BMC Medical Education最新文献

Background: Sex- and gender-based medicine (SGBM) addresses differences between males/men and females/women with regard to clinical manifestation, diagnostics, treatment and outcomes of diseases. The implementation of SGBM in the medical curriculum varies, and data on the knowledge of lecturers and students about SGBM is scarce. This study aims to evaluate the perceived importance and knowledge of SGBM among lecturers and students.

Methods: This cross-sectional observational survey was conducted using a questionnaire, including ranked with a Likert Scale. Statistical analysis was performed with the Chi-squared test. All lecturers and students at the Bern University Medical School in Switzerland were invited to voluntarily participate.

Results: 114 (34.1%) lecturers and 903 (41.4%) students participated in the survey. Women perceived education of SGBM to be of greater importance than men in lecturer and student subgroups respectively (lecturers women vs. men median 6.0 vs. 5.0, P = 0.011; students 6.0 vs. 5.0, P < 0.001). No significant differences between genders of self-reported knowledge of SGBM were found (lecturers women vs. men median 4.0 vs. 4.0, P = 0.624; students 3.0 vs. 4.0, P = 0.562). There were significant differences in the perception of the SGBM being actively addressed in lectures between lecturers and students (59.4% vs. 28.8%, P < 0.001) and whether the curriculum should include SGBM (strongly agree 28.9% vs. 51.3%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Women lecturers and students consider teaching of SGBM during medical studies to be more important than men. Lecturers perceived the amount of SGBM already included in the lectures to be greater compared to students.

Background: Digital literacy influences academic behaviors, especially in medical education, where students encounter considerable academic challenges. However, the effects of this phenomenon on academic self-efficacy and procrastination remain inadequately understood.

Objectives: This research explores the relationships between digital literacy and academic self-efficacy, emphasizing the mediating role of academic procrastination and its various dimensions among medical students.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted from seven medical colleges from October to December 2023. The research employed meticulously validated measurement tools encompassing a digital literacy scale, academic self-efficacy scale, and academic procrastination scale and collected data on 659 medical students. Descriptive statistics and inferential testing (mediation analysis) were performed to investigate the direct and indirect relationships of the study variables.

Results: The empirical results confirmed that digital literacy positively influenced academic self-efficacy and negatively correlated with academic procrastination. Among the five dimensions of procrastination assessed, self-efficacy emerged as the most potent mediator, significantly reducing procrastination and enhancing academic self-efficacy, followed by affective procrastination, time management, task avoidance, and behavioral procrastination.

Conclusion: The findings underscore the critical role of digital literacy in fostering academic self-efficacy and reducing procrastination among medical students. Educators can develop more effective interventions to support medical students in their academic journey by targeting specific dimensions of procrastination, particularly self-efficacy-related procrastination. Future research should consider longitudinal studies to confirm causality and explore these dynamics in diverse educational settings.

Background: This in vitro study investigated whether full-guided (FG) or half-guided (HG) implant placement is more suitable for beginners and to what extent the use of the coDiagnostiX (CDX) (10.5, Straumann Group, Basel, Switzerland) implant planning software proves useful in teaching.

Methods: Twenty students planned implant positions with CDX which were then placed in a model using printed drill templates in the sense of FG implantation (group 1) and HG implantation (group 2). The implant positions could be compared with those of the reference model, and deviations could be determined. The results were tested for significance using the t-test for independent samples for groups 1 and 2. A total of 32 students subsequently completed a questionnaire about the software. Cronbach's α was also calculated to check the reliability of the questions for the individual subject areas.

Results: In both groups the greatest deviation occurred along the y-axis in the vestibular direction. It measured 1.390 mm in group 1 and 1.570 mm in group 2. Comparing both groups, there were significant deviations along the y-axis (p = .013), along the z-axis (p = .049), and in the total deviation (p = .031). The questionnaire was evaluated in design, with 95% positive answers. In contrast, the evaluation of the area of time and effort resulted in only 55% positive responses. Overall, experience with the software was rated as positive by 74%.

Conclusions: Group 1 achieved more accurate results, especially along the y-axis in the vestibular direction. In both groups, the implants were placed too deep. The questionnaire indicated a software with high usability and is therefore very suitable for teaching. If clinically feasible, beginners should prefer full-guided implant placement.

Background: Clinical leadership competencies for effective teamwork differ between Western cultures, where an independent self-construal prevails, and Japanese society, where the self-construal is rooted in interdependence. Although 27 out of 82 Japanese medical schools have 'leadership' as an educational outcome, specific competencies are poorly described, hindering the development of contextually-relevant leadership education. This study aimed to identify clinical leadership competencies and articulate the attributes and skills fundamental to leadership as perceived by Japanese physicians.

Methods: The 80 items of the UK clinical leadership competency framework (CLCF) formed the stimulus in a modified Delphi. Participants, comprising 26 Japanese physicians, rated the importance of each item using a 5-point Likert scale with free-text comments regarding the modification of competencies and suggestions for new items. Items were eliminated if the Likert mean was less than 4.0 and if fewer than 70% of participants considered them to be important. Newly described or modified items derived from free-text comments were rated for importance in a second round with reflective thematic analysis of the free-text descriptions.

Results: A CLCF of 84 items, reflective of Japanese clinical leadership, was created by eliminating three items describing tasks rarely involving Japanese physician leaders, revising seven items to emphasize understanding of members, and adding seven items to maximize feelings of team comfort. Seven skills and attributes emerged to construct Japanese clinical leadership from thematic analysis. "Humility" was viewed as a fundamental to leadership. Humility-driven "self-discipline" and "attentive listening", "supporting members" and "guiding members" with humility-based compassion, were essential elements to create "psychological safety" for freedom of expression. Achieving "unity" through emotional integration was identified as the overall goal of leadership.

Conclusions: The reorganized CLCF has embedded more member-centered behaviors that build rapport and comfort for the members than the original CLCF. Modeling the Confucian virtue of humility and building unity by acting with compassion toward members are characteristics of Japanese clinical leadership that reflect an interdependent social context. These findings are a step toward the development of leadership education aligned with a Japanese context.

Background: Tunneled catheters can be inserted for many reasons, and in most centers, and in most centers it is not clear who should insert these catheters. Some anesthesiologists may not have seen first-hand the insertion of a tunneled catheter during their residency, depending on the policies of the institution. YouTube is one of the most commonly used online platforms for accessing medical information. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of YouTube videos, for tunneled central venous catheter (Hickman and tunneled hemodialysis catheters) insertion for education.

Methods: The keywords "Tunneled catheter insertion" and "Tunneled central venous catheter insertion" were searched for on YouTube. The first 100 videos ranked by the YouTube algorithm were analysed. Animation and theoretical content videos, as well as videos that included only a part of the catheter insertion, were excluded. The sources of the videos were categorized as medical doctors or professional organizations. medical device advertisement and hospital. Two authors evaluated all videos via the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, modified DISCERN scores and the Global Quality Scale (GQS).

Results: Twenty-three videos were analysed in the study. The video quality scores were similar across the video sources. The number of views and the number of likes were significantly positively correlated. Furthermore, a significant correlation was found between the JAMA, Modified DISCERN, and GQS scores. Notably, none of the analysed videos achieved full points in all three scoring systems.

Conclusions: Relying on a single criterion, such as the video source or number of likes, is not sufficient to determine a video's quality. Therefore, what is learned from videos needs to be double-checked. These platforms should be used as an additional tool, not as the primary source of education.

Background: Undergraduate medical education and residency training are critical periods for conducting research. Medical diagnoses and therapies are direct results of successful research efforts that have advanced several scientific fields. This review highlights the importance of incorporating scientific research training into the curricula of undergraduate medical education and residency programs.

Methods: We utilized key databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to conduct a narrative review of English-language articles published between 2002 and 2024. Ultimately, we selected 49 studies that examined the attitudes of undergraduate medical students and residents toward research, the common challenges they encounter while participating in research activities, and the strategies that support and encourage their involvement, all in alignment with our study objectives and keywords. In addition, we identified several relevant themes, including the value of research experience in shaping well-rounded medical professionals; the integrity of research practices in residency selection, which addresses concerns such as the arms race and misrepresentation, as well as the balance between quality and quantity; striking a balance between research and clinical training while promoting equity and inclusion; and effective programs and mentorship strategies to enhance research engagement.

Results: Translating the positive attitudes of undergraduate medical students and residents into improved knowledge and practice necessitates the development of structured mentoring programs and advanced training systems. Institutions must provide the necessary tools, guidance, and support to overcome research barriers. This will help establish an environment in undergraduate medical education and residency training that values research, facilitates access to it, and integrates it into the curriculum.

Conclusions: To address the critical shortage of physician-researchers and improve evidence-based medical practice, it is crucial for medical schools to focus on research education and create avenues for student involvement. By tackling research challenges and implementing supportive strategies, these efforts empower the next generation of physician-researchers to embrace research, contribute to medical progress, and uphold the highest standards of patient care.

Background: This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of pediatric healthcare staff towards the therapy for patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). CHD is a major global health concern, posing significant risks to health and life despite advancements in early detection and treatment.

Methods: This web-based cross-sectional study was conducted from May 04, 2023 to August 12, 2023 in the Bengbu area (three counties and one city) for pediatric healthcare staff. Correlations between knowledge, attitude and practice scores were evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis. Factors associated with knowledge, attitude and practice scores were identified by multivariate logistic regression.

Results: A total of 332 valid questionnaires were enrolled, including 258 (77.7%) females, and 161 (48.5%) were pediatrician. The median (25% quartile, 75% quintile) of knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 38 (36, 40) (possible range: 10-49), 28 (27, 31) (possible range: 7-35), and 35 (32, 39) (possible range: 9-45), respectively. Correlation analysis showed that significant positive correlations were found between knowledge and attitude (r = 0.528, P < 0.001), as well as practice (r = 0.399, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, there were also correlations between attitudes and practice (r = 0.528, P < 0.001). Univariate logistic regression showed that treated more than 100 children with congenital heart disease annually (OR = 2.976, 95% CI: 1.405, 6.303, P = 0.004) was independently associated with knowledge. Female (OR = 0.470, 95% CI: 0.277, 0.797, P = 0.005) and with more than 5 years of work experience (OR = 0.507, 95% CI: 0.262, 0.982, P = 0.044) were independently associated with attitude. Female (OR = 0.584, 95% CI: 0.343, 0.994, P = 0.048) and treated more than 100 children with congenital heart disease annually (OR = 3.743, 95% CI: 1.702, 8.232, P = 0.001) were independently associated with practice.

Conclusion: Pediatric healthcare staff had sufficient knowledge, positive attitude and proactive practice towards the therapy for patients with congenital heart disease. To improve clinical practice, prioritize training programs to build knowledge and positive attitudes among healthcare staff, encourage hands-on experience with CHD cases, and promote mentorship by experienced professionals for a collaborative work environment and better care.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the impact of bedside case-based learning on critical thinking and capacity for self-directed learning in a group of midwifery students in China.

Background: Bedside teaching is a well-established educational tool to improve the clinical practice of medical, nursing, and midwifery students. A new pedagogical approach; bedside case-based learning (BCBL) is an interactive teaching approach involving small-group, student-educator discussion to describe the etiology and management of a patient case. This new approach has been gradually integrated into Chinese midwifery education programs to promote clinical problem-solving skills, knowledge application, teamwork, and collaboration.

Design: A quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test group design.

Methods: This study used a quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test group design. A convenience sample of 67 third-year students majoring in midwifery at the university were prospectively enrolled in this study. Pre- and post-BCBL class surveys were conducted using the Self-Rating Scale of Self-Directed Learning (SRSSDL) and the Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version (CTDI-CV) to assess changes in self-learning and critical thinking abilities before and after the intervention.

Results: Following bedside case-based learning, the total scores for self-directed learning capacity and critical thinking increased, although there were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Although there were no statistically significant differences between pre- and post-test results, students' self-assessed scores in self-directed learning and critical thinking improved between pre- and post-test.

Background: Physicians play an important role in management and governance of healthcare systems, yet many lack formal leadership training and skills. Despite leadership training through placements in wards at a graduate level, this should take place early on (undergraduate level), to lay the foundations for future physicians to consider a career choice in leadership positions long before entering practice. The fundamentals of leadership and management should be incorporated in the medical curriculum, with input from experts in the area such that relevant concepts are appropriately adapted with a healthcare context.

Methods: We developed a pilot leadership and management module for undergraduate medical students, drawing from sources such as the UK National Health System and General Medical Council, primary literature, and undergraduate business school curricula. Students in their clinical years (4-6) of an undergraduate, six-year medical degree, were invited to participate in five 2-hour online sessions. Participants completed a questionnaire before and after module completion to assess whether individual perspectives on 22 skills relevant to leadership knowledge, and their self-rated competence in each one, changed following module attendance.

Results: Sixteen medical students participated in the study. Module attendance resulted in mean self-reported competence increase in 18 of the 22 skills, with "inspire others", "public speaking", "coding and billing", "risk management" and "conflict resolution" displaying the largest positive change. Free-text comments provided encouraging feedback regarding the module and its contents, and the teaching method of such skills (case-studies or more applied scenarios, as opposed to taught lectures).

Conclusions: The positive changes in student perceptions and self-reported competence in leadership skills that are not traditionally included in the undergraduate medical curriculum, but are part of the business curriculum, further support the importance of inter-professional learning. Our findings are expected to inform the development of a module that could be incorporated in undergraduate medical curricula as part of future research with larger sample size and objective measures of skill competence.

Background: Academic stress is a prevalent issue affecting students' well-being and academic achievement in today's challenging educational environment. Furthermore, combining digital literacy and self-regulation enhances emotional intelligence, creating a holistic "digitally regulated emotional intelligence" strategy to reduce academic stress effectively. This study emphasizes the significance of developing these abilities in educational settings to prepare students for success in a complex and technology-driven world.

Aim: To assess emotional intelligence and academic stress among healthcare students and investigate the mediating role of students' digital literacy and self-regulation.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to examine correlations and describe quantitative data. Data on two hundred forty students were collected from Fatima College of Health Sciences in the 2023-24 academic year. Pearson's correlation coefficient was applied to assess the associations between variables, and univariate linear regression was employed to investigate the connections between emotional intelligence and pertinent variables. The Hayes Process Model 4 macro was used to study how students' digital literacy and self-regulation mediate the relationship between emotional intelligence and academic stress.

Results: Emotional intelligence, digital literacy, and self-regulation were high. Furthermore, the academic stress level was moderate. The mediation analysis revealed that the direct effect of emotional intelligence on academic stress in the presence of the mediators was significant (t = 3.830, p < 0.001). Hence, digital literacy partially mediated the relationship between emotional intelligence and academic stress. On the other hand, self-regulation had no mediation effect on the relationship above.

Conclusion: The study noted significant connections between study attributes, mainly showing the substantial relationship between emotional intelligence and academic stress. Higher emotional intelligence did not consistently reduce stress levels for moderately stressed students, suggesting that other factors may influence their stress levels. Furthermore, digital literacy mediated between emotional intelligence and academic stress, implying that proficient use of online resources could help reduce stress in students with advanced digital skills. Finally, self-regulation did not act as a mediator in the relationship between emotional intelligence and academic stress.