首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice最新文献

英文 中文
Seed allergy evaluation and outcomes in a pediatric food challenge center 儿童食物挑战中心的种子过敏评估和结果。
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.10.009
Timothy M. Buckey MD, MBE , Alexandra Navard-Keck MD , Jasmyn Atalla MD , Layla Samandi MD , Gita Ram MD , Jonathan M. Spergel MD, PhD , Katie L. Kennedy MD
{"title":"Seed allergy evaluation and outcomes in a pediatric food challenge center","authors":"Timothy M. Buckey MD, MBE , Alexandra Navard-Keck MD , Jasmyn Atalla MD , Layla Samandi MD , Gita Ram MD , Jonathan M. Spergel MD, PhD , Katie L. Kennedy MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.10.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.10.009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"Pages 297-299"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145369199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Treatable Traits of Hymenoptera Venom–Induced Anaphylaxis: A Real-Life–Based Study 膜翅目毒液引起的过敏反应的可治疗特征:一项基于现实生活的研究。
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.10.045
Audrey Kamga MD , Jean Luc Bourrain MD , Pascal Demoly MD, PhD , Luciana Kase Tanno MD, PhD

Background

“Treatable traits” (TT) have been proposed as a new paradigm for asthma but never applied to anaphylaxis. Hymenoptera venom–induced anaphylaxis (HVA) is one of the leading causes of anaphylaxis worldwide.

Objective

Our aim was to propose TT for HVA based on evidence-based data.

Methods

This is a historic-prospective study based on the Hymenoptera venom–induced allergy and hypersensitivity database fed regularly by allergists at the Montpellier University hospital. Patients were classified as having “mild anaphylaxis” (MA), “moderate-severe anaphylaxis” (MSA), or “nonanaphylaxis” (NA), following Ring and Messmer Severity Score, and characteristics have been evaluated for each group. The potential risk factors have been classified as modifiable/controllable (MCRF) and nonmodifiable (NRF), and TT have been proposed from a preventive perspective.

Results

Of overall 602 patients, 54.2% were men, with a mean age of 42.3 years. A total of 218 patients (36.2%) developed MA, 159 (26.4%) MSA, and 213 (35.4%) NA. Age and atopic and cardiovascular diseases were identified as significant NRF. Symptoms appeared within 5 minutes (P < .01) and less than 1 hour in MSA. Skin tests and in vitro ves v5 (P < .0355) were significant and sensitive tools for the diagnosis. Occupational exposure (30%), along with the use of adrenaline, and venom immunotherapy were considered MCRF.

Conclusions

Our results brought the evidence to TT through HVA data and tailored adapted preventive strategies to all severity degrees of HVA. This article based on real-life data is a wake-up call for actions. Step forward implementation of actions among specialists and the general population should be put in place to reduce the morbimortality induced by HVA.
背景:“可治疗特征”(TT)已被提出作为哮喘的新范式,但从未应用于过敏反应。膜翅目毒液引起的过敏反应(HVA)是世界范围内过敏反应的主要原因之一。目的:我们的目的是基于循证数据提出TT治疗HVA。方法:基于蒙彼利埃大学医院过敏症专家定期提供的膜翅目蛇毒致过敏和超敏反应数据库(VAHD)进行历史前瞻性研究。根据Ring和Messmer严重程度评分,将患者分为“轻度过敏反应”(MA)、“中重度过敏反应”(MSA)或“非过敏反应”(NA),并对每组患者的特征进行评估。潜在的危险因素被分为可改变/可控(MCRF)和不可改变(NRF),并从预防的角度提出了可治疗的特征。结果:602例患者中,男性占54.2%,平均年龄42.3岁,其中MA 218例(36.2%),MSA 159例(26.4%),NA 213例(35.4%)。年龄、特应性疾病和心血管疾病被认为是显著的NRF。结论:我们的研究结果通过HVA数据为TT提供了证据,并针对所有严重程度的HVA量身定制了适合的预防策略。这份基于真实数据的手稿为我们的行动敲响了警钟。应在专家和一般人群中采取进一步行动,以减少由HVA引起的发病率和死亡率。
{"title":"Treatable Traits of Hymenoptera Venom–Induced Anaphylaxis: A Real-Life–Based Study","authors":"Audrey Kamga MD ,&nbsp;Jean Luc Bourrain MD ,&nbsp;Pascal Demoly MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Luciana Kase Tanno MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.10.045","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.10.045","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>“Treatable traits” (TT) have been proposed as a new paradigm for asthma but never applied to anaphylaxis. Hymenoptera venom–induced anaphylaxis (HVA) is one of the leading causes of anaphylaxis worldwide.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Our aim was to propose TT for HVA based on evidence-based data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a historic-prospective study based on the Hymenoptera venom–induced allergy and hypersensitivity database fed regularly by allergists at the Montpellier University hospital. Patients were classified as having “mild anaphylaxis” (MA), “moderate-severe anaphylaxis” (MSA), or “nonanaphylaxis” (NA), following Ring and Messmer Severity Score, and characteristics have been evaluated for each group. The potential risk factors have been classified as modifiable/controllable (MCRF) and nonmodifiable (NRF), and TT have been proposed from a preventive perspective.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of overall 602 patients, 54.2% were men, with a mean age of 42.3 years. A total of 218 patients (36.2%) developed MA, 159 (26.4%) MSA, and 213 (35.4%) NA. Age and atopic and cardiovascular diseases were identified as significant NRF. Symptoms appeared within 5 minutes (<em>P</em> &lt; .01) and less than 1 hour in MSA. Skin tests and <em>in vitro</em> ves v5 (<em>P</em> &lt; .0355) were significant and sensitive tools for the diagnosis. Occupational exposure (30%), along with the use of adrenaline, and venom immunotherapy were considered MCRF.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our results brought the evidence to TT through HVA data and tailored adapted preventive strategies to all severity degrees of HVA. This article based on real-life data is a wake-up call for actions. Step forward implementation of actions among specialists and the general population should be put in place to reduce the morbimortality induced by HVA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"Pages 260-273"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145524799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Information for Readers 读者资讯
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2198(25)01167-5
{"title":"Information for Readers","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2213-2198(25)01167-5","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2213-2198(25)01167-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"Page A18"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145903904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Mast Cell Activation Syndromes: Status 2026 肥大细胞激活综合征患者的诊断和治疗:现状2026
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.12.017
{"title":"Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Mast Cell Activation Syndromes: Status 2026","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.12.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.12.017","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"Page 29"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145903908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Longitudinal Associations Between Household Use of “Green” Cleaning Products and Asthma Symptoms 家庭使用“绿色”清洁产品与哮喘症状之间的纵向关联。
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.09.027
Emilie Pacheco Da Silva PhD , Raphaëlle Varraso PhD , Léopold K. Fezeu MD, PhD , Pilar Galan MD, PhD , Serge Hercberg MD, PhD , Mathilde Touvier PhD , Christophe Paris MD, PhD , Nicole Le Moual PhD , Orianne Dumas PhD

Background

The household use of irritant and sprayed cleaning products is an established asthma risk factor, which could motivate consumers to turn to “green” products. However, only 2 cross-sectional studies, with inconsistent results, evaluated the potential respiratory health impacts of “green” products.

Objective

To investigate 2-years effects on asthma of household use of “green” products and irritants/sprays, using longitudinal data from the French NutriNet-Santé cohort.

Methods

The asthma symptom score and household use of “green” products and irritants/sprays were evaluated using standardized questionnaires in 2018 and 2020. The evolution of weekly use (persistent, increased vs no weekly use) was studied in association with (1) the asthma symptom score in 2020; (2) the incidence of asthma symptoms between 2018 and 2020 (incidence vs asymptomatic); and (3) the evolution of asthma symptoms between 2018 and 2020 (improvement, deterioration vs symptomatic stable) by logistic regressions. Models were adjusted for sex, age, smoking status, body mass index, educational level, and use of irritants/sprays (for “green” products).

Results

Our study was based on 30,012 adults (mean age: 49 ± 14 years; 74% women). For irritants/sprays, persistent (40%) and increased (26%) use was associated with asthma symptoms (mean score ratio MSR [95% CI values]: 1.26 [1.18-1.34], and MSR: 1.14 [1.06-1.22], respectively), incidence (odds ratio OR [95% CI values]: 1.30 [1.16-1.45], and OR: 1.07 [0.95-1.20], respectively), and deterioration (OR: 1.48 [1.19-1.85], and OR: 1.28 [1.01-1.64], respectively). For green products, persistent (20%) and increased (12%) use was associated with symptoms in 2020 (MSR: 1.08 [1.01-1.16], and MSR: 1.07 [0.99-1.16], respectively), and associations were suggested with incidence (OR: 1.09 [0.97-1.22], and OR: 1.11 [0.97-1.27], respectively).

Conclusions

Persistent and increased use of irritants/sprays but also of “green” products was associated with deleterious effects on asthma over time.
背景:家庭使用刺激性和喷雾清洁产品是一个确定的哮喘风险因素,这可能促使消费者转向“绿色”产品。然而,只有两项横断面研究评估了“绿色”产品对呼吸系统健康的潜在影响,结果不一致。目的:我们研究了家庭使用“绿色”产品和刺激物/喷雾剂对哮喘的2年影响,使用来自法国nutrinet - sant队列的纵向数据。方法:采用标准化问卷对2018年和2020年哮喘症状评分和家庭“绿色”产品和刺激物/喷雾剂的使用情况进行评估。研究了每周用药的演变(持续、增加或不使用)与(i) 2020年哮喘症状评分的关系;(ii) 2018-2020年间哮喘症状的发生率(发病率与无症状);(iii)通过logistic回归分析2018-2020年间哮喘症状的演变(改善、恶化vs症状稳定)。根据性别、年龄、吸烟状况、体重指数、教育水平和使用刺激物/喷雾剂(“绿色”产品)对模型进行了调整。结果:我们的研究基于30,012名成年人(平均年龄:49岁(sd:14), 74%为女性)。对于刺激物/喷雾剂,持续(40%)和增加(26%)使用与哮喘症状相关(平均评分比(MSR)分别为1.26[1.18-1.34]和MSR=1.14[1.06-1.22])、发病率(OR=1.30[1.16-1.45]和OR=1.07[0.95-1.20])和恶化(OR=1.48[1.19-1.85]和OR=1.28[1.01-1.64])。对于绿色产品,持续(20%)和增加(12%)的使用与2020年的症状相关(MSR=1.08[1.01-1.16]和MSR=1.07[0.99-1.16]),并且与发病率相关(OR=1.09[0.97-1.22]和OR=1.11[0.97-1.27])。结论:随着时间的推移,持续和增加使用刺激物/喷雾剂以及“绿色”产品与哮喘的有害影响有关。
{"title":"Longitudinal Associations Between Household Use of “Green” Cleaning Products and Asthma Symptoms","authors":"Emilie Pacheco Da Silva PhD ,&nbsp;Raphaëlle Varraso PhD ,&nbsp;Léopold K. Fezeu MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Pilar Galan MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Serge Hercberg MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mathilde Touvier PhD ,&nbsp;Christophe Paris MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nicole Le Moual PhD ,&nbsp;Orianne Dumas PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.09.027","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.09.027","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The household use of irritant and sprayed cleaning products is an established asthma risk factor, which could motivate consumers to turn to “green” products. However, only 2 cross-sectional studies, with inconsistent results, evaluated the potential respiratory health impacts of “green” products.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate 2-years effects on asthma of household use of “green” products and irritants/sprays, using longitudinal data from the French NutriNet-Santé cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The asthma symptom score and household use of “green” products and irritants/sprays were evaluated using standardized questionnaires in 2018 and 2020. The evolution of weekly use (persistent, increased <em>vs</em> no weekly use) was studied in association with (1) the asthma symptom score in 2020; (2) the incidence of asthma symptoms between 2018 and 2020 (incidence <em>vs</em> asymptomatic); and (3) the evolution of asthma symptoms between 2018 and 2020 (improvement, deterioration <em>vs</em> symptomatic stable) by logistic regressions. Models were adjusted for sex, age, smoking status, body mass index, educational level, and use of irritants/sprays (for “green” products).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our study was based on 30,012 adults (mean age: 49 ± 14 years; 74% women). For irritants/sprays, persistent (40%) and increased (26%) use was associated with asthma symptoms (mean score ratio MSR [95% CI values]: 1.26 [1.18-1.34], and MSR: 1.14 [1.06-1.22], respectively), incidence (odds ratio OR [95% CI values]: 1.30 [1.16-1.45], and OR: 1.07 [0.95-1.20], respectively), and deterioration (OR: 1.48 [1.19-1.85], and OR: 1.28 [1.01-1.64], respectively). For green products, persistent (20%) and increased (12%) use was associated with symptoms in 2020 (MSR: 1.08 [1.01-1.16], and MSR: 1.07 [0.99-1.16], respectively), and associations were suggested with incidence (OR: 1.09 [0.97-1.22], and OR: 1.11 [0.97-1.27], respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Persistent and increased use of irritants/sprays but also of “green” products was associated with deleterious effects on asthma over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"Pages 176-184.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145214432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transient hepatitis as a novel withdrawal phenomenon after danazol discontinuation in hereditary angioedema 遗传性血管性水肿患者停用那那唑后出现的一种新的停药现象——短暂性肝炎。
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.10.027
Mats de Lange MD , R. Bart Takkenberg MD, PhD , Joanne Verheij MD, PhD , Danny M. Cohn MD, PhD
{"title":"Transient hepatitis as a novel withdrawal phenomenon after danazol discontinuation in hereditary angioedema","authors":"Mats de Lange MD ,&nbsp;R. Bart Takkenberg MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Joanne Verheij MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Danny M. Cohn MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.10.027","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.10.027","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"Pages 300-302.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145423342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Fungal Sensitization on Long-Term Outcomes in Severe Asthma 真菌致敏对严重哮喘患者长期预后的影响。
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.10.025
Robin Réau MD , Pascale Nicaise PharmD , Axelle Dupont MD, PhD , Catherine Neukirch MD , Pierre Le Guen MD , Maud Garinat MD , Mathilde Le Brun MD , Camille Taillé MD, PhD

Background

Fungal sensitization has been associated with some features of severe asthma, but whether severe asthma with fungal sensitization (SAFS) requires specific management remains unclear. The long-term outcomes of SAFS remain poorly studied.

Objective

To assess the impact of fungal sensitization on disease severity using the Asthma Severity Scoring System (ASSESS) score and its evolution over time in a severe asthma cohort.

Methods

This retrospective analysis included adult patients with severe asthma evaluated at Bichat Hospital (Paris, France) between 2017 and 2022. All patients underwent specific IgE testing for Aspergillus, Botrytis, Alternaria, Penicillium, Cladosporium, and Candida. SAFS was defined as the presence of at least 1 positive specific IgE result.

Results

Among the 245 patients included, 69 (28.2%) had SAFS. At baseline, the ASSESS score was significantly higher in the SAFS group than in the severe asthma without fungal sensitization (SAwoFS) group (13.7 ± 2.8 vs 12.0 ± 3.0; P < .0001). This greater severity was supported by a lower FEV1 (65.5% vs 76.5% predicted; P = .0007), higher daily oral corticosteroid use (36.2% vs 18.2%; P = .0026), and higher hospitalization rates over the last 6 months (36.2% vs 19.9%; P = .007). At 12 months, the mean ASSESS score significantly decreased in both groups (SAFS: 12.4 ± 3.4; SAwoFS: 10.2 ± 3.6; P = .00015), but remained significantly higher in the SAFS group, driven by persistently lower FEV1 (65% vs 80% predicted; P = .0006), higher exacerbation rate (74.6% vs 55.3%; P = .008), and higher daily oral corticosteroid use (30% vs 14.7%; P = .009). Biologics were initiated in 51% of patients with SAFS and 56% of patients with SAwoFS. Among patients treated with biologics, ASSESS scores remained significantly higher in the SAFS group (12.8 vs 10.0; P = .0015).

Conclusions

Patients with SAFS represent a particularly severe asthma phenotype, even after treatment with biologics. Nonetheless, they show a significant response to standardized care for severe asthma.
背景:真菌致敏与严重哮喘的一些特征有关,但严重哮喘伴真菌致敏(SAFS)是否需要特殊的治疗尚不清楚。SAFS的长期结果研究仍然很少。目的:评估真菌致敏对严重哮喘队列中疾病严重程度的影响,使用评估评分及其随时间的演变。方法:回顾性分析2017年至2022年在法国巴黎Bichat医院接受评估的成年重症哮喘患者。所有患者都进行了曲霉、葡萄孢菌、葡萄孢菌、青霉、枝孢菌和念珠菌的特异性IgE检测。SAFS定义为至少有一个特异性IgE阳性结果。结果:245例患者中有69例(28.2%)发生SAFS。在基线时,SAFS组的评估评分明显高于无真菌致敏的SA (SAwoFS)组(13.7±2.8 vs. 12.0±3.0;p < 0.0001)。较低的FEV1(65.5%对76.5%的预测,p =0.0007)、较高的每日口服皮质类固醇(OCS)使用量(36.2%对18.2%,p = 0.0026)和较高的过去6个月住院率(36.2%对19.9%,p = 0.007)支持了这种更严重的程度。12个月时,两组患者的平均评估评分均显著下降(SAFS: 12.4±3.4;SAwoFS: 10.2±3.6;p =0.00015),但由于FEV1持续降低(65%对80%的预测,p = 0.0006)、加重率较高(74.6%对55.3%,p = 0.008)和较高的日常OCS使用(30%对14.7%,p = 0.009), SAFS评分仍显著升高。51%的SAFS和56%的SAwoFS患者开始使用生物制剂。在接受生物制剂治疗的患者中,评估评分在SAFS组中仍然显著较高(12.8比10.0;p = 0.0015)。结论:即使在接受生物制剂治疗后,SAFS患者也表现出特别严重的哮喘表型。尽管如此,他们对严重哮喘的标准化治疗表现出显著的反应。
{"title":"Impact of Fungal Sensitization on Long-Term Outcomes in Severe Asthma","authors":"Robin Réau MD ,&nbsp;Pascale Nicaise PharmD ,&nbsp;Axelle Dupont MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Catherine Neukirch MD ,&nbsp;Pierre Le Guen MD ,&nbsp;Maud Garinat MD ,&nbsp;Mathilde Le Brun MD ,&nbsp;Camille Taillé MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.10.025","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.10.025","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fungal sensitization has been associated with some features of severe asthma, but whether severe asthma with fungal sensitization (SAFS) requires specific management remains unclear. The long-term outcomes of SAFS remain poorly studied.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the impact of fungal sensitization on disease severity using the Asthma Severity Scoring System (ASSESS) score and its evolution over time in a severe asthma cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective analysis included adult patients with severe asthma evaluated at Bichat Hospital (Paris, France) between 2017 and 2022. All patients underwent specific IgE testing for <em>Aspergillus</em>, <em>Botrytis</em>, <em>Alternaria</em>, <em>Penicillium</em>, <em>Cladosporium</em>, and <em>Candida</em>. SAFS was defined as the presence of at least 1 positive specific IgE result.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 245 patients included, 69 (28.2%) had SAFS. At baseline, the ASSESS score was significantly higher in the SAFS group than in the severe asthma without fungal sensitization (SAwoFS) group (13.7 ± 2.8 vs 12.0 ± 3.0; <em>P</em> &lt; .0001). This greater severity was supported by a lower FEV<sub>1</sub> (65.5% vs 76.5% predicted; <em>P</em> = .0007), higher daily oral corticosteroid use (36.2% vs 18.2%; <em>P</em> = .0026), and higher hospitalization rates over the last 6 months (36.2% vs 19.9%; <em>P</em> = .007). At 12 months, the mean ASSESS score significantly decreased in both groups (SAFS: 12.4 ± 3.4; SAwoFS: 10.2 ± 3.6; <em>P</em> = .00015), but remained significantly higher in the SAFS group, driven by persistently lower FEV<sub>1</sub> (65% vs 80% predicted; <em>P</em> = .0006), higher exacerbation rate (74.6% vs 55.3%; <em>P</em> = .008), and higher daily oral corticosteroid use (30% vs 14.7%; <em>P</em> = .009). Biologics were initiated in 51% of patients with SAFS and 56% of patients with SAwoFS. Among patients treated with biologics, ASSESS scores remained significantly higher in the SAFS group (12.8 vs 10.0; <em>P</em> = .0015).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with SAFS represent a particularly severe asthma phenotype, even after treatment with biologics. Nonetheless, they show a significant response to standardized care for severe asthma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"Pages 196-204"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145423316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of Weight Loss on Asthma in Obese Adult Patients With Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 体重减轻对肥胖成人哮喘患者哮喘的影响——一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.10.014
Aleksandra Rybka-Fraczek MD, PhD, Izabela Orzolek MD, Marta Dabrowska MD, PhD

Background

Given its substantial impact on asthma, obesity is regarded as a treatable trait in asthma management.

Objective

This systematic review and meta-analyses aim to assess weight loss intervention effects on asthma control in obese adults with asthma.

Methods

We searched databases until February 2025 for English-language randomized controlled trials assessing weight loss influence on asthma control, quality of life, or lung function in obese adults. Six studies with 522 participants were included. Effect sizes were pooled as mean or standardized mean difference.

Results

Weight reduction over 12 to 24 weeks significantly improved Asthma Control Questionnaire score (–0.75; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] –0.91 to –0.59; I2 = 0.0%) and quality of life (1.05; 95% CI 0.17–1.93; I2 = 86.4%). Lung function also improved, with a mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second increase of 4.65% (95% CI 2.96–6.33; I2 = 0.0%). However, benefits were not sustained at the 52-week follow-up, showing no significant changes in asthma control (–0.67, 95% CI –1.48 to 0.14; I2 = 5.2%) or quality of life (0.05; 95% CI – 0.15 to 0.26; I2 = 0.8%). Subgroup analysis revealed that participants achieving 10% or greater reduction experienced marked asthma control improvements (–1.37; 95% CI –1.55 to –1.20; I2 = 0.0%).

Conclusions

Weight reduction over 12 to 24 weeks significantly improves asthma control, quality of life, and lung function, with pronounced benefits in individuals losing 10% or greater baseline weight. Effects were not maintained at 52 weeks, indicating sustained weight management necessity for preserve long-term benefits. Nevertheless, available data remain limited because findings primarily address short-term outcomes and were based on limited number of patients.
背景:鉴于肥胖对哮喘的重大影响,肥胖被认为是哮喘管理中可治疗的特征。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估减肥干预对肥胖成人哮喘患者哮喘控制的影响。方法:我们检索了截至2025年2月的数据库,以英语随机对照试验评估体重减轻对肥胖成人哮喘控制、生活质量或肺功能的影响。6项研究共纳入522名参与者。效应量以平均或标准化平均差合并。结果:体重减轻12-24周显著改善哮喘控制问卷评分(-0.75 95% CI [-0.91, - 0.59], I2 = 0.0%)和生活质量(1.05 95% CI [0.17, 1.93], I2 = 86.4%)。肺功能也有所改善,平均FEV1增加(4.65% 95% CI [2.96, 6.33], I2 = 0.0%)。然而,在52周的随访中,获益并未持续,哮喘控制(-0.67,95% CI [-1.48, 0.14], I2 = 5.2%)或生活质量(0.05,95% CI [-0.15, 0.26], I2 = 0.8%)没有显著变化。亚组分析显示,减少≥10%的受试者哮喘控制显著改善(-1.37,95% CI [-1.55, -1.20], I2 = 0.0%)。结论:体重减轻12-24周可显著改善哮喘控制、生活质量和肺功能,对体重减轻≥10%的个体有显著益处。效果在52周后没有维持,这表明需要持续的体重管理来保持长期的益处。然而,可用的数据仍然有限,因为研究结果主要针对短期结果,并且基于有限数量的患者。
{"title":"Effect of Weight Loss on Asthma in Obese Adult Patients With Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Aleksandra Rybka-Fraczek MD, PhD,&nbsp;Izabela Orzolek MD,&nbsp;Marta Dabrowska MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.10.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.10.014","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Given its substantial impact on asthma, obesity is regarded as a treatable trait in asthma management.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review and meta-analyses aim to assess weight loss intervention effects on asthma control in obese adults with asthma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched databases until February 2025 for English-language randomized controlled trials assessing weight loss influence on asthma control, quality of life, or lung function in obese adults. Six studies with 522 participants were included. Effect sizes were pooled as mean or standardized mean difference.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Weight reduction over 12 to 24 weeks significantly improved Asthma Control Questionnaire score (–0.75; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] –0.91 to –0.59; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%) and quality of life (1.05; 95% CI 0.17–1.93; I<sup>2</sup> = 86.4%). Lung function also improved, with a mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second increase of 4.65% (95% CI 2.96–6.33; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%). However, benefits were not sustained at the 52-week follow-up, showing no significant changes in asthma control (–0.67, 95% CI –1.48 to 0.14; I<sup>2</sup> = 5.2%) or quality of life (0.05; 95% CI – 0.15 to 0.26; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.8%). Subgroup analysis revealed that participants achieving 10% or greater reduction experienced marked asthma control improvements (–1.37; 95% CI –1.55 to –1.20; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Weight reduction over 12 to 24 weeks significantly improves asthma control, quality of life, and lung function, with pronounced benefits in individuals losing 10% or greater baseline weight. Effects were not maintained at 52 weeks, indicating sustained weight management necessity for preserve long-term benefits. Nevertheless, available data remain limited because findings primarily address short-term outcomes and were based on limited number of patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"Pages 153-163.e4"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145534782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Targeted Treatment in Asthma—Opportunities and Challenges 哮喘的靶向治疗——机遇与挑战。
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.11.023
Ioana Agache MD, PhD , Magdalena Zemelka-Wiacek PhD , Radosław Gawlik MD, PhD , Steve N. Georas MD, PhD , Karina Jahnz-Różyk MD, PhD , Maciej Kupczyk MD, PhD , Marcin Moniuszko MD, PhD , Ralph Mӧsges MD, PhD , Manali Mukherjee PhD , Parameswaran Nair MD, PhD , Alberto Papi MD, PhD , Marek Sanak MD, PhD , Ali Ӧnder Yildirim PhD , Marek Jutel MD, PhD
This review summarizes the key insights and future directions on targeted asthma treatment discussed during the 2025 Expert Meeting supported by the Central and Southern European Allergy and Asthma Alliance (CSEA3). Targeted treatment in asthma is becoming an attainable goal for selected patients but is not yet established as a standard asthma care pathway. The expert panel identified 4 key priorities to advance targeted asthma management: (1) Defining remission—a universally accepted, evidence-based definition is needed to guide clinical practice and guideline development. (2) The management of mild asthma guided by patient stratification according to asthma pathogenetic pathways (endotype) and risk profile may enable more tailored therapy and better outcomes. (3) Biomarker discovery and validation—research must prioritize predictive biomarkers that are easy to measure at the point of care, supported by innovative trials that combine precision immunology and machine learning. (4) Optimizing implementation and addressing the barriers to adopting stratified care, including limited resources and cost-effectiveness concerns, must be addressed. Digital tools offer promise but require further validation. Coordinated efforts are essential to translate advances in personalized asthma treatment into better outcomes and more sustainable care, particularly in resource-limited settings.
本文综述了由中欧和南欧过敏和哮喘联盟(CSEA3)支持的2025年专家会议上讨论的针对哮喘治疗的关键见解和未来方向。针对哮喘的靶向治疗正在成为特定患者可实现的目标,但尚未确立为标准的哮喘治疗途径。专家小组确定了推进针对性哮喘管理的四个关键优先事项:(1)定义缓解-需要一个普遍接受的,基于证据的定义来指导临床实践和指南制定。(2)根据哮喘发病途径(内型)和风险特征对轻度哮喘患者进行分层指导,可以实现更有针对性的治疗和更好的结果。(3)生物标志物的发现和验证——研究必须优先考虑易于在护理点测量的预测性生物标志物,并辅以结合精确免疫学和机器学习的创新试验。(4)必须解决分层护理的优化实施和障碍,包括有限的资源和成本效益问题。数字工具带来了希望,但需要进一步验证。协调努力对于将个性化哮喘治疗的进展转化为更好的结果和更可持续的护理至关重要,特别是在资源有限的环境中。
{"title":"Targeted Treatment in Asthma—Opportunities and Challenges","authors":"Ioana Agache MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Magdalena Zemelka-Wiacek PhD ,&nbsp;Radosław Gawlik MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Steve N. Georas MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Karina Jahnz-Różyk MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Maciej Kupczyk MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marcin Moniuszko MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ralph Mӧsges MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Manali Mukherjee PhD ,&nbsp;Parameswaran Nair MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alberto Papi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marek Sanak MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ali Ӧnder Yildirim PhD ,&nbsp;Marek Jutel MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.11.023","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.11.023","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This review summarizes the key insights and future directions on targeted asthma treatment discussed during the 2025 Expert Meeting supported by the Central and Southern European Allergy and Asthma Alliance (CSEA3). Targeted treatment in asthma is becoming an attainable goal for selected patients but is not yet established as a standard asthma care pathway. The expert panel identified 4 key priorities to advance targeted asthma management: (1) Defining remission—a universally accepted, evidence-based definition is needed to guide clinical practice and guideline development. (2) The management of mild asthma guided by patient stratification according to asthma pathogenetic pathways (endotype) and risk profile may enable more tailored therapy and better outcomes. (3) Biomarker discovery and validation—research must prioritize predictive biomarkers that are easy to measure at the point of care, supported by innovative trials that combine precision immunology and machine learning. (4) Optimizing implementation and addressing the barriers to adopting stratified care, including limited resources and cost-effectiveness concerns, must be addressed. Digital tools offer promise but require further validation. Coordinated efforts are essential to translate advances in personalized asthma treatment into better outcomes and more sustainable care, particularly in resource-limited settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"Pages 76-93"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145642211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Revisiting Type 2 Inflammation and Airway Hyper-responsiveness in COPD 重新审视COPD患者的2型炎症和气道高反应性
IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.10.033
Philipp Suter MD, Robert Greig MD, Rory Chan PhD, Brian J. Lipworth MD
Airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) is well established in asthma but remains under-recognized in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The recognition of COPD heterogeneity, particularly eosinophilic COPD and asthma COPD overlap, has increased interest in AHR as a clinical marker of type 2 (T2) inflammation. This phenotype is present in 20% to 40% of patients with COPD and has become a focus of clinical trials exploring biologics targeting IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin. We aim to review current evidence on AHR in COPD, its relationship with inflammatory phenotypes, diagnostic modalities, and therapeutic implications. AHR in COPD reflects both structural and inflammatory mechanisms. Direct challenges such as methacholine predominantly assess airway geometry, whereas indirect challenges such as mannitol reflect more activity of T2 inflammation and correlates consequently with eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide. Patients with AHR may derive greater benefit from inhaled corticosteroids than AHR-negative patients. Although AHR reduction has been demonstrated with biologics in asthma, no study has evaluated their effects on AHR in COPD. AHR represents a clinically relevant and promising treatable trait in COPD, particularly in T2-high phenotypes. Standardized challenges combined with the integration of inflammatory markers and targeted trials of biologics are needed to clarify its role in personalized COPD management and therapeutic decision-making.
气道高反应性(AHR)在哮喘中已经确立,但在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中仍未得到充分认识。认识到慢性阻塞性肺病的异质性,特别是嗜酸性粒细胞性慢性阻塞性肺病和哮喘性慢性阻塞性肺病重叠,增加了对AHR作为2型(T2)炎症临床标志物的兴趣。该表型存在于20%至40%的COPD患者中,并且已成为临床试验探索靶向IL-4, IL-5, IL-13和胸腺基质淋巴生成素的生物制剂的焦点。我们的目的是回顾目前COPD中AHR的证据,它与炎症表型、诊断方式和治疗意义的关系。慢性阻塞性肺病的AHR反映了结构和炎症机制。直接刺激如甲胆碱主要评估气道几何形状,而间接刺激如甘露醇反映更多T2炎症活动,因此与嗜酸性粒细胞和分数呼出一氧化氮相关。AHR患者可能比AHR阴性患者从吸入皮质类固醇中获益更大。虽然生物制剂已被证实可降低哮喘患者的AHR,但尚未有研究评估其对COPD患者AHR的影响。AHR代表了COPD临床相关且有希望治疗的特征,特别是在t2高表型中。需要标准化的挑战,结合炎症标志物和生物制剂的靶向试验,以明确其在个性化COPD管理和治疗决策中的作用。
{"title":"Revisiting Type 2 Inflammation and Airway Hyper-responsiveness in COPD","authors":"Philipp Suter MD,&nbsp;Robert Greig MD,&nbsp;Rory Chan PhD,&nbsp;Brian J. Lipworth MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.10.033","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.10.033","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) is well established in asthma but remains under-recognized in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The recognition of COPD heterogeneity, particularly eosinophilic COPD and asthma COPD overlap, has increased interest in AHR as a clinical marker of type 2 (T2) inflammation. This phenotype is present in 20% to 40% of patients with COPD and has become a focus of clinical trials exploring biologics targeting IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin. We aim to review current evidence on AHR in COPD, its relationship with inflammatory phenotypes, diagnostic modalities, and therapeutic implications. AHR in COPD reflects both structural and inflammatory mechanisms. Direct challenges such as methacholine predominantly assess airway geometry, whereas indirect challenges such as mannitol reflect more activity of T2 inflammation and correlates consequently with eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide. Patients with AHR may derive greater benefit from inhaled corticosteroids than AHR-negative patients. Although AHR reduction has been demonstrated with biologics in asthma, no study has evaluated their effects on AHR in COPD. AHR represents a clinically relevant and promising treatable trait in COPD, particularly in T2-high phenotypes. Standardized challenges combined with the integration of inflammatory markers and targeted trials of biologics are needed to clarify its role in personalized COPD management and therapeutic decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"Pages 67-75"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145904251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1