首页 > 最新文献

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale最新文献

英文 中文
Effects of valence and list composition on memory predictions, performance, and beliefs. 效价和表组成对记忆预测、表现和信念的影响。
IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-02-09 DOI: 10.1037/cep0000397
Molly B MacMillan, Landon A Churchill, Kathleen L Hourihan

It is generally well known that emotion can benefit memory; however, much less is known about how emotion influences metamemory. The present study examined how list composition and emotion influence individuals' metamnemonic judgements and performance in a free recall task. Participants studied lists of words that varied in emotional valence and made immediate judgements of learning after each word. Valence was manipulated in a mixed-list design in Experiment 1, a pure-list design in Experiment 2, and in a mixed- versus pure-list design in Experiment 4; arousal was held constant. We expected that the relative influence of emotion on metamemory would depend on participants' beliefs about how emotion influences memory and that these beliefs would be more salient in a mixed-list than pure-list design. Consistent with this, emotional words were given higher judgements of learnings than neutral words in Experiments 1 and 4, but not in Experiment 2. Posttest questionnaires (Experiments 1 and 2) and data collected from a naïve participant sample (Experiment 3) indicated that participants believed that emotional words are more memorable than nonemotional words. These results suggest that list structure influenced the degree to which judgements of learnings were responsive to emotional content. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

众所周知,情绪有利于记忆;然而,人们对情绪如何影响元记忆知之甚少。本研究考察了列表组成和情绪如何影响个体在自由回忆任务中的元记忆判断和表现。参与者研究了一系列在情绪效价上有所不同的单词,并在每个单词之后立即做出学习效果的判断。实验1采用混合表设计,实验2采用纯表设计,实验4采用混合表与纯表设计;兴奋保持不变。我们预期情绪对元记忆的相对影响将取决于参与者对情绪如何影响记忆的信念,并且这些信念在混合列表设计中比纯列表设计中更为突出。与此一致的是,在实验1和实验4中,情绪词的学习判断高于中性词,而在实验2中则没有。后测问卷(实验1和2)和从naïve参与者样本(实验3)收集的数据表明,参与者认为情绪词汇比非情绪词汇更容易被记住。这些结果表明,列表结构影响学习判断对情绪内容的反应程度。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Effects of valence and list composition on memory predictions, performance, and beliefs.","authors":"Molly B MacMillan, Landon A Churchill, Kathleen L Hourihan","doi":"10.1037/cep0000397","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000397","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is generally well known that emotion can benefit memory; however, much less is known about how emotion influences metamemory. The present study examined how list composition and emotion influence individuals' metamnemonic judgements and performance in a free recall task. Participants studied lists of words that varied in emotional valence and made immediate judgements of learning after each word. Valence was manipulated in a mixed-list design in Experiment 1, a pure-list design in Experiment 2, and in a mixed- versus pure-list design in Experiment 4; arousal was held constant. We expected that the relative influence of emotion on metamemory would depend on participants' beliefs about how emotion influences memory and that these beliefs would be more salient in a mixed-list than pure-list design. Consistent with this, emotional words were given higher judgements of learnings than neutral words in Experiments 1 and 4, but not in Experiment 2. Posttest questionnaires (Experiments 1 and 2) and data collected from a naïve participant sample (Experiment 3) indicated that participants believed that emotional words are more memorable than nonemotional words. These results suggest that list structure influenced the degree to which judgements of learnings were responsive to emotional content. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51529,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146144512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emoji smiles do not convey sincerity like human smiles: Insights from the emotion as social information model. 表情符号微笑不像人类微笑那样传达真诚:从情感作为社会信息模型的洞察。
IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1037/cep0000394
Marie-Pier Mazerolle, Adèle Gallant, Alex Samuel LeBlanc, Annie Roy-Charland

Research on smile perception indicates that smiles containing a cheek raiser tend to be judged as happier, more sincere, and more authentic than those without this cue. However, while this is well established for human smiles, less is known about how such cues are perceived in emojis. Guided by the emotions as social information (EASI) model, which posits that emotional expressions influence observers through inferential and affective pathways, this study examined judgements of sincerity for enjoyment and nonenjoyment smiles produced by human and emoji encoders. In Experiment 1, participants judged whether smiles (human or emoji) were "really happy" or "not really happy." Both stimulus types included smiles that varied in cues of sincerity (presence or absence of the cheek raiser). In Experiment 2, the same task was repeated with open or closed mouth variations. Participants identified human enjoyment smiles as "really happy" more often than nonenjoyment smiles, whereas emojis were rated as "really happy" regardless of the sincerity cue. Closed mouth smiles were judged as less happy than open mouth smiles, and judgements were faster for emojis than for human faces. These findings suggest that, in line with the EASI model, emoji-based expressions may elicit affective rather than inferential processing, highlighting their limited equivalence to human smiles in digital communication. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

对微笑感知的研究表明,包含脸颊抬起的微笑往往被认为比没有这个暗示的微笑更快乐、更真诚、更真实。然而,尽管这在人类的微笑中已经得到了证实,但人们对表情符号中如何感知这些暗示却知之甚少。在情绪作为社会信息(EASI)模型的指导下,该模型假设情绪表达通过推理和情感途径影响观察者,本研究检验了人类和表情符号编码器对快乐微笑和非快乐微笑的诚意判断。在实验1中,参与者判断微笑(人类或表情符号)是“真的开心”还是“不开心”。两种刺激类型都包括不同的微笑,暗示着真诚(是否抬起脸颊)。在实验2中,同样的任务被重复,嘴巴张开或闭上的变化。参与者认为,人们开心的微笑比不开心的微笑更能代表“真的快乐”,而表情符号则被认为是“真的快乐”,而不管表情符号是否真诚。闭着嘴笑被认为比张开嘴笑更不快乐,表情符号的判断速度比人脸快。这些发现表明,与EASI模型一致,基于表情符号的表达可能会引发情感处理,而不是推理处理,突出了它们在数字交流中与人类微笑的有限等价性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Emoji smiles do not convey sincerity like human smiles: Insights from the emotion as social information model.","authors":"Marie-Pier Mazerolle, Adèle Gallant, Alex Samuel LeBlanc, Annie Roy-Charland","doi":"10.1037/cep0000394","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000394","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on smile perception indicates that smiles containing a cheek raiser tend to be judged as happier, more sincere, and more authentic than those without this cue. However, while this is well established for human smiles, less is known about how such cues are perceived in emojis. Guided by the emotions as social information (EASI) model, which posits that emotional expressions influence observers through inferential and affective pathways, this study examined judgements of sincerity for enjoyment and nonenjoyment smiles produced by human and emoji encoders. In Experiment 1, participants judged whether smiles (human or emoji) were \"really happy\" or \"not really happy.\" Both stimulus types included smiles that varied in cues of sincerity (presence or absence of the cheek raiser). In Experiment 2, the same task was repeated with open or closed mouth variations. Participants identified human enjoyment smiles as \"really happy\" more often than nonenjoyment smiles, whereas emojis were rated as \"really happy\" regardless of the sincerity cue. Closed mouth smiles were judged as less happy than open mouth smiles, and judgements were faster for emojis than for human faces. These findings suggest that, in line with the EASI model, emoji-based expressions may elicit affective rather than inferential processing, highlighting their limited equivalence to human smiles in digital communication. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51529,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146127417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differential response to cognitive stimulation in moderate versus moderately severe Alzheimer's disease. 中度与中重度阿尔茨海默病对认知刺激的差异反应
IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1037/cep0000395
Susana I Justo-Henriques, Rosa C Gomes Silva, Janessa O Carvalho, Enrique Pérez-Sáez, Ricardo M V de São João, Oscar Ribeiro

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by impairments across several neurocognitive domains, particularly memory and executive function. The study explored the effectiveness of an individual cognitive stimulation (iCS) program on cognitive outcomes in older adults with moderate to moderately severe AD. A multicentre randomized controlled trial was conducted with 80 Portuguese older adults (Mage: 83.0 ± 7.1 years) with AD. Participants were randomly assigned to either iCS (n = 39; 49%) or treatment as usual (n = 41; 51%). Alzheimer's Disease Severity (ADS) categorized two groups based on Mini-Mental State Examination score: 10-14 in the ADS moderately severe group and 15-20 in the ADS moderate group. In participants with moderate AD, iCS led to significant improvements in memory-related outcomes (particularly Memory Assessment Test) and a trend toward improvement in global cognition. In contrast, no significant effects were observed in participants with moderately severe AD. Meta-analytic comparisons and meta-regression confirmed a significant difference in intervention effectiveness between severity levels. iCS was significantly more effective in individuals with moderate AD than in those with moderately severe AD. This difference in responsiveness between severity levels was statistically confirmed (Q = 11.29, p < .001). iCS was effective in enhancing memory in individuals with moderate AD, with additional indications of global cognitive benefit. However, no meaningful effects were observed in participants with moderately severe impairment, suggesting diminished responsiveness to iCS as disease severity increases. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

阿尔茨海默病(AD)的特点是在多个神经认知领域受损,特别是记忆和执行功能。该研究探讨了个体认知刺激(iCS)计划对中重度AD老年人认知结果的有效性。对80名葡萄牙老年AD患者(年龄:83.0±7.1岁)进行了一项多中心随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到ic组(n = 39; 49%)或正常治疗组(n = 41; 51%)。阿尔茨海默病严重程度(ADS)根据迷你精神状态检查得分分为两组:中度重度ad组为10-14分,中度ad组为15-20分。在中度AD的参与者中,ic导致记忆相关结果(特别是记忆评估测试)的显着改善,并有改善整体认知的趋势。相比之下,在中度重度AD患者中没有观察到明显的影响。meta分析比较和meta回归证实了严重程度之间干预效果的显著差异。ic在中度AD患者中比在中度重度AD患者中更有效。严重程度之间的反应性差异在统计学上得到证实(Q = 11.29, p < 0.001)。ic能有效增强中度AD患者的记忆,并具有整体认知益处。然而,在中度严重损伤的参与者中没有观察到有意义的影响,这表明随着疾病严重程度的增加,对ic的反应性降低。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Differential response to cognitive stimulation in moderate versus moderately severe Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Susana I Justo-Henriques, Rosa C Gomes Silva, Janessa O Carvalho, Enrique Pérez-Sáez, Ricardo M V de São João, Oscar Ribeiro","doi":"10.1037/cep0000395","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000395","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by impairments across several neurocognitive domains, particularly memory and executive function. The study explored the effectiveness of an individual cognitive stimulation (iCS) program on cognitive outcomes in older adults with moderate to moderately severe AD. A multicentre randomized controlled trial was conducted with 80 Portuguese older adults (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub>: 83.0 ± 7.1 years) with AD. Participants were randomly assigned to either iCS (<i>n</i> = 39; 49%) or treatment as usual (<i>n</i> = 41; 51%). Alzheimer's Disease Severity (ADS) categorized two groups based on Mini-Mental State Examination score: 10-14 in the <i>ADS moderately severe</i> group and 15-20 in the ADS moderate group. In participants with moderate AD, iCS led to significant improvements in memory-related outcomes (particularly Memory Assessment Test) and a trend toward improvement in global cognition. In contrast, no significant effects were observed in participants with moderately severe AD. Meta-analytic comparisons and meta-regression confirmed a significant difference in intervention effectiveness between severity levels. iCS was significantly more effective in individuals with moderate AD than in those with moderately severe AD. This difference in responsiveness between severity levels was statistically confirmed (<i>Q</i> = 11.29, <i>p</i> < .001). iCS was effective in enhancing memory in individuals with moderate AD, with additional indications of global cognitive benefit. However, no meaningful effects were observed in participants with moderately severe impairment, suggesting diminished responsiveness to iCS as disease severity increases. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51529,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146127388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A French Canadian adaptation and validation of the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire and Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire. 《视觉意象生动性问卷》和《普利茅斯感觉意象问卷》的法加改编与验证。
IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.1037/cep0000392
Catherine Landry, Laurence Lessard, Jeffrey Saint-Louis, Frédéric Gosselin, Ian Charest, Vincent Taschereau-Dumouchel, Guillaume T Vallet

Mental imagery plays a central role in various cognitive processes and is increasingly investigated in cognitive science. Yet standardized tools for its assessment in French-speaking populations remain scarce. This study examined the psychometric properties of two widely used self-report instruments of mental imagery within the French Canadian population: the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ) and the Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire (Psi-Q)-here termed VVIQ-Québec (QC) and Psiq-QC. A total of 328 adults completed the VVIQ-QC and Psiq-QC, with a randomly selected subsample (n = 73) repeating the assessment 1 month later. Exploratory factor analysis of the VVIQ-QC (eyes-open) revealed, as in the original VVIQ, distinct factors corresponding to each prompt cluster (i.e., relative, sunrise, landscape, and storefront). The Psiq-QC yielded a six-factor solution after excluding the Body modality, diverging from the original seven-factor model. Both instruments showed strong internal consistency, temporal stability, and convergent validity. No significant effects of age, sex, or education were observed on imagery scores. These findings provide the first validated French Canadian versions of the VVIQ and Psi-Q, available via the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/wuhja, offering reliable tools for both research and clinical applications. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

心理意象在各种认知过程中起着核心作用,在认知科学中受到越来越多的研究。然而,在讲法语的人群中进行评估的标准化工具仍然很少。本研究考察了法裔加拿大人广泛使用的两种心理意象自我报告工具的心理测量特性:视觉意象生动度问卷(VVIQ)和普利茅斯感觉意象问卷(Psi-Q)——这里称为VVIQ- qu (QC)和Psiq-QC。共有328名成年人完成了VVIQ-QC和Psiq-QC,随机抽取73名样本在1个月后重复评估。对VVIQ- qc (eyes-open)的探索性因子分析显示,与最初的VVIQ一样,每个提示簇(即相对、日出、景观和店面)对应的因子是不同的。Psiq-QC在排除Body模态后产生了六因素解决方案,偏离了原来的七因素模型。两种工具均表现出较强的内部一致性、时间稳定性和收敛效度。没有观察到年龄、性别或教育对意象得分的显著影响。这些发现提供了第一个经过验证的法语加拿大版本的VVIQ和Psi-Q,可通过https://osf.io/wuhja的开放科学框架获得,为研究和临床应用提供了可靠的工具。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"A French Canadian adaptation and validation of the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire and Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire.","authors":"Catherine Landry, Laurence Lessard, Jeffrey Saint-Louis, Frédéric Gosselin, Ian Charest, Vincent Taschereau-Dumouchel, Guillaume T Vallet","doi":"10.1037/cep0000392","DOIUrl":"10.1037/cep0000392","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mental imagery plays a central role in various cognitive processes and is increasingly investigated in cognitive science. Yet standardized tools for its assessment in French-speaking populations remain scarce. This study examined the psychometric properties of two widely used self-report instruments of mental imagery within the French Canadian population: the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ) and the Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire (Psi-Q)-here termed VVIQ-Québec (QC) and Psiq-QC. A total of 328 adults completed the VVIQ-QC and Psiq-QC, with a randomly selected subsample (<i>n</i> = 73) repeating the assessment 1 month later. Exploratory factor analysis of the VVIQ-QC (eyes-open) revealed, as in the original VVIQ, distinct factors corresponding to each prompt cluster (i.e., relative, sunrise, landscape, and storefront). The Psiq-QC yielded a six-factor solution after excluding the <i>Body</i> modality, diverging from the original seven-factor model. Both instruments showed strong internal consistency, temporal stability, and convergent validity. No significant effects of age, sex, or education were observed on imagery scores. These findings provide the first validated French Canadian versions of the VVIQ and Psi-Q, available via the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/wuhja, offering reliable tools for both research and clinical applications. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51529,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145758189","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A failure of the interocular suppression paradigm to assess sexual preferences in two studies. 在两项研究中,眼间抑制范式未能评估性偏好。
IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-08 DOI: 10.1037/cep0000374
Marie-Andrée Légère, Martin L Lalumière, Megan L Sawatsky, J Gray, D B Krupp

Several methods have been developed to assess sexual preferences in men and women. Direct instruments (e.g., plethysmography, questionnaires) are the most widely used, but they have notable shortcomings, including a lack of response specificity in certain groups and a risk of false responding. Indirect instruments (e.g., reaction time), where preferences are assessed unobtrusively, may overcome these limitations and could therefore be used to measure sexual preferences more effectively. One promising instrument, published by Jiang et al. (2006), used an ocular suppression paradigm that exposed participants to sexual images while simultaneously masking them from conscious perception. Jiang et al. (2006) found that these "invisible" images attracted visual attention when they matched the participants' sexual preferences for nude male or female images and, in the case of heterosexual men, repelled attention when they did not match the participants' preferences. Here, we attempt to replicate these findings over two studies. In the first experiment, using a stereoscopic apparatus with 22 men and 25 women and a validation test (time spent rating the same nude images), we found no attentional attraction to or repulsion of invisible images even though the rating times for the same images were related to participants' sexual orientation. In the second experiment, with 32 men, we replaced the stereoscopic apparatus with a virtual reality headset, offering better control over stimulus delivery. Again, the invisible images produced no attentional attraction or repulsion. Our results suggest that the interocular suppression paradigm is not an effective method for assessing sexual preferences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

已经开发了几种方法来评估男性和女性的性偏好。直接工具(例如,人口密度描记、问卷调查)是最广泛使用的,但它们有明显的缺点,包括在某些群体中缺乏反应特异性和存在错误反应的风险。间接工具(例如,反应时间),在不引人注目的情况下评估偏好,可能克服这些限制,因此可以更有效地用于测量性偏好。Jiang等人(2006)发表的一种很有前途的工具,使用了一种眼抑制范式,让参与者暴露在性图像面前,同时掩盖他们的意识感知。Jiang等人(2006)发现,当这些“看不见的”图像与参与者对裸体男性或女性图像的性偏好相匹配时,它们会吸引视觉注意力,而对于异性恋男性来说,当它们与参与者的偏好不匹配时,它们会排斥注意力。在这里,我们试图在两个研究中重复这些发现。在第一个实验中,我们使用了一个有22名男性和25名女性的立体装置,并进行了验证测试(花时间对相同的裸体图像进行评级),我们发现,即使对相同图像的评级时间与参与者的性取向有关,我们也没有发现对看不见的图像的注意力吸引或排斥。在第二个实验中,我们用虚拟现实耳机代替了立体设备,从而更好地控制刺激的传递。同样,这些看不见的图像不会引起注意力的吸引或排斥。我们的研究结果表明,眼间抑制范式不是评估性偏好的有效方法。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"A failure of the interocular suppression paradigm to assess sexual preferences in two studies.","authors":"Marie-Andrée Légère, Martin L Lalumière, Megan L Sawatsky, J Gray, D B Krupp","doi":"10.1037/cep0000374","DOIUrl":"10.1037/cep0000374","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several methods have been developed to assess sexual preferences in men and women. Direct instruments (e.g., plethysmography, questionnaires) are the most widely used, but they have notable shortcomings, including a lack of response specificity in certain groups and a risk of false responding. Indirect instruments (e.g., reaction time), where preferences are assessed unobtrusively, may overcome these limitations and could therefore be used to measure sexual preferences more effectively. One promising instrument, published by Jiang et al. (2006), used an ocular suppression paradigm that exposed participants to sexual images while simultaneously masking them from conscious perception. Jiang et al. (2006) found that these \"invisible\" images attracted visual attention when they matched the participants' sexual preferences for nude male or female images and, in the case of heterosexual men, repelled attention when they did not match the participants' preferences. Here, we attempt to replicate these findings over two studies. In the first experiment, using a stereoscopic apparatus with 22 men and 25 women and a validation test (time spent rating the same nude images), we found no attentional attraction to or repulsion of invisible images even though the rating times for the same images were related to participants' sexual orientation. In the second experiment, with 32 men, we replaced the stereoscopic apparatus with a virtual reality headset, offering better control over stimulus delivery. Again, the invisible images produced no attentional attraction or repulsion. Our results suggest that the interocular suppression paradigm is not an effective method for assessing sexual preferences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51529,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale","volume":" ","pages":"317-328"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144005049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Open science: My insights into data sharing, preregistration, and replication. 开放科学:我对数据共享、预注册和复制的见解。
IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1037/cep0000386
Sara A Hart

After a decade of implementing open science practices as a principal investigator, mentor, data repository founder, and editor-in-chief, I have learned that the question is not whether researchers should adopt these practices but how to adapt them meaningfully. This commentary, based on a talk given at the 2024 Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science conference, argues for two key principles: First, open science implementation must be context-dependent rather than one-size-fits-all, and second, practical research realities require flexible approaches to idealized policies. Through personal examples, from my evolution with preregistration from "recipe" to "guide" during COVID-19 research to challenges with Registered Reports using existing data sets, I show how open science practices work best when researchers approach them as evolving tools rather than rigid rules. I also discuss field-specific differences in open science uptake between psychology and education and the importance of equity considerations in implementation. The commentary concludes with concrete recommendations for researchers and journals, emphasizing that sustainable open science requires meeting researchers where they are while maintaining transparency and scientific rigour. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

在作为首席研究员、导师、数据存储库创始人和总编辑实施开放科学实践十年之后,我了解到问题不在于研究人员是否应该采用这些实践,而在于如何有意义地调整它们。这篇评论基于在2024年加拿大大脑、行为和认知科学学会会议上的一次演讲,提出了两个关键原则:第一,开放科学的实施必须依赖于环境,而不是一刀切;第二,实际的研究现实需要灵活的方法来实现理想化的政策。通过个人的例子,从我在COVID-19研究期间从“配方”到“指南”的预注册演变,到使用现有数据集的注册报告的挑战,我展示了当研究人员将开放科学实践作为不断发展的工具而不是严格的规则时,它们是如何发挥最佳作用的。我还讨论了心理学和教育在开放科学吸收方面的具体领域差异,以及在实施中公平考虑的重要性。该评论总结了对研究人员和期刊的具体建议,强调可持续的开放科学需要在保持透明度和科学严谨性的同时满足研究人员的需要。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Open science: My insights into data sharing, preregistration, and replication.","authors":"Sara A Hart","doi":"10.1037/cep0000386","DOIUrl":"10.1037/cep0000386","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After a decade of implementing open science practices as a principal investigator, mentor, data repository founder, and editor-in-chief, I have learned that the question is not whether researchers should adopt these practices but how to adapt them meaningfully. This commentary, based on a talk given at the 2024 Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science conference, argues for two key principles: First, open science implementation must be context-dependent rather than one-size-fits-all, and second, practical research realities require flexible approaches to idealized policies. Through personal examples, from my evolution with preregistration from \"recipe\" to \"guide\" during COVID-19 research to challenges with Registered Reports using existing data sets, I show how open science practices work best when researchers approach them as evolving tools rather than rigid rules. I also discuss field-specific differences in open science uptake between psychology and education and the importance of equity considerations in implementation. The commentary concludes with concrete recommendations for researchers and journals, emphasizing that sustainable open science requires meeting researchers where they are while maintaining transparency and scientific rigour. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51529,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale","volume":"79 4","pages":"311-316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12700343/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145745691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Crossmodal and multisensory inhibition of return (IOR) and IOR-like inhibitory effects. 跨模式和多感觉返回抑制(IOR)和IOR样抑制效应。
IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1037/cep0000389
Charles Spence

In this narrative theoretical review, I take a closer look at the last 40 years of research on the cuing of attention and the often-related inhibition of return in the spatial senses of vision, audition, and touch. A distinction is made between perceptual versus response-based facilitation and inhibition in these two putatively related phenomena. Ray Klein has long been interested in the phenomenon of inhibition of return, though mostly from a unisensory visual perspective. This review highlights how examining these attentional and response-related phenomena outside of the visual modality (e.g., in audition and in touch), as well as crossmodally, and in a multisensory context, has helped to further our understanding of both empirical phenomena. The putative existence of attentional orienting and inhibition of return-like inhibitory phenomena outside of the spatial domain, as when attentional selection relates to a specific stimulus dimension (such as hue), semantic category, or even sensory modality, is also discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

在这篇叙事理论综述中,我仔细研究了近40年来关于注意力提示和视觉、听觉和触觉等空间感官中经常相关的返回抑制的研究。在这两种假定相关的现象中,知觉与反应为基础的促进和抑制是有区别的。雷·克莱因(Ray Klein)长期以来一直对回归抑制现象感兴趣,尽管主要是从感官视觉的角度出发。这篇综述强调了如何在视觉模态之外(例如,在听觉和触觉中)以及跨模态和多感官环境中检查这些注意力和反应相关现象,有助于我们进一步理解这两种经验现象。在空间域之外,当注意选择与特定刺激维度(如色调)、语义范畴或甚至感觉模态相关时,注意定向和抑制回归样抑制现象的假定存在也被讨论。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Crossmodal and multisensory inhibition of return (IOR) and IOR-like inhibitory effects.","authors":"Charles Spence","doi":"10.1037/cep0000389","DOIUrl":"10.1037/cep0000389","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this narrative theoretical review, I take a closer look at the last 40 years of research on the cuing of attention and the often-related inhibition of return in the spatial senses of vision, audition, and touch. A distinction is made between perceptual versus response-based facilitation and inhibition in these two putatively related phenomena. Ray Klein has long been interested in the phenomenon of inhibition of return, though mostly from a unisensory visual perspective. This review highlights how examining these attentional and response-related phenomena outside of the visual modality (e.g., in audition and in touch), as well as crossmodally, and in a multisensory context, has helped to further our understanding of both empirical phenomena. The putative existence of attentional orienting and inhibition of return-like inhibitory phenomena outside of the spatial domain, as when attentional selection relates to a specific stimulus dimension (such as hue), semantic category, or even sensory modality, is also discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51529,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145656359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fostering transparency and reproducibility in psychological science. 促进心理科学的透明度和可重复性。
IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-09 DOI: 10.1037/cep0000381
D Stephen Lindsay

Psychological science is hard. This short article focuses on two issues. One has to do with the importance of understanding statistical power and how post hoc data explorations and selective reporting can lead to exaggerated estimates of the size of effects and the strength of relationships (which in turn contribute to replication failures). The other topic is tools research psychologists can use to improve the reproducibility of their procedures and analyses. The article closes with a comment on the deeper challenge of improving the usefulness and testability of theories in psychology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

心理科学很难。这篇短文主要关注两个问题。一个是理解统计能力的重要性,以及事后数据探索和选择性报告如何导致对效应大小和关系强度的夸大估计(这反过来又导致了复制失败)。另一个主题是研究心理学家可以用来提高他们的程序和分析的可重复性的工具。文章最后评论了提高心理学理论的有用性和可测试性所面临的更深层次的挑战。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Fostering transparency and reproducibility in psychological science.","authors":"D Stephen Lindsay","doi":"10.1037/cep0000381","DOIUrl":"10.1037/cep0000381","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychological science is hard. This short article focuses on two issues. One has to do with the importance of understanding statistical power and how post hoc data explorations and selective reporting can lead to exaggerated estimates of the size of effects and the strength of relationships (which in turn contribute to replication failures). The other topic is tools research psychologists can use to improve the reproducibility of their procedures and analyses. The article closes with a comment on the deeper challenge of improving the usefulness and testability of theories in psychology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51529,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale","volume":" ","pages":"307-310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144250841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Agentic aspects of attentional disengagement. 注意力脱离的主观层面。
IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI: 10.1037/cep0000377
Daniel Smilek, Samantha Ayers-Glassey, Melissa van Dijk-Allen, Adrian Berk Safati

Moments of inattention are commonly experienced by most people in everyday life. While some of these inattentive episodes occur inadvertently, others are the result of an individual's choices. Here we characterize the aspects of inattention over which individuals have agency, with a specific consideration of the inattentive state of mind wandering (i.e., off-task thought). Our research on this topic has revealed several general principles that underpin people's agency over their inattention to a task at hand. First, people have nuanced awareness of their inattentive episodes, reporting various degrees of both spontaneous and deliberate moments of inattention, even during tasks in which they agree to be attentive. Second, spontaneous and deliberate bouts of attentional disengagement have distinct correlates and underlying mechanisms. Third, people have considerable control over the degree of their inattention and are able to regulate it skillfully on command and strategically in response to situational demands. Fourth, people have reliable memories of prior moment-to-moment changes in their inattention. And finally, individuals are able to accurately forecast how their inattention might change in an upcoming task. These principles suggest an agentic view of inattention, according to which people are imperfect but intelligent managers of their attentional engagement and disengagement. We discuss the wide-ranging implications of this view on prior and future studies of attentional disengagement, the interpretability of performance in cognitive tasks, and strategies that can be implemented to reduce inattention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

大多数人在日常生活中都经常经历注意力不集中的时刻。虽然这些不注意的情节有些是无意中发生的,但有些是个人选择的结果。在这里,我们描述了个体具有能动性的注意力不集中的各个方面,并特别考虑了注意力不集中状态的走神(即,任务外思维)。我们对这个话题的研究揭示了一些普遍的原则,这些原则支撑着人们对手头任务的忽视。首先,人们对自己的注意力不集中有细微的意识,报告了不同程度的自发和故意的注意力不集中时刻,即使是在他们同意集中注意力的任务中。第二,自发和故意的注意力脱离有不同的关联和潜在机制。第三,人们对自己注意力不集中的程度有相当大的控制能力,并能够根据情境需求,根据命令和策略巧妙地加以调节。第四,人们对之前注意力不集中的时刻变化有可靠的记忆。最后,个体能够准确预测他们的注意力不集中在即将到来的任务中可能会发生什么变化。这些原则提出了一种关于注意力不集中的主观观点,根据这种观点,人们是不完美的,但他们是注意力投入和脱离注意力的聪明管理者。我们讨论了这一观点对注意力脱离、认知任务中表现的可解释性以及减少注意力不集中的策略的先前和未来研究的广泛影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Agentic aspects of attentional disengagement.","authors":"Daniel Smilek, Samantha Ayers-Glassey, Melissa van Dijk-Allen, Adrian Berk Safati","doi":"10.1037/cep0000377","DOIUrl":"10.1037/cep0000377","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Moments of inattention are commonly experienced by most people in everyday life. While some of these inattentive episodes occur inadvertently, others are the result of an individual's choices. Here we characterize the aspects of inattention over which individuals have agency, with a specific consideration of the inattentive state of mind wandering (i.e., off-task thought). Our research on this topic has revealed several general principles that underpin people's agency over their inattention to a task at hand. First, people have nuanced awareness of their inattentive episodes, reporting various degrees of both spontaneous and deliberate moments of inattention, even during tasks in which they agree to be attentive. Second, spontaneous and deliberate bouts of attentional disengagement have distinct correlates and underlying mechanisms. Third, people have considerable control over the degree of their inattention and are able to regulate it skillfully on command and strategically in response to situational demands. Fourth, people have reliable memories of prior moment-to-moment changes in their inattention. And finally, individuals are able to accurately forecast how their inattention might change in an upcoming task. These principles suggest an agentic view of inattention, according to which people are imperfect but intelligent managers of their attentional engagement and disengagement. We discuss the wide-ranging implications of this view on prior and future studies of attentional disengagement, the interpretability of performance in cognitive tasks, and strategies that can be implemented to reduce inattention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51529,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale","volume":" ","pages":"297-306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144735232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Memory selectivity of younger and older adults: The interactive effects of valence and subjective value. 青年和老年人的记忆选择性:效价和主观价值的交互作用。
IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1037/cep0000393
Lixia Yang, Shanny Foo

Whereas the ability to prioritize important information in memory remains preserved with age, it is still unclear how subjective value may interact with emotional valence to impact memory. The present study examined the interaction of value and valence in memory selectivity among younger and older adults. A sample of 24 younger (aged 17-29; 20.13 ± 2.54) and 24 older adults (aged 65-79, 70.13 ± 4.47) ranked valenced (positive and negative) and neutral words based on their subjectively perceived value/importance for memory. They then completed a value-directed remembering task, studying the same set of words paired with their assigned values, with a goal to maximize value points accrued in a subsequent word free recall task. Next, they completed a cued recall for values assigned to the words. Mixed-model analyses of variance were conducted on value assignment, word free recall, and cued value recall performance. Positive words were assigned a higher value/importance than negative or neutral words. Items assigned a higher value were better recalled and likely to be recalled first, an effect that tends to be larger for older than younger adults. Older adults generally face specific challenges recalling schema-inconsistent high values originally assigned to negative words, an effect absent in younger adults. The results suggested that valence can direct value assignment and, in turn, interact with the assigned value to guide memory selectivity. Relative to younger adults, older adults appear more likely to rely on a "positive is more valuable than negative" schema to guide value retrieval. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

尽管随着年龄的增长,人们在记忆中对重要信息进行优先排序的能力仍然保持不变,但主观价值如何与情绪效价相互作用,从而影响记忆,目前尚不清楚。本研究考察了价值和效价在年轻人和老年人记忆选择性中的相互作用。24名年轻人(17-29岁,20.13±2.54岁)和24名老年人(65-79岁,70.13±4.47岁)根据主观感知的记忆价值/重要性对评价词(积极词和消极词)和中性词进行排序。然后,他们完成了一项价值导向的记忆任务,研究了与他们指定的价值配对的同一组单词,目标是在随后的无词记忆任务中获得最大的价值点。接下来,他们完成了对分配给单词的值的提示回忆。对值赋值、无词查全率和线索值查全率进行混合模型方差分析。积极词汇被赋予了比消极或中性词汇更高的价值/重要性。被赋予更高价值的东西被更好地回忆起来,而且很可能首先被回忆起来,这种效应在老年人中往往比年轻人更大。老年人通常在回忆最初被赋予负面词汇的图式不一致的高值时面临特定的挑战,这在年轻人中是不存在的。结果表明,效价可以指导值的赋值,并与赋值相互作用来指导记忆的选择性。与年轻人相比,老年人似乎更倾向于依赖“积极比消极更有价值”的图式来指导价值检索。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Memory selectivity of younger and older adults: The interactive effects of valence and subjective value.","authors":"Lixia Yang, Shanny Foo","doi":"10.1037/cep0000393","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000393","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whereas the ability to prioritize important information in memory remains preserved with age, it is still unclear how subjective value may interact with emotional valence to impact memory. The present study examined the interaction of value and valence in memory selectivity among younger and older adults. A sample of 24 younger (aged 17-29; 20.13 ± 2.54) and 24 older adults (aged 65-79, 70.13 ± 4.47) ranked valenced (positive and negative) and neutral words based on their subjectively perceived value/importance for memory. They then completed a value-directed remembering task, studying the same set of words paired with their assigned values, with a goal to maximize value points accrued in a subsequent word free recall task. Next, they completed a cued recall for values assigned to the words. Mixed-model analyses of variance were conducted on value assignment, word free recall, and cued value recall performance. Positive words were assigned a higher value/importance than negative or neutral words. Items assigned a higher value were better recalled and likely to be recalled first, an effect that tends to be larger for older than younger adults. Older adults generally face specific challenges recalling schema-inconsistent high values originally assigned to negative words, an effect absent in younger adults. The results suggested that valence can direct value assignment and, in turn, interact with the assigned value to guide memory selectivity. Relative to younger adults, older adults appear more likely to rely on a \"positive is more valuable than negative\" schema to guide value retrieval. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51529,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale","volume":"79 4","pages":"329-337"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145745718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1