Pub Date : 2022-05-17DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2022.2077123
Stephanie Kelly, Michelle T. Violanti, Emily Denton, Ian Berry
ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to identify how instructor misbehaviors influence students’ writing apprehension. Research prior to this study determined that students’ writing performance is hindered by their writing apprehension (e.g., Zabihi, 2018). The present study’s data indicate instructor misbehaviors of antagonism and lectures indirectly influence students’ writing apprehension through the mediation of students’ burnout. As such, the more instructors show antagonism and engage in boring, disorganized lecturing behaviors, the higher their students’ writing apprehension. Without careful communication management, professors of writing-intensive courses whose primary role is to help students improve their writing skills may become the barrier that prevents students from improving their writing skills.
{"title":"Instructor misbehaviors as predictors of students’ writing apprehension","authors":"Stephanie Kelly, Michelle T. Violanti, Emily Denton, Ian Berry","doi":"10.1080/01463373.2022.2077123","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2022.2077123","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to identify how instructor misbehaviors influence students’ writing apprehension. Research prior to this study determined that students’ writing performance is hindered by their writing apprehension (e.g., Zabihi, 2018). The present study’s data indicate instructor misbehaviors of antagonism and lectures indirectly influence students’ writing apprehension through the mediation of students’ burnout. As such, the more instructors show antagonism and engage in boring, disorganized lecturing behaviors, the higher their students’ writing apprehension. Without careful communication management, professors of writing-intensive courses whose primary role is to help students improve their writing skills may become the barrier that prevents students from improving their writing skills.","PeriodicalId":51521,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44919043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-13DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2022.2074303
M. Wanzer, Jennifer Czapla
ABSTRACT This study replicated and extended existing research on cancer survivors’ perceptions of helpful and unhelpful social support messages and sources. Forty-three participants with diverse cancer experiences were interviewed about their perceptions of helpful and unhelpful social support messages and sources. Participants recalled six categories of helpful (i.e., network, emotional, esteem, tangible, informational and unspecified) and five categories of unhelpful (i.e., network, emotional, esteem, tangible, informational) messages/sources received during and after cancer treatment. Helpful and unhelpful messages came from spouses, family members, friends, coworkers, healthcare providers and others. Patterns of meaningful message-source combinations are described. Participants recalled double the amount of helpful support messages than nonsupport messages, offering support for the positivity bias. Participants’ memories of helpful support messages and sources during treatment followed a consistent pattern; however, expectations and experiences of received social support after completion of cancer treatment were inconsistent and contradictory.
{"title":"“I looked it up and you’ll probably be fine”: cancer survivors’ perceptions of helpful and unhelpful support messages and sources","authors":"M. Wanzer, Jennifer Czapla","doi":"10.1080/01463373.2022.2074303","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2022.2074303","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study replicated and extended existing research on cancer survivors’ perceptions of helpful and unhelpful social support messages and sources. Forty-three participants with diverse cancer experiences were interviewed about their perceptions of helpful and unhelpful social support messages and sources. Participants recalled six categories of helpful (i.e., network, emotional, esteem, tangible, informational and unspecified) and five categories of unhelpful (i.e., network, emotional, esteem, tangible, informational) messages/sources received during and after cancer treatment. Helpful and unhelpful messages came from spouses, family members, friends, coworkers, healthcare providers and others. Patterns of meaningful message-source combinations are described. Participants recalled double the amount of helpful support messages than nonsupport messages, offering support for the positivity bias. Participants’ memories of helpful support messages and sources during treatment followed a consistent pattern; however, expectations and experiences of received social support after completion of cancer treatment were inconsistent and contradictory.","PeriodicalId":51521,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45001455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-10DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2022.2073827
Joshua H. Miller
ABSTRACT Actors often lose or gain weight to satisfy specific esthetics for their roles. When Matt Bomer reportedly lost forty pounds for The Normal Heart, public discourse went well beyond the typical explanation for the weight loss. That discourse explained Bomer’s body transformation as a part of his sacrificial duty to the gay community. Rhetors positioned Bomer’s weight loss as a sacrifice to educate, envision, and justify a united gay community that would continue to act to address the many challenges the community continued to face. Yet, the case of Bomer’s extreme weight loss also serves as a cautionary tale about how exclusionary norms, including whiteness, ageism, and ableism, circulate within rhetorical efforts to build and sustain community. The essay provides insights into the relationships among bodies, public memory, commemoration, and community.
演员经常减肥或增肥来满足他们角色的特定审美。当马特·波默(Matt Bomer)为《平常心》(The Normal Heart)减掉40磅时，公众的讨论远远超出了对他减肥的典型解释。这段话语将波默的身体转变解释为他对同性恋群体的牺牲责任的一部分。修辞学家将波默的减肥定位为一种牺牲，以教育、展望和证明一个团结的同性恋社区将继续采取行动，解决社区继续面临的许多挑战。然而，波默极端减肥的案例也警示我们，包括白人、年龄歧视和残疾歧视在内的排他规范是如何在建立和维持社区的修辞努力中传播的。这篇文章提供了对身体、公众记忆、纪念和社区之间关系的见解。
{"title":"The Normal Heart and “sickly” body: The case of Matthew Bomer’s extreme weight loss","authors":"Joshua H. Miller","doi":"10.1080/01463373.2022.2073827","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2022.2073827","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Actors often lose or gain weight to satisfy specific esthetics for their roles. When Matt Bomer reportedly lost forty pounds for The Normal Heart, public discourse went well beyond the typical explanation for the weight loss. That discourse explained Bomer’s body transformation as a part of his sacrificial duty to the gay community. Rhetors positioned Bomer’s weight loss as a sacrifice to educate, envision, and justify a united gay community that would continue to act to address the many challenges the community continued to face. Yet, the case of Bomer’s extreme weight loss also serves as a cautionary tale about how exclusionary norms, including whiteness, ageism, and ableism, circulate within rhetorical efforts to build and sustain community. The essay provides insights into the relationships among bodies, public memory, commemoration, and community.","PeriodicalId":51521,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44009911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-24DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2022.2054720
Alan K. Goodboy, San Bolkan, Matt Shin
ABSTRACT Relational turbulence theory (RTT) articulates processes that explain why spouses evaluate their marriages as chaotic. Specifically, RTT predicts that relational uncertainty biases cognitive appraisals about the marriage and that partner interference with daily routines heightens negative emotions toward the spouse, both of which, culminate in relational turbulence. Our study confirmed these theoretical processes in marriage. However, by integrating attachment theory predictions into RTT to further inform these processes, we demonstrated that RTT’s mechanisms were not the same for all spouses as they were dependent upon individuals’ attachment dimensions. Results of a latent profile analysis with distal outcomes indicated that RTT’s relationship parameters differed among spouses’ attachment styles, and results of conditional process models revealed that spouses who were higher in both attachment avoidance and anxiety experienced the most relational turbulence through theorized processes. Because RTT’s relationship parameters and processes differed by spouses’ attachment, our results speak to the importance of considering the moderation of RTT’s mechanistic pathways with particular emphasis on partners who vary in relationship security and interpersonal vulnerabilities
{"title":"Relational turbulence processes among avoidant and anxious spouses","authors":"Alan K. Goodboy, San Bolkan, Matt Shin","doi":"10.1080/01463373.2022.2054720","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2022.2054720","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Relational turbulence theory (RTT) articulates processes that explain why spouses evaluate their marriages as chaotic. Specifically, RTT predicts that relational uncertainty biases cognitive appraisals about the marriage and that partner interference with daily routines heightens negative emotions toward the spouse, both of which, culminate in relational turbulence. Our study confirmed these theoretical processes in marriage. However, by integrating attachment theory predictions into RTT to further inform these processes, we demonstrated that RTT’s mechanisms were not the same for all spouses as they were dependent upon individuals’ attachment dimensions. Results of a latent profile analysis with distal outcomes indicated that RTT’s relationship parameters differed among spouses’ attachment styles, and results of conditional process models revealed that spouses who were higher in both attachment avoidance and anxiety experienced the most relational turbulence through theorized processes. Because RTT’s relationship parameters and processes differed by spouses’ attachment, our results speak to the importance of considering the moderation of RTT’s mechanistic pathways with particular emphasis on partners who vary in relationship security and interpersonal vulnerabilities","PeriodicalId":51521,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43014178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-20DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2022.2053731
J. Crowley, Joshua R. Pederson
ABSTRACT Romantic partners of unemployed individuals uniquely experience stress due to spillover effects of unemployment and their role as primary support providers for the unemployed individual. The present study drew on the extended theoretical model of communal coping (TMCC) to examine a process of communal coping experienced by romantic partners (N = 285) of unemployed individuals, who completed an online survey. Analyses indicated that stress related to unemployment was negatively associated with a partner’s communal coping and communal coping was negatively associated with relational load. Perceived support from friends and family acted as a moderating influence on the relationships among stress, communal coping, and relational load. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.
{"title":"Relational load when a romantic partner is unemployed: the role of communal coping and social network support","authors":"J. Crowley, Joshua R. Pederson","doi":"10.1080/01463373.2022.2053731","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2022.2053731","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Romantic partners of unemployed individuals uniquely experience stress due to spillover effects of unemployment and their role as primary support providers for the unemployed individual. The present study drew on the extended theoretical model of communal coping (TMCC) to examine a process of communal coping experienced by romantic partners (N = 285) of unemployed individuals, who completed an online survey. Analyses indicated that stress related to unemployment was negatively associated with a partner’s communal coping and communal coping was negatively associated with relational load. Perceived support from friends and family acted as a moderating influence on the relationships among stress, communal coping, and relational load. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":51521,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48180410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-15DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2022.2051574
J. Apker
ABSTRACT This study explores how coping and social support assist students in managing communication stressors with two key academic groups─instructors and classmates─during COVID-19. Undergraduates (N = 70) provided open-ended responses of how they cope with stressful interactions. Grounded, iterative analysis reveals two themes. First, students use problem-focused coping by seeking informational and instrumental support from peers and instructors as well as acting independently to help themselves. These actions directly manage stress. Second, students use emotion-focused coping by seeking emotional support from peers and family members as well as engaging in self-soothing. These behaviors ease distressful feelings. Aligning with the research literature, findings show that emotional support improves stress appraisal and buffers students from stress whereas informational and instrumental support provides students with adaptive coping. Study results add new insights regarding the importance of seeking peer support to help manage COVID-19-related communication stress. Recommendations are offered for instructors teaching online as COVID-19 evolves.
{"title":"College student accounts of coping and social support during COVID-19 impacted learning","authors":"J. Apker","doi":"10.1080/01463373.2022.2051574","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2022.2051574","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study explores how coping and social support assist students in managing communication stressors with two key academic groups─instructors and classmates─during COVID-19. Undergraduates (N = 70) provided open-ended responses of how they cope with stressful interactions. Grounded, iterative analysis reveals two themes. First, students use problem-focused coping by seeking informational and instrumental support from peers and instructors as well as acting independently to help themselves. These actions directly manage stress. Second, students use emotion-focused coping by seeking emotional support from peers and family members as well as engaging in self-soothing. These behaviors ease distressful feelings. Aligning with the research literature, findings show that emotional support improves stress appraisal and buffers students from stress whereas informational and instrumental support provides students with adaptive coping. Study results add new insights regarding the importance of seeking peer support to help manage COVID-19-related communication stress. Recommendations are offered for instructors teaching online as COVID-19 evolves.","PeriodicalId":51521,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43266193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-15DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2022.2036212
Kristen L. Farris, Madeline Martinson, Jovana Andelkovic, Luke A. Dye
ABSTRACT Guided by predicted outcome value (POV) theory, we explore how instructors’ forms of address (FOA) during the first class day impact students’ POV judgments and their perceptions of instructors’ credibility and socio-communicative orientation. College students (N = 416) were randomly assigned to view one of six stimulus videos varying by FOA (e.g., “Doctor,” “Professor,” first name) and instructor biologic sex (e.g., male-presenting, female-presenting) before completing dependent measures. Results suggest female-presenting instructors are perceived to be less caring, albeit more assertive when referred to by “Doctor” or “Professor” compared to male-presenting instructors referred to by the same FOAs. Female-presenting instructors are also perceived to be more caring, yet less assertive when referred to by first name only in comparison to the male-presenting instructor referred to by the same FOA. The current study highlights the gendered expectations students have of instructors and the implications of instructor FOA during the first class day.
{"title":"Exploring students’ perceptions of instructor requests for forms of address and students’ appraisals of the instructor","authors":"Kristen L. Farris, Madeline Martinson, Jovana Andelkovic, Luke A. Dye","doi":"10.1080/01463373.2022.2036212","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2022.2036212","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Guided by predicted outcome value (POV) theory, we explore how instructors’ forms of address (FOA) during the first class day impact students’ POV judgments and their perceptions of instructors’ credibility and socio-communicative orientation. College students (N = 416) were randomly assigned to view one of six stimulus videos varying by FOA (e.g., “Doctor,” “Professor,” first name) and instructor biologic sex (e.g., male-presenting, female-presenting) before completing dependent measures. Results suggest female-presenting instructors are perceived to be less caring, albeit more assertive when referred to by “Doctor” or “Professor” compared to male-presenting instructors referred to by the same FOAs. Female-presenting instructors are also perceived to be more caring, yet less assertive when referred to by first name only in comparison to the male-presenting instructor referred to by the same FOA. The current study highlights the gendered expectations students have of instructors and the implications of instructor FOA during the first class day.","PeriodicalId":51521,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42609647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-14DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2022.2049330
Sean M. Horan, Rebecca M. Chory, Peter C. J. Raposo
ABSTRACT The research reported here responds to two calls for research: 1) to study organizational communication in religious settings, and 2) to extend the study of communication beyond WEIRD samples (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic). In answering those calls, we examined aggressive superior-subordinate communication in ecclesiastical occupations (EO) in the Roman Catholic Church in India. Consistent with prior research, superior verbal aggressiveness predicted negative subordinate responses and was a stronger predicter than superior argumentativeness, which predicted positive subordinate responses. These patterns, however, were qualified by the interactions observed. Specifically, superior aggressive communication was a stronger predictor of responses among priests than sisters, and it predicted more positive job outcomes for priests (e.g., higher job satisfaction), but more negative ones for sisters (e.g., lower job satisfaction). Furthermore, the positive verbal aggressiveness-occupational outcomes relationships run counter to US-based aggressive communication theory and empirical research, as does the positive correlation observed between argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness. Results of this research underscore the importance of testing the generalizability of communication knowledge originating from WEIRD samples to non-WEIRD populations.
{"title":"Aggressive Superior-Subordinate Communication as a Predictor of Occupational Outcomes among Roman Catholic Sisters and Priests in India","authors":"Sean M. Horan, Rebecca M. Chory, Peter C. J. Raposo","doi":"10.1080/01463373.2022.2049330","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2022.2049330","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The research reported here responds to two calls for research: 1) to study organizational communication in religious settings, and 2) to extend the study of communication beyond WEIRD samples (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic). In answering those calls, we examined aggressive superior-subordinate communication in ecclesiastical occupations (EO) in the Roman Catholic Church in India. Consistent with prior research, superior verbal aggressiveness predicted negative subordinate responses and was a stronger predicter than superior argumentativeness, which predicted positive subordinate responses. These patterns, however, were qualified by the interactions observed. Specifically, superior aggressive communication was a stronger predictor of responses among priests than sisters, and it predicted more positive job outcomes for priests (e.g., higher job satisfaction), but more negative ones for sisters (e.g., lower job satisfaction). Furthermore, the positive verbal aggressiveness-occupational outcomes relationships run counter to US-based aggressive communication theory and empirical research, as does the positive correlation observed between argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness. Results of this research underscore the importance of testing the generalizability of communication knowledge originating from WEIRD samples to non-WEIRD populations.","PeriodicalId":51521,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45844714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-01DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2022.2046622
Katie Kassler, Amorette Hinderaker
ABSTRACT Evangelical Christian groups have forwarded ex-gay rhetorics since the 1970s, shaping grand narratives of LGBTQIA+ exclusion within Christian spaces. Using a dialectic approach to organizational resistance, the current study traces the textual discursive interplay between narratives of the ex-gay Christian organization, CHANGED, and of the parody pro-LGBTQIA+ Christian organization UNCHANGED to uncover how LGBTQIA+ Christians resist exclusionary heteronormative grand narratives. We conducted a microstoria analysis of 108 personal narratives from both groups and found four emergent themes central to UNCHANGED members’ resistance processes: (a) narrated identity dissonance, (b) proclamation of God’s Truth, (c) mechanisms for resistance, and (d) rewards for living out God’s Truth. This study advances two important theoretical considerations: the utility of parody as an online resistance strategy and a reconceptualization of resistance as chronic (i.e., organizational resisting). Further implications, limitations, and future directions for research are discussed.
{"title":"“To God, I Was Visible, and I Was Beautiful”: Parody and religious organizational resisting within (UN)CHANGED online narratives","authors":"Katie Kassler, Amorette Hinderaker","doi":"10.1080/01463373.2022.2046622","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2022.2046622","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Evangelical Christian groups have forwarded ex-gay rhetorics since the 1970s, shaping grand narratives of LGBTQIA+ exclusion within Christian spaces. Using a dialectic approach to organizational resistance, the current study traces the textual discursive interplay between narratives of the ex-gay Christian organization, CHANGED, and of the parody pro-LGBTQIA+ Christian organization UNCHANGED to uncover how LGBTQIA+ Christians resist exclusionary heteronormative grand narratives. We conducted a microstoria analysis of 108 personal narratives from both groups and found four emergent themes central to UNCHANGED members’ resistance processes: (a) narrated identity dissonance, (b) proclamation of God’s Truth, (c) mechanisms for resistance, and (d) rewards for living out God’s Truth. This study advances two important theoretical considerations: the utility of parody as an online resistance strategy and a reconceptualization of resistance as chronic (i.e., organizational resisting). Further implications, limitations, and future directions for research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":51521,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59110120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-11DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2022.2036213
Lihong Quan, Sungeun Chung, Youllee Kim, Jiyeon So
ABSTRACT Success stories are often used to promote health behaviors. This study examined how different features of others’ success stories about achieving an exercise goal influence observers’ intentions to exercise. The specific factors examined were success stories’ model similarity (similar vs. underdog model) and success attribution type (internal vs. external attribution message) on individuals’ expectations of their success and intentions to exercise. The results of an online experiment (N = 282) showed that success stories of similar models led to greater success expectancy than those of underdog models through the increased perception of model similarity. Further, success stories focusing on external – as opposed to internal – attribution resulted in greater success expectancy through increased external attribution of models’ success. Success expectancy then increased intention to exercise. This study concludes by discussing the theoretical implications for social cognitive theory and attribution theory as well as practical implications for designing health promotion messages.
{"title":"Is a success story of an underdog more powerful than one of a similar other? examining effects of model similarity and success attribution on intention to exercise","authors":"Lihong Quan, Sungeun Chung, Youllee Kim, Jiyeon So","doi":"10.1080/01463373.2022.2036213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2022.2036213","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Success stories are often used to promote health behaviors. This study examined how different features of others’ success stories about achieving an exercise goal influence observers’ intentions to exercise. The specific factors examined were success stories’ model similarity (similar vs. underdog model) and success attribution type (internal vs. external attribution message) on individuals’ expectations of their success and intentions to exercise. The results of an online experiment (N = 282) showed that success stories of similar models led to greater success expectancy than those of underdog models through the increased perception of model similarity. Further, success stories focusing on external – as opposed to internal – attribution resulted in greater success expectancy through increased external attribution of models’ success. Success expectancy then increased intention to exercise. This study concludes by discussing the theoretical implications for social cognitive theory and attribution theory as well as practical implications for designing health promotion messages.","PeriodicalId":51521,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2022-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41895647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：