Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-15DOI: 10.1007/s10567-025-00536-4
Isha Dua, Parker Grant, Jazzmin Demy, Heather Prime
The current study is a scoping review on coparenting interventions with diverse families to assess how the characteristics, needs, and perspectives of participating coparents are addressed. We followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Eligibility criteria: participants belonged to racially minoritized groups (≥ 50% sample); studies reported on an intervention; the intervention targeted the coparental relationship OR assessed coparenting as an outcome. Demographics, study, and intervention characteristics, and the process and content of cultural adaptation were extracted. A systematic search was last executed in April 2025 in PsycINFO and MEDLINE, which yielded 1875 records. Following abstract/title screening, 409 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 35 studies were included in the review. Studies prioritized surface-level (e.g., language) over deep-level dimensions (e.g., goals). Few studies used an adaptation framework. We discuss how researchers and clinicians can consider the unique experiences of coparenting in diverse communities.
{"title":"Culturally Relevant Coparenting Interventions for Diverse Families: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Isha Dua, Parker Grant, Jazzmin Demy, Heather Prime","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00536-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10567-025-00536-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study is a scoping review on coparenting interventions with diverse families to assess how the characteristics, needs, and perspectives of participating coparents are addressed. We followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Eligibility criteria: participants belonged to racially minoritized groups (≥ 50% sample); studies reported on an intervention; the intervention targeted the coparental relationship OR assessed coparenting as an outcome. Demographics, study, and intervention characteristics, and the process and content of cultural adaptation were extracted. A systematic search was last executed in April 2025 in PsycINFO and MEDLINE, which yielded 1875 records. Following abstract/title screening, 409 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 35 studies were included in the review. Studies prioritized surface-level (e.g., language) over deep-level dimensions (e.g., goals). Few studies used an adaptation framework. We discuss how researchers and clinicians can consider the unique experiences of coparenting in diverse communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"684-707"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144638641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-06-16DOI: 10.1007/s10567-025-00530-w
Zixin Jiang, Yuqing Yang, Bin-Bin Chen
To determine the associations between parental differential treatment (PDT) and various psychopathological symptoms in children and its mechanisms, this systematic review integrated 26 studies spanning more than three decades, involving 37,025 participants. A network meta-analysis was employed to calculate correlations between absolute and relative PDT and specific symptoms (including anxiety, depression, aggression, and rule-breaking behavior), as well as broad-band symptoms (including internalizing and externalizing behavior) in children. Meta-analytic structural equation modelling was used to examine the mediating effect between PDT and psychopathology. Results indicated that a greater amount of PDT in the family (absolute PDT) was significantly associated with depression (r = 0.14, 95% CI [0.06, 0.22]), internalizing behavior (r = 0.14, 95% CI [0.06, 0.22]), aggression (r = 0.11, 95% CI [0.03, 0.19]), rule-breaking behavior (r = 0.21, 95% CI [0.08, 0.33]) and externalizing behavior (r = 0.13, 95% CI [0.04, 0.21]). Compared to favored siblings, disfavored children (relative PDT) displayed more anxiety (r = 0.11, 95% CI [0.01, 0.21]), depression (r = 0.10, 95% CI [0.00, 0.18]), internalizing behavior (r = 0.12, 95% CI [0.01, 0.23]), aggression (r = 0.12, 95% CI [0.02, 0.21]) and externalizing behavior (r = 0.20, 95% CI [0.10, 0.29]). Children who received less favoritism were at higher risk for psychopathology in cultures with higher levels of individualism. Furthermore, the sibling relationship factor mediated the association between absolute PDT and child psychopathology. These findings highlight that PDT may be a risk factor for both specific and broad-band symptoms of psychopathology and offer insights into its potential mechanisms.
{"title":"Parental Differential Treatment of Siblings and Child Psychopathology: A Network Meta-analysis.","authors":"Zixin Jiang, Yuqing Yang, Bin-Bin Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00530-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10567-025-00530-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine the associations between parental differential treatment (PDT) and various psychopathological symptoms in children and its mechanisms, this systematic review integrated 26 studies spanning more than three decades, involving 37,025 participants. A network meta-analysis was employed to calculate correlations between absolute and relative PDT and specific symptoms (including anxiety, depression, aggression, and rule-breaking behavior), as well as broad-band symptoms (including internalizing and externalizing behavior) in children. Meta-analytic structural equation modelling was used to examine the mediating effect between PDT and psychopathology. Results indicated that a greater amount of PDT in the family (absolute PDT) was significantly associated with depression (r = 0.14, 95% CI [0.06, 0.22]), internalizing behavior (r = 0.14, 95% CI [0.06, 0.22]), aggression (r = 0.11, 95% CI [0.03, 0.19]), rule-breaking behavior (r = 0.21, 95% CI [0.08, 0.33]) and externalizing behavior (r = 0.13, 95% CI [0.04, 0.21]). Compared to favored siblings, disfavored children (relative PDT) displayed more anxiety (r = 0.11, 95% CI [0.01, 0.21]), depression (r = 0.10, 95% CI [0.00, 0.18]), internalizing behavior (r = 0.12, 95% CI [0.01, 0.23]), aggression (r = 0.12, 95% CI [0.02, 0.21]) and externalizing behavior (r = 0.20, 95% CI [0.10, 0.29]). Children who received less favoritism were at higher risk for psychopathology in cultures with higher levels of individualism. Furthermore, the sibling relationship factor mediated the association between absolute PDT and child psychopathology. These findings highlight that PDT may be a risk factor for both specific and broad-band symptoms of psychopathology and offer insights into its potential mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"555-572"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144310796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-12DOI: 10.1007/s10567-025-00542-6
Yangdi Han,Xiaoxia Luo,Ying Xiong,Xinyi Peng,Lin Wang
Recent studies have shown that immigrant parents are at risk for various mental health issues, but there is a lack of meta-analyses on their prevalence. This systematic review aims to determine the prevalence of mental health problems (e.g., stress, anxiety, depression, and psychiatric disorders) in immigrant parents and identify contributing factors. We systematically searched multiple databases up to July 2023 and evaluated the quality of studies using AHRQ criteria. Pooled prevalence and 95% CI were used to assess mental health issues among immigrant parents, with subgroup analysis performed to examine influencing factors. A total of 33 studies with 214,536 participants found that mental health issues affected immigrant parents at a rate of about 25%, peaking at depression with a rate of about 24%. In the Middle East, this rate rose to 35%. Non-random sampling resulted in rates up to 43%, while cross-sectional study designs led to rates around 23%. Refugee parents and immigrant parents with lower educational attainment, reduced socioeconomic status, or limited host-country language proficiency demonstrated significantly elevated prevalence rates of psychological morbidity. The psychological challenges faced by immigrant parents are widespread. Future research should focus on the mental well-being of specific subgroups, such as immigrants from the Middle East, fathers, and low-income families. More rigorous survey methods and study designs (such as random sampling and cohort studies) are necessary to improve their mental health.
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Mental Health of Immigrant Parents.","authors":"Yangdi Han,Xiaoxia Luo,Ying Xiong,Xinyi Peng,Lin Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00542-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00542-6","url":null,"abstract":"Recent studies have shown that immigrant parents are at risk for various mental health issues, but there is a lack of meta-analyses on their prevalence. This systematic review aims to determine the prevalence of mental health problems (e.g., stress, anxiety, depression, and psychiatric disorders) in immigrant parents and identify contributing factors. We systematically searched multiple databases up to July 2023 and evaluated the quality of studies using AHRQ criteria. Pooled prevalence and 95% CI were used to assess mental health issues among immigrant parents, with subgroup analysis performed to examine influencing factors. A total of 33 studies with 214,536 participants found that mental health issues affected immigrant parents at a rate of about 25%, peaking at depression with a rate of about 24%. In the Middle East, this rate rose to 35%. Non-random sampling resulted in rates up to 43%, while cross-sectional study designs led to rates around 23%. Refugee parents and immigrant parents with lower educational attainment, reduced socioeconomic status, or limited host-country language proficiency demonstrated significantly elevated prevalence rates of psychological morbidity. The psychological challenges faced by immigrant parents are widespread. Future research should focus on the mental well-being of specific subgroups, such as immigrants from the Middle East, fathers, and low-income families. More rigorous survey methods and study designs (such as random sampling and cohort studies) are necessary to improve their mental health.","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144819884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-11DOI: 10.1007/s10567-025-00532-8
Kajung Hong,Nicholas M Morelli,Dalia R Tabibian,Michelle G Jimenez,David Straub,Miguel T Villodas
Past studies have consistently found that different informants disagree on ratings of youth's experiences. For instance, parents and youth report different prevalence and frequency ratings of youth's exposure to community violence (ECV), with past studies demonstrating that parents typically underreport youth's ECV compared to the youth. However, recent studies with advanced statistical analyses revealed more nuanced patterns of reports, with some parents overreporting their youth's ECV, some underreporting it, and other parent-youth dyads agreeing that the youth either did or did not experience ECV. These report patterns are theorized to provide valuable insight into parent-child relationships and family functioning and have implications for youth emotional and behavioral development. The current systematic review synthesized 14 existing studies (N = 12,824 parent-youth dyads) on parent-youth discrepancies in youth ECV to elucidate patterns of informant discrepancies and their correlates to parent-youth relationship quality, family functioning, and youth outcomes. Studies that used advanced analytic approaches (k = 2), such as latent class analysis and polynomial regression, identified multiple patterns of parent-youth reports (e.g., parent-youth agreement on either low or high levels of youth ECV, parental underreporting, parental overreporting compared to youth). Poor parent-youth relationship and family functioning (e.g., lower parental warmth, higher parental hostility) were associated with higher parent-youth discrepancies in youth ECV. There were mixed findings with patterns of informant discrepancies in youth ECV and youth functioning. Suggestions for future directions for research on parent-youth discrepancies in youth ECV were made.
{"title":"Systematic Review of Parent-Youth Discrepancies in Exposures to Community Violence.","authors":"Kajung Hong,Nicholas M Morelli,Dalia R Tabibian,Michelle G Jimenez,David Straub,Miguel T Villodas","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00532-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00532-8","url":null,"abstract":"Past studies have consistently found that different informants disagree on ratings of youth's experiences. For instance, parents and youth report different prevalence and frequency ratings of youth's exposure to community violence (ECV), with past studies demonstrating that parents typically underreport youth's ECV compared to the youth. However, recent studies with advanced statistical analyses revealed more nuanced patterns of reports, with some parents overreporting their youth's ECV, some underreporting it, and other parent-youth dyads agreeing that the youth either did or did not experience ECV. These report patterns are theorized to provide valuable insight into parent-child relationships and family functioning and have implications for youth emotional and behavioral development. The current systematic review synthesized 14 existing studies (N = 12,824 parent-youth dyads) on parent-youth discrepancies in youth ECV to elucidate patterns of informant discrepancies and their correlates to parent-youth relationship quality, family functioning, and youth outcomes. Studies that used advanced analytic approaches (k = 2), such as latent class analysis and polynomial regression, identified multiple patterns of parent-youth reports (e.g., parent-youth agreement on either low or high levels of youth ECV, parental underreporting, parental overreporting compared to youth). Poor parent-youth relationship and family functioning (e.g., lower parental warmth, higher parental hostility) were associated with higher parent-youth discrepancies in youth ECV. There were mixed findings with patterns of informant discrepancies in youth ECV and youth functioning. Suggestions for future directions for research on parent-youth discrepancies in youth ECV were made.","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144813203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Previous research on the Big Five personality traits has produced inconsistent findings regarding their role in bullying. This study is the first to use a three-level meta-analysis to investigate the associations between the Big Five personality traits and bullying and victimization among children and adolescents, considering moderators such as mean age, female percent, and type of bullying (traditional vs. cyberbullying). We included 29 studies (67 effect sizes) with 26,328 participants, spanning from 2002 to 2024 across multiple countries. The results showed that conscientiousness and agreeableness were negatively associated with bullying and victimization, while neuroticism was positively associated with both. Openness was unrelated to victimization but negatively associated with bullying. Extraversion was not associated with bullying or victimization. The moderating effects of mean age and female percent were not significant; however, the type of bullying moderated some of these associations. Specifically, victimization in cyberbullying was not significantly associated with extraversion or neuroticism, but in traditional bullying, victimization showed a significant negative association with extraversion and a significant positive association with neuroticism. Regarding bullying, conscientiousness and agreeableness exhibited significantly stronger associations with bullying in traditional bullying compared to cyberbullying. The study also found that publication year did not significantly moderate most of the relationships, indicating that the associations between personality traits and bullying behaviors have remained stable across time. These results could help for the early identification of bullies and victims in children and adolescents to ensure timely interventions.
{"title":"Relationship Between Bullying, Victimization, and the Big Five Personality Traits in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Linghan Sun,Jiaying Fan,Weixiao Wang,Zhongming Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00541-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00541-7","url":null,"abstract":"Previous research on the Big Five personality traits has produced inconsistent findings regarding their role in bullying. This study is the first to use a three-level meta-analysis to investigate the associations between the Big Five personality traits and bullying and victimization among children and adolescents, considering moderators such as mean age, female percent, and type of bullying (traditional vs. cyberbullying). We included 29 studies (67 effect sizes) with 26,328 participants, spanning from 2002 to 2024 across multiple countries. The results showed that conscientiousness and agreeableness were negatively associated with bullying and victimization, while neuroticism was positively associated with both. Openness was unrelated to victimization but negatively associated with bullying. Extraversion was not associated with bullying or victimization. The moderating effects of mean age and female percent were not significant; however, the type of bullying moderated some of these associations. Specifically, victimization in cyberbullying was not significantly associated with extraversion or neuroticism, but in traditional bullying, victimization showed a significant negative association with extraversion and a significant positive association with neuroticism. Regarding bullying, conscientiousness and agreeableness exhibited significantly stronger associations with bullying in traditional bullying compared to cyberbullying. The study also found that publication year did not significantly moderate most of the relationships, indicating that the associations between personality traits and bullying behaviors have remained stable across time. These results could help for the early identification of bullies and victims in children and adolescents to ensure timely interventions.","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144719999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
To examine and integrate the current state of knowledge regarding qualitative literature on the coping strategies employed by children, adolescents, and young adults of parents with a mental illness. A systematic literature search was conducted in November 2023 in the following databases: APA PsycInfo, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL Ultimate, and Psychology and Behavioral Science Collection. Peer-reviewed studies utilizing a qualitative or mixed-method design were eligible for inclusion. After quality assessment, a total of 14 articles were included. These studies were analyzed following a qualitative research synthesis, and the reported coping instances were extracted and classified into higher-order families of coping, as conceptualized by Skinner and colleagues (Skinner et al., Psychological Bulletin 129:216-269, 2003). Children, adolescents, and young adults of parents with a mental illness predominantly used support seeking and accommodation as coping strategies. This was followed by strategies such as escape, isolation, and self-reliance. A significant finding was the prominence of role reversal as a coping strategy, which did not fit into the existing system of higher-order families of coping. The established categories for classifying coping in normative samples require modification to better reflect the specific experiences of offspring of parents with a mental illness. Consequently, a new model of coping of COPMI (children of parents with a mental illness) is proposed, building on previous models and integrating findings from this review.
目的：研究和整合目前关于儿童、青少年和父母患有精神疾病的年轻人所采用的应对策略的定性文献。我们于2023年11月在APA PsycInfo、PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL Ultimate和Psychology and Behavioral Science Collection数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。采用定性或混合方法设计的同行评议研究符合纳入条件。经质量评价，共纳入14篇文献。这些研究在定性研究综合的基础上进行了分析，报告的应对实例被提取出来，并被斯金纳及其同事（Skinner et al., Psychological Bulletin, 129:216-269, 2003）概念化为应对的高阶家庭。父母患有精神疾病的儿童、青少年和年轻人主要使用寻求支持和住宿作为应对策略。紧随其后的是逃避、孤立和自力更生等策略。一个重要的发现是角色转换作为一种应对策略的重要性，这与现有的高阶应对家庭体系不相适应。在规范样本中建立的应对分类类别需要修改，以更好地反映患有精神疾病的父母的后代的具体经历。因此，在以往模型的基础上，结合本综述的研究结果，提出了一个新的COPMI（父母患有精神疾病的孩子）应对模型。
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis: Coping Strategies of Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults of Parents with a Mental Illness.","authors":"Franziska Sawitzki,Lina Kinzenbach,Hanna Christiansen,Nicola Großheinrich","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00540-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00540-8","url":null,"abstract":"To examine and integrate the current state of knowledge regarding qualitative literature on the coping strategies employed by children, adolescents, and young adults of parents with a mental illness. A systematic literature search was conducted in November 2023 in the following databases: APA PsycInfo, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL Ultimate, and Psychology and Behavioral Science Collection. Peer-reviewed studies utilizing a qualitative or mixed-method design were eligible for inclusion. After quality assessment, a total of 14 articles were included. These studies were analyzed following a qualitative research synthesis, and the reported coping instances were extracted and classified into higher-order families of coping, as conceptualized by Skinner and colleagues (Skinner et al., Psychological Bulletin 129:216-269, 2003). Children, adolescents, and young adults of parents with a mental illness predominantly used support seeking and accommodation as coping strategies. This was followed by strategies such as escape, isolation, and self-reliance. A significant finding was the prominence of role reversal as a coping strategy, which did not fit into the existing system of higher-order families of coping. The established categories for classifying coping in normative samples require modification to better reflect the specific experiences of offspring of parents with a mental illness. Consequently, a new model of coping of COPMI (children of parents with a mental illness) is proposed, building on previous models and integrating findings from this review.","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"709 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144720000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-18DOI: 10.1007/s10567-025-00539-1
Peter Muris,Henry Otgaar,Franc Donkers,Thomas Ollendick,Anne Deckers
In Part I (Muris et al. in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 22:549-561, 2025), we provided meta-analytic evidence showing that individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or high levels of autistic traits exhibit higher rates of problematic internet use (PIU), but paradoxically have lower levels of social media use compared to typically developing individuals or those with lower levels of autistic traits. The current theoretical article introduces a motivation-based developmental psychopathology model aimed at clarifying the motives behind the atypical internet and social media use observed in people with ASD or with high levels of autistic traits. We argue that excessive online activities, such as gaming and watching videos, can be understood through specific social, coping, and enhancement motives for internet use, which are especially prominent in ASD due to disorder-specific characteristics such as narrow interests and challenges in face-to-face interactions. In contrast, when it comes to social media use, these three motives operate differently, leading individuals with ASD to exhibit lower motivation to engage in online social interactions compared to neurotypical individuals. The current article emphasizes adolescence as a critical developmental period where internet use can easily become maladaptive and explores the role of parents in regulating the online behaviors of young people with ASD. Finally, the clinical implications of the model are briefly discussed.
在第一部分（Muris et al. In Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 22:54 -561, 2025）中，我们提供了荟萃分析证据，表明患有自闭症谱系障碍（ASD）或高水平自闭症特征的个体表现出更高的问题网络使用率（PIU），但与典型发展个体或低水平自闭症特征的个体相比，他们的社交媒体使用水平较低。目前的理论文章介绍了一个基于动机的发展精神病理学模型，旨在澄清在ASD患者或具有高水平自闭症特征的人群中观察到的非典型互联网和社交媒体使用背后的动机。我们认为，过度的在线活动，如游戏和观看视频，可以通过特定的社交、应对和增强互联网使用动机来理解，这在ASD中尤其突出，因为障碍的特定特征，如狭隘的兴趣和面对面互动的挑战。相比之下，当涉及到社交媒体的使用时，这三种动机的运作方式不同，导致自闭症患者与神经正常的人相比，表现出更低的参与在线社交互动的动机。目前的文章强调青春期是一个关键的发展时期，在这个时期，互联网的使用很容易变得不适应，并探讨了父母在规范自闭症青少年上网行为方面的作用。最后，简要讨论了该模型的临床意义。
{"title":"Caught in the Web of the Net? Part II: A Motivation-Based Developmental Psychopathology Model for the Aberrant Internet Use in (Young) People with Autism Spectrum Disorder.","authors":"Peter Muris,Henry Otgaar,Franc Donkers,Thomas Ollendick,Anne Deckers","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00539-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00539-1","url":null,"abstract":"In Part I (Muris et al. in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 22:549-561, 2025), we provided meta-analytic evidence showing that individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or high levels of autistic traits exhibit higher rates of problematic internet use (PIU), but paradoxically have lower levels of social media use compared to typically developing individuals or those with lower levels of autistic traits. The current theoretical article introduces a motivation-based developmental psychopathology model aimed at clarifying the motives behind the atypical internet and social media use observed in people with ASD or with high levels of autistic traits. We argue that excessive online activities, such as gaming and watching videos, can be understood through specific social, coping, and enhancement motives for internet use, which are especially prominent in ASD due to disorder-specific characteristics such as narrow interests and challenges in face-to-face interactions. In contrast, when it comes to social media use, these three motives operate differently, leading individuals with ASD to exhibit lower motivation to engage in online social interactions compared to neurotypical individuals. The current article emphasizes adolescence as a critical developmental period where internet use can easily become maladaptive and explores the role of parents in regulating the online behaviors of young people with ASD. Finally, the clinical implications of the model are briefly discussed.","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"281 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144664157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rehabilitative approaches to working with young people in the youth justice system have been identified as effective in reducing recidivism, with the centrality of relationships being core to these approaches. There is a limited evidence base exploring young people's experience of professional relationships within youth justice systems. This review aims to explore young peoples' experience of relationships with professionals within youth justice services and understand what is important to their engagement. Five databases were systematically searched for relevant peer-reviewed qualitative and mixed-method journal articles. Seven papers were included in this review. Data were analysed using a meta-synthesis approach. PRISMA and ENTREQ guidelines were followed. Analyses yielded four themes: Feeling valued and finding worth in the system; The reciprocal nature of understanding and respect; nobody trying to help and no one to try for; and the importance of having one good person. The importance of the relationships between youth justice professionals and young people are discussed. Limitations and implications for research, practice and policy are also discussed.
{"title":"Youth Justice Services: Relationships, Rehabilitation and the Reality of the Young People Involved-A Meta-synthesis of the Qualitative Literature.","authors":"Kerri Moore,Elayne Ahern,Eoin O'Meara Daly,Sharon Houghton,Hannah McAuliffe,Elaine Rogers","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00534-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00534-6","url":null,"abstract":"Rehabilitative approaches to working with young people in the youth justice system have been identified as effective in reducing recidivism, with the centrality of relationships being core to these approaches. There is a limited evidence base exploring young people's experience of professional relationships within youth justice systems. This review aims to explore young peoples' experience of relationships with professionals within youth justice services and understand what is important to their engagement. Five databases were systematically searched for relevant peer-reviewed qualitative and mixed-method journal articles. Seven papers were included in this review. Data were analysed using a meta-synthesis approach. PRISMA and ENTREQ guidelines were followed. Analyses yielded four themes: Feeling valued and finding worth in the system; The reciprocal nature of understanding and respect; nobody trying to help and no one to try for; and the importance of having one good person. The importance of the relationships between youth justice professionals and young people are discussed. Limitations and implications for research, practice and policy are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"153 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144586625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-07DOI: 10.1007/s10567-025-00535-5
Sarah E Freeman,Joely Reznik,Maitri Jain,Emily E Sokol,Dana Manning,Haley Rohde,Tamara M Loverich,Jamie M Lawler
Perinatal mental health challenges are associated with deleterious next-generation outcomes due in part to their impact on early parent-child relationships. Many perinatal interventions for caregivers with mental health difficulties target either parental mental health or parent-child relationships, despite ample evidence that these are related. This systematic review aimed to examine mental health and relational outcomes associated with perinatal interventions targeting caregiver and relational wellbeing. Seven electronic databases were searched to identify studies meeting the following criteria: (a) intervention targets parental mental health and parent-infant relational wellbeing (b) study design includes a comparison group, (c) study reports mental health and observed relational outcomes for all groups, (d) intervention is delivered to perinatal mothers by a professional, and (e) article is written in English. Data were tabulated to facilitate narrative synthesis and risk of bias analysis. Sixteen articles evaluating 13 interventions delivered to 1070 participants were included. Four interventions exhibited improvements in both outcomes, four demonstrated improvements in only one outcome, and five demonstrated improvements in neither. Clinical implications include support for the use of brief group and individual interventions that target mental health outcomes via support for emotion expression and problem-solving, and relational outcomes via in vivo guidance for sensitive parent-child interactions, promotion of reflective functioning, and addressing caregiver perceptions of parent-child relationships. Limitations related to study quality, design heterogeneity, and participant demographic homogeneity demand caution in interpretation of results and there is a need for higher quality research in this area. The review protocol was pre-registered with Prospero (ID: CRD42022380278).
{"title":"Perinatal Mental Health Interventions with a Parent-Child Relational Component: A Systematic Review of the Effects on Mothers and Dyads.","authors":"Sarah E Freeman,Joely Reznik,Maitri Jain,Emily E Sokol,Dana Manning,Haley Rohde,Tamara M Loverich,Jamie M Lawler","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00535-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00535-5","url":null,"abstract":"Perinatal mental health challenges are associated with deleterious next-generation outcomes due in part to their impact on early parent-child relationships. Many perinatal interventions for caregivers with mental health difficulties target either parental mental health or parent-child relationships, despite ample evidence that these are related. This systematic review aimed to examine mental health and relational outcomes associated with perinatal interventions targeting caregiver and relational wellbeing. Seven electronic databases were searched to identify studies meeting the following criteria: (a) intervention targets parental mental health and parent-infant relational wellbeing (b) study design includes a comparison group, (c) study reports mental health and observed relational outcomes for all groups, (d) intervention is delivered to perinatal mothers by a professional, and (e) article is written in English. Data were tabulated to facilitate narrative synthesis and risk of bias analysis. Sixteen articles evaluating 13 interventions delivered to 1070 participants were included. Four interventions exhibited improvements in both outcomes, four demonstrated improvements in only one outcome, and five demonstrated improvements in neither. Clinical implications include support for the use of brief group and individual interventions that target mental health outcomes via support for emotion expression and problem-solving, and relational outcomes via in vivo guidance for sensitive parent-child interactions, promotion of reflective functioning, and addressing caregiver perceptions of parent-child relationships. Limitations related to study quality, design heterogeneity, and participant demographic homogeneity demand caution in interpretation of results and there is a need for higher quality research in this area. The review protocol was pre-registered with Prospero (ID: CRD42022380278).","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144568392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-19DOI: 10.1007/s10567-025-00531-9
Yvette Rother,Carissa M Orlando,Peter Warren,Kate Flory
In the United States, suicide is the second leading cause of death for those aged 10-14 and the third for those aged 15-24. Adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are at an increased risk for suicide compared to adolescents without ADHD. However, the strength of the relation between ADHD and suicide and the mechanisms at play in this association are unclear and need further investigation. This systematic review examined the literature to determine whether there is a direct association between ADHD and suicidality in adolescents, and which factors moderate or mediate this relation. A systematic literature search, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was carried out on December 20th, 2024. Relevant publications were identified via electronic searches of PsycInfo and Web of Science databases. Studies were included if they assessed ADHD, suicidality, and at least one additional construct analyzed as a moderator or mediator. Studies had to include participants with a mean age between 10 and 19 years (i.e., an adolescent sample). The literature search yielded 405 articles, with 28 included in the final study selection. ADHD emerged as an independent risk factor for suicide among adolescents. Various constructs, including psychological, demographic, family, peer and social, subjective well-being, and trauma and adversity factors, served as moderators or mediators to varying degrees. Our review can inform adolescent suicide prevention efforts by highlighting the importance of addressing specific risk factors. Further research is needed to examine understudied factors, with emphasis on strengths-based factors to improve well-being.
在美国，自杀是10-14岁人群的第二大死因，是15-24岁人群的第三大死因。与没有注意缺陷多动障碍的青少年相比，患有注意缺陷多动障碍的青少年自杀的风险更高。然而，ADHD和自杀之间的关系强度以及在这种关联中起作用的机制尚不清楚，需要进一步调查。本系统综述对文献进行了检查，以确定ADHD与青少年自杀之间是否存在直接关联，以及哪些因素调节或调节了这种关系。按照系统评价和荟萃分析（PRISMA）指南的首选报告项目，于2024年12月20日进行了系统文献检索。通过PsycInfo和Web of Science数据库的电子检索确定了相关出版物。如果研究评估了ADHD、自杀倾向，并且至少有一个额外的构念被分析为调节或调节因素，则纳入研究。研究必须包括平均年龄在10到19岁之间的参与者（即青少年样本）。文献检索产生405篇文章，其中28篇纳入最终研究选择。ADHD成为青少年自杀的独立风险因素。心理因素、人口因素、家庭因素、同伴与社会因素、主观幸福感因素、创伤与逆境因素等构念在不同程度上起调节或中介作用。我们的综述可以通过强调处理特定风险因素的重要性，为青少年自杀预防工作提供信息。需要进一步的研究来检查未被充分研究的因素，重点是基于优势的因素来提高幸福感。
{"title":"ADHD and Suicidality in Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Moderators and Mediators.","authors":"Yvette Rother,Carissa M Orlando,Peter Warren,Kate Flory","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00531-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00531-9","url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, suicide is the second leading cause of death for those aged 10-14 and the third for those aged 15-24. Adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are at an increased risk for suicide compared to adolescents without ADHD. However, the strength of the relation between ADHD and suicide and the mechanisms at play in this association are unclear and need further investigation. This systematic review examined the literature to determine whether there is a direct association between ADHD and suicidality in adolescents, and which factors moderate or mediate this relation. A systematic literature search, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was carried out on December 20th, 2024. Relevant publications were identified via electronic searches of PsycInfo and Web of Science databases. Studies were included if they assessed ADHD, suicidality, and at least one additional construct analyzed as a moderator or mediator. Studies had to include participants with a mean age between 10 and 19 years (i.e., an adolescent sample). The literature search yielded 405 articles, with 28 included in the final study selection. ADHD emerged as an independent risk factor for suicide among adolescents. Various constructs, including psychological, demographic, family, peer and social, subjective well-being, and trauma and adversity factors, served as moderators or mediators to varying degrees. Our review can inform adolescent suicide prevention efforts by highlighting the importance of addressing specific risk factors. Further research is needed to examine understudied factors, with emphasis on strengths-based factors to improve well-being.","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144320352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号