首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review最新文献

英文 中文
The Association Between Parent-to-Child Fear Learning Pathways and Anxiety Sensitivity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 父母对子女的恐惧学习途径与焦虑敏感性之间的关系:系统回顾与元分析
IF 6.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-04-21 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-025-00517-7
Ena Alcan, Jana Gessner, Giulia Stangier, Christoph Benke, Jonas Busin, Hanna Christiansen, Christiane A. Melzig

Although anxiety sensitivity (AS), or the fear of anxiety-related symptoms, has been identified as a risk factor for the development of anxiety psychopathology, the pathways through which this fear is learned have not been fully elucidated. In the current review and meta-analysis, we aimed to systematically examine the association between parent-to-child fear learning pathways (vicarious learning, negative information, reinforcement, and punishment) and AS. A comprehensive search of literature was conducted in PsychINFO, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases, using search terms combining categories related to fear learning pathways, anxiety-related symptoms, parents, children, and adolescents. Based on this search strategy, 28 studies were identified as relevant, of which 11 were included in the systematic review and 10 in the meta-analysis. The overall findings indicated that parent-to-child fear learning pathways are significantly associated with AS. The meta-analysis demonstrated a small but significant association between fear learning pathways and AS, although the type of fear learning pathway did not significantly moderate this relationship. However, age emerged as a significant moderator, suggesting a stronger association in children and adolescents compared to adults. Given that these findings are primarily based on cross-sectional studies, this review underscores the need for longitudinal and experimental research to further clarify the role of parent-to-child fear learning pathways in anxiety sensitivity. Additionally, a better understanding of these pathways may help inform existing interventions and fear prevention strategies, such as those aimed at reducing parental modeling of fearful behaviors or promoting positive verbal messages about anxiety symptoms.

虽然焦虑敏感性(AS),或对焦虑相关症状的恐惧,已被确定为焦虑精神病理学发展的一个危险因素,但这种恐惧习得的途径尚未完全阐明。在当前的回顾和荟萃分析中,我们旨在系统地研究亲子恐惧学习途径(替代学习、负信息、强化和惩罚)与AS之间的关系。在PsychINFO、PubMed、Embase和Web of Science数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,检索词结合了与恐惧学习途径、焦虑相关症状、父母、儿童和青少年相关的类别。基于此搜索策略,确定了28项相关研究,其中11项纳入系统评价,10项纳入元分析。研究结果表明,亲子恐惧学习通路与AS有显著相关。meta分析显示恐惧学习途径与AS之间存在小而显著的关联,尽管恐惧学习途径的类型并没有显著调节这种关系。然而,年龄是一个重要的调节因素,这表明与成年人相比,儿童和青少年的相关性更强。鉴于这些发现主要是基于横断面研究,本综述强调需要进行纵向和实验研究,以进一步阐明父母对儿童的恐惧学习途径在焦虑敏感性中的作用。此外,更好地了解这些途径可能有助于告知现有的干预措施和恐惧预防策略,例如那些旨在减少父母对恐惧行为的模仿或促进有关焦虑症状的积极口头信息的策略。
{"title":"The Association Between Parent-to-Child Fear Learning Pathways and Anxiety Sensitivity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Ena Alcan, Jana Gessner, Giulia Stangier, Christoph Benke, Jonas Busin, Hanna Christiansen, Christiane A. Melzig","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00517-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00517-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although anxiety sensitivity (AS), or the fear of anxiety-related symptoms, has been identified as a risk factor for the development of anxiety psychopathology, the pathways through which this fear is learned have not been fully elucidated. In the current review and meta-analysis, we aimed to systematically examine the association between parent-to-child fear learning pathways (vicarious learning, negative information, reinforcement, and punishment) and AS. A comprehensive search of literature was conducted in PsychINFO, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases, using search terms combining categories related to fear learning pathways, anxiety-related symptoms, parents, children, and adolescents. Based on this search strategy, 28 studies were identified as relevant, of which 11 were included in the systematic review and 10 in the meta-analysis. The overall findings indicated that parent-to-child fear learning pathways are significantly associated with AS. The meta-analysis demonstrated a small but significant association between fear learning pathways and AS, although the type of fear learning pathway did not significantly moderate this relationship. However, age emerged as a significant moderator, suggesting a stronger association in children and adolescents compared to adults. Given that these findings are primarily based on cross-sectional studies, this review underscores the need for longitudinal and experimental research to further clarify the role of parent-to-child fear learning pathways in anxiety sensitivity. Additionally, a better understanding of these pathways may help inform existing interventions and fear prevention strategies, such as those aimed at reducing parental modeling of fearful behaviors or promoting positive verbal messages about anxiety symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143853500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial Intelligence Software to Accelerate Screening for Living Systematic Reviews 人工智能软件加速筛选生活系统评论
IF 6.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-04-18 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-025-00519-5
Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Allan Jones, Rajesh Vasa, Jacqui A. Macdonald, Camille Deane, Delyth Samuel, Tracy Evans-Whipp, Craig A. Olsson

Systematic and meta-analytic reviews provide gold-standard evidence but are static and outdate quickly. Here we provide performance data on a new software platform, LitQuest, that uses artificial intelligence technologies to (1) accelerate screening of titles and abstracts from library literature searches, and (2) provide a software solution for enabling living systematic reviews by maintaining a saved AI algorithm for updated searches. Performance testing was based on LitQuest data from seven systematic reviews. LitQuest efficiency was estimated as the proportion (%) of the total yield of an initial literature search (titles/abstracts) that needed human screening prior to reaching the in-built stop threshold. LitQuest algorithm performance was measured as work saved over sampling (WSS) for a certain recall. LitQuest accuracy was estimated as the proportion of incorrectly classified papers in the rejected pool, as determined by two independent human raters. On average, around 36% of the total yield of a literature search needed to be human screened prior to reaching the stop-point. However, this ranged from 22 to 53% depending on the complexity of language structure across papers included in specific reviews. Accuracy was 99% at an interrater reliability of 95%, and 0% of titles/abstracts were incorrectly assigned. Findings suggest that LitQuest can be a cost-effective and time-efficient solution to supporting living systematic reviews, particularly for rapidly developing areas of science. Further development of LitQuest is planned, including facilitated full-text data extraction and community-of-practice access to living systematic review findings.

系统的和元分析的评论提供了金标准的证据,但是是静态的,而且很快就过时了。在这里,我们提供了一个新的软件平台LitQuest的性能数据,该平台使用人工智能技术(1)加速对图书馆文献搜索中的标题和摘要的筛选,(2)通过维护保存的人工智能算法为更新的搜索提供一个软件解决方案,从而实现实时系统评论。性能测试基于七个系统审查的LitQuest数据。LitQuest的效率估计为在达到内置停止阈值之前需要人工筛选的初始文献搜索(标题/摘要)的总产量的比例(%)。LitQuest算法的性能以在一定召回率下节省的采样工作(WSS)来衡量。LitQuest的准确性估计为被拒绝的论文中被错误分类的论文的比例,由两个独立的人类评分者确定。平均而言,在达到停止点之前,大约36%的文献搜索总量需要进行人工筛选。然而,根据特定评论中包含的论文的语言结构的复杂性,这一比例从22%到53%不等。准确率为99%,互译信度为95%,0%的标题/摘要被错误分配。研究结果表明,LitQuest可以是一种成本效益和时间效率高的解决方案,以支持活体系统评价,特别是对于快速发展的科学领域。计划进一步开发LitQuest,包括便利的全文数据提取和社区实践访问实时系统评价结果。
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence Software to Accelerate Screening for Living Systematic Reviews","authors":"Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Allan Jones, Rajesh Vasa, Jacqui A. Macdonald, Camille Deane, Delyth Samuel, Tracy Evans-Whipp, Craig A. Olsson","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00519-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00519-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Systematic and meta-analytic reviews provide gold-standard evidence but are static and outdate quickly. Here we provide performance data on a new software platform, LitQuest, that uses artificial intelligence technologies to (1) accelerate screening of titles and abstracts from library literature searches, and (2) provide a software solution for enabling living systematic reviews by maintaining a saved AI algorithm for updated searches. Performance testing was based on LitQuest data from seven systematic reviews. LitQuest <i>efficiency</i> was estimated as the proportion (%) of the total yield of an initial literature search (titles/abstracts) that needed human screening prior to reaching the in-built stop threshold. LitQuest algorithm <i>performance</i> was measured as work saved over sampling (WSS) for a certain recall. LitQuest <i>accuracy</i> was estimated as the proportion of incorrectly classified papers in the rejected pool, as determined by two independent human raters. On average, around 36% of the total yield of a literature search needed to be human screened prior to reaching the stop-point. However, this ranged from 22 to 53% depending on the complexity of language structure across papers included in specific reviews. Accuracy was 99% at an interrater reliability of 95%, and 0% of titles/abstracts were incorrectly assigned. Findings suggest that LitQuest can be a cost-effective and time-efficient solution to supporting living systematic reviews, particularly for rapidly developing areas of science. Further development of LitQuest is planned, including facilitated full-text data extraction and community-of-practice access to living systematic review findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"219 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143847167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early Life Adversity and Empathy: A Scoping Review of Past Research and Recommendations for Future Directions 早期生活逆境与共情:对过去研究范围的回顾及对未来方向的建议
IF 6.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-025-00516-8
Isabella Kahhale, Amy Byrd, Jamie Hanson

Early life adversity (ELA) describes stressful experiences that may increase risk for psychopathology and impact emotion regulation and executive functioning systems. The influence of ELA on the development of empathy—the ability to understand and resonate with others’ thoughts and emotions—remains understudied, despite the fact that empathy development relies on cognitive and emotional abilities often affected by ELA. This scoping review summarized 43 empirical articles on ELA and empathy to clarify the muddled literature and address limitations to inform future research. Across various operationalizations of ELA and empathy, 15 articles suggested that ELA was associated with increased empathy, 19 that ELA was associated with decreased empathy, and 12 pointed to a null association. ELA and empathy showed differing associations across developmental periods, with ELA being more related to higher affective empathy and lower cognitive empathy in youth and higher personal distress in adulthood. Categorization by type of adversity revealed a lack of studies on deprivation and environmental adversity, while examination of empathy operationalization revealed a need for the assessment of empathy components among youth and more task-based measures of empathy. Recommendations for future research include the need to (a) clarify operationalizations of ELA, (b) explore empathy components and naturalistic measures, and (c) focus on outcomes in adolescence. Continued efforts to understand the connection between ELA and empathy will provide valuable insight into the impact of adversity on socioemotional development and guide psychosocial interventions for individuals at risk for maladaptive outcomes following adverse childhood experiences.

早期生活逆境(ELA)描述了可能增加精神病理风险和影响情绪调节和执行功能系统的压力经历。尽管同理心的发展依赖于经常受ELA影响的认知和情绪能力,但ELA对共情(理解他人的想法和情绪并与之产生共鸣的能力)发展的影响仍有待研究。本文总结了43篇关于ELA和共情的实证文章,以澄清混乱的文献,并指出局限性,为未来的研究提供信息。在ELA和共情的各种操作中,15篇文章认为ELA与共情增加有关,19篇文章认为ELA与共情减少有关,12篇文章指出无关联。ELA与共情在不同的发展时期表现出不同的相关性,青年时期ELA与较高的情感共情和较低的认知共情关系更密切,成年时期ELA与较高的个人痛苦关系更密切。逆境类型分类表明缺乏对剥夺和环境逆境的研究,而共情操作化的研究表明需要评估青年共情成分和更多基于任务的共情测量。对未来研究的建议包括需要(a)澄清ELA的操作方法,(b)探索共情成分和自然主义措施,以及(c)关注青少年的结果。继续努力了解ELA和共情之间的联系,将为逆境对社会情感发展的影响提供有价值的见解,并指导对童年不良经历后有适应不良后果风险的个体进行社会心理干预。
{"title":"Early Life Adversity and Empathy: A Scoping Review of Past Research and Recommendations for Future Directions","authors":"Isabella Kahhale, Amy Byrd, Jamie Hanson","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00516-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00516-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Early life adversity (ELA) describes stressful experiences that may increase risk for psychopathology and impact emotion regulation and executive functioning systems. The influence of ELA on the development of empathy—the ability to understand and resonate with others’ thoughts and emotions—remains understudied, despite the fact that empathy development relies on cognitive and emotional abilities often affected by ELA. This scoping review summarized 43 empirical articles on ELA and empathy to clarify the muddled literature and address limitations to inform future research. Across various operationalizations of ELA and empathy, 15 articles suggested that ELA was associated with <i>increased</i> empathy, 19 that ELA was associated with <i>decreased</i> empathy, and 12 pointed to a null association. ELA and empathy showed differing associations across developmental periods, with ELA being more related to higher affective empathy and lower cognitive empathy in youth and higher personal distress in adulthood. Categorization by type of adversity revealed a lack of studies on deprivation and environmental adversity, while examination of empathy operationalization revealed a need for the assessment of empathy components among youth and more task-based measures of empathy. Recommendations for future research include the need to (a) clarify operationalizations of ELA, (b) explore empathy components and naturalistic measures, and (c) focus on outcomes in adolescence. Continued efforts to understand the connection between ELA and empathy will provide valuable insight into the impact of adversity on socioemotional development and guide psychosocial interventions for individuals at risk for maladaptive outcomes following adverse childhood experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143677720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Parental Stress and Well-Being: A Meta-analysis 父母压力与幸福感:一项元分析
IF 6.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-025-00515-9
Petruța P. Rusu, Octav-Sorin Candel, Ionela Bogdan, Cornelia Ilciuc, Andreea Ursu, Ioana R. Podina

The current meta-analysis aims to investigate the relationship between parental stress and well-being, by focusing on the positive dimensions of parental well-being, such as happiness and life satisfaction, which are often overlooked in favor of negative outcomes like depression. It also extends the scope beyond specific populations, such as parents of children with special needs, to include parents of typically developing children. This meta-analysis included evidence from cross-sectional, longitudinal, daily diary, and intervention studies. By examining various moderators related to parent and child variables (such as gender, age, job status) and study characteristics, this analysis aims to inform more effective, targeted interventions to enhance parental well-being. Systematic searches of the Web of Science, PubMed, APA PsychNet, Scopus, ProQuest, and Google Scholar databases yielded 86 studies, involving 22,108 parents of children aged 0 to 18 years. The PROSPERO registration number for this study is CRD42023428750. Elected outcomes were continuous self-report measures to assess stress and well-being of parents. Our findings indicated a significant negative medium-sized association between parental stress and well-being (r = − .40), i.e., greater parental stress was robustly linked to reduced well-being. Higher-quality studies reported stronger stress-well-being associations, underscoring the role of methodological rigor in producing reliable estimates. Additionally, studies utilizing the Parental Stress Index (PSI) demonstrated stronger associations, highlighting its utility as a validated measure for capturing parental stress. Overall, these findings emphasize the need for evidence-based prevention and intervention programs to address parental stress and improve well-being.

当前的荟萃分析旨在调查父母压力与幸福感之间的关系,通过关注父母幸福感的积极方面,如幸福和生活满意度,这些方面往往被忽视,而倾向于抑郁等消极结果。它还将范围扩大到特定人群之外,例如有特殊需要儿童的父母,以包括典型发育儿童的父母。该荟萃分析包括来自横断面、纵向、每日日记和干预研究的证据。通过检查与父母和子女变量(如性别、年龄、工作状况)和学习特征相关的各种调节因素,本分析旨在为更有效、更有针对性的干预措施提供信息,以提高父母的幸福感。对Web of Science、PubMed、APA PsychNet、Scopus、ProQuest和b谷歌Scholar数据库的系统搜索产生了86项研究,涉及22108名0至18岁儿童的父母。本研究的PROSPERO注册号为CRD42023428750。选出的结果是持续的自我报告措施,以评估父母的压力和幸福感。我们的研究结果表明,父母压力与幸福感之间存在显著的负相关(r = - 0.40),即父母压力越大,幸福感越低。高质量的研究报告了更强的压力-幸福感关联,强调了方法严谨性在产生可靠估计中的作用。此外,利用父母压力指数(PSI)的研究显示出更强的相关性,突出了其作为捕捉父母压力的有效措施的效用。总的来说,这些研究结果强调需要基于证据的预防和干预计划来解决父母的压力和改善幸福感。
{"title":"Parental Stress and Well-Being: A Meta-analysis","authors":"Petruța P. Rusu, Octav-Sorin Candel, Ionela Bogdan, Cornelia Ilciuc, Andreea Ursu, Ioana R. Podina","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00515-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00515-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current meta-analysis aims to investigate the relationship between parental stress and well-being, by focusing on the positive dimensions of parental well-being, such as happiness and life satisfaction, which are often overlooked in favor of negative outcomes like depression. It also extends the scope beyond specific populations, such as parents of children with special needs, to include parents of typically developing children. This meta-analysis included evidence from cross-sectional, longitudinal, daily diary, and intervention studies. By examining various moderators related to parent and child variables (such as gender, age, job status) and study characteristics, this analysis aims to inform more effective, targeted interventions to enhance parental well-being. Systematic searches of the Web of Science, PubMed, APA PsychNet, Scopus, ProQuest, and Google Scholar databases yielded 86 studies, involving 22,108 parents of children aged 0 to 18 years. The PROSPERO registration number for this study is CRD42023428750. Elected outcomes were continuous self-report measures to assess stress and well-being of parents. Our findings indicated a significant negative medium-sized association between parental stress and well-being (<i>r</i> = − .40), i.e., greater parental stress was robustly linked to reduced well-being. Higher-quality studies reported stronger stress-well-being associations, underscoring the role of methodological rigor in producing reliable estimates. Additionally, studies utilizing the Parental Stress Index (PSI) demonstrated stronger associations, highlighting its utility as a validated measure for capturing parental stress. Overall, these findings emphasize the need for evidence-based prevention and intervention programs to address parental stress and improve well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143576240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Manualised Attachment-Based Interventions for Improving Caregiver-Infant Relationships: A Two-Stage Systematic Review. 改善照顾者与婴儿关系的基于态度的干预措施手册:两阶段系统回顾
IF 5.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-18 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-024-00497-0
A Wittkowski, C Crompton, M W Wan

As attachment-based interventions can improve caregiver-infant relationships and their subsequent psychological outcomes, the identification of relevant and effective interventions can facilitate their implementation into clinical practice. This systematic review aimed to a) provide an overview of manualised attachment-based interventions, without video-feedback as the main component, for caregivers and infants from conception to two years, and b) determine which of these interventions were effective in demonstrating improvements in caregiver-infant relational outcomes. To identify eligible interventions and their empirical evidence base, two search stages were conducted for 1) relevant interventions and 2) studies of interventions identified in the first stage that focussed on caregiver-infant relational outcomes. All studies included in Stage 2 were quality assessed and findings analysed. Twenty-six interventions were eligible for inclusion at Stage 1 but studies reporting on relational outcomes were identified for 16 interventions only. Forty studies reporting on those 16 interventions met inclusion criteria and were synthesised at Stage 2. Most studies were of good quality. Observer-rated measures were used in 90% of studies. There was evidence for these interventions in relation to improving caregiver-infant relational outcomes: 80% of studies reported a statistically significant positive change in a relational outcome for the intervention compared to pre-intervention or control group. The most promising evidence was identified for Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up (ABC), Minding the Baby (MTB) and Circle of Security (COS). This systematic review offers guidance to healthcare professionals, commissioners and policymakers within perinatal sectors in relation to the training, delivery and implementation of evidenced manualised attachment-based interventions.

由于基于依恋的干预措施可以改善照顾者与婴儿之间的关系及其随后的心理结果,因此确定相关的有效干预措施可以促进其在临床实践中的实施。本系统性综述旨在:a)概述以人工依恋为基础的干预措施(不以视频反馈为主要内容),适用于从受孕到两岁的照护者和婴儿;b)确定这些干预措施中哪些能有效改善照护者与婴儿之间的关系。为了确定符合条件的干预措施及其经验证据基础,我们进行了两个阶段的搜索:1)相关干预措施;2)在第一阶段中确定的干预措施研究,其重点是护理者与婴儿的关系结果。对第二阶段纳入的所有研究进行了质量评估和结果分析。第一阶段有 26 项干预措施符合纳入条件,但仅确定了 16 项干预措施的关系结果研究。报告这 16 项干预措施的 40 项研究符合纳入标准,并在第 2 阶段进行了综合。大多数研究质量良好。90% 的研究采用了观察者评分标准。有证据表明,这些干预措施可改善照顾者与婴儿之间的关系:80%的研究报告称,与干预前或对照组相比,干预后的关系结果出现了统计学意义上的积极变化。最有希望的证据是 "依恋与生物行为强化"(ABC)、"照顾婴儿"(MTB)和 "安全圈"(COS)。本系统综述为围产期部门的医疗保健专业人员、专员和政策制定者提供了有关培训、提供和实施基于依恋的实证手册化干预措施的指导。
{"title":"Manualised Attachment-Based Interventions for Improving Caregiver-Infant Relationships: A Two-Stage Systematic Review.","authors":"A Wittkowski, C Crompton, M W Wan","doi":"10.1007/s10567-024-00497-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10567-024-00497-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As attachment-based interventions can improve caregiver-infant relationships and their subsequent psychological outcomes, the identification of relevant and effective interventions can facilitate their implementation into clinical practice. This systematic review aimed to a) provide an overview of manualised attachment-based interventions, without video-feedback as the main component, for caregivers and infants from conception to two years, and b) determine which of these interventions were effective in demonstrating improvements in caregiver-infant relational outcomes. To identify eligible interventions and their empirical evidence base, two search stages were conducted for 1) relevant interventions and 2) studies of interventions identified in the first stage that focussed on caregiver-infant relational outcomes. All studies included in Stage 2 were quality assessed and findings analysed. Twenty-six interventions were eligible for inclusion at Stage 1 but studies reporting on relational outcomes were identified for 16 interventions only. Forty studies reporting on those 16 interventions met inclusion criteria and were synthesised at Stage 2. Most studies were of good quality. Observer-rated measures were used in 90% of studies. There was evidence for these interventions in relation to improving caregiver-infant relational outcomes: 80% of studies reported a statistically significant positive change in a relational outcome for the intervention compared to pre-intervention or control group. The most promising evidence was identified for Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up (ABC), Minding the Baby (MTB) and Circle of Security (COS). This systematic review offers guidance to healthcare professionals, commissioners and policymakers within perinatal sectors in relation to the training, delivery and implementation of evidenced manualised attachment-based interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"71-100"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885378/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Parenting Experiences in the Context of Parental Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis of the Qualitative Literature. 父母双相情感障碍背景下的养育经验:定性文献的系统回顾和综合。
IF 6.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-025-00513-x
En-Nien Tu, Kate E A Saunders, Helen Manley, Fiona Lobban, Steven Jones, Cathy Creswell

Parental bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with an increased risk of mental health problems in children. Despite the urgent need for clear guidance on how best to support parents with BD, current research lacks a unified analysis of the challenges and needs faced by these parents and their children. This review aims to explore the impact of BD on experiences of parent-child interactions or relationships to inform effective policies and interventions. Following a preregistered PROSPERO protocol, we searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and CINAHL for qualitative studies on parents with BD and their children (under 19 years) published since 1994. Each study was independently screened and jointly assessed for quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program. Our thematic synthesis entailed coding in NVivo, followed by collaborative theme generation on the Miro platform. We reviewed 19 studies, of which 9 studies reported on parents, 8 on children, and 2 on both parents and children. Our analysis generated four themes: (1) "The multifaceted landscape of parenting with BD," which outlines how mood swings affect parenting in diverse ways; (2) "The evolving dynamic of child-parent relationship amidst parental BD," including how children adapt and grow in understanding and responsibility in response to their parent's BD; (3) "The dual nature of childcare for parents with BD," which explores how childcare impacts parents' emotions and motivations, bringing both uplifting and challenging effects; (4) "Navigating parental challenges in the context of BD," highlighting the importance of open communication, self-reflection, and timely, unbiased support to mitigate challenges associated with parental BD. This qualitative synthesis focuses specifically on the parenting experiences of families affected by parental BD. It highlights the complex, dynamic impact of BD on parenting behaviors and children's coping mechanisms, calling for tailored therapeutic interventions that benefit both parents and children. The scope of our study is limited by factors such as a predominance of Western perspectives and an underrepresentation of fathers' experiences, highlighting the need for more diverse research in this area.

父母双相情感障碍(BD)与儿童心理健康问题的风险增加有关。尽管迫切需要明确的指导,如何最好地支持双相障碍父母,但目前的研究缺乏对这些父母及其孩子面临的挑战和需求的统一分析。本综述旨在探讨双相障碍对亲子互动或关系体验的影响,为有效的政策和干预提供信息。按照预先注册的PROSPERO方案,我们检索Medline、Embase、PsycINFO、SCOPUS和CINAHL,检索自1994年以来发表的关于双相障碍父母及其子女(19岁以下)的定性研究。每个研究都是独立筛选的,并使用关键评估技能计划联合评估质量。我们的主题合成需要在NVivo中编码,然后在Miro平台上协作生成主题。我们回顾了19项研究,其中9项研究是关于父母的,8项是关于孩子的,2项是关于父母和孩子的。我们的分析产生了四个主题:(1)《双相障碍患者养育的多面性》,概述了情绪波动如何以不同的方式影响养育;(2) “父母双相障碍中亲子关系的演变动态”,包括孩子如何适应和成长对父母双相障碍的理解和责任;(3)“双相障碍父母育儿的双重性质”,探讨育儿如何影响父母的情绪和动机,带来令人振奋和具有挑战性的影响;(4)“在双相障碍的背景下应对父母的挑战,”强调开放沟通、自我反思和及时、公正支持的重要性,以减轻与父母双相障碍相关的挑战。这一定性综合研究特别关注受父母双相障碍影响的家庭的育儿经历。它强调了双相障碍对育儿行为和儿童应对机制的复杂、动态影响,呼吁量身定制的治疗干预措施,使父母和孩子都受益。我们的研究范围受到一些因素的限制,如西方观点占主导地位和父亲经验的代表性不足,这突出了在这一领域进行更多样化研究的必要性。
{"title":"Parenting Experiences in the Context of Parental Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis of the Qualitative Literature.","authors":"En-Nien Tu, Kate E A Saunders, Helen Manley, Fiona Lobban, Steven Jones, Cathy Creswell","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00513-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10567-025-00513-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parental bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with an increased risk of mental health problems in children. Despite the urgent need for clear guidance on how best to support parents with BD, current research lacks a unified analysis of the challenges and needs faced by these parents and their children. This review aims to explore the impact of BD on experiences of parent-child interactions or relationships to inform effective policies and interventions. Following a preregistered PROSPERO protocol, we searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and CINAHL for qualitative studies on parents with BD and their children (under 19 years) published since 1994. Each study was independently screened and jointly assessed for quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program. Our thematic synthesis entailed coding in NVivo, followed by collaborative theme generation on the Miro platform. We reviewed 19 studies, of which 9 studies reported on parents, 8 on children, and 2 on both parents and children. Our analysis generated four themes: (1) \"The multifaceted landscape of parenting with BD,\" which outlines how mood swings affect parenting in diverse ways; (2) \"The evolving dynamic of child-parent relationship amidst parental BD,\" including how children adapt and grow in understanding and responsibility in response to their parent's BD; (3) \"The dual nature of childcare for parents with BD,\" which explores how childcare impacts parents' emotions and motivations, bringing both uplifting and challenging effects; (4) \"Navigating parental challenges in the context of BD,\" highlighting the importance of open communication, self-reflection, and timely, unbiased support to mitigate challenges associated with parental BD. This qualitative synthesis focuses specifically on the parenting experiences of families affected by parental BD. It highlights the complex, dynamic impact of BD on parenting behaviors and children's coping mechanisms, calling for tailored therapeutic interventions that benefit both parents and children. The scope of our study is limited by factors such as a predominance of Western perspectives and an underrepresentation of fathers' experiences, highlighting the need for more diverse research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"142-170"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885391/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143416152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction: Siblings of Persons with Disabilities: A Systematic Integrative Review of the Empirical Literature. 修正:残障人士的兄弟姐妹:实证文献的系统综合回顾。
IF 5.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-024-00510-6
Annalisa Levante, Chiara Martis, Cristina Maria Del Prete, Paola Martino, Patrizia Primiceri, Flavia Lecciso
{"title":"Correction: Siblings of Persons with Disabilities: A Systematic Integrative Review of the Empirical Literature.","authors":"Annalisa Levante, Chiara Martis, Cristina Maria Del Prete, Paola Martino, Patrizia Primiceri, Flavia Lecciso","doi":"10.1007/s10567-024-00510-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10567-024-00510-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"254"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885349/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142752107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Where Is the Parent’s Voice? A Meta-Synthesis of Parental Experiences of Video Feedback Parenting Interventions 父母的声音在哪里?视频反馈育儿干预父母经验的综合研究
IF 6.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-025-00514-w
Ming Wai Wan, Tarendeep. K. Johal, Anja Wittkowski

Video-aided feedback (VF) is a well-evidenced intervention technique to enhance the relationship between a parent and their young child. While parental acceptability is foundational to engagement and intervention efficacy, the parent’s perspective is only now emerging as a valued consideration when evaluating VF-based interventions. This systematic review metasynthesised qualitative research on the experiences of primary caregivers with a young child (primarily 0–30 months) of participating in a VF parenting intervention. A search of nine databases yielded 17 studies (10 published since 2020) involving parents who had participated in range of VF-focussed programmes. Thematic synthesis identified six themes: (1) Getting past the fear and discomfort: Being ‘good enough’ and ‘doing the right thing’; (2) The power of video: “I had never really noticed that before‟ (with two subthemes: video as validation and for seeing child behavioural intentionality; video as an agent for change); (3) The practitioner’s skill and role in creating a safe space; (4) The approach was too intangible, inflexible, positive, unclear; (5) When the intervention is over: Positive change and generalisation; (6) Parental engagement and involvement: Barriers and enhancements. While most parents reported experiencing a range of interpersonal and intrapersonal benefits from taking part in a VF parenting intervention, having to overcome initial strong negative and uncomfortable feelings were an important part of the journey. Some parents could not see the value of the approach or did not perceive the intervention to meet their needs. Insights into parental experience are complementary to outcome-based evaluations. However, biased design (e.g., only one study included intervention non-completers) and variable study quality need addressing in future studies. Implications for practice are discussed.

视频辅助反馈(VF)是一种得到充分证明的干预技术,可以增强父母与幼儿之间的关系。虽然父母的可接受性是参与和干预效果的基础,但在评估基于vf的干预措施时,父母的观点现在才成为一个有价值的考虑因素。本系统综述综合了对幼儿(主要是0-30个月)的主要照顾者参与VF育儿干预的经验的定性研究。对9个数据库的搜索得出了17项研究(自2020年以来发表的10项研究),涉及参加了一系列以vf为重点的项目的父母。主题综合确定了六个主题:(1)克服恐惧和不适:“足够好”和“做正确的事”;(2)视频的力量:“我以前从来没有真正注意到这一点”(有两个次要主题:视频作为验证和看到孩子的行为意向性;视频作为变革的推动者);(3)从业者在创造安全空间中的技能和角色;(4)方法过于无形、呆板、积极、不明确;(5)干预结束后:积极改变和推广;(6)父母参与与参与:障碍与增强。虽然大多数父母报告说,通过参加VF育儿干预,他们在人际关系和个人关系方面都有了一系列的好处,但克服最初强烈的负面和不舒服的感觉是这一过程的重要组成部分。一些家长看不到这种方法的价值,或者没有意识到这种干预措施能满足他们的需求。对父母经历的洞察是对基于结果的评估的补充。然而,偏倚的设计(例如,只有一项研究包括干预未完成者)和可变的研究质量需要在未来的研究中解决。讨论了对实践的启示。
{"title":"Where Is the Parent’s Voice? A Meta-Synthesis of Parental Experiences of Video Feedback Parenting Interventions","authors":"Ming Wai Wan, Tarendeep. K. Johal, Anja Wittkowski","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00514-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00514-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Video-aided feedback (VF) is a well-evidenced intervention technique to enhance the relationship between a parent and their young child. While parental acceptability is foundational to engagement and intervention efficacy, the parent’s perspective is only now emerging as a valued consideration when evaluating VF-based interventions. This systematic review metasynthesised qualitative research on the experiences of primary caregivers with a young child (primarily 0–30 months) of participating in a VF parenting intervention. A search of nine databases yielded 17 studies (10 published since 2020) involving parents who had participated in range of VF-focussed programmes. Thematic synthesis identified six themes: (1) Getting past the fear and discomfort: Being ‘good enough’ and ‘doing the right thing’; (2) The power of video: “I had never really noticed that before‟ (with two subthemes: video as validation and for seeing child behavioural intentionality; video as an agent for change); (3) The practitioner’s skill and role in creating a safe space; (4) The approach was too intangible, inflexible, positive, unclear; (5) When the intervention is over: Positive change and generalisation; (6) Parental engagement and involvement: Barriers and enhancements. While most parents reported experiencing a range of interpersonal and intrapersonal benefits from taking part in a VF parenting intervention, having to overcome initial strong negative and uncomfortable feelings were an important part of the journey. Some parents could not see the value of the approach or did not perceive the intervention to meet their needs. Insights into parental experience are complementary to outcome-based evaluations. However, biased design (e.g., only one study included intervention non-completers) and variable study quality need addressing in future studies. Implications for practice are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143072581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Motivations for Self-Harm in Young People and Their Correlates: A Systematic Review 青少年自残动机及其相关因素:系统综述
IF 6.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-024-00511-5
S. Tang, A. Hoye, A. Slade, B. Tang, G. Holmes, H. Fujimoto, W.-Y. Zheng, S. Ravindra, H. Christensen, A. L. Calear

Self-harm in young people is associated with increased risk of suicide and other negative long-term outcomes. Understanding the motivations driving self-harm behaviours among young people can help to inform the development of preventative and treatment interventions. Self-harm rates have been rising, but reviews of the recent quantitative literature have not been undertaken. PsycInfo, Embase and Medline were systematically searched in September 2024 for studies published in the past ten years. Quantitative studies that examined motivations for self-harm (including prevalence and/or correlates) among young people (aged 10 to 24 years) with a history of self-harm were included in the review. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023429568). One hundred and seventeen studies met inclusion criteria. Intrapersonal motivations for self-harm (particularly emotion regulation, anti-dissociation and self-punishment) were more common than interpersonal motivations (e.g. peer bonding, communication). Intrapersonal motivations correlated with female gender, higher self-harm severity, current, repetitive and persistent self-harm, suicidality, poorer mental health and poorer emotion regulation. There was evidence to suggest that interpersonal motives are associated with younger age and some mental health difficulties (e.g. anxiety). Young people predominantly self-harm for intrapersonal reasons. Given that self-harm for intrapersonal reasons is associated with greater self-harm severity, suicidality and poor mental health, steps should be taken to prevent and reduce self-harm. Interventions for self-harm require a multifaceted approach that not only provides young people with alternate ways of regulating their emotions, but also targets risk factors that contribute to self-harm.

年轻人的自残与自杀和其他负面长期后果的风险增加有关。了解推动年轻人自残行为的动机有助于为制定预防和治疗干预措施提供信息。自残率一直在上升,但对最近的定量文献的评论还没有进行。2024年9月,PsycInfo、Embase和Medline系统地检索了过去十年发表的研究。有自残史的年轻人(10至24岁)的自残动机(包括患病率和/或相关性)的定量研究也包括在综述中。该审查按照PRISMA指南进行,并在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023429568)。117项研究符合纳入标准。自我伤害的内在动机(尤其是情绪调节、反分离和自我惩罚)比人际动机(如同伴关系、沟通)更常见。内省动机与女性性别、较高的自残严重程度、当前、重复和持续的自残、自杀倾向、较差的心理健康和较差的情绪调节相关。有证据表明,人际动机与年龄较小和一些心理健康问题(如焦虑)有关。年轻人自残主要是出于个人原因。鉴于出于个人原因的自我伤害与更严重的自我伤害、自杀倾向和精神健康状况不佳有关,应采取措施预防和减少自我伤害。对自我伤害的干预需要多方面的方法,不仅要为年轻人提供调节情绪的替代方法,还要针对导致自我伤害的风险因素。
{"title":"Motivations for Self-Harm in Young People and Their Correlates: A Systematic Review","authors":"S. Tang, A. Hoye, A. Slade, B. Tang, G. Holmes, H. Fujimoto, W.-Y. Zheng, S. Ravindra, H. Christensen, A. L. Calear","doi":"10.1007/s10567-024-00511-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-024-00511-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Self-harm in young people is associated with increased risk of suicide and other negative long-term outcomes. Understanding the motivations driving self-harm behaviours among young people can help to inform the development of preventative and treatment interventions. Self-harm rates have been rising, but reviews of the recent quantitative literature have not been undertaken. PsycInfo, Embase and Medline were systematically searched in September 2024 for studies published in the past ten years. Quantitative studies that examined motivations for self-harm (including prevalence and/or correlates) among young people (aged 10 to 24 years) with a history of self-harm were included in the review. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023429568). One hundred and seventeen studies met inclusion criteria. Intrapersonal motivations for self-harm (particularly emotion regulation, anti-dissociation and self-punishment) were more common than interpersonal motivations (e.g. peer bonding, communication). Intrapersonal motivations correlated with female gender, higher self-harm severity, current, repetitive and persistent self-harm, suicidality, poorer mental health and poorer emotion regulation. There was evidence to suggest that interpersonal motives are associated with younger age and some mental health difficulties (e.g. anxiety). Young people predominantly self-harm for intrapersonal reasons. Given that self-harm for intrapersonal reasons is associated with greater self-harm severity, suicidality and poor mental health, steps should be taken to prevent and reduce self-harm. Interventions for self-harm require a multifaceted approach that not only provides young people with alternate ways of regulating their emotions, but also targets risk factors that contribute to self-harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143056628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Irritability as a Transdiagnostic Construct Across Childhood and Adolescence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 易激惹是跨越儿童期和青春期的跨诊断结构:系统回顾与元分析
IF 6.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-024-00512-4
Miriam Chin, Davina A. Robson, Hannah Woodbridge, David J. Hawes

This meta-analytic review examined irritability across childhood and adolescence as it relates to symptoms of common mental health disorders in these periods. Of key interest was whether the relationship between irritability and symptom severity varies according to symptom domain. This was tested at the level of broad symptom dimensions (internalizing versus externalizing problems) as well as discrete diagnostic domains (e.g., anxiety, depression, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; autism spectrum disorder). Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of five databases was conducted to identify studies reporting on associations between irritability and mental health symptoms in samples of children aged 2–18 years. Meta-analytic tests based on random effects models examined concurrent and longitudinal associations between irritability and symptom severity. Meta-regression tested potential moderators including symptom domain, child age, sex, informant type, and study quality. 119 studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 122,456 participants. A significant and positive association was found between irritability and severity of concurrent overall psychopathology in the order of a moderate effect size, while small to moderate effect sizes characterized the association between irritability and later mental health outcomes in prospective data. Further variation in this association was seen across specific diagnostic domains and methodological moderators. Findings support the conceptualization of irritability as a transdiagnostic construct reflecting emotion dysregulation across diverse forms of psychopathology in childhood and adolescence. Further research into the risk mechanisms underlying irritability is needed, in addition to translational approaches to early intervention.

这项荟萃分析回顾了童年和青春期的易怒,因为它与这些时期常见的精神健康障碍的症状有关。关键的兴趣是易怒和症状严重程度之间的关系是否根据症状领域而变化。这在广泛的症状维度(内在化与外在化问题)和离散的诊断领域(如焦虑、抑郁、对立违抗性障碍、行为障碍、注意缺陷多动障碍;自闭症谱系障碍)。遵循PRISMA指南,对5个数据库进行了系统搜索,以确定2-18岁儿童样本中易怒与心理健康症状之间关联的研究报告。基于随机效应模型的荟萃分析检验了易怒和症状严重程度之间的并发和纵向关联。meta回归测试了潜在的调节因素,包括症状域、儿童年龄、性别、被调查者类型和研究质量。119项研究符合纳入标准,共有122,456名参与者。在预期数据中,易怒与并发整体精神病理的严重程度之间存在显著的正相关,其效应大小为中等,而小到中等的效应大小表征了易怒与后来的心理健康结果之间的关联。这种关联的进一步变化在特定的诊断领域和方法调节因子中可见。研究结果支持易怒作为一种跨诊断结构的概念化,反映了儿童和青少年各种形式的精神病理中的情绪失调。除了早期干预的转化方法外,还需要进一步研究易怒的风险机制。
{"title":"Irritability as a Transdiagnostic Construct Across Childhood and Adolescence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Miriam Chin, Davina A. Robson, Hannah Woodbridge, David J. Hawes","doi":"10.1007/s10567-024-00512-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-024-00512-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This meta-analytic review examined irritability across childhood and adolescence as it relates to symptoms of common mental health disorders in these periods. Of key interest was whether the relationship between irritability and symptom severity varies according to symptom domain. This was tested at the level of broad symptom dimensions (internalizing versus externalizing problems) as well as discrete diagnostic domains (e.g., anxiety, depression, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; autism spectrum disorder). Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of five databases was conducted to identify studies reporting on associations between irritability and mental health symptoms in samples of children aged 2–18 years. Meta-analytic tests based on random effects models examined concurrent and longitudinal associations between irritability and symptom severity. Meta-regression tested potential moderators including symptom domain, child age, sex, informant type, and study quality. 119 studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 122,456 participants. A significant and positive association was found between irritability and severity of concurrent overall psychopathology in the order of a moderate effect size, while small to moderate effect sizes characterized the association between irritability and later mental health outcomes in prospective data. Further variation in this association was seen across specific diagnostic domains and methodological moderators. Findings support the conceptualization of irritability as a transdiagnostic construct reflecting emotion dysregulation across diverse forms of psychopathology in childhood and adolescence. Further research into the risk mechanisms underlying irritability is needed, in addition to translational approaches to early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142989911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1