I. Altschul, Gloria Álvarez Bernardo, Gunel Amrahova, Kristan Armstrong, Annie Austin, Annahita Ball, V. Banyard, A. Barbee, Anamika Barman, Sara Beeler, S. Begun, Jennifer L. Bellamy, Natalie R. Beltrano, K. Bentley, Rupaleem Bhuyan, Rebecca L Bosetti, A. Bouris, N. Bowen, C. Brinkerhoff, L. Bronstein, Christina Bruhn, Rachel Burrage, J. Corcoran, John E. Cosgrove, Fernanda Cross, Xiaolu Dai, Laura Danforth, Karen D’Angelo, Carolyn Dayton, Bruce DeForge, D. DeHart, D. DePanfilis, L. Dill, S. Dodd, Brittany H. Eghaneyan, D. Elze, Richard Epstein, C. Everson, Anne SJ Farina, G. Farmer, L. Fedina, Alexandra Filindra, Sadaaki Fukui, John Gallagher, Stacy A. Gherardi, E. Gonzales, Oscar Gonzalez, Aa Gottlieb, Baorong Guo, Sally A. Hageman, J. Halloran, Tyler M. Han, Mary F. Held, Anna L Herriott, D. Hollinshead, H. Hsu, Hui Huang, M. Huda, Kimberly Hudson, A. Jackson, Leah Jacobs, Tina Jiwatram-Negrón, M. Jonson-Reid, R. Joseph, H. Jun, Isaac Karikari, June-Yung Kim, Marlene Kim, Susanne Klawetter, A. Kristja
T he peer-review process is critical to ensuring the quality and rigor of the work published by the Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research ( JSSWR). Peer reviews are the core of good scholarly publishing and a hallmark of all reputable journals. The peer reviewers listed here contributed their time and talents in 2022 to provide thoughtful, constructive critiques and encourage authors to produce their best written work. These reviewers have played a vital role in maintaining JSSWR’s high standards and commitment to timely dissemination of innovative research. Indeed, the time and effort that our peer reviewers dedicate to providing well-considered feedback on JSSWR submissions is a contribution not only to the journal but also to the social work field. The responsiveness of our reviewers has enabled JSSWR to maintain its commitment to high-quality, rapid review of manuscripts, with authors receiving a decision within 27 days of submission, on average. As a gesture of our appreciation to the referees who have given of their time and expertise, we would like to formally thank them for their service to the journal in 2022.
{"title":"Editor’s Acknowledgment of Service to JSSWR","authors":"I. Altschul, Gloria Álvarez Bernardo, Gunel Amrahova, Kristan Armstrong, Annie Austin, Annahita Ball, V. Banyard, A. Barbee, Anamika Barman, Sara Beeler, S. Begun, Jennifer L. Bellamy, Natalie R. Beltrano, K. Bentley, Rupaleem Bhuyan, Rebecca L Bosetti, A. Bouris, N. Bowen, C. Brinkerhoff, L. Bronstein, Christina Bruhn, Rachel Burrage, J. Corcoran, John E. Cosgrove, Fernanda Cross, Xiaolu Dai, Laura Danforth, Karen D’Angelo, Carolyn Dayton, Bruce DeForge, D. DeHart, D. DePanfilis, L. Dill, S. Dodd, Brittany H. Eghaneyan, D. Elze, Richard Epstein, C. Everson, Anne SJ Farina, G. Farmer, L. Fedina, Alexandra Filindra, Sadaaki Fukui, John Gallagher, Stacy A. Gherardi, E. Gonzales, Oscar Gonzalez, Aa Gottlieb, Baorong Guo, Sally A. Hageman, J. Halloran, Tyler M. Han, Mary F. Held, Anna L Herriott, D. Hollinshead, H. Hsu, Hui Huang, M. Huda, Kimberly Hudson, A. Jackson, Leah Jacobs, Tina Jiwatram-Negrón, M. Jonson-Reid, R. Joseph, H. Jun, Isaac Karikari, June-Yung Kim, Marlene Kim, Susanne Klawetter, A. Kristja","doi":"10.1086/724253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724253","url":null,"abstract":"T he peer-review process is critical to ensuring the quality and rigor of the work published by the Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research ( JSSWR). Peer reviews are the core of good scholarly publishing and a hallmark of all reputable journals. The peer reviewers listed here contributed their time and talents in 2022 to provide thoughtful, constructive critiques and encourage authors to produce their best written work. These reviewers have played a vital role in maintaining JSSWR’s high standards and commitment to timely dissemination of innovative research. Indeed, the time and effort that our peer reviewers dedicate to providing well-considered feedback on JSSWR submissions is a contribution not only to the journal but also to the social work field. The responsiveness of our reviewers has enabled JSSWR to maintain its commitment to high-quality, rapid review of manuscripts, with authors receiving a decision within 27 days of submission, on average. As a gesture of our appreciation to the referees who have given of their time and expertise, we would like to formally thank them for their service to the journal in 2022.","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76424113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The primary mission of the social work profession is to enhance human well-being and help meet the basic human needs of all people, with particular attention to the needs and empowerment of people who have been historically marginalized and oppressed. Race is a fundamental determinant of many outcomes that are prioritized by the field. Social work’s commitment to social justice and efforts to advance racial equity in critical areas such as socioeconomics and health are especially salient at this social and political moment in history. To meaningfully advance equity, social work researchers and practitioners must account for and explicitly address legacies of racism. To this end, this paper proposes that social work researchers consider the use of two theoretical frameworks—fundamental cause theory and critical race theory—that provide a conceptual framing of racism and socioeconomic status, which may be used to guide research and practice efforts to disrupt systems of racial oppression.
{"title":"Developing Antiracist Research to Address Racial/Ethnic Health and Socioeconomic Inequities: Conceptual Frameworks That Guide Equity","authors":"Darrell L. Hudson","doi":"10.1086/724663","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724663","url":null,"abstract":"The primary mission of the social work profession is to enhance human well-being and help meet the basic human needs of all people, with particular attention to the needs and empowerment of people who have been historically marginalized and oppressed. Race is a fundamental determinant of many outcomes that are prioritized by the field. Social work’s commitment to social justice and efforts to advance racial equity in critical areas such as socioeconomics and health are especially salient at this social and political moment in history. To meaningfully advance equity, social work researchers and practitioners must account for and explicitly address legacies of racism. To this end, this paper proposes that social work researchers consider the use of two theoretical frameworks—fundamental cause theory and critical race theory—that provide a conceptual framing of racism and socioeconomic status, which may be used to guide research and practice efforts to disrupt systems of racial oppression.","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"151 - 163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89409525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article introduces a special section of the Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research devoted to the development and dissemination of antiracist research. Antiracist research is defined as systematic theorizing, inquiry, intervention development, and program implementation that exposes, rejects, dismantles, and/or remedies racism, colonialism, antisemitism, and xenophobia with the goal of promoting racial justice. Although the social work profession values social justice and acknowledges racial inequities, there is a paucity of critical discourse and scholarship on antiracism. Based on a 2021 Society for Social Work and Research preconference session, this special section describes conceptual models, antiracism interventions, methodological strategies, and recommendations for antiracist research. Articles include critical discourse on current evidence and methodologies used in antiracist research, challenges to sustaining antiracist practices in academia, dismantling white supremacy, and the implementation of antiracist principles in social work research. This special section also includes recommendations for developing and disseminating antiracist research, supporting underrepresented scholars, and retaining social work researchers who conduct antiracist research. The conceptual models, methodologies, and recommendations proposed are instrumental to developing and sustaining an antiracist research agenda in social work. Acknowledging our power, privilege, and positionality is critical to authentically advancing antiracism in social work research.
{"title":"Introduction to the Special Section: Developing Antiracist Research From Research Questions to Dissemination","authors":"Nikki R. Wooten, L. Fedina, Darrell L. Hudson","doi":"10.1086/724718","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724718","url":null,"abstract":"This article introduces a special section of the Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research devoted to the development and dissemination of antiracist research. Antiracist research is defined as systematic theorizing, inquiry, intervention development, and program implementation that exposes, rejects, dismantles, and/or remedies racism, colonialism, antisemitism, and xenophobia with the goal of promoting racial justice. Although the social work profession values social justice and acknowledges racial inequities, there is a paucity of critical discourse and scholarship on antiracism. Based on a 2021 Society for Social Work and Research preconference session, this special section describes conceptual models, antiracism interventions, methodological strategies, and recommendations for antiracist research. Articles include critical discourse on current evidence and methodologies used in antiracist research, challenges to sustaining antiracist practices in academia, dismantling white supremacy, and the implementation of antiracist principles in social work research. This special section also includes recommendations for developing and disseminating antiracist research, supporting underrepresented scholars, and retaining social work researchers who conduct antiracist research. The conceptual models, methodologies, and recommendations proposed are instrumental to developing and sustaining an antiracist research agenda in social work. Acknowledging our power, privilege, and positionality is critical to authentically advancing antiracism in social work research.","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"10 1","pages":"75 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89777677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Case Study on Access to Inclusion for Black Women Social Work Doctoral Students","authors":"LaShawnda N. Fields, Aubrey Franke","doi":"10.1086/724756","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724756","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"292 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72486238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Daniel J. Gibbs, Jon D. Phillips, Kalah Villagrana
{"title":"Stress, Satisfaction, and Turnover Among Child Welfare Workers: Examining Associations with Quality of Interprofessional Collaboration","authors":"Daniel J. Gibbs, Jon D. Phillips, Kalah Villagrana","doi":"10.1086/724586","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724586","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76096127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Early Adverse Childhood Experiences and Exclusionary Discipline Practices in Middle Childhood","authors":"HyunYong Lee, L. Schelbe, M. Rauktis","doi":"10.1086/724553","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724553","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75957883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supervision and Job Performance in Social Workers in China: Mediation Effect of Burnout and Work Engagement","authors":"Bin Tu, Yulu Wang, E. Huang, Chien-Hsiang Huang","doi":"10.1086/724178","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724178","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"198 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75513657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Melissa L Villodas, Von E Nebbitt, Margaret Lombe, Mansoo Yu, Andrew Foell, Henrika McCoy, Ngozi V Enelamah
Objective: African American youth are disproportionately overrepresented in low-resourced segregated urban neighborhoods. Consequently, they experience greater exposure to neighborhood risks and subsequent depressive symptoms. Neighborhood cohesion represents a protective factor for youth in such environments. However, the concept remains underexplored among African American youth. This study examines the psychometric properties of a modified version of the Neighborhood Cohesion Index (NCI) among African American youth living in public housing.
Method: Psychometric properties were assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses using data from African American youth (N = 235) living in public housing in two large northeastern cities.
Results: The EFA resulted in the use of a single-factor structure with two dropped items and good internal validity. Findings from the CFA indicated that model fit indices were unacceptable for chi-square and RMSEA (χ2 [62; N = 235] = 170.19, p < .001); RMSEA = 0.09 [90% CI: 0.071, 0.102]) but were acceptable for SRMR and CFI (SRMR = 0.06; CFI = 0.91) with three error covariances.
Conclusions: The modified NCI is not ideal for assessing neighborhood cohesion among this understudied population. Future research should prioritize psychometric testing alongside cognitive interviewing, to provide a contextualized measure of neighborhood cohesion for this population.
{"title":"Assessing the Modified Neighborhood Cohesion Index Among African American Adolescents Living in Public Housing: An Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis.","authors":"Melissa L Villodas, Von E Nebbitt, Margaret Lombe, Mansoo Yu, Andrew Foell, Henrika McCoy, Ngozi V Enelamah","doi":"10.1086/716084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/716084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>African American youth are disproportionately overrepresented in low-resourced segregated urban neighborhoods. Consequently, they experience greater exposure to neighborhood risks and subsequent depressive symptoms. Neighborhood cohesion represents a protective factor for youth in such environments. However, the concept remains underexplored among African American youth. This study examines the psychometric properties of a modified version of the Neighborhood Cohesion Index (NCI) among African American youth living in public housing.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Psychometric properties were assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses using data from African American youth (<i>N</i> = 235) living in public housing in two large northeastern cities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EFA resulted in the use of a single-factor structure with two dropped items and good internal validity. Findings from the CFA indicated that model fit indices were unacceptable for chi-square and RMSEA (χ2 [62; <i>N</i> = 235] = 170.19, p < .001); RMSEA = 0.09 [90% CI: 0.071, 0.102]) but were acceptable for SRMR and CFI (SRMR = 0.06; CFI = 0.91) with three error covariances.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified NCI is not ideal for assessing neighborhood cohesion among this understudied population. Future research should prioritize psychometric testing alongside cognitive interviewing, to provide a contextualized measure of neighborhood cohesion for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"14 2","pages":"291-312"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348703/pdf/nihms-1837377.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9833715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Susanne Klawetter, Blair Weikel, Kristi Roybal, Nazan Cetin, Mathew C Uretsky, Stephanie L Bourque, Anne Hall, Sunah S Hwang, Madalynn Neu, Mauricio A Palau, Jessica Scott, Pari Shah, Jennifer C Greenfield
Objective: To explore the relationships between social and environmental factors and parenting self-efficacy (PSE) among mothers of preterm infants hospitalized in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) using a social determinants of health (SDoH) framework.
Method: We analyzed data from a prospective cohort study that included 187 mother-infant dyads admitted to four NICUs in the Mountain West region between June 2017 and December 2019. We used multivariable linear regression models to assess the independent associations between maternal and infant characteristics and PSE.
Results: Our final multiple linear regression model predicting the efficacy score including maternal race/ethnicity, age, insurance, employment status before giving birth, gestational age, depression, and having other children was significant (F(12,160) = 3.17, p = .0004, adjusted R¬2 = .131). Significant predictors of PSE were race/ethnicity (β= 3.3, p = .022), having another child/children (β= 4.2, p = .005), and depression (β= -4.2, p = .004).
Conclusions: Findings suggest that social workers and medical practitioners should consider SDoH, such as insurance type, household income, and employment, along with traditional clinical indicators when assessing families' infant care needs. Social workers, medical practitioners, and researchers should be mindful of how implicit bias may influence the allocation of care and parental supports.
目的:利用健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)框架，探讨社会环境因素与新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)早产儿母亲父母自我效能感(PSE)的关系。方法:我们分析了一项前瞻性队列研究的数据，该研究包括2017年6月至2019年12月在西部山区4个新生儿重症监护病房入住的187对母婴。我们使用多变量线性回归模型来评估母婴特征与PSE之间的独立关联。结果:我们最终的多元线性回归模型预测包括母亲种族/民族、年龄、保险、产前就业状况、胎龄、抑郁和是否有其他孩子在内的疗效评分具有显著性(F(12,160) = 3.17, p = 0.0004，调整后r2 = 0.131)。PSE的显著预测因子为种族/民族(β= 3.3, p = 0.022)、是否有另一个孩子/孩子(β= 4.2, p = 0.005)和抑郁症(β= -4.2, p = 0.004)。结论:研究结果提示社会工作者和医务工作者在评估家庭婴儿护理需求时，除了考虑传统临床指标外，还应考虑保险类型、家庭收入和就业等SDoH。社会工作者、医务工作者和研究人员应该注意内隐偏见如何影响照顾和父母支持的分配。
{"title":"Social Determinants of Health and Parenting Self-Efficacy Among Mothers of Preterm Infants.","authors":"Susanne Klawetter, Blair Weikel, Kristi Roybal, Nazan Cetin, Mathew C Uretsky, Stephanie L Bourque, Anne Hall, Sunah S Hwang, Madalynn Neu, Mauricio A Palau, Jessica Scott, Pari Shah, Jennifer C Greenfield","doi":"10.1086/716303","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/716303","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the relationships between social and environmental factors and parenting self-efficacy (PSE) among mothers of preterm infants hospitalized in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) using a social determinants of health (SDoH) framework.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We analyzed data from a prospective cohort study that included 187 mother-infant dyads admitted to four NICUs in the Mountain West region between June 2017 and December 2019. We used multivariable linear regression models to assess the independent associations between maternal and infant characteristics and PSE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our final multiple linear regression model predicting the efficacy score including maternal race/ethnicity, age, insurance, employment status before giving birth, gestational age, depression, and having other children was significant (F(12,160) = 3.17, p = .0004, adjusted R¬2 = .131). Significant predictors of PSE were race/ethnicity (β= 3.3, p = .022), having another child/children (β= 4.2, p = .005), and depression (β= -4.2, p = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that social workers and medical practitioners should consider SDoH, such as insurance type, household income, and employment, along with traditional clinical indicators when assessing families' infant care needs. Social workers, medical practitioners, and researchers should be mindful of how implicit bias may influence the allocation of care and parental supports.</p>","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"14 2","pages":"411-429"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336838/pdf/nihms-1878824.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9817113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：