Pub Date : 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03238-9
S Fritz, J Kirsch, N Schneider, J Kirsch, C Reissfelder, A Herold, D Bussen
Background: Acute anal fissure is a common cause of severe pain in the anorectal region. The standard treatment is the topical application of a calcium channel blocker or glyceryl trinitrate. Despite acute anal fissure being a common proctologic condition, data on the healing rates and long-term outcomes remain scarce. This study aimed to evaluate data from our centre, with a special focus on long-term follow-up and recurrent disease.
Methods: All consecutive patients who presented with acute anal fissure between January 2016 and December 2016 were retrospectively identified. Patients were included if their clinical symptoms lasted for less than 6 weeks, secondary changes to fissure morphology were absent, and data from follow-up examinations were available. Clinical features, symptoms, therapy and long-term outcomes were evaluated.
Results: A total of 623 patients with a median age of 45 years were included; 342/623 patients were female (54.9%). The median follow-up period was 41 months (range 6 weeks-89 months), and 39.5% of the patients had a follow-up duration exceeding 5 years. Most fissures occurred in the 6 o'clock lithotomy position (63.7%), in the 12 o'clock position (21.0%), or in both (4.5%). In 67/623 patients, the fissure was in an atypical region (10.8%). In 439/623 patients, the fissure healed completely (70.5%). A total of 8.7% of the patients underwent fissurectomy, and 180/623 patients experienced recurrence (28.9%).
Conclusions: The management of acute anal fissure can be challenging because recurrence is common. Conservative management is successful in the majority of cases. Surgery is necessary only for a minority of patients.
{"title":"Therapy and long-term outcomes of acute anal fissure: a high-volume referral centre experience with 623 patients.","authors":"S Fritz, J Kirsch, N Schneider, J Kirsch, C Reissfelder, A Herold, D Bussen","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03238-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03238-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute anal fissure is a common cause of severe pain in the anorectal region. The standard treatment is the topical application of a calcium channel blocker or glyceryl trinitrate. Despite acute anal fissure being a common proctologic condition, data on the healing rates and long-term outcomes remain scarce. This study aimed to evaluate data from our centre, with a special focus on long-term follow-up and recurrent disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients who presented with acute anal fissure between January 2016 and December 2016 were retrospectively identified. Patients were included if their clinical symptoms lasted for less than 6 weeks, secondary changes to fissure morphology were absent, and data from follow-up examinations were available. Clinical features, symptoms, therapy and long-term outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 623 patients with a median age of 45 years were included; 342/623 patients were female (54.9%). The median follow-up period was 41 months (range 6 weeks-89 months), and 39.5% of the patients had a follow-up duration exceeding 5 years. Most fissures occurred in the 6 o'clock lithotomy position (63.7%), in the 12 o'clock position (21.0%), or in both (4.5%). In 67/623 patients, the fissure was in an atypical region (10.8%). In 439/623 patients, the fissure healed completely (70.5%). A total of 8.7% of the patients underwent fissurectomy, and 180/623 patients experienced recurrence (28.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The management of acute anal fissure can be challenging because recurrence is common. Conservative management is successful in the majority of cases. Surgery is necessary only for a minority of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12775085/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-30DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03245-w
C Sun, X Zhang, S Huang, H Sun, L Chang, P Xu, C Li, Y Zhang, X Cui, Z Xiao, R Chen, M Yu, Y Chen
Background: Magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection (MAG-ESD) has significant advantages in the treatment of difficult lesions (Mortagy et al. in World J Gastroenterol 23:2883-2890, 2017). However, the main problem of MAG-ESD is that the placement of the magnetic anchor in vivo often requires the withdrawal and reinsertion of the endoscope, which prolongs the operation time (Zhang et al. in Tech Coloproctol 27:679-683, 2023). We introduced a novel technique, magnetic hydrogel-assisted ESD, and compared it with conventional ESD to explore its advantages and disadvantages.
Methods: We uniformly configured 0.5% sodium alginate (Sanchez-Ballester et al. in Carbohydr Polym 270:118399, 2021) (SA) solution, 1% CaCl2 solution and nano-Fe3O4 (Chen et al. in Electromagn Biol Med 34:309-316, 2015) to produce a magnet hydrogel with ideal ratios. Fresh isolated porcine colons were used as a model; these were divided into a magnetic hydrogel-assisted ESD group and conventional ESD group to assess whether magnetic hydrogel-assisted ESD was feasible and advantageous.
Results: The median submucosal dissection time for magnetic hydrogel-assisted ESD (MHA-ESD) and conventional ESD was 15.13 min (IQR 11.21-19.05) and 17.89 min (IQR 13.74-22.04), respectively. The submucosal dissection time for MHA-ESD was significantly shorter compared to conventional ESD (P = 0.0368). Similarly, the submucosal dissection speed for MHA-ESD and conventional ESD was 74.81 mm2/min (IQR 72.18-80.39) and 60.86 mm2/min (IQR 58.96-67.77), respectively. The MHA-ESD group demonstrated a significantly faster submucosal dissection speed compared to the conventional ESD group (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Compared with conventional ESD, MHA-ESD significantly accelerates the speed of submucosal dissection, effectively improves surgical efficiency, and enhances procedural convenience, thereby reducing the overall difficulty of ESD.
背景:磁锚引导下内镜粘膜下剥离术(magg - esd)在治疗难治病变方面具有显著优势(Mortagy et al. in World J Gastroenterol 23:2883-2890, 2017)。然而,MAG-ESD的主要问题是,在体内放置磁锚通常需要取出和重新插入内窥镜,这延长了手术时间(Zhang et al. in Tech Coloproctol 27:7 79- 683,2023)。本文介绍了一种新型的磁水凝胶辅助静电放电技术,并将其与传统静电放电技术进行了比较,探讨了其优缺点。方法:将0.5%海藻酸钠(Sanchez-Ballester et al. in Carbohydr Polym 270:118399, 2021) (SA)溶液、1% CaCl2溶液和纳米fe3o4 (Chen et al. in Electromagn Biol Med 34:309-316, 2015)均匀配制成理想比例的磁性水凝胶。以新鲜分离的猪结肠为模型;将这些患者分为磁性水凝胶辅助ESD组和常规ESD组,以评估磁性水凝胶辅助ESD是否可行和有利。结果:磁性水凝胶辅助ESD (MHA-ESD)与常规ESD的中位粘膜下剥离时间分别为15.13 min (IQR 11.21 ~ 19.05)和17.89 min (IQR 13.74 ~ 22.04)。与常规ESD相比,MHA-ESD的粘膜下剥离时间明显缩短(P = 0.0368)。同样,MHA-ESD和常规ESD的粘膜下剥离速度分别为74.81 mm2/min (IQR 72.18-80.39)和60.86 mm2/min (IQR 58.96-67.77)。与常规ESD组相比,MHA-ESD组粘膜下剥离速度明显加快(P)。结论:与常规ESD组相比,MHA-ESD显著加快了粘膜下剥离速度,有效提高了手术效率,提高了手术的便利性,从而降低了ESD的整体难度。
{"title":"Magnetic hydrogel-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection of large intestine in vitro animal experimental study.","authors":"C Sun, X Zhang, S Huang, H Sun, L Chang, P Xu, C Li, Y Zhang, X Cui, Z Xiao, R Chen, M Yu, Y Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03245-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03245-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection (MAG-ESD) has significant advantages in the treatment of difficult lesions (Mortagy et al. in World J Gastroenterol 23:2883-2890, 2017). However, the main problem of MAG-ESD is that the placement of the magnetic anchor in vivo often requires the withdrawal and reinsertion of the endoscope, which prolongs the operation time (Zhang et al. in Tech Coloproctol 27:679-683, 2023). We introduced a novel technique, magnetic hydrogel-assisted ESD, and compared it with conventional ESD to explore its advantages and disadvantages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We uniformly configured 0.5% sodium alginate (Sanchez-Ballester et al. in Carbohydr Polym 270:118399, 2021) (SA) solution, 1% CaCl<sub>2</sub> solution and nano-Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> (Chen et al. in Electromagn Biol Med 34:309-316, 2015) to produce a magnet hydrogel with ideal ratios. Fresh isolated porcine colons were used as a model; these were divided into a magnetic hydrogel-assisted ESD group and conventional ESD group to assess whether magnetic hydrogel-assisted ESD was feasible and advantageous.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median submucosal dissection time for magnetic hydrogel-assisted ESD (MHA-ESD) and conventional ESD was 15.13 min (IQR 11.21-19.05) and 17.89 min (IQR 13.74-22.04), respectively. The submucosal dissection time for MHA-ESD was significantly shorter compared to conventional ESD (P = 0.0368). Similarly, the submucosal dissection speed for MHA-ESD and conventional ESD was 74.81 mm<sup>2</sup>/min (IQR 72.18-80.39) and 60.86 mm<sup>2</sup>/min (IQR 58.96-67.77), respectively. The MHA-ESD group demonstrated a significantly faster submucosal dissection speed compared to the conventional ESD group (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with conventional ESD, MHA-ESD significantly accelerates the speed of submucosal dissection, effectively improves surgical efficiency, and enhances procedural convenience, thereby reducing the overall difficulty of ESD.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12775096/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145866043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-30DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03250-z
C Smit, M L Janssen-Heijnen, F van Osch, M van Heinsbergen, J L M Konsten
Purpose: To report the quality of life (QoL) and functional outcomes in patients with colorectal disease after receiving treatment in a multidisciplinary, nurse-led low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) outpatient clinic post surgery.
Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted that included all patients with colorectal disease referred to the LARS outpatient clinic at VieCuri Medical Centre between January 2021 and December 2024. A standardized treatment protocol was implemented, complemented by a nurse-led component that enabled early symptom detection and provided accessible, intensive patient contact and follow-up. The structured five-phase protocol ranges from preoperative counseling and conservative management to multidisciplinary care and, if necessary, invasive interventions. Bowel function and quality of life were assessed pre- and post-treatment using validated instruments, including the LARS score, Wexner score, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-C29 questionnaires.
Results: A total of 96 patients were included. Median LARS scores decreased from 38.0 to 13.0 (p < 0.001), with 76% of patients transitioning from major to no LARS. Wexner scores improved from 11.0 to 2.0 (p < 0.001), and global QoL increased from 66.7 to 83.3 (p < 0.001). Pharmacological treatment was administered to 93% of patients, most commonly psyllium and loperamide. In addition, 85% were referred to a dietitian, 50% to pelvic floor physiotherapy, and 26% to a psychologist or sexologist. Transanal irrigation was introduced in 14% of cases. Only one patient required sacral neuromodulation, and one opted for a permanent stoma. The median follow-up consisted of three in-person and three telephone consultations per patient.
Conclusions: A multidisciplinary, nurse-led LARS clinic significantly improved bowel function and QoL in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). These findings support the implementation of structured, individualized care pathways for LARS management.
{"title":"The first Dutch experience with a nurse-led outpatient clinic for the prevention and treatment of LARS after colorectal surgery: promising results of a standardized treatment protocol.","authors":"C Smit, M L Janssen-Heijnen, F van Osch, M van Heinsbergen, J L M Konsten","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03250-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03250-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report the quality of life (QoL) and functional outcomes in patients with colorectal disease after receiving treatment in a multidisciplinary, nurse-led low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) outpatient clinic post surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted that included all patients with colorectal disease referred to the LARS outpatient clinic at VieCuri Medical Centre between January 2021 and December 2024. A standardized treatment protocol was implemented, complemented by a nurse-led component that enabled early symptom detection and provided accessible, intensive patient contact and follow-up. The structured five-phase protocol ranges from preoperative counseling and conservative management to multidisciplinary care and, if necessary, invasive interventions. Bowel function and quality of life were assessed pre- and post-treatment using validated instruments, including the LARS score, Wexner score, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-C29 questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 96 patients were included. Median LARS scores decreased from 38.0 to 13.0 (p < 0.001), with 76% of patients transitioning from major to no LARS. Wexner scores improved from 11.0 to 2.0 (p < 0.001), and global QoL increased from 66.7 to 83.3 (p < 0.001). Pharmacological treatment was administered to 93% of patients, most commonly psyllium and loperamide. In addition, 85% were referred to a dietitian, 50% to pelvic floor physiotherapy, and 26% to a psychologist or sexologist. Transanal irrigation was introduced in 14% of cases. Only one patient required sacral neuromodulation, and one opted for a permanent stoma. The median follow-up consisted of three in-person and three telephone consultations per patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A multidisciplinary, nurse-led LARS clinic significantly improved bowel function and QoL in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). These findings support the implementation of structured, individualized care pathways for LARS management.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12775045/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145866143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03188-2
E Cho, H S Ryu, J-S Kim, S-J Baek, J-M Kwak, J Kim
Background: For many surgeons performing laparoscopic colectomies, splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) remains one of the most technically challenging phases. To resolve challenges in laparoscopic SFM, we utilized Artisential®, a line of articulated laparoscopic instruments (ALI), to gain more freedom in traction and enlarge the visualized working space. We developed a study to demonstrate how Artisential® allowed for a more efficient usage of surgical space during splenic flexure mobilization without surgical quality.
Methods: This study consisted of two parts. First was a comparative analysis of dead space shown on screen during surgery with and without Artisential® usage. Video recordings of nine consecutive laparoscopic low anterior resections (LAR) performed by a single surgeon using an Artisential® grasper in the left (nondominant) hand were chosen as the experimental group. Among 43 LAR cases performed by the same surgeon in the previous year without the Artisential®, 9 cases most similar to the control were chosen by propensity score matching (PSM) of sex, age, distance from the anal verge, and preoperative chemoradiotherapy status. We compared the two groups in terms of average operation duration, postoperative complication severity, and the number of lymph nodes harvested.
Results: Using an Artisential® grasper for traction for splenic flexure mobilization during laparoscopic low anterior resections increased screen visualization by 11.8% compared with using conventional laparoscopic graspers. Length of operation, severity of postoperative complications, and number of harvested lymph nodes were comparable in both modalities.
Conclusions: Angulated traction was utilized for splenic flexure mobilization in laparoscopic low anterior resections using a grasper from Artisential®, a line of articulated laparoscopic instruments. The surgeon was able to create a significantly larger working field and better exposure of target structures. This implementation did not affect operation time, recovery, or specimen integrity.
{"title":"Enhanced exposure and visualization in splenic flexure mobilization with comparable perioperative outcomes: experience with Artisential<sup>®</sup> during laparoscopic low anterior resection.","authors":"E Cho, H S Ryu, J-S Kim, S-J Baek, J-M Kwak, J Kim","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03188-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03188-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For many surgeons performing laparoscopic colectomies, splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) remains one of the most technically challenging phases. To resolve challenges in laparoscopic SFM, we utilized Artisential<sup>®</sup>, a line of articulated laparoscopic instruments (ALI), to gain more freedom in traction and enlarge the visualized working space. We developed a study to demonstrate how Artisential<sup>®</sup> allowed for a more efficient usage of surgical space during splenic flexure mobilization without surgical quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study consisted of two parts. First was a comparative analysis of dead space shown on screen during surgery with and without Artisential<sup>®</sup> usage. Video recordings of nine consecutive laparoscopic low anterior resections (LAR) performed by a single surgeon using an Artisential<sup>®</sup> grasper in the left (nondominant) hand were chosen as the experimental group. Among 43 LAR cases performed by the same surgeon in the previous year without the Artisential<sup>®</sup>, 9 cases most similar to the control were chosen by propensity score matching (PSM) of sex, age, distance from the anal verge, and preoperative chemoradiotherapy status. We compared the two groups in terms of average operation duration, postoperative complication severity, and the number of lymph nodes harvested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using an Artisential<sup>®</sup> grasper for traction for splenic flexure mobilization during laparoscopic low anterior resections increased screen visualization by 11.8% compared with using conventional laparoscopic graspers. Length of operation, severity of postoperative complications, and number of harvested lymph nodes were comparable in both modalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Angulated traction was utilized for splenic flexure mobilization in laparoscopic low anterior resections using a grasper from Artisential<sup>®</sup>, a line of articulated laparoscopic instruments. The surgeon was able to create a significantly larger working field and better exposure of target structures. This implementation did not affect operation time, recovery, or specimen integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12748120/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145850683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03235-y
E Özoran, T Tüfekçi, T Aksan, E Eren, S N Karahan, A B Eden, I H Özata, D S Uymaz, A Rencüzoğulları, E Balık
Background: Preoperative stoma site marking by a wound, ostomy, and continence nurse (WOCN) or colorectal surgeons significantly reduces stoma-related complications. Limited access to WOCNs or colorectal surgeons, especially in rural or emergency settings, remains a barrier to optimal care. This study evaluated the feasibility and spatial accuracy of a novel telemedicine-based protocol for stoma site marking before colorectal surgery in settings with limited specialist access. The primary outcome was the spatial distance between the in-person and virtual markings. Accuracy was classified as exact same point, within < 1 cm, 1-2 cm, or > 2 cm.
Methods: This prospective observational pilot study was planned in a tertiary academic medical center. Healthy adult volunteers with no prior abdominal surgery were enrolled in the study. Each participant underwent two independent stoma markings: one by an in-person WOCN and another by a different WOCN using standardized patient photographs taken in standing, sitting, supine, and bending positions, with an acetate grid for anatomical calibration.
Results: A total of 876 paired stoma site markings were obtained from 247 volunteers. Exact concordance between virtual and in-person markings was observed in 19.3% of cases. An additional 39.2% of virtual markings were located within 1 cm of the reference point, and 22.1% were within 1-2 cm. The remaining 19.4% deviated by more than 2 cm from the in-person marking. Overall, 80.6% of virtual markings fell within 2 cm of the in-person reference, demonstrating a high level of spatial concordance between the two methods.
Conclusions: A standardized virtual stoma site marking protocol demonstrated high concordance with in-person assessment. This telemedicine-based strategy may be a feasible alternative in settings lacking colorectal specialists and could help optimize perioperative stoma care. The main limitations are inclusion of healthy volunteers rather than surgical patients. Real-world application and clinical outcome impact remain to be validated.
{"title":"Preoperative virtual stoma site marking in colorectal surgery: a pilot study exploring a telemedicine-based solution for limited-access settings.","authors":"E Özoran, T Tüfekçi, T Aksan, E Eren, S N Karahan, A B Eden, I H Özata, D S Uymaz, A Rencüzoğulları, E Balık","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03235-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03235-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative stoma site marking by a wound, ostomy, and continence nurse (WOCN) or colorectal surgeons significantly reduces stoma-related complications. Limited access to WOCNs or colorectal surgeons, especially in rural or emergency settings, remains a barrier to optimal care. This study evaluated the feasibility and spatial accuracy of a novel telemedicine-based protocol for stoma site marking before colorectal surgery in settings with limited specialist access. The primary outcome was the spatial distance between the in-person and virtual markings. Accuracy was classified as exact same point, within < 1 cm, 1-2 cm, or > 2 cm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational pilot study was planned in a tertiary academic medical center. Healthy adult volunteers with no prior abdominal surgery were enrolled in the study. Each participant underwent two independent stoma markings: one by an in-person WOCN and another by a different WOCN using standardized patient photographs taken in standing, sitting, supine, and bending positions, with an acetate grid for anatomical calibration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 876 paired stoma site markings were obtained from 247 volunteers. Exact concordance between virtual and in-person markings was observed in 19.3% of cases. An additional 39.2% of virtual markings were located within 1 cm of the reference point, and 22.1% were within 1-2 cm. The remaining 19.4% deviated by more than 2 cm from the in-person marking. Overall, 80.6% of virtual markings fell within 2 cm of the in-person reference, demonstrating a high level of spatial concordance between the two methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A standardized virtual stoma site marking protocol demonstrated high concordance with in-person assessment. This telemedicine-based strategy may be a feasible alternative in settings lacking colorectal specialists and could help optimize perioperative stoma care. The main limitations are inclusion of healthy volunteers rather than surgical patients. Real-world application and clinical outcome impact remain to be validated.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12748296/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145850852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-27DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03267-4
Y Xia, H Lu, L Qiu, Y Ding, S Wan, Y Fan, B Zou
Objective: This study compares the clinical benefits of double-tube end ileostomy versus traditional end ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 65 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery with preventive ileostomy between March 2022 and December 2024 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. Among these, 47 patients received traditional ileostomy, while 18 patients underwent double-tube ileostomy. The clinical characteristics and follow-up outcomes of the two groups were compared.
Results: Both groups showed no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative bowel function recovery, or complication rates (P > 0.05). However, the double-tube ileostomy group had superior outcomes: average stoma creation time was 25.39 ± 2.85 min, postoperative hospital stays averaged 8.89 ± 2.30 days, and total hospitalization costs were 57,796.50 ± 5306.30 RMB, all significantly lower than in the traditional ileostomy group (P < 0.01). Complications were fewer in the double-tube group, with only one case of type A anastomotic leakage (5.56%) and no long-term complications following successful tube removal. By contrast, the traditional group had 4 cases of leakage (8.51%), and 16 patients experienced long-term complications, with only 40 (85.11%) achieving successful stoma closures. Furthermore, patients in the traditional group reported higher SCL-90 scores for somatization and sleep and eating problems (P < 0.05), indicating significant differences between the groups.
Conclusion: Double-tube end ileostomy offers a safe and effective alternative to traditional methods, with shorter operative times, fewer secondary surgeries, and reduced physiological, psychological, and financial burdens on patients.
{"title":"Double-tube end ileostomy: an alternative to classical defunctioning stoma in rectal surgery.","authors":"Y Xia, H Lu, L Qiu, Y Ding, S Wan, Y Fan, B Zou","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03267-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03267-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compares the clinical benefits of double-tube end ileostomy versus traditional end ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 65 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery with preventive ileostomy between March 2022 and December 2024 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. Among these, 47 patients received traditional ileostomy, while 18 patients underwent double-tube ileostomy. The clinical characteristics and follow-up outcomes of the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative bowel function recovery, or complication rates (P > 0.05). However, the double-tube ileostomy group had superior outcomes: average stoma creation time was 25.39 ± 2.85 min, postoperative hospital stays averaged 8.89 ± 2.30 days, and total hospitalization costs were 57,796.50 ± 5306.30 RMB, all significantly lower than in the traditional ileostomy group (P < 0.01). Complications were fewer in the double-tube group, with only one case of type A anastomotic leakage (5.56%) and no long-term complications following successful tube removal. By contrast, the traditional group had 4 cases of leakage (8.51%), and 16 patients experienced long-term complications, with only 40 (85.11%) achieving successful stoma closures. Furthermore, patients in the traditional group reported higher SCL-90 scores for somatization and sleep and eating problems (P < 0.05), indicating significant differences between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Double-tube end ileostomy offers a safe and effective alternative to traditional methods, with shorter operative times, fewer secondary surgeries, and reduced physiological, psychological, and financial burdens on patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12855385/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145846993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-27DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03259-4
A Srinivasan, K M Yi, D Sharma, S K Mantoo
Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols and multimodal prehabilitation are interventions used to improve outcomes after surgery. However, their integration is not well studied and is a subject of ongoing debate. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal prehabilitation within ERAS for elderly patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.
Methods: Studies that used prehabilitation modalities, such as exercise, nutrition, psychology, and spirituality, compared with two control groups-ERAS alone or ERAS with postoperative rehabilitation-were systematically reviewed and reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed on outcomes such as length of stay (LOS), 6-min walk test (6MWT), postoperative complications, and quality of Life (QOL) using a random effects model.
Results: Six studies with low risk of bias and good quality were selected. These included 547 patients with an age range of 65-78 years in the intervention group (n = 277) and of 66-82 years in the control group (n = 270). All studies exclusively included patients with colorectal cancer. Statistically significant difference was observed for 6MWT and MD of 18.3800 m (95% CI 1.5147-35.2453; p = 0.0404) with an I2 statistic of 3.7% (p = 0.3741), indicating low heterogeneity among studies. However, a statistically significant difference was not found for LOS, postoperative complications, or QOL. No difference was found in subgroup analysis for different study designs or control groups.
Conclusion: Although multimodal prehabilitation in ERAS for elderly patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery has limited clinical use, potential remains for targeted and optimized interventions. Further research is needed to consolidate evidence in selected patient populations.
背景:手术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案和多模式康复是用于改善手术后预后的干预措施。然而,它们的整合并没有得到很好的研究,并且是一个正在进行辩论的主题。本研究的目的是评估era内多模式预适应对接受择期结直肠手术的老年患者的有效性。方法:采用运动、营养、心理和精神等康复方式的研究,与两个对照组(ERAS单独或ERAS合并术后康复)进行比较,并根据PRISMA指南进行系统回顾和报告。采用随机效应模型对住院时间(LOS)、6分钟步行测试(6MWT)、术后并发症和生活质量(QOL)等结果进行meta分析。结果:6项偏倚风险低、质量好的研究入选。其中干预组547例,年龄在65-78岁之间(n = 277),对照组66-82岁之间(n = 270)。所有的研究都只包括结直肠癌患者。6MWT与MD 18.3800 m差异有统计学意义(95% CI 1.5147 ~ 35.2453; p = 0.0404), I2统计量为3.7% (p = 0.3741),研究间异质性较低。然而,在LOS、术后并发症或生活质量方面没有发现统计学上的显著差异。不同研究设计或对照组的亚组分析没有发现差异。结论:尽管ERAS多模式预适应在择期结直肠手术老年患者中的临床应用有限,但仍有潜力进行有针对性的优化干预。需要进一步的研究来巩固选定患者群体的证据。
{"title":"Integrating multimodal prehabilitation into enhanced recovery after surgery programs (MPhERAS) for elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.","authors":"A Srinivasan, K M Yi, D Sharma, S K Mantoo","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03259-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03259-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols and multimodal prehabilitation are interventions used to improve outcomes after surgery. However, their integration is not well studied and is a subject of ongoing debate. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal prehabilitation within ERAS for elderly patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies that used prehabilitation modalities, such as exercise, nutrition, psychology, and spirituality, compared with two control groups-ERAS alone or ERAS with postoperative rehabilitation-were systematically reviewed and reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed on outcomes such as length of stay (LOS), 6-min walk test (6MWT), postoperative complications, and quality of Life (QOL) using a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies with low risk of bias and good quality were selected. These included 547 patients with an age range of 65-78 years in the intervention group (n = 277) and of 66-82 years in the control group (n = 270). All studies exclusively included patients with colorectal cancer. Statistically significant difference was observed for 6MWT and MD of 18.3800 m (95% CI 1.5147-35.2453; p = 0.0404) with an I<sup>2</sup> statistic of 3.7% (p = 0.3741), indicating low heterogeneity among studies. However, a statistically significant difference was not found for LOS, postoperative complications, or QOL. No difference was found in subgroup analysis for different study designs or control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although multimodal prehabilitation in ERAS for elderly patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery has limited clinical use, potential remains for targeted and optimized interventions. Further research is needed to consolidate evidence in selected patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12855354/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145847001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains a major complication after rectal cancer surgery. Although various techniques have been proposed to reduce its incidence, the effectiveness of transanal tube (TA) placement remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate whether combining indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography with TA placement reduces the risk of AL after rectal cancer surgery.
Methods: A retrospective analysis, including patients who underwent rectal resection with primary anastomosis for rectal cancer, was performed. In all cases, anastomotic perfusion was assessed intraoperatively using ICG fluorescence angiography. Patients were categorized into two groups on the basis of postoperative TA placement: TA group and non-TA group. The primary outcome was the incidence of AL. Multivariate logistic regression and subgroup analyses based on tumor location were performed.
Results: The TA group demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of AL compared with the control group (5% versus 18%, p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis identified male sex as a risk factor and TA placement as a protective factor for AL. Subgroup analysis revealed that TA placement was particularly effective in patients with middle rectal cancer.
Conclusions: The placement of a TA may offer additional benefit in reducing the risk of AL after rectal cancer surgery when adequate perfusion is confirmed using ICG fluorescence imaging, particularly in cases of middle rectal cancer.
背景:吻合口瘘(AL)仍然是直肠癌术后的主要并发症。虽然已经提出了各种技术来减少其发生率,但经肛门管(TA)放置的有效性仍然存在争议。本研究旨在评估吲哚菁绿(ICG)荧光血管造影联合TA放置是否能降低直肠癌手术后AL的风险。方法:回顾性分析直肠癌行直肠切除术并一期吻合的患者。在所有病例中,术中使用ICG荧光血管造影评估吻合口灌注。根据术后TA放置情况将患者分为两组:TA组和非TA组。主要结果为AL的发生率。进行多因素logistic回归和基于肿瘤位置的亚组分析。结果:与对照组相比,TA组AL发生率明显降低(5% vs 18%, p = 0.02)。多因素分析表明,男性是AL的危险因素,而TA的放置是AL的保护因素。亚组分析显示,TA的放置对中直肠癌患者特别有效。结论:当ICG荧光成像证实灌注充足时,放置TA可能对降低直肠癌术后AL的风险有额外的好处,特别是在中直肠癌的情况下。
{"title":"Role of transanal tube placement in preventing anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery with sufficient perfusion confirmed by indocyanine green fluorescence imaging.","authors":"Koichiro Okada, Gaku Ohira, Ryota Miura, Toru Tochigi, Tetsuro Maruyama, Atsushi Hirata, Michihiro Maruyama, Hisahiro Matsubara","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03255-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03255-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains a major complication after rectal cancer surgery. Although various techniques have been proposed to reduce its incidence, the effectiveness of transanal tube (TA) placement remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate whether combining indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography with TA placement reduces the risk of AL after rectal cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis, including patients who underwent rectal resection with primary anastomosis for rectal cancer, was performed. In all cases, anastomotic perfusion was assessed intraoperatively using ICG fluorescence angiography. Patients were categorized into two groups on the basis of postoperative TA placement: TA group and non-TA group. The primary outcome was the incidence of AL. Multivariate logistic regression and subgroup analyses based on tumor location were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TA group demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of AL compared with the control group (5% versus 18%, p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis identified male sex as a risk factor and TA placement as a protective factor for AL. Subgroup analysis revealed that TA placement was particularly effective in patients with middle rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The placement of a TA may offer additional benefit in reducing the risk of AL after rectal cancer surgery when adequate perfusion is confirmed using ICG fluorescence imaging, particularly in cases of middle rectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12799619/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145829026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03258-5
M Ishii, A Hamabe, K Okita, T Nishidate, K Okuya, E Akizuki, A Noda, M Miyo, R Miura, M Toyota, K Okamoto, I Takemasa
Introduction: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication after rectal cancer resection, often mitigated by diverting loop ileostomy. However, outlet obstruction remains a significant concern, potentially prolonging hospitalization and requiring reintervention. While surgical risk factors have been explored, patient-specific anatomical factors are less well understood. This study aimed to identify patient-related risk factors for outlet obstruction and evaluate a preventive surgical modification in high-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic rectal cancer surgeries.
Methods: This retrospective study included 318 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic rectal resection with a diverting loop ileostomy. Risk factors were assessed in a control cohort (April 2015-February 2020), followed by a modified ileostomy technique in a validation cohort (March 2020-December 2024).
Results: Increased rectus abdominis muscle thickness (TAM) and larger visceral fat area (AVF) were independent risk factors for outlet obstruction (p = 0.037 and p = 0.041, respectively). Patients with both factors had the highest incidence (52.6%). The modified technique significantly reduced obstruction among high-risk patients (p = 0.003) without increasing parastomal hernia rates.
Conclusions: TAM and AVF are independent predictors of outlet obstruction. A tailored fascial modification reduced obstruction in high-risk patients, supporting the value of preoperative anatomical assessment in surgical planning.
{"title":"Patient-related risk factors for outlet obstruction in diverting loop ileostomy following minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery.","authors":"M Ishii, A Hamabe, K Okita, T Nishidate, K Okuya, E Akizuki, A Noda, M Miyo, R Miura, M Toyota, K Okamoto, I Takemasa","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03258-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03258-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication after rectal cancer resection, often mitigated by diverting loop ileostomy. However, outlet obstruction remains a significant concern, potentially prolonging hospitalization and requiring reintervention. While surgical risk factors have been explored, patient-specific anatomical factors are less well understood. This study aimed to identify patient-related risk factors for outlet obstruction and evaluate a preventive surgical modification in high-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic rectal cancer surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 318 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic rectal resection with a diverting loop ileostomy. Risk factors were assessed in a control cohort (April 2015-February 2020), followed by a modified ileostomy technique in a validation cohort (March 2020-December 2024).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increased rectus abdominis muscle thickness (TAM) and larger visceral fat area (AVF) were independent risk factors for outlet obstruction (p = 0.037 and p = 0.041, respectively). Patients with both factors had the highest incidence (52.6%). The modified technique significantly reduced obstruction among high-risk patients (p = 0.003) without increasing parastomal hernia rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAM and AVF are independent predictors of outlet obstruction. A tailored fascial modification reduced obstruction in high-risk patients, supporting the value of preoperative anatomical assessment in surgical planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12819507/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145822150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background and aims: Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) is a recognized limitation of colorectal ESD (C-ESD) associated with morbidity, additional costs, and prolonged admission. Reliable closure of C-ESD defects can decrease the incidence of PEECS. We introduce a novel mucomuscular closure technique that involves direct closure of the muscularis propria using through-the-scope clips (TTSC). We evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the modified closure technique in prevention of post-C-ESD PEECS.
Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of consecutive C-ESDs at a single tertiary center between January 2017 and October 2023. Patients who underwent C-ESD with mucomuscular closure or conventional closure with TTSC were enrolled. The primary outcome was the incidence and clinical outcome of PEECS. Secondary outcomes were rates of complete defect closure and severe adverse events (SAEs).
Results: A total of 764 patients were included in this study. The incidence of PEECS was significantly lower in the mucomuscular closure group versus conventional closure group (2.5% versus 15.0%, P < 0.001). No SAEs occurred in mucomuscular closure group, whereas two patients had delayed perforation, and two had delayed bleeding in the conventional closure group. In mucomuscular closure group, there was no difference in PEECS occurrence between complete closure (5/218, 2.3%) and partial closure (3/105, 2.9%). No TTSC-related perforation occurred in the process of defect closure.
Conclusions: Mucomuscular closure with TTSC in C-ESDs is effective in preventing PEECS and other postoperative complications.
背景和目的:内镜下粘膜下剥离(ESD)后电凝综合征(PEECS)是公认的结肠直肠ESD (C-ESD)的局限性,与发病率、额外费用和住院时间延长有关。可靠的C-ESD缺损闭合可降低PEECS的发生率。我们介绍了一种新的肌肌闭合技术,该技术涉及使用贯穿镜夹(TTSC)直接闭合固有肌层。我们评估改良缝合技术预防c - esd后PEECS的可行性和有效性。方法:我们于2017年1月至2023年10月在一个三级中心进行了一项连续c - esd的前瞻性队列研究。接受C-ESD联合肌肉闭合或常规TTSC闭合的患者被纳入研究。主要观察指标为PEECS的发生率和临床结果。次要结果是完全缺陷闭合率和严重不良事件(SAEs)。结果:本研究共纳入764例患者。与常规闭合组相比,肌肌闭合组PEECS发生率明显降低(2.5% vs 15.0%), P结论:TTSC肌肌闭合可有效预防C-ESDs的PEECS及其他术后并发症。
{"title":"Safety outcomes of mucomuscular closure versus conventional clip closure in ESD of large (> 15 mm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs).","authors":"T-Y Chen, L-F Wu, X-Y Xu, Y-B Liu, Y-F Zhang, W-F Chen, Q-L Li, J-W Hu, J-X Xu, J Cheng, K-Q Zhou, P-H Zhou, Y-Q Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03261-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03261-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) is a recognized limitation of colorectal ESD (C-ESD) associated with morbidity, additional costs, and prolonged admission. Reliable closure of C-ESD defects can decrease the incidence of PEECS. We introduce a novel mucomuscular closure technique that involves direct closure of the muscularis propria using through-the-scope clips (TTSC). We evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the modified closure technique in prevention of post-C-ESD PEECS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study of consecutive C-ESDs at a single tertiary center between January 2017 and October 2023. Patients who underwent C-ESD with mucomuscular closure or conventional closure with TTSC were enrolled. The primary outcome was the incidence and clinical outcome of PEECS. Secondary outcomes were rates of complete defect closure and severe adverse events (SAEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 764 patients were included in this study. The incidence of PEECS was significantly lower in the mucomuscular closure group versus conventional closure group (2.5% versus 15.0%, P < 0.001). No SAEs occurred in mucomuscular closure group, whereas two patients had delayed perforation, and two had delayed bleeding in the conventional closure group. In mucomuscular closure group, there was no difference in PEECS occurrence between complete closure (5/218, 2.3%) and partial closure (3/105, 2.9%). No TTSC-related perforation occurred in the process of defect closure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mucomuscular closure with TTSC in C-ESDs is effective in preventing PEECS and other postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12819494/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145822152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}