{"title":"Employment Status and Food Insecurity: Moderating Effects of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program","authors":"Chi-Fang Wu, Jun-Hong Chen","doi":"10.1086/722583","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722583","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88866280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Robert O Motley, Erik Simmons, Maribeth Clifton, E. Azasu, Danielle R. Walker, Carnayla Johnson
{"title":"Utilizing a Mediation-Moderation Model to Examine Exposure to Videos of Police use of Force in Media, Police Contact Anxiety, Grit, and Suicidality among Black Emerging adult College Students","authors":"Robert O Motley, Erik Simmons, Maribeth Clifton, E. Azasu, Danielle R. Walker, Carnayla Johnson","doi":"10.1086/722584","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722584","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90074733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
N. E. Walls, Brittanie Atteberry-Ash, Brendon T. Holloway, E. Harrop, Leonardo Kattari
{"title":"Correlates of LGBQ Activism and High-Risk Activism: The Role of a Critical Orientation to Social Justice and Ally Identity Measure Subdomains","authors":"N. E. Walls, Brittanie Atteberry-Ash, Brendon T. Holloway, E. Harrop, Leonardo Kattari","doi":"10.1086/722582","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722582","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"2012 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88144016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Chi-Fang Wu, Soo-Yeon Yoon, Jeehae Kang, William Joseph Schneider
{"title":"How Do Public Benefits Affect the Material Hardship of Under- and Unemployed Single Mothers?: Lessons from the Great Recession","authors":"Chi-Fang Wu, Soo-Yeon Yoon, Jeehae Kang, William Joseph Schneider","doi":"10.1086/722446","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722446","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90290021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kristen E. Ravi, Abha Rai, Ashlee Lawler, Courtney M. Cronley
{"title":"Intimate Partner Violence Effects on Children’s Academic Achievement: Results from a Nationally Representative Sample","authors":"Kristen E. Ravi, Abha Rai, Ashlee Lawler, Courtney M. Cronley","doi":"10.1086/722421","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722421","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85623784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Most child protection services (CPS) workers encounter client violence—physical and nonphysical violence initiated by clients—in their jobs, and such violence often harms worker health. Using the work-stress framework, this study aimed to understand the characteristics of client violence and how they affect worker health. Method: We conducted in-depth interviews with a statewide sample of CPS workers in Florida who have a range of exposure to client violence (N=33). We used thematic analysis to identify patterns in workers’ experiences and used narrative analysis to uncover event sequencing and consequences. Results: Participants commonly discussed three defining attributes of client violence: the spontaneity of violence, the personal nature of violence, and workplace support and responsiveness. Workers generally had one of two experiences: (a) Workers perceived that they experienced spontaneous attacks targeted at CPS workers, experienced ample agency support and responsiveness, and perceived no health consequence; or, (b) workers perceived premeditated, personal attacks without agency support and experienced psychological distress. Conclusions: Agency responsiveness and support, including protocols and guidelines to minimize and respond to violence, may negate health consequences. Protocols that consider worker subjectivity and provide workers with guidance in classifying violent incidents can direct and enhance agency response.
{"title":"Understanding the Effects of Client Violence on the Health of Child Protection Services Workers","authors":"M. Radey, Lisa Langenderfer-Magruder, D. Wilke","doi":"10.1086/712821","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/712821","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Most child protection services (CPS) workers encounter client violence—physical and nonphysical violence initiated by clients—in their jobs, and such violence often harms worker health. Using the work-stress framework, this study aimed to understand the characteristics of client violence and how they affect worker health. Method: We conducted in-depth interviews with a statewide sample of CPS workers in Florida who have a range of exposure to client violence (N=33). We used thematic analysis to identify patterns in workers’ experiences and used narrative analysis to uncover event sequencing and consequences. Results: Participants commonly discussed three defining attributes of client violence: the spontaneity of violence, the personal nature of violence, and workplace support and responsiveness. Workers generally had one of two experiences: (a) Workers perceived that they experienced spontaneous attacks targeted at CPS workers, experienced ample agency support and responsiveness, and perceived no health consequence; or, (b) workers perceived premeditated, personal attacks without agency support and experienced psychological distress. Conclusions: Agency responsiveness and support, including protocols and guidelines to minimize and respond to violence, may negate health consequences. Protocols that consider worker subjectivity and provide workers with guidance in classifying violent incidents can direct and enhance agency response.","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"61 1","pages":"533 - 555"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73107908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Terri L. Friedline, F. Cross, Katie Doyle, Ashley Lacombe-Duncan, Katie Schultz
The social work profession in the United States is striving to advance antiracism amidst increasing threats of white supremacist violence. However, tensions and paradoxes in the contexts of academic research and knowledge development, education and teaching, and service undermine the profession’s efforts. Structural or institutional processes—in higher education broadly and in schools of social work specifically—shape who publishes research, educates, and serves, and how labor is evaluated and rewarded. We identify practical recommendations to advance antiracism while cautioning against overemphasizing the responsibility of individual actors. Recommendations include prioritizing and generously funding scholarship on white supremacy and antiracism, providing clinical and adjunct faculty with sufficient remuneration and supports to excel in teaching, joining with students in protest against oppressive conditions in higher education, and equalizing rewards for service in accordance with those for research. Social workers must work proactively across multiple contexts to realize our professional commitment to dismantling white supremacy and advancing antiracism.
{"title":"Dismantling White Supremacy and Promoting Antiracism in Social Work: Tensions, Paradoxes, and a Collective Response","authors":"Terri L. Friedline, F. Cross, Katie Doyle, Ashley Lacombe-Duncan, Katie Schultz","doi":"10.1086/721800","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721800","url":null,"abstract":"The social work profession in the United States is striving to advance antiracism amidst increasing threats of white supremacist violence. However, tensions and paradoxes in the contexts of academic research and knowledge development, education and teaching, and service undermine the profession’s efforts. Structural or institutional processes—in higher education broadly and in schools of social work specifically—shape who publishes research, educates, and serves, and how labor is evaluated and rewarded. We identify practical recommendations to advance antiracism while cautioning against overemphasizing the responsibility of individual actors. Recommendations include prioritizing and generously funding scholarship on white supremacy and antiracism, providing clinical and adjunct faculty with sufficient remuneration and supports to excel in teaching, joining with students in protest against oppressive conditions in higher education, and equalizing rewards for service in accordance with those for research. Social workers must work proactively across multiple contexts to realize our professional commitment to dismantling white supremacy and advancing antiracism.","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"195 1","pages":"87 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72876371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
T he Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research ( JSSWR) celebrated its 10th anniversary in 2019, and despite the pandemic that followed, the past 2 years have been the most productive in the journal’s history. In 2020 and 2021, we received a record 308 submissions; at the same time, we reduced our average time to first decision to just 25 days andmaintained our selectivity, accepting just 15% of all articles. We also expanded the journal’s page count to better accommodate the increasing number of submissions and added a “Just Accepted” section that publishes unedited articles online upon acceptance. And, our Impact Factor has increased to 1.603—our highest yet. We are grateful to the authors, reviewers, and editors who powered this progress. In the year ahead, we will continue expanding our editorial and publishing capacity, which will reduce the time to publication for accepted articles.We have also diversified our editorial board and will continue to diversify our pool of reviewers. The most noteworthy change is in the journal’s mission. Over the past 2 years, the JSSWR editorial board hasworked in close partnershipwith the Society for Social Work and Research Committee on Publications to advance JSSWR’s commitment to antiracist scholarship. In 2020, we published an editorial that called on the social work research community to energize emerging lines of scholarship that will generate new evidence for social change and to be even more steadfast in efforts to
{"title":"Letter From the Editor: Introducing the New Mission for the Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","authors":"Todd I. Herrenkohl","doi":"10.1086/721442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721442","url":null,"abstract":"T he Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research ( JSSWR) celebrated its 10th anniversary in 2019, and despite the pandemic that followed, the past 2 years have been the most productive in the journal’s history. In 2020 and 2021, we received a record 308 submissions; at the same time, we reduced our average time to first decision to just 25 days andmaintained our selectivity, accepting just 15% of all articles. We also expanded the journal’s page count to better accommodate the increasing number of submissions and added a “Just Accepted” section that publishes unedited articles online upon acceptance. And, our Impact Factor has increased to 1.603—our highest yet. We are grateful to the authors, reviewers, and editors who powered this progress. In the year ahead, we will continue expanding our editorial and publishing capacity, which will reduce the time to publication for accepted articles.We have also diversified our editorial board and will continue to diversify our pool of reviewers. The most noteworthy change is in the journal’s mission. Over the past 2 years, the JSSWR editorial board hasworked in close partnershipwith the Society for Social Work and Research Committee on Publications to advance JSSWR’s commitment to antiracist scholarship. In 2020, we published an editorial that called on the social work research community to energize emerging lines of scholarship that will generate new evidence for social change and to be even more steadfast in efforts to","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"431 - 432"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84815144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
T. C. Goings, F. Belgrave, M. Mosavel, Caroline B R Evans
Researchers have been more successful at identifying racial and ethnic disparities than preventing and eliminating these disparities. Meeting the urgent need to increase equity requires a broad interdisciplinary paradigm shift to antiracist research. Antiracist research is an action-oriented paradigm that assumes that racism is maintained within institutions; seeks to dismantle racism using nonracist research methods; and requires that study findings are disseminated to, benefit, and empower the target population. The ultimate goal of antiracist research is to dismantle racism and achieve a just and equitable world. This paper defines antiracist research and explains how it can be used to dismantle the racism embedded in research practices. We offer a conceptual framework, including 10 foundational principles for understanding and practicing antiracist research. We also discuss challenges that antiracist researchers often encounter along the antiracist research lifecycle. We conclude by providing several practical recommendations for principal investigators, members of the research team, funders, and universities to consider as they conceptualize, implement, and evaluate their antiracist research activities. This article has the potential to help reduce inequities and disparities via an urgently needed paradigm shift in research.
{"title":"An Antiracist Research Framework: Principles, Challenges, and Recommendations for Dismantling Racism Through Research","authors":"T. C. Goings, F. Belgrave, M. Mosavel, Caroline B R Evans","doi":"10.1086/720983","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/720983","url":null,"abstract":"Researchers have been more successful at identifying racial and ethnic disparities than preventing and eliminating these disparities. Meeting the urgent need to increase equity requires a broad interdisciplinary paradigm shift to antiracist research. Antiracist research is an action-oriented paradigm that assumes that racism is maintained within institutions; seeks to dismantle racism using nonracist research methods; and requires that study findings are disseminated to, benefit, and empower the target population. The ultimate goal of antiracist research is to dismantle racism and achieve a just and equitable world. This paper defines antiracist research and explains how it can be used to dismantle the racism embedded in research practices. We offer a conceptual framework, including 10 foundational principles for understanding and practicing antiracist research. We also discuss challenges that antiracist researchers often encounter along the antiracist research lifecycle. We conclude by providing several practical recommendations for principal investigators, members of the research team, funders, and universities to consider as they conceptualize, implement, and evaluate their antiracist research activities. This article has the potential to help reduce inequities and disparities via an urgently needed paradigm shift in research.","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"101 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89604262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Could savings group interventions be interesting and acceptable for young women intimate partner violence survivors formerly in foster care? A brief report","authors":"I. Ogbonnaya","doi":"10.1086/720985","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/720985","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81100657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：