Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation最新文献

Microphysiological systems (MPS) are gaining broader application in the pharmaceutical industry but have primarily been leveraged in early discovery toxicology and pharmacology studies with small molecules. The adoption of MPS offers a promising avenue to reduce animal use, improve in-vitro-to-in-vivo translation of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and toxicity correlation, and provide mechanistic understanding of model species suitability. While MPS have demonstrated utility in these areas with small molecules and biologics, MPS models in cell therapy development have not been fully explored, let alone validated. Distinguishing features of MPS, including long-term viability and physiologically relevant expression of functional enzymes, receptors, and pharmacological targets make them attractive tools for nonclinical characterization. However, there is currently limited published evidence of MPS being utilized to study the disposition, metabolism, pharmacology, and toxicity profiles of cell therapies. This review provides an industry perspective on the nonclinical application of MPS on cell therapies, first with a focus on oncology applications followed by examples in regenerative medicine.

This article explores the potential of principles established in translational medicine for the use of bio-markers to advance the validation of alternatives to animal testing in preclinical safety assessment. It examines especially how such principles can enhance the predictive power, mechanistic under-standing, and human relevance of new approach methodologies (NAMs). Key concepts from translational medicine, such as fit-for-purpose validation, evidence-based approaches, and inte-grated testing strategies, are already being applied to the development and validation of NAMs. The article discusses challenges in implementing biomarker-based approaches, including standardi-zation, demonstration of relevance, regulatory acceptance, and addressing biological complexity. It also highlights opportunities for advancement through collaborative efforts, technological inno-vations, and regulatory evolution. Case studies demonstrate successful applications of biomarkers in preclinical safety, while future perspectives explore emerging trends like multi-omics integration, microphysiological systems, and artificial intelligence. The article emphasizes the potential of bio-markers and translational science approaches in creating more predictive, efficient, and ethical preclinical safety assessment paradigms in the use of NAMs. Use of biomarkers can enable the mechanistic validation of human-relevant models and provide a means to relate changes in NAMs to animal or clinical study results. By leveraging these tools, the field can work towards reducing reliance on animal testing while improving the accuracy and human relevance of safety predictions.

Effective repair of spinal cord injury sites remains a major clinical challenge. One promising strategy is the implantation of multifunctional bioscaffolds to enhance nerve fiber growth, guide regener­ating tissue, and modulate scarring/inflammation processes. Given their multifunctional nature, such implants require testing in models which replicate the complex neuropathological responses of spinal injury sites. This is often achieved using live, adult animal models of spinal injury. However, these have substantial drawbacks for developmental testing, including the requirement for large numbers of animals, costly infrastructure, high levels of expertise, and complex ethical processes. As an alternative, we show that organotypic spinal cord slices can be derived from the E14 chick embryo and cultured with high viability for at least 24 days, with major neural cell types detected. A transecting injury could be reproducibly introduced into the slices and characteristic neuro­pathological responses similar to those in adult spinal cord injury observed at the lesion margin. This included aligned astrocyte morphologies and upregulation of glial fibrillary acidic protein in astrocytes, microglial infiltration into the injury cavity, and limited nerve fiber outgrowth. Bioimplan­tation of a clinical grade scaffold biomaterial was able to modulate these responses, disrupting the astrocyte barrier, enhancing nerve fiber growth, and supporting immune cell invasion. Chick embryos are inexpensive and simple, requiring facile methods to generate the neurotrauma model. Our data show the chick embryo spinal cord slice system could be a replacement spinal injury model for laboratories developing new tissue engineering solutions.

Animal models have historically been poor preclinical predictors of gastrointestinal (GI) directed therapeutic efficacy and drug-induced GI toxicity. Human stem and primary cell-derived culture systems are a major focus of efforts to create biologically relevant models that enhance preclinical predictive value of intestinal efficacy and toxicity. The inherent variability in stem cell-based cultures makes development of useful models a challenge; the stochastic nature of stem cell differentiation interferes with the ability to build and validate reproducible assays that query drug responses and pharmacokinetics. In this study, we aimed to characterize and reduce sources of variability in a complex stem cell-derived intestinal epithelium model, termed RepliGut® Planar, across cells from multiple human donors, cell lots, and passage numbers. Assessment criteria included barrier for­mation and integrity, gene expression, and cytokine responses. Gene expression and culture metric analyses revealed that controlling cell passage number reduces variability and maximizes physi­ological relevance of the model. In a case study where passage number was optimized, distinct cytokine responses were observed among four human donors, indicating that biological variability can be detected in cell cultures originating from diverse human sources. These findings highlight key considerations for designing assays that can be applied to additional primary cell-derived systems, as well as establish utility of the RepliGut® Planar platform for robust development of human-pre­dictive drug-response assays.

Many laboratory procedures generate data on properties of chemicals, but they cannot be equated with toxicological "test methods". This apparent discrepancy is not limited to in vitro testing, using animal-free new approach methods (NAM), but also applies to animal-based testing approaches. Here, we give a brief overview of the differences between data generation and the setup or use of a complete test method. While there is excellent literature available on this topic for specialists (GIVIMP guidance; ToxTemp overview), a brief overview and easily-accessible entry point may be useful for a broader community. We provide a single figure to summarize all test method elements and processes required in the development (setup and adaptation) of a test method. The exposure scheme, the endpoint, and the test system are briefly outlined as fundamental elements of any test method. A rationale is provided, why they are not sufficient. We then explain the importance and role of purpose definition (including some information on what is modelled) and the prediction model, aka data interpretation procedure, which depends on the purpose definition, as further essential elements. This connection exemplifies that all fundamental elements are interdependent, and none can be omitted. Finally, discussion is provided on validation as a measure to provide confidence in the reliability, performance, and relevance of a test method. In this sense, validation may be considered a sixth fundamental element for practical use of test methods.

Since the late 2010s, the idea of phase-out planning for animal experimentation (PPAE) has come to the foreground of political debates, but central notions and arguments are understood differently by different participants and stand in need of clarification. This article draws on public communications on ten political projects related to PPAE to propose a philosophical explication of PPAE and to artic­ulate the proponents’ central moral argument. According to the argument, the phase-out of animal experimentation is morally desirable, and planned interventions are both necessary and sufficient to achieve it. The normative and descriptive premises of the argument are stated and discussed, flagging questions that need answering for a more thorough assessment of the argument. This results in a series of seven action points for researchers and stakeholders of PPAE. The overall goal is to enable an open and productive discussion about PPAE in public, political, and academic settings.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are chemicals with important applications; they are persistent in the environment and may pose human health hazards. Regulatory agencies are con­sidering restrictions and bans of PFAS; however, little data exists for informed decisions. Several prioritization strategies were proposed for evaluation of potential hazards of PFAS. Structure-based grouping could expedite the selection of PFAS for testing; still, the hypothesis that structure-effect relationships exist for PFAS requires confirmation. We tested 26 structurally diverse PFAS from 8 groups using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocytes and cardiomyocytes, and tested concentration-response effects on cell function and gene expression. Few phenotypic effects were observed in hepatocytes, but negative chronotropy was observed in cardiomyocytes for 8 PFAS. Substance- and cell type-dependent transcriptomic changes were more prominent but lacked substantial group-specific effects. In hepatocytes, we found upregulation of stress-related and extracellular matrix organization pathways, and down-regulation of fat metabolism. In car­diomyocytes, contractility-related pathways were most affected. We derived phenotypic and transcriptomic points of departure and compared them to predicted PFAS exposures. Conservative estimates for bioactivity and exposure were used to derive a bioactivity-to-exposure ratio (BER) for each PFAS; 23 of 26 PFAS had BER > 1. Overall, these data suggest that structure-based PFAS grouping may not be sufficient to predict their biological effects. Testing of individual PFAS may be needed for scientifically-supported decision-making. Our proposed strategy of using two human cell types and considering phenotypic and transcriptomic effects, combined with dose-response analysis and calculation of BER, may be used for PFAS prioritization.

Currently there are two OECD-adopted defined approaches (DA) for eye hazard identification of non-surfactant liquids (OECD TG 467). The current study aimed to develop a DA for eye hazard identification of solid chemicals according to the three UN GHS categories (Cat.1, Cat. 2, No Cat.): the DAS. The DAS combines two test methods described in OECD TG 437 and TG 492. The DAS was developed based on in-depth statistical analysis of a database on solids containing in vitro and historically curated in vivo Draize eye test data. The performance of the DAS was assessed by comparing the predictions with the classification based on in vivo Draize eye test data, on the one hand, and with the performance criteria established by the OECD expert group, on the other hand. In a first tier of the DAS, the SkinEthic™ HCE EIT method (TG 492) is used to distinguish No Cat. from classified substances. For classified substances, the BCOP LLBO method (TG 437) is used to identify Cat. 1, and the remaining solids are predicted Cat. 2. In summary, 77.4% Cat. 1 (N=31), 52.3% Cat. 2 (N=18), and 70.0% of No Cat. (N=60) solids were correctly identified compared to the classification based on the Draize eye test. The percentage of correct predictions met the minimum OECD performance values of 75% Cat. 1, 50% Cat. 2, and 70% No Cat., and the percentage of mispredictions was below the established maximum values. Therefore, inclusion of the DAS in OECD TG 467 has been achieved.

The Human Exposome Project aims to revolutionize our understanding of how environmental exposures affect human health by systematically cataloging and analyzing the myriad exposures individuals encounter throughout their lives. This initiative draws a parallel with the Human Genome Project, expanding the focus from genetic factors to the dynamic and complex nature of environ-mental interactions. The project leverages advanced methodologies such as omics technologies, biomonitoring, microphysiological systems (MPS), and artificial intelligence (AI), forming the foun-dation of exposome intelligence (EI) to integrate and interpret vast datasets. Key objectives include identifying exposure-disease links, prioritizing hazardous chemicals, enhancing public health and regulatory policies, and reducing reliance on animal testing. The Implementation Moonshot Project for Alternative Chemical Testing (IMPACT), spearheaded by the Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), is a new element in this endeavor, driving the creation of a public-private part-nership toward a Human Exposome Project with a stakeholder forum in 2025. Establishing robust infrastructure, fostering interdisciplinary collaborations, and ensuring quality assurance through sys-tematic reviews and evidence-based frameworks are crucial for the project's success. The expected outcomes promise transformative advancements in precision public health, disease prevention, and a more ethical approach to toxicology. This paper outlines the strategic imperatives, challenges, and opportunities that lie ahead, calling on stakeholders to support and participate in this landmark initiative for a healthier, more sustainable future.