Chih-Yuan Lin, Chih-Ching Liu, Yu-Tung Huang, Yue-Chune Lee
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Taiwan's categorization of hospital emergency capability (CHEC) policy is designed to regionalize and dispatch critical patients. The policy was designed in 2009 to improve the quality of emergency care for critical time-sensitive diseases (CTSDs). The CHEC policy primarily uses time-based quality surveillance indicators.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate the impact of Taiwan's CHEC policy on CTSDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Taiwan's 2005 Longitudinal Health Insurance Database, this nationwide retrospective cohort study examined the CHEC policy's impact from 2005 to 2011. Propensity score matching and difference-in-differences analysis within a generalized estimating equation framework were used to compare pre- and postimplementation periods. The study focused on acute ischemic stroke (AIS), ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), septic shock, and major trauma. AIS and STEMI cases, monitored with time-based indicators, were evaluated for adherence to diagnostic and treatment guidelines as process quality measures. Mortality and medical use served as outcome indicators. Major trauma, with evolving guidelines and no time-based monitoring, acted as a control to test for policy spotlight effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our cohort of 9923 patients, refined through 1:1 propensity score matching, 5566 (56.09%) were male and were mostly older adults. Our analysis revealed that the CHEC policy effectively improved system efficiency and patient outcomes, resulting in significant reductions in medical orders (-7.29 items, 95% CI -10.09 to -4.48; P<.001), short-term mortality rates (-0.09%, 95% CI -0.17% to -0.02%; P=.01) and long-term mortality rates (-0.09%, 95% CI -0.15% to -0.04%; P=.001), and total medical expenses (-5328.35 points per case, 95% CI -10,387.10 to -269.60; P=.04), despite a modest increase in diagnostic fees (376.37 points, 95% CI 92.42-660.33; P=.01). The CHEC policy led to notable increases in diagnostic fees, major treatments, and medical orders for AIS and STEMI cases. For AIS cases, significant increases were observed in major treatments (β=0.77; 95% CI 0.21-1.33; P=.007) and medical orders (β=15.20; 95% CI 5.28-25.11; P=.003) compared to major trauma. In STEMI cases, diagnostic fees significantly increased (β=1983.75; 95% CI 84.28-3883.21; P=.04), while upward transfer rates significantly decreased (β=-0.59; 95% CI -1.18 to -0.001; P=.049). There were also trends toward increased major treatments (β=0.30; 95% CI -0.03 to 0.62, P=.07), medical orders (β=11.92; 95% CI -0.90 to 24.73; P=.07), and medical expenses (β=24,275.54; 95% CI -640.71 to 4,991,991.78; P=.06), although these were not statistically significant. In contrast, no significant changes were identified in process or outcome quality indicators for septic shock. These findings suggest policy spotlight effects, reflecting a greater emphasis on diseases directly prioritized under the
背景:台湾的医院急救能力分类政策是为了区分和分派危重病人。这项政策是2009年制定的,目的是提高对严重时效性疾病的急诊护理质量。CHEC政策主要使用基于时间的质量监控指标。目的:探讨中国台湾地区CHEC政策对CTSDs的影响。方法:利用台湾2005年健康保险纵向数据库,对2005年至2011年健康保险政策的影响进行回顾性队列研究。在广义估计方程框架内使用倾向得分匹配和差异中差异分析来比较实施前后的时期。该研究的重点是急性缺血性卒中(AIS)、st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)、感染性休克和重大创伤。AIS和STEMI病例采用基于时间的指标进行监测,作为过程质量措施,评估其对诊断和治疗指南的依从性。死亡率和医疗使用作为结果指标。重大创伤的指导方针不断发展,没有基于时间的监测,作为测试政策聚光灯效应的对照。结果:在我们的9923例患者队列中,通过1:1倾向评分匹配细化,5566例(56.09%)为男性,大多数为老年人。我们的分析显示,CHEC政策有效地提高了系统效率和患者预后,导致医疗订单显著减少(-7.29项,95% CI -10.09至-4.48;结论:CHEC政策显示了降低成本和改善患者预后的双重益处。我们观察到政策聚光灯效应的意想不到的后果,这导致具有基于时间的监测指标的ctsd的指南依从性和过程质量的不成比例的改善。
{"title":"Policy Spotlight Effects on Critical Time-Sensitive Diseases: Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study on Taiwan's Hospital Emergency Capability Categorization Policy.","authors":"Chih-Yuan Lin, Chih-Ching Liu, Yu-Tung Huang, Yue-Chune Lee","doi":"10.2196/54651","DOIUrl":"10.2196/54651","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Taiwan's categorization of hospital emergency capability (CHEC) policy is designed to regionalize and dispatch critical patients. The policy was designed in 2009 to improve the quality of emergency care for critical time-sensitive diseases (CTSDs). The CHEC policy primarily uses time-based quality surveillance indicators.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate the impact of Taiwan's CHEC policy on CTSDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Taiwan's 2005 Longitudinal Health Insurance Database, this nationwide retrospective cohort study examined the CHEC policy's impact from 2005 to 2011. Propensity score matching and difference-in-differences analysis within a generalized estimating equation framework were used to compare pre- and postimplementation periods. The study focused on acute ischemic stroke (AIS), ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), septic shock, and major trauma. AIS and STEMI cases, monitored with time-based indicators, were evaluated for adherence to diagnostic and treatment guidelines as process quality measures. Mortality and medical use served as outcome indicators. Major trauma, with evolving guidelines and no time-based monitoring, acted as a control to test for policy spotlight effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our cohort of 9923 patients, refined through 1:1 propensity score matching, 5566 (56.09%) were male and were mostly older adults. Our analysis revealed that the CHEC policy effectively improved system efficiency and patient outcomes, resulting in significant reductions in medical orders (-7.29 items, 95% CI -10.09 to -4.48; P<.001), short-term mortality rates (-0.09%, 95% CI -0.17% to -0.02%; P=.01) and long-term mortality rates (-0.09%, 95% CI -0.15% to -0.04%; P=.001), and total medical expenses (-5328.35 points per case, 95% CI -10,387.10 to -269.60; P=.04), despite a modest increase in diagnostic fees (376.37 points, 95% CI 92.42-660.33; P=.01). The CHEC policy led to notable increases in diagnostic fees, major treatments, and medical orders for AIS and STEMI cases. For AIS cases, significant increases were observed in major treatments (β=0.77; 95% CI 0.21-1.33; P=.007) and medical orders (β=15.20; 95% CI 5.28-25.11; P=.003) compared to major trauma. In STEMI cases, diagnostic fees significantly increased (β=1983.75; 95% CI 84.28-3883.21; P=.04), while upward transfer rates significantly decreased (β=-0.59; 95% CI -1.18 to -0.001; P=.049). There were also trends toward increased major treatments (β=0.30; 95% CI -0.03 to 0.62, P=.07), medical orders (β=11.92; 95% CI -0.90 to 24.73; P=.07), and medical expenses (β=24,275.54; 95% CI -640.71 to 4,991,991.78; P=.06), although these were not statistically significant. In contrast, no significant changes were identified in process or outcome quality indicators for septic shock. These findings suggest policy spotlight effects, reflecting a greater emphasis on diseases directly prioritized under the","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e54651"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11979550/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143712065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sari Reisner, Yuxin Liu, Regina Tham, Kaiden Kane, S Wilson Cole, Elizabeth R Boskey, Sabra L Katz-Wise, Alex S Keuroghlian, Rena Xu
Background: In the United States, transgender, nonbinary, and gender diverse (TGD) young adults experience a higher risk of depression compared to their cisgender peers. Understanding factors associated with increased risk of depression within the TGD young adult population is important to guide clinical care as well as inform the development of interventions to reduce mental health disparities.
Objective: This exploratory study investigated the prevalence and correlates of positive screening for depressive symptoms among TGD young adults to inform the design, development, and implementation of national interventions aimed at improving mental health in this at-risk population.
Methods: In August 2022, a cross-sectional, nationwide online survey was conducted among TGD young adults aged 18-25 (N=104) in the United States. Measures included sociodemographic variables, family characteristics, mental health care utilization, and the two-item Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) screener for depression. Poisson regression models with robust variance estimation were fitted to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% CI for correlates of PHQ-2 depression (score ≥3).
Results: The study sample had a mean age of 22 (SD 2) years; 48/104 (46%) individuals identified as Black, Indigenous, or other People of Color, and 69/104 (66%) were nonbinary. Overall, 44 (42%) individuals screened positive for depression using PHQ-2. In a multivariable model adjusted for age, race and ethnicity, US census region, and health insurance status, factors associated with increased depression prevalence using PHQ-2 included low versus high family support (aPR 1.54, 95% CI 1.05-2.27) and identifying with a nonChristian religion versus being unaffiliated (aPR 1.66, 95% CI 1.04-2.63). Factors associated with reduced depression prevalence included living in a rural versus suburban area (aPR 0.48, 95% CI 0.26-0.92) and receiving mental health therapy versus not (aPR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.97).
Conclusions: The high prevalence of depressive symptoms among TGD young adults in this study sample highlights the need for comprehensive mental health evaluation and support in this population. Depression risk is increased among certain subgroups, such as those with low family support. These findings are valuable in informing the development of interventions that aim to improve mental health outcomes among TGD young people.
背景:在美国,变性、非二元和性别多元化(TGD)青壮年患抑郁症的风险要高于他们的顺性别同龄人。了解与 TGD 年轻成年人抑郁风险增加有关的因素,对于指导临床治疗以及为减少心理健康差异的干预措施的开发提供信息非常重要:这项探索性研究调查了TGD青壮年抑郁症状筛查阳性的患病率和相关因素,为旨在改善这一高危人群心理健康的国家干预措施的设计、开发和实施提供依据:2022 年 8 月,我们对美国 18-25 岁的 TGD 青壮年(104 人)进行了一次横断面全国性在线调查。调查内容包括社会人口学变量、家庭特征、精神卫生保健使用情况以及由两个项目组成的《患者健康问卷-2》(PHQ-2)抑郁症筛选器。采用稳健方差估计的泊松回归模型来估计 PHQ-2 抑郁症相关因素(得分≥3)的调整流行率(aPR)和 95% CI:研究样本的平均年龄为 22(SD 2)岁;48/104(46%)人被认定为黑人、土著人或其他有色人种,69/104(66%)人为非二元性别。总体而言,有 44 人(42%)通过 PHQ-2 筛查出抑郁症。在对年龄、种族和民族、美国人口普查地区和医疗保险状况进行调整后的多变量模型中,与使用 PHQ-2 的抑郁症患病率增加相关的因素包括:家庭支持少与家庭支持多(aPR 1.54,95% CI 1.05-2.27),以及认同非基督教宗教与无宗教信仰(aPR 1.66,95% CI 1.04-2.63)。与抑郁症患病率降低相关的因素包括居住在农村与郊区(aPR 0.48,95% CI 0.26-0.92)以及接受心理健康治疗与未接受心理健康治疗(aPR 0.71,95% CI 0.53-0.97):在这项研究的样本中,TGD 青壮年抑郁症状的发生率很高,这凸显了对这一人群进行全面心理健康评估和支持的必要性。在某些亚群中,抑郁症的风险会增加,如家庭支持较少的人群。这些发现对于制定旨在改善 TGD 年轻人心理健康结果的干预措施很有价值。
{"title":"Prevalence and Correlates of Clinically Elevated Depressive Symptoms in a Nationwide Sample of Transgender, Nonbinary, and Gender Diverse Young Adults in the United States: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.","authors":"Sari Reisner, Yuxin Liu, Regina Tham, Kaiden Kane, S Wilson Cole, Elizabeth R Boskey, Sabra L Katz-Wise, Alex S Keuroghlian, Rena Xu","doi":"10.2196/66630","DOIUrl":"10.2196/66630","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States, transgender, nonbinary, and gender diverse (TGD) young adults experience a higher risk of depression compared to their cisgender peers. Understanding factors associated with increased risk of depression within the TGD young adult population is important to guide clinical care as well as inform the development of interventions to reduce mental health disparities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This exploratory study investigated the prevalence and correlates of positive screening for depressive symptoms among TGD young adults to inform the design, development, and implementation of national interventions aimed at improving mental health in this at-risk population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In August 2022, a cross-sectional, nationwide online survey was conducted among TGD young adults aged 18-25 (N=104) in the United States. Measures included sociodemographic variables, family characteristics, mental health care utilization, and the two-item Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) screener for depression. Poisson regression models with robust variance estimation were fitted to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% CI for correlates of PHQ-2 depression (score ≥3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study sample had a mean age of 22 (SD 2) years; 48/104 (46%) individuals identified as Black, Indigenous, or other People of Color, and 69/104 (66%) were nonbinary. Overall, 44 (42%) individuals screened positive for depression using PHQ-2. In a multivariable model adjusted for age, race and ethnicity, US census region, and health insurance status, factors associated with increased depression prevalence using PHQ-2 included low versus high family support (aPR 1.54, 95% CI 1.05-2.27) and identifying with a nonChristian religion versus being unaffiliated (aPR 1.66, 95% CI 1.04-2.63). Factors associated with reduced depression prevalence included living in a rural versus suburban area (aPR 0.48, 95% CI 0.26-0.92) and receiving mental health therapy versus not (aPR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.97).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high prevalence of depressive symptoms among TGD young adults in this study sample highlights the need for comprehensive mental health evaluation and support in this population. Depression risk is increased among certain subgroups, such as those with low family support. These findings are valuable in informing the development of interventions that aim to improve mental health outcomes among TGD young people.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e66630"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957464/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143702030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The generalizability of clinical research hinges on robust study designs, which include the recruitment and maintenance of a representative study population. This study examines the evolution of the demographic characteristics of 329,038 participants who enrolled and participated in The All of Us Research Program (AoURP), a decentralized study aimed at representing the diversity of the United States.
Objective: The primary objectives of this study were to assess alterations in the demographic composition of the cohort at different protocol stages within AoURP, while analyzing completion rates and timeframes for survey and substudy completion. Additionally, we examined how participant interactions with the program impacted engagement and survey responses.
Methods: We conducted a longitudinal analysis of the AoURP data, tracking changes in demographic composition, completion rates, and completion times for surveys and substudies. Comparative analyses were performed to assess differences in engagement and survey completion based on sociodemographic characteristics of participants involved in postenrollment study components.
Results: The sociodemographic composition of the cohort that participated in the postenrollment study (eg, optional components) differed significantly from that of the recruited population. The proportion of self-identified White participants increased by 21.2%, whereas the proportion of Black or African American participants decreased by 12.18% (P=.02). Participants who identified as White (n=93,614, 52.7%) and NonHispanic (n=109,279, 42.21%) were more engaged compared to those identifying as Black or African American (n=10,887, 15.76%), Asian (n=4274, 38.72%), or Hispanic (n=12,530, 20.7%; P=.006). Participants' response times to study surveys and completeness varied across all demographic groups (P<.001). Furthermore, those identifying as White skipped fewer survey questions (1.19) compared to those identifying as Black or African American (1.40) or other racial and ethnic identities (P<.001).
Conclusions: The AoURP dataset serves as an exceptional resource for investigating diverse public health concerns. However, the longitudinal analysis of participant-level data underscores a significant skew in population diversity, suggesting the need for targeted strategies to enhance engagement and retention across all groups. Ensuring diversity in the cohort is essential for maintaining the study's representativeness and the broad applicability of its findings.
{"title":"Long-Term Engagement of Diverse Study Cohorts in Decentralized Research: Longitudinal Analysis of \"All of Us\" Research Program Data.","authors":"Vijay Yadav, Elias Chaibub Neto, Megan Doerr, Abhishek Pratap, Larsson Omberg","doi":"10.2196/56803","DOIUrl":"10.2196/56803","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The generalizability of clinical research hinges on robust study designs, which include the recruitment and maintenance of a representative study population. This study examines the evolution of the demographic characteristics of 329,038 participants who enrolled and participated in The All of Us Research Program (AoURP), a decentralized study aimed at representing the diversity of the United States.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objectives of this study were to assess alterations in the demographic composition of the cohort at different protocol stages within AoURP, while analyzing completion rates and timeframes for survey and substudy completion. Additionally, we examined how participant interactions with the program impacted engagement and survey responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a longitudinal analysis of the AoURP data, tracking changes in demographic composition, completion rates, and completion times for surveys and substudies. Comparative analyses were performed to assess differences in engagement and survey completion based on sociodemographic characteristics of participants involved in postenrollment study components.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sociodemographic composition of the cohort that participated in the postenrollment study (eg, optional components) differed significantly from that of the recruited population. The proportion of self-identified White participants increased by 21.2%, whereas the proportion of Black or African American participants decreased by 12.18% (P=.02). Participants who identified as White (n=93,614, 52.7%) and NonHispanic (n=109,279, 42.21%) were more engaged compared to those identifying as Black or African American (n=10,887, 15.76%), Asian (n=4274, 38.72%), or Hispanic (n=12,530, 20.7%; P=.006). Participants' response times to study surveys and completeness varied across all demographic groups (P<.001). Furthermore, those identifying as White skipped fewer survey questions (1.19) compared to those identifying as Black or African American (1.40) or other racial and ethnic identities (P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AoURP dataset serves as an exceptional resource for investigating diverse public health concerns. However, the longitudinal analysis of participant-level data underscores a significant skew in population diversity, suggesting the need for targeted strategies to enhance engagement and retention across all groups. Ensuring diversity in the cohort is essential for maintaining the study's representativeness and the broad applicability of its findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e56803"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966662/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143665361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Liesje Donkin, Nathan Henry, Amy Kercher, Mangor Pedersen, Holly Wilson, Amy Hai Yan Chan
Internet-based research has exploded in popularity in recent years, enabling researchers to offer both investigations and interventions to broader participant populations than ever before. However, challenges associated with internet-based research have also increased-notably, difficulties verifying participant data and deliberate data manipulation by bot and spam responses. This study presents a viewpoint based on 2 case studies where internet-based research was affected by bot and spam attacks. We aim to share the learnings from these experiences with recommendations for future research practice that may reduce the likelihood or impact of future attacks. The screening and verification processes used are presented and discussed, including the limitations of these. Based on our experience, security and screening within internet-based research platforms are partly effective, but no solution is available to protect researchers completely against bot attacks. Implications for future research and advice for health researchers are discussed.
{"title":"Effective Recruitment or Bot Attack? The Challenge of Internet-Based Research Surveys and Recommendations to Reduce Risk and Improve Robustness.","authors":"Liesje Donkin, Nathan Henry, Amy Kercher, Mangor Pedersen, Holly Wilson, Amy Hai Yan Chan","doi":"10.2196/60548","DOIUrl":"10.2196/60548","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Internet-based research has exploded in popularity in recent years, enabling researchers to offer both investigations and interventions to broader participant populations than ever before. However, challenges associated with internet-based research have also increased-notably, difficulties verifying participant data and deliberate data manipulation by bot and spam responses. This study presents a viewpoint based on 2 case studies where internet-based research was affected by bot and spam attacks. We aim to share the learnings from these experiences with recommendations for future research practice that may reduce the likelihood or impact of future attacks. The screening and verification processes used are presented and discussed, including the limitations of these. Based on our experience, security and screening within internet-based research platforms are partly effective, but no solution is available to protect researchers completely against bot attacks. Implications for future research and advice for health researchers are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e60548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953592/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143630929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Loneliness is a global public health issue contributing to a variety of mental and physical health issues. It increases the risk of life-threatening conditions and contributes to the burden on the economy in terms of the number of productive days lost. Loneliness is a highly varied concept, which is associated with multiple factors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to understand loneliness through a comparative analysis of loneliness data on Twitter and Reddit, which are popular social media platforms. These platforms differ in terms of their use, as Twitter allows only short posts, while Reddit allows long posts in a forum setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected global data on loneliness in October 2022. Twitter posts containing the words "lonely," "loneliness," "alone," "solitude," and "isolation" were collected. Reddit posts were extracted in March 2023. Using natural language processing techniques (valence aware dictionary for sentiment reasoning [VADER] tool from the natural language toolkit [NLTK]), the study identified and extracted relevant keywords and phrases related to loneliness from user-generated content on both platforms. The study used both sentiment analysis and the number of occurrences of a topic. Quantitative analysis was performed to determine the number of occurrences of a topic in tweets and posts, and overall meaningful topics were reported under a category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The extracted data were subjected to comparative analysis to identify common themes and trends related to loneliness across Twitter and Reddit. A total of 100,000 collected tweets and 10,000 unique Reddit posts, including comments, were analyzed. The results of the study revealed the relationships of various social, political, and personal-emotional themes with the expression of loneliness on social media. Both platforms showed similar patterns in terms of themes and categories of discussion in conjunction with loneliness-related content. Both Reddit and Twitter addressed loneliness, but they differed in terms of focus. Reddit discussions were predominantly centered on personal-emotional themes, with a higher occurrence of these topics. Twitter, while still emphasizing personal-emotional themes, included a broader range of categories. Both platforms aligned with psychological linguistic features related to the self-expression of mental health issues. The key difference was in the range of topics, with Twitter having a wider variety of topics and Reddit having more focus on personal-emotional aspects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reddit posts provide detailed insights into data about the expression of loneliness, although at the cost of the diversity of themes and categories, which can be inferred from the data. These insights can guide future research using social media data to understand loneliness. The findings provide the basis for further comparative investigation
{"title":"Understanding Loneliness Through Analysis of Twitter and Reddit Data: Comparative Study.","authors":"Hurmat Ali Shah, Mowafa Househ","doi":"10.2196/49464","DOIUrl":"10.2196/49464","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Loneliness is a global public health issue contributing to a variety of mental and physical health issues. It increases the risk of life-threatening conditions and contributes to the burden on the economy in terms of the number of productive days lost. Loneliness is a highly varied concept, which is associated with multiple factors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to understand loneliness through a comparative analysis of loneliness data on Twitter and Reddit, which are popular social media platforms. These platforms differ in terms of their use, as Twitter allows only short posts, while Reddit allows long posts in a forum setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected global data on loneliness in October 2022. Twitter posts containing the words \"lonely,\" \"loneliness,\" \"alone,\" \"solitude,\" and \"isolation\" were collected. Reddit posts were extracted in March 2023. Using natural language processing techniques (valence aware dictionary for sentiment reasoning [VADER] tool from the natural language toolkit [NLTK]), the study identified and extracted relevant keywords and phrases related to loneliness from user-generated content on both platforms. The study used both sentiment analysis and the number of occurrences of a topic. Quantitative analysis was performed to determine the number of occurrences of a topic in tweets and posts, and overall meaningful topics were reported under a category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The extracted data were subjected to comparative analysis to identify common themes and trends related to loneliness across Twitter and Reddit. A total of 100,000 collected tweets and 10,000 unique Reddit posts, including comments, were analyzed. The results of the study revealed the relationships of various social, political, and personal-emotional themes with the expression of loneliness on social media. Both platforms showed similar patterns in terms of themes and categories of discussion in conjunction with loneliness-related content. Both Reddit and Twitter addressed loneliness, but they differed in terms of focus. Reddit discussions were predominantly centered on personal-emotional themes, with a higher occurrence of these topics. Twitter, while still emphasizing personal-emotional themes, included a broader range of categories. Both platforms aligned with psychological linguistic features related to the self-expression of mental health issues. The key difference was in the range of topics, with Twitter having a wider variety of topics and Reddit having more focus on personal-emotional aspects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reddit posts provide detailed insights into data about the expression of loneliness, although at the cost of the diversity of themes and categories, which can be inferred from the data. These insights can guide future research using social media data to understand loneliness. The findings provide the basis for further comparative investigation","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e49464"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953590/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143630973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mert Marcel Dagli, Ryan William Turlip, Felix C Oettl, Mohamed Emara, Jaskeerat Gujral, Daksh Chauhan, Hasan S Ahmad, Gabrielle Santangelo, Connor Wathen, Yohannes Ghenbot, John D Arena, Joshua L Golubovsky, Ben J Gu, John H Shin, Jang Won Yoon, Ali K Ozturk, William C Welch
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a prevalent condition often treated with circumferential spinal fusion (CF), which can be performed as staged or same-day procedures. However, evidence guiding the choice between these approaches is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare patient outcomes following staged and same-day CF for ASD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus. Eligibility criteria included studies comparing outcomes following staged and same-day CF in adults with ASD. Searches were exported to Covidence, and records were deduplicated automatically. Title and abstract screening, full-text review, and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers, with all conflicts being resolved by a third reviewer. A meta-analysis was conducted for outcomes reported in 3 or more studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies with 741 patients undergoing CF for ASD were included in the review (staged: n=331, 44.7% and same-day: n=410, 55.3%). Four studies that had comparable outcomes were merged for the quantitative meta-analysis and split based on observed measures. The meta-analysis revealed significantly shorter hospital length of stay (mean difference 3.98, 95% CI 2.23-5.72 days; P<.001) for same-day CF. Three studies compared the operative time between staged and same-day CF, with all reporting a lower mean operative time for same-day CF (mean between 291-479, SD 129 minutes) compared to staged CF (mean between 426-541, SD 124 minutes); however, inconsistent reporting of mean and SD made quantitative analyses unattainable. Of the 4 studies that compared estimated blood loss (EBL) in the relevant groups, 3 presented a lower EBL (mean between 412-1127, SD 954 mL) in same-day surgery compared to staged surgery (mean between 642, SD 550 to 1351, SD 869 mL). Both studies that reported intra- and postoperative adverse events showed more intraoperative adverse events in staged CF (10.9% and 13.6%, respectively) compared to same-day CF (9.1% and 3.6%, respectively). Four studies measuring any perioperative adverse events showed a higher incidence of adverse events in staged CF than all studies combined. However, quantitative analysis of EBL, intraoperative adverse events, and perioperative adverse events found no statistically significant difference. Postoperative adverse events, reoperation, infection rates, and readmission rates showed inconsistent findings between studies. Data quality assessment revealed a moderate degree of bias for all included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Same-day CF may offer shorter operating time and hospital stay compared to staged CF for ASD. However, there was marked heterogeneity in perioperative outcomes reporting, and co
背景:成人脊柱畸形(ASD)是一种常见的疾病,通常采用周向脊柱融合术(CF)治疗,可以分阶段或当日手术进行。然而,指导在这些方法之间进行选择的证据是缺乏的。目的:本研究旨在比较ASD分期CF和当日CF患者的预后。方法:根据PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta - analysis)指南,在PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane CENTRAL、Web of Science和Scopus中进行全面的文献检索。入选标准包括比较成年ASD患者分期CF和当日CF的结果的研究。搜索结果导出到covid,并自动删除重复数据。标题和摘要筛选、全文审查和数据提取由两名独立审稿人完成,所有冲突由第三名审稿人解决。对3项或更多研究报告的结果进行了荟萃分析。结果:7项研究共纳入741例接受CF治疗的ASD患者(分期:n= 3331, 44.7%,当日:n=410, 55.3%)。四项具有可比结果的研究合并进行定量荟萃分析,并根据观察到的测量结果进行分割。荟萃分析显示住院时间明显缩短(平均差3.98,95% CI 2.23-5.72天;结论:与分期CF相比,ASD的当日CF可缩短手术时间和住院时间。然而,围手术期结果报告存在明显的异质性,连续变量的呈现不一致。这强调了临床变量和患者报告结果的标准化报告的必要性,以及随机对照试验的更高证据来阐明任何一种方法的临床优势。试验注册:PROSPERO CRD42022339764;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=339764.International注册报告标识符(irrid): RR2-10.2196/42331。
{"title":"Comparison of Outcomes Between Staged and Same-Day Circumferential Spinal Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mert Marcel Dagli, Ryan William Turlip, Felix C Oettl, Mohamed Emara, Jaskeerat Gujral, Daksh Chauhan, Hasan S Ahmad, Gabrielle Santangelo, Connor Wathen, Yohannes Ghenbot, John D Arena, Joshua L Golubovsky, Ben J Gu, John H Shin, Jang Won Yoon, Ali K Ozturk, William C Welch","doi":"10.2196/67290","DOIUrl":"10.2196/67290","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a prevalent condition often treated with circumferential spinal fusion (CF), which can be performed as staged or same-day procedures. However, evidence guiding the choice between these approaches is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare patient outcomes following staged and same-day CF for ASD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus. Eligibility criteria included studies comparing outcomes following staged and same-day CF in adults with ASD. Searches were exported to Covidence, and records were deduplicated automatically. Title and abstract screening, full-text review, and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers, with all conflicts being resolved by a third reviewer. A meta-analysis was conducted for outcomes reported in 3 or more studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies with 741 patients undergoing CF for ASD were included in the review (staged: n=331, 44.7% and same-day: n=410, 55.3%). Four studies that had comparable outcomes were merged for the quantitative meta-analysis and split based on observed measures. The meta-analysis revealed significantly shorter hospital length of stay (mean difference 3.98, 95% CI 2.23-5.72 days; P<.001) for same-day CF. Three studies compared the operative time between staged and same-day CF, with all reporting a lower mean operative time for same-day CF (mean between 291-479, SD 129 minutes) compared to staged CF (mean between 426-541, SD 124 minutes); however, inconsistent reporting of mean and SD made quantitative analyses unattainable. Of the 4 studies that compared estimated blood loss (EBL) in the relevant groups, 3 presented a lower EBL (mean between 412-1127, SD 954 mL) in same-day surgery compared to staged surgery (mean between 642, SD 550 to 1351, SD 869 mL). Both studies that reported intra- and postoperative adverse events showed more intraoperative adverse events in staged CF (10.9% and 13.6%, respectively) compared to same-day CF (9.1% and 3.6%, respectively). Four studies measuring any perioperative adverse events showed a higher incidence of adverse events in staged CF than all studies combined. However, quantitative analysis of EBL, intraoperative adverse events, and perioperative adverse events found no statistically significant difference. Postoperative adverse events, reoperation, infection rates, and readmission rates showed inconsistent findings between studies. Data quality assessment revealed a moderate degree of bias for all included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Same-day CF may offer shorter operating time and hospital stay compared to staged CF for ASD. However, there was marked heterogeneity in perioperative outcomes reporting, and co","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e67290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926459/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143576052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Priscila de Campos Tibúrcio, Priscila Maria Marcheti, Daniela Miori Pascon, Marco Antônio Montebello Junior, Maria Alzete de Lima, Carla Sílvia Fernandes, Célia Samarina Vilaça de Brito Santos, Maria do Perpétuo Socorro de Sousa Nóbrega
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major depressive disorder contributes to the global burden of mental illness. Therapeutic guidelines promote treatment self-management and support caregivers and family members in this process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to identify therapeutic guidelines for the symptoms of major depressive disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review followed the assumptions established by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) protocol, carried out in 12 databases (LILACS, PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science, b-on, BDENF, AgeLine, Cochrane, BVS, IBECS, and CINAHL) and 5 secondary gray literature sources (Google Scholar, Global ETD Search, EBSCO Open Dissertations, CAPES Catalog of Theses and Dissertations, and the Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations of the University of Sao Paulo). The eligibility criteria were based on the population, concept, and context framework: people diagnosed with major depressive disorder aged >18 years (population), therapeutic guidelines for self-management of major depressive disorder symptoms (concept), and symptoms of major depressive disorder (context). Data collection was carried out from March to July 2022 and updated in June 2024. The included studies were experimental, quasi-experimental, analytical observational, descriptive observational, qualitative, or quantitative studies; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and scoping and literature reviews published in full without time restrictions in English, Spanish, or Portuguese. All the information, as well as the studies captured, was stored in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet using Rayyan and the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The titles, abstracts, and full texts were carefully read and classified, extracting the results. After review by 2 independent researchers, 62 studies were selected. The results are presented descriptively, including characterization of the studies and mapping and categorization of groups and subgroups of therapeutic guidelines for self-management of major depressive disorder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 62 studies published between 2011 and 2023 were included, where 44 (71%) came from indexed data sources and 18 (29%) were gray literature indexed on Google Scholar (13/62, 21%), doctoral theses (3/62, 5%), and master's dissertations (2/62, 3%). Among the therapeutic guidelines identified, mapped, and categorized, 7 major groups were identified for self-management: psychotherapy (32/62, 52%), adoption of healthy habits (25/62, 40%), integrative and complementary practices (17/62, 27%), relaxation techniques (9/62, 14%), consultation with a health professional (14/62, 22%), pharmacological therapy (9/62, 14%), and leisure or pleasurable activities (4/62, 6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was possible to identify therapeutic guidelines to promote se
背景:重度抑郁症是全球精神疾病负担的一部分。治疗指南促进治疗自我管理,并在此过程中支持照顾者和家庭成员。目的:我们旨在确定重度抑郁症症状的治疗指南。方法:本综述遵循Joanna Briggs研究所和PRISMA-ScR(系统评价和meta -分析扩展范围评价的首选报告项目)协议建立的假设,在12个数据库(LILACS, PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science, b-on, BDENF, AgeLine, Cochrane, BVS, IBECS和CINAHL)和5个二级灰色文献来源(谷歌Scholar, Global ETD Search, EBSCO Open disserts, CAPES Catalog of Theses and disserts)中进行。以及圣保罗大学学位论文数字图书馆)。入选标准基于人群、概念和情境框架:年龄在bb0 - 18岁之间被诊断为重度抑郁症的人(人群)、重度抑郁症症状自我管理治疗指南(概念)和重度抑郁症症状(情境)。数据收集于2022年3月至7月进行,并于2024年6月更新。纳入的研究包括实验性、准实验性、分析性观察、描述性观察、定性或定量研究;系统评价和荟萃分析;范围界定和文献综述,不受时间限制,以英语、西班牙语或葡萄牙语全文发表。所有信息以及捕获的研究都使用Rayyan和JBI证据合成手册存储在Microsoft Excel电子表格中。题目、摘要和全文被仔细阅读和分类,提取结果。经过2位独立研究人员的审查,我们选择了62项研究。结果是描述性的,包括表征的研究和绘图和分类组和亚组的治疗指南,自我管理的重度抑郁症。结果:共纳入2011 - 2023年间发表的62篇研究,其中44篇(71%)来自已索引数据源,18篇(29%)来自b谷歌Scholar检索的灰色文献(13/ 62,21 %)、博士论文(3/ 62,5 %)和硕士论文(2/ 62,3 %)。在确定、绘制和分类的治疗指南中,确定了7个主要的自我管理组:心理治疗(32/ 62,52%)、采用健康习惯(25/ 62,40%)、综合和补充实践(17/ 62,27%)、放松技术(9/ 62,14%)、咨询健康专业人员(14/ 62,22%)、药物治疗(9/ 62,14%)和休闲或愉快活动(4/ 62,6%)。结论:有可能确定治疗指南,以促进成人重度抑郁症的自我管理。治疗指导是患者、家属和社区的重要资源,使患者成为自身健康的主角。对于卫生专业人员来说,治疗指南成为帮助培养患者护理技能和能力的工具,从而确保他们有能力自我管理严重抑郁症。
{"title":"Therapeutic Guidelines for the Self-Management of Major Depressive Disorder: Scoping Review.","authors":"Priscila de Campos Tibúrcio, Priscila Maria Marcheti, Daniela Miori Pascon, Marco Antônio Montebello Junior, Maria Alzete de Lima, Carla Sílvia Fernandes, Célia Samarina Vilaça de Brito Santos, Maria do Perpétuo Socorro de Sousa Nóbrega","doi":"10.2196/63959","DOIUrl":"10.2196/63959","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major depressive disorder contributes to the global burden of mental illness. Therapeutic guidelines promote treatment self-management and support caregivers and family members in this process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to identify therapeutic guidelines for the symptoms of major depressive disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review followed the assumptions established by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) protocol, carried out in 12 databases (LILACS, PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science, b-on, BDENF, AgeLine, Cochrane, BVS, IBECS, and CINAHL) and 5 secondary gray literature sources (Google Scholar, Global ETD Search, EBSCO Open Dissertations, CAPES Catalog of Theses and Dissertations, and the Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations of the University of Sao Paulo). The eligibility criteria were based on the population, concept, and context framework: people diagnosed with major depressive disorder aged >18 years (population), therapeutic guidelines for self-management of major depressive disorder symptoms (concept), and symptoms of major depressive disorder (context). Data collection was carried out from March to July 2022 and updated in June 2024. The included studies were experimental, quasi-experimental, analytical observational, descriptive observational, qualitative, or quantitative studies; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and scoping and literature reviews published in full without time restrictions in English, Spanish, or Portuguese. All the information, as well as the studies captured, was stored in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet using Rayyan and the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The titles, abstracts, and full texts were carefully read and classified, extracting the results. After review by 2 independent researchers, 62 studies were selected. The results are presented descriptively, including characterization of the studies and mapping and categorization of groups and subgroups of therapeutic guidelines for self-management of major depressive disorder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 62 studies published between 2011 and 2023 were included, where 44 (71%) came from indexed data sources and 18 (29%) were gray literature indexed on Google Scholar (13/62, 21%), doctoral theses (3/62, 5%), and master's dissertations (2/62, 3%). Among the therapeutic guidelines identified, mapped, and categorized, 7 major groups were identified for self-management: psychotherapy (32/62, 52%), adoption of healthy habits (25/62, 40%), integrative and complementary practices (17/62, 27%), relaxation techniques (9/62, 14%), consultation with a health professional (14/62, 22%), pharmacological therapy (9/62, 14%), and leisure or pleasurable activities (4/62, 6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was possible to identify therapeutic guidelines to promote se","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e63959"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926446/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143576056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: China has the largest elderly population globally; the growth rate of the aged tendency of the population was higher than that of Western countries. Given the distinctions in historical, ethnic, and economic status as well as socio-cultural background, Chinese adults had different sleep patterns compared with adults in other countries. Considering the heavy disease burden caused by activities of daily living (ADL) disability, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) to test the hypothesis that individuals with short and longer sleep duration are more likely to have ADL disability.
Objective: ADL disability is a common condition affecting the quality of life among older people. This study aimed to explore the associations between sleep duration and ADL disability among middle-aged and older adults in China.
Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from 17,607 participants from the 2018 CHARLS (from 2018 to 2020), an ongoing representative survey of adults aged 45 years or older and their spouses. Self-reported sleep duration per night was obtained from face-to-face interviews. The ADL was measured using a 6-item summary assessed with an ADL scale that included eating, dressing, getting into or out of bed, bathing, using the toilet, and continence. Multiple generalized linear regression models-adjusted for age, sex, education, marital status, tobacco and alcohol use, depression, place of residence, sensory impairment, self-reported health status, life satisfaction, daytime napping, chronic disease condition, and sample weights-were used.
Results: Data were analyzed from 17,607 participants, of whom 8375 (47.6%) were men. The mean (SD) age was 62.7 (10.0) years. Individuals with 4 hours or less (odds ratio [OR] 1.91, 95% CI 1.60-2.27; P<.001), 5 hours (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.09-1.62; P=.006), 9 hours (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.13-1.93; P<.001), and 10 hours or more (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.47-2.14; P<.001) of sleep per night had a higher risk of ADL disability than those in the reference group (7 hours per night) after adjusting for several covariates. Restricted cubic splines analysis suggested a U-shaped association between sleep duration and ADL disability. When sleep duration fell below 7 hours, an increased sleep duration was associated with a significantly low risk of ADL disability, which was negatively correlated with sleep duration until it fell below 7 hours (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.79-0.87; P<.001). When sleep duration exceeded 7 hours, the risk of ADL disability would increase facing prolonged sleep duration (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.27; P<.001). ADL disability should be monitored in individuals with insufficient (≤4 or 5 hours per night) or excessive (9 or ≥10 hours per night) sleep duration.
Unlabelled: In this study, a U-shaped association between sleep duratio
背景:中国是全球老年人口最多的国家;人口老龄化趋势的增长率高于西方国家。由于历史、民族、经济地位以及社会文化背景的差异,中国成年人的睡眠模式与其他国家的成年人不同。考虑到日常生活活动(ADL)残疾造成的沉重疾病负担,我们利用中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS)的数据进行了横断面分析,以检验睡眠时间短和较长个体更容易发生ADL残疾的假设。目的:ADL残疾是影响老年人生活质量的常见疾病。本研究旨在探讨中国中老年人睡眠时间与ADL残疾之间的关系。方法:本横断面研究使用了2018年CHARLS(2018年至2020年)的17607名参与者的数据,这是一项对45岁及以上成年人及其配偶的持续代表性调查。自我报告的每晚睡眠时间是通过面对面访谈获得的。ADL是用ADL量表评估的6项摘要来测量的,包括饮食、穿衣、上下床、洗澡、上厕所和自制。采用多元广义线性回归模型,校正了年龄、性别、教育程度、婚姻状况、烟酒使用、抑郁、居住地、感觉障碍、自我报告的健康状况、生活满意度、日间午睡、慢性疾病状况和样本重量。结果:分析了17607名参与者的数据,其中8375名(47.6%)为男性。平均(SD)年龄为62.7(10.0)岁。睡眠时间不超过4小时的个体(优势比[or] 1.91, 95% CI 1.60-2.27;注:在这项研究中,睡眠时间与ADL残疾之间呈u型关系。未来的纵向研究需要建立暂时性和检查睡眠时间和ADL残疾之间的关联机制。
{"title":"Associations Between Sleep Duration and Activity of Daily Living Disability Among Older Adults in China: Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Huimin Fan, Weijie Yu, Hongguo Rong, Xiaokun Geng","doi":"10.2196/65075","DOIUrl":"10.2196/65075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>China has the largest elderly population globally; the growth rate of the aged tendency of the population was higher than that of Western countries. Given the distinctions in historical, ethnic, and economic status as well as socio-cultural background, Chinese adults had different sleep patterns compared with adults in other countries. Considering the heavy disease burden caused by activities of daily living (ADL) disability, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) to test the hypothesis that individuals with short and longer sleep duration are more likely to have ADL disability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>ADL disability is a common condition affecting the quality of life among older people. This study aimed to explore the associations between sleep duration and ADL disability among middle-aged and older adults in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used data from 17,607 participants from the 2018 CHARLS (from 2018 to 2020), an ongoing representative survey of adults aged 45 years or older and their spouses. Self-reported sleep duration per night was obtained from face-to-face interviews. The ADL was measured using a 6-item summary assessed with an ADL scale that included eating, dressing, getting into or out of bed, bathing, using the toilet, and continence. Multiple generalized linear regression models-adjusted for age, sex, education, marital status, tobacco and alcohol use, depression, place of residence, sensory impairment, self-reported health status, life satisfaction, daytime napping, chronic disease condition, and sample weights-were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were analyzed from 17,607 participants, of whom 8375 (47.6%) were men. The mean (SD) age was 62.7 (10.0) years. Individuals with 4 hours or less (odds ratio [OR] 1.91, 95% CI 1.60-2.27; P<.001), 5 hours (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.09-1.62; P=.006), 9 hours (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.13-1.93; P<.001), and 10 hours or more (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.47-2.14; P<.001) of sleep per night had a higher risk of ADL disability than those in the reference group (7 hours per night) after adjusting for several covariates. Restricted cubic splines analysis suggested a U-shaped association between sleep duration and ADL disability. When sleep duration fell below 7 hours, an increased sleep duration was associated with a significantly low risk of ADL disability, which was negatively correlated with sleep duration until it fell below 7 hours (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.79-0.87; P<.001). When sleep duration exceeded 7 hours, the risk of ADL disability would increase facing prolonged sleep duration (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.27; P<.001). ADL disability should be monitored in individuals with insufficient (≤4 or 5 hours per night) or excessive (9 or ≥10 hours per night) sleep duration.</p><p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>In this study, a U-shaped association between sleep duratio","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e65075"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931321/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143568800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Sepsis is a globally recognized health issue that continues to contribute significantly to mortality and morbidity in intensive care units (ICUs). The association between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and prognosis among patients with patients is yet to be demonstrated.
Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the association between MAP and 28-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis using data from a large, multicenter database.
Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. We extracted data of 35,010 patients with sepsis from the MIMIC-IV (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care) database between 2008 and 2019, according to the Sepsis 3.0 diagnostic criteria. The MAP was calculated as the average of the highest and lowest readings within the first 24 hours of ICU admission, and patients were divided into 4 groups based on the mean MAP, using the quadruple classification approach. Other worst-case indications from the first 24 hours of ICU admission, such as vital signs, severity of illness scores, laboratory indicators, and therapies, were also gathered as baseline data. The independent effects of MAP on 28-day mortality were explored using binary logistic regression and a two-piecewise linear model, with MAP as the exposure and 28-day mortality as the outcome variables, respectively. To address the nonlinearity relationship, curve fitting and a threshold effect analysis were performed.
Results: A total of 34,981 patients with sepsis were included in the final analysis, the mean age was 66.67 (SD 16.01) years, and the 28-day mortality rate was 16.27% (5691/34,981). The generalized additive model and smoothed curve fitting found a U-shaped relationship between MAP and 28-day mortality in these patients. The recursive algorithm determined the low and high inflection points as 70 mm and 82 mm Hg, respectively. Our data demonstrated that MAP was negatively associated with 28-day mortality in the range of 34.05 mm Hg-69.34 mm Hg (odds ratio [OR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.92-0.94; P<.001); however, once the MAP exceeded 82 mm Hg, a positive association existed between MAP and 28-day mortality of patients with sepsis (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.01-1.02, P=.002).
Conclusions: There is a U-shaped association between MAP and the probability of 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. Both the lower and higher MAP were related with a higher risk of mortality in patients with sepsis. These patients have a decreased risk of mortality when their MAP remains between 70 and 82 mm Hg.
背景:脓毒症是一个全球公认的健康问题,它继续对重症监护病房(icu)的死亡率和发病率做出重大贡献。平均动脉压(MAP)与患者预后之间的关系尚未得到证实。目的:本研究的目的是利用来自大型多中心数据库的数据,探讨MAP与ICU脓毒症患者28天死亡率之间的关系。方法:回顾性队列研究。我们根据脓毒症3.0诊断标准,从2008年至2019年的MIMIC-IV(重症监护医疗信息市场)数据库中提取了35,010例脓毒症患者的数据。MAP取ICU入院前24小时内最高、最低读数的平均值,根据MAP平均值将患者分为4组,采用四重分法。ICU入院前24小时的其他最坏情况指征,如生命体征、疾病严重程度评分、实验室指标和治疗,也被收集作为基线数据。分别以MAP为暴露量和28天死亡率为结局变量,采用二元logistic回归和二分段线性模型探讨MAP对28天死亡率的独立影响。为了解决非线性关系,进行了曲线拟合和阈值效应分析。结果:最终纳入脓毒症患者34,981例,平均年龄66.67 (SD 16.01)岁,28天死亡率为16.27%(5691/34,981)。广义加性模型和平滑曲线拟合发现MAP与这些患者28天死亡率呈u型关系。递归算法确定低拐点为70 mm,高拐点为82 mm Hg。我们的数据显示,在34.05 mm Hg-69.34 mm Hg范围内,MAP与28天死亡率呈负相关(优势比[OR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.92-0.94;结论:MAP与脓毒症患者28天死亡率呈u型相关。在脓毒症患者中,较高和较低的MAP均与较高的死亡风险相关。当MAP保持在70 - 82 mmhg之间时,这些患者的死亡风险降低。
{"title":"Investigating the Association Between Mean Arterial Pressure on 28-Day Mortality Risk in Patients With Sepsis: Retrospective Cohort Study Based on the MIMIC-IV Database.","authors":"Qimin Chen, Wei Li, Ying Wang, Xianjun Chen, Dehua He, Ming Liu, Jia Yuan, Chuan Xiao, Qing Li, Lu Chen, Feng Shen","doi":"10.2196/63291","DOIUrl":"10.2196/63291","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is a globally recognized health issue that continues to contribute significantly to mortality and morbidity in intensive care units (ICUs). The association between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and prognosis among patients with patients is yet to be demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore the association between MAP and 28-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis using data from a large, multicenter database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study. We extracted data of 35,010 patients with sepsis from the MIMIC-IV (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care) database between 2008 and 2019, according to the Sepsis 3.0 diagnostic criteria. The MAP was calculated as the average of the highest and lowest readings within the first 24 hours of ICU admission, and patients were divided into 4 groups based on the mean MAP, using the quadruple classification approach. Other worst-case indications from the first 24 hours of ICU admission, such as vital signs, severity of illness scores, laboratory indicators, and therapies, were also gathered as baseline data. The independent effects of MAP on 28-day mortality were explored using binary logistic regression and a two-piecewise linear model, with MAP as the exposure and 28-day mortality as the outcome variables, respectively. To address the nonlinearity relationship, curve fitting and a threshold effect analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34,981 patients with sepsis were included in the final analysis, the mean age was 66.67 (SD 16.01) years, and the 28-day mortality rate was 16.27% (5691/34,981). The generalized additive model and smoothed curve fitting found a U-shaped relationship between MAP and 28-day mortality in these patients. The recursive algorithm determined the low and high inflection points as 70 mm and 82 mm Hg, respectively. Our data demonstrated that MAP was negatively associated with 28-day mortality in the range of 34.05 mm Hg-69.34 mm Hg (odds ratio [OR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.92-0.94; P<.001); however, once the MAP exceeded 82 mm Hg, a positive association existed between MAP and 28-day mortality of patients with sepsis (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.01-1.02, P=.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a U-shaped association between MAP and the probability of 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. Both the lower and higher MAP were related with a higher risk of mortality in patients with sepsis. These patients have a decreased risk of mortality when their MAP remains between 70 and 82 mm Hg.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e63291"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931324/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143568802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Unlabelled: Case report forms (CRFs) are the instruments used by research organizations worldwide to collect information about patients and study participants with the purpose of answering specific questions, assessing the efficacy and safety of medical products, and in general improving prevention and treatment in health care. To obtain significant research results out of the collected data, CRFs should be designed following the recommendations issued by regulatory authorities. However, we believe that semantic interoperability in CRFs has not yet been properly addressed. Within an international consortium comprising several COVID-19 cohorts, we scrutinized the questions included in the different CRFs with the purpose of establishing semantic interoperability across the different study data elements so that data could be merged and jointly analyzed. We realized that similar concepts were structured very differently across the different CRFs, making it hard to find and match the information. Based on the experience acquired, we developed 5 guiding principles on how to design CRFs to support semantic interoperability and increase data quality while also facilitating the sharing of data. Our aim in this viewpoint is to provide general suggestions that, in our opinion, should support researchers in designing CRFs. We conclude by urging authorities to establish an international coordination board for standards and interoperable clinical study data with competence in clinical data, interoperability standards, and data protection as part of a preparedness plan for future pandemics or other health threats.
{"title":"How to Design Electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) Questions to Maximize Semantic Interoperability in Clinical Research.","authors":"Eugenia Rinaldi, Caroline Stellmach, Sylvia Thun","doi":"10.2196/51598","DOIUrl":"10.2196/51598","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Case report forms (CRFs) are the instruments used by research organizations worldwide to collect information about patients and study participants with the purpose of answering specific questions, assessing the efficacy and safety of medical products, and in general improving prevention and treatment in health care. To obtain significant research results out of the collected data, CRFs should be designed following the recommendations issued by regulatory authorities. However, we believe that semantic interoperability in CRFs has not yet been properly addressed. Within an international consortium comprising several COVID-19 cohorts, we scrutinized the questions included in the different CRFs with the purpose of establishing semantic interoperability across the different study data elements so that data could be merged and jointly analyzed. We realized that similar concepts were structured very differently across the different CRFs, making it hard to find and match the information. Based on the experience acquired, we developed 5 guiding principles on how to design CRFs to support semantic interoperability and increase data quality while also facilitating the sharing of data. Our aim in this viewpoint is to provide general suggestions that, in our opinion, should support researchers in designing CRFs. We conclude by urging authorities to establish an international coordination board for standards and interoperable clinical study data with competence in clinical data, interoperability standards, and data protection as part of a preparedness plan for future pandemics or other health threats.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e51598"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931322/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143607258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}