 0.041). No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusions: VRP combined with SCP/SHP has been shown to be safe and effective for women with multicompartment POP, providing optimal anatomical and functional outcomes. Larger, long-term, prospective-controlled studies are needed to confirm these results.
文献中关于腹侧直肠固定术(VRP)和骶结肠/子宫固定术(SCP/SHP)的数据有限,现有的研究主要是回顾性的。本荟萃分析的目的是评估VRP和SCP/SHP联合治疗多房室盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的解剖和功能结果。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA) 2020指南的首选报告项目,我们从PubMed/MEDLINE和EMBASE进行了系统研究和荟萃分析,直到2025年1月15日。患有SCP/SHP的妇女被纳入VRP。评估肛门直肠症状的改善情况。术后解剖复发均有报道。评估再手术率。结果:纳入6篇文章。便秘/排便障碍综合征(ODS)[优势比(OR) 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.68;p = 0.006 (I2试验81%,p = 0.56)]和肛门/大便失禁(AI/FI)发生率[OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03-0.30;p 2检验70%,p = 0.04)], VRP与SCP/SHP联合治疗后显著改善。四项纳入研究的比例元分析报告主观POP复发率为7% (95% CI 1-13%; I2检验82.9%,p 2检验56.9%,p = 0.041)。无严重不良事件报告。结论:VRP联合SCP/SHP已被证明是安全有效的治疗女性多室POP,提供最佳的解剖和功能结果。需要更大规模的、长期的、前瞻性对照研究来证实这些结果。
{"title":"Anatomical and functional outcomes of combined ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Alessandro Ferdinando Ruffolo, Tomaso Melocchi, Chrystèle Rubod, Yohan Kerbage, Giuseppe Campagna, Sara Mastrovito, Alfredo Ercoli, Giovanni Panico, Michel Cosson, Marine Lallemant","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03236-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03236-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Limited data exists in literature regarding concomitant ventral rectopexy (VRP) and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy (SCP/SHP), with existing studies being predominantly retrospective. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the anatomical and functional outcomes of combined VRP and SCP/SHP for the treatment of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse (POP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed systematic research and meta-analysis from PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, until 15 January 2025. Women submitted to VRP with SCP/SHP were included. Improvement of anorectal symptoms were evaluated. Postoperative anatomical relapse was reported. Re-operation rates were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six articles were included. Constipation/obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) [odds ratio (OR) 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.68; p = 0.006 (I<sup>2</sup> test 81%, p = 0.56)] and of anal/fecal incontinence (AI/FI) rates [OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03-0.30; p < 0.0001 (I<sup>2</sup> test 70%, p = 0.04)] significantly improved after combined VRP and SCP/SHP. The proportion metanalysis of four included studies reported a subjective POP recurrence rate of 7% (95% CI 1-13%; I<sup>2</sup> test 82.9%, p < 0.001). The proportion metanalysis of five included studies for objective POP recurrence was 5% (95% CI 1-9%; I<sup>2</sup> test 56.9%, p = 0.041). No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VRP combined with SCP/SHP has been shown to be safe and effective for women with multicompartment POP, providing optimal anatomical and functional outcomes. Larger, long-term, prospective-controlled studies are needed to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12685978/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}