Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology最新文献

Objective:  The aim of this study was to examine a method for measuring femoral trochlear morphology in dogs using ultrasonography, and survey femoral trochlear morphology in skeletally normal dogs.

Study design:  To examine the validity of ultrasonography, three raters measured the sulcus angle (SA; the angle between the medial and lateral facets) five times in five skeletally normal dogs. Intra- and interrater reliabilities were then calculated. We also calculated the correlation coefficient between SAs measured using ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Then, we surveyed the femoral trochlear morphology in skeletally normal dogs using ultrasonography.

Results:  The intra- and interrater reliability for SAs measured using ultrasonography was good, and the correlation coefficient between SAs measured using ultrasonography and CT, or MRI, was strong. In skeletally normal dogs, the SAs for osseous contours decreased until 6 months of age. However, the SAs for cartilaginous contours did not change during the growth period.

Conclusion:  The ultrasonographic measurement method is reliable for the evaluation of femoral trochlear morphology in dogs. The contour of the articular cartilage surface of the femoral trochlea is already determined early in life, and ossification of the articular cartilage of the femoral trochlea proceeds until 6 months of age. The results of this study will provide crucial information for the evaluation of femoral trochlear morphology in dogs.

Objective:  The aim of this study was to determine the influence of time between the beginning of clinical signs, presentation and decompression, and combinations of several factors on the outcome and recovery of dogs undergoing surgery for thoracolumbar intervertebral disk extrusion (IVDE).

Study design:  In all, 433 client-owned dogs treated for IVDE between 2016 and 2020 were reviewed for signalment, neurological grade, rate of onset, duration of clinical signs, and surgical variables. Time from presentation to surgery was divided into three categories: S1 (0-12 hours), S2 (12-24 hours), and S3 (>24 hours). These variables were investigated to determine their influence on the return of pain sensation, urinary continence, ambulation and overall outcome.

Results:  A significant association was found between an acute onset of clinical signs, worse neurological grade at presentation and poorer outcomes. There was a significant difference between S1, S2, and S3 in neurological grade at presentation (p < 0.001) and at discharge (p < 0.001); however, the latter was no longer significant when adjusted for the grade at presentation (p = 1,000). Disk fenestration was associated with a faster return to ambulation (p = 0.033). Duration of clinical signs and time of surgery did not correlate with the time to recovery and return of pain sensation, urinary continence, or ambulation.

Conclusion:  Dogs presented with severe neurological status and/or rapid onset of clinical signs were operated on more promptly, but their outcomes were also poorer. There was no significant evidence for a better outcome when surgery was not delayed.

Objective:  The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of client recollection of their dogs' preconsultation status using clinical metrology instruments such as the Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs (LOAD) and Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI) questionnaires in dogs presenting to a referral orthopaedic clinic.

Study design:  This is a longitudinal prospective cohort study of client-owned dogs presenting for investigations of lameness (n = 217). LOAD and CBPI questionnaires were completed by the owners at the first consultation (T0). Owners were contacted at 2 (T1), 6 (T2), and 12 (T3) months and asked to recall their dogs' T0 status by completing another LOAD and CBPI questionnaire. The agreement between the T0 and recalled LOAD and CBPI scores was determined using the two-way mixed effects intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to determine the difference between scores.

Results:  For the LOAD scores, there was moderate agreement between T0 and T1 (ICC: 0.64) and T0 and T2 (ICC: 0.53) scores and poor agreement between T0 and T3 (ICC: 0.496). For the CBPI Pain Severity Scores, there was poor agreement between T0 and all three subsequent time points (ICC < 0.5). For the CBPI Pain Interference Scores, there was moderate agreement between T0 and T1 (ICC: 0.57) and T2 (ICC: 0.56) scores and poor agreement between T0 and T3 (ICC: 0.43).

Conclusion:  The LOAD and CBPI questionnaires are subject to recall bias. Studies reporting retrospectively acquired CMI data should be interpreted with caution.