Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03243-y
S Zheng, Z Xu, F Deng, S Wang, T Qian, P Lin, C Wang, W Wang, Y Xia, L Xu, Z Zhang
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a global health concern, underscoring the importance of effective bowel preparation for diagnostic procedures such as colonoscopy. This randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of orally administered mannitol and polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions for repeat colonoscopy in patients with inadequate bowel preparation.
Methods: This prospective, open-label, noninferiority, blinded end point, randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled patients from two centers. Participants aged 18-75 years with Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores ≤ 1 in any colon segment were included. The study employed a 1-L mannitol or PEG solution, with primary outcomes assessed using BBPS scores. The secondary outcomes included adverse events, taste preferences, and patient satisfaction. A simple randomization strategy was employed, and both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were conducted.
Results: A total of 134 patients were included in the study, and the trial demonstrated the noninferiority of mannitol compared to PEG in achieving adequate bowel preparation (difference 3.0%, 95% confidence interval - 5.0 to 11.0%). Mannitol exhibited favorable trends in BBPS scores, highlighting its effectiveness. The safety profiles of the two solutions were comparable, with a low incidence of adverse events (17.9% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.825). Notably, mannitol outperformed PEG in terms of patient satisfaction and a greater inclination for reuse.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that orally administered mannitol is not inferior to orally administered PEG in patients with inadequate bowel preparation.
Registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05912114. Registered on 12/6/2023.
背景:结直肠癌(CRC)仍然是一个全球性的健康问题,强调了有效的肠道准备对结肠镜检查等诊断程序的重要性。这项随机对照试验旨在比较口服甘露醇和聚乙二醇(PEG)溶液对肠道准备不充分的患者进行重复结肠镜检查的疗效和耐受性。方法:这项前瞻性、开放标签、非劣效性、盲法终点、随机对照临床试验纳入了来自两个中心的患者。年龄在18-75岁之间,任一结肠段波士顿肠准备量表(BBPS)评分≤1分的参与者被纳入研究。该研究采用1升甘露醇或PEG溶液,主要结果使用BBPS评分评估。次要结局包括不良事件、口味偏好和患者满意度。采用简单的随机化策略,并进行意向治疗(ITT)和每个方案(PP)分析。结果:研究共纳入134例患者,试验证明甘露醇与PEG相比在实现充分的肠道准备方面具有非劣效性(差异3.0%,95%置信区间- 5.0至11.0%)。甘露醇在BBPS评分中表现出良好的趋势,突出了其有效性。两种方案的安全性具有可比性,不良事件发生率较低(17.9% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.825)。值得注意的是,甘露醇在患者满意度和更大的重复使用倾向方面优于PEG。结论:研究结果表明,口服甘露醇对肠准备不充分患者的治疗效果并不逊于口服聚乙二醇。注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05912114。于2023年6月12日注册
{"title":"Comparing the efficacy of mannitol and polyethylene glycol in treating patients with poor bowel preparation: a randomized controlled clinical study.","authors":"S Zheng, Z Xu, F Deng, S Wang, T Qian, P Lin, C Wang, W Wang, Y Xia, L Xu, Z Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03243-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03243-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a global health concern, underscoring the importance of effective bowel preparation for diagnostic procedures such as colonoscopy. This randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of orally administered mannitol and polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions for repeat colonoscopy in patients with inadequate bowel preparation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, open-label, noninferiority, blinded end point, randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled patients from two centers. Participants aged 18-75 years with Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores ≤ 1 in any colon segment were included. The study employed a 1-L mannitol or PEG solution, with primary outcomes assessed using BBPS scores. The secondary outcomes included adverse events, taste preferences, and patient satisfaction. A simple randomization strategy was employed, and both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 134 patients were included in the study, and the trial demonstrated the noninferiority of mannitol compared to PEG in achieving adequate bowel preparation (difference 3.0%, 95% confidence interval - 5.0 to 11.0%). Mannitol exhibited favorable trends in BBPS scores, highlighting its effectiveness. The safety profiles of the two solutions were comparable, with a low incidence of adverse events (17.9% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.825). Notably, mannitol outperformed PEG in terms of patient satisfaction and a greater inclination for reuse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that orally administered mannitol is not inferior to orally administered PEG in patients with inadequate bowel preparation.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05912114. Registered on 12/6/2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12775070/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145829029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03253-w
Z Zheng, Z Chen, X Wang, D Ye, X Lu, Y Huang, P Chi
Background: Internal hernia with small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal resection is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication, especially when it occurs after left hemicolectomy. While several studies have suggested that the closure of mesenteric defects may prevent internal hernias, the optimal preventive strategy has yet to be determined.
Methods: We describe a surgical technique designed to reduce the risk of internal hernia after left-sided colorectal resection, involving complete mobilization of the proximal jejunum, followed by its alignment and fixation to the epiploic appendages over the reconstructed left mesocolon.
Results: From November 2024 to February 2025, the aforementioned surgical procedures were successfully performed in 25 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection with splenic flexure mobilization. No symptomatic or asymptomatic internal hernias were observed during the follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan (3-6 months).
Conclusions: This novel technique has the potential to reduce internal hernias. Further studies are required.
{"title":"Novel and simple technique to prevent internal hernias after laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resection: alignment and fixation of the proximal jejunum.","authors":"Z Zheng, Z Chen, X Wang, D Ye, X Lu, Y Huang, P Chi","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03253-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03253-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Internal hernia with small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal resection is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication, especially when it occurs after left hemicolectomy. While several studies have suggested that the closure of mesenteric defects may prevent internal hernias, the optimal preventive strategy has yet to be determined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe a surgical technique designed to reduce the risk of internal hernia after left-sided colorectal resection, involving complete mobilization of the proximal jejunum, followed by its alignment and fixation to the epiploic appendages over the reconstructed left mesocolon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From November 2024 to February 2025, the aforementioned surgical procedures were successfully performed in 25 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection with splenic flexure mobilization. No symptomatic or asymptomatic internal hernias were observed during the follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan (3-6 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel technique has the potential to reduce internal hernias. Further studies are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12743020/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145822163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03270-9
Zi Qin Ng, Jih Huei Tan
This case report describes the laparoscopic technique of infrapyloric lymph node dissection as part of a complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right-sided colon cancer. While controversial and not routinely performed, this extended dissection is indicated in the presence of specific risk factors for nodal metastasis, such as elevated CEA (> 17 ng/ml) and obstructive symptoms, as presented in our 88-year-old patient. The article outlines the key surgical steps to safely clear the infrapyloric region, emphasizing ligation of the right gastroepiploic vessels and meticulous dissection to minimize bleeding and chyle leakage.
{"title":"Laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy with CME, CVL and division of right gastroepiploic vessels.","authors":"Zi Qin Ng, Jih Huei Tan","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03270-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03270-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This case report describes the laparoscopic technique of infrapyloric lymph node dissection as part of a complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right-sided colon cancer. While controversial and not routinely performed, this extended dissection is indicated in the presence of specific risk factors for nodal metastasis, such as elevated CEA (> 17 ng/ml) and obstructive symptoms, as presented in our 88-year-old patient. The article outlines the key surgical steps to safely clear the infrapyloric region, emphasizing ligation of the right gastroepiploic vessels and meticulous dissection to minimize bleeding and chyle leakage.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12819431/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145811949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03266-5
Marije A Boom, Esther C J Consten
{"title":"Mesh in rectopexy: biological, synthetic, or hybrid?","authors":"Marije A Boom, Esther C J Consten","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03266-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03266-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12727842/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145811942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03240-1
A J M Pronk, J Y van Oostendorp, I J M Han-Geurts, S Madelska, C J Buskens, W A Bemelman
Introduction: Perianal fistulas often require multiple surgical interventions because of their chronic nature. Various sphincter-sparing techniques achieve clinical closure rates of up to 70%, yet recurrence remains a major challenge. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy has shown promise in wound healing, but its application in perianal fistulas remains largely unexplored. The Semiflex catheter was developed to facilitate outpatient vacuum therapy without the need for general anesthesia during catheter exchanges. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical applicability of the Semiflex catheter in perianal fistula management.
Methods: The Semiflex pilot study was a two-part feasibility trial. The first part assessed proof of principle in ten patients, while the second part, a multicentre study, aimed to confirm feasibility in 20 patients. Feasibility included smoothness of insertion and changing of the Semiflex catheters, capability of proper fixation of the Semiflex catheter, maintaining vacuum for more than 48 h, and compliance to the therapy in terms of pain and discomfort. The protocol was scored feasible if at least 50% of the exchanges met all these criteria in at least 70% of patients. Secondary outcomes included clinical fistula closure, radiological healing, and treatment-related adverse events.
Results: Twenty patients were included (median age 39.5 years; 70% Crohn's disease). Thirteen Semiflex treatments were scored as feasible, below the predefined threshold. Clinical fistula closure was observed in 50% of patients, but none showed radiological healing at 3 months. One serious adverse event occurred, requiring early treatment discontinuation, while minor complications, including local skin reactions and pressure sores, were managed conservatively.
Conclusions: Semiflex therapy was feasible in a subset of patients and allowed outpatient treatment. However, maintaining vacuum and achieving long-term fistula closure remains challenging. While Semiflex may have a role in perianal fistula management, further research is needed to refine patient selection and optimize its application.
{"title":"Semiflex-assisted vacuum therapy for perianal fistulas: the Semiflex pilot study.","authors":"A J M Pronk, J Y van Oostendorp, I J M Han-Geurts, S Madelska, C J Buskens, W A Bemelman","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03240-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03240-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Perianal fistulas often require multiple surgical interventions because of their chronic nature. Various sphincter-sparing techniques achieve clinical closure rates of up to 70%, yet recurrence remains a major challenge. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy has shown promise in wound healing, but its application in perianal fistulas remains largely unexplored. The Semiflex catheter was developed to facilitate outpatient vacuum therapy without the need for general anesthesia during catheter exchanges. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical applicability of the Semiflex catheter in perianal fistula management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Semiflex pilot study was a two-part feasibility trial. The first part assessed proof of principle in ten patients, while the second part, a multicentre study, aimed to confirm feasibility in 20 patients. Feasibility included smoothness of insertion and changing of the Semiflex catheters, capability of proper fixation of the Semiflex catheter, maintaining vacuum for more than 48 h, and compliance to the therapy in terms of pain and discomfort. The protocol was scored feasible if at least 50% of the exchanges met all these criteria in at least 70% of patients. Secondary outcomes included clinical fistula closure, radiological healing, and treatment-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients were included (median age 39.5 years; 70% Crohn's disease). Thirteen Semiflex treatments were scored as feasible, below the predefined threshold. Clinical fistula closure was observed in 50% of patients, but none showed radiological healing at 3 months. One serious adverse event occurred, requiring early treatment discontinuation, while minor complications, including local skin reactions and pressure sores, were managed conservatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Semiflex therapy was feasible in a subset of patients and allowed outpatient treatment. However, maintaining vacuum and achieving long-term fistula closure remains challenging. While Semiflex may have a role in perianal fistula management, further research is needed to refine patient selection and optimize its application.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12685983/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03236-x
Alessandro Ferdinando Ruffolo, Tomaso Melocchi, Chrystèle Rubod, Yohan Kerbage, Giuseppe Campagna, Sara Mastrovito, Alfredo Ercoli, Giovanni Panico, Michel Cosson, Marine Lallemant
Introduction: Limited data exists in literature regarding concomitant ventral rectopexy (VRP) and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy (SCP/SHP), with existing studies being predominantly retrospective. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the anatomical and functional outcomes of combined VRP and SCP/SHP for the treatment of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
Methods: We performed systematic research and meta-analysis from PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, until 15 January 2025. Women submitted to VRP with SCP/SHP were included. Improvement of anorectal symptoms were evaluated. Postoperative anatomical relapse was reported. Re-operation rates were evaluated.
Results: Six articles were included. Constipation/obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) [odds ratio (OR) 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.68; p = 0.006 (I2 test 81%, p = 0.56)] and of anal/fecal incontinence (AI/FI) rates [OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03-0.30; p < 0.0001 (I2 test 70%, p = 0.04)] significantly improved after combined VRP and SCP/SHP. The proportion metanalysis of four included studies reported a subjective POP recurrence rate of 7% (95% CI 1-13%; I2 test 82.9%, p < 0.001). The proportion metanalysis of five included studies for objective POP recurrence was 5% (95% CI 1-9%; I2 test 56.9%, p = 0.041). No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusions: VRP combined with SCP/SHP has been shown to be safe and effective for women with multicompartment POP, providing optimal anatomical and functional outcomes. Larger, long-term, prospective-controlled studies are needed to confirm these results.
文献中关于腹侧直肠固定术(VRP)和骶结肠/子宫固定术(SCP/SHP)的数据有限,现有的研究主要是回顾性的。本荟萃分析的目的是评估VRP和SCP/SHP联合治疗多房室盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的解剖和功能结果。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA) 2020指南的首选报告项目,我们从PubMed/MEDLINE和EMBASE进行了系统研究和荟萃分析,直到2025年1月15日。患有SCP/SHP的妇女被纳入VRP。评估肛门直肠症状的改善情况。术后解剖复发均有报道。评估再手术率。结果:纳入6篇文章。便秘/排便障碍综合征(ODS)[优势比(OR) 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.68;p = 0.006 (I2试验81%,p = 0.56)]和肛门/大便失禁(AI/FI)发生率[OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03-0.30;p 2检验70%,p = 0.04)], VRP与SCP/SHP联合治疗后显著改善。四项纳入研究的比例元分析报告主观POP复发率为7% (95% CI 1-13%; I2检验82.9%,p 2检验56.9%,p = 0.041)。无严重不良事件报告。结论:VRP联合SCP/SHP已被证明是安全有效的治疗女性多室POP,提供最佳的解剖和功能结果。需要更大规模的、长期的、前瞻性对照研究来证实这些结果。
{"title":"Anatomical and functional outcomes of combined ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Alessandro Ferdinando Ruffolo, Tomaso Melocchi, Chrystèle Rubod, Yohan Kerbage, Giuseppe Campagna, Sara Mastrovito, Alfredo Ercoli, Giovanni Panico, Michel Cosson, Marine Lallemant","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03236-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03236-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Limited data exists in literature regarding concomitant ventral rectopexy (VRP) and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy (SCP/SHP), with existing studies being predominantly retrospective. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the anatomical and functional outcomes of combined VRP and SCP/SHP for the treatment of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse (POP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed systematic research and meta-analysis from PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, until 15 January 2025. Women submitted to VRP with SCP/SHP were included. Improvement of anorectal symptoms were evaluated. Postoperative anatomical relapse was reported. Re-operation rates were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six articles were included. Constipation/obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) [odds ratio (OR) 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.68; p = 0.006 (I<sup>2</sup> test 81%, p = 0.56)] and of anal/fecal incontinence (AI/FI) rates [OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03-0.30; p < 0.0001 (I<sup>2</sup> test 70%, p = 0.04)] significantly improved after combined VRP and SCP/SHP. The proportion metanalysis of four included studies reported a subjective POP recurrence rate of 7% (95% CI 1-13%; I<sup>2</sup> test 82.9%, p < 0.001). The proportion metanalysis of five included studies for objective POP recurrence was 5% (95% CI 1-9%; I<sup>2</sup> test 56.9%, p = 0.041). No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VRP combined with SCP/SHP has been shown to be safe and effective for women with multicompartment POP, providing optimal anatomical and functional outcomes. Larger, long-term, prospective-controlled studies are needed to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12685978/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03242-z
T Pelly, E Anand, S Holubar, P Tozer, A Hart
Introduction: Unhealed wounds and persistent perineal sinuses (PPS) may occur in as many as one third of patients after proctectomy for Crohn's disease. The management of these conditions remains a significant challenge, particularly in the context of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with existing therapies plagued by high failure rates. This systematic review of the literature assessed the efficacy of medical and surgical therapy for PPS closure in IBD. Secondary aims included review of classification systems used for PPS.
Methods: A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases on 17 December 2024. The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024622582). Inclusion criteria were adult patients with IBD and PPS or unhealed wounds following proctectomy. We excluded abstract-only publications, case reports, cancer and paediatric cohorts. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts and extracted data. The primary outcome was clinical healing rate. Secondary outcomes included classification systems used to describe PPS. Risk of bias was assessed.
Results: Of 496 records identified, following removal of duplicates, 489 abstracts were screened, and 60 full text articles assessed for eligibility. Of 25 articles included in the final analysis, 23 were case series or retrospective cohort studies, and all were at high risk of bias. No randomised controlled trials were identified. Five articles (including two of the case series) described classification systems for PPS. Interventions included hyperbaric oxygen therapy, Karydakis flap, cleft closure, omentoplasty, skin grafting, gracilis and rectus abdominis flap, platelet-derived growth factor, curettage, lay open and excision of sinuses. Reported healing rates ranged from 30% to 100%. Heterogeneity in the reporting of outcomes, as well as the interventions performed precluded meta-analysis.
Conclusion: The published evidence for treatment of PPS in IBD consists of low-quality evidence case series with high risk of bias. There is a need for standardised outcome reporting and high-quality, prospective studies to establish effective treatment algorithms.
{"title":"Systematic review: The management of unhealed wounds and persistent perineal sinuses following proctectomy in inflammatory bowel disease.","authors":"T Pelly, E Anand, S Holubar, P Tozer, A Hart","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03242-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03242-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Unhealed wounds and persistent perineal sinuses (PPS) may occur in as many as one third of patients after proctectomy for Crohn's disease. The management of these conditions remains a significant challenge, particularly in the context of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with existing therapies plagued by high failure rates. This systematic review of the literature assessed the efficacy of medical and surgical therapy for PPS closure in IBD. Secondary aims included review of classification systems used for PPS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases on 17 December 2024. The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024622582). Inclusion criteria were adult patients with IBD and PPS or unhealed wounds following proctectomy. We excluded abstract-only publications, case reports, cancer and paediatric cohorts. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts and extracted data. The primary outcome was clinical healing rate. Secondary outcomes included classification systems used to describe PPS. Risk of bias was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 496 records identified, following removal of duplicates, 489 abstracts were screened, and 60 full text articles assessed for eligibility. Of 25 articles included in the final analysis, 23 were case series or retrospective cohort studies, and all were at high risk of bias. No randomised controlled trials were identified. Five articles (including two of the case series) described classification systems for PPS. Interventions included hyperbaric oxygen therapy, Karydakis flap, cleft closure, omentoplasty, skin grafting, gracilis and rectus abdominis flap, platelet-derived growth factor, curettage, lay open and excision of sinuses. Reported healing rates ranged from 30% to 100%. Heterogeneity in the reporting of outcomes, as well as the interventions performed precluded meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The published evidence for treatment of PPS in IBD consists of low-quality evidence case series with high risk of bias. There is a need for standardised outcome reporting and high-quality, prospective studies to establish effective treatment algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12686021/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03239-8
J Bunni, E D Courtney
{"title":"Techniques in coloproctology - controversies in coloproctology resection: rectopexy is an underutilised procedure in the management of both symptomatic high-grade internal and external rectal prolapse.","authors":"J Bunni, E D Courtney","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03239-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03239-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12678511/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145670676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03220-5
A Sahin
{"title":"From prediction to clinical action in colorectal surgery: rethinking DLNN use for postoperative risk.","authors":"A Sahin","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03220-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03220-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12669326/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145649949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-28DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03241-0
A Troester, J Frebault, E Von Der Marwitz, E Arsoniadis, S M Goldberg, P Goffredo, C Jahansouz
Background: Transsphincteric anal fistula is a common and challenging diagnosis for patients and surgeons alike. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) following non-cutting seton placement represents an established definitive treatment with many technical variations. Unfortunately, up to 53% of attempted LIFTs fail. We aim to describe a modified LIFT approach and evaluate outcomes at our institution.
Methods: Thirty-two patients from 2021 to 2024 underwent the modified LIFT approach which included the offsetting of the transected fistula ends with interposing muscle plication, along with closure of the internal opening, and wide excision of the external opening. Retrospective chart review was performed to assess rates of primary wound healing, complications, recurrence, and incontinence. Recurrences were grouped into three types: type I, sinus tract or recurrent abscess without an internal opening; type II, conversion to an intersphincteric fistula; and type III, transsphincteric recurrence.
Results: The majority of patients were male (69%) with a mean age of 44 years and mean BMI 31.6 kg/m2. Median operative time was 88 min. Primary healing rate was 94%. Median healing period was 7 (range 4-16) weeks. Of the 10 recurrences, (5 type I, 5 type II, and 0 type III), median time to recurrence was 6 months after the primary wound healed. No patients experienced any postoperative incontinence or urinary retention.
Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with transsphincteric fistulas undergoing the LIFT procedure, the addition of offsetting muscle plication effectively limited transsphincteric recurrence. Further investigation is warranted to directly compare this LIFT adaptation to previously published literature.
{"title":"A modified LIFT approach of offsetting sphincter muscle plication aimed at decreasing recurrence rates: a single-center retrospective review.","authors":"A Troester, J Frebault, E Von Der Marwitz, E Arsoniadis, S M Goldberg, P Goffredo, C Jahansouz","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03241-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03241-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transsphincteric anal fistula is a common and challenging diagnosis for patients and surgeons alike. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) following non-cutting seton placement represents an established definitive treatment with many technical variations. Unfortunately, up to 53% of attempted LIFTs fail. We aim to describe a modified LIFT approach and evaluate outcomes at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two patients from 2021 to 2024 underwent the modified LIFT approach which included the offsetting of the transected fistula ends with interposing muscle plication, along with closure of the internal opening, and wide excision of the external opening. Retrospective chart review was performed to assess rates of primary wound healing, complications, recurrence, and incontinence. Recurrences were grouped into three types: type I, sinus tract or recurrent abscess without an internal opening; type II, conversion to an intersphincteric fistula; and type III, transsphincteric recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of patients were male (69%) with a mean age of 44 years and mean BMI 31.6 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Median operative time was 88 min. Primary healing rate was 94%. Median healing period was 7 (range 4-16) weeks. Of the 10 recurrences, (5 type I, 5 type II, and 0 type III), median time to recurrence was 6 months after the primary wound healed. No patients experienced any postoperative incontinence or urinary retention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort of patients with transsphincteric fistulas undergoing the LIFT procedure, the addition of offsetting muscle plication effectively limited transsphincteric recurrence. Further investigation is warranted to directly compare this LIFT adaptation to previously published literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12753536/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145642334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}